Durham Research Online
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Western North Greenland (Laurentia)
BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF DENMARK · VOL. 69 · 2021 Trilobite fauna of the Telt Bugt Formation (Cambrian Series 2–Miaolingian Series), western North Greenland (Laurentia) JOHN S. PEEL Peel, J.S. 2021. Trilobite fauna of the Telt Bugt Formation (Cambrian Series 2–Mi- aolingian Series), western North Greenland (Laurentia). Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, Vol. 69, pp. 1–33. ISSN 2245-7070. https://doi.org/10.37570/bgsd-2021-69-01 Trilobites dominantly of middle Cambrian (Miaolingian Series, Wuliuan Stage) Geological Society of Denmark age are described from the Telt Bugt Formation of Daugaard-Jensen Land, western https://2dgf.dk North Greenland (Laurentia), which is a correlative of the Cape Wood Formation of Inglefield Land and Ellesmere Island, Nunavut. Four biozones are recognised in Received 6 July 2020 Daugaard-Jensen Land, representing the Delamaran and Topazan regional stages Accepted in revised form of the western USA. The basal Plagiura–Poliella Biozone, with Mexicella cf. robusta, 16 December 2020 Kochiella, Fieldaspis? and Plagiura?, straddles the Cambrian Series 2–Miaolingian Series Published online 20 January 2021 boundary. It is overlain by the Mexicella mexicana Biozone, recognised for the first time in Greenland, with rare specimens of Caborcella arrojosensis. The Glossopleura walcotti © 2021 the authors. Re-use of material is Biozone, with Glossopleura, Clavaspidella and Polypleuraspis, dominates the succes- permitted, provided this work is cited. sion in eastern Daugaard-Jensen Land but is seemingly not represented in the type Creative Commons License CC BY: section in western outcrops, likely reflecting the drastic thinning of the formation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ towards the north-west. -
Proposed Global Standard Stratotype-Section And
PROPOSED GLOBAL STANDARD STRATOTYPE-SECTION AND POINT FOR THE DRUMIAN STAGE (CAMBRIAN) Prepared for the International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy by: Loren E. Babcock School of Earth Sciences The Ohio State University, 125 South Oval Mall Columbus, OH 43210, USA [email protected] Richard A. Robison Department of Geology, University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045, USA [email protected] Margaret N. Rees Department of Geoscience University of Nevada, Las Vegas Las Vegas, NV 89145, USA [email protected] Peng Shanchi Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology Chinese Academy of Sciences 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China [email protected] Matthew R. Saltzman School of Earth Sciences The Ohio State University, 125 South Oval Mall Columbus, OH 43210, USA [email protected] 31 July 2006 CONTENTS Introduction …………………………………………………………………………. 2 Proposal: Stratotype Ridge, Drum Mountains (Millard County, Utah, USA) as the GSSP for the base of the Drumian Stage ……………………………………………………. 3 1. Stratigraphic rank of the boundary …………………..…………………………… 3 2. Proposed GSSP – geography and physical geology ……………………………… 3 2.1. Geographic location …………………………………………………...….. 3 2.2. Geological location ………………..……………………...…………...….. 4 2.3. Location of level and specific point ……………………..……………...… 4 2.4. Stratigraphic completeness ………………...……………………………… 5 2.5. Thickness and stratigraphic extent …………………...……………...……. 5 2.6. Provisions for conservation, protection, and accessibility ……………..…. 5 3. Motivation for selection of the boundary level and of the potential stratotype section ………………………………………………………………………………. 6 3.1. Principal correlation event (marker) at GSSP level ………...…………..… 6 3.2. Potential stratotype section …………………………………………....….. 7 3.3. Demonstration of regional and global correlation ………………………... 8 3.3.1. Agnostoid trilobite biostratigraphy ………………………………… 9 3.3.2. Polymerid trilobite biostratigraphy …………....…………….……. -
PHYLOGENY and DISTRIBUTION by LARS E
[Papers in Palaeontology, 2019, pp. 1–17] CAMBRIAN RHYNCHONELLIFORM NISUSIOID BRACHIOPODS: PHYLOGENY AND DISTRIBUTION by LARS E. HOLMER1,2 , MOHAMMAD-REZA KEBRIA-EE ZADEH3, LEONID E. POPOV4, MANSOUREH GHOBADI POUR2,4,5,J.JAVIERALVARO 6, VACHIK HAIRAPETIAN7 and ZHIFEI ZHANG1 1Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Early Life & Environments, State Key Laboratory for Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, Xi’an, 710069, China 2Department of Earth Sciences, Palaeobiology, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] 3Department of Geology, Payame Noor University, Semnan, Iran; [email protected] 4Department of Earth Sciences, National Museum of Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NP, UK; [email protected] 5Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Golestan University, Gorgan, 49138-15739, Iran; [email protected] 6Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM), Dr. Severo Ochoa 7, Madrid, 28040, Spain; [email protected] 7Department of Geology, Khorasgan (Isfahan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, PO Box 81595-158, Isfahan, Iran; [email protected] Typescript received 18 July 2018; accepted in revised form 6 November 2018 Abstract: A comprehensive review and phylogenetic analy- an early separation of the lineages of spinose and non-spi- sis of genera and species presently assigned to the rhyn- nose nisusiids. The non-spinose nisusiids probably evolved chonelliform superfamily Nisusioidea and family Nisusiidae in Laurentia by the end of Cambrian Series 4. The new suggests that this short-lived but important group of bra- nisusiid genus Bellistrophia is described. The new species chiopods first appeared in peri-Gondwana during the second Nisusia multicostata represents the first documented rhyn- half of the Cambrian Series 2, before going extinct by the chonelliform (kutorginide) brachiopod from the Miaolingian end of Drumian times. -
Revised Sequence Stratigraphy of the Ordovician of Baltoscandia …………………………………………… 20 Druzhinina, O
Baltic Stratigraphical Association Department of Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia Natural History Museum of Latvia THE EIGHTH BALTIC STRATIGRAPHICAL CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS Edited by E. Lukševičs, Ģ. Stinkulis and J. Vasiļkova Rīga, 2011 The Eigth Baltic Stratigraphical Conference 28 August – 1 September 2011, Latvia Abstracts Edited by E. Lukševičs, Ģ. Stinkulis and J. Vasiļkova Scientific Committee: Organisers: Prof. Algimantas Grigelis (Vilnius) Baltic Stratigraphical Association Dr. Olle Hints (Tallinn) Department of Geology, University of Latvia Dr. Alexander Ivanov (St. Petersburg) Natural History Museum of Latvia Prof. Leszek Marks (Warsaw) Northern Vidzeme Geopark Prof. Tõnu Meidla (Tartu) Dr. Jonas Satkūnas (Vilnius) Prof. Valdis Segliņš (Riga) Prof. Vitālijs Zelčs (Chairman, Riga) Recommended reference to this publication Ceriņa, A. 2011. Plant macrofossil assemblages from the Eemian-Weichselian deposits of Latvia and problems of their interpretation. In: Lukševičs, E., Stinkulis, Ģ. and Vasiļkova, J. (eds). The Eighth Baltic Stratigraphical Conference. Abstracts. University of Latvia, Riga. P. 18. The Conference has special sessions of IGCP Project No 591 “The Early to Middle Palaeozoic Revolution” and IGCP Project No 596 “Climate change and biodiversity patterns in the Mid-Palaeozoic (Early Devonian to Late Carboniferous)”. See more information at http://igcl591.org. Electronic version can be downloaded at www.geo.lu.lv/8bsc Hard copies can be obtained from: Department of Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia Raiņa Boulevard 19, Riga LV-1586, Latvia E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-9984-45-383-5 Riga, 2011 2 Preface Baltic co-operation in regional stratigraphy is active since the foundation of the Baltic Regional Stratigraphical Commission (BRSC) in 1969 (Grigelis, this volume). -
Permophiles International Commission on Stratigraphy
Permophiles International Commission on Stratigraphy Newsletter of the Subcommission on Permian Stratigraphy Number 66 Supplement 1 ISSN 1684 – 5927 August 2018 Permophiles Issue #66 Supplement 1 8th INTERNATIONAL BRACHIOPOD CONGRESS Brachiopods in a changing planet: from the past to the future Milano 11-14 September 2018 GENERAL CHAIRS Lucia Angiolini, Università di Milano, Italy Renato Posenato, Università di Ferrara, Italy ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Chair: Gaia Crippa, Università di Milano, Italy Valentina Brandolese, Università di Ferrara, Italy Claudio Garbelli, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, China Daniela Henkel, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany Marco Romanin, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland Facheng Ye, Università di Milano, Italy SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Fernando Álvarez Martínez, Universidad de Oviedo, Spain Lucia Angiolini, Università di Milano, Italy Uwe Brand, Brock University, Canada Sandra J. Carlson, University of California, Davis, United States Maggie Cusack, University of Stirling, United Kingdom Anton Eisenhauer, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany David A.T. Harper, Durham University, United Kingdom Lars Holmer, Uppsala University, Sweden Fernando Garcia Joral, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain Carsten Lüter, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany Alberto Pérez-Huerta, University of Alabama, United States Renato Posenato, Università di Ferrara, Italy Shuzhong Shen, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, China 1 Permophiles Issue #66 Supplement -
WITSML Lithology Object Usage Guide
WITSML Lithology Element Usage Guide For WITSML Version 1.4.1 WITSML The Wellsite Information Transfer Standard Mark-up Language (WITSML) consists of XML data-object Overview definitions and a Web services specification developed to promote the right-time, seamless flow of well data between operators and service companies to speed and enhance decision making. Version: Version 1.01 Abstract This document is a guide for implementing and using the lithology element of the mudLog data-object. This lithology element was significantly modified and released as part of WITSML v1.4.1. Prepared by: WITSML SIG Lithology Sub-team Date published: 18 November 2011 Minor revisions January 2012 Document type: Usage Guide Keywords: Data exchange standard, lithology, data, information, qualifier, matrix cement WITSML Lithology Element Usage Guide Document Information DOCUMENT VERSION: 1.01 DATE: January 2012 Technical Language US English Usage, Intellectual Property Rights, and Copyright The material described in this document was developed by and is the intellectual property of Energistics. Energistics develops material for open, public use so that the material is accessible and can be of maximum value to everyone. Use of the material in this document is governed by the Energistics Intellectual Property Policy document and the Product Licensing Agreement, both of which can be found on the Energistics website, http://www.energistics.org/legal-policies. All Energistics published materials are freely available for public comment and use. Anyone may copy and share the materials but must always acknowledge Energistics as the source. No one may restrict use or dissemination of Energistics materials in any way. -
Annual Meeting 2011
The Palaeontological Association 55th Annual Meeting 17th–20th December 2011 Plymouth University PROGRAMME and ABSTRACTS Palaeontological Association 2 ANNUAL MEETING ANNUAL MEETING Palaeontological Association 1 The Palaeontological Association 55th Annual Meeting 17th–20th December 2011 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University The programme and abstracts for the 55th Annual Meeting of the Palaeontological Association are outlined after the following summary of the meeting. Venue The meeting will take place on the campus of Plymouth University. Directions to the University and a campus map can be found at <http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/location>. The opening symposium and the main oral sessions will be held in the Sherwell Centre, located on North Hill, on the east side of campus. Accommodation Delegates need to make their own arrangements for accommodation. Plymouth has a large number of hotels, guesthouses and hostels at a variety of prices, most of which are within ~1km of the University campus (hotels with PL1 or PL4 postcodes are closest). More information on these can be found through the usual channels, and a useful starting point is the website <http://www.visitplymouth.co.uk/site/where-to-stay>. In addition, we have organised discount rates at the Jury’s Inn, Exeter Street, which is located ~500m from the conference venue. A maximum of 100 rooms have been reserved, and will be allocated on a first-come-first-served basis. Further information can be found on the Association’s website. Travel Transport into Plymouth can be achieved via a variety of means. Travel by train from London Paddington to Plymouth takes between three and four hours depending on the time of day and the number of stops. -
(Re)Proposal of Three Cambrian Subsystems and Their Geochronology
Article 273 by Ed Landing1*, Gerd Geyer2, Mark D. Schmitz3, Thomas Wotte4, and Artem Kouchinsky5 (Re)proposal of three Cambrian Subsystems and their Geochronology 1 New York State Museum, 222 Madison Avenue, Albany, NY, USA; *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] 2 Lehrstuhl für Geodynamik und Geomaterialforschung, Institut für Geographie und Geologie, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany 3 Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, Idaho 83725, USA 4 Department of Palaeontology, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Bernhard-von-Cotta-Straße, D-09599 Freiberg, Germany 5 Department of Palaeontology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden (Received: April 29, 2020; Revised accepted: September 24, 2020) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020088 The Cambrian is anomalous among geological systems 2018). Following work by the International Subcommission on Cam- as many reports divide it into three divisions of indetermi- brian Stratigraphy (ISCS), these key biotic developments can be related nate rank. This use of “lower”, “middle”, and “upper” has to the chronostratigraphic subdivision of the Cambrian System into been a convenient way to subdivide the Cambrian despite four global series and ten stages (e.g., Babcock, 2005; Babcock and agreement it consists of four global series. Traditional divi- Peng, 2007) complemented by an increasingly precise U-Pb (numeri- sions of the system into regional series (Lower, Middle, cal) geochronology (Fig. 1). This decision at the 2004 ISCS meeting Upper) reflected local biotic developments not interpro- meant that the traditional subdivisions of the Cambrian into regional “Lower,” “Middle,” and “Upper” series (discussed below) were no lon- vincially correlatable with any precision. -
Phytoplankton Dynamics from the Cambrian Explosion to the Onset of the Great
1 Phytoplankton dynamics from the Cambrian Explosion to the onset of the Great 2 Ordovician Biodiversification Event: a review of Cambrian acritarch diversity 3 4 Hendrik Nowaka, Thomas Servaisa,*, Claude Monneta, Stewart G. Molyneuxb, Thijs R. A. 5 Vandenbrouckea 6 7 a Evo-Eco-Paleo, UMR 8198, CNRS-University of Lille, Avenue Paul Langevin, bâtiment SN5, 8 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France 9 b Honorary Research Associate, British Geological Survey Environmental Science Centre, Nicker 10 Hill, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom 11 12 * Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 320337220. 13 E-mail addresses: [email protected] (H. Nowak), thomas.servais@univ- 14 lille1.fr (T. Servais), [email protected] (C. Monnet), [email protected] (S.G. Molyneux), 15 [email protected] (T.R.A. Vandenbroucke). 16 17 Abstract: Most early Palaeozoic acritarchs are thought to represent a part of the marine 18 phytoplankton and so constituted a significant element at the base of the marine trophic chain 19 during the ‘Cambrian Explosion’ and the subsequent ‘Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event.’ 20 Cambrian acritarch occurrences have been recorded in a great number of studies. In this paper, 21 published data on Cambrian acritarchs are assembled in order to reconstruct taxonomic diversity 22 trends that can be compared with the biodiversity of marine invertebrates. We compile a database 23 and calculate various diversity indices at global and regional (i.e. Gondwana or Baltica) scales. The 24 stratigraphic bins applied are at the level of the ten Cambrian stages, or of fourteen commonly used 25 biozones in a somewhat higher resolved scheme. -
The Two Phases of the Cambrian Explosion
Edinburgh Research Explorer The two phases of the Cambrian Explosion Citation for published version: Zhuravlev, AY & Wood, R 2018, 'The two phases of the Cambrian Explosion', Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34962-y Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1038/s41598-018-34962-y Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Scientific Reports General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 08. Oct. 2021 www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The two phases of the Cambrian Explosion Andrey Yu. Zhuravlev1 & Rachel A. Wood2 The dynamics of how metazoan phyla appeared and evolved – known as the Cambrian Explosion – Received: 18 July 2018 remains elusive. We present a quantitative analysis of the temporal distribution (based on occurrence Accepted: 24 October 2018 data of fossil species sampled in each time interval) of lophotrochozoan skeletal species (n = 430) Published: xx xx xxxx from the terminal Ediacaran to Cambrian Stage 5 (~545 – ~505 Million years ago (Ma)) of the Siberian Platform, Russia. -
Atmosphere–Ocean Oxygen and Productivity Dynamics During Early Animal Radiations
Atmosphere–ocean oxygen and productivity dynamics during early animal radiations Tais W. Dahla,1, James N. Connellya,b,DaLic,2, Artem Kouchinskyd, Benjamin C. Gille, Susannah Porterf, Adam C. Maloofg, and Martin Bizzarroa,b aGLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark; bCentre for Star and Planet Formation, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark; cState Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China; dDepartment of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden; eDepartment of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061; fDepartment of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; and gDepartment of Earth Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Edited by Edward A. Boyle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved August 7, 2019 (received for review January 23, 2019) The proliferation of large, motile animals 540 to 520 Ma has been change and could simply result from new biological innovations linked to both rising and declining O2 levels on Earth. To explore and styles of interactions (13). this conundrum, we reconstruct the global extent of seafloor ox- Attempts to test the food and oxygenation hypotheses have ygenation at approximately submillion-year resolution based on given ambiguous results (7, 9, 14, 15), in part due to insufficient uranium isotope compositions of 187 marine carbonates samples spatial and/or temporal resolution of the available paleo-O2 and from China, Siberia, and Morocco, and simulate O2 levels in the paleoproductivity proxies. To fill this gap, we compiled a record of atmosphere and surface oceans using a mass balance model con- global seafloor oxygenation constrained by high-resolution ura- strained by carbon, sulfur, and strontium isotopes in the same nium isotope data in marine carbonates from the Terreneuvian Se- sedimentary successions. -
Scientific/Semantic Data Specification and Dictionaries
OneGeology-Europe WP3 Data Specification ECP-2007-GEO-317001 OneGeology-Europe Scientific/Semantic Data Specification and Dictionaries - Generic Specification for Spatial Geological Data in Europe - Objective of this document This document represents the OneGeology-Europe Scientific Data Specification produced by Work Package 3. In addition it provides guidance on the vocabulary, the terms, their definitions and their relationships, which must be used by all OneGeology-Europe participants. An introductory explanation of the relevant parts of the GeoSciML data model along with guidance on the usage of GeoSciML is also included to provide initial context. Deliverable number D3.1, Version 2.0 Dissemination level Public Delivery date 31rd August 2010 Status Version 2.0 Author(s) WP3 Leader Kristine Asch WP 3 Core Team M. Bavec, S. Bergman, F. Perez Cerdan, P. Declercq, S. Hennings, D. Janjou, S. Kacer, M. Klicker, J.L. Laxton, M. Nironen, M. Pantaloni, C. Schubert Reviewed by A. Smith This project is funded under the eContentplus programme* A multilingual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, more usable and exploitable --------------------------------------- *OJL 79, 24.03.2005, p.1 02.09.2010 Version 2.0 1/137 OneGeology-Europe WP3 Data Specification Executive Summary OneGeology Europe (1G-E) is delivering a web accessible, semantically and technically interoperable geological dataset, with progress towards harmonisation, for the whole of Europe at 1:1 million scale. This is based on the individual geological datasets held by each geological survey in Europe, and which may differ considerably with respect to their contents, description and geometry. To make these data interoperable is a considerable task and 1G-E Work Package 3 (WP3) is delivering the essential basis for that endeavour: the 1G-E Data Specification.