DOCSLIB.ORG

Unitedstatesdepartment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION – BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF BOTANICAL SPECIES Squaw Valley | Alpine Meadows Base-to-Base Gondola Project April 27, 2018 Prepared by: _________________________________ Date: ________________ Tammie Beyerl, Botanist, Ascent Environmental Reviewed by: _________________________________ Date: ________________ Susan Urie, Tahoe National Forest Zone Botanist SUMMARY OF EFFECTS Botanists conducted literature review, database searches, and review of Forest Service species lists to identify potentially occurring species, conducted protocol-level botanical surveys and habitat assessment, and evaluated the potential for the project alternatives to affect threatened, endangered, and sensitive plant. A No Impacts determination was made for seven species because they were determined to be absent from the study area. Eight other species were also not found in the study area; however, these species are difficult to find because they seldom produce sporophytes, the above-ground parts that allow these species to be identified, and they are all very small and easy to miss even when they do produce above-ground parts. Because absence of Bolander’s candle moss, upswept moonwort, scalloped moonwort, common moonwort, Mingan moonwort, western goblin, Bandow’s bog moss, and Santa Lucia dwarf-rush could not be confirmed, the project could affect a minimal amount of potential habitat for these Forest Service sensitive plant species. Table i summarizes effect determinations for the Squaw-Valley | Alpine Meadows Base-to-Base Gondola Project alternatives on Candidate and Sensitive Species for the Tahoe National Forest that were determined to have potential to occur in the study area as presented in Section 5, Effects of the Proposed Project. No Threatened, Endangered, or Proposed species have potential to occur in the study area because the study area is outside of the known range of these species; therefore, these species were not included in the effects analysis. Table i. Determination of Project Effects on Forest Service Region 5 Sensitive Species with Potential to Occur in the Study Area. Known to Suitable *Determination Special Occur in Habitat in Determination for the Three Species Status the Study the Project for No Action Action Area Area Alternatives Plants Boechera rigidissima FSS No Yes No Impacts No Impacts Galena Creek rockcress May impact individuals, but Botrychium ascendens not likely to FSS No Yes No Impacts upswept moonwort cause a trend to federal listing or loss of viability. May impact individuals, but Botrychium crenulatum not likely to FSS No Yes No Impacts scalloped moonwort cause a trend to federal listing or loss of viability. i Table i. Determination of Project Effects on Forest Service Region 5 Sensitive Species with Potential to Occur in the Study Area. Known to Suitable *Determination Special Occur in Habitat in Determination for the Three Species Status the Study the Project for No Action Action Area Area Alternatives May impact individuals, but Botrychium lunaria not likely to FSS No Yes No Impacts common moonwort cause a trend to federal listing or loss of viability. May impact individuals, but Botrychium minganense not likely to FSS No Yes No Impacts Mingan moonwort cause a trend to federal listing or loss of viability. May impact individuals, but Botrychium montanum not likely to FSS No Yes No Impacts western goblin cause a trend to federal listing or loss of viability. May impact individuals, but Bruchia bolanderi not likely to FSS No Yes No Impacts Bolander’s candle moss cause a trend to federal listing or loss of viability. Erigeron miser FSS No Yes No Impacts No Impacts starved daisy Eriogonum umbellatum var. torreyanum FSS No Yes No Impacts No Impacts Donner Pass buckwheat May impact individuals, but Helodium blandowii not likely to FSS No Yes No Impacts Bandow’s bog moss cause a trend to federal listing or loss of viability. May impact Juncus luciensis individuals, but FSS No Yes No Impacts Santa Lucia dwarf-rush not likely to cause a trend to ii Table i. Determination of Project Effects on Forest Service Region 5 Sensitive Species with Potential to Occur in the Study Area. Known to Suitable *Determination Special Occur in Habitat in Determination for the Three Species Status the Study the Project for No Action Action Area Area Alternatives federal listing or loss of viability. Lewisia kelloggii ssp. hutchisonii FSS No Yes No Impacts No Impacts Hutchison’s lewisia Lewisia kelloggii ssp. kelloggii FSS No Yes No Impacts No Impacts Kellogg’s lewisia Pinus albicaulis FSS No Yes No Impacts No Impacts whitebark Pine C Tauschia howellii FSS No Yes No Impacts No Impacts Howell’s tauschia *The effects determination is the same for the all three action alternatives because the species are not present in the study area or because only a minimal amount of potential habitat is present for the species and therefore the risk to them or their habitat is low under each alternative. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Current Management Direction ................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Summary of Current Management Direction ............................................................................... 3 3 Description of the Proposed Project ............................................................................................ 4 3.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Location and Extent ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Base to Base Gondola ................................................................................................................... 7 3.5 Gazex Avalanche Mitigation System............................................................................................. 7 4 Effects Analysis Methodology....................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Geographic Area Evaluated .......................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Species To Be Analyzed ................................................................................................................ 9 4.3 Analysis Methodology and Assumptions .................................................................................... 10 4.4 Data Sources ............................................................................................................................... 18 4.5 Type and Duration of Effects ...................................................................................................... 19 5 Effects of the Proposed Project .................................................................................................. 22 5.1 Galena Creek Rockcress .............................................................................................................. 23 5.2 Upswept, Scalloped, Common, and Mingan Moonworts, and Western Goblin ........................ 25 5.3 Bolander’s Candle Moss ............................................................................................................. 29 5.4 Starved Daisy .............................................................................................................................. 32 5.5 Donner Pass Buckwheat ............................................................................................................. 33 5.6 Santa Lucia Dwarf-Rush .............................................................................................................. 34 5.7 Hutchison’s Lewisia and Kellogg’s Lewisia .................................................................................. 36 5.8 Whitebark Pine ........................................................................................................................... 37 5.9 Howell’s Tauschia ....................................................................................................................... 39 5.10 Other Botanical Resources ......................................................................................................... 41 6 Compliance with Current Management Direction ..................................................................... 41 7 Summary of Determinations ...................................................................................................... 41 8 Summary of Resource Protection Measures .............................................................................. 42 9 References .................................................................................................................................. 43 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Comparison of Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 6 Table 2. List of Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate and Forest Service Sensitive Botanical Species Known to Occur or with Suitable Habitat on Tahoe National Forest as of August 29, 2017 .........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Plant List Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail

    Plant List Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail

    *Non-native Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail Plant List as of 7/12/2016 compiled by Tanya Harvey T24S.R3E.S33;T25S.R3E.S4 westerncascades.com FERNS & ALLIES Pseudotsuga menziesii Ribes lacustre Athyriaceae Tsuga heterophylla Ribes sanguineum Athyrium filix-femina Tsuga mertensiana Ribes viscosissimum Cystopteridaceae Taxaceae Rhamnaceae Cystopteris fragilis Taxus brevifolia Ceanothus velutinus Dennstaedtiaceae TREES & SHRUBS: DICOTS Rosaceae Pteridium aquilinum Adoxaceae Amelanchier alnifolia Dryopteridaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea Holodiscus discolor Polystichum imbricans (Sambucus mexicana, S. cerulea) Prunus emarginata (Polystichum munitum var. imbricans) Sambucus racemosa Rosa gymnocarpa Polystichum lonchitis Berberidaceae Rubus lasiococcus Polystichum munitum Berberis aquifolium (Mahonia aquifolium) Rubus leucodermis Equisetaceae Berberis nervosa Rubus nivalis Equisetum arvense (Mahonia nervosa) Rubus parviflorus Ophioglossaceae Betulaceae Botrychium simplex Rubus ursinus Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Sceptridium multifidum (Alnus sinuata) Sorbus scopulina (Botrychium multifidum) Caprifoliaceae Spiraea douglasii Polypodiaceae Lonicera ciliosa Salicaceae Polypodium hesperium Lonicera conjugialis Populus tremuloides Pteridaceae Symphoricarpos albus Salix geyeriana Aspidotis densa Symphoricarpos mollis Salix scouleriana Cheilanthes gracillima (Symphoricarpos hesperius) Salix sitchensis Cryptogramma acrostichoides Celastraceae Salix sp. (Cryptogramma crispa) Paxistima myrsinites Sapindaceae Selaginellaceae (Pachystima myrsinites)
  • 45Th Anniversary Year

    45Th Anniversary Year

    VOLUME 45, NO. 1 Spring 2021 Journal of the Douglasia WASHINGTON NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY th To promote the appreciation and 45 conservation of Washington’s native plants Anniversary and their habitats through study, education, Year and advocacy. Spring 2021 • DOUGLASIA Douglasia VOLUME 45, NO. 1 SPRING 2021 journal of the washington native plant society WNPS Arthur R. Kruckberg Fellows* Clay Antieau Lou Messmer** President’s Message: William Barker** Joe Miller** Nelsa Buckingham** Margaret Miller** The View from Here Pamela Camp Mae Morey** Tom Corrigan** Brian O. Mulligan** by Keyna Bugner Melinda Denton** Ruth Peck Ownbey** Lee Ellis Sarah Reichard** Dear WNPS Members, Betty Jo Fitzgerald** Jim Riley** Mary Fries** Gary Smith For those that don’t Amy Jean Gilmartin** Ron Taylor** know me I would like Al Hanners** Richard Tinsley Lynn Hendrix** Ann Weinmann to introduce myself. I Karen Hinman** Fred Weinmann grew up in a small town Marie Hitchman * The WNPS Arthur R. Kruckeberg Fellow Catherine Hovanic in eastern Kansas where is the highest honor given to a member most of my time was Art Kermoade** by our society. This title is given to Don Knoke** those who have made outstanding spent outside explor- Terri Knoke** contributions to the understanding and/ ing tall grass prairie and Arthur R. Kruckeberg** or preservation of Washington’s flora, or woodlands. While I Mike Marsh to the success of WNPS. Joy Mastrogiuseppe ** Deceased love the Midwest, I was ready to venture west Douglasia Staff WNPS Staff for college. I earned Business Manager a Bachelor of Science Acting Editor Walter Fertig Denise Mahnke degree in Wildlife Biol- [email protected] 206-527-3319 [email protected] ogy from Colorado State Layout Editor University, where I really Mark Turner Office and Volunteer Coordinator [email protected] Elizabeth Gage got interested in native [email protected] plants.
  • Botany Biological Evaluation

    Botany Biological Evaluation

    APPENDIX I Botany Biological Evaluation Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi Page 1 of 35 for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project November 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE – FOREST SERVICE LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project El Dorado County, CA Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi PREPARED BY: ENTRIX, Inc. DATE: November 2009 APPROVED BY: DATE: _____________ Name, Forest Botanist, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR REQUIREMENTS One population of a special-status bryophyte, three-ranked hump-moss (Meesia triquetra), was observed in the survey area during surveys on June 30, 2008 and August 28, 2008. The proposed action will not affect the moss because the population is located outside the project area where no action is planned. The following species of invasive or noxious weeds were identified during surveys of the Project area: cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare); Klamathweed (Hypericum perforatum); oxe-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and common mullein (Verbascum Thapsus). The threat posed by these weed populations would not increase if the proposed action is implemented. An inventory and assessment of invasive and noxious weeds in the survey area is presented in the Noxious Weed Risk Assessment for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project (ENTRIX 2009). Based on the description of the proposed action and the evaluation contained herein, we have determined the following: There would be no significant effect to plant species listed as threatened, endangered, proposed for listing, or candidates under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), administered by the U.S.
  • Monument Rock Wilderness Baker County, OR T14S R36E S20, 21, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34 Compiled by Paul Slichter

    Monument Rock Wilderness Baker County, OR T14S R36E S20, 21, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34 Compiled by Paul Slichter

    Monument Rock Wilderness Baker County, OR T14S R36E S20, 21, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34 Compiled by Paul Slichter. Updated January 9, 2011 Flora Northwest: http://science.halleyhosting.com Common Name Scientific Name Family Gray's Lovage Ligusticum grayi Apiaceae Mountain Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza berteroi Apiaceae Western Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza occidentalis Apiaceae Purple Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza purpurea ? Apiaceae Sierra Snake Root Sanicula graveolens Apiaceae Yarrow Achillea millefolium Asteraceae Western Boneset Ageratina occidentalis Asteraceae Orange Agoseris Agoseris aurantiaca Asteraceae Mountain Agoseris Agoseris monticola? Asteraceae Rosy Pussytoes Antennaria rosea Asteraceae Heart-leaf Arnica Arnica cordifolia Asteraceae Hairy Arnica Arnica mollis Asteraceae Big Sagebrush Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana Asteraceae Leafy Aster ? Symphyotrichum foliaceum ? Asteraceae Green Horsebrush Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus Asteraceae Long-leaved Hawksbeard Crepis acuminata Asteraceae Gray Hawksbeard Crepis intermedia Asteraceae Green Rabbitbrush Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus (ssp. ?) Asteraceae Bloomer's Daisy Erigeron bloomeri v. bloomeri Asteraceae Cutleaf Daisy Erigeron compositus v. discoidea Asteraceae Eaton's Shaggy Fleabane Erigeron eatonii v. villosus Asteraceae Subalpine Daisy Erigeron glacialis Asteraceae Woolly Sunflower Eriophyllum lanatum v. integrifolium Asteraceae Rabbitbrush Goldenweed Ericameria bloomeri? Asteraceae Greene's Goldenweed Ericameria greenii Asteraceae White-flowered Hawkweed Hieracium albiflorum? Asteraceae Scouler's
  • Griffith Park Rare Plant Survey

    Griffith Park Rare Plant Survey

    Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. EIN 72-1598095 Daniel S. Cooper, President 5850 W. 3rd St. #167 Los Angeles, CA 90036 (323) 397-3562 [email protected] Griffith Park Rare Plant Survey Plummer's mariposa-lily Calochortus plummerae (CNPS 1B.2) blooms near Skyline Trail in the northeastern corner of Griffith Park, 26 May 2010 (ph. DSC). Prepared by: Daniel S. Cooper Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. October 2010 1 Part I. Summary of Findings Part II (species accounts) begins after p. 26. We present information on extant occurrences of 15 special-status species, subspecies and/or varieties of vascular plants in Griffith Park and contiguous open space, including three for which no known local specimen existed prior to this study: slender mariposa-lily (Calochortus clavatus var. gracilis; CNPS 1B.2), Humboldt lily (Lilium humboldtii var. ocellatum; CNPS 4.2), and Hubby's phacelia (Phacelia hubbyi; CNPS 4.2). Using lists developed by local botanists, we document - from specimens or digital photographs - extant occurrences of nearly 40 additional plant taxa felt to be of conservation concern in the eastern Santa Monica Mountains, including 16 for which no prior specimen existed for the park or surrounding open space. We also identify several dozen taxa known from the specimen record but unconfirmed in the park in recent years. From this information, we discuss patterns of occurrence of rare plants in the park, drawing attention to "hotspots" for rare species diversity, such as Spring Canyon and Royce Canyon, and identify areas, particularly in the northeastern corner of the park and along the southeastern border, where rare plants are relatively poorly represented in the landscape.
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern

    Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern

    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
  • Riverside State Park

    Riverside State Park

    Provisonal Report Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park Pacific Biodiversity Institute 2 Provisonal Report Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park Peter H. Morrison [email protected] George Wooten [email protected] Juliet Rhodes [email protected] Robin O’Quinn, Ph.D. [email protected] Hans M. Smith IV [email protected] January 2009 Pacific Biodiversity Institute P.O. Box 298 Winthrop, Washington 98862 509-996-2490 Recommended Citation Morrison, P.H., G. Wooten, J. Rhodes, R. O’Quinn and H.M. Smith IV, 2008. Provisional Report: Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park. Pacific Biodiversity Institute, Winthrop, Washington. 433 p. Acknowledgements Diana Hackenburg and Alexis Monetta assisted with entering and checking the data we collected into databases. The photographs in this report were taken by Peter Morrison, Robin O’Quinn, Geroge Wooten, and Diana Hackenburg. Project Funding This project was funded by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 3 Executive Summary Pacific Biodiversity Institute (PBI) conducted a rare plant and vegetation survey of Riverside State Park (RSP) for the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (WSPRC). RSP is located in Spokane County, Washington. A large portion of the park is located within the City of Spokane. RSP extends along both sides of the Spokane River and includes upland areas on the basalt plateau above the river terraces. The park also includes the lower portion of the Little Spokane River and adjacent uplands. The park contains numerous trails, campgrounds and other recreational facilities. The park receives a tremendous amount of recreational use from the nearby population.
  • Vascular Flora of the Liebre Mountains, Western Transverse Ranges, California Steve Boyd Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

    Vascular Flora of the Liebre Mountains, Western Transverse Ranges, California Steve Boyd Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 18 | Issue 2 Article 15 1999 Vascular flora of the Liebre Mountains, western Transverse Ranges, California Steve Boyd Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Boyd, Steve (1999) "Vascular flora of the Liebre Mountains, western Transverse Ranges, California," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 18: Iss. 2, Article 15. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol18/iss2/15 Aliso, 18(2), pp. 93-139 © 1999, by The Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA 91711-3157 VASCULAR FLORA OF THE LIEBRE MOUNTAINS, WESTERN TRANSVERSE RANGES, CALIFORNIA STEVE BOYD Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden 1500 N. College Avenue Claremont, Calif. 91711 ABSTRACT The Liebre Mountains form a discrete unit of the Transverse Ranges of southern California. Geo­ graphically, the range is transitional to the San Gabriel Mountains, Inner Coast Ranges, Tehachapi Mountains, and Mojave Desert. A total of 1010 vascular plant taxa was recorded from the range, representing 104 families and 400 genera. The ratio of native vs. nonnative elements of the flora is 4:1, similar to that documented in other areas of cismontane southern California. The range is note­ worthy for the diversity of Quercus and oak-dominated vegetation. A total of 32 sensitive plant taxa (rare, threatened or endangered) was recorded from the range. Key words: Liebre Mountains, Transverse Ranges, southern California, flora, sensitive plants. INTRODUCTION belt and Peirson's (1935) handbook of trees and shrubs. Published documentation of the San Bernar­ The Transverse Ranges are one of southern Califor­ dino Mountains is little better, limited to Parish's nia's most prominent physiographic features.
  • Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County

    Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County

    A PPENDIX II Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX II. Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County Family Scientific Name Common Name FERN AND FERN ALLIES Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken family Pteridium aquilinum var.pubescens Bracken fern Dryopteridaceae Wood fern family Athyrium alpestre var. americanum Alpine lady fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Lady fern Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Cliff sword fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricate sword fern Polystichum kruckebergii Kruckeberg’s hollyfern Polystichum lonchitis Northern hollyfern Polystichum munitum Sword fern Equisetaceae Horsetail family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Scouring rush Equisetum laevigatum Smooth horsetail Isoetaceae Quillwort family Isoetes bolanderi Bolander’s quillwort Isoetes howellii Howell’s quillwort Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort Lycopodiaceae Club-moss family Lycopodiella inundata Bog club-moss Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita ssp. vestita Water clover Pilularia americana American pillwort Ophioglossaceae Adder’s-tongue family Botrychium multifidum Leathery grapefern Polypodiaceae Polypody family Polypodium hesperium Western polypody Pteridaceae Brake family Adiantum aleuticum Five-finger maidenhair Adiantum jordanii Common maidenhair fern Aspidotis densa Indian’s dream Cheilanthes cooperae Cooper’s
  • Cushion-Plant Vegetation on Public Lands in the Blm Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming

    Cushion-Plant Vegetation on Public Lands in the Blm Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming

    CUSHION-PLANT VEGETATION ON PUBLIC LANDS IN THE BLM ROCK SPRINGS FIELD OFFICE, WYOMING Final Report for Assistance Agreement KAA010012, Task Order No. TO-13 between the BLM Rock Springs Field Office, and the University of Wyoming, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database By George P. Jones Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming Laramie, Wyoming October 18, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Sample Area Selection ................................................................................................................ 3 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................ 4 Data Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 5 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 7
  • Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var

    Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var

    Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Cicuta douglasii poison parsnip 3 3 3 Cymopterus cinerarius alpine cymopterus 3 Cymopterus terebinthinus var. terebinth pteryxia 3 3 petraeus Ligusticum grayi Gray’s lovage 3 Lomatium dissectum fern-leaf 3 3 3 3 var. multifidum lomatium Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. desert biscuitroot 3 fimbriatum Plant List Lomatium mohavense Mojave parsley 3 3 Lomatium nevadense Nevada parsley 3 var. nevadense Lomatium rigidum prickly parsley 3 Taxonomy and nomenclature in this species list are based on Lomatium torreyi Sierra biscuitroot 3 western sweet- the Jepson Manual Online as of February 2011. Changes in Osmorhiza occidentalis 3 3 ADOXACEAE–ASTERACEAE cicely taxonomy and nomenclature are ongoing. Some site lists are Perideridia bolanderi Bolander’s 3 3 more complete than others; all of them should be considered a ssp. bolanderi yampah Lemmon’s work in progress. Species not native to California are designated Perideridia lemmonii 3 yampah with an asterisk (*). Please visit the Inyo National Forest and Perideridia parishii ssp. Parish’s yampah 3 3 Bureau of Land Management Bishop Resource Area websites latifolia for periodic updates. Podistera nevadensis Sierra podistera 3 Sphenosciadium ranger’s buttons 3 3 3 3 3 capitellatum APOCYNACEAE Dogbane Apocynum spreading 3 3 androsaemifolium dogbane Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Apocynum cannabinum hemp 3 3 ADOXACEAE Muskroot Humboldt Asclepias cryptoceras 3 Sambucus nigra ssp.
  • Biological Evaluation for Pacific Southwest Region (R5) Sensitive Botanical Species For

    Biological Evaluation for Pacific Southwest Region (R5) Sensitive Botanical Species For

    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FOR PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGION (R5) SENSITIVE BOTANICAL SPECIES FOR JOSEPH CREEK FOREST HEALTH PROJECT MODOC NATIONAL FOREST WARNER MOUNTAIN RANGER DISTRICT September 14, 2017 Prepared by: Heidi Guenther 9.14.2017 Heidi Guenther, Forest Botanist Date Modoc National Forest BOTANY BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION JOSEPH CREEK FOREST HEALTH PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 3 Proposed Project and Description ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Proposed Action.............................................................................................................. 2 3.3 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 2 4 Species Considered and Species Evaluated ........................................................................ 4 5 Analysis Process and Affected Environment ...................................................................... 4 5.1 Analysis Process.............................................................................................................. 4 6 Consultation..........................................................................................................................