DOCSLIB.ORG

UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Legitimacy’s Stutter: The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge and Deliberation’s Uncertain Solution Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sm1z2q2 Author Ward, Alan Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Legitimacy’s Stutter: The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge and Deliberation’s Uncertain Solution A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Alan Ward Committee in charge: Professor Tracy B. Strong, Chair Professor Gerry Mackie, Co-Chair Professor Harvey Goldman Professor Marcel Henaff Professor Andy Lamey 2017 The Dissertation of Alan Ward is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Co-Chair Chair University of California, San Diego 2017 iii DEDICATION Writing a dissertation is hard. I don’t know anyone who successfully wrote one without sometimes feeling as though they were running into a brick wall. Over. And over. And over. But some people made the process less difficult. These are the people who put padding on the wall, bandaged my forehead, and encouraged me to keep banging. This dissertation is dedicated to them. First, thanks go to my committee – Tracy Strong, Gerry Mackie, Harvey Goldman, Marcel Hénaff, and Andy Lamey. The breadth and depth of their knowledge baffles me. At this point I just take for granted that when they speak, whether in a group setting or one-on- one, I’m about to hear something perceptive and liable to force me to rethink some of my positions. Thank you for your professionalism, your help, and for making me smarter. The same goes to Prof. Isaac Balbus, who supervised my Masters thesis at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Ike taught me that it’s possible to be critical while being kind. I also want to thank my grad student cohort and the friends I made in San Diego. My friends Kathryn and Rhys fed me, laughed with me, and made sure I never had to have a pint alone. Rick Malabo helped me clear my jumbled thoughts by going on frequent walks and showing me unrelenting kindness. Marc Rolnik challenged me, but did so as a true friend, providing wine and chocolate as we debated politics. Konstantin Ash entertained and one-upped my ridiculous assertions until our talks reached the level of sublime absurdity. Thanks to Simone Günther, who taught me many lessons, including humility by tying me in a pizza-eating contest. Finally, my relationship with Rachel MacCratic has been a major influence on my thought. She is one of the most outsized and original personalities I met in any field, and I can’t imagine my time in San Diego without her. Thanks go to Dr. Andrew Sward for all the laughs and rants. Sara Wong supported me during the bad times and celebrated with me during the good ones. I cannot thank her enough for being a part of my life. Peninah Rosenblum: you have filled my life with joy and have encouraged me to be a better man. I’m so happy you’re my partner. Thanks to Mark Bigney, whose brilliance and almost frightening uprightness has made him my stock character when discussing intelligence or Kant’s categorical imperative. Luiza Axioti has been a model of integrity and courage. Marc-A has shown me what it means to combine compassion, an analytic mind, and an assertive drive for novelty. In a very real sense, I never would have gone to graduate school had it not been for Marc Peridis, Pirada Chamandy, and Jennifer Teoh. Thank you. Erat, Darc, Jeron: seeing you is always a highlight when I visit Montreal. It wouldn’t be home without you. Thanks for the hospitality and, most of all, the ridiculousness. Finally, this work is especially dedicated to my family. Andrea and Jason: I love and admire both of you. Simone and Gwen: I couldn’t ask for more wonderful nieces. You make being an uncle fun. Mom and dad, thank you so, so much for loving me and teaching me so much. I’m proud to have you as parents. <3 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE…………………………………………………………………………iii DEDICATION………………………………………………………………………………..iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................... v VITA ....................................................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION .............................................................................. ix Chapter 1: The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge.................................................................... 1 I. Legitimate Authority and Philosophical Anarchism ..................................................... 4 II. Types of Philosophical Anarchism ............................................................................... 11 II.1 Wolff and Simmons .................................................................................................... 11 II.2 “My” Country and the Political .................................................................................. 17 III. Simmons vs. Simmons.................................................................................................. 22 IV. Paths Not Taken: Alternative Responses to Simmons .............................................. 27 IV.1 Alternative Responses ............................................................................................... 27 IV.2 Upshot ....................................................................................................................... 32 V. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 33 Chapter 2: Gratitude ................................................................................................................. 37 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 37 II. Description ..................................................................................................................... 38 II.1. What kind of relationship? Filial vs. Transactional Gratitude ................................... 38 II.2 Psychological and Moral Gratitude ............................................................................ 46 III. Critiques ........................................................................................................................ 49 III.1 Against filial gratitude .............................................................................................. 49 III.2 Intentionality ............................................................................................................. 52 III.3 The Value of Gifts ..................................................................................................... 56 III.4 Goods relative to which bads? Gratitude and counterfactuals .................................. 62 Chapter 3: Fair Play .................................................................................................................. 70 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 70 II. The Hart-Rawls Theory and Its Challenges ................................................................ 70 II.1 Original formulation ................................................................................................... 70 II.2 Objections to the original formulations ...................................................................... 73 III. Klosko’s Theory ........................................................................................................... 76 III.1 Klosko's Three Criteria ............................................................................................. 76 III.2 Discretionary Goods ................................................................................................. 82 IV. Challenges to Klosko .................................................................................................... 87 IV.1 Evil but fair regimes ................................................................................................. 88 IV.2 The reliance on other theories ................................................................................... 92 IV.3 Ambiguous empirical data ........................................................................................ 94 IV.4 Barely acceptable choices and symbolic violence .................................................... 96 V. Green and Reasonable Envy ........................................................................................ .99 VI. Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 103 Chapter 4: Voting and Consent .............................................................................................. 105 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 105 II. Consent ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calculated for the Use of the State Of
    3i'R 317.3M31 H41 A Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2009 with funding from University of IVIassachusetts, Boston http://www.archive.org/details/pocketalmanackfo1839amer MASSACHUSETTS REGISTER, AND mmwo states ©alrntiar, 1839. ALSO CITY OFFICERS IN BOSTON, AND OTHER USEFUL INFORMATION. BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY JAMES LORING, 13 2 Washington Street. ECLIPSES IN 1839. 1. The first will be a great and total eclipse, on Friday March 15th, at 9h. 28m. morning, but by reason of the moon's south latitude, her shadow will not touch any part of North America. The course of the general eclipse will be from southwest to north- east, from the Pacific Ocean a little west of Chili to the Arabian Gulf and southeastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. The termination of this grand and sublime phenomenon will probably be witnessed from the summit of some of those stupendous monuments of ancient industry and folly, the vast and lofty pyramids on the banks of the Nile in lower Egypt. The principal cities and places that will be to- tally shadowed in this eclipse, are Valparaiso, Mendoza, Cordova, Assumption, St. Salvador and Pernambuco, in South America, and Sierra Leone, Teemboo, Tombucto and Fezzan, in Africa. At each of these places the duration of total darkness will be from one to six minutes, and several of the planets and fixed stars will probably be visible. 2. The other will also be a grand and beautiful eclipse, on Satur- day, September 7th, at 5h. 35m. evening, but on account of the Mnon's low latitude, and happening so late in the afternoon, no part of it will be visible in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: WHEN APOLOGIES WORK
    ABSTRACT Title of thesis: WHEN APOLOGIES WORK: THE BENEFITS OF MATCHING APOLOGY CONTENT TO VICTIMS AND CONTEXT Ryan Fehr, Master of Arts, 2007 Thesis Directed by: Dr. Michele Gelfand Department of Psychology Research shows that apologies are useful social tools. They help people to resolve conflict, reduce feelings of aggression, and foster forgiveness. Yet common sense tells us that all apologies are not created equal. From one to the next, they are likely to contain different verbal elements, to be offered to different people, and to be given under different circumstances. In each of these cases, an apology’s impact can be expected to change. To explore the boundaries of apology effectiveness, the current study asks four distinct questions. First, how effective are three different apology components (offers of compensation, expressions of concern, and acknowledgements of violated rules/norms) in eliciting forgiveness? Second, how does a victim’s self-construal (independent, relational, or collective) influence forgiveness of an offender? Third, does a victim’s self-construal moderate the effectiveness of different apology components? Finally, how does harm severity influence the effectiveness of long versus short apologies? To answer each of these questions, 171 undergraduate students participated in a policy capturing experiment. Regarding the role of apology components, all three components are found to positively affect forgiveness. Offers of compensation are shown to be the most effective, followed by expressions of concern and acknowledgments of violated rules/norms, respectively. Regarding the direct impact of the self, no significant effect was found. As for the moderating effect of the self on apology components, the independent self is found to strengthen the effectiveness of offers of compensation, the relational self is found to strengthen the effectiveness of both expressions of concern and acknowledgments of violated rules/norms, and the collective self is found to strengthen the effectiveness of acknowledgments of violated rules/norms.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Guessing – I
    Machine Guessing { I David Miller Department of Philosophy University of Warwick COVENTRY CV4 7AL UK e-mail: [email protected] ⃝c copyright D. W. Miller 2011{2018 Abstract According to Karl Popper, the evolution of science, logically, methodologically, and even psy- chologically, is an involved interplay of acute conjectures and blunt refutations. Like biological evolution, it is an endless round of blind variation and selective retention. But unlike biological evolution, it incorporates, at the stage of selection, the use of reason. Part I of this two-part paper begins by repudiating the common beliefs that Hume's problem of induction, which com- pellingly confutes the thesis that science is rational in the way that most people think that it is rational, can be solved by assuming that science is rational, or by assuming that Hume was irrational (that is, by ignoring his argument). The problem of induction can be solved only by a non-authoritarian theory of rationality. It is shown also that because hypotheses cannot be distilled directly from experience, all knowledge is eventually dependent on blind conjecture, and therefore itself conjectural. In particular, the use of rules of inference, or of good or bad rules for generating conjectures, is conjectural. Part II of the paper expounds a form of Popper's critical rationalism that locates the rationality of science entirely in the deductive processes by which conjectures are criticized and improved. But extreme forms of deductivism are rejected. The paper concludes with a sharp dismissal of the view that work in artificial intelligence, including the JSM method cultivated extensively by Victor Finn, does anything to upset critical rationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Prudence Hutton: How Apology Can Promote Exemplary Practices for Reducing Special Education Disputes Breakout Session Transcript
    Prudence Hutton: How Apology Can Promote Exemplary Practices for Reducing Special Education Disputes Breakout Session Transcript PRUDENCE HUTTON: Good afternoon. I’d like to welcome everyone to the last session of the day on apology. And I want to offer the first apology. I get the view of the river in the fall. You get me and the slides. The name of the program is How Apology Can Promote Exemplary Practices for Reducing Special Education Disputes. And the word can is a very operative verb there because the premise of my presentation today is it can, it should, but it doesn’t always. And there’s an opportunity for so, so, so much more in the CADRE community with across the board for using a lot, a lot more apologies. And this is for school districts and this is for parents and students alike. I come here today as part of a journey, and I want to share some of my story so there will be an understanding of why I am so interested and compelled and passionate about apologies. I am an attorney by training. Before law school, I had two very rewarding years working in a very prominent civil rights practice. After law school, I did labor negotiations, and there I was very, very committed to labor negotiations going away from strike for a strike meant failure. I then practiced in Las Vegas in a small practice where providing government services for the clients was extremely important, and the senior partner now is the majority speaker in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7, No. 4, Winter 1996 General Announcements
    Volume 7, No. 4, Winter 1996 General Announcements The Man and Nature Research Center, located at Odense University, Denmark, ends its five-year life in June 1997. The Center has been prominent on the European scene in environmental ethics and policy issues, producing some 100 working papers and many dozens of conferences and seminars in the field, hosting also many scholars from Europe and abroad. Many of these working papers remain available, as are some video productions. Information on the website is at http://www.hum.ou.dk/Center/Hollufgaard/index.html. A philosopher involved with the project is Finn Arler. Mailing address: Man and Nature: Humanities Research Center, Hollufgaard, Hestehaven 201, 5220 Odense SO, Denmark. Phone 45 6595 9493. Fax 45 6595 7766. The Syllabus Project, the most comprehensive and up-to-date source of information concerning course offerings in environmental philosophy and environmental ethics, is being supported by the International Society for Environmental Ethics, the Center for Environmental Philosophy, the Philosophy Documentation Center, and the Philosophy Department at Bowling Green State University. The materials can be accessed on the World Wide Web at: http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/phil/ISEE The project's goal is to collect information from throughout the world about what courses are taught, by whom, in which colleges and universities, and to make this available on website for teachers, administrators, students, prospective grad students, and so on. All teachers of such courses are requested to send copies of their syllabuses, course materials, Resumé, etc., preferrably by Email (disks should be text/ASCII only). As a last resort, send a paper-mail copy.
    [Show full text]
  • 'History, Method and Pluralism: a Re-Interpretation of Isaiah Berlin's
    HISTORY, METHOD, AND PLURALISM A Re-interpretation of Isaiah Berlin’s Political Thought Thesis submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by HAOYEH London School of Economics and Political Science 2005 UMI Number: U205195 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U205195 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 S 510 Abstract of the Thesis In the literature on Berlin to date, two broad approaches to study his political thought can be detected. The first is the piecemeal approach, which tends to single out an element of Berlin’s thought (for example, his distinction between negative liberty and positive liberty) for exposition or criticism, leaving other elements unaccounted. And the second is the holistic approach, which pays attention to the overall structure of Berlin’s thought as a whole, in particular the relation between his defence for negative liberty and pluralism. This thesis is to defend the holistic approach against the piecemeal approach, but its interpretation will differ from the two representative readings, offered by Claude J.
    [Show full text]
  • Swift's Tale of a Tub and the Mock Book Than Has Previously Been Apparent
    Warning Concerning Copyright Restrictions The Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. If electronic transmission of reserve material is used for purposes in excess of what constitutes "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. .... JONATHAN SWIFT AND THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BOOK EDITED BY PADDY BULLARD and JAMES McLAVERTY CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS IOO Pat Rogers 3 http://digitalmiscellaniesindex.org/ (accessed 25 July 2012). The editors of the Index kindly allowed the data in this chapter to be checked against a CHAPTER FIVE pre-publication version of their database. It is already clear that the Digital Miscellanies Index will show that Swift's poems were more widely reprinted Swift's Tale of a Tub and the mock book than has previously been apparent. 4 Johns, Piracy, pp. 42-4, III. Marcus Walsh 5 Cyprian Blagden, 1he Stationers' Company: A History I40J-I959 (London: Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1960), pp. 153-77. 6 Johns, Piracy, p. 111. 7 See Baines and Rogers, Curll, pp. 7, 140, 289-90. 8 Swift to Tooke, 29 June 1710, and Tooke to Swift, 10 July 1710, Woolley, Corr., vol. I, pp. 282-4. Jonathan Swift had no general objection to books and texts. He believed in, 9 Falconer Madan and W.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and the Common Humanity: Ethical and Institutional Concerns
    Globalization. Ethical and Institutional Concerns Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, Acta 7, Vatican City 2001 www.pass.va/content/dam/scienzesociali/pdf/acta7/acta7-ramirez2.pdf GLOBALIZATION AND THE COMMON HUMANITY: ETHICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS MINA M. RAMIREZ This Report tries to present a synthesis (without entering into the tech- nical aspects) of the phenomenon of globalization, underscoring the nega- tive and the positive aspects as well as the Challenges of Globalization gleaned from the topical discussions of this assembly with special reference to the most affected – the monetarily poor of the world. The Approach to Globalization The objective of the assembly is to highlight the findings of Social Science with regard to Globalization offering these to the Catholic Church for the development of her Christian Social Teachings (President E. Malinvaud). The approach should be balanced, avoiding two extreme attitudes: 1) to resist globalization without understanding its nuances, and/or 2) to subtly reduce it to one of its many aspects. As an Academy, the PASS wishes to contribute to the Church the positive and negative implications for devel- oping countries of Globalization through the analysis and critique of its underlying values and ethics. PASS at this stage is not looking for unanim- ity. It is rather challenging one’s certainty and bringing out ideas in its plu- rality. (Prof. L. Sabourin). A great task, it nevertheless is watching for con- verging points. Rev. Fr. Prof. Johannes Schasching, S.J. brought to light the historical evolution of Christian Social Teachings (CSTs), the Church’s actual point of view and latest development in relation to her all inclusive nature, address- ing herself not only to the hierarchy of the Church, but also to other church- es, all religions and all women and men of goodwill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apology | the B-Side | Night School | Madonna: Rebel Heart Tour | Betting on Zero Scene & Heard
    November-December 2017 VOL. 32 THE VIDEO REVIEW MAGAZINE FOR LIBRARIES N O . 6 IN THIS ISSUE One Week and a Day | Poverty, Inc. | The Apology | The B-Side | Night School | Madonna: Rebel Heart Tour | Betting on Zero scene & heard BAKER & TAYLOR’S SPECIALIZED A/V TEAM OFFERS ALL THE PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND EXPERTISE TO FULFILL YOUR LIBRARY PATRONS’ NEEDS. Learn more about Baker & Taylor’s Scene & Heard team: ELITE Helpful personnel focused exclusively on A/V products and customized services to meet continued patron demand PROFICIENT Qualified entertainment content buyers ensure frontlist and backlist titles are available and delivered on time SKILLED Supportive Sales Representatives with an average of 15 years industry experience DEVOTED Nationwide team of A/V processing staff ready to prepare your movie and music products to your shelf-ready specifications Experience KNOWLEDGEABLE Baker & Taylor is the Full-time staff of A/V catalogers, most experienced in the backed by their MLS degree and more than 43 years of media cataloging business; selling A/V expertise products to libraries since 1986. 800-775-2600 x2050 [email protected] www.baker-taylor.com Spotlight Review One Week and a Day and target houses that are likely to be empty while mourners are out. Eyal also goes to the HHH1/2 hospice where Ronnie died (and retrieves his Oscilloscope, 98 min., in Hebrew w/English son’s medical marijuana, prompting a later subtitles, not rated, DVD: scene in which he struggles to roll a joint for Publisher/Editor: Randy Pitman $34.99, Blu-ray: $39.99 the first time in his life), gets into a conflict Associate Editor: Jazza Williams-Wood Wr i t e r- d i r e c t o r with a taxi driver, and tries (unsuccessfully) to hide in the bushes when his neighbors show Editorial Assistant: Christopher Pitman Asaph Polonsky’s One Week and a Day is a up with a salad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capability Approach As Political Philosophy
    New Directions for the Capability Approach: Deliberative Democracy and Republicanism Rutger Claassen Published in: Res Publica 15(4)(2009): 421-428 Review essay on: John. M. Alexander, Capabilities and Social Justice: The Political Philosophy of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008, 187 pp David A. Crocker, Ethics of Global development. Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 416 pp. The capability approach, developed by economist Amartya Sen and philosopher Martha Nussbaum in the 1980s and 1990s, has had an impact on two main fields of study. First it has brought a distinctive set of tools and ideas to research on human development, well-being and quality of life. David Crocker’s Ethics of Global Development presents itself as a contribution to this field. More specifically, Crocker proposes his version of capability theory as a guide to the emerging discipline of ‘international development ethics’. A second field in which the capability approach has figured extensively is that of theories of justice in political philosophy. Both Sen and Nussbaum have stressed that the capability approach is not a full theory of justice yet. More work needs to be done to make ‘equality of capabilities’ a conception of justice competing with theories of justice like those of John Rawls, Robert Nozick and Ronald Dworkin. John Alexander’s Capabilities and Social Justice aims to be a philosophical evaluation of the capability approach’s contribution in this field. Both books are heavily indebted to Sen and Nussbaum and extensively discuss their arguments. Readers interested in Sen and Nussbaum’s work on capabilities will therefore find much of interest in both books.
    [Show full text]
  • Eidos Fecha De Recepción: Diciembre 1 De 2010 ISSN 1692-8857 Fecha De Aceptación: Enero 21 De 2011 Issne 2011-7477
    eidos Fecha de recepción: diciembre 1 de 2010 ISSN 1692-8857 Fecha de aceptación: enero 21 de 2011 ISSNe 2011-7477 PRAGMATISM IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY AND RESEARCH SHANE J. RALSTON Penn State University, Department of Philosophy [email protected]. RESUMEN Este artículo examina la literatura reciente sobre la intersección entre pragmatismo filosófico y relaciones internacionales (RI), incluyendo la teoría y la metodología de investigación de las RI. Se sostiene que uno de los obstáculos que motivan las teorías y metodologías pragmatistas de las RI es la dificultad de definir el pragmatismo, en particular si existe la necesidad de una definición más genérica de pragmatismo, o una más específica que se vincule con las metas de teó ricos e investigadores de las rela cio nes internacionales. Aunque el prag matismo filosófico no se ajusta fá cilmente a ninguno de los marcos teóricos tradicionales en RI, aquí esbozo una teoría pragmatista de las RI que se inspira en los tra- bajos de John Dewey y Richard Rorty. Sobre la metodología de las RI, señalo de qué manera la combina ción del pragmatismo filosófico y los métodos de investigación en RI se han beneficiado enormemente de las contribuciones de algunos prag matistas líderes de las RI y que hay signos de esperanza en que dicha relación puede enriquecerse pos teriormente. PALAB R AS CLAVE Pragmatismo, relaciones internacionales, investigación, teoría, práctica, John Dewey, Richard Rorty. ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is exami ne the recent literature on the intersec- tion between philosophical pragmatism and International Relations (IR), including IR theory and IR re search methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach and Animal Rights
    Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach and Animal Rights How animal capabilities would be the best foundation of rights Fiona Korthals Altes S1044141 Words: 22277 Supervisor: Prof. dr. G. F. Newey Nussaus Capailities Approach and Animal Rights Introduction The rights of animals are not typically a concern for most people. Animals have lived amongst human-beings as long as we can remember, sharing living space and communities and changing each other s lives for better or worse. The interest for animal rights has strongly developed in the last few centuries, with more people arguing that we should take animals and their interests into account. They are not merely means to an end, but they are living beings, with an interest to live a life worth living. This development can be seen in, for example, the rise of political parties that have animal rights and environmental issues as their main objective. In Europe, the rise of political animal parties has been apparent, with right now around 10 parties in different countries who are vouching for the importance of animal justice.1 Even more movements are being introduced, like the Animal Euro 7. This is the coalition of 7 of the before mentioned parties, who are together trying to win seats in the European Parliament to fight against speciesism and for more animal rights throughout Europe.2 Apart from political parties, there are numerous non-governmental organizations that make an effort for animals. One of the most important ones is PETA, the largest animal rights organization in the world. It is safe to say that people are increasingly more concerned with animal rights.
    [Show full text]