Environmental Impact Assessment Report

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

FOR

PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX FOR BULK DRUGS AND INTERMEDIATES MANUFACTURING UNIT AT

Polt No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase-IV TALUK: ANEKAL DISTRICT: BENGALURU, URBAN STATE: KARNATAKA COUNTRY: INDIA

BY M/s. CIPLA Limited

[Project termed under schedule 5(f): Category ‘A’ Synthetic organic chemicals. ToR vide file no. SEIAA 33 IND 2016, dated: 24th Sep, 2016.

Prepared by

M/s. HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LTD, CHENNAI (NABET Accredited vide Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA0083 & MoEF Recognized Lab vide F. No. Q-15018/13/2016-CPW)

MAY, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The following personnel are gratefully acknowledged for their fullest support in collection, compilation of needful data regarding the project and kind cooperation in fulfilling the report on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of M/s. CIPLA Limited, Bengaluru.

CIPLA Limited,

Mr. Subrat Satpathy – Site Head

Mr. Kapini Gowda - EHS Declaration of Experts contributing to the EIA

I hereby certify that I was involved in the EIA report for the project titled “ Proposed Change in Product Mix for Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit” at Plot. No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase-IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was a part of the EIA team in the following capacity that developed the above EIA with the support of the following Team Members.

EIA Co-ordinator Team Member

Name: Dr.J.R. Moses Name: Mr. Abhishek Moses

Signature: Signature:

Date: 08/05/2019 Date: 08/05/2019

Contact Information: Hubert Enviro CareSystems Pvt.Ltd., # A-21, Phase III, Behind Lion Clube School, Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Area, Guindy, Chennai –600032. Tamil Nadu, India. Email: [email protected] Website: www.hecs.in

Functional Area Experts (FAEs):

Functional Signature Duration of S. No. Name of the Expert Areas Involvement FAE Dr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date

TM Oct 2016 – Till date Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru AP Mr. Abhishek Moses June 2016 – Till date 1. Mr. B. Tamil Selvan June 2016 – Till date Mr. Harsha Vardhan Feb 2017 – Till date

Mr. N. Varadharajan Sep 2016 – Till date

Mrs T. Rajani Aug 2017 – Till date

FAE Dr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date

TM Mr. Abhishek Moses June 2016 – Till date

2. AQ` Feb 2017 – Till date Mr. Harsha Vardhan

Mr. B. Tamil Selvan June 2016 – Till date

FAE Dr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date

TM Oct 2016 – Till date Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru

Mr. Abhishek Moses June 2016 – Till date

3. WP Mr. Chengalvarayan Oct 2016 – Till date

Mr. B. Tamil Selvan June 2016 – Till date

Mr. Harsha Vardhan Feb 2017 – Till date Mrs T. Rajani Aug 2017 – Till date

FAE June 2017 – Till date Mr. Venkateswarlu 4. LU TM Sep 2016 – Till date Mr. N. Varadharajan FAE 5. NV March – May 2017 Mr. Brijesh Kumar TM Oct 2016 – Till date Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru

Mr. N. Varadharajan Sep 2016 – Till date

FAE Oct 2016 – Till date Mr. A. Manoharan

TM June 2016 – Till date Dr. Rajkumar Samuel 6. EB Mr. B. Tamil Selvan June 2016 – Till date

Mrs. Sheetal Feb 2018 to till date

FAE 7. SE Aug 2016 – June 2017 Mr. V. Dhivakar

FAE 8. HG Mr. Mallikarjuna Rao Oct 2018 to Till date

FAE June 2016 – Till date Mr. A. Manoharan 9. SHW TM Mrs T. Rajani Aug 2017 – Till date

FAE June 2016 – Till date Dr. J R Moses

TM June 2016 – Till date Mr. Abhishek Moses 10. RH Feb 2017 – Till date Mr. Harsha Vardhan

Aug 2017 – Till date Mrs T. Rajani

AP - Air pollution monitoring, prevention and control AQ - Meteorology, air quality modeling and prediction WP - Water pollution monitoring, prevention and control LU - Land use NV - Noise & Vibration EB - Ecology and biodiversity SE - Socio-economics HG - Hydrology, ground water and water conservation SHW - Solid and hazardous waste management RH - Risk assessment and hazards management Declaration by the Head of the Accredited Consultant Organization

I, Dr. J R Moses hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA for the “Proposed Change in Product Mix for Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit” at Plot. No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase-IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State, by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I also confirm that I shall be fully accountable for any misleading information mentioned in this statement.

Signature: Date: 08/05/2019

Name: Dr. J.R Moses Designation: CEO Name of the EIA Consultant Organization: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... ii 1. Introduction...... 2 1.1 Project Background...... 2 1.2 Project Proponent...... 2 1.3 Proposed Project ...... 2 1.4 Justification & Need for the Project...... 3 1.5 Location of the project site...... 3 1.5.1 Sites considered for the project location ...... 6 1.6 Need for the EIA Study...... 6 1.6.1 Project Screening and ToR ...... 6 1.6.2 EIA Study...... 8 1.6.3 EIA Cost...... 8 1.7 Overview of the Methodology of the EIA Study...... 9 1.8 Structure of the EIA Study...... 12 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION...... 15 2.1 Type of Project...... 15 2.2 Size or Magnitude of operation...... 21 2.3 Project Cost...... 26 2.4 Process Description...... 26 2.5 Resource Requirements...... 26 2.5.1 Raw Materials ...... 26 2.5.2 Land Details...... 33 2.5.3 Water Requirement ...... 34 2.5.4 Power Requirement...... 35 2.5.5 Manpower Requirement...... 35 2.6 Pollution Control Measures ...... 35 2.6.1 Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control ...... 35 2.6.2 Odour Control ...... 36 2.6.3 Noise Pollution...... 36 2.6.4 Waste Water Generation and Disposal Details ...... 36 2.6.5 Hazardous and Solid waste Management ...... 38 2.6.5.1 Solid waste management...... 38 2.6.5.2 Hazardous waste Management...... 39 2.7 Existing Infrastructure Facilities...... 40 3. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT ...... 43 3.1 Preamble ...... 43 3.2 Study Area ...... 44 3.3 Description of the Study Area...... 44 3.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas...... 45 3.5 Ecological Sensitive Areas and Other Protected Area...... 46 3.6 Physical Conditions ...... 48 3.6.1 PIA District Profile ...... 48 3.6.2 Climatic Conditions ...... 48 3.6.3 Rainfall...... 49 3.6.4 Natural Resources of Bengaluru Urban PIA District...... 49 3.6.4.1 Flora & Fauna ...... 49 3.6.4.2 Forest Resources ...... 49 3.6.4.3 Irrigation ...... 49 3.6.4.4 Agricultural Resources...... 50 3.6.4.5 Mineral Resources...... 51 3.6.5 Land Use & Land Cover ...... 53 3.6.5.1 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area...... 55 3.6.6 Topography...... 57 3.6.7 Geology of the PIA District ...... 61 3.6.8 Geomorphology of PIA District...... 63 3.6.9 Hydrogeology of PIA District...... 63 3.6.10 Drainage Pattern in PIA District ...... 64 3.6.11 Soils in PIA District ...... 67 3.6.12 Physiography of PIA District...... 69 3.6.13 Cyclones & Depressions, Winds and Coastal Erosion in PIA District ...... 71 3.6.14 Seismicity...... 73 3.7 Air Environment ...... 73 3.7.1 Meteorological Conditions...... 74 3.7.2 Meteorological Data Collection...... 74 3.7.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data ...... 74 3.7.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period ...... 75 3.7.4.1 Atmospheric Inversion...... 77 3.7.4.2 Meteorological data during Study Period ...... 78 3.7.5 Ambient Air Quality ...... 78 3.7.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations ...... 78 3.7.5.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency ...... 79 3.7.5.3 Results and Discussions...... 80 3.7.5.4 Observations ...... 90 3.8 Noise Environment ...... 90 3.8.1 Results and Discussions...... 90 3.8.2 Observations ...... 91 3.9 Water Environment...... 91 3.9.1 Surface Water Resources ...... 91 3.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment...... 104 3.9.1.2 Results and Discussions...... 108 3.9.2 Ground water resources ...... 108 3.9.2.1 Ground water Quality...... 109 3.9.2.2 Results and Discussions...... 114 3.10 Soil as a resource and its Quality...... 114 3.10.1 Soil quality...... 114 3.10.2 Results and Discussions...... 118 3.11 Flora & Fauna ...... 119 3.11.1 Flora ...... 119 3.11.1.1 Aquatic Vegetation ...... 120 3.11.1.2 Planktons...... 120 3.11.2 Fauna...... 121 3.11.2.1 Birds...... 123 3.12 Socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area...... 125 3.12.1 Socio economic Profile of the district...... 125 3.12.2 Socio economic Profile of the study area...... 126 3.12.2.1 Employment and Livelihood...... 135 3.12.2.2 Industries within the study area ...... 141 3.12.2.3 Health Facilities within the study area...... 141 3.12.2.4 Sanitation Facilities & Drinking water facilities within the Study Area...... 143 3.12.2.5 Education facilities...... 149 3.12.2.6 Other infrastructure facilities ...... 151 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES...... 159 4.1 General...... 159 4.2 Construction Phase...... 159 4.3 Operation Phase ...... 159 4.3.1 Air Environment ...... 160 4.3.1.1 Study Area ...... 160 4.3.1.2 Objective...... 161 4.3.1.3 Meteorological Data...... 161 4.3.1.4 AERMOD Process ...... 162 4.3.1.5 The status of air pollution due to the existing DG sets Boilers and scrubbers...... 163 4.3.1.6 CONCLUSION...... 168 4.3.1.7 Pollution Control Measures ...... 169 Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control ...... 169 4.3.2 Water Requirement ...... 170 4.3.2.1 Impact due to Waste Water Generation ...... 170 4.3.2.2 Mitigation Measures ...... 170 4.3.2.3 Wastewater Quality and Quantity...... 171 4.3.3 Noise Environment ...... 172 4.3.3.1 Impacts...... 172 4.3.3.2 Mitigation Measures ...... 172 4.3.4 Solid waste management...... 173 4.3.4.1 Impacts...... 173 4.3.4.2 Mitigation Measures ...... 173 4.3.5 Land Environment...... 174 4.3.6 Ecology ...... 174 4.3.7 Socio-Economic Environment ...... 175 5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES...... 177 5.1 History and Background of the Site...... 177 5.2 Current Proposal ...... 177 5.3 Results of the Analysis...... 177 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (EMP)...... 180 6.1 Introduction...... 180 6.2 Objectives ...... 181 6.3 Project Environmental Monitoring ...... 183 6.4 Monitoring by CIPLA...... 184 6.5 Compliance Reports...... 184 6.6 Plantation Monitoring Programm ...... 184 6.7 On-site Mock Drills Requirements ...... 185 7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES ...... 188 7.1 Public Hearing ...... 188 7.2 Disaster Management Plan...... 188 7.3 R& R ...... 188 7.4 Risk Assessment ...... 188 8 PROJECT BENEFITS...... 190 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN...... 192 9.1 Introduction...... 192 9.2 Objectives of EMP...... 192 9.3 EMP Roles and Responsibilities...... 193 9.3.1 Environmental Management Cell ...... 193 9.3.2 Compliance against the Consent Condition ...... 195 9.3.3 Compliance to the Recommendations Mentioned In the CREP Guidelines...... 196 9.3.4 Roles and Responsibilities for Environmental Management ...... 196 9.4 EMP for Construction Phase...... 197 9.5 EMP for Operational Phase...... 197 9.5.1 Air Quality ...... 198 9.5.2 Noise Environment ...... 200 9.5.3 Water and Wastewater Management ...... 200 9.5.3.1 Rain Water Harvesting System...... 201 9.5.4 Solid and Hazardous waste Management ...... 203 9.5.4.1 Solid waste management...... 203 9.1.1.1 Hazardous waste Management...... 203 9.5.5 Land Environment...... 204 9.5.6 Ecology ...... 204 9.5.7 Green Belt Development Plan...... 205 9.5.8 Socio – Economic Environment...... 206 9.6 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND SAFETY SYSTEM...... 206 9.6.1 Hazard Identified In the Factory ...... 206 9.6.2 Scenario Based Emergency Actions ...... 206 9.6.3 Available Safety Systems...... 210 9.6.4 Occupational Health and Safety Program...... 216 Occupational Health Monitoring...... 216 9.7 Corporate Social Responsibility...... 219 10 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION ...... 229 10.1 Summary...... 229 10.2 Conclusion ...... 230 11 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT ...... 232 11.1 Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS) ...... 232 LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1 Salient Features of the project site and its environs...... 5 Table 2-1 Site coordinates...... 15 Table 2-2 Nearest Habitat Profile from the project site ...... 15 Table 2-3 Nearest Water Bodies ...... 15 Table 2-4Table 2-4 Details of Existing and proposed products and capacities...... 22 Table 2-5 List of Raw Materials & Quantity for Proposed New Products...... 27 Table 2-6 Existing Solvents & Fuels Materials Tank Storage Details...... 33 Table 2-7 Land use break up details...... 34 Table 2-8 Water Consumption for the Project ...... 34 Table 2-9 Power and Energy Requirement...... 35 Table 2-10 Air Pollution Sources and Control Measures...... 35 Table 2-11 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment ...... 36 Table 2-12 Municipal Solid Waste...... 39 Table 2-13 Hazardous waste ...... 39 Table 3-1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary ...... 45 Table 3-2 District land use/land cover statistics ...... 53 Table 3-3: Land Use/Land Cover statistics of 10 Km radius of the Study Area ...... 55 Table 3-4: Climatological Summary – Bangalore Region (1971-2000) ...... 74 Table 3-5 : Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September – November 2016) ...... 78 Table 3-6: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations...... 79 Table 3-7: Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters...... 79 Table 3-8: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants ...... 81 Table 3-9: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants ...... 82 Table 3-10: Ambient PM10 Monitoring Data...... 83 Table 3-11: Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring Data...... 84 Table 3-12 : Ambient SO2 Monitoring Data ...... 85 Table 3-13: Ambient NO2 Monitoring Data...... 86 Table 3-14: Ambient Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring Data...... 87 Table 3-15: Ambient Ozone (O3) Monitoring Data ...... 88 Table 3-16: Ambient Ammonia (NH3) Monitoring Data...... 89 Table 3-17: Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Monitoring Data ...... 90 Table 3-18: Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels ...... 91 Table 3-19: List of Major Water Bodies within 10Km radius...... 92 Table 3-20: Water bodies in 10km radius of Project area...... 94 Table 3-21: Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters ...... 104 Table 3-22: Details of Surface water sampling locations...... 104 Table 3-23: Surface water Monitoring Results ...... 105 Table 3-24: Groundwater Potential in Bengaluru Urban PIA District ...... 108 Table 3-25: Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations...... 110 Table 3-26: Ground Water Monitoring Results...... 111 Table 3-27: Soil Quality Monitoring Locations ...... 114 Table 3-28: Soil Quality Monitoring Results...... 117 Table 3-29: List of Flora Reported/Observed in the Study Area...... 119 Table 3-30: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park...... 120 Table 3-31: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in the Study Area...... 121 Table 3-32: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park...... 121 Table 3-33: List of Birds Reported/Observed ...... 123 Table 3-34: Bengaluru Urban District Social Indicators ...... 126 Table 3-35: Socioeconomic details of the study area...... 127 Table 3-36: Child population within the study area...... 130 Table 3-37: Social group details within the study area...... 133 Table 3-38: Workers group distribution in the study area ...... 137 Table 3-39: Industrial estates within the study area ...... 141 Table 3-40: List of major Industries within the study area ...... 141 Table 3-41: Health facilities available in Anekal Taluk ...... 141 Table 3-42: Health profile of Anekal Taluk ...... 142 Table 3-43: Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area ...... 144 Table 3-44: Literacy details within the study area...... 149 Table 3-45: Schools in Anekal Block including both public and private management ...... 151 Table 3-46 : Details of roads in Anekal taluk ...... 152 Table 3-47: Summary of socioeconomic Indicators within the Study area...... 152 Table 4-1 Existing Stack emission details of CIPLA...... 164 Table 4-2 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER...... 167 Table 4-3 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE ...... 167 Table 4-4 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN...... 168 Table 4-5 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER...... 168 Table 4-6 Total Maximum GLCs from the proposed Stack Emissions for NOV 2016...... 169 Table 4-7 Air Pollution Control Measures...... 169 Table 4-8 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment...... 171 Table 9-1 EMC Responsibility...... 194 Table 9-2 Compliance against the Consent Condition...... 195 Table 9-3 Roles and Responsibilities of Industry...... 196 Table 9-4 Air Pollution Control Measures...... 198 Table 9-5 Municipal Solid Waste ...... 203 Table 9-6 Hazardous waste and Management...... 203 Table 9-7 Identification of Hazards In Each Departments/Section With Hazard Area Map and Affecting Population...... 210 Table 9-8 Emergency Shutting Down Procedure...... 213 Table 9-9 CSR activities carried out (2013 to 2016)...... 220 Table 9-10 Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan...... 227 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Location map of the CIPLA...... 4 Figure 2-1 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (10 Km Radius) ...... 17 Figure 2-2 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (5 Km Radius)...... 17 Figure 2-3 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (1 Km Radius)...... 18 Figure 2-4 Google Satellite Image demarcation of Project Site...... 18 Figure 2-5 Site Master Plan – CIPLA Ltd, Bommasandra ...... 19 Figure 2-6 Site Photographs...... 21 Figure 2-7 Process flow for production ...... 26 Figure 2-8 Water Balance Chart ...... 38 Figure 3-1 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius ...... 47 Figure 3-2 Geology & Minerals Map of Karnataka...... 52 Figure 3-3 Land Use Pattern in the PIA District ...... 53 Figure 3-4 Land Use Map of Bangalore Urban district...... 54 Figure 3-5 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area ...... 55 Figure 3-6 Land use/Land cover map of the Study Area ...... 56 Figure 3-7 Physiography map of Karnataka State...... 58 Figure 3-8 Contour/Physiography map of Study Area...... 59 Figure 3-9: Topo map of the study area ...... 60 Figure 3-10 Geology Map of PIA (Karnataka) ...... 62 Figure 3-11 Geomorphology Map of Study area...... 63 Figure 3-12 Hydrogeology Map of PIA district...... 64 Figure 3-13 Drainage Map of the Study area ...... 66 Figure 3-14 Soil Map of Karnataka State ...... 68 Figure 3-15 Physiography Map of the Study Area...... 70 Figure 3-16 Wind Hazard Map of Karnataka ...... 72 Figure 3-17 Seismicity Map of India...... 73 Figure 3-18 Specific Wind rose for the Study Period...... 76 Figure 3-19 Annual Windrose (Jan 2016 - Dec 2016)...... 77 Figure 3-20 Hourly variation of the mixing heights...... 78

Figure 3-21 Trends of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area ...... 83

Figure 3-22: Trends of Measured Ambient PM2.5 Concentrations in the Study Area ...... 84

Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient SO2 Concentrations in the Study Area...... 85

Figure 3-24: Trends of Measured Ambient NO2 Concentrations in the Study Area ...... 86 Figure 3-25: Trends of Measured Ambient CO Concentrations in the Study Area...... 87

Figure 3-26: Trends of Measured Ambient O3 Concentrations in the Study Area ...... 88

Figure 3-27: Trends of Measured Ambient NH3 Concentrations in the Study Area...... 89 Figure 3-28 Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area...... 93 Figure 3-29 Ground water level fluctuation decadal mean (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka...... 109 Figure 3-30 Informal Consultation with Locals ...... 127 Figure 3-31 Map Showing the Study area of the Project in Figure FD 0301 ...... 153 Figure 3-32 Map Showing the Air monitoring locations in FigureFD0302...... 154 Figure 3-33 Map Showing the Noise monitoring locations in FigureFD0303 ...... 155 Figure 3-34 Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locations in FigureFD0304...... 156 Figure 3-35 Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations in Figure FD0305...... 157 Figure 4-1 Study area showing the Stacks and DG set location in CIPLA boundary...... 161 Figure 4-2 Wind Rose diagram and frequency distribution for the month of Nov 2016 ...... 162 Figure 4-3 Ground level concentrations of PM during Nov-2016 ...... 165

Figure 4-4 Ground level concentrations of SO2 during Nov-2016 ...... 165

Figure 4-5 Ground level concentrations of NOx during Nov-2016...... 166 Figure 4-6 Ground level concentrations of CO during Nov-2016 ...... 166 Figure 9-1 Environment Management Cell Organogram...... 194 Figure 9-2 Method to recovery solvent and to control fugitive emissions ...... 200 Figure 9-3 Rain Water Harvesting System...... 202 Figure 9-4 Alert Action Plan during Working/Non Working Hours...... 214 Figure 9-5 Emergency Organization Chart ...... 215 Figure 9-6 Safety, Health and Environment Policy ...... 218 Figure 9-7 Corporate Responsibility Policy...... 226 LIST OF ANNEXURES

Annexure A: Land Possession certificate Annexure B: Earlier Environmental clearance & EC compliance report Annexure C: Existing Consent for Establishment Annexure D: Existing Consent for Operation Annexure E: Forest Letter Annexure F: Existing Site Layout Annexure G: Existing Green Belt Layout Annexure H: Existing and Proposed products mix and capacity Annexure I: List of Raw materials & quantity for proposed new APIs Annexure J: Manufacturing process and Material Balance Annexure K: Water Balance Chart Annexure L: Schematic of ETP cum RO plant and MEE plant Annexure M: Analysis Report (Air, Stack & effluent) of existing unit Annexure N: Existing medical surveillance Performa Annexure O: MEEPL agreement copy for HW disposal Annexure P: Scrubber Details & Drawings Annexure Q: Environmental statment Annexure R: Risk Assessment, On-site & Off-site Emergency plan Annexure S: PCB compliance report Annexure T: Rain water harvesting Layout Annexure U: Pollution load scenario Annexure V: Spent solvent recovery plant in existing premises – photographs Annexure W: Proceedings of SEAC/SEIAA & EAC

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix I: Terms of Reference by MoEF&CC Appendix II: ToR Compliance LIST OF ACCRONYMS

AAQ Ambient Air Quality AAQM Ambient Air Quality Monitoring CPCB Central Pollution Control Board CSR Corporate Social Responsibility EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMC Environmental Management Cell EMP Environmental Management Plan ETP Effluent Treatment Plant FO Furnace Oil GLC Ground Level Concentration ISO International Standard for Organization KIADB Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board KSPCB Karnataka State Pollution Control Board kWh Kilowatt per hour LOS Level of Service MEE Multiple Effect Evaporator MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet NAAQ National Ambient Air Quality PCB Pollution Control Board PCU Passenger Car Unit PO Pure Oil R & D Research & Development RO Reverse Osmosis SEAC State Expert Appraisal Committee SEIAA State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority STP Sewage Treatment Plant TDS Total dissolved Solids TOR Terms of Reference TSDF Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities ZLD Zero Liquid Discharge EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Executive Summary Page i Obtaining Environmental clearance EIA/EMP Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA within its 28.49 Acres of land located at API Division. Plot.No.285, 286 & 287, Bommasandra – Jigani Link road, KIADB IVth Phase Jigani, Bengaluru Urban – 560105, Karnataka.

The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63 nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have 113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs with no increase in the overall production quantity and no increase in effluent load/pollution load. The total site area is 115335.23 sq. m. (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha). The green belt is 38035.8 Sq.m / 9.39 Acres (33 %) of the total area. There is an existing environmental clearance, CFE & CFO.

The project site falls in the Latitude 12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E at a distance of 5.4 km away from the NH-44 (old NH-7) Bengaluru to Hosur Highway.

The proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that MoEF&CC Draft Notification No. S.O. 5639(E) dated: 30th October, 2018 the final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. As per the certificate issued by R.F.O (No. 415/2018-2019 dated 18.01.2019) it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park, therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006.

The Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category A, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as per the EIA Notification 2006 and its subsequent Amendments requiring EIA studies of the project. The facility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities. The application along with relevant project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnataka on 21.07.2016. Based on the information furnished and the presentation made before the State Expert Appraisal Committee Members, the proposal was appraised in the 170th SEAC meeting held on 18.08.2016 and was issued the Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparing Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report vide Letter No. SEIAA/F.No- SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated 24.09.2016.

As per MoEF&CC Notification No. S.O. 804 (E) dated: 14th March, 2017 & Proceedings of the Executive Summary Page ii Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

135th KSEIAA Meeting referring the proposal to MoEF&CC under violation and we have been submitted EC Application in MoEF&CC under violation vide F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III, Proposal No. IA/KA/IND2/69050/2017 dated: 13/09/2017 (F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III).

The MoEF&CC Expert Appraisal Committee appraised our proposal F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III, dated: 13/09/2017 during the 4th EAC Violation Meeting held on 19th – 21st Feb, 2018. The Committee opined that the case is not covered under violation and the State Government/SEIAA can appraise the case as per the ToR granted vide File No. SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated: 24.09.2016.

As per the MoEF proceedings of 4th EAC meeting, we have been submitted the EIA Report and Required Annexure to Karnataka SEIAA. The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in 201st SEAC meeting held on 30.06.2018 and the proceedings of 153rd SEIAA meeting held on 21.07.2018 stated that Authority opined that it is just and necessary to consider the proposal as a case of violation in accordance with the SEAC to appraise the project accordingly for issue of ToRs under violation category.

Subsequently, The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in 217st SEAC meeting held on 02.03.2019 and the proceedings of 166rd SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019. The authority observed that the proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. The authority noted that as per the certificate issued by R.F.O it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park, therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006 whereby it would require environment clearance from MoEF&CC, GOI.

The Authority therefore decided to advice the proponent to approach the MoEF&CC, GOI for the required Environmental Clearance. The authority also decided to close the file and delist from pendency after issuing an endorsement to the proponent in this regard.

Now based on the Proceedings of 166th SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019, we are submitting the EIA & required Annexure under Category A, Schedule 5(f), Synthetic Organic Chemicals vide Issued ToR from Karnataka SEIAA File No. SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated: 24.09.2016.

Page iii Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Chronology Matrix of the Project

Existing products having EC F. No.J-11011/214/2006-IA II(I) Dt: 05.03.2007, also CFE No CFE- EIA/CL/EIA-342/2006-2007/44 Dated 14.07.2006 (43 products from EC, qty 200 MTPA), KSPCB/HPI/EIA/166/CIPLA-BIA/2011-12 Dated 07.03.2012 (63 products, qty 114.22 MTPA), KSPCB/HPI/166/2015-16/H650 Dated 04.09.2015 (77 products, qty 113.46 MTPA) and CFO No 17 CAT/APC/CIPLA/2007-2008/245 dated 06.09.2007 (7 products from EC, qty 0.35 MTPA), KSPCB/166/HPI/2012-13/H529 Dated 04.08.2012 (63 products, qty 114.22 MTPA) & CFO Renewal: AW-303985 dated: 24.10.2017 (33 Products, qty 109.84 MTPA) Valid upto: 30.06.2021 are available is enclosed as Annexure No. B, C & D.

Chronology Matrix of the Project

Products Year EC No CFE No CFO No Remarks Name MTPA 2007 Total 43 200 F. No.J- No CFE-EIA/CL/EIA- No 17 products 11011/214/2006- 342/2006-2007/44 CAT/APC/CIPLA/2007- EC: 200 MTPA IA II(I) Dated 14.07.2006 2008/245 dated Dt: 05.03.2007 (43 products from EC, qty 06.09.2007 CFE: 200 MTPA 200 MTPA) (7 products from EC, qty 0.35 MTPA) 2011- Total 63 114.22 -- KSPCB/HPI/EIA/166/CIPLA- KSPCB/166/HPI/2012- Change in Product 12 products BIA/2011-12 13/H529 mix Dated 07.03.2012 Dated 04.08.2012 1. From 2007 CFE, (63 products, qty 114.22 (63 products, qty 43 products, qty MTPA) 114.22 MTPA) 200 MTPA. 2. 20 products newly added, qty 35.52 MTA were added after getting no pollution load increase certificate

3. Total 63 products, qty 114.22 MTPA.

Page iv Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

2015 Total 77 113.46 -- KSPCB/HPI/166/2015- Applied CFO based Addition 14 products 16/H650 on CFE dated: products are not Dated 04.09.2015 04.09.2015 taken for (77 products, qty 113.46 CFO was not issued, production MTPA) & directed to EC 2016 Proposed 114.22 EC Applied - - - - Change in Product Change in to File No: SEIAA 33 mix product Mix 113.46 IND 2016 1. From 2011-12 63 to 81 nos CFE, 63 products, products qty 114.22 MTPA. 2. 18 products newly added, qty 12.47 MTPA 3. Quantity increased 27 products 37.07 MTPA & quantity decreased 26 products 37.83 MTPA 4. Total 81 products, 113.46 MTPA. 2017 Total 33 109.84 - - - - CFO Renewal: AW- Products 303985 dated: 24.10.2017 (33 Products, qty 109.84 MTPA) Valid upto: 30.06.2021 2016- Existing Total 114.22 Current - - - - Change in Product 2019 63 products Application mix Proposed 113.46 File No: SEIAA 33 1. From 2011-12 Change in IND 2016 CFE, 63 products, product Mix qty 114.22 MTPA. 81 products 2. 18 products newly added, qty 12.47 MTPA 3. Total 81 products, 113.46 MTPA.

Page v Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

I. Water Requirement Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.

II. Waste Water Generation Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of 40 KLD capacity. The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and Toilet flushes. Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.

III. Power Requirement Power requirement of the project is 1500 KVA from BESCOM and DG 3 x 1250 KVA will act as backup facilities in case of power failure. Diesel requirements are 20,000 lit/month & Furnace oil 25,000 lit/month is met from the source of HPCL/IOCL. There is no change in the new proposal.

IV. Man Power The total strength of the CIPLA Limited is 300 people. No additional manpower requirement as it is a proposed project for change in product mix. The manpower requirement will be include both technical and non-technical personnel.

V. Solid Waste V.VI. Municipal Waste Management The source of Municipal solid waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. Solid wastes generated will be stored and disposed to Composting & local pig farm. Total Municipal Solid Waste generated during the operation phase is 150 Kg/day.

Hazardous waste Management The various hazardous waste generated from the process are spent solvent, distillation residues, chemical sludge from the effluent treatment plant and discarded bags from the raw materials section. The hazardous waste will be stored separately in hazardous waste storage area and disposed to KSPCB/CPCB authorized TSDF operators within a stipulated period of time. The hazardous wastes will be disposed as per the Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling)

Page vi Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Rules 1989 and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and subsequent amendments.

Hazardous Waste Generation

Waste Existing Proposed Category Hazardous Quantity Method of handling waste Generated Existing Proposed Total

Collected in Leak proof containers and No Change disposed only to KSPCB registered 5.1 Used Oil 15 KL/A 15KL/A authorized reprocessors provided the oil meets the standards as per schedule-5 part-A of the rules 5.2 Stored in a secured manner and hand Oil soaked 0.5MT/A over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co cotton waste 0.5MT/A processing in cement kiln

28.1 Stored in a secured manner and hand Process over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co residues & 202 MT/A 202MT/A processing in cement kiln / Disposal to Waste TSDF in case calorific value is < 2500 No Kcal/Kg. changes 20.3 Stored in a secured manner and hand Distillation 10 MT/A 10MT/A over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co Residue processing in cement kiln 28.2 Spent Stored in a secured manner and hand 1200 KL/A solvent 1200KL/A over to KSPCB authorized recycler /

33.1 Stored in a secured manner and hand Discarded 2500 2500 over to KSPCB authorized recycler after containers Nos/A Nos/A wash/decontamination only 35.3 Sludge from 60 60 Stored in a secured manner and hand ETP & MEE MTA MTA over to KSPCB authorized TSDF salts

VI. Land Requirement The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.

Page vii Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Land is owned by M/s CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial area. The present land use is industrial.

Land use break up details

AREA IN % OF Description AREA IN SQMTS ACRES AREA Land Utilized for Buildings & Utilities Purpose 18034.03 4.45 15.6

Land Utilized for other allied purpose like 36963.42 9.13 32 Roads, Machinery Equipments, etc..,

Land Utilized for Green Belt Development 38035.8 9.39 33 Area for future expansion 22301.98 5.51 19.3 Total Area 115335.23 28.49 100.00

Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres.

VII. Analysis of Alternative Sites Considered Since the existing site is only used for the proposed Change in Product Mix, no alternate sites are considered.

VIII. Project cost The current infrastructure is adequate for the proposed change in product mix. There is no additional project cost as it is an existing unit. The gross value of existing infrastructure is Rs. 166 Crore.

IX. Description of the Environment

Meteorological Environment The micro-meteorological conditions during the study period for hourly data of wind speed, wind direction and temperature were recorded at the project site. From the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) at Bengaluru, the annually determined wind direction is also mostly West to East. From the meteorological data recorded at this project site, the predominant wind direction was observed from W to E during the study period (Sep to Nov 2016 (Post monsoon)). The wind speed ranges between 0.83 to 2.66 m/s. The temperature ranges between 22 – 26°C. While the relative humidity ranges from 32 - 80%. The total rainfall recorded during study period is 406 mm.

Page viii Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Ambient Air Quality

The ambient air quality has been monitored at 8 locations for 16 parameters including 12 parameters as per NAAQS, 2009 within the study area. The baseline levels of (PM2.5), (PM10),

Sulfur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO, Pb, O3, NH3, Benzene (C6H6), Benzo (a) pyrene (C20H12), As, Ni in all the monitoring locations were found within the NAAQS limits during the monitoring period (Post monsoon) i.e from Sep to Nov 2016.

Noise Environment

The existing ambient noise levels were monitored using precision noise level meter in and around the project site at 10km radius at 8 locations during the study period (Sep to Nov 2016). During the study period, day time noise levels varied between 67.2 – 84.5 dB(A) and night time noise levels varied from 61.4 – 78.9 dB(A) across the sampling stations. The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels in the proposed project site were found within the standard limits whereas in all residential areas they are slightly exceeds the limits prescribed by CPCB/MoEF&CC.

Water Environment

The study area consists of Bommandahalli in the southern region, Hennagara / Ramakrishnapura Lake in the part of Eastern region. The Hebbagodi and Chandapura Lake in the North Eastern / North northeastern part from the project site. The Ragihalli Lake in the part of Southwest region. As the KIADB Industrial Area estate lies in the North eastern region, the representative surface water sampling locations have been chosen. The prevailing status of water quality at eight sampling locations each for ground and surface water have been assessed during Sep to Nov 2016.

The standard methods prescribed in IS were followed for sample collection, preservation and analysis in the laboratory for various physiochemical parameters.

Surface water quality

The values range from 7.12-7.63 for pH, 213-1335 mg/l for TDS, 90-891 mg/l for Total Hardness, 39.7-327 mg/l for chloride and 23.5-56.0 mg/l for sulphate.

Page ix Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Ground Water Quality

The values range from 7.33-8.21 for pH, 390-1280 mg/l for TDS, 140-662 mg/l for Hardness, 9.28 – 34.3 mg/l for nitrates, 48.6 – 250 mg/l for chloride, 32.2 – 123 mg/l for sulphate & BDL (DL 0.05)-0.67 mg/l for fluoride.

Land Environment

Assessment of soil characteristics is of paramount importance since the vegetation growth, agricultural practices and production is directly related to the soil fertility and quality. It is observed that the pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66, conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 19-719 μS/cm. As the EC value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non- saline in nature. Nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous content ranges from 72-540 kg/ha, 36- 432 kg/ha, and 86-324 kg/ha.

Biological Environment

There is a Bannerghatta National Park at a distance of 5.26 Km towards West. The buffer zone of the project site is predominantly covered by Plantation/orchards. The species observed in the study area are mostly commercial crops and plantation crops and breaks were also observed throughout the semi-evergreen and moist deciduous forest types. There is no extinct flora and fauna species found in the study area.

Socio Economic Environment

Bangalore district is located in the sour eastern corner of Karnataka State. It has a geographical area of 2196 sq.km. The district is land locked and shares its borders with Bengaluru Rural district on the north and the east, Ramanagaram on the west, and with the state of Tamil Nadu in the south. The population of the district is 96,21,551. Of the total population, 50,22,661 are males and 45,98,890 are females as per 2011 Census. The district’s share of total Karnataka’s population is 15.75 percent.

The project is located in the Jigani KIADB, Jigani of Anekal taluk of Bangalore Urban District. The 10 Km radius covers almost a major portion of Anekal taluk and some portion of Bangalore Corporation Limits.

The project area comprises of urban and rural background. The taluk Anekal is predominantly rural as 68% population in rural part of the taluk. Agriculture is one of the main occupation in rural apart from Industries and Service sector. The area has more semi and unskilled labour forces go to the other part of the district.

Page x Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

The child sex ratio of the project area is 968 but for the district it is 944. There is a need for social intervention is required to balance the gender inequality.

The majority of the population in the project area belongs to General Category (80.23%). The scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population are 17.08% (22.93% of the district) and 2.07% (3.26% of the district).

An important dimension to understand the employment scenario is through the main and marginal workers data provided by the Census. Of the total working population, the majority (91.20%) is the main workers i.e they have study job more than six months per annum. It is due to the industrialization in the area. The job vibrancy is due to the secondary and tertiary sectors. Only 10.25% of working population involved in the agriculture and allied occupation (primary).

X. Anticipated Environmental Impacts

Air Environment

Base line data reveals that ambient air quality in the study area for all the parameters are well within the permissible limits as prescribed by National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The main sources of emissions will be from the D.G sets, Reactors and Boiler which are facilitated with stacks of adequate height as an air pollution control measure.

Noise Environment

Baseline line study showed that the noise levels were within the CPCB standards at industrial sites. The designed equipment with noise levels not exceeding beyond the requirements of Occupational Health and Safety Administration Standard will be employed. Though the noise levels in buffer zone residential areas are slightly higher than standard limits.

Land Use

The present land use is Industrial proposed project is change in product mix without increasing pollution load and without increasing the infrastructure facilities within the existing facility. Hence there is no any change in land use.

Environmental Monitoring Program

A monitoring schedule with respect to Ambient Air Quality, Water & Wastewater Quality, Noise Quality as per Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB), shall be maintained.

Page xi Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Pollution Control Measures

The emissions from the reactors will be mitigated by providing adequate stack to the boilers and scrubbers are connected to the reactors. The D.G sets are facilitated with adequate stack height of 30m AGL or above to disperse the pollutants. Acoustic enclosures are provided to the DG sets to control noise emissions.

Municipal Solid Waste is being disposed to Composting & local pig farm. The hazardous waste will be stored separately in hazardous waste storage and disposed to KSPCB/CPCB authorized TSDF sites within a stipulated period of time. Hazardous waste materials will be properly disposed as per the Hazardous and other Wastes (Management and trans boundary Movement) Rules 2016 and subsequent amendments.

Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of 40 KLD capacity. The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and Toilet flushes. Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.

XI. Risk Analysis Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis including identification, screening of scenarios, and consequence analysis of the various risk scenarios. Risk Assessment has done with respect to the Raw materials, Processes, Solvent & neighboring villages;

The Methodology adopted for Risk Assessment by using the software PHAST examines the progress of potential incident from the initial release to far –field dispersion including modelling of pool spreading and evaporation, flammable and toxic effects where individual risks are to be identified and also PHAST software.

The scope of the study mainly involves:  Identifications of Hazards  Consequence modeling  Flammable area of Vapor cloud explosion modeling  Jet Fire analysis  Toxic area of vapour cloud analysis  Blast area of vapour cloud explosion

Page xii Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 Impact limits identifications and contour mapping of the risk on the layouts.  Mitigating measures for handling and storage to reduce impacts & prevent incidents.

Risk Control Measures  Pressure safety valves for storage tanks  Pressure alarm high and pressure alarm low for storage tanks  Level indicators with monitoring from control for storage tanks  Level transmitter, Level gauge and Temperature indicators for the storage tanks  Fire protection arrangements in the form of Fire Hydrants and Monitors for the storage tanks.  Emergency Handling checklist and procedure

XII. Disaster Management Plan The salient features of Disaster Management Plan includes  Emergency shutdown procedure  Electrical Power Failure & Key Utility failures  Fire protection system  Emergency safety equipment & Reporting and response to emergency  Emergency Help from nearby industries and tie up with nearby industries  Emergency Control Room - is the focal point in case of an emergency from where the operations to handle the emergency are directed and coordinated. It will be equipped with Internal and P & T telephones, Paging system and Emergency siren.

On-Site Emergency Plan  To provide effective planning, communication and to ensure discipline while mitigating identified emergencies at the earliest utilizing available resources, safety gadgets and systems.  Synchronized action from all the internal and external agencies at the earliest to initiate corrective and preventive action.  To minimize the human injury and illness during emergency mitigation, priority is given to rescue of incident victim/s, rendering them first aid onsite and if required providing further medical services at the earliest, which is available nearest to our plant (health city).  To minimize damage to property, general environment or work environment.  To effectively refer and utilize this revised onsite emergency plan while conducting on site emergency and preparedness response drills and also during real emergencies.

Page xiii Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 To identify any deviations during above drills and real situations to ensure any identified and recorded observations for continual corrective actions and preventive actions.

Off-Site Emergency Plan The Off-site Emergency Plan, which is the responsibility of the District Emergency Authority, deals with measures to prevent and control emergencies affecting the public and the environment. The management developed contingency plan as per Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and other applicable regulations, in association with District Emergency Authority. A yearly mock drill of district offsite emergency plan is essential and mandated as per National Disaster Management Guideline. SOPs has implemented for rescues teams and regarding the wearing of full protective gear before entering the hazardous zone and cordoning off the disaster site are required. This plan considers the possible effects of incidents from any industry on the neighbouring population and the remedial measures.  Inventory of hazardous chemicals  MSDS of such chemicals  Types of emergencies  Nature, extent and likely effects of such incidents  Risk and Environmental Impact Assessment The District Emergency Authority, based on severity of any emergency in product distribution network will declare off-site emergency.

XIII. Benefits of the Proposed Project The proposed change in product mix in the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit, fulfill market requirement and will play a vital role in the health care sector and thereby addresses the market demand and Social benefits.

The products manufactured at this facility will be exported that will aid in adding to the revenue of the nation. The corporate social responsibilities that will be taken up by the proposed project will improve the well-being of the society and the corporate responsibilities towards the protection of the environment will help in conserving the ecosystem.

Page xiv Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION

Page 1 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

1. Introduction

1.1 Project Background

M/s. CIPLA Limited was established in the year 1973 by late Dr. K. A. Hamied now developing under leadership of Mr. Y. K. Hamied with strong focus in India & Abroad. It is ranked amongst top 20 in India out of 300 Indian pharma companies-ORG-IMS 2012. The CIPLA group has approximately more than 25000 employees comprising management, marketing and technical professionals.

In the early ninetees company decided to enter the export markets and started with export of their products to the neighboring countries. As a part of the business expansion plan set-up several cGMP-compliant manufacturing facilities and are built to satisfy the Norms of USFDA and manufacturing is done as per stringent norms of WHO, EDQM.

M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63 nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have 113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs with no increase in the overall production quantity and no increase in effluent load/pollution load. The total site area is 115335.23 sq. m. (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha). There is an existing environmental clearance and CFE for the products.

1.2 Project Proponent

M/s. CIPLA Limited

Corporate Office: CIPLA Ltd. – 100% EOU, Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District – 560 105, Karnataka. Phone: +91 80 22053912 Fax +91 80 22053912.

Contact Persons: - 1) Mr. Subrat Satpathy – Site Head 2) Mr. Kapini Gowda – EHS 1.3 Proposed Project

The proposed project is change in product mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates manufacturing Unit with an area of 11.52 Ha (28.49 Acres) within the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Bengaluru.

Page 2 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

1.4 Justification & Need for the Project

In order to become an active player in the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) segment catering to both domestic and international markets, CIPLA now proposes to change in product mix of API manufacturing facility near Bommasandra-Bangalore, which will also house a state of the art QC/QA/R&D & EHS to cater the advanced technological and market requirement.

1.5 Location of the project site

The proposed site is located at Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra- Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka. The site is about 11.42 Ha (28.23 Acres) and falls in 57H/9 of SOI Topo Sheet and spatial location of the site is Latitude 12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E (Centre coordinates). Salient features of the project site and its Environs are given in Table 1-1. Location map of CIPLA Limited given in Figure 1-1.

Page 3 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 1-1 Location map of the CIPLA

Page 4 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 1-1 Salient Features of the project site and its environs

S. Particulars Details within 10Km radius from Proposed project No. 1 Location: Plot. No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area Village Bommasandra-Jigani link road Taluk (Mandal) Anekal District Bengaluru Urban State Karnataka 2 Latitude 12047’8.31” N 3 Longitude 77038’54.28” E 4 Elevation above Mean Sea Level (MSL) 890 m 5 Climatic condition as per IMD Annual Daily Mean (MIN) Temperature : 19 0C Annual Daily Mean (MAX) Temperature : 29.4 0C Annual Average Rainfall : 974.5 mm Annual Average Humidity : 80 Day; 51 Night 6 Present land use at the proposed site KIADB Industrial Area 7 Nearest Highway/Road Bengaluru to Hosur NH-44 (old NH-7) at a distance of 5.4 km towards NE 8 Defence installations Nil within 10 km radius 9 Nearest railway station Heelalige 7.2 km towards NE & Anekal 9.4 km towards SE SW 10 Nearest airport/air strip Bengaluru Kempegowda International Airport at a distance of 46 km towards North 11 Nearest village  Bande Nallasandra village at a distance 1.22 km towards North  Jigani at a distance of 0.9 km towards WSW 12 Nearest town Bangalore 25 km towards North 13 Nearest town Bengaluru 25 Kms towards N 14 Nearest river Nil within 10 km radius 15 Archaeologically important places Nil within 10 km radius 16 Nearest place of Tourist/Religious Bannerghatta Nationa Park at a dstance of 5.26 km towards W importance 17 Ecologically sensitive areas (National The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at a distance of 5.26 Parks/Wildlife sanctuaries/bio-sphere Km towards West from the project site (as per Range forest reserves) office, Bannerghatta wild life Range, Kalkere, Bengaluru, Letter No. 415/2018-19 dated: 18.01.2019) 18 Reserved/Protected forests within 10 km Nil radius 19 Type of soil Reddish brown clay slit soil

The proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that MoEF&CC Draft Notification No. S.O.

Page 5 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

5639(E) dated: 30th October, 2018 the final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. As per the certificate issued by R.F.O (No. 415/2018-2019 dated 18.01.2019) it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park, therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006.

1.5.1 Sites considered for the project location

As discussed in earlier section. The site for the proposed project is situated at Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka.

No alternate sites are considered as the proposed project is change in product mix without increasing pollution load & without increasing infrastructure facilities within the existing facility. Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial area. The present land use is industrial. The land possession certificate from KIADB is enclosed as Annexure A.

1.6 Need for the EIA Study

According to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification issued by Ministry of Environment, Forests& Climate Change (MoEF&CC) under Environment Protection Act, the Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category B, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as per the EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments requiring EIA studies of the project. The facility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities.

1.6.1 Project Screening and ToR

Page 6 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

The proposed site is within KIADB Industrial Area. As per Amendment in EIA Notification 2006, dated 22nd August 2013; said notification for change in product mix industries requires prior Environmental clearance from Central Government or SEIAA under sub-section (3) of section 3. The Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category B, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as per the EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments requiring EIA studies of the project. The facility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities. The application along with relevant project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnataka on 21.07.2016. Based on the information furnished and the presentation made before the State Expert Appraisal Committee Members, the proposal was appraised in the 170th SEAC meeting held on 18.08.2016 and was issued the Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparing Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report vide Letter No. SEIAA/F.No- SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated 24.09.2016.

As per MoEF&CC Notification No. S.O. 804 (E) dated: 14th March, 2017 & Proceedings of the 135th KSEIAA Meeting referring the proposal to MoEF&CC under violation and we have been submitted EC Application in MoEF&CC under violation vide F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III, Proposal No. IA/KA/IND2/69050/2017 dated: 13/09/2017 (F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III).

Page 7 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report kms from the boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. The authority noted that as per the certificate issued by R.F.O it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park, therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006 whereby it would require environment clearance from MoEF&CC, GOI.

1.6.2 EIA Study

The EIA study was undertaken covering all the aspects of the specific conditions mentioned in the terms of reference issued by SEIAA. This EIA study was undertaken by M/s Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd (HECS), a NABET accredited EIA consulting organisation, with specific project related inputs required for undertaking the EIA studies from M/s. CIPLA Limited, Bangalore.

M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd is authorized to undertake EIA studies for Synthetic Organic Chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates, bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations, synthetic rubbers basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates) as per the NABET accreditation scheme.

As per EIA notification, public consultation for the proposed project shall be exempted as the project is coming up in notified Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board.

1.6.3 EIA Cost EIA study was undertaken by HECS for an amount of Rs10,00,000/-(Ten lakh Only).

Page 8 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

1.7 Overview of the Methodology of the EIA Study

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report has been prepared based on the methods and guidelines suggested by MoEF&CC/SEIAA to address all the specific conditions stipulated in the Terms of Reference issued by SEIAA, Karnataka.

The EIA study team, headed by an accredited EIA Coordinator, along with the approved Functional Area Experts, undertook detailed baseline studies as per ToR, between September 2016 to November 2016.

Micro-meteorological data comprising hourly readings of wind speed, wind direction, dry bulb temperature, relative humidity and rainfall were measured by installing an onsite meteorological station near the Project site. Hourly readings were collected for a period of three (03) months. Micro-meteorological data was adopted for generating wind rose diagrams and also to predict the ground level concentrations due to release of emissions from the proposed project.

Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) was measured at 8 locations in the study area as per the methods and procedures recommended by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Air quality sampling was undertaken for a period of 12 weeks with a total of 24 samples per site were taken as per the MoEF&CC guidelines. Stipulated criteria pollutants such as particulate matter size less than

10 microns (PM10), Particulate matter size less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Carbon monoxide (CO), Hydrocarbons (HC) and Ozone (O3) were analysed at all the locations. The measured background air quality data was compared with that of the prevailing National Ambient Air Quality Standards and this will also form the basis for predicting the cumulative air quality scenario due to the operation of the proposed facility.

Hydro-geological status was studied based on the secondary published long-term data. Data on sub-surface soil profile and also bore-log data in the study area was obtained. In additional, a preliminary study on the regional and local acquifer status was studied based on primary and secondary data.

Ground water samples from 9 locations were analysed as per the terms of reference for all the designated parameters. The measured values were compared with drinking water standards. Secondary data on the regional ground water status was also collected from the Central Ground Water Board and the State Ground Water Board.

Page 9 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

There are no major perennial rivers flowing within the study area. However surface water samples from nine (09) locations were analysed as per the terms of reference for all the designated parameters. All seasonal streams, rivers and water bodies located within the study area were mapped through latest remote sensing data under land use and land cover study. Walkthrough surveys were also undertaken to assess the current status of the water resources. Details about the major cropping pattern and irrigation methods etc were collected from local village offices and also published district census data. Details of the surface water quality in the study area were also collected and analysed for designated physicochemical, elemental and biological parameters.

Land use and land cover was mapped using remote satellite imagery. The data was processed using applicable software models and level 2 land use classification within the study area was developed. Total station survey was carried out within the site to assess the terrain conditions and also possible flooding scenarios, although there are no perennial rivers in the study area. A walkthough survey was also undertaken near the forest boundaries, major settlements and plantation area to verify the land use as a part of the ground truth survey procedures.

Soil samples were also collected at 9 locations and all relevant parameters such as texture, nutrients, heavy metals and other parameters were analysed in the soil samples. Flora and Fauna survey was undertaken in the study area and all spotted ecological and biological aspects were mapped based on grid sampling method. Bio-diversity density and abundance were estimated. Walkthrough surveys near forest area and its environs were also undertaken to assess the ecology around the forest areas and dependency of the local people on the forest produce.

Primary socio economic survey was undertaken in the study area to capture the socioeconomic conditions, major occupation of the people, drinking water and sanitation facilities, transportation and other amenities in the study area, with a specific reference to the villages located within five (5) km radius (Category-I) of the project site and villages located within 5 to 10Km radius (Category-II) of the project site.

In addition to the above, district level census data published by National Informatics Centre (NIC) was also collected for a detailed analysis on the socioeconomic aspects. Based on the socioeconomic survey, a need based Community Development Plan under Coroporate Social Responsibility (CSR) was suggested. Since, there are no settlements at the proposed Project

Page 10 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report site, detailed Rehabilitation and Resttlement studies are not envisaged under this study; however, the indirect impacts on the local and regional community due to land acquisition were studied.

A typical review on the various industrial units, various pollution control systems proposed details of wastes and discharges that are envisaged from the proposed project were also undertaken. Such inputs are adopted while predicting various environmental impacts due to operation of the facility and also to suggest an appropriate environmental management plan and environmental monitoring plan.

As a part of the environmental impact assessment study, an attempt was made to predict the possible and likely impacts on background environment. Likely air quality impacts due to release of emissions within the CIPLA (stacks) were modelled using AERMOD model.

Ground level concentration of criteria pollutants such as Particulate Matter, Sulphur Dioxide, and Oxides of Nitrogen were estimated using MoEF&CC approved AERMOD model. Hourly meteorological data collected from IMD data Bengaluru, at the Project site using Lakes environment, Canada was adapted to assess ground level concentrations. Maximum ground level concentrations were predicted and concentration isopleths of the above mentioned pollutants were plotted. The predicted ground level concentrations of the respective pollutants were added to the prevailing baseline concentrations of the designated pollutants to assess the likely cumulative post project scenario and such values were compared with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Noise generating sources and the expected noise levels were estimated. Impact due to utilisation of treated wastewater for greenbelt/Utilities applications were studied. Since the proposed project will not discharge any treated wastewater into surface water bodies (ponds, rivers and Canals), no further environmental modelling studies related to river water quality modelling etc were considered under this study.

In addition to the above aspects, the positive environmental benefits arising from community development plans under CSR programme, ecological and biodiversity enhancement aspects due to development of plantation and green-cover development in the project site were also studied.

Page 11 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Based on a detailed environmental impact assessment study, a comprehensive report on the environmental management plan was developed covering the following aspects: air quality management plan, noise and water quality management plan, wastewater treatment, reuse, recycling and disposal programme, rainwater harvesting plan, socioeconomic and community development plan, ecological and biodiversity enhancement plan. An outline of the proposed environmental management systems, environmental cell and environmental monitoring programme were also presented in this report.

Although the proposed project utilises the limited quantities of flammable and combustible materials with threshold levels below the stipulated quantities under Hazardous Materials Handling Rules, a preliminary risk assessment study and Disaster Management study, was undertaken to assess the residual risks, if any, due to storage and handling of diesel, furnace oil, and other combustible material. Wherever applicable, quantitative methods were adopted to establish the heat radiation levels due to accidental fires at storage facilities.

CPCB guidelines on risk assessment methods were adopted and CPR 18E guidelines were used for estimating the consequences of fire accidents. Based on the risk assessment study, a preliminary fire safety and occupational health management plan was suggested. A road map for onsite emergency and disaster management plan was suggested based on the preliminary information available at this stage.

1.8 Structure of the EIA Study

This EIA report is structured into nine chapters as below. Chapter 1 – Introduction presents details of project background, justification and need for the project, screening and scoping studies etc.,

Chapter 2 – (Project Description) presents details of the proposed project, land requirement and details of various supporting facilities required for the project.

Chapter 3 - (Description of Environment) presents a comprehensive description of the baseline environmental conditions of the study area. This includes the data obtained from primary surveys and also secondary published data from various authentic sources.

Page 12 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Chapter 4 – (Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures) presents the environmental aspects associated with the proposed project, envisaged emissions and discharges from the facility, an overview of various pollution control systems proposed under project planning activities in the detailed project report and construction and operational phase environmental impacts.

Chapter 5 – (Analysis of Alternative Sites & Technology) presents alternative sites if any considered for the project and alternative Technologies considered for this project.

Chapter 6 – (Environmental Monitoring Programme) depicts the summary of proposed environmental management plan.

Chapter 7 – (Additional Studies) presents the findings of the risk assessment study, risk mitigation plan, a preliminary onsite emergency and disaster management plan.

Chapter 8– (Project Benefits) presents the benefits of the project.

Chapter 9 – (Environmental Management Plan) depicts the summary of proposed environmental management plan. Chapter 10 – Presents the (Summary and Conclusion) of EIA report.

Chapter 11 – Disclosure of Consultant Engaged presents the declaration by the EIA consultant organisation as per the NABET requirements.

Page 13 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Page 14 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Type of Project

M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63 nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have 113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs in (28.49 Acres/11.52 Ha) within KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. The proposed project falls under the schedule 5 (f) Synthetic Organic Chemicals as per the EIA Notification dated September 14, 2006 and its amendments. There is no interlinked project. The project is categorized into category ‘B’ as the site is located inside KIADB Industrial Area.

The project site falls in the Latitude 12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E (Centre coordinates). Site coordinates given in below Error! Reference source not found. and habitat profile in Table 2-2

Table 2-1 Site coordinates

Site Point Latitude & Longitude Direction Corne Near Vehicle 12°47'1.09" N, 77°38'52" E S Corner Near HT Switch yard 12°47'7.0" N, 77°38'49" E SW Corner Near Scrap Yard 12°47'9" N, 77°38'50" E W Project Site NW Corner 12°47'6.27" N, 77°38'49.33" E NW

Table 2-2 Nearest Habitat Profile from the project site

SI.No Villages Distance in km Direction Population 1 Jigani 0.9 WSW 17036 3 Bande Nallasandra 1.2 N 1348 4 Mada Patna 1.3 S 4076 5 Nanjapura 1.4 NNW 405 6 Vaddarapalya 1.6 SSW 1731 7 Koppa 1.9 N 1474 8 Seethanaikana halli 2.4 SSE 337 9 Rajapura 2.7 SE 912 10 Harapanahalli 3.0 W 3040

Table 2-3 Nearest Water Bodies

SI.No Villages Distance in km Direction 1 Hennagara lake 1.0 SE 2 Ramakrishnapura lake 4.9 ESE 3 Hebbagodi lake 5.3 NE

Page 15 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

4 Kammasandra lake 5.9 NE 5 Chandapura lake 6.2 ENE

The notified sensitive area is Banneghatta National Park at a distance of 5.26 km towards West. The satellite image showing the project site and the map indicating the proposed site are Google map covering 10 Km, 5 km, 1 km & 0.5 km radius around the project area is given in Figure 2-1 to Figure 2-4 respectively. Site layout & Site photos are represented in Figure 2-5 & Figure 2-6 respectively and site layout enclosed as Annexure F.

Page 16 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 2-1 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (10 Km Radius)

Figure 2-2 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (5 Km Radius)

Page 17 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 2-3 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (1 Km Radius)

ExistingExisti CIPLAng Limited CIPLA Limit ed

Figure 2-4 Google Satellite Image demarcation of Project Site

Page 18 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 2-5 Site Master Plan – CIPLA Ltd, Bommasandra

Page 19 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CIPLA over all view API II Unit of the Existing Plant

ETP Laboratory RO System

Existing MEE Existing ETP

Page 20 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Existing Green Belt Area Existing Green Belt Area

Figure 2-6 Site Photographs

2.2 Size or Magnitude of operation

M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63 nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have 113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs in (28.23 Acres/11.42 Ha) within KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. The lists of existing and proposed products are given Table 2-4 and Annexure H.

Page 21 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 2-4Table 2-4 Details of Existing and proposed products and capacities

Existing Proposed Qty Category wise Variation in S.No Category S.No Products Quantity (Kgs/A) Qty quantity (Kgs/A) 1 AMLODIPINE BESYLATE 500 1000 500 CARDIOVASCULAR 2 AMLODIPINE MESYLATE 500 1000 500 1 2600 DRUGS 3 CIOLASTRAZOLE 3000 100 -2900 4 FELODIPINE 3000 500 -2500 5 ANAGRELIDE 25 25 0 6 BICALUTAMIDE 2000 2500 500 7 CARBOPLATIN 25 50 25 8 CISPLATIN 25 50 25 9 ETOPOSIDE 250 500 250 10 FLUTAMIDE 5000 2000 -3000 11 MITIXANTRONE HCL 20 10 -10 12 ANASTRAZOLE 0 100 100 13 OXALIPLATIN 0 100 100 ANTICANCER 2 14 CAPACITABINE 0 38000 74430 38000 DRUGS IMATINIB MESYLATE (Alpha and Beta 15 0 10000 10000 Forms) 16 VINORELBINE TARTRATE 0 50 50 17 TEMOZOLOMIDE 0 500 500 18 ERLOTINIB HCL 0 1500 1500 19 GEFTINIB 0 1500 1500 20 SORAFENIB TOSYLATE 0 1500 1500 21 DOCETAXEL TRIHYDRATE 0 100 100 22 IRINOTECAN HCL 0 100 100

Page 22 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

23 PACLITAXEL 0 100 100 24 LAPATINIB DITOSYLATE 0 500 500 25 LENALIDOMIDE 0 1000 1000 26 TOPOTECAN HCL 0 10 10 27 GEMCITABINE HCL 0 800 800 28 PEMETREXED DISODIUM 0 200 200 29 BORTEZOMIB 0 10 10 30 LETROZOLE 0 500 500 31 SUNITINIB MALATE 0 255 255 32 VINCRISTINE SULPHATE 0 50 50 33 VINBLASTINE SULPHATE 0 50 50 34 TEGAFUR 0 1000 1000 35 PAZOPANIB HCL 0 2500 2500 36 ABIRATERONE ACETATE 0 1000 1000 37 CARFILZOMIB 0 20 20 38 RUXOLITINIB PHOSPHATE 0 100 100 39 EVEROLIMUS 0 50 50 40 EXEMESTINE 0 500 500 41 ESTRAMUSTINE 0 500 500 42 NILOTINIB 0 4000 4000 43 DASATINIB 0 500 500 44 REGORAFENIB 0 200 200 45 IBRUTINIB 0 500 500 46 NINTEDANIB ESYLATE 0 500 500 47 POMALIDOMIDE 0 500 500 48 AXITINIB 0 500 500 49 DULOXETINE 3000 500 -2500 3 CNS DRUG 50 OXCARBAZEPINE 7000 50 7130 -6950 51 RILUZOLE 3000 580 -2420 Page 23 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

52 RISPERIDONE 1000 500 -500 53 TOPIRAMATE 10000 2500 -7500 54 LAMOTRIGINE POWDER 1000 2500 1500 55 VENLAFAXINE 5000 500 -4500 56 ESOMEPRAZOLE 2000 2000 0 57 LANSOPRAZOLE 10000 1000 -9000 58 OMEPRAZOLE 10000 2000 -8000 GASTROINTESTINAL 4 59 PANTOPRAZOLE 500 7000 -500 DRUGS 1000 60 RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM 1000 500 -500 61 RABEPRAZOLE POWDER 1000 500 -500 62 ESOMEPRAZOLE POWDER 2000 500 -1500 5 OSTEOPOROSIS 63 RALOXIFENE 5000 1500 1500 -3500 64 LEVOFLOXACIN 15000 3000 -12000 65 OFLOXACIN USP 500 500 0 ANTIBIOTICS / 6 66 CIPROFLOXACIN POWDER 190 4700 0 ANTIBACTERIALS 190 67 GATIFLOXACIN POWDER 5 10 5 68 ENROFLOXACIN POWDER 500 1000 500 OTHERS - 7 ANTOGONADOTROP 69 DANAZOL 500 500 -4500 HIN 5000 ARTHRITIC / 8 RHEUMATIC 70 LEFLUNOMIDE 1000 1000 0 AGENTS 1000 71 RIBAVIRIN 3000 1000 -2000 72 STAVUDINE 1000 100 -900 9 ANTIVIRALS 73 ZIDOVUDINE 5000 1000 3100 -4000 74 VALACICLOVIR HCL 2000 500 -1500 75 DIDANOSINE 2000 500 -1500 10 OPTHALMIC DRUGS 76 REPROTEROLE 3000 1000 1000 -2000 11 ANTI HELMINTICS 77 FEBANTEL POWDER 1000 2000 10000 1000

Page 24 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

78 MEBENDAZOLE POWDER 1500 2000 500 79 ALBENDAZOLE POWDER 2300 4500 2200 80 FENBENDAZOLE POWDER 500 1500 1000 12 R&D products 81 R&D products 0 500 500 500

Total production qty In Kgs 119840 113460 113460 -6380

Total Production Qty In MT/A 119.84 113.46 113.46

Page 25 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

2.3 Project Cost

There is no additional project cost as it is in existing unit. The current infrastructure is adequate for the proposed change in product mix. The gross value of existing infrastructure is Rs. 166 Crore.

2.4 Process Description

The process details of all the products are attached as Annexure J.

Dispensing Raw Material

Raw Materials Charging in Reactor and Reaction monitoring

Centrifuge operation

Material Drying Operation in Dryer Milling Operation Sifting Operat ion Blendin g Operati Finished Goods/ Product on packing

FigureFinished2-7 Process Goods/ Productflow for production Dispatching 2.5 Resource Requirements

2.5.1 Raw Materials

The list of raw materials given in Table 2-5 and MSDS’s are provided as Annexure I and Annexure Q. List of solvents and tank details are given below

Table 2-6

Page 26 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 2-5 List of Raw Materials & Quantity for Proposed New Products

Consumption SI.No Raw Materials Unit Products kg/A quantity

1 Vinblastine Sulphate stage-I 139 Kg/A 2 Methanol 1392.5 lit/A 3 Ethanol 1231.5 lit/A 4 Sulfuric acid conc 1 lit/A 5 N2 Gas 94 Kg/A 6 Acetic acid 458.5 lit/A 7 Tetrahydrofuran 3542.5 Kg/A Vincristine Sulphate - 50 8 Sodium dichromate 111 Kg/A 9 Sodium bisulfite 278 Kg/A 10 Liq Ammonia 1431 lit/A 11 Hyflo Super Cel 555.5 Kg/A 12 Sodium bicarbonate 833.5 Kg/A 13 Sodium sulphae anhyd 278 Kg/A 14 Dichloromethane 12140.5 lit/A 15 Vinblastine tech 285.5 Kg/A 16 Methanol 745 lit/A 17 Sulfuric acid conc 50 lit/A 18 Ethanol 2112.5 lit/A 19 Liq Ammonia 771 lit/A Vinblastine sulphate - 50 20 Dichloromethane/Chloroform 1841.5 lit/A 21 Tartaric acid 154 lit/A 22 Sodium sulfate anhyd 137 Kg/A 23 Nitrogen Gas 162.5 Kg/A 24 5-Fluorouracil 890 Kg/A 25 2,3-Dihydrofuran 1420 Kg/A 26 Dichlorodimethyl silane 1330 lit/A 27 Acetonitrile 3490 lit/A 28 Triethylamine 70 lit/A Tegafur – 1000 29 Diisopropyl ether 3870 lit/A 30 Methanol 9870 lit/A 31 Isopropyl alcohol 13290 lit/A 32 Activated charcoal (acid grade) 20 Kg/A 33 Hyflo 90 Kg/A 2,3-Dimethyl-2H-indazole-6-amine hydrochloride 34 (DMIA.HCl) 2725 Kg/A Pazopanib HCL - 2500 35 2,4-Dichloro pyrimidine 5150 Kg/A 36 Sodium bicarbonate 7825 Kg/A

Page 27 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

37 Rectified spirit 43450 lit/A 38 Dimethyl carbonate 5850 Kg/A 39 Potassium carbonate 4500 Kg/A 40 5-Amino-2-methylbenzenesulfonamide 2825 Kg/A 41 IPA HCl 15000 lit/A 42 Liquor Ammonia 10450 lit/A 43 Dimethyl formamide 11250 Kg/A 44 Acetonitrile 11750 lit/A 45 Acetone 21575 lit/A 46 Methanol 10850 lit/A 47 DHEA Compound 1790 Kg/A 48 Hydrazine Hydrate 1250 Kg/A 49 1,1,3,3 Tetramethylguanidine 3390 Kg/A 50 Iodine 3040 Kg/A 51 Diethyl-(3- Pyridyl) borane 610 Kg/A

52 Bis (triphenylphosphine) Palladium dichloride 1 Kg/A 53 HBr 1430 Kg/A 54 Triethylamine 260 Kg/A 55 4 dimethylamino pyridine 20 Kg/A

56 Acetic anhydride 410 lit/A 57 Liq ammonia 5540 lit/A Abiraterone Acetate - 1000 58 Sodium hydrosuphite 2320 Kg/A 59 Aq. HBr 890 Kg/A 60 Liq ammonia 1880 lit/A 61 Methanol 16930 lit/A 62 Acetone 14490 lit/A 63 MDC 54090 lit/A 64 Acetonitrile 8400 lit/A 65 IPA 14530 Kg/A 66 DMF 3710 Kg/A 67 THF 7940 Kg/A 68 Ac carbon 140 Kg/A 69 Alumina 90 Kg/A 70 Int 1 0.016 Kg/A 71 Epoxyleucine TFA 0.008 Kg/A 72 N,N DIPEA 0.02 Kg/A 73 EDCI HCL 0.004 lit/A Carfilzomib – 20 74 HOBT 0.006 Kg/A 75 Acetonitrile 0.15 lit/A

76 Sat NaHCO3 sol 0.086 lit/A 77 Sat Brine Solution 0.174 lit/A 78 4-chloropyrroo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 224 Kg/A Ruxolitinib Phosphate –

Page 28 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

79 4-(pinacolato borane)-1H-Pyrazole 312 Kg/A 100 80 3-Cyclopentylacrylonitrile 118 Kg/A 81 Tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) 72 Kg/A 82 Trimethylsilylethoxymethyl chloride 279 Kg/A 83 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene 12 Kg/A 84 Phosphoric acid 35 lit/A 85 sodium hydride 90 Kg/A 86 Lithium Tetrafluoroborate 339 Kg/A 87 Ammonium Hydroxide 39 Kg/A 88 Sodium bicarbonate 9 Kg/A 89 Potassium Carbonate 513 Kg/A 90 1,2-dimethoxyethane 444 Kg/A 91 ethyl acetate 20318 lit/A 92 sodium chloride 615 Kg/A 93 Dioxane 3433 Kg/A 94 Toluene 1717 lit/A 95 MTBE 1717 lit/A 96 Acetonitrile 3991 lit/A 97 Dichloromethane 1986 lit/A 98 Heptane 3674 lit/A 99 Methanol 2146 lit/A 100 Isopropanol 429 lit/A 101 Hexane 1717 lit/A 102 Sirolimus 100 Kg/A 103 Ethylene glycol anhydrous 218 Kg/A 104 tert-Butyldimethylsilyl chloride 635 Kg/A 105 Triethyl amine 531.5 Kg/A 106 DMAP 4 Kg/A 107 Sodium sulphate 50 Kg/A 108 Sodium chloride 50 Kg/A 109 Trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride 1385 Kg/A Everolimus – 50 110 2, 6 Lutidine 768 Kg/A 111 1 N Hydrochoric Acid 550 lit/A 112 MDC 16600 lit/A 113 Ethyl Acetate 49300.5 lit/A 114 Hexane 69000 lit/A 115 n Heptane 34200 lit/A 116 Methanol 2175 lit/A 117 Exemestane Stage-I 2740 Kg/A 118 2,3 Dichloro-5,6-Dicyano-P-Benzoquinone (DDQ) 3745 Kg/A Exemestine – 500

119 Sodium Hydroxide Flakes 2190 Kg/A

Page 29 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

120 Sodium Sulphate Anhydrous 1825 Kg/A

121 Benzoic Acid 3835 lit/A 122 Hyflo Supercel 270 Kg/A 123 Toluene 109650 lit/A 124 Acetone 18280 lit/A 125 Acetonitrile 73125 lit/A

126 Estramustine Phosphate 525 Kg/A 127 Sodium Methoxide Powder 105 Kg/A Activated Charcoal AR Grade 128 15 Kg/A Estramustine – 500 Potassium Hydroxide Flakes 129 450 Kg/A Special Denatured Spirit With Toluene 130 15000 lit/A lit/A 131 Methanol 6000 lit/A lit/A 132 NTB Guanidinobenzoate 2840 Kg/A 133 NTB Enamino Ketone 1920 Kg/A 134 Potassium carbonate 4840 Kg/A 135 Sodium Hydroxide 680 Kg/A 136 Toluene 11040 lit/A 137 N,N Dimethyl acetamide 13400 Kg/A 138 NTB amine 2440 Kg/A Nilotinib – 4000 139 Thionyl chloride 1000 Kg/A 140 N methyl pyrrolidone 20560 Kg/A 141 Acetone 69200 lit/A 142 Methanol 27080 lit/A 143 Acetonitrile 17800 lit/A 144 Activated carbon 40 Kg/A 145 Hydrochloric acid 80 lit/A 146 DST-Thiazole carboxamide 555 Kg/A 147 DST-Dichloro compound 435 Kg/A 148 2-(hydroxy ethy )piperizine 1200 Kg/A 149 Sodium tertary butoxide 665 Kg/A 150 THF 4940 Kg/A Dasatinib – 500 151 methanol 21550 lit/A 152 Acetic acid 555 lit/A 153 N-butanol 10000 lit/A 154 Acetone 665 lit/A 155 RGB CMP 222 Kg/A 156 RGB AFP 172 Kg/A Regorafenib – 200 157 Potassium tert butoxide 214 Kg/A 158 DMF 1626 Kg/A

Page 30 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

159 Ethyl acetate 13510 lit/A 160 RGB Phenyl carbamate 310 Kg/A 161 RGB CTA 222 Kg/A 162 Phenyl chloroformate 186 Kg/A 163 Pyridine 100 Kg/A 164 Hexane 722 lit/A 165 Acetone 2400 lit/A 166 PTSA.H2O 88 Kg/A 167 Methanol 7200 lit/A 168 Charcoal 40 Kg/A 3-Iodo-lH-pyrazolo[3,4-^pyrimidin-4-amine (31). lH-Pyrazolo[3,4- d]pyrimidin-4-amine, 30 169 500 Kg/A 170 N-iodosuccinimide ( IS) 1070 Kg/A 171 Compound 31 400 Kg/A 172 boronic acid 32 656 lit/A 173 potassium phosphate tribasic monohydrate 1056 Kg/A 174 Dioxane 5800 Kg/A 175 tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium 270 Kg/A 176 Compound 30 180 Kg/A 177 protected piperidine 143 Kg/A 178 Triphenylphosphine 233 Kg/A 179 diisopropyl azodicarboxylate 180 Kg/A 180 DMF 9440 Kg/A 181 Nitrogen 110 Kg/A Methanol 182 11800 lit/A Ibrutinib – 500 183 ethyl acetate 8960 Kg/A 184 THF 17780 Kg/A 185 Compound 35 70 Kg/A 186 solution of hydrogen chloride in dioxane 590 lit/A 187 diethyl ether 1420 lit/A 188 acrylic acid-d4 12 lit/A 189 oxalyl chloride 23600 Kg/A 190 Triethylamine 3000 Kg/A 191 MDC 7900 lit/A 192 5% citric acid 8300 lit/A 193 Benzene 438 Kg/A 194 DMF 280 Kg/A 195 suspension of 36 45 Kg/A 196 Acryloyl-d3 chloride 11990 Kg/A 197 Compound 122 17 Kg/A 198 Nintedanib Base 450 Kg/A Nintedanib Esylate - 500

Page 31 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

199 Ethane Sulfonic Acid 95 lit/A 200 Acetonitrile 1572 lit/A 201 6-nitro-indazole 81.55 Kg/A 202 3, 4- dihydro -2H- pyran 84.1 Kg/A 203 2,3- dichloro-5,6-dicyano-p-benzoquinone 11 Kg/A 204 Dichloromethane 2915 lit/A 205 DMF 1298 Kg/A 206 tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 112.5 Kg/A 207 potassium carbonate 125.5 Kg/A 208 Iodine 207.5 Kg/A 209 sodium thiosulfate 111.5 Kg/A 210 potassium carbonate aqueous solution 0.75 lit/A 211 DMF 944 Kg/A 212 addition of the intermediate (1) 156 Kg/A 213 2- vinylpyridine 63.75 Kg/A 214 N, N- diisopropylethylamine 102.65 Kg/A 215 tri-o-tolylphosphine 11.15 Kg/A 216 palladium chloride 2.45 Kg/A 217 isopropanol 864.6 lit/A 218 ethanol 410 lit/A 219 ammonium chloride 150 Kg/A Axitinib – 500 (E) -6- nitro-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl] -1- 220 (tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 112.5 Kg/A 221 iron powder 81.3 Kg/A 222 THF 896 Kg/A 223 sodium nitrite 35.1 Kg/A (TC, (E) -6- amino-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl ] - 224 1- (tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 100 Kg/A 225 glacial acetic acid 682.5 lit/A 226 concentrated hydrochloric acid 66.08 lit/A 227 MDC 1936.836 lit/A 228 potassium iodide 103.65 Kg/A 229 Iodine 39.6 Kg/A 230 20% sodium thiosulfate solution 1660 lit/A 231 ammonia 200 lit/A (E) -6- iodo-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl] -1- 232 (tetrahydro-pyran-2-yl -2H-) -1H- indazole 87.5 Kg/A [1, I, - bis (diphenylphosphino) ferrocene] 233 dichloropalladium dichloromethane complex 7.45 Kg/A 234 cesium carbonate 99.15 Kg/A 235 2-mercapto -N- methylbenzamide 42.45 Kg/A 236 ethyl acetate 1344 lit/A

Page 32 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

(E) -N- methyl-2 - {[3- (2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl) _1_ (tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H - indazol-6- 237 yl] thio} benzamide 75 lit/A 238 p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate 151.6 lit/A 239 Methanol 316.72 lit/A 240 ethanol 328 lit/A 241 ethyl acetate 201.6 lit/A

Table 2-6 Existing Solvents & Fuels Materials Tank Storage Details

Existing S.No Chemical No. of Dia Height Volume Internal Type of Internal Tanks (m) (m) (KL) Pressure storage Temp Proposed (0c) 1 Methanol 1 2.5 6.5 25 Under Underground Ambient Nitrogen tank kept in Temp 2 IPA 1 2.5 6.5 25 blanketing RCC tank No Change at 50 mili and 3 Hexane 1 2.5 6.5 25 bar submerged 4 Ethyl 1 2.5 6.5 25 in Gravel Acetate 5 Acetone 1 2.5 6.5 25

6 Toluene 1 2.5 6.5 25 7 HSD 1 3 3 40 Atmospheric Above Pressure Ground 8 Furnace oil 1 3 4 20

9 Methylene 1 2 4 15 Under Nitrogen 10 Chloroform 1 2 4 15 blanketing at 50 mili bar

2.5.2 Land Details

The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.

Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial area. The present land use is industrial.

Page 33 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 2-7 Land use break up details

AREA IN % OF Description AREA IN SQMTS ACRES AREA Land Utilized for Buildings & Utilities Purpose 18034.03 4.45 15.6

Land Utilized for other allied purpose like 36963.42 9.13 32 Roads, Machinery Equipments, etc..,

Land Utilized for Green Belt Development 38035.8 9.39 33 Area for future expansion 22301.98 5.51 19.3 Total Area 115335.23 28.49 100.00

Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres.

2.5.3 Water Requirement

Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal. Table 2-8 Water Consumption for the Project

SI.No Description Existing Break up (KLD) Proposed Total water Effluent generated Total Recycled (KLD) requirement water 1 Process 60 58 Permeate 122 KLD 2 Washing 25 25 3 Boiler Feed 60 35 Condensate 38 4 Chiller 50 KLD No Change 5 Domestic 25 22 6 Other utilities 20 20 7 Green belt 60 - Total 300 160 160 Fresh water (300 - 160) = 140 requirement

Total water Requirement: 300 KLD Effluent Generated: 160 KLD Recycled water: 160 KLD Fresh water Requirement (300 – 160 KLD) = 140 KLD

Water balance chart for existing (300 KLD) facility is given in Figure 2-8 and enclosed as Annexure K

Page 34 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

2.5.4 Power Requirement Power requirement of the project is 1500 KVA from BESCOM. DG sets will act as backup facilities in case of power failure, the details of power requirement given in Table 2-9.

Table 2-9 Power and Energy Requirement

Details Capacity (KVA) Source Existing Proposed Power Requirement 1500 BESCOM Power Back Up 1250x3 No Change DG Sets Fuel oil fired Boiler ( 2 25000 HPCL/IOCL TPH x 3) lit/Month (Furnace oil) TFH system 200000 k (1 x 200000 k cal) - cal

2.5.5 Manpower Requirement

The total strength of the CIPLA Limited is 300 people (permanent & contractual), No additional manpower requirement as it is a proposed project for change in product mix. The manpower requirement will be include both technical and non-technical personnel.

2.6 Pollution Control Measures

2.6.1 Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control

The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG sets, boilers and scrubbers. The DG set and boiler sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the emanating flue gases containing suspended particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen without affecting the ground level concentrations. The emissions generated from the reactors are scrubbed out by wet scrubbers. The source of emission, capacity and the various Air Pollution Control (APC) measures taken are listed in the Table 2-10.

Table 2-10 Air Pollution Sources and Control Measures

Page 35 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m 3 AGL & scrubber Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m 4 AGL & scrubber TFH system 1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL 5 200000 k cal Steam Boilers (2 3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL 6 TPH x 3) Solid waste 1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL & 7 incinerator 25 Scrubber kg/Hr Vapour 1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL 8 absorption (1250 x 3) KVA 3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL & 9 DG sets silencers

Note: Due to change in product mix shall not increase any additional air pollution sources and emission rate.

2.6.2 Odour Control To odour has been controlled with proper mitigative measures. The scrubber details are enclosed in Annexure P.

2.6.3 Noise Pollution The major source of noise pollution in the industry is DG sets, boilers and reactors. DG sets are provided with integral acoustic enclosures. Also the ambient noise levels are within the ambient standards by inbuilt design of mechanical equipment and buildings apart from vegetation along the periphery and at various locations within the industry premises. The plant will be specifically designed with due consideration on minimizing noise pollution. Higher noise levels will be felt only near the active working areas and therefore the workers are provided with personal protective equipment as a safety measure.

2.6.4 Waste Water Generation and Disposal Details Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant.

Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of 40 KLD capacity. The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and Toilet flushes.

Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.

Table 2-11 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment

Page 36 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Phase Population Qty of Sewage/Effluent Treatment Method (Nos) water Generated required (KLD) (KLD) Treated in combined ETP and Existing Operation 300 300 160 STP Proposed construction Not applicable No change after proposed change in product After expansion Operation mix Process 300 300 160

The source of waste water, treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of wastewater generated in Table 2-11 & Figure 2-8 respectively and the ETP and STP process flow diagrams along with their specifications are attached as Annexure L.

Page 37 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 2-8 Water Balance Chart

2.6.5 Hazardous and Solid waste Management

2.6.5.1 Solid waste management The Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. The Municipal solid waste (Organic waste from canteen and pantry) generate150 kg/day. The total manpower is 300 nos during Operational phase. The details are given in the following Table 2-12. & Table 2-13.

Page 38 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 2-12 Municipal Solid Waste

Type of waste Existing Proposed

Quantity Kg/day Collection method Disposal method

Organic waste 150 Bins Composting & Local No change from canteen and pig farm pantry As per CPCB guidelines: MSW per capita/day =0.45

2.6.5.2 Hazardous waste Management The various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. Agreement between TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also we have a valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes. The type of hazardous waste and the quantity generated are detailed in the Table 2-13.

Table 2-13 Hazardous waste

Waste Existing Proposed Category Hazardous Quantity Method of handling waste Generated Existing Proposed Total

28.1 Stored in a secured manner and hand Process over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co residues & 202 MT/A No 202MT/A processing in cement kiln / Disposal to Waste changes TSDF in case calorific value is < 2500 Kcal/Kg. 20.3 Stored in a secured manner and hand Distillation 10 MT/A 10MT/A over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co Residue processing in cement kiln 28.2 Spent Stored in a secured manner and hand 1200 KL/A solvent 1200KL/A over to KSPCB authorized recycler /

33.1 Stored in a secured manner and hand Discarded 2500 2500 over to KSPCB authorized recycler after containers Nos/A Nos/A wash/decontamination only

Page 39 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

35.3 Sludge from 60 60 Stored in a secured manner and hand ETP & MEE MTA MTA over to KSPCB authorized TSDF salts

2.7 Existing Infrastructure Facilities

a. Land

Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial area. The present land use is industrial.

b. Buildings

Total built up area is divided into various sections like Production Blocks, Engineering, Warehouses, Administration, Canteen, Toilets etc. There is adequate space & provision for operations.

c. Plant and Machinery & Utilities

The Plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out almost all chemical reactions and processes. Details of plant and machinery and utility equipments used for the production are as below;

i. Process Equipments:

 Reactors  ANFD  Centrifuges  VTDs  Jet Mill  Multi Mill  Sifter & Blender

ii. Machinery / Utility Equipments;

 Boilers  Cooling towers  DG sets  Air compressors

Page 40 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 HVAC system (Heat, Ventilation and Air conditioning)  Vacuum pumps  Hot water systems  Chilled water plant  Dust collectors  Scrubbers iii. Safety Equipments:

 Fire Hydrant System  Fire Extinguishers  Fire Alarm System  Eye wash fountain / Safety Showers  Emergency PPE cupboards  Wind Sack  Public Address System

Page 41 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT

Page 42 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT 3.1 Preamble

This chapter depicts the existing environmental conditions in and around the proposed project with an area of 28.49 Acres (11.52 Ha) located at plot # 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra,Link Road.IV Phase Jigani, Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka state. The primary baseline data monitored covered three (3) months i.e., from September to November 2016, and secondary data was collected from Government and Semi-Government organisations. The primary baseline data has been generated by M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd, Chennai, and a MoEF&CC approved Environmental Testing Laboratory for the following Terrestrial environmental components.

Terrestrial Environmental Components

Meteorology

 Temperature  Relative Humidity  Rainfall  Wind Speed & Direction  Solar Radiation Ambient Air Quality

 Particulate matter <10 micron size

(PM10)  Particulate matter <2.5 micron size

(PM2.5)

 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)

 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)  Carbon Monoxide (CO)  Lead (Pb)

 Ozone (O3)

 Benzene (C6H6)

 Benzo (a) pyrene (C20H12)  Arsenic (As)  Nickel (Ni)

Page 43 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 Ammonia (NH3)  Hydrogen Fluoride (HF)  Hydrogen Bromide (HBr)

 Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)  Hydrogen Chloride (Hcl) Ambient Noise Levels

 Day equivalent noise levels  Night equivalent noise levels Inland Water Quality

 Groundwater Quality  Surface Water Quality Soil Quality

Flora & Fauna (Ecology)

3.2 Study Area

A 10Km radial distance with the proposed project site as the epicentre has been identified as the General study area for assessing the baseline environmental status. The core study area is the project area and its immediate surroundings to the tune of 1.0 Km radius from the boundary. The project area is the land where the project is being developed. Further the Project Impact/Influence Area (PIA) is 10Km from the boundary of the core area covering Anekal Taluka and some portion of Bangalore corporation under Bangalore urban district of Karnataka. The map showing the study area/PIA for the EIA study is given as Error! Reference source not found..

3.3 Description of the Study Area

As described in Chapter 1 Introduction the M/s. Cipla Limited is located 22 Km North of Bengaluru district of Karnataka. An overall idea of the study area with reference to the physical conditions are presented for better understanding in the following sections before proceeding into the section on the prevailing environmental conditions of the study area. Location map of the project site is given in Figure 1-1.

Page 44 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas

The environmental sensitive areas covering an aerial distance of 10 km PIA from project boundary is given in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary

S.No Areas Proposed project location boundary 1 Areas protected under international conventions, The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at a national or local legislation for their ecological, distance of 5.26 Km towards West landscape, cultural or other related value Ragihalli Forest –7.3 Km towards West 2 Areas which are important or sensitive for The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at a ecological reasons – Wetlands, Watercourses or distance of 5.26 Km towards West other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, Hennagara Lake-1.0 Km towards South East mountains, forests Kammasandra lake-5.9 Km towards North East Ragihalli Forest – 7.3 Km towards West 3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitive The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at a species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting, distance of 5.26 Km towards West from the project site foraging, resting, over wintering, migration (as per Range forest office, Bannerghatta wild life Range, Kalkere, Bengaluru, Letter No. 415/2018-19 dated: 18.01.2019) 4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters 5 State, National boundaries Karnataka – Tamil Nadu Border – 10.7 Km 6 Routes or facilities used by the public for access Bannerghatta - Anekal Road – 2.0 Km to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas 7 Defence installations Nil 8 Densely populated or built-up area Bommasandra village – 3.82 Km towards East North East Doddathoguru– 6.74 Km towards North East Electronic City-6.1Km towards North 9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses Hospitals (hospitals, schools, places of worship, community Narayana Hrudyala-5.07 Km towards North East facilities) Sparsh Hospital-5.33 Km towards North East Srinidhi Hopital-5.65 Km towards East Educational Institutions BTL High School - 4.63 Km towards North East Treamis World School-3.06 Km towards North Royal Public School-5.83 Km towards North East BTL Institute of Tech and Management-4.91 Km towards North East Condor International school-4.32 Km towards North West Christ Academy ICSE school-5.38 Km towards North West Nidyananda High school and college-2.37 Km towards West Tapovan High School-4.11 Km towards West Virindha Educational Academy-5.89 Km towards West Film Academy-5.90 Km towards West T. Johan College-9.34 Km towards North West Sherwood High School-9.56 Km towards North West Worship Places Jigani Masjid-2.25 Km towards West Sri Channa Keshava Temple-7.64 Km towards South East 10 Areas containing important, high quality or scarce Tourism- Bhannergatta National Park-7.72 Km towards resources, (groundwater resources, surface West

Page 45 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

resources, forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism, minerals) 11 Areas already subjected to pollution or No Notified/Recognized polluted area within 15Km distance. environmental damage (those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded) 12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could The site falls in Seismic Zone – II (Low Risk) as per seismic cause the project to present environmental zoning Map of India problems, (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion or extreme or adverse climatic conditions)

3.5 Ecological Sensitive Areas and Other Protected Area

Ecologically sensitive areas like Biosphere Reserve, National Parks, and Wildlife Sanctuaries protected sites as per Ramsar convention and other protected areas (PA) are not found within 10 Km radius of the project site except Bannerghatta Biological Park (BBP) located at a distance of 5.26 Km radius from proposed project site.

The Bannerghatta Biological Park, popularly known as BBP, has been an integral part of Bannerghatta National Park and emerged out as an independent establishment during the year 2002. It is in order to meet the growing demand for eco-recreation, eco-tourism and conservation, an area of 545.00 Ha of forest from National park was set aside to constitute as Biological Park originally and later extended to 731.88 Ha.

Bannerghatta Biological Park is located about 22 Kms south of Bengaluru city. It is one among the few places in the world where wilderness is preserved so close to a big city. It is having different units such as Zoo, Safari, Butterfly Park and Rescue Center (Conservation of captive animals).

In Core area there are no trees in wild and mostly with scrub land. Protected areas from the project location are shown in Figure 3-1.

Page 46 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-1 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius

Figure 3-2 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius in Topo Map

Page 47 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6 Physical Conditions

In this section, the physical conditions of PIA district Bengaluru Urban are discussed in general and wherever possible references to the conditions prevailing in the study area in particular are also provided. The physical conditions are discussed as under:

 District profile  Drainage, land use, geology, Physiography  Natural resources  Climatic conditions, seismic zone characteristics and natural hazards

3.6.1 PIA District Profile

Bengaluru Urban is a district of the Indian state of Karnataka. It is surrounded by the Bengaluru Rural district on the west, east and north and the Krishnagiri district of Tamil Nadu on the south. Bengaluru Urban district came into being in 1986, with the partition of the erstwhile Bengaluru district into Bengaluru Urban and Bengaluru Rural districts. Bengaluru Urban has four taluks: Bangalore North, Bengaluru East, Bengaluru South and Anekal. The city of Bengaluru is situated in the Bengaluru Urban district. The Bengaluru Urban district has 17 hoblies, 668 villages and 9 municipal corporations. Electronics City the pride of India and hub of Bengaluru’s Information Technology companies is situated in Anekal Taluk.

This is the most advanced district in Karnataka. It had a population of 6,537,124 of which 88.11% is urban as of 2001. As of Census 2011, its population has increased to 9,588,910, with a sex-ratio of 908 females/males, the lowest in the state and its density is 4,378 people per square km.

3.6.2 Climatic Conditions

Due to its elevation, Bangalore enjoys a pleasant and equable climate throughout the year. The highest temperature recorded was 35.9 0C on April and the lowest was 10.9 0C in January. Winter temperatures rarely drop below 140C and summer temperatures seldom exceed 36 0C.The PIA district has moderate climatic conditions and characterised by sub-tropical climate. The summer heat is moderated by fairly frequent thunderstorms and occasional squalls causing power outages and local flooding.

Source: IMD _Bangalore_1971-2000

Page 48 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.3 Rainfall

The rainfall of the district is accounted by the Pre monsoon (PRE), SW monsoon (SWM) and NE monsoon (NEM). Majority of the rainfall is contributed by SW Monsoon. In general, humid to semi arid climatic conditions prevail in the district. The average temperature is around 23.1˚C. The seasonal and annual normal rainfall of the four taluks of the district from the year 2001 to 2010 is considered for studying the rainfall pattern. The annual rainfall of Bangalore North taluk is the highest with 1157mm and lowest for Anekal taluk with 890mm

Source: Government of India Ministry of Water Resources Central Ground Water Board.

3.6.4 Natural Resources of Bengaluru Urban PIA District

3.6.4.1 Flora & Fauna

According to Gazetteer of South India, (1988), large trees are common in Bangalore Urban district being usually found only near villages. Among them Margosa (Meliaazardirachta), various species of Ficus (indica, tsiela and religiosa), Tamarind, Acacias (arabica and speciosa), Mango, Coconut Palms, Palmyra and date (Phoenixsylvestris) etc. are reported. A large part of the district is covered with low scrub jungle, in which red sanders tree (Pterocarpussantalinus), the satin-wood (Chloroxylonswietenia), Casuarina were found. Flora and fauna of PIA are discussed in section 3.11.

3.6.4.2 Forest Resources

There are at least a dozen forests around Bangalore. They are mainly Makalidurga, Devarabetta, Doddaragi Halli Betta & Chickkaragi Halli Betta, Suvarnamukhi, Thottikal Falls, Nandihills, Skandagiri, and Muthyalamadu & Savanadurga.

3.6.4.3 Irrigation

The only river of some importance in the district is the Arkavathi river, which flows in the northwest border of the division. This river is a tributary of the Cauvery and flows from north to south. On the way, it forms several large tanks as at Hessaraghatta. Apart from this main river, there are other small rivers like the Vrishabhavathi.

The Vrishabhavathi runs right from one end of the City to the other. On its way, it is fed by effluents from various factories and sewage from several human settlements. This river is one of

Page 49 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report the ugliest features in the City. It becomes particularly obnoxious near Mysore Road. Another stream Suvarnamukhi that has its origin in the division also joins the Vrishabhavathi.

Irrigation of the cultivated lands in the district is mainly carried on by means of water drawn from tanks and wells. In the months of April, May and June severe scarcity of water may be felt. Bangalore City is provided with drinking water from mainly two sources, namely, Tippagondanahally reservoir constructed across the Arkavati river in magadi taluk of Bangalore Rural division and the Cauvery river. Both these sources become almost dry for about a month in May-June, if the monsoons are delayed. The water table of the city is going down each year and the open wells and bore-wells are getting drier and drier. More and more bore-wells have been sunk over the years much beyond the carrying capacity of the water table in the city so much, that almost alternate houses have bore wells now. Another factor for lowering of the water table is the drying and dying up of the lakes and tanks existing in the city, which have been either filled up to make layouts for constructing houses or for creating bus-stands and playgrounds. Many lakes and tanks of the city are severally polluted because of the fact that sewage waters are let into these water bodies.

3.6.4.4 Agricultural Resources

In PIA Agriculture is the main occupation of the people of the district. Rice is the staple food of the people and paddy is the principal food crop followed by Ragi, Jowar and Maize crops. Tobacco, Cashews, Coconut, arecanut, Cardomom, Chillies, Cotton, Sugarcane are also cultivated.

Major Field Crops cultivated: Paddy, Ragi, Jowar, Maize, Sugarcane, Tobacco, Cotton, Chilli etc

Horticulture crops: Mango, Orange & batavina, Cashew, Banana, Chillies, Bhendi, Brinjal, greens, Marigold,

Plantation and Spice crops: Oil palm, Coconut, Betelvine

Livestock: Non descriptive Cattle (local low yielding), Crossbreed cattle, Non descriptive Buffaloes (local low yielding), Graded Buffaloes, Goat, Sheep, Others (Camel, Pig, Yak etc.) Poultry.

Page 50 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.4.5 Mineral Resources

Bangalore Urban doesn’t contain minerals of sufficient commercial value. Nodular concentrations of lime canker are found as secondary product in many places in the gneissic regions. Graphite is observed to occur as crystalline flakes near Chikkabanavar. Geology & Minerals map of Karnataka is given in Figure 3-3.

Page 51 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-3 Geology & Minerals Map of Karnataka

Page 52 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.5 Land Use & Land Cover

Total geographical area of Bangalore Urban district is 2184.14 Km2. Total are of Agriculture land is 531.98 Km2 (%). Forest area covered is 26.41 Km2 (%). Built up area is 1451.41 Km2 (%). Grass land is 5.87Km2 (%). Water bodies’ area is 36.45 Km2 (%). Waste Lands area is 122.02 Km2 (%). Others area is 10Km2 (%). Details of land use/land cover for the Benagluru district are given in Table 3-2 and

Figure 3-4. Land Use of Bangalore Urban (2005) is given in Figure 3-5.

Table 3-2 District land use/land cover statistics

S.No Division of Land Use/Land Area in Km2 Area in Acres Area in Ha % To Total Cover Area 1 Agriculture 531.98 131455.12 53197.99 24.35 2 Forest Cover 26.41 6526.05 2640.99 1.20 3 Built up 1451.41 358651.22 145140.99 66.45 4 Grass Land 5.87 1450.50 586.99 0.26 5 Water Bodies 36.45 9006.99 3644.99 1.67 6 Waste Lands 122.02 30151.79 12201.99 5.59 7 Others 10.00 2471.05 999.99 0.46 Total 2184.14 539712.74 218413.99 100

Figure 3-4 Land Use Pattern in the PIA District

Page 53 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-5 Land Use Map of Bangalore Urban district

Page 54 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.5.1 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area

Total Project Study Area: 331 Sq.Km. Land Use pattern of the study area is given in Table 3-3. LULC map of the Study area is given in Figure 3-7. Table 3-3: Land Use/Land Cover statistics of 10 Km radius of the Study Area

S.No Land Use Area in Sq.Km Area in Acres Area in Ha Area in Percentage 1 Urban 89.21 22044.27 8921 39.69486 2 Cropland 38.65 9550.62 3865 26.95166 3 Plantation 18.14 4482.49 1814 11.67674 4 Deciduous 14.26 3523.72 1426 5.480363 5 Reservoirs/Lakes/ Ponds 13.57 3353.22 1357 4.308157 6 Scrub land 9.08 2243.71 908 4.099698 7 Fallow land 7.82 1932.36 782 2.743202 8 Scrub Forest 4.24 1047.72 424 2.362538 9 Mining 3.03 748.729 303 1.280967 10 Rural 1.19 294.055 119 0.915408 11 Barren Rocky Area 0.42 103.784 42 0.359517 12 Gullied/ Ravinous land 89.21 22044.27 8921 0.126888 Total 331 71368.95 28882 100

Figure 3-6 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area

Page 55 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-7 Land use/Land cover map of the Study Area

Page 56 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.6 Topography

Topography of Bangalore Urban district is generally flat. Physiographically the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at a general elevation of about 900amsl with its major part sloping toward south and south east forming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains form the major part of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to 950m amsl. Major part of the pediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected rolling topography with erosional land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness. Major part of the pediplains is dissected by streamlets flowing in southern direction.

The project site fall under an elevation of 860 m above the mean sea level. and the study area contours vary from 860 m to 920 m above MSL. From the project site the high elevations were observed towards west and West North the lowest contours wereobserved in North and NE direction. While the remaining areas showed variations withrespect to contours

The topography of the study area mainly cover the district of Anekal taluka and major parts forms the pediplains with an elevation of 900m amsl. Physiography map of Karnataka state is given in Figure 3-8, Contour/Physiography map of the Study area is given in.Figure 3-9, Topo map of the study area is given in. Figure 3-10.

Page 57 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-8 Physiography map of Karnataka State

Page 58 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-9 Contour/Physiography map of Study Area

Page 59 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-10: Topo map of the study area

Page 60 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.7 Geology of the PIA District

The prevailing rock is light to dark grey or whitish biotic granite gneiss, which varies considerably from place to place, varies in texture, structure and appearance, according to the fineness or coarseness of its constituent grins and the relative abundance or scarcity, and mode of deposition of the darker ferro-minerals. These complex Gneissic masses have been styled “Peninsular Gneiss”.

The schists are not conspicuous in this district, but small isolated strings of a dark hornblende grannulite, with its contact modified phase of the secondary pale-green pyroxene rock, occur in some parts. Among the dyke rocks, a group of dykes of charnockite affinities and also some hornblende dykes are found bordering Kanakapura taluk. The study area mainly covers Anekal taluk of Bangalore district, mainly Peninsular Gneiss are exposed in the study area. Geology map of the PIA district is given in Figure 3-11.

Page 61 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Project Site

Figure 3-11 Geology Map of PIA (Karnataka)

Page 62 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.8 Geomorphology of PIA District

Physiographically the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at an general elevation of about 900 amsl with its major part sloping towards south and south east forming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains form the major part of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to 950 m amsl. Major part of the pediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected rolling topography with erosional land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness. Major part of the pediplains is dissected by streamlets flowing in southern direction. Geomorphology Map of study area is given in Figure 3-12 which shows that major part of the study area is covered by Denudational Origin–Pediplain Complex 83.71%, Denundational Origin – Hills10.61%, Water Bodies 4.3% and Mining 1.29 %.

Figure 3-12 Geomorphology Map of Study area

3.6.9 Hydrogeology of PIA District

Page 63 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Groundwater occurrence, movement and recharge to aquifers are controlled by degree of weathering, fracture pattern, geomorphological setup and rainfall. Granites and Gneisses of peninsular gneissic group constitute major aquifers in the urban district. Ground water occurs in phreatic conditions in the weathered zone and under semi confined to confined conditions in fractured and jointed rock formations. Laterites of Tertiary age occur as isolated patches capping crystalline rocks in Bangalore north taluk and ground water occur in phreatic condition. Alluvium of 20m thick, which occur along the river courses, though of limited thickness and aerial extent possess substantial ground water potential. Ground water prospects of the study area are greater than 5 litres per second. Hydrogeology map of PIA district is given in Figure 3-13.

Figure 3-13 Hydrogeology Map of PIA district

3.6.10 Drainage Pattern in PIA District

Page 64 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Major part of the district is drained by Shimsha and Kanva rivers of Cauvery basin i.e Bangalore north and South taluks. (Catchment area of 468 sq.km which includes Nelamangala and Magadi taluks of Bangalore rural also). Anekal taluk is drained by South Pennar river of Ponnaiyar basin, which takes its birth from Nandi hills and flows towards south (Catchment area is 2005 sq.km which covers Devanahalli and Hoskote taluks of Bangalore rural district also). The study area is drained towards hennagara lake.The hennagara lake is located on the South-East-East part of the study area. Drainage map of the study area is given in Figure 3-14.

Page 65 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-14 Drainage Map of the Study area

Page 66 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.11 Soils in PIA District

The soils of the district can be broadly grouped into red loamy soil and lateritic soil.

Red Loamy Soils generally occur on hilly to undulating land slope on granite and gneissic terrain. It is mainly seen in the eastern and southern parts of Bangalore north and south taluks.

Laterite soils occur on undulating terrain forming plain to gently sloping topography of peninsular gneissic region. It is mainly covered in Anekal taluk and western parts of Bangalore North and south taluks.

The study falls in the soil order of Alfisols type. They are in semiarid to moist ares. They formed primarily under forest or mixed vegetative cover and are productive for most crops. Soil Map of Karnataka is given in Figure 3-15.

Page 67 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-15 Soil Map of Karnataka State

Page 68 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.12 Physiography of PIA District

Physiographically, the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at a general elevation of about 950amsl.The major part is sloping towards south and south east forming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains form the majority of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to 950amsl. The pediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected rolling topography with erosion land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness. Physiography Map of Study area is given in Figure 3-16.

Page 69 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-16 Physiography Map of the Study Area

Page 70 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.13 Cyclones & Depressions, Winds and Coastal Erosion in PIA District

Bangalore urban district is facing the brunt of moderate to severe floods. Floods are associated with cloud bursts, cyclones or depressions in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea. The floods are quite common in Bangalore Urban District. As per Karnataka wind hazard map Bangalore Urban district is falling under low damage risk zone. Karnataka wind Hazard Map is given in Figure 3-17.

Page 71 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-17 Wind Hazard Map of Karnataka

Page 72 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.6.14 Seismicity

As per the IS:1893 (Part-1) 2002 of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), the project location/study area falls in Zone II, which is categorised as a Low risk zone. The seismicity map of India is shown in Figure 3-18.

Project Site

Figure 3-18 Seismicity Map of India 3.7 Air Environment

Page 73 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Baseline ambient air quality assessment gives the status in the vicinity of site and is an indispensable part of environmental impact assessment studies. Significant changes, in predominant winds and weather conditions are observed in winter, summer and post-monsoon seasons apart from the local topographic influences. The baseline status of air environment in the study area is assessed through a systematic air quality surveillance programme.

3.7.1 Meteorological Conditions

The regional air quality is influenced by the meteorology of that region. The principal weather parameters that influence the concentration of the air pollutants in the surroundings are wind speed, wind direction and temperature. The meteorological data is useful for proper interpretation of the baseline data. It is used as input for air quality dispersion models for predicting the post project environmental scenario i.e. ground level concentrations due to proposed utilities like boiler & DG sets, etc.

3.7.2 Meteorological Data Collection

Available secondary data pertaining to the meteorological parameters was obtained from the IMD Climatalogical tables. In addition, baseline meteorological data (primary data) was generated during the Post-monsoon Season (Sep to Nov 2016). The methodology adopted for monitoring surface observations is as per the standard norms laid down by Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) i.e. IS:8829 and Indian Meteorological Department (IMD).

3.7.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data

The nearest Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) station located to project site is Bangalore. The Climatological data for Bangalore (12 58’ N and 77o 35’ E), published by the IMD, based on daily observations at 08:30 and 17:30 hour IST for a 30 year period, is presented in the following sections on the meteorological conditions of the region. The monthly variations of the relevant meteorological parameters are reproduced in Table 3-4.

Table 3-4: Climatological Summary – Bangalore Region (1971-2000)

Page 74 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Relative Predominant Rainfall Station Level Temp (oC) Humidity Pressure Mean Wind Directions (mm) Wind (%) hPa (From)* Month Speed Daily Daily No. of Total 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30 (m/s) 08:30 17:30 Max. Min. days Jan 27.4 14.2 1.8 0.0 86 42 17.0 13.3 1.58 E E Feb 30.1 15.9 7.6 0.4 77 34 17.5 12.9 1.75 E E Mar 32.7 18.2 14.0 0.8 68 28 18.7 12.4 1.83 SW E Apr 34.0 20.8 40.0 2.8 73 35 22.8 15.9 1.91 SW E May 33.1 20.9 94.4 6.0 76 47 23.3 19.5 2.72 W W Jun 29.8 19.8 80.5 5.0 83 63 22.8 21.9 4.69 W W Jul 28.6 19.4 102.7 7.4 86 66 22.2 21.7 4.61 W W Aug 28.0 19.2 116.6 9.3 88 68 22.2 21.9 4.08 W W Sep 28.5 19.3 195.6 9.6 86 65 22.3 21.5 2.66 W W Oct 28.0 19.0 152.0 8.7 85 66 22.1 20.6 1.69 W E Nov 26.8 17.1 58.4 4.1 84 62 20.0 18.6 1.41 E E Dec 26.1 15.1 17.3 1.5 87 56 18.1 16.2 1.53 E E Max. 34.0 20.9 195.6 9.6 87 68 22.3 21.9 4.69 Min. 26.1 14.2 1.8 0.4 68 28 17.0 13.3 1.42 Avg. 29.4 18.2 - 55.7 82 53 20.8 18.1 2.56 As per the above Climatological table the observations drawn for the study period are the following.

 Daily maximum temperature during the study period is 28.5oC and the daily minimum temperature is 17.1oC were recorded in the months of September and November respectively  Maximum and minimum relative humidity of 86% and 62% were recorded in the months of September and November respectively  Maximum and minimum rainfall of 195.6 mm and 58.4 mm was recorded in the months of September and November respectively  Total rainfall recorded during the study period is 406 mm  Maximum and minimum Mean wind speed during the study period is 2.66 m/s and 1.41 m/s. Annual Wind predominant pattern is from West to East.

3.7.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period

Meteorological scenario in and around the project site is an essential requirement during study period for proper interpretation of baseline air quality status. Meteorological data was collected during the study period; post monsoon season (September 2016–November 2016).The wind rose of the study period and annual wind rose is given in Figure 3-19.

Page 75 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

0 N Calm conditions ratio: 0.0% 0 N Calm conditions ratio: 3.2% 0.73 50.00% (Speed threshold: 1.0) 0.94 22.58% (Speed threshold: 1.0) 1.46 1.89 2.19 2.83 43.75% 19.76% 2.91 3.78 3.64 4.72 4.37 NW 37.50% NE NW 16.94% NE 5.10 5.83 31.25% 14.11%

25.00% 11.29%

18.75% 8.47%

12.50% 5.65%

6.25% 2.82% W 50.00% 43.75% 37.50% 31.25% 25.00% 18.75% 12.50% 6.25% 6.25% 12.50% 18.75% 25.00% 31.25% 37.50% 43.75% 50.00% W 22.58% 19.76% 16.94% 14.11% 11.29% 8.47% 5.65% 2.82% 2.82% 5.65% 8.47% 11.29% 14.11% 16.94% 19.76% 22.58% E E

6.25% 2.82%

12.50% 5.65%

18.75% 8.47%

25.00% 11.29%

31.25% 14.11%

37.50% SW SE SW 16.94% SE

43.75% 19.76%

50.00% S 22.58% S

September 2016 October 2016

0 N Calm conditions ratio: 3.2% 0.63 25.81% (Speed threshold: 1.0) 1.25 1.88 22.58% 2.50 3.13 3.75 NW 19.35% NE 4.38 5.00 16.13%

12.90%

9.68%

6.45%

3.23% W 25.81% 22.58% 19.35% 16.13% 12.90% 9.68% 6.45% 3.23% 3.23% 6.45% 9.68% 12.90% 16.13% 19.35% 22.58% 25.81% E

3.23%

6.45%

9.68%

12.90%

16.13%

SW 19.35% SE

22.58%

25.81% S

November 2016

Figure 3-19 Specific Wind rose for the Study Period

Page 76 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

0 N Calm conditions ratio: 0.5% 1.22 15.62% (Speed threshold: 1.0) 2.43 3.65 13.66% 4.86 6.08 7.29 NW 11.71% NE 8.51 9.72 9.76%

7.81%

5.86%

3.90%

1.95% W 15.62% 13.66% 11.71% 9.76% 7.81% 5.86% 3.90% 1.95% 1.95% 3.90% 5.86% 7.81% 9.76% 11.71% 13.66% 15.62% E

1.95%

3.90%

5.86%

7.81%

9.76%

SW 11.71% SE

13.66%

15.62% S

Figure 3-20 Annual Windrose (Jan 2016 - Dec 2016) Source: www.wunderground.com

3.7.4.1 Atmospheric Inversion

Atmospheric inversion level at the project site was monitored; the results observed at the site during the study period are as follows

 Average atmospheric temperature : 24.00C  Average Relative humidity : 49%  Average Wind speed : 0.83 m/s

The daily inversion level calculated based on the average temperature and average wind speed at the project site and the maximum inversion height is derived by the graph plotted based on the average temperature and average wind speed. The daily inversion level at the project site varies from 50 to 1750m during 6 AM to 6 PM, the maximum recorded at 5 PM, September 2016. This is shown in Figure 3-21.

Page 77 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-21 Hourly variation of the mixing heights

3.7.4.2 Meteorological data during Study Period

The meteorological data of study period was used for interpretation of baseline status and to simulate the meteorological conditions for prediction of impacts in modeling studies. Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September 2016 – November 2016).

Table 3-5 : Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September – November 2016) S. No Parameter Observation 1. Temperature Min Temperature : 22.00C Max Temperature : 26.00C Avg Temperature : 23.70C 2. Relative Humidity Range 32 to 80% 3. Wind Speed Range 3.5 m/s 4. Predominant Wind Direction Sept 2016-WSW Oct 2016-NE Nov 2016-ENE

3.7.5 Ambient Air Quality

The selection criteria for monitoring locations are based on the following:

 Topography/Terrain  Meteorological conditions  Residential and sensitive areas within the study area  Representatives of regional background air quality/pollution levels and  Representation of likely impacted areas

3.7.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations

Page 78 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

To evaluate the baseline air quality of the study area, Eight (08) monitoring locations have been identified as per IMD Climatological data-Bangalore Region (1971-2000).The annual wind predominat is from West to East,

Map showing the monitoring locations are given as Error! Reference source not found. and the details of the locations are given in Table 3-6.

Table 3-6: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations Distance (km) Station Type of Azimuth Location Geographical Coordinates from Project Code Wind Directions boundary A1 Project Site - 12°47'7.77"N 77°38'56.25"E -- A2 Jigani U/W 12°47'12.46"N 77°38'16.00"E 1.0 WNW A3 Doddathoguru C/W 12°50'58.20"N 77°39'15.70"E 6.9 N A4 Bommasandra D/W 12°48'29.73"N 77°42'1.30"E 5.8 ENE A5 Ramakrishnapura D/W 12°46'58.12"N 77°41'42.57"E 4.7 E A6 Byagadadenahalli C/W 12°45'7.48"N 77°42'6.16"E 6.6 SE A7 Indalavadi C/W 12°43'43.65"N 77°38'27.15"E 5.8 SSW A8 Hullahalli C/W 12°49'32.01"N 77°36'55.95"E 5.5 NW

3.7.5.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency

Ambient air quality was monitored twice in a week for One (01) season (shall cover 12 weeks), i.e. during Post Monsoon season (September to November, 2016).

PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Pb, NH3, C6H6, C20H12, As, Ni, were monitored on 24 hourly basis and

O3 and CO were monitored on eight hourly basis and VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are monitored on 2 hrly basis. Sampling was carried out as per Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) monitoring guidelines at each location. Analytical methods used for analysis of parameters are given in Table 3-7.

Table 3-7: Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters

S.No Parameters Analytical method NAAQ standards: 2009 Sampling Time

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), IS:5182(Part-2):2001 1 50 (Annual) 80(24 Hours) 24 Hours μg/m3 (Reaff:2006)

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), 2 IS: 5182 (Part - 6): 2006 40 (Annual) 80 (24 Hours) 24 Hours μg/m3 Particulate Matter 3 IS: 5182 (Part - 23): 2006 40 (Annual) 60 (24 hours) 24 Hours (PM2.5), μg/m3

Particulate Matter 4 IS:5182 (Part– 23): 2006 60 (Annual) 100 (24 hours) 24 Hours (PM10), μg/m3

Page 79 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

IS:5182(Part–10):1999 5 CO mg/m3 2 (8 hours) 4 (1hour) 8 Hours (Reaff:2006) IS:5182(Part–22):2004 6 Pb μg/m3 0.5(Annual) 1(24 hours) 24 Hours (Reaff:2006) 7 O3, μg/m3 IS: 5182 (Part – 9): 1974 100(8hours) 180 (1hour) 8 Hours APHA(air) 2nd edition 8 NH3, μg/m3 100(Annual) 400(24 hours) 8 Hours (Indophenol-blue method) IS:5182(Part–11):1999 9 Benzene, μg/m3 5 (Annual) 5 (Annual) 24 Hours (RA:2009) Benzo (a) pyrene, 10 IS:5182(Part–12):2004(RA:2009) 1 (Annual) 1 (Annual) 24 Hours ng/m3 11 Arsenic, ng/ m3 APHA (air) 2nd edition 6 (Annual) 6 (Annual) 24 Hours Volatile Organic PID (Photo-Ionization Detection) 12 -- -- 2 Hours Compounds (ppm) Method 13 Chlorine (µg/m3) IS 5182 (part 19):1982(Ref 2003) -- -- 2 Hours Hydrochloric acid 14 NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours (µg/m3) Hydrobromic acid 15 NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours (µg/m3) Hydrogen sulphide 16 IS 5182 (part 7) : 1973(Ref 2003) -- -- 2 Hours (µg/m3) Hydrogen fluoride 17 NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours (µg/m3)

3.7.5.3 Results and Discussions

The variations of the pollutants PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO, Pb, O3 , NH3 , C6H6, C20 H12, As, Ni,

VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are compared with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), MoEF&CC Notification, November, 2009. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data (September to November, 2016) for the study area is given in Table 3-8 to Table 3-17 and trends of measured ambient concentration in the study area were graphically represented in Figure 3-22 to Figure 3-28

Page 80 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-8: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants Benzo CO SO2 NO2 PM10 PM2.5 Pb O3 NH3 Benzen (a) Arsenic(As) Nickel (Ni) S.No Location Name (mg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3 (µg/m3 (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) pyrene (ng/m3) (ng/m3) (ng/m3) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 1 Project Site 11.0 24.7 50.26 24.19 (DL 0.05) 0.019 17.11 7.1 (DL 1) (DL 1) (DL 2) (DL 10) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2 Jigani 11.1 24.9 60.4 27.2 (DL 0.05) 0.012 13.3 6.44 (DL 1) (DL 1) (DL 2) (DL 10) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 3 Doddathoguru 10.6 21.7 58.3 25.3 (DL 0.05) 0.013 12.6 5.87 (DL 1) (DL 1) (DL 2) (DL 10) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4 Bommasandra 8.7 17.6 48.4 19.5 (DL 0.05) 0.01 14.1 5.64 (DL 1) (DL 1) (DL 2) (DL 10) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 5 Ramakrishnapura 9.5 20.5 56.6 24.7 (DL 0.05) 0.012 11.3 5.35 (DL 1) (DL 1) (DL 2) (DL 10) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 6 Byagadadenahalli 7.65 18.6 51.6 21.7 (DL 0.05) 0.017 (DL10) (DL 5) (DL 1) (DL 1) (DL 2) (DL 10) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 7 Indalavadi 8.45 19.6 54.4 22.6 (DL 0.05) 0.11 10.6 6.37 (DL 1) (DL 1) (DL 2) (DL 10)

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 8 Hullahalli 8.01 16.4 46.6 17.9 (DL 0.05) BDL BDL (DL 1) (DL 1) (DL 2) (DL 10) 0.011 (DL10) (DL 5) Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)

Page 81 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-9: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants Volatile Organic Hydrogen Hydrogen Hydrochloric Hydrobromic Compounds Chlorine sulphide fluoride S.No Location Name acid acid (ppm) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) BDL BDL BDL BDL 1 Project Site BDL(DL 6) 3.71 (DL 145) (DL 140) (DL 35) (DL 350) BDL BDL BDL BDL 2 Jigani BDL(DL 6) 3.61 (DL 145) (DL 140) (DL 35) (DL 350) BDL BDL BDL BDL 3 Doddathoguru BDL(DL 6) 2.05 (DL 145) (DL 140) (DL 35) (DL 350) BDL BDL BDL BDL 4 Bommasandra BDL(DL 6) BDL(0.1) (DL 145) (DL 140) (DL 35) (DL 350) BDL BDL BDL BDL 5 Ramakrishnapura BDL(DL 6) 1.33 (DL 145) (DL 140) (DL 35) (DL 350) BDL BDL BDL BDL 6 Byagadadenahalli BDL(DL 6) BDL(0.1) (DL 145) (DL 140) (DL 35) (DL 350) BDL BDL BDL BDL 7 Indalavadi BDL(DL 6) BDL(0.1) (DL 145) (DL 140) (DL 35) (DL 350) BDL BDL BDL 8 Hullahalli BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350) BDL(0.1) (DL 145) (DL 140) (DL 35) Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)

Page 82 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-10: Ambient PM10 Monitoring Data

PM10 Concentration g/m³ S.No Location Name Minimum µg/m3 Maximum, µg/m3 Average, µg/m3 98th Percentile 1 Project Site 47.5 55.3 50.3 28.1 2 Jigani 58.2 64.3 60.4 28.3 3 Doddathoguru 52.6 62.6 58.4 23.7 4 Bommasandra 44.5 55.8 48.4 25.3 5 Ramakrishnapura 48.3 63.5 56.6 23.5 6 Byagadadenahalli 46.5 55.2 51.2 23.6 7 Indalavadi 47.5 58.4 54.3 23.3 8 Hullahalli 42.3 55.2 46.6 18.5

Figure 3-22 Trends of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 83 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-11: Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring Data

PM2.5 Concentration, µg/m3 S.No Location Name Minimum Maximum, Average, 98th µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 Percentile 1 Project Site 18.4 28.5 24.2 28.0 2 Jigani 23.2 29.5 27.2 29.3

3 Doddathoguru 23.2 27.5 25.3 27.3 4 Bommasandra 13.1 23.1 19.5 23.1 5 Ramakrishnapura 20.8 27.2 24.6 27.1 6 Byagadadenahalli 18.4 29.5 21.7 29.0

7 Indalavadi 18.4 25.6 22.6 25.5

8 Hullahalli 13.3 23.1 17.9 23.1

Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient PM2.5 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 84 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-12 : Ambient SO2 Monitoring Data

SO2 Concentration, µg/m3 S.No Location Name Minimum Average, 98th Maximum, µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 Percentile 1 Project Site 7.80 13.8 11.0 13.6 2 Jigani 5.00 13.8 11.2 13.6 3 Doddathoguru 7.80 12.6 10.6 12.4 4 Bommasandra 6.10 13.5 8.70 13.2 5 Ramakrishnapura 7.50 12.6 9.85 12.6 6 Byagadadenahalli 6.40 9.80 7.65 9.80 7 Indalavadi 6.40 13.0 8.45 11.5 8 Hullahalli 6.40 9.80 8.00 9.75

Figure 3-24: Trends of Measured Ambient SO2 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 85 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-13: Ambient NO2 Monitoring Data

NO2 Concentration, µg/m3

S.No Location Name Minimum Maximum Average 98th Percentile µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3

1 Project Site 20.4 29.1 24.7 28.1 2 Jigani 21.2 28.6 24.9 28.3 3 Doddathoguru 15.6 23.8 21.7 23.7 4 Bommasandra 11.6 26.8 17.7 25.3 5 Ramakrishnapura 17.8 23.6 20.4 23.5 6 Byagadadenahalli 10.2 23.6 18.6 23.6 7 Indalavadi 13.8 23.5 19.7 23.3 8 Hullahalli 12.4 19.2 16.4 18.5

Figure 3-25: Trends of Measured Ambient NO2 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 86 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-14: Ambient Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring Data

CO Concentration, mg/m3 S.No Location Name Minimum Maximum Average 98th Percentile mg/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3 1 Project Site 0.005 0.170 0.019 0.101 2 Jigani 0.005 0.022 0.012 0.021 3 Doddathoguru 0.005 0.018 0.013 0.018 4 Bommasandra 0.005 0.019 0.011 0.019 5 Ramakrishnapura 0.005 0.018 0.012 0.018 6 Byagadadenahalli 0.005 0.009 0.017 0.009

7 Indalavadi 0.010 0.210 0.111 0.201 8 Hullahalli 0.005 0.013 0.011 0.011 Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit

Figure 3-26: Trends of Measured Ambient CO Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 87 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-15: Ambient Ozone (O3) Monitoring Data

O3 Concentration, µg/m3 S.No Location Name Minimum Maximum Average 98th Percentile µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 1 Project Site 14.6 19.4 17.0 19.0 2 Jigani 11.2 16.5 13.9 16.4 3 Doddathoguru 10.2 14.6 12.4 14.6 4 Bommasandra 10.5 15.6 13.1 15.5 5 Ramakrishnapura 11.2 13.5 12.4 13.5 6 Byagadadenahalli 10.2 13.6 11.9 13.6 7 Indalavadi 10.4 11.2 10.8 11.9 8 Hullahalli 10.6 14.6 12.6 15.2

Figure 3-27: Trends of Measured Ambient O3 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 88 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-16: Ambient Ammonia (NH3) Monitoring Data

NH3 Concentration, µg/m3 S.No Location Name Minimum Maximum Average 98th Percentile µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 1 Project Site 4.80 8.80 7.11 8.75 2 Jigani 5.40 7.28 6.42 7.27 3 Doddathoguru 4.20 7.50 5.86 7.39 4 Bommasandra 4.50 7.60 5.64 7.42 5 Ramakrishnapura BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) 6 Byagadadenahalli 4.20 6.50 4.91 6.36 7 Indalavadi 4.80 7.29 6.39 7.29 8 Hullahalli BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5)

Figure 3-28: Trends of Measured Ambient NH3 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 89 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-17: Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Monitoring Data

VOCs Concentration, µg/m3

S.No Location Name Minimum Maximum Average 98th Percentile µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3

1 Project Site 2.10 5.50 3.75 5.50 2 Jigani 2.10 5.40 3.60 5.40

3 Doddathoguru 1.20 4.70 2.53 4.70 4 Bommasandra BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)

5 Ramakrishnapura 0.05 3.00 1.30 3.00 BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) 6 Byagadadenahalli BDL(DL0.1) 7 Indalavadi BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) 8 Hullahalli BDL(DL0.1) Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit

3.7.5.4 Observations

Maximum concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO, Pb, O3 , NH3 , C6H6, C20 H12, As, Ni

VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Industrial, Commercial and Residential areas at all monitoring locations during the study period.

3.8 Noise Environment

The prevailing ambient noise level at a particular location is nothing but the resultant (total) of all kinds of noise sources existing at various distances around that location. The ambient noise level at a location varies continuously depending on the type of surrounding activities.

Ambient noise levels have been established by monitoring noise levels at eight (08) locations in and around 10Km distance from project area during September to November, 2016 using precision noise level meter. The noise monitoring locations in the study area were selected after giving due consideration to the various land use categories. The land use categories include commercial, residential, rural and sensitive areas. Noise levels were recorded on an hourly basis for one complete day at each location using pre- calibrated noise levels. A map showing the monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-34.

3.8.1 Results and Discussions

Page 90 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Based on the recorded hourly noise levels at each monitoring location, the day equivalent (Ld) and night equivalent (Ln) were calculated;

 Ld: Average noise levels between 6:00 hours to 22.00 hours.

 Ln: Average noise levels between 22:00 hours to 6.00 hours.

The Day-Night (Ldn) equivalent noise levels were calculated using the US Environmental Protection Agency formula:

Ld/10 Ln+10/10 Ldn = 10 Log [0.0416 {16 (10 ) + 8 (10 )}]

The comparison of day equivalent noise levels (Ld) and night equivalent noise levels (Ln) with the respective CPCB stipulated noise standards for various land use categories are shown in theTable 3-18.

Table 3-18: Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels Noise level in CPCB Standard Distance dB(A) Leq S. Location (km) from Azimuth Environmental Location No Code Project Direction LNight Setting Day Night Lday (Ld) boundary (Ln) 1. Project Site N1 - 73.4 71.5 75 70 Industrial 2. Jigani N2 1 WNW 77.3 71.0 75 70 Industrial 3. Doddathoguru N3 6.9 N 78.1 73.5 55 45 4. Bommasandra N4 5.8 ENE 67.2 61.4 55 45 5. Ramakrishnapura N5 4.7 E 73.6 69.4 55 45 Residential 6. Byagadadenahalli N6 6.6 SE 78.0 73.6 55 45 7. Indalavadi N7 5.8 SSW 84.5 78.0 55 45 8. Hullahalli N8 5.5 NW 83.9 78.9 55 45

3.8.2 Observations

It is observed that the day equivalent and night equivalent noise levels at all locations are within prescribed CPCB standards

 Day equivalent noise levels (Ld) ranged between 67.2 dB(A) to 84.5 dB (A)

 Night equivalent noise levels (Ln) ranged between 61.4 dB (A) to 78.9 dB (A).

The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels were slightly exceeded the prescribed standards by MoEF&CC. 3.9 Water Environment 3.9.1 Surface Water Resources

Page 91 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

There are about 109 water bodies including small and large natural/manmade within 10Km radius from proposed project site. Realignment of storm water drainage without disturbance shall be made in accordance with existing natural drainage forming as grid type arrangement based on the natural slope (gravity flow) which finally discharges into major water bodies. The study area consists of the Hennagara lake in the southern region, Ramakrishnapura lake in the part of East South Eastern region. The Hebbagodi and Kammasandra lake in the North Eastern/North north Eastern part from the project site. As the Bommasandra Industrial Area estate lies in the Northeastern region, the representative surface water sampling locations have been chosen. The List of major water bodies nearby project site is given in Table 3-19. Photographs of Existing major water bodies are given in Table 3-19.

Table 3-19: List of Major Water Bodies within 10Km radius S.No Name of the Water bodies Distance Direction 1 Hennagara lake 3.2 SE 2 Ramakrishnapura lake 4.5 ESE 3 Chandapura lake 5.3 ENE 4 Kammasandra Lake 5.7 NE 5 Hebbagodi lake 4.9 NE 6 VeerasandraKere Lake 6.3 NE 7 Thirumangondan halli Lake 8.4 ENE 8 Marsur Lake 7.2 ESE 9 Settahalli lake 8.3 ESE 10 Meenakshi Lake 9.0 NW 11 Chikka Togur lake 7.4 NNE 12 Rayasandra lake 8.8 NNE 13 Yelenahallikere 9.4 NW 14 Muthanallur lake 8.3 ENE 15 Doddkammanahalli Lake 9.3 NNW

Page 92 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Hennagara Lake Chandapura Lake

Kammasandra Lake Hebbagodi lake

Figure 3-29 Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area

Page 93 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-20: Water bodies in 10km radius of Project area

Name of Water body/Nearest Distance from Area Centre of Water body S.No Direction Nearby villages Location Project Site(Km) Acres Hectares Latitude Longitude 1. Begur Lake Ckikka Begur 120 52’ 770 37’ 9.72 NNW 116.90 47.25 Gyanappanahalli 25.25” 48.87” Subash Nagar 2. Rayasandra Naganathapura 120 52’ 770 41’ 9.05 NNE 73.06 29.57 Ghattihalli 34.75” 27.05” Cudasandra 3. Naganathapura Rayasandra Dooda,Chikka Nagamangala 120 52’ 770 40’ 8.54 NNE 77.53 31.36 Chenna Keshavanagar 10.75” 36.55” Singasandra 4. Chenna Keshavanagar Dooda,Chikka Nagamangala 120 51’ 770 40’ 7.06 NNE 31.04 12.59 Naganathapura 56.77” 19.63” 5. Near Gulimangala Huskur 120 51’ 770 41’ 8.52 NE 25.65 10.37 Chikka Nagamangala 18.73” 46.83” Shantipura 6. Near Shantipura Chikka,Dodda Nagamangala 120 51’ 770 41’ 6.15 NE 11.24 4.54 Gulimangala 14.52” 22.50’’ Govindachettipalya 7. Near Govindachettipalya Electronic City Dodda, Chikka 120 51’ 770 40’ 7.69 NNE 15.88 6.41 Nagamangala 24.76’’ 20.25” Konappana Agrahara 8. Near Govindachettipalya Electronic City Dodda, Chikka 120 51’ 770 39’ 7.74 NNE 11.74 4.76 Nagamangala 33.40” 59.56” Konappana Agrahara 9. Near Chenna Keshavanagar Singasandra 120 51’ 770 39’ 8.39 N 15.10 6.09 Basapura 56.09” 37.66” Chikka Togur 10. Near Subhash nagar Basapura Singasandra 120 52’ 770 38’ 8.79 NNW 9.54 3.82 Chenna keshavanagar 10.91” 58.89” Begur 11. Near Subhash nagar Basapura 120 52’ 770 38’ 8.76 NNW 11.03 4.47 Singasandra 07.49” 38.40’’

Page 94 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Chenna keshavanagar Begur 12. Near Tejeswininagar Gyanappanahalli 120 51’ 770 36’ 9.51 NW 1.42 0.53 Begur 58.96” 50.95” 13. Near Tejeswininagar Chikka Kammanahalli 120 51’ 770 37’ 8..68 NW 7.4 2.98 Begur 33.19” 00.79” 14. Near Tejeswininagar Chikka Kammanahalli 120 51’ 770 37’ 8.26 NW 20.35 8.20 Begur 28.77” 23.69” Ittasandra 15. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 120 51’ 770 36’ 9.19 NW 16.12 6.29 Tejeswininagar 19.48’’ 13.84” 16. Near Weavers Colony Vaddarpalya 120 51’ 770 35’ 9.83 NW 28.32 11.42 Chikka Kammanahalli 09.89” 24.47” 17. Near Chikka Kammanahalli Weavers Colony 120 50’ 770 36’ 8.65 NW 4.93 2.02 Tejeswininagar 55.33” 11.48” 18. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 120 51’ 770 37’ 8.07 NW 9.70 3.95 Tejeswininagar 10.95” 00.69” 19. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 120 50’ 770 37’ 7.24 NW 4.30 1.73 Bettadasanapura 57.19” 19.80” 20. Near Ittasandra Vaddarpalya 120 51’ 770 37’ 7.36 NW 12.10 4.93 Bettadasanapura 12.41” 58.75’’ 21. Near Vaddarpalya Ittasandra 120 51’ 770 38’ 6.80 NNW 12.16 4.94 Chikka Togur DoddaTogur 02.71” 39.27” Konappana Agrahara 22. Near Konappana Agrahara Chikka Togur Basapura 120 51’ 770 39’ 7.39 N 36.74 14.87 Govindachettipalya, Dodda 25.29” 32.84” Togur Electronic City 23. Near Govindachettipalya Konappana Agrahara 120 50’ 770 40’ 6.55 NNE 5.87 2.38 Electronic City 51.49” 25.04” Shantipura 24. Near Govindachettipalya 120 50’ 770 40’ 6.50 NNE 10.67 4.33 Virsandra 45.86” 26.65” 25. Near lakshminarayanapura Gottamaranahalli Gulimangala 120 50’ 770 42’ 8.45 NE 29.49 11.87 Shantipura 49.13” 28.78” Chintalamadavala 26. Near Chintalamadavala Gottamaranahalli 120 50’ 770 43’ 9.15 NE 124.51 50.35 Gulimangala 46.11” 05.69”

Page 95 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Vaddarpalya Shingena Agrahara Kaggalipura Gopasandra Chikka Timmasandra 27. Muttanallur Kere Lakshmisagara Hilalige R S Ramasagara 120 49’ 770 43’ 8.69 ENE 244.49 98.96 Alibommasandra 19.93” 42.05” Muttanallur Bendiganahalli Somanahalli 28. Near Hilaligi Bommasandra 5.90 ENE 24.89 10.07 Lakshmisagara 120 49’ 1.96” 770 42’ 9.15’’ Ramasagara 29. Near Bangalapet Vidyanagar (Kammasandra) Shree Ananthnagar 120 49’ 770 41’ 5.85 ENE 50.33 20.38 Vaddarpalya 32.34” 39.62” Hilaligi 30. Hebgodi Lake Gollahalli Virsandra 120 49’ 770 40’ 5.00 NE 3.64 1.46 Shree Ananthnagar 43.89” 49.09” Bangalapet 31. Near Gollahalli Virsandra Hebgodi 120 49’ 770 40’ 4.64 NE 34.13 13.78 Tirupalya 52.83” 20.73’’ Bangalapet Shinkaripalya 32. Near Gollahalli Hebgodi Tirupalya 120 49’ 4.18 NE 16.94 6.84 Maragondanahalli 770 40’ 3.34” 35.45” Virsandra Shinkaripalya 33. Near Maragondanahalli Shinkaripalya Gollahalli 120 49’ 770 39’ 4.10 NNE 9.32 3.80 Hebgodi 37.86” 44.46” Tirupalya 34. Near Shinkaripalya Maragondanahalli 120 50’ 4.65 NNW 18.30 7.41 Electronic City 770 39’ 8.05” 00.71” Bettadasanapura

Page 96 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Podu 35. Near Virsandra Shree Ananthnagar 120 50’ 770 40’ 5.83 NNE 13.69 5.49 Shinkaripalya 22.61” 29.66” Electronic City 36. Near Virsandra Dodda Togur 120 50’ 770 40’ 5.75 NNE 10.12 4.11 Electronic City 27.98” 14.19” Shinkaripalya 37. Near Podu Binjipura 120 49’ 770 37’ 5.23 NW 22.43 9.03 Bettadasanapura 58.06” 50.66’’ Chittikarepalya 38. Near Bettadasanapura 120 50’ 770 37’ 6.97 NW 9.56 3.88 Chikka Kammanahalli 41.62’’ 20.83” 39. Near Chittekarepalya 120 50’ 6.54 NW 4.76 1.93 Dinne Palya 770 37’ 1.44’’ 13.39’’ 40. Near Dinnepalya Chittikarepalya 120 50’ 770 36’ 7.06 NW 14.98 6.08 Chikka Kammanahalli 15.25” 35.93’’ 41. Near Kalkere R.F 120 49’ 770 34’ 9.65 WNW 5.52 2.24 Shanuboganahalli 54.21” 31.59’’ 42. Near Timmayyanadoddi Sampigeramanagara 120 49’ 770 35’ 8.19 WNW 3.42 1.39 Kalkere R.F 50.09” 29.34” 43. Near Chittekarepalya Dinnepalya 120 49’ 770 36’ 6.51 NW 7.17 2.93 Timmayyanadoddi 55.32” 42.26” Hakkibikki Colony 44. Near Chittekarepalya Binjipura 120 49’ 770 37’ 5.65 NW 9.71 3.94 Hakkibikki Colony 48.13’’ 16.31’’ 45. Near Hakkibikki Colony Bodigrama 120 49’ 770 36’ 6.42 WNW 21.32 8.65 Salindra Doddi 35.88” 20.92” Sampigeramanagara 46. Near Hakkibikki Colony Salindra Doddi Chittekarepalya 120 49’ 770 36’ 5.55 WNW 49.07 19.85 Bodigrama 18.45” 48.79” Chinnagodanapalya 47. Near Sampigeramanagara Bodigrama 120 49’ 770 35’ 7.60 WNW 13.31 5.39 Salindra Doddi 27.19’’ 34.36’’ Lakshmipura 48. Near Bingipura Hulimangala 120 49’ 770 37’ 4.51 NW 10.35 4.19 Chinnagodanapalya 20.51” 38.86” Hakkibikki Colony 49. Near Hulimangala 3.86 NW 50.59 20.48 Kempapura 120 49 7.05” 770 37’

Page 97 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Binjipura 55.94” Chinnagodanapalya 50. Near nanjapura Vabsandra Hulimangala 120 48’ 770 38’ 2.55 NNW 14.89 6.02 Kempapura 36.72” 34.10” Kyalasanahalli 51. Near Kyalasanahalli Srirampura Vabsandra 120 48’ 770 39’ 1.41 NNW 17.84 7.14 Tarandahalli 15.22” 18.09” Kachanayakanahalli Colony 52. Near Yarandahalli Srirampura 120 48’ 2.09 NNE 8.26 3.35 Kachanayakanahalli Colony 770 40’ 4.10” 22.46” Vabsandra 53. Near Kachanayakanahalli Colony Yarandahalli Srirampura 770 40’ 2.49 ENE 21.92 8.84 120 48’ 9.40” Yellamana Mandira 35.24” Kachanayakanahalli 54. Near Bommasandra Industrial Yarandahalli Area Kachanayakanahalli 120 48’ 770 41’ 4.17 ENE 23.26 9.39 Bommasandra 31.50” 20.84’’ Chandapura 55. Chandapura Lake Kittiganahalli Bommasandra 120 48’ 770 42’ 5.29 ENE 23.83 9.67 Hale Chandapura 20.05” 17.88” Lakshmisagara 56. Near Hale Chandapura Chandapura Kittiganahalli Hilaligi 120 48’ 6.74 ENE 9.09 3.67 770 43’ 0.47” Bommasandra 18.64” Lakshmisagara Guddehatti 57. Near Bendiganahalli Ambedkar Colony Hale Chandapura 120 48’ 770 44’ 9.51 ENE 15.66 6.41 Lakshmisagara 38.53” 31.42” Guddehatti 58. Near Guddehatti Ambedkar Colony 120 47’ 770 44’ 9.25 E 8.36 3.34 Hale Chandapura 98.58” 29.59” Lakshmisagara 59. Near Guddehatti Bendiganahalli 120 47’ 770 44’ 9.65 E 14.82 5.99 Neralur 55.24” 41.87’

Page 98 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Yadavanhalli 60. Near Neralur Tirumagondanahalli Chandapura 120 47’ 770 43’ 7.10 E 43.03 17.32 Hale Chandapura 49.51” 18.35’’ Sainagar Ambedkarnagar 61. Near Tirumagondanahalli Neralur Sainagar 120 47’ 6.60 ESE 8.4 3.37 770 43’ 2.73’’ Igaluru 29.22” Banahalli 62. Near Sai nagar Neralur Tirumagondanahalli 120 47’ 8.53 E 1.39 0.57 Yadavanhalli 770 44’ 2.84’’ 16.47’’ Ambedkarnagar Baligaranahalli 63. Near Mastenahalli Hosahalli Hennagara 120 47’ 770 39’ 0.69 ENE 15.81 6.42 Srirampura 32.94’’ 47.98’’ Bandenalasandra 64. Near Bandenalasandra Kyalasanahalli Srirampura 120 47’ 770 39’ 0.42 N 21.36 8.64 Mastenahalli 41.58’’ 13.42” Jigani market 65. Jigani Kere Koppa Kyalasanahalli 120 47’ 770 37’ 2.24 WNW 194.56 78.70 Bandenalasandra 45.19’’ 54.78’’ Holamanchinahalli Harapanahalli 66. Bidarakere Nalsandra 770 36’ 4.70 WNW 74.06 30.01 Koppa 120 48’ 2.17” 37.34” Begihalli 67. Near Manatapa Jangalpalya Ramasandra 120 48’ 6.41 WNW 40.53 16.4 Nalsandra 770 36’ 0.53’’ 35.77’’ Kariappanahalli Hullakasavanahalli 68. Near Jangalpalya Ramasandra Nalsandra 120 48’ 770 35’ 6.90 WNW 5.90 2.38 Kariappanahalli 49.43” 42.95” Hullakasavanahalli

Page 99 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Manatapa 69. Near Sampigehalli Vajarahalli Kariappanahalli 120 48’ 770 34’ 8.14 W 17.57 7.11 Jangalpalya 23.96’’ 54.44’’ Kempanayakanahalli 70. Near Begihalli Vaddarapalya 120 47’ 770 36’ 4.29 W 6.73 2.69 Harapanahalli 37.91’’ 29.60’’ 71. Near Ramasagara Vaddarapalya 120 46’ 770 36’ 4.22 WSW 3.96 1.60 Harapanahalli 57.63” 55.12’’ Bukkasagara 72. Near Ramasagara Harapanahalli 770 37’ 3.34 WSW 11.58 4.70 Bukkasagara 120 47’ 1.30’’ 20.43’ Holamanchinahalli 73. Near Kallabalu Bukkasagara 120 46’ 770 37’ 3.92 WSW 8.83 3.54 Jigani Industrial Area 24.34” 16.01’’ 74. Hennagara Kere Mastenahalli Hennagara Rajapura 120 46’ 770 39’ 2.72 ESE 399.65 161.73 Sitanayakanahalli 38.80’’ 40.59’’ Vaddarpalya Holamanchinahalli Bandenalasandra 75. Near Rajapura Hinnakki Sitanayakanahalli 120 46’ 770 40’ 2.81 ESE 69.90 28.29 Lingapura 23.58” 38.55” Hennagara 76. Ramakrishnapura Lake 120 46’ 770 41’ 4.46 ESE 12.80 5.09 Hinnakki 40.06” 45.54” Igaluru 77. Near Ramakrishnapura 120 46’ 770 42’ 5.34 E 17.39 7.06 Naganayanahalli 51.31” 15.67” 78. Near Adesonatti Bandapura Madivala 120 46’ 7.05 ESE 22.29 9.01 Marasur 770 43’ 9.61” 23.48” Naganayanahalli Ramakrishnapura 79. Near baligaranahalli Ichanguru Veddarayapalya 120 46’ 770 44’ 8.86 ESE 29.01 11.72 Krishnasagara 35.15” 14.70” Ambedkarnagar Bandapura

Page 100 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

80. Near Kambalipura Madivala Mutsandra 120 45’ 9.28 ESE 96.24 38.92 770 44’ 6.66” Shettihalli 25.93” Maisandra 81. Near Shettihalli Marasur 120 45’ 770 42’ 7.22 SE 121.97 49.37 Byagadadenahalli 12.57” 50.38” Haleuru 82. Near Shettihalli 120 44’ 770 43’ 8.34 SE 55.73 22.53 Avadenahalli Tattanahalli 57.51” 18.30” 83. Near Murasur Haleuru 120 45’ 770 42’ 6.40 SE 11.63 4.79 Naganayakanahalli, 39.34” 29.08” Byagadadenhalli 84. Near Naganayakanahalli Hinnaki Lingapura 120 46’ 770 41’ 4.39 ESE 16.59 6.72 Dodda Hagade 10.68” 29.32” Marasur 85. Near Dyavasandra Haragadde Vaddarapalya 120 45’ 3.20 SW 45.38 18.37 770 39’ 8.30” Wayanahalli 30.70” Bommandahalli 86. Near Konasandra Dyavasandra 120 45’ 770 38’ 3.34 WSW 15.29 6.20 Bommandahalli 36.88” 31.34” Vaddarapalya 87. Near Konasandra Vaddarapalya 120 45’ 770 38’ 2.91 WSW 17.43 7.04 Jigani Industrial Area 54.56” 19.09” Mahanthalingapura 88. Near Jigani Industrial Area Mahanthalingapura 120 46’ 770 37’ 3.01 WSW 15.22 6.16 Vaddarapalya 13.44” 57.79” Konasandra 89. Near Mahanthalingapura Kallabalu Giddanehalli 120 45’ 770 36’ 5.01 WSW 6.51 2.69 Goninayakanadoddi 55.56” 52.46” Kasinakuntedoddi 90. Near Kunmadiwala Byagadadenhalli 120 44’ 6.53 ESE 41.47 16.81 Chennaha Agrahara 770 42’ 4.07” 51.43” Avadenahalli 91. Near Yellamnanapalya Kun Madiwala 770 41’ 5.26 ESE 12.97 5.22 Dodda Hagade 120 45’ 9.21” 20.53” Byagadadenhalli 92. Near Sappanalli 4.25 ESE 19.59 7.89 Dodda Hagade 120 45’ 770 40’

Page 101 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Yellamnanapalya 11.74” 30.06” Wayanahalli 93. Near Kumbarnahalli Nosenuru 770 39’ 4.01 SSE 8.56 3.43 Haragadde 120 45’ 6.42” 40.14” Dyavasandra 94. Near Krishnanadoddi 770 36’ 6.31 SE 4.89 1.99 Ragihalli 120 45’ 0.85” 41.06” 95. Near Jekkanahalla Hebbala 120 43’ 770 36’ 8.27 SW 14.62 5.91 Huruganadoddi 44.64” 26.79” 96. Near Nosenuru Nosenuru Gollahalli 120 44’ 770 39’ 4.92 SSE 25.62 10.36 Kumbarnahalli 35.18” 26.78” Suragijakkanahalli 97. Near Yellamnanapalya Dodda Hagade 770 41’ 5.62 ESE 12.76 5.18 Byagadadenhalli 120 45’ 8.73’’ 20.83” Kunmadiwala 98. Near Chikka hagade Chennena Agrahara Vaderahalli 120 44’ 770 41’ 6.65 SE 200.38 81.02 Hosakote 13.69” 35.90” Kempu Vedarahalli 99. Near Dodda Hagade Soppanalli Kempu Vedarahalli 120 44’ 5.78 SE 10.82 4.40 770 41’ 1.75” Chennena Agrahara 34.78” Chikka hagade 100. Near Medihalli Gourenahalli Bodrahalli 120 42’ 8.59 SE 108.26 43.79 770 41’ 5.16’ Anekal 56.25” Kaval Hosahalli 101. Near Kembu Vedarahalli Suragijakkanahalli 770 40’ 6.43 SE 18.60 7.5 Vaddarapalya 120 44’7.56” 52.51” Chikka hagade 102. Near Suragijakkanahalli Vaddarapalya Chikka hagade 770 40’ 6.51 SSE 12.36 5.02 120 44\ 4.55” Kembu Vedarahalli 30.21” Honnakalasapura 103. Near Honnakalasapura Sidi Hosakote 120 43’ 770 40’ 7.32 SSE 21.99 8.89 Siddanapalya 31.20” 39.45” Gourenahalli 104. Near Gourenahalli Medihalli 770 40’ 7.87 SSE 12.73 5.11 Siddanapalya 120 43’ 7.10” 18.96” Aaiyanapalya

Page 102 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

105. Near Aduru Vaddarapalya 120 43’ 6.21 SSE 16.70 6.72 Sonnayakanapura 770 39’ 7.95” 54.51” Nosenuru Gollahalli 106. Near Sonnayakanapura Siddanapalya Aaiyanapalya 120 43’ 770 39’ 6.95 SSE 9.06 3.66 Timmasandra 25.03” 19.00” Nagaiyanadoddi 107. Near Chikkanahalli Timmasandra 770 38’ 7.73 SSW 7.24 2.98 Nagaiyanadoddi 120 43’ 4.94” 52.48” Indlavadipura 108. Near Indlavadipura Timmasandra 120 42’ 770 38’ 8.16 SSW 5.85 2.3 Nagaiyanadoddi 54.69” 34.00” Nallaiyanadoddi 109. Near Kadujakkanahalli Nosenuru Gollahalli 120 44’ 770 38’ 5.69 SSW 12.04 4.80 Aduru 15.45” 23.96” Indlavadi 110. 3512.01 1420.24

Page 103 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment

To establish the baseline status of water environment, the existing representative sampling locations for surface water within a radial distance of 10Km from project site have been selected as per CPCB guidelines of Water Quality Monitoring through an adequate survey of the project area. Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters is given in Table 3-21.

Table 3-21: Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters S. No Parameter Measured Test Method 1 pH (at 25°C) IS:3025 (Part - 11): 1983 (Reaff: 2006) 2 Electrical Conductivity IS:3025 (Part - 14): 1983 (Reaff: 2006) 3 Color IS:3025 (Part- 4) 1983 (Reaff 2006) 4 Total Hardness as CaCO3 IS:3025 (Part - 21) 1983 (Reaff 2006) 5 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 IS:3025,1 (Part - 23) 1986 (Reaff 2009) 6 Cadmium IS:3025 (Part 41) 1991 7 Chloride as Cl IS:3025 (Part - 32) 1988(Reaff 2009) 8 Total Dissolved Solids IS:3025:1(Part - 16) 1984 (Reaff 2006) 9 Aluminium as Al IS:3025 (Part - 55) 2003 (Reaff 2009) 10 Chromium as Cr IS:3025 (Part - 52) 2003 (Reaff 2009) 11 Lead as Pb IS:3025 (Part - 47) 1994 (Reaff 2009) 12 Zinc as Zn IS:3025 (Part - 49) 1994 (Reaff 2009) 13 Sodium as Na IS:3025,5(Part - 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006) 14 Temperature IS:3025 (Part - 9) 1983 (Reaff 2006) 15 Chemical oxygen demand as O2 IS:3025 (Part-58)-2006 16 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) IS:3025 (Part - 38)1989 (Reaff 2009) 17 Salinity - 18 Copper as Cu IS:3025 (Part - 42)1992 (Reaff: 2009) 19 BOD,5 days @200C as O2 5210B APHA22nd Edn 2012

The prevailing status of water quality at eight sampling locations each for ground water and surface water has been assessed during September – November 2016 are presented in Table 3-22. Surface water quality results are provided in Table 3-23. A map showing the monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-35.

Table 3-22: Details of Surface water sampling locations Distance from Project Direction from S.No Name of the Water body Boundary project boundary 1 Hennagara lake 3.2 SE 2 Ramakrishnapura 4.5 ESE lake 3 Chandapura lake 5.3 ENE 4 Kammasandra 5.7 NE Lake 5 Hebbagodi lake 4.9 NE 6 Chikka Togur Lake 7.4 NNE 7 Meenakshi Lake 9.0 NW 8 Bommandahalli 4.7 ENE

Page 104 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-23: Surface water Monitoring Results DW Standards (IS S.No Parameters Units SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 SW-6 SW-7 SW-8 10500:2012) Acceptable Limit 1 Source - - Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake BDL BD BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2 Colour Hazen 5 (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) 3 pH at 25°C - 6.5 to 8.5 7.17 7.26 7.32 7.63 7.12 7.42 7.35 7.45 4 Turbidity NTU 1 25.4 2.80 1.80 13.3 2.10 1.80 2.5 1.60 Total Suspended 5 mg/l - 22.3 8.10 4.70 15.6 4.50 3.00 5.6 3.00 Solids Electrical 6 µmhos/cm - 1850 1960 1530 368 752 137 345 127 Conductivity@25◦C Total Dissolved 7 mg/l 500 1208 1335 933 213 462 234.0 221 216 Solids Total Alkalinity as 8 mg/l 200 375 448 347 50.8 61.8 52.0 44.5 48.0 CaCO3 Total Hardness as 9 mg/l 200 799 891 583 90 173 110 112 104 CaCO3 10 Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 145 172 152 22.0 40.2 31.7 28.7 26.9 11 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 106 112 49.3 8.45 17.5 7.45 12.4 8.90 12 Sodium as Na mg/l - 71.7 76.5 48.1 15.6 88.3 31.70 55.7 26.8 13 Potassium as K mg/l - 19.2 15.3 14.8 7.60 8.60 5.64 11.2 6.66 14 Chloride as Cl mg/l 250 327 317 166 45.2 188 51.6 187 39.7

15 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 200 56.0 49.7 45.1 28.2 23.5 32.6 35.6 27.30 16 Carbonate mg/l ------17 Bicarbonate mg/l - 458 546 423 62.0 75.4 77.5 65.1 62.8

Page 105 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

18 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 45 5.41 2.47 6.85 6.75 6.42 3.46 3.20 5.74 BDL 19 Fluoride as F mg/l 1 0.52 0.20 0.64 0.34 0.23 0.43 1.17 (DL 0.5) 20 Sulphides mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1)

21 % Sodium % - 15.9 15.5 14.6 25.4 51.1 37.1 46.94 34.2 Residual Sodium 22 - - 2.9 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.1 Carbonate (RSC) 1.5 23 Oil & Grease mg/l - BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 24 Arsenic mg/l 0.01 (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 25 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 26 Cadmium mg/l 0.003 (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01)

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 27 Chromium mg/l 0.05 (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05)

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 28 Copper mg/l 0.05 0.045 0.032 0.045 (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01)

29 Iron mg/l 0.3 0.03 0.16 0.09 0.24 0.22 0.56 6.13 0.89

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 30 Lead mg/l 0.01 (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1)

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 32 Manganese mg/l 0.1 (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05)

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 33 Mercury mg/l 0.001 (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001)

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 34 Nickel mg/l 0.02 (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05)

Page 106 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 35 Selenium mg/l 0.01 (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005)

36 Zinc mg/l 5 2.62 0.68 1.34 0.65 1.55 0.011 0.51 0.04

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 37 Phosphate mg/l - 0.76 1.25 0.17 (DL0.02) (DL0.02) (DL0.02) (DL0.02) (DL0.02)

38 Dissolved Oxygen mg/l - 3.40 4.40 5.10 3.70 5.90 5.12 4.2 5.60 39 COD mg/l - 18.6 8.40 6.90 20.3 7.20 8.60 7.3 8.9 40 BOD, 3 Days @27°C mg/l - 12.8 4.20 3.60 13.4 3.10 4.10 3.5 3.20

Page 107 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.9.1.2 Results and Discussions

Summary of analytical results

 In the surface water the pH varies between 7.12-7.63, which are meeting the IS 10500:2012 for Drinking Water.  The Total Dissolved Solids range varies between 213 mg/l – 1335 mg/l for the surface water. The TDS value of few samples exceed the acceptable limit of IS 10500:2012  The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000 mg/l. The chloride content in the surface water for study area is ranges between 39.7 mg/l – 327 mg/l.  The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is 400mg/l. The sulphate content of the surface water of the study area varies between 23.5 mg/l – 56.0 mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.  The Total hardness ranges is between 90 mg/l - 891 mg/l, for few samples acceptable limit of IS 10500: 2012 exceeds. 3.9.2 Ground water resources

Ground Water Department is monitoring the changes in groundwater regime continuously through a network of Piezometer wells fitted with Automatic water level recorders in different hydro geological and geomorphic units. Ground water level behaviour is analysed based on monitoring of ground water level from the network hydrograph stations (NHS) established by CGWB.

Groundwater resource of the district has been assessed keeping in view, the sustainable and optimum development of the resource. The estimation has been done based Ground Water Estimation methodology (GEM)-1997.Assessment is done taking into consideration of various hydrologic units viz. Command, non command hilly area with more than 20% slope and poor quality area.

The groundwater potential of the gross geographical area of the basin is estimated on pro- rata basis from the district-wise groundwater resources-2012 published by the Central Groundwater Board (CGWB) as given in Table 3-24. Ground water level fluctuation decadal means (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka is given in Figure 3-30.

Table 3-24: Groundwater Potential in Bengaluru Urban PIA District

Page 108 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Attribute Potential /Quantity Area of the district 2190 Sq.Km Net Annual groundwater availability of the district 11723 ha-m Total groundwater draft for irrigation, domestic and industrial uses 3794 ha-m Existing gross ground water draft for all uses 16703 ha-m Draft Exceeding the total available ground water resources leaving Nil Balance Available for Exploitation Nil

Figure 3-30 Ground water level fluctuation decadal mean (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka

3.9.2.1 Ground water Quality

Total Eight (08) ground water monitoring locations were identified for assessment in different villages around the project site based on the usage of sub surface water by the settlements/ villages in the study area. The groundwater results are compared with the desirable and permissible water quality standards as per IS: 10500 (2012) for drinking water. Groundwater

Page 109 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report quality monitoring locations and results are given in Table 3-25 and Table 3-26. A map showing the monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-35.

Table 3-25: Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations

Distance (km) from Azimuth Station Code Location Project boundary Directions GW1 Near Project Site 2.60 - GW2 Jigani 1.0 WNW GW3 Doddathoguru 6.9 N GW4 Bommasandra 5.8 ENE GW5 Ramakrishnapura 4.7 E GW6 Byagadadenahalli 6.6 SE GW7 Indalavadi 5.8 SSW GW8 Hullahalli 5.5 NE

Page 110 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-26: Ground Water Monitoring Results

DW Standards (IS S.No Parameters UNIT 10500:2012) GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW-5 GW-6 GW-7 GW-8 Acceptable Limit 1. Source - Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Colour Hazen BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2. 5 (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) pH - 3. 6.5 to 8.5 7.33 7.64 7.55 7.93 7.82 8.21 7.43 7.8 Turbidity NTU BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4. 1 (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) Total Suspended mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 5. - Soilds (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) Electrical 6. - 978 1365 2140 1277 690 894 1095 623 Conductivity 25◦C µmhos/cm Total Dissolved 7. 500 670 910 1280 795 462 584 690 390 Solids mg/l Total Alkalinity as 8. 200 187 205 368 237 144 173 188 119 CaCO3 mg/l Total Hardness as 9. 200 326 401 662 432 182 251 329 140 CaCO3 mg/l 10. Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 48.6 97.0 140.4 92.8 47.7 55.0 76.6 28.1 11. Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 37.5 38.5 75.5 48.6 15.3 27.6 33.4 16.9 12. - 51.4 102 146 92.6 49.5 58.2 84.4 37.1 Sodium as Na mg/l 13. - 17.4 36.9 35.2 19.0 15.0 20.4 22.4 13.4 Potassium as k mg/l

14. 250 121 186 250 163 74.8 99.2 143 48.6 Chlorides as Cl- mg/l

15. 200 77.2 112 123 83.5 32.2 42.4 60.8 33.3 Sulphate (SO4) mg/l

Page 111 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

16. ------Carbonate mg/l

17. - 189 250 449 289 176 211 229 146 Bicarbonate mg/l 18. 45 28.7 34.3 17.8 29.5 11.1 9.52 25.4 9.28 Nitrates(NO3) mg/l BDL 19. 1 0.18 0.33 0.67 0.13 0.50 0.25 0.19 Fluoride as F- mg/l (DL 0.05)

20. Sulphides 0.05 BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) mg/l

21. % Sodium - 27.3 33.1 31.0 30.6 34.9 31.4 33.9 34.0 %

22. Sodium Absorbtion - 1.35 2.2 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.5 2.0 1.4 ratio (SAR) 23. Oil & Grease mg/l - BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 24. Arsenic 0.01 mg/l (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 25. Cyanide 0.05 mg/l (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 26. Cadmium 0.003 mg/l (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 27. Chromium 0.05 mg/l (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) BDL BDL BDL BDL 28. Copper 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 mg/l (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) (DL0.01) 29. Iron mg/l 0.3 0.37 0.11 0.34 0.14 0.46 0.12 0.23 0.21 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 30. Lead 0.01 mg/l (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) (DL0.1) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 31. Manganese 0.1 mg/l (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 32. Mercury 0.001 mg/l DL0.001) DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) (DL0.001) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 33. Nickel 0.02 mg/l (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) (DL0.05) Page 112 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 34. Selenium 0.01 mg/l (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) (DL0.005) 35. Zinc mg/l 5 1.42 2.97 0.43 0.13 1.73 2.87 0.28 0.15 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 36. Phosphate - mg/l (DL 0.02) (DL 0.02) (DL 0.02) (DL 0.02) (DL 0.02) (DL 0.02) (DL 0.02) (DL 0.02) 37. Dissolved Oxygen mg/l - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 38. BOD 3days @27°C - mg/l (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) (DL 1.0) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 39. COD - mg/l (DL 4.0) (DL 4.0) (DL 4.0) (DL 4.0) (DL 4.0) (DL 4.0) (DL 4.0) (DL 4.0)

Page 113 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.9.2.2 Results and Discussions

A summary of analytical results are presented below:

 The ground water results of the study area indicate that the average pH ranges is varied between 7.33-8.21  The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 390-1280mg/l for the ground water and its meets the permissible limits of IS 10500: 2012  The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000 mg/l. The chloride content in the ground water for study area is ranges between 48.6mg/l – 250mg/l.  The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is 400mg/l. the sulphate content of the ground water of the study area is varied between 32.2 mg/l – 123 mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.  The Total hardness ranges is between 140-662 mg/l for ground water its meeting the permissible limit of the IS 10500: 2012.

3.10 Soil as a resource and its Quality

The predominant soils in the PIA district are red loamy and sandy soil and laterite soil. Laterite soil is mostly red in color and yellow loamy, pale to bright red colours are also seen. Laterite soil is suitable for Paddy, Sugarcane, Areca nut and Plantation crops, viz.crops like Cardamom & Plantains. Loamy red soils are distributed in the lower reaches of valleys. Red lateritic soil is the most dominant soil type in the area. The texture of the soil varies from fine to coarse. The soil in valleys and intermediate slopes is rich in loam whereas in upper slopes it is much coarse in nature. The soil responds well to irrigation and other soil-managment practices. Silty and Loamy soils are of transported origin and are found mostly along river banks and in valley plains. They have good infiltration capacity and are well suited for agriculture due to their fertility.

3.10.1 Soil quality

In order to assess the quality of soil at different locations in the study area, various land use categories were taken into account. Soil sampling was carried out at Eight (08) locations in the study area. Soil analysis was carried as per IS: 2720 methods. Soil quality monitoring locations & results are given in Table 3-27 & Table 3-28. Map showing the monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-36.

Table 3-27: Soil Quality Monitoring Locations

Page 114 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Distance (Km) Direction Location Code Location w.r.t project site w.r.t. project site S1 Project Site - -

S2 Jigani 1.0 WNW

S3 Doddathoguru 6.9 N

S4 Bommasandra 5.8 ENE

S5 Ramakrishnapura 4.7 E

S6 Byagadadenahalli 6.6 SE

S7 Indalavadi 5.8 SSW

S8 Hullahalli 5.5 NE

Page 115

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-28: Soil Quality Monitoring Results

S.No Parameters Units S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8

Brown Light Reddish 1 Colour - Reddish Brown Dark Brown Light Brown Brown Brown Reddish Brown Brown Brown Sandy Clay Sandy Clay Sandy Clay Sandy Clay Sandy Clay 2 Soil Texture - Sandy Loam Sandy Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam Loam 3 Sand % 53.0 65.0 72.0 72.0 67.0 63.0 66.0 46.0 4 Silt % 27.0 7.00 16.0 18.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 29.0 5 Clay % 20.0 28.0 12.0 10.0 21.0 25.0 27.0 25.0 6 pH - 7.32 7.35 5.26 6.80 7.56 7.74 7.53 8.66 Electrical 7 µmhos/cm 241 46.0 19.0 51.0 72.0 598 48.0 719 Conductivity 8 Infiltration Rate cm/hr 1.18 1.10 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.16 1.14 1.18 9 Bulk Density gm/cc 1.13 1.38 1.27 1.28 1.27 1.28 1.28 1.15 Cation Exchange meq/100 10 16.5 19.9 11.9 8.90 15.9 16.9 17.9 21.3 Capacity gm 11 Moisture content % 14.02 10.46 9.81 9.92 5.95 13.09 11.6 4.92 Water Holding 12 % 39.0 26.0 24.0 25.0 30.0 28.0 27.0 22.0 Capacity 13 Organic Carbon % 0.632 0.59 0.94 0.51 0.54 0.60 0.56 0.87 14 Organic matter % 1.09 1.02 1.62 0.88 0.94 1.03 0.96 1.50 15 Nitrogen as N kg/ha 275 396 72 252 432 288 108 540 16 Phosphorus kg/ha 197 252 36 144 252 144 72 432 17 Potassium kg/ha 189 194.4 86.4 172.8 237.6 194.4 86.4 324 18 Calcium % 0.006 0.008 0.004 0.012 0.008 0.044 0.012 0.012 19 Magnesium % 0.032 0.017 0.014 0.031 0.014 0.010 0.068 0.020 20 Boron mg/kg 1.22 0.98 0.95 0.89 1.14 1.02 1.08 1.14

Page 117 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 21 Cadmium mg/kg BDL( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) 22 Chromium mg/kg 0.04 0.02 0.021 0.028 0.03 0.05 0.011 0.025 23 Copper mg/kg 11.3 8.54 11.6 10.4 7.39 11.8 21.6 6.7 24 Iron mg/kg 28.7 13.34 64.1 14.3 24.8 23.16 16.38 31.6 BDL BDL BDL 25 Lead mg/kg BDL( DL 0.1) 2.1 2.87 3.78 1.62 ( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) ( DL 0.1) 26 Manganese mg/kg 3.20 4.5 1.1 2.4 6.2 1.14 5.6 0.98 27 Zinc mg/kg 13.4 12.7 20.01 21.8 11.6 13.7 15.7 10.6

3.10.2 Results and Discussions

Summary of analytical results

 The pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66 indicating that the soils are almost neutral in nature.  Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 19-719 μS/cm. As the EC value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in nature  The water holding capacity of the soil samples varied from 22-39 (%).  Nitrogen content ranged from 72 kg/ha to 540 kg/ha  Phosphorous ranged from 36 to 432 kg/ha  Potassium content ranges from 86 to 324 kg/ha

Page 118 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.11 Flora & Fauna

The study of terrestrial ecology within the study area of 10 Km radius has been carried out through field investigation and satellite imagery data as discussed earlier

Bannerghatta National Park, near Bangalore, Karnataka, was founded within the 10 km study area. The 65,127.5 acre (260.51 km2) national park is located about 22 km south of Bangalore in the hills of the Anekal range with an elevation of 1245 - 1634m. The park has a hilly terrain of granite sheets under moist deciduous forest valleys and scrubland on higher areas. Sixteen villages border the park. The park is part of a wildlife corridor for elephants which connects the BR Hills and the Sathyamangalam forest. The park is contiguous with Talli reserve forest in the southeast and Bilikal forest in the south. It is a popular tourist destination with a zoo, a pet corner, an animal rescue centre, a butterfly enclosure, a snake house and a safari park. One hundred and one species of birds have been recorded in the park.

A study reported 48 species of butterflies in various seasons at Bannerghatta Biological Park. Thirty species of butterflies belong to five families viz., Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nympalidae, Lycaenide and Hespiridae were breeding in different seasons under captive conditions and released into the conservatory dome.The area can be classified into the following ecological zone.

3.11.1 Flora

The field investigation and satellite imagery data show, that the study area is a mixture of agricultural, wasteland and get irrigated by the tanks and tube wells. The Evergreen is observed within the study area. The experimental finding of the pre monsoon season shows the dominance of Scrubs like Anogeisses latifoila followed by Chloroxylon Swieritenia, Aacia leucophloeatrees like Termila spp, Pterocarpus marusupium, Dalbergia latifolia, Serata, Dendroca lamus Strictus within the study area. List of of flora reported/observed in the study area is given in Table 3-29 and list of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park is given in Table 3-30.

Table 3-29: List of Flora Reported/Observed in the Study Area

S.No Botanical Name Family Name Vernacular Name

1. Acacia Catechus Fabaceae Karungali 2. Acacia leucophloea Mimosaceae Bellada, bili-jali 3. Anogeisses latifoila Combretaceae Dinduga 4. Chloroxylon Swieritenia Rutaceae Kloroksilan Svaiteniya 5. Dalbergia latifolia Fabaceae Black rosewood,Blackwoodtree,Bombay

Page 119 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

blackwood,East Indian reosewood, Indian blackwood 6. Lagerstroemia speciosa Lythraceae Holenandi 7. Plantago lanceolata Plantaginaceae Esabakolu, Esabgolu 8. Pterocarpus Fabaceae Banga, Bange mara. Bengali 9. Pterocarpus marusupium Fabaceae Malabarkino, Indiankino tree,vijayasar 10. Shorea Talura Dipterocarpaceae aragina mara, bile bovu

Table 3-30: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park

S.No Botanical Name Family Name Common Name 1. Acacia Catechus Fabaceae Karungali 2. Azadirachta indica Meliaceae Neem 3. Bambusoideae Poaceae Bamboo 4. Bauhinia purpurea Caesalpiniaceae Purple orchid tree,Purple Butterfly Tree, 5. Dendrocalamus Strictus Poaceae Bidiru, Kirubidiru,Konkani 6. Eucalyptus Myrtaceae Blue gum tree 7. Grewia tilaefolia Tiliaceae Dhaman 8. Narcissus latifolia Amaryllidaceae Daffodil, daffadowndilly, narcissus, jonquil 9. Peltphorum pterocarpum Fabaceae Yellow Flame, Copper Pod, Batai Laut 10. Samanea saman Fabaceae Cow tamarind 11. Santalum album Santalaceae white or East Indian sandalwood 12. Schleichera oleosa Sapindaceae Malay Lac Tree 13. T. arjuna Combretaceae White Marudah 14. Tamarindus indica Fabaceae Tamarind 15. Tectona Grandia Lamiaceae Saguvani 16. Terminalai Spp Combretaceae Belli būdu marada 17. Terminalia tomentosa Combretaceae Asan, Indian Laurel, Silver grey wood 18. Terocarpus santalinus Fabaceae Agslue,Rakta Chandana& Honne

3.11.1.1 Aquatic Vegetation

Aquatic plants are found in the littoral zone, which are ideal habitats for fish and migratory birds. The status of aquatic vegetation in various wetlands has been mapped, on the basis of which it is broadly divided into completely vegetated (CV), partially vegetated (PV), vegetation on fringes (VF) and no vegetation (NV). Of the total 682 wetlands, 517 do not support any vegetation, of these 417 are tanks. There are 83 tanks partially vegetated, 54 with vegetation on fringes and 7 are completely vegetated.

3.11.1.2 Planktons

Phytoplanktons surveyed are considered under five major groups:

S.NO Planktons Name 1 Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms): 2 Chlorophyceae: 3 Desmidiaciae (Desmids): 4 Dinophyceae:

Page 120 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

5 Myxophyceae: 6 Ostracoda:

3.11.2 Fauna

Domestic – The domestic animals are mainly mammals like cow, goat, cat, dog etc are found common in the study area.

Wild Animals – Since the natural forests constitute negligible of the forest area and since they are in isolated pockets, the wild life does not offer a wide spectrum of species. Wild animals are seen in Bannerghatta National Park with native and non native species. Other than these, some reptiles and amphibians can also be seen with a number of bird species.

List of of fauna reported/observed in the study area is given in Table 3-31 and list of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park is given in Table 3-32.

Table 3-31: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in the Study Area

Sl.No Scientific Name Family Name Common Name

Reptiles & Amphibians

1. Bufom lanostictus Bufonidae Toad

2. Calotes versicolor Agamidaa Garden lizard

3. Chameleo zeylanicus Chamaeleonidae Chamelton

4. Gecko sp. Eublepharidae Small wall lizard

5. Rana cyanophlyctis Dicroglossidae Frog

6. Rana tigrina Dicroglossidae. Frog

Rodents

7. Bandicota indica Muridae Badicoot

8. Musmusculus Muridae Mouse

9. Rattusrattus Muridae Rat

10. Ratufaindica Sciuridae Squirrel

Table 3-32: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park

Sl.No Family Name Scientific Name Common Name

Page 121 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Reptiles & Amphibians Batagur baska Geoemydidae BatagarTerrapin,River Terrapin 1.

2. Calman latrirostirs Alligatoridae Calman Crocodylus moreletil Morelet’s Crocodile 3. Eryx johnii Russell Red Sand Boa Snakes 4. Boidae Gavialis gangeticus Gavialidae Gharial 5. Geochelone elegans Testudinidae Indian Starred Tortise 6. Geoclemys hamiltonii Geoemydidae Black Spotted Terrapins 7. Iguana Iguana Iguanidae Green iguana 8. Lissemys Punctata Trionychidae Indian mud or Flapshell Turtle 9. Naja naja Elapidae Indian Cobra 10. Ophiophagus hannah Elapidae King Cobra 11. Ptyas musosa Colubridae Rat Snake 12. Python molurus Indian Rock python 13. Pythonidae Trachemysscripta elegans Emydidae Red-eared Slider Turtles 14. Varanus bengalensis Varanidae Common Indian Monintor Lizard 15. Vipera russelli Viperidae Russells Viper 16. Mammales

Axis axis Cervidae Chital or Spotted Deer 17. Axis porcinus Animalia Hog Deer 18. Boselaphus tragocamelus Bovidae Nilgal or Blue Bull 19. Callithrix jacchus Callitrichidae Marmoset 20. Elephas maximus indicus Elephantidae Elephant Indian 21. Equus quagga Equidae Zebra 22. Erethizon dorsatum Erethizontidae Porcupine 23.

Page 122 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Hippopotamus amphibius Hippopotamuses Hippopotamus 24. Hyaena hyaena Hyaenidae Striped Hyena 25. Melursus ursinus Ursidae Sloth Bear 26. Muntiacus Cervidae Barking Deer 27. Panthera leo Felidae Lion Hybrid 28. Panthera tigris sumatrae Felidae Surnatran Tiger 29. Panthera tigris tigris Felidae Royal Bengal Tiger 30.

3.11.2.1 Birds

Wetland and water birds make use of a variety of conditions, from dry zones and meadows bordering lakes to open water zones. On the basis of their size, the availability of food and suitable foraging conditions, different birds can occupy different parts of the lake. In Bengaluru there are five major groups of water birds found based on the wetland zones they frequent, Open water birds ,Waders and shoreline birds, Waders and shoreline birds, Birds of reed bed and Birds of open air space above wetlands List of of birds reported/observed is given in Table 3-33

Table 3-33: List of Birds Reported/Observed

Sl.No Scientific Name Family Name Common Name

Birds Reported/Observed in the Study Area

1. Athene brama Strigidae Spotted owlet

2. Milvus migrans Accipitridae Pariya kite

3. Perdix perdix Phasianidae Patridge

Birds Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park Ploceus philippinus Ploceidae Baya Weaver 4. Melopsittacus undulatus Psittacidae Budgeriger 5. Nymphicus hollandicus Cacatuidae Cockatiels 6. Black-crowned night heron Ardeidae Heron Night 7. Eudocimus albus Threskiornithidae Ibis White 8.

Page 123 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Agapornis Psittaculidae Love Birds 9. Lonchura atricapilla Estrildidae Munia Black Headed 10. Tyto alba Tytonidae Barn Owl 11. Bubo bubo Strigidae Eurasian Eagle Owl 12. Psittacula eupatria Psittaculidae Parakeet alexandrine 13. Psittacula krameri Psittaculidae Rose Ring parakeet 14. Pelecanus philippensis Pelecanidae Grey Pelican 15. Netta rufina Anatidae Red Crested Pochard 16. Mycteria leucocephala Ciconiidae Painted Stork 17. Chrysolophus pictus Phasianidae Yellow Golden Pheasant 18. Dromaius novaehollandiae Dromaiidae Emu 19. pavo cristatus Phasianidae White Peafowl 20. Chrysolophus amherstiae Phasianidae Lady Amherst’s Pheasant 21. Struthio camelus Struthionidae Ostrich 22. Phasianus colchicus Phasianidae Chinesering necked Pheasant 23. Cygnus atratus Anatidae Black swan 24. Lophura nycthemera Phasianidae Silver Pheasant 25. Ara chloropterus Psittacidae Green Winged Macaws 26. Rhea americana Rheidae Rhea 27. Amazona Psittacidae Amazon Parakeet 28. Psittacus erithacus Psittacidae African Grey Parrot 29. Aratinga solstitialis Psittacidae Sun Conure Parrot 30. Balearica pavonina Gruidae Black Crowned Crane 31. Ara ararauna Psittacidae Blue Gold Macaws 32. Probosciger aterrimus Gruidae Palm Cockatoo 33. Eclectus roratus Psittacidae Eclectus Parrot 34.

Page 124 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Cacatua galerita Cacatuidae Sulphur Crested Cockatoo 35. Ara macao Psittacidae Scarlet Macaw 36. Eolophus roseicapilla Cacatuinae Galah Parrot 37. Strix ocellata Strigidae Mottled wood owl 38. Trichoglossus moluccanus Psittaculidae Rainbow Lorikeet 39. Eos bornea Psittaculidae Red Lorikeet 40. Goura Columbidae Crowned Pegions 41. Psittacula columboides Psittacidae Blue Winged Parakeet 42. Buceros bicornis Bucerotidae Great Indian Horn Bill 43. Pavo cristatus Phasianidae Indian Peafowl 44. Plataleinae Threskiornithidae Spoon Bill 45. Lophura leucomelanos Phasianidae Kalij Pheasant 46. Gallus gallus Phasianidae Red Jungle Fowl 47.

3.12 Socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area

Bangalore district is located in the sour eastern corner of Karnataka State. It has a geographical area of 2196 sq.km. The district is land locked and shares its borders with Bengaluru Rural district on the north and the east, and with the state of Tamil Nadu in the south. The population of the district is 96,21,551. Of the total population,50,22,661 are males and 45,98,890 are females as per 2011 Census. The district’s share of total Karnataka’s population is 15.75 percent. 3.12.1 Socio economic Profile of the district

The district is unique in nature as more urbanized with rural population. The district is the highest contributor to the State Economy with 33.3% contribution to GDDP (2012-13). The per capita annual income in the district is INR 2,02,340 (2012-13). The tertiary sector contributing 39.5% and secondary sector is contributing 36% and primary sector is contributing 2.3% to GDP.

In rural areas Agriculture is main activities and Paddy, Ragi, Maize, oil seeds, Horticulture crops are main crops of the district. The area has good infrastructure facilities for transportation and storage and marketing of their agricultural products. District social indicators are given in Table 3-34.

Page 125 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-34: Bengaluru Urban District Social Indicators

S.No Social Indicators Value 1 Decadal variation 47.18% 2 Urban population 90.94% 3 Sex ratio 916 4 Sex ratio for 0-6 age group 944 5 Population density (per square Km) 4358 6 Scheduled caste population 22.93% 7 Scheduled tribe population 3.26% 8 Literacy rate 87.67% 9 Work Participation rate 44.14% 10 Main Workers 40.10% 11 Marginal Workers 4.04% 12 Maternal maternity rate (per 100000 live births) 45 (2011-12) 13 Infant Mortality rate (the number of deaths of children less than one 3 (2011-12) year of age per 1000 live births. Source: Census 2011 & Economic Survey 2015-16

3.12.2 Socio economic Profile of the study area

The project is located in KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani link road, Anekal taluk of Bangalore Urban District. The 10 Km radius covers almost a major portion of Anekal taluk and some portion of Bangalore Corporation.

Exhibit 1: Govt. Primary School at Rajapura Exhibit 2: Interaction with people, at Rajapura

Page 126 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Exhibit 3: Interaction with public at Exhibit 4: Socio economic survey at Ramakrishnapura Bommasandra

Exhibit 5: With a shop owner at Hullahalli Exhibit 6: Primary Agri. Credit Coop Society, Bukkasagara

Figure 3-31 Informal Consultation with Locals

Table 3-35: Socioeconomic details of the study area

Name of Villages Number of Household Total Population Male Female Within 5 Km radius Banahalli 1673 5819 3164 2655 Bande Nalla Sandra 426 1348 836 512 Bommasandra 4334 15254 8826 6428 Dyavasandra 129 564 297 267 Gollahalli 2160 7433 4631 2802 Haragadde 2010 7735 4839 2896

Page 127 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Harapanahalli 817 3040 1670 1370 Hebbagodi 9623 34827 20771 14056 Hennagara 658 2801 1453 1348 Hinnakki 311 1384 695 689 Hosahalli 191 875 456 419 Hulimangala 643 2787 1479 1308 Jigani 4437 17036 9990 7046 Kachanaikanahalli 1468 5606 2961 2645 Kittaganahalli 2064 7280 3983 3297 Konasandra 151 684 354 330 Koppa 337 1474 753 721 Koppa Gate 369 1415 721 694 Kumbaranahalli 179 725 374 351 Kyalasanahalli 547 1892 1039 853 Lingapura 174 895 444 451 Mada Patna 1092 4076 2569 1507 Mahanthalingapura 622 2751 1429 1322 Maragondahalli 2145 8824 4943 3881 Masthena Halli 368 1506 775 731 Nanjapura 103 405 194 211 Nosenur 264 1165 620 545 Nosenur Gollahalli 110 515 278 237 Rajapura 200 912 473 439 Ramakrishnapura 73 339 178 161 S.Bingipura 463 1851 981 870 Seethanaikana Halli 82 337 169 168 Thirupalya 4251 14762 9433 5329 Vaddara Palya 1231 4686 2835 1851 Vaderamanchanahalli 778 2599 1735 864 Veerasandra 2595 9190 5397 3793 Yarandahalli 1472 5732 3465 2267 Total 48550 180524 105210 75314 Within 5 Km to 10 Km A Medihalli 105 451 236 215 Adigondanahalli 324 1354 676 678 Adur 150 717 368 349 Agasa Thimmanahalli 5 22 14 8 Ali Bommasandra 162 700 355 345 Amani Doddakere 8 32 18 14 Andapura 524 1769 951 818 Anekal 10322 44260 22539 21721 Aravantigepura 54 247 138 109 Avadadenahalli 148 680 339 341 Avalahalli 106 551 291 260 Bagganadoddi 93 386 203 183

Page 128 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Balagaranahalli 1464 5447 3358 2089 Bandapura 207 853 421 432 Bannerughatta 2092 8054 4160 3894 Begihalli 364 1412 731 681 Bendiganahalli 183 658 342 316 Bhovi Palya 1195 4379 2489 1890 Bommandahalli 191 798 404 394 Bukkasagara 435 1748 897 851 Byagadadenahalli 272 1435 1004 431 Byrappanahalli 121 486 252 234 Chandapura 1240 4562 2461 2101 Chandrapura -Chatrakane 1695 5934 3031 2903 Chikka Hosahalli 280 1367 697 670 Chikkanahalli 64 293 154 139 Gollahalli 34 137 72 65 Gowrenahalli 450 2226 1123 1103 Guddahatti 380 1635 801 834 Gulimangala 194 849 446 403 Halesampigehalli 249 928 468 460 Harapanahalli 817 3040 1670 1370 Hasaruvani 4 17 10 7 Honnakalasapura 105 494 253 241 Huskur 612 2598 1317 1281 Iggalur 1272 4702 2454 2248 Indlawadi 439 1933 1000 933 Itchangur 365 1347 832 515 J.Bingipura 17 75 39 36 Jangal Palya 141 520 247 273 Kadajakkanahalli 125 566 293 273 Kaggalipura 60 232 126 106 Kalbalu 554 1979 1230 749 Kalkere 770 2793 1761 1032 Kammasandra Agrahara 153 664 316 348 Karpur 327 2026 1047 979 Kempavaderahalli 62 287 144 143 Krishnasagara 141 594 324 270 Laxmi Sagara 216 1007 512 495 Madivala 634 2792 1399 1393 Mantapa 343 1438 717 721 Marasur 770 3034 1641 1393 Marasur Agrahara 30 136 63 73 Muthanallur 398 1663 822 841 Muthanallur Amanikere 66 239 115 124 Nallasandra 183 803 427 376 Neralur 1500 5608 3217 2391

Page 129 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Ragihalli 402 1655 852 803 Ramasagara 520 2199 1087 1112 Sakalawara 204 827 424 403 Sidihosakote 331 1591 830 761 Sonnanayakanapura 277 1240 615 625 Soppahalli 117 489 258 231 Sriramapura 284 1162 595 567 Suragajakkanahalli 308 1311 729 582 Thattanahalli 220 923 490 433 Thimmasandra 41 194 97 97 Thirumagondanahalli 567 2107 1095 1012 Vaderahalli 19 57 35 22 BBMP part 21322 80037 42157 37880 Total 57827 228749 120679 108070 Source: Census 2011

The percentage of male Child population (50.89%) is equal to female child population (49.11%). Child population details within the study area are given in Table 3-36.

Table 3-36: Child population within the study area

Child Population (0- Male Female Village Name 6 age) (<6 age) (<6 age) Within 5 Km Banahalli 669 329 340 Bande Nalla Sandra 111 52 59 Bommasandra 1722 881 841 Dyavasandra 57 33 24 Gollahalli 671 356 315 Haragadde 772 395 377 Harapanahalli 398 216 182 Hebbagodi 3850 1904 1946 Hennagara 367 190 177 Hinnakki 171 80 91 Hosahalli 115 52 63 Hulimangala 320 163 157 Jigani 2101 1114 987 Kachanaikanahalli 637 332 305 Kittaganahalli 815 439 376 Konasandra 83 42 41 Koppa 201 107 94 Koppa Gate 230 116 114 Kumbaranahalli 85 42 43 Kyalasanahalli 191 100 91 Lingapura 110 52 58 Mada Patna 467 232 235

Page 130 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Mahanthalingapura 376 196 180 Maragondahalli 1294 648 646 Masthena Halli 169 91 78 Nanjapura 45 20 25 Nosenur 127 62 65 Nosenur Gollahalli 46 28 18 Rajapura 105 53 52 Ramakrishnapura 63 34 29 S.Bingipura 242 107 135 Seethanaikana Halli 39 19 20 Thirupalya 1251 646 605 Vaddara Palya 597 292 305 Vaderamanchanahalli 253 144 109 Veerasandra 1029 532 497 Yarandahalli 733 386 347 Total 20512 10485 10027 Within 5 Km to 10 Km A Medihalli 39 19 20 Adigondanahalli 133 67 66 Adur 77 31 46 Agasa Thimmanahalli 3 2 1 Ali Bommasandra 78 41 37 Amani Doddakere 3 2 1 Andapura 262 134 128 Anekal 4803 2477 2326 Aravantigepura 16 8 8 Avadadenahalli 81 37 44 Avalahalli 58 29 29 Bagganadoddi 55 30 25 Balagaranahalli 583 270 313 Bandapura 82 45 37 Bannerughatta 992 469 523 Begihalli 154 75 79 Bendiganahalli 92 46 46 Bhovi Palya 496 257 239 Bommandahalli 111 64 47 Bukkasagara 224 114 110 Byagadadenahalli 95 63 32 Byrappanahalli 61 27 34 Chandapura 584 290 294 Chandrapura -Chatrakane 700 335 365 Chikka Hosahalli 158 74 84 Chikkanahalli 23 15 8 Gollahalli 15 7 8 Gowrenahalli 392 193 199

Page 131 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Guddahatti 184 88 96 Gulimangala 92 48 44 Halesampigehalli 120 55 65 Harapanahalli 398 216 182 Hasaruvani 4 3 1 Honnakalasapura 55 23 32 Huskur 281 138 143 Iggalur 530 270 260 Indlawadi 223 120 103 Itchangur 161 78 83 J.Bingipura 6 2 4 Jangal Palya 31 14 17 Kadajakkanahalli 69 34 35 Kaggalipura 19 13 6 Kalbalu 217 103 114 Kalkere 281 151 130 Kammasandra Agrahara 108 48 60 Karpur 119 68 51 Kempavaderahalli 34 15 19 Krishnasagara 29 19 10 Laxmi Sagara 146 74 72 Madivala 318 164 154 Mantapa 182 96 86 Marasur 344 173 171 Marasur Agrahara 12 7 5 Muthanallur 136 66 70 Muthanallur Amanikere 21 8 13 Nallasandra 87 53 34 Neralur 694 325 369 Ragihalli 190 89 101 Ramasagara 240 126 114 Sakalawara 84 35 49 Sidihosakote 164 89 75 Sonnanayakanapura 183 86 97 Soppahalli 62 31 31 Sriramapura 189 99 90 Suragajakkanahalli 153 81 72 Thattanahalli 70 34 36 Thimmasandra 19 7 12 Thirumagondanahalli 247 126 121 Vaderahalli 2 0 2 BBMP part 10334 5306 5028 Total 27208 13802 13406 Source: Census 2011

Page 132 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

The majority of the population in the project area belongs to General Category (81.03%). The scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population are 16.41% (22.93% of the district) and 2.55% (3.26% of the district). Social group details within the study area are given in Table 3-37. Table 3-37: Social group details within the study area

Scheduled Village Name General Scheduled Tribe caste With 5 Km Banahalli 5104 558 157 Bande Nalla Sandra 987 355 6 Bommasandra 13468 1512 274 Dyavasandra 188 373 3 Gollahalli 6561 552 320 Haragadde 5790 1846 99 Harapanahalli 2454 445 141 Hebbagodi 29799 4134 894 Hennagara 1995 753 53 Hinnakki 915 377 92 Hosahalli 443 411 21 Hulimangala 1669 1065 53 Jigani 14036 2480 520 Kachanaikanahalli 4941 542 123 Kittaganahalli 6211 868 201 Konasandra 477 200 7 Koppa 883 579 12 Koppa Gate 599 721 95 Kumbaranahalli 596 129 0 Kyalasanahalli 1288 580 24 Lingapura 392 154 349 Mada Patna 3526 437 113 Mahanthalingapura 1020 1475 256 Maragondahalli 8196 494 134 Masthena Halli 1253 240 13 Nanjapura 219 180 6 Nosenur 760 405 0 Nosenur Gollahalli 387 19 109 Rajapura 583 319 10 Ramakrishnapura 132 182 25 S.Bingipura 1016 826 9 Seethanaikana Halli 251 61 25 Thirupalya 11639 2486 637 Vaddara Palya 2943 1666 77 Vaderamanchanahalli 2032 368 199

Page 133 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Veerasandra 7822 1028 340 Yarandahalli 4613 923 196 Total 145188 29743 5593 Witghin 5 Km to 10 Km A Medihalli 185 239 27 Adigondanahalli 988 363 3 Adur 340 377 0 Agasa Thimmanahalli 22 0 0 Ali Bommasandra 405 283 12 Amani Doddakere 32 0 0 Andapura 1704 20 45 Anekal 38903 4833 524 Aravantigepura 80 166 1 Avadadenahalli 320 310 50 Avalahalli 118 431 2 Bagganadoddi 163 179 44 Balagaranahalli 4837 489 121 Bandapura 461 392 0 Bannerughatta 6109 1835 110 Begihalli 884 467 61 Bendiganahalli 341 258 59 Bhovi Palya 3468 729 182 Bommandahalli 569 214 15 Bukkasagara 999 636 113 Byagadadenahalli 1013 353 69 Byrappanahalli 434 50 2 Chandapura 4000 502 60 Chandrapura -Chatrakane 5409 429 96 Chikka Hosahalli 955 403 9 Chikkanahalli 232 20 41 Gollahalli 132 5 0 Gowrenahalli 1922 304 0 Guddahatti 719 837 79 Gulimangala 543 278 28 Halesampigehalli 851 59 18 Harapanahalli 2454 445 141 Hasaruvani 17 0 0 Honnakalasapura 331 154 9 Huskur 1777 747 74 Iggalur 3715 900 87 Indlawadi 1504 345 84 Itchangur 1015 324 8 J.Bingipura 69 3 3 Jangal Palya 514 6 0 Kadajakkanahalli 375 95 96

Page 134 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Kaggalipura 155 23 54 Kalbalu 1304 551 124 Kalkere 2073 694 26 Kammasandra Agrahara 291 302 71 Karpur 1621 401 4 Kempavaderahalli 135 147 5 Krishnasagara 460 132 2 Laxmi Sagara 777 201 29 Madivala 1621 1144 27 Mantapa 739 686 13 Marasur 2206 791 37 Marasur Agrahara 121 15 0 Muthanallur 1086 549 28 Muthanallur Amanikere 234 1 4 Nallasandra 466 324 13 Neralur 4938 542 128 Ragihalli 929 485 241 Ramasagara 1394 765 40 Sakalawara 462 363 2 Sidihosakote 1004 579 8 Sonnanayakanapura 175 1065 0 Soppahalli 159 329 1 Sriramapura 797 308 57 Suragajakkanahalli 1021 284 6 Thattanahalli 519 393 11 Thimmasandra 10 0 184 Thirumagondanahalli 1426 598 83 Vaderahalli 36 21 0 BBMP part 71400 7262 1375 Total 186468 37435 4846

3.12.2.1 Employment and Livelihood

Economic vibrancy in a area is shown by the type and nature of the occupation available in the area. Of the total working population, the majority (91.46%) is the main workers i.e they have study job more than six months per annum. It is due to the industrialization in the area. The job opportunity is due to the development of Industrial and Service sectors. Only 10.28% of working population involved in the agriculture and allied occupation (primary). Workers group distribution in the study area is given in Table 3-38

Page 135

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-38: Workers group distribution in the study area

Agriculture Total Main Marginal Marginal Main Marginal Main Marginal Village Name Main Main Marginal Workers Workers Workers Agri Household Household Others Others Cultivators Agri.Labour Cultivators labors

Within 5 Km radius Banahalli 3032 2495 537 131 35 17 10 61 7 2268 503 Bande Nalla Sandra 809 773 36 105 81 8 6 5 3 582 19 Bommasandra 7993 7359 634 48 151 17 11 76 25 7084 581 Gollahalli 5151 4988 163 56 40 24 3 43 2 4849 134 Haragadde 4303 4215 88 180 143 8 4 27 1 3865 75 Harapanahalli 1441 1389 52 86 39 12 0 14 1 1250 39 Hebbagodi 20240 18863 1377 93 96 21 16 122 10 18552 1330 Hennagara 1319 1275 44 207 184 7 6 69 2 815 29 Hinnakki 514 224 290 24 14 8 29 9 80 177 173 Hosahalli 407 397 10 44 6 1 0 11 5 336 4 Hulimangala 1177 1139 38 74 53 7 6 13 1 999 24 Jigani (CT) 8557 7923 634 83 473 11 28 225 48 7142 547 Kachanaikanahalli 3646 2883 763 136 130 17 7 70 22 2547 717 Kammasandra 5267 4671 596 180 407 42 51 108 18 3976 485 Kittaganahalli 4073 3678 395 88 50 11 4 91 5 3449 375 Koppa 631 601 30 110 72 5 6 16 2 403 17 Koppa Gate 639 517 122 8 24 8 51 2 0 483 63 Kyalasanahalli 922 824 98 120 98 1 20 46 21 560 56 Lingapura 370 317 53 226 46 8 15 27 4 18 26 Mada Patna 2396 2331 65 23 13 4 4 4 0 2291 57 Maragondahalli 3777 3526 251 19 123 4 12 144 37 3240 198 Masthena Halli 630 624 6 85 8 0 1 13 0 518 5 Page 137 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Nanjapura 151 145 6 46 5 1 1 3 0 91 4 Rajapura 479 326 153 32 137 9 87 4 2 153 55 Ramakrishnapura 187 162 25 4 2 1 1 4 0 152 23 Ramasandra 169 156 13 22 48 0 7 16 0 70 6 S.Bingipura 916 912 4 56 145 0 1 0 0 711 3 Seethanaikana Halli 135 135 0 33 4 0 0 0 0 98 0 Thirupalya 10726 9676 1050 155 67 38 27 84 74 9370 911 Vaderamanchanahalli 1779 1741 38 51 14 4 0 6 1 1670 33 Veerasandra 5726 5561 165 64 73 15 6 21 1 5403 143 Yarandahalli 3392 3146 246 42 67 6 47 8 3 3029 190 Total 101297 93322 3146 2826 303 546 1433 85917 7975 490 6636 Within 5 Km to 10 Km A Medihalli 247 201 46 44 13 14 28 2 0 142 4 Adigondanahalli 595 582 13 211 36 2 0 5 0 330 11 Adur 257 232 25 57 49 3 13 4 0 122 9 Agasa Thimmanahalli 13 13 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 6 0 Ali Bommasandra 257 193 64 89 27 0 35 14 3 63 26 Amani Doddakere 21 20 1 15 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 Andapura 723 655 68 102 20 7 9 176 15 357 37 Aravantigepura 200 199 1 47 126 0 0 3 0 23 1 Avadadenahalli 292 292 0 61 15 0 0 0 0 216 0 Avalahalli 239 220 19 37 92 2 7 4 0 87 10 Bagganadoddi 212 168 44 97 61 3 40 0 1 10 0 Balagaranahalli 3145 2987 158 62 18 8 1 1 1 2906 148 Bandapura 416 276 140 116 81 8 17 8 14 71 101 Bannerughatta 3491 3301 190 74 171 17 59 212 16 2844 98 Begihalli 666 641 25 66 74 3 8 37 0 464 14 Bendiganahalli 317 311 6 56 21 1 0 2 0 232 5

Page 138 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 2617 2545 72 33 13 4 4 6 2 2493 62 Bommandahalli 352 352 0 91 135 0 0 2 0 124 0 Bukkasagara 909 834 75 58 62 8 6 26 1 688 60 Byagadadenahalli 1028 853 175 41 37 12 17 7 23 768 123 Byrappanahalli 204 185 19 13 3 0 0 2 0 167 19 Chandapura 2252 2133 119 131 265 18 13 70 16 1667 72 Chandrapura -Chatrakane 2529 2396 133 74 24 17 0 16 4 2282 112 Chikkanahalli 176 89 87 84 3 2 81 1 0 1 4 Gollahalli 76 68 8 0 0 7 0 0 0 68 1 Gowrenahalli 951 936 15 30 28 1 0 106 3 772 11 Guddahatti 1040 658 382 125 107 14 51 51 27 375 290 Gulimangala 438 249 189 59 27 37 62 12 19 151 71 Halesampigehalli 427 408 19 26 16 2 0 0 0 366 17 Harapanahalli 1441 1389 52 86 39 12 0 14 1 1250 39 Hasaruvani 11 9 2 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Honnakalasapura 241 230 11 85 57 1 4 13 0 75 6 Hullahalli 1672 1540 132 103 178 13 7 172 39 1087 73 Huskur 1070 896 174 195 45 16 30 15 1 641 127 Iggalur 2226 1970 256 192 309 15 15 100 15 1369 211 Indlawadi 740 735 5 305 36 1 0 2 1 392 3 Itchangur 823 737 86 128 105 1 0 1 0 503 85 J.Bingipura 52 50 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 49 2 Jangal Palya 357 226 131 194 3 3 2 7 37 22 89 Kadajakkanahalli 243 229 14 93 17 1 10 3 0 116 3 Kaggalipura 75 29 46 21 0 5 9 0 0 8 32 Kalbalu 1201 1171 30 35 14 4 2 1 0 1121 24 Kalkere 1204 787 417 12 8 14 6 6 1 761 396 Kammasandra Agrahara 389 389 0 62 69 0 0 1 0 257 0

Page 139 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Kempavaderahalli 123 122 1 27 84 0 0 0 1 11 0 Konasandra 397 366 31 97 14 1 2 37 0 218 28 Krishnasagara 457 443 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 441 14 Laxmi Sagara 445 444 1 83 9 0 0 3 1 349 0 Madivala 1072 1042 30 446 317 12 14 5 0 274 4 Mahanthalingapura 1387 1175 212 154 98 12 18 62 124 861 58 Mantapa 684 658 26 89 44 2 7 60 4 465 13 Marasur 1578 1559 19 179 132 2 2 11 0 1237 15 Marasur Agrahara 54 38 16 22 3 1 0 2 0 11 15 Muthanallur Amanikere 83 76 7 30 9 0 5 3 0 34 2 Nallasandra 338 298 40 85 26 2 6 7 0 180 32 Neralur 2797 2646 151 133 51 15 22 9 1 2453 113 Ragihalli 765 564 201 229 124 35 97 4 2 207 67 Ramasagara 1138 840 298 165 53 15 16 9 13 613 254 Sakalawara 421 389 32 95 21 3 3 11 4 262 22 Sidihosakote 923 713 210 392 127 9 192 15 1 179 8 Sonnanayakanapura 542 534 8 100 155 2 1 4 3 275 2 Soppahalli 221 221 0 68 120 0 0 0 0 33 0 Sriramapura 484 332 152 3 0 4 2 3 1 326 145 Suragajakkanahalli 592 582 10 98 83 1 1 13 0 388 8 Thattanahalli 496 354 142 174 116 2 29 6 9 58 102 Thimmasandra 101 65 36 62 1 0 25 0 6 2 5 Thirumagondanahalli 1064 862 202 140 90 17 61 23 4 609 120 Vaddara Palya 2675 2487 188 36 82 12 3 109 3 2260 170 Vaderahalli 44 43 1 3 0 1 0 17 0 23 0 BBMP (M Corp.) part 39729 35988 3741 266 1175 147 215 1183 94 33364 3285 Total 108479 98544 7097 5750 578 1326 3403 82294 9935 533 7498

Page 140 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.12.2.2 Industries within the study area

The area has more industrial estates with many leading industries are situated. Industrial estates located within the study area are given in Table 3-39. List of Industries are given in Table 3-40.

Table 3-39: Industrial estates within the study area

S.No Industrial Area Extent (Acres) 1 Jigani I 18 2 Jigani II 16 3 Veerasandra Phase I 14 4 Veerasandra Phase II 10 5 Bommasandra Phase I 25 6 Bommasandra Phase II 10 7 Dyavasandra 30 Source: PWC

Table 3-40: List of major Industries within the study area

S.No. Industries Location 1 Mallik Engineering Jigani 2 PS Paints & Coats Pvt Ltd Jigani 3 Shashi Bio-energy Products Jigani 4 Shree Shiv Granites Jigani 5 J’Pan Tubular Components Jigani 6 Aron Universal Ltd. Jigani 7 Hikal Ltd. Jigani 8 OTIS Jigani 9 Kirloskar Toyota textile machinery Pvt. Ltd. Jigani 10 Bill Forge Pvt Ltd Jigani 11 Kumar Organics Pvt. Ltd. Jigani 12 Cipla Limited Jigani 13 Mylan Limited Jigani 14 Micropack Jigani 15 HCL Technologies Jigani 16 Microbabs Jigani 17 Rich core Life sciences Pvt Ltd Jigani - Bommasandra Link Road 18 BIOCON Jigani 19 Strides Shasun Limited Suragajakkanahalli 20 Apotex Pharmachem Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road 21 Sigma Aldrich Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road 22 Anthem Bioscience Pvt Ltd Bommasandra 23 Ansell Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road 24 Sansera Engineering Pvt Ltd Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road

3.12.2.3 Health Facilities within the study area

The public and private health facility is available in the study area. The proliferation of private hospitals and clinics due to affordability, health awareness, education etc. Health facilities available in Anekal taluk is given in Table 3-41. Table 3-41: Health facilities available in Anekal Taluk

Page 141 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Community Health Taluk Hospitals PHCs Centre Anekal Anekal Anekal Attibele Dommasandra Jigani Sarjapura Marsur Chandapura Haragadde Hebbgodi Mahantalingapura Source: Health & family welfare department, Govt. of Karnataka

The public health facilities like sub centers and primary health centers, ambulance services are available.

The respiratory and skin related diseases are common health problems in any industrilzed area. People are complaining such issues during our interaction with them. The occupational and diseases due to the pollution are the main problem in the area. The air pollution due to the vehicle movement is more intense than the industrial pollution.

Accident is another issue due to the growing vehicular movement.

It has been observed that the ground water is depleted due to the over exploitation for domestic and industrial purpose. So the groundwater is contaminated with more toxic chemicals in addition to the pollution caused by the industries. Consumption of untreated water will create water-borne disease like Diarrhea, Typhoid, Filariasis.

Sexually transmitted diseases (STI), HIV/AIDS are responsible for an enormous burden of morbidity and mortality in the industrial area as migrants from different locations and availability of opportunities. The uncared and uncontrolled behavior change is causing a big social stigma in the industrial area. The concerned authority and industries are responsible for intervention and counseling. The other major health issue is mental health due to the stress, migration, unable to adaptability of new environments, windfall gain from assets. Also it increases the crime rate.

The accessibility of maternity centers and awareness made people use institutional delivery system. For understanding health profile of Anekal taluk, the health indicators are given in Table 3-42. Table 3-42: Health profile of Anekal Taluk

Page 142 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Indicators for Composite Taluk Development Index Indicators Anekal Taluk District Sex ratio (no. of females per 1000 835 916 males) Maternal Mortality rate 73 73 Percentage of Institutional delivery 100 99.9 Percentage Children fully immunised 78.6 100

Availability of Doctors per 1000 people 0.741 0.091

Source: Human Development report 2014

3.12.2.4 Sanitation Facilities & Drinking water facilities within the Study Area

The main source of drinking water is from Tap water and Bore well. The consumption of safe drinking water is fully followed. In case of sanitation, access to the sanitary facility (toilets) is not fully available. Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area are given in Table 3-43

Page 143 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 3-43: Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area Main Source of Drinking Water Tapwater Tapwater Tank/ Toilet Village Name from Covered Un-covered Tubewell/Bor River/ Other from treated Handpump Spring Pond/ facility un-treated well well ehole Canal sources source Lake source Within 5 Km Banahalli 2.9 87.3 0 0 0 9.8 0 0 0 0 30.4 Bande Nalla Sandra 0.6 99.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 Bommasandra 38.3 4.4 1.3 0.1 1.4 54.2 0 0 0 0.1 90.8 Chikka Hosahalli 0.7 96.4 0 0.4 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 47.8 Dyavasandra 15.4 59.2 7.7 0 0 16.9 0 0 0 0.8 36.2 Gollahalli 19.1 10.6 0 0 0 14.9 0 0 0 55.3 44.7 Haragadde 31.7 25.7 0.1 0 0 41.8 0.1 0 0 0.6 92.5 Harapanahalli 13.2 31.7 0 0 3.8 44.6 0 0.6 0 6 94.9 Hebbagodi 31.6 31.8 0.4 0 0.1 29.6 0 0 0 6.4 98.8 Hennagara 23.8 22.5 0 0 0.2 53.6 0 0 0 0 74.4 Hinnakki 74.9 22 0.7 0 2.1 0.3 0 0 0 0 67.2 Hosahalli 0 0 0 0 0 98.9 0 0 0 1.1 55.2 Hulimangala 49.1 12.4 0.5 0 0 37.7 0 0 0 0.3 50.4 Jigani 43.2 25.2 1.1 0.6 1.1 26.3 0 0 0 2.4 96.3 Kachanaikanahalli 72.1 8.8 0.1 0.1 0 18.7 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 90.5 Karpur 35.8 64.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.8 Kittaganahalli 52.8 9 0.1 0.1 0.7 37 0.1 0 0 0.4 96.4 Konasandra 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56.7 Koppa 4.3 93.3 0 0 0 1.8 0.6 0 0 0 81.2 Koppa Gate 0.3 98.7 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5 0 52.8 Kumbaranahalli 1.1 54.6 0 0 0 43.1 0 0 0 1.1 52.9 Kyalasanahalli 4 4.8 5.9 3 5.7 75.6 0 0.2 0 0.8 48.7 Lingapura 89 9.8 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0.6 29.3 Page 144 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Mada Patna 19.6 35.6 0 0.1 0 21.6 0 0 0 23 95.9 Mahanthalingapura 28.7 62.9 0 0 0 5.6 0 0 0.3 2.5 47.6 Maragondahalli 25.2 42.2 10.5 0.1 0.1 22 0 0 0.1 0 94.3 Masthena Halli 71.2 10.4 3 0 0 9.3 0 0 0 6 79.4 Muthanallur 36.2 37.8 2.1 0 0.2 23.7 0 0 0 0 65.1 Nanjapura 8.6 81 0 0 0 10.5 0 0 0 0 39 Nosenur 49.6 50.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70.9 Nosenur Gollahalli 0.9 81.2 0 0 0 17.9 0 0 0 0 14.3 Rajapura 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.1 Ramakrishnapura 12.1 87.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.4 S.Bingipura 8.9 1.4 0.2 0 3.8 81.6 0 0 0 4.1 43.3 Seethanaikana Halli 62.7 1.2 10.8 0 0 22.9 0 0 0 2.4 47 Thirupalya 31.2 39.6 0.5 0 0.1 22.5 0.1 0 0 5.9 79.8 Vaddara Palya 75.4 10.2 0 0 0 13.2 0.1 0 0 1.1 84.8 Vaderamanchanahalli 4.1 23.3 0 3.3 6.8 61.9 0 0.1 0 0.5 90.4 Veerasandra 40 28.7 0 0 1.3 29.6 0.1 0 0 0.2 94 Yarandahalli 34.9 1.3 0.2 0.1 4.1 51.6 5.5 0.1 0 2.3 91.7 Within 5 Km to 10 km A Medihalli 1 87.5 0 0 0 11.5 0 0 0 0 16.3 Adigondanahalli 76.6 10.9 0 0 0 12.1 0 0 0 0.3 53.9 Adur 65.6 30.6 0 0 0.6 3.2 0 0 0 0 34.4 Agasa Thimmanahalli 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 60 Ali Bommasandra 0 76.9 0 0 0 23.1 0 0 0 0 48 Amani Doddakere 0 66.7 0 0 0 33.3 0 0 0 0 59.8 Andapura 94.9 1.6 0.9 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 95.8 Anekal (TMC) 35.1 53.8 0.2 0 0.1 8.2 0 0 0 2.5 94.6 Aravantigepura 9.1 43.6 34.5 0 10.9 1.8 0 0 0 0 49.1 Avadadenahalli 0 58.3 0 0 0 41.7 0 0 0 0 30.1

Page 145 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Avalahalli 0.9 94.3 0 0 0 4.7 0 0 0 0 80.2 Bagganadoddi 2 94.1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 12.9 Balagaranahalli 6.1 68.3 0.1 0 0 25.2 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 93.9 Bandapura 0 95.3 2.6 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0.4 60.9 Bannerughatta 40.7 41.7 0 1.1 0 15.7 0.1 0 0 0.8 85.4 Begihalli 77.5 6 0.6 0.6 7.1 7.1 0 0 0 1.1 57 Bendiganahalli 0 82.3 0 0 0 16.6 0 0 0 1.1 58 Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 27.3 55.8 0.1 0 3.3 2.6 0 0 0 10.8 85.8 Bommandahalli 3.4 78.7 0.6 0 0 17.2 0 0 0 0 47.1 Bukkasagara 66.4 19.4 0 0 0.2 13.7 0.2 0 0 0 78 Byagadadenahalli 78.6 9.1 0 0 0 11.8 0 0 0 0.5 48.1 Byrappanahalli 97.2 1.7 0 0.6 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 96 Chandapura 34.6 5.2 0 0.2 0.3 59.4 0 0.2 0 0 92.3 Chandrapura -Chatrakane 11.9 15.9 0.1 0.1 0 39.7 0 0.1 3.4 28.8 96.5 Chikkanahalli 1.3 78.9 0 0 0 19.7 0 0 0 0 55.3 Gollahalli 19.1 10.6 0 0 0 14.9 0 0 0 55.3 44.7 Gowrenahalli 0.9 96.9 0 0 1.8 0.4 0 0 0 0 82 Guddahatti 2.4 51.6 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 60.5 Gulimangala 35.2 19.9 1.7 0 0.6 42.6 0 0 0 0 64.2 Halesampigehalli 88 5 0 0 0 6.9 0 0 0 0 89.6 Harapanahalli 13.2 31.7 0 0 3.8 44.6 0 0.6 0 6 94.9 Hasaruvani 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Honnakalasapura 2.9 83.7 0 0 12.5 1 0 0 0 0 37.5 Hullahalli 18.4 54.5 0.4 0.3 20.2 4.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.3 57.2 Huskur 30.3 31.3 0 0 1.2 36.9 0 0 0 0.3 87.2 Iggalur 38.4 42.8 0.2 0 0 18.4 0 0 0 0.1 79.2 Indlawadi 1.8 93.1 0 0 0 5.1 0 0 0 0 43.6 Itchangur 0 0 0 0 0 99.7 0 0.3 0 0 62.6

Page 146 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

J.Bingipura 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Jangal Palya 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Kadajakkanahalli 13.9 0 0 0 0 84.4 0 0 1.6 0 28.7 Kaggalipura 1.7 46.6 0 0 0 51.7 0 0 0 0 64.7 Kalbalu 6.6 86.7 0 0 6.4 0.2 0 0 0 0 51.4 Kalkere 30.2 1.1 0 0 0 68.7 0 0 0 0 68.7 Kammasandra Agrahara 0 86.3 0 0 0 13.7 0 0 0 0 32.4 Kempavaderahalli 75.6 24.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52.6 Krishnasagara 35.3 47.6 0 0 0 15.9 1.2 0 0 0 66.5 Laxmi Sagara 94.4 0.4 0 0 0 5.2 0 0 0 0 35.5 Madivala 12.2 38.7 0 0 0 48.3 0 0.2 0 0.6 51 Mahanthalingapura 28.7 62.9 0 0 0 5.6 0 0 0.3 2.5 47.6 Mantapa 30 53.2 0 0 1.4 11.6 0 0 0 3.9 71.3 Marasur 25 61.1 0 0 0 13.9 0 0 0 0 72.2 Marasur Agrahara 26.9 69.2 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Muthanallur Amanikere 0 83.1 0 0 0 16.9 0 0 0 0 92.1 Nallasandra 29 54.3 0.5 0 0 16.1 0 0 0 0 66.1 Neralur 10.2 11.6 1.5 0 0.1 76.5 0 0.1 0 0.1 88.7 Ragihalli 61.6 4.8 1.2 0 0 32.2 0 0.2 0 0 38.2 Ramasagara 19.5 54.7 0.2 1.1 0 23.3 0 0 0.4 0.8 79 Sakalawara 19.4 69.9 0.5 0 0 8.7 0 0.5 0 1 54.9 Sidihosakote 0.9 92.6 0 0 0 6.1 0 0 0 0.4 39.1 Sonnanayakanapura 64.8 26.3 1.7 1.4 3.1 1.7 0 0 0 1 32.1 Soppahalli 99.2 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.4 Sriramapura 4.3 47.4 0.9 0 42.2 4.3 0 0.4 0.4 0 94.8 Suragajakkanahalli 10.6 59.5 0 0 0 28 0 0.3 0 1.6 86.2 Thattanahalli 0 87.7 0.4 0 0 9.1 0 0 0 2.9 25.5 Thimmasandra 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Page 147 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Thirumagondanahalli 24.7 43.9 0 0 0 31.1 0 0 0 0.3 58.7 Vaderahalli 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 71.4 BBMP part 24.7 43.9 0 0 0 31.1 0 0 0 0.3 96.4

Page 148 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

3.12.2.5 Education facilities

The study area has a higher literacy rate due to the urbanization and industrialization of the area. The main reasons are the accessibility to the primary education and higher education. The literacy rate of the area is 83.74. The dropout rate is low due to the awareness of the importance of the education. The dropout rate in elementary education is 0.2 (Anekal taluk). Literacy details within the study area are given in Table 3-44.

Table 3-44: Literacy details within the study area

Village Name No. of Literates Percentage

Within 5 Km Banahalli 4476 86.91 Bande Nalla Sandra 1032 83.43 Bommasandra 12104 89.45 Dyavasandra 393 77.51 Gollahalli 6236 92.22 Haragadde 5876 84.39 Harapanahalli 2218 83.95 Hebbagodi 28258 91.22 Hennagara 2048 84.14 Hinnakki 826 68.10 Hosahalli 553 72.76 Hulimangala 1840 74.58 Jigani 12859 86.10 Kachanaikanahalli 4221 84.95 Kittaganahalli 5465 84.53 Konasandra 466 77.54 Koppa 1022 80.28 Koppa Gate 823 69.45 Kumbaranahalli 497 77.66 Kyalasanahalli 1308 76.90 Lingapura 600 76.43 Mada Patna 3100 85.90 Mahanthalingapura 1417 59.66 Maragondahalli 5906 78.43 Masthena Halli 1027 76.81 Nanjapura 219 60.83 Nosenur 763 73.51 Nosenur Gollahalli 369 78.68 Rajapura 634 78.56 Ramakrishnapura 158 57.25 S.Bingipura 1070 66.50 Seethanaikana Halli 216 72.48

Page 149 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Thirupalya 11765 87.08 Vaddara Palya 3151 77.06 Vaderamanchanahalli 1992 84.91 Veerasandra 7156 87.69 Yarandahalli 4340 86.82 Within 5 Km to 10 Km A Medihalli 307 74.51 Adigondanahalli 925 75.76 Adur 474 74.06 Agasa Thimmanahalli 15 78.95 Ali Bommasandra 467 75.08 Amani Doddakere 19 65.52 Andapura 1166 77.37 Anekal 32268 81.78 Aravantigepura 144 62.34 Avadadenahalli 398 66.44 Avalahalli 364 73.83 Bagganadoddi 171 51.66 Balagaranahalli 4215 86.66 Bandapura 576 74.71 Bannerughatta 5745 81.35 Begihalli 908 72.18 Bendiganahalli 414 73.14 Bhovi Palya 3148 81.07 Bommandahalli 433 63.03 Bukkasagara 1204 79.00 Byagadadenahalli 1155 86.19 Byrappanahalli 293 68.94 Chandapura 3428 86.17 Chandrapura -Chatrakane 4822 92.13 Chikka Hosahalli 859 71.05 Chikkanahalli 147 54.44 Gollahalli 78 63.93 Gowrenahalli 1169 63.74 Guddahatti 1064 73.33 Gulimangala 596 78.73 Halesampigehalli 668 82.67 Harapanahalli 2218 83.95 Hasaruvani 10 76.92 Honnakalasapura 265 60.36 Huskur 1819 78.51 Iggalur 3607 86.46 Indlawadi 1186 69.36 Itchangur 930 78.41 J.Bingipura 57 82.61

Page 150 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Jangal Palya 311 63.60 Kadajakkanahalli 349 70.22 Kaggalipura 170 79.81 Kalbalu 1376 78.09 Kalkere 2095 83.40 Kammasandra Agrahara 343 61.69 Karpur 1558 81.70 Kempavaderahalli 158 62.45 Krishnasagara 445 78.76 Laxmi Sagara 641 74.45 Madivala 1846 74.62 Mantapa 997 79.38 Marasur 2170 80.67 Marasur Agrahara 100 80.65 Muthanallur 1143 74.85 Muthanallur Amanikere 178 81.65 Nallasandra 544 75.98 Neralur 4292 87.34 Ragihalli 867 59.18 Ramasagara 1553 79.28 Sakalawara 546 73.49 Sidihosakote 1044 73.16 Sonnanayakanapura 580 54.87 Soppahalli 261 61.12 Sriramapura 809 83.14 Suragajakkanahalli 893 77.12 Thattanahalli 590 69.17 Thimmasandra 111 63.43 Thirumagondanahalli 1508 81.08 Vaderahalli 39 70.91 BBMP part 61098 87.65 Source: Census 2011

The available education infrastructure (Block level information about schools in the Anekal Block based on DISE 2015-16 data is given in Table 3-45.

Table 3-45: Schools in Anekal Block including both public and private management Colle with Upper Sec. with & Only/Jr. Primary Primary only Primary with Upper Primary Primary with Upper Primary Sec and H.Sec Upper Primary + and Sec H.Sec Primary Primary Upper Sec Seconly Hr.Sec ge Total 190 179 17 1 80 4 39 2 512 3.12.2.6 Other infrastructure facilities

Page 151 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

The common parks, gardens, play grounds are available in the project area, but it is not sufficient for the growing population. The open space required for the children and elder citizens to move around and for outdoor activity. It is very important for maintaining human health, so that it will strengthen the foundation of the society. Industries can contribute in developing and maintaining the parks, garden and open space as environmental and social activity. The area has traditionally enjoying open space and space for playing, but the haphazard developments will deter such facility. There are ample opportunities in the study area for developing tree avenues. As the urbanization is happening, the same time the road infrastructure is being developed for the man and materials being transported from up country area. The issue is the roads are getting damaged as the high vehicular movement. The length of the roads in Anekal taluk is given in Table 3-46. Table 3-46 : Details of roads in Anekal taluk

National Highway State Highway Major District Road 26 67.8 109.37

The area needs more passenger shelters at bus stops and appropriate road signs to be placed at conspicuous places. Summary of socioeconomic indicators within the study area is given in Table 3-47. Table 3-47: Summary of socioeconomic Indicators within the Study area

S.No Particulars Study Area Unit 1 Number of villages in the Study Area 109 Nos.

2 Total Households 85055 Nos.

3 Total Population 329236 Nos. 4 Children Population (<6 Years Old) 37386 Nos. 5 SC Population 67178 Nos. 6 ST Population 10439 Nos. 7 Total Working Population 209776 Nos. 8 Main Workers 191866 Nos. 9 Marginal Workers 17910 Nos. 10 Agricultural Workers 21572 Nos. 11 Household Industries 5859 Nos. 12 Other Workers 182345 Nos. 13 Institutional Birth Rate 100 Percentage 14 Childhood Immunization 78.6 Percentage

15 Literates 302751 Nos.

Page 152 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-32 Map Showing the Study area of the Project in Figure FD 0301

Page 153 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-33 Map Showing the Air monitoring locations in FigureFD0302

Page 154 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-34 Map Showing the Noise monitoring locations in FigureFD0303

Page 155 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-35 Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locations in FigureFD0304

Page 156 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 3-36 Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations in Figure FD0305

Page 157 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

Page 158 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1 General

Environmental Impact is any change in the environmental attributes, adverse or beneficial, caused or induced by the proposed action or set of actions. The predicted adverse impacts during each stage of project development are superimposed over the baseline status of the existing environmental quality to infer the scenario of environmental conditions in the post- project stage. The main purpose of identifying the impacts is that it helps in adopting appropriate mitigation measures for the adverse consequences if any.

It also addresses the prediction and evaluation of the various significant impacts that are likely to occur. The impacts on the environmental indices viz. air, water, soil, noise, biological and socioeconomic conditions are scrutinized methodically and assessed. The most likely impacts on the environment due to the proposed project need to be appraised during the operation phase. The particulars on impacts that could be triggered on the environmental attributes by the activities of the proposed project are discussed below.

4.2 Construction Phase

The total built up area is divided into various sections like production blocks, Engineering, warehouse, Administration, canteen, toilets etc. There is adequate space and provision for operations. The plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out all chemical reactions and processes.

As the entire infrastructure needed for expansion is already available there is no demand of any further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be manufactured and no other construction activities So there is no any impact on Land, Air, Water, Noise, Soil & Ecology Environment during change in product mix

4.3 Operation Phase

From an environmental perspective, this phase is of paramount significance due to its potential to invoke long-term impacts. The adverse effects that are likely to occur during this operational

Page 159 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report phase of the project are: Air Pollution (gaseous emissions), Effluent generation, noise generation, solid waste generation.

4.3.1 Air Environment

Base line data reveals that ambient air quality in the study area for the Parameters PM, SO2 &

NO2, are well within the permissible Limits as prescribed by the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Industrial Area, Residential, Rural & Other areas.

The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG sets, boilers and reactors. The DG set and boiler sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the emanating flue gases containing suspended particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen & TVOC, HC without affecting the ground level concentrations. The emissions generated from the reactors are scrubbed out by wet scrubbers.

4.3.1.1 Study Area

CIPLA is a global pharmaceutical company whose goal is to ensure that no patient shall be denied access to high quality & affordable medicine and support. The current study area is ideally positioned at Jigani industrial area, Bangalore, Karnataka shown in Figure 4-1.

Page 160 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-1 Study area showing the Stacks and DG set location in CIPLA boundary

4.3.1.2 Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate the ambient air quality due to emission of gaseous pollutant from Existing stacks for the study period (Sep to Nov 2016) by using numerical simulation methods. By using these methods we can determine the maximum ground level concentrations (GLC) for various air pollutants through air dispersion modeling technique. The maximum GLC’s would then be utilized to assess the extent and magnitude of potential air quality and its impact resulting from the emissions from the existing stack of CIPLA.

4.3.1.3 Meteorological Data

In order to understand the wind pattern of the study region wind-rose diagram was plotted using WRPLOT Figure 4-2. Over this period the predominant wind direction was between E and NE with 6.7% calm conditions. The metrological data for the month of November 2016 is considered for GLC modeling for evaluating ambient air quality. The various parameters like temperature, pressure, wind speed, wind direction etc., were considered and taken from secondary sources.

Page 161 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-2 Wind Rose diagram and frequency distribution for the month of Nov 2016

4.3.1.4 AERMOD Process

AERMOD is a modeling system consisting of three separate modules: AERMET, AERMAP and AERMOD. AERMET is a meteorological preprocessor and uses hourly surface observations, cloud cover, and upper air parameters respectively. The terrain preprocessor AERMAP uses Digital Elevation Model (DEM) maps as well as user generated receptor grids. AERMAP’s output file consists of the x, y locations of each receptor, mean sea level (MSL) elevation, and hill profile parameter.

AERMOD directly reads the three output files created by the pre-processing programs and, along with user-entered source information, predicts ambient air concentrations for a variety of pollutants and averaging periods ranging from 1-hour to annual. AERMOD has a regulatory default option, as well as rural or urban dispersion coefficients, urban population settings, and other features specific to the model. AERMOD also includes the Plume Rise Model Enhancement (PRIME) building downwash algorithm, which calculates directional specific building downwash widths and heights as well as downwash parameters for the cavity region of the building (earlier downwash algorithms ignored the cavity region, and models did not calculate concentrations for receptors located inside this area).

Page 162 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

4.3.1.5 The status of air pollution due to the existing DG sets Boilers and scrubbers

In order to obtain the concentrations from the existing boilers and DG sets installed in the study region emission inventory was carried out Table 4-1 and dispersion modeling was carried for PM, SO2 and NOx and accordingly Iso-concentration plots were generated and shown in Figure 4-3 - Figure 4-6. The first ten highest concentrations of each pollutant were summarized in Table 4-2 - Table 4-5.

Page 163 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-1 Existing Stack emission details of CIPLA

Existing Stack Kg/hr in Gas Exit Height Emissions (g/s) Proposed S.No Fuel Stack Source case of Temp Above Used Dia (m) liquid fuel (0 C) ground level (m) PM SO2 NOx CO DG SET (1250 220 Lts/Hr No change 1 HSD 232 0.31 20 0.044 0.0086 0.22 0.11 KVA* 3) 190 Lts/Hr 2 Boiler 2TPH * 3 FO 100 0.59 30 0.0681 0.1193 1.045 0.095 Solid waste 05 Lts/Hr 3 HSD 140 0.32 20 0.0006 0.0010 0.0092 0.0008 Incenerator 4 Scrubber - 1 NA NA 42 0.16 13 0.002222 5 Scrubber - 2 NA NA 46 0.16 13 0.001944 6 Scrubber - 3 NA NA 47 0.22 13 0.002778 7 Scrubber - 4 NA NA 48 0.62 13 0.027778 Negligible 8 Scrubber - 5 NA NA 48 0.48 13 0.019444 NA 9 Scrubber – 6 NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944

10 Scrubber – 7 NA NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944 11 Scrubber - 8 NA NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944 0.172 0.129 1.274 0.206 TOTAL (g/s)

Page 164 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-3 Ground level concentrations of PM during Nov-2016

Figure 4-4 Ground level concentrations of SO2 during Nov-2016

Page 165 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-5 Ground level concentrations of NOx during Nov-2016

Figure 4-6 Ground level concentrations of CO during Nov-2016

Page 166 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Particulate Matter Table 4-2 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER

UTM coordinates (m) Conc. Distance from Center Direction from S.NO E N (µg/m3) of Sources (Km) Source Center 1 786570.9 1414871 0.30717 1 W 2 787566.2 1413867 0.187 1 S 3 786570.9 1413867 0.17853 1.25 SW 4 787566.2 1414871 0.16099 0 0 5 785575.5 1414871 0.14448 2 W 6 788561.5 1414871 0.12372 1 E 7 787566.2 1412864 0.12018 2 S 8 783584.9 1411860 0.1118 5.02 SW 9 784580.2 1413867 0.10535 3.2 WSW 10 785575.5 1412864 0.0983 2.8 SW

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Table 4-3 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE

UTM coordinates (m) Conc. Distance from Center Direction from S.NO E N (µg/m3) of Sources (Km) Source Center 1 786570.9 1414871 0.31416 1 W 2 787566.2 1413867 0.18928 1 S 3 786570.9 1413867 0.17997 1.25 SW 4 785575.5 1414871 0.14718 2 W 5 788561.5 1414871 0.13942 1 E 6 783584.9 1411860 0.1127 5.02 SW 7 784580.2 1413867 0.10837 3.1 WSW 8 785575.5 1412864 0.09327 2.8 SW 9 784580.2 1412864 0.09214 3.6 SW 10 787566.2 1412864 0.09183 2 S

Page 167 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)

Table 4-4 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN

UTM coordinates (m) Conc. Distance from Center Direction from S.NO E N (µg/m3) of Sources (Km) Source Center 1 786570.9 1414871 3.22073 1 W 2 787566.2 1413867 1.94914 1 S 3 786570.9 1413867 1.85599 1.25 SW 4 785575.5 1414871 1.51219 2 W 5 788561.5 1414871 1.38386 1 E 6 783584.9 1411860 1.16228 5.02 SW 7 784580.2 1413867 1.1096 3.1 WSW 8 785575.5 1412864 0.98326 2.8 SW 9 784580.2 1412864 0.96397 3.6 SW 10 784580.2 1414871 0.93351 3 W

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Table 4-5 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER

UTM coordinates (m) Conc. Distance from Center Direction from S.NO E N (µg/m3) of Sources (Km) Source Center 1 786570.9 1414871 0.58723 1 W 2 787566.2 1414871 0.4002 0 0 3 787566.2 1413867 0.35873 1 S 4 786570.9 1413867 0.343 1.25 SW 5 785575.5 1414871 0.27649 2 W 6 787566.2 1412864 0.27254 2 S 7 788561.5 1414871 0.22724 1 E 8 783584.9 1411860 0.21481 5.02 SW 9 784580.2 1413867 0.20085 3.1 WSW 10 785575.5 1412864 0.19302 2.8 SW

4.3.1.6 CONCLUSION

From the Dispersion modeling results for the air pollutants due to existing DG set, Boilers and

8 scrubbers it is observed that the maximum concentrations of PM10, SO2, NOx and CO observed to be 0.307 µg/m3, 0.314 µg/m3, 3.221 µg/m3, and 0.587 µg/m3 respectively. So it can be concluded that the ground level concentrations (GLC) of PM10, SO2, NOx and CO are well

Page 168 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report within the standard of CPCB limits and the impact was negligible/minimum. The total increase in concentrations above baseline status to estimate the percentage increase and summarized in Table 4-6.

Table 4-6 Total Maximum GLCs from the proposed Stack Emissions for NOV 2016

Average Estimated Max. Base line Total Conc. NAAQ Distance from Pollutant Conc. from Direction Conc. (µg/m3) standard Source source (µg/m3) (µg/m3) SO2 13.8 0.314 13.8 80 1 W NOx 29.1 3.221 29.1 80 1 W PM 64.3 0.307 64.3 100 1 W

Since, no additional stacks are proposed the estimated concentration at source is already included in existing baseline. So the percentage (%) increase in concentration is zero.

4.3.1.7 Pollution Control Measures

Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control

There is no increase in emission source due to proposed change in product mix. All the reactors have condensers to condense the solvent vapors. The reactor vents are connected to the scrubber to neutralize the toxic vapors. Scrubbers have been provided with FRP/ water circulation type having neutralizing agents.

The Scrubber attached to control the fugitive emissions and the details are attached in Annexure P

Table 4-7 Air Pollution Control Measures

Page 169 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Existing Proposed Chimney height (in mts) Kgs/hr in S.No No of Sulphur & air pollution MoEF Approved Type of fuel case of stacks content control system liquid fuel provided proposed Attached to 5 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m No change 1 process AGL & scrubber Attached to 2 NA NA NA Dust collector 2 finishing area Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m 3 AGL & scrubber Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m 4 AGL & scrubber TFH system 1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL 5 200000 k cal Steam Boilers (2 3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL 6 TPH x 3) Solid waste 1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL & 7 incinerator 25 Scrubber kg/Hr Vapour 1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL 8 absorption (1250 x 3) KVA 3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL & 9 DG sets silencers

4.3.2 Water Requirement

Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.

4.3.2.1 Impact due to Waste Water Generation

The source of wastewater generation from CIPLA is as follows:  Industrial process wastewater/effluent  Boiler and cooling water blow down  Domestic wastewater/Sewage  Equipment cleaning and floor washings, etc.

4.3.2.2 Mitigation Measures

Page 170 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Various mitigation measures are existing to minimise the impact if any on the water environment due to the wastewater/runoff generation during the operation phase of the project.  Institutional arrangement for monitoring of water by pollution  Preventive measures as well as after, measures in case any contamination  Monitoring should ensure early determination of any threats to water resources in terms of contamination  If contaminated proper expertise need to be brought in to schematise the various recharge mechanism to reduce or nullify the impact effects.

4.3.2.3 Wastewater Quality and Quantity

Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Due to proposed there is no change in wastewater quality and quantity.

Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.

Table 4-8 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment

The source of waste water, treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of wastewater generated in Error! Reference source not found. & Figure 2-8 respectively and the ETP and STP process flow diagrams along with their specifications are attached as Annexure L.

Page 171 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

4.3.3 Noise Environment

4.3.3.1 Impacts

Major sources of noise generation in CIPLA unit, noise generation sources during operational phase are classified into two categories:

 Stationary sources due to operation of heavy duty machinery at the project site like Boilers, Compressors, DG sets, Pumps etc.  Mobile sources corresponding to mainly vehicular traffic for staff mobilization, materials, material transportation, liquid fuel transportation to project site, etc.  The impact of vibrations beyond the site would be negligible during normal operation phase. However, the impacts on workers engaged in the plant area would be considerable due to occupational exposure. The fixed major equipment/units such as boiler house, compressors, pumps, DG sets etc., also generate vibrations during operational phase and may cause exposures to the workers/operators engaged at these units.

4.3.3.2 Mitigation Measures

 The major noise generating equipment like Compressors, DG sets, TFH, Boiler Feed water pumps etc. is enclosed in an acoustic enclosure designed for an insertion loss of 25 dB (A) and silencers to other equipment etc.  Major noise generating equipment is designed with 85 dB (A) ensuring cumulative noise at 1.0 m remains at 85 dB (A).  The occupational noise exposure to the workers in the form of eight hourly time weighted average is maintained well within the prescribed Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard limits.  Adequate PPE are provided to the staff exposing to noise risks.  Acoustic silencers are provided in equipment wherever necessary.  Acoustic design with sound proof glass panelling is provided for critical operator cabins / control rooms of individual modules as well as central control facilities.  Use of personal protective equipments/devices such as ear-muffs, ear plugs etc. is strictly enforced for the workers engaged in high noise areas.  Existing premises will attenuate and mitigate noise levels, 33 % greenbelt developed along the periphery and at various locations within the industry.

Page 172 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 Ambient noise levels are monitored at regular intervals during operational phase of the project.  Various standards pertaining to vibrations are formulated by statutory bodies like Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) and Director General of Mines Safety (DGMS), which is being practiced would be continued to mitigate the workers’ health effects due to vibrations.

4.3.4 Solid waste management

4.3.4.1 Impacts

During operation phase is likely to generate various types of solid waste which can be broadly categorized as Hazardous Wasteand Non-hazardous Waste. Further, the generated solid waste generation may include Biodegradable, Recyclable and Inert compounds. If the solid waste generated is not properly managed and disposed in unauthorised manner, it will impact on soil quality, groundwater and air quality.

4.3.4.2 Mitigation Measures

The Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use and Strict guidelines put in place in order to manage the solid waste generation during the operational phase.

The various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. Agreement between TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also we have a valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes.

 Used Oil - Collected in Leak proof containers and disposed only to KSPCB registered authorized reprocessors provided the oil meets the standards as per schedule-5 part-A of the rules.  Oil soaked cotton waste, Process residues & Waste and Distillation Residue - Stored in a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co processing in cement kiln.  Spent solvent - Stored in a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB authorized recycler.

Page 173 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 Sludge from ETP & MEE - Stored in a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB authorized TSDF.

Thus, it can be concluded that there will be no impact on the surrounding environment due to generation and disposal of solid waste during operation phase of the project.

4.3.5 Land Environment

Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial area. The present land use is industrial. The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.

As the entire infrastructure needed for expansion is already available there is no demand of any further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be manufactured and no other construction activities induced. The Proposed activity does not change the land use classification of the site

There will be no increase in air pollution due to proposed Change in Product Mix, The Air and Emissions source from DG, Boilers, Process with APC measures, adequate stacks heights and vents attached to scrubbers will be within the norms. Moreover, vents of proper height have been provided for quick dispersion and dilution of pollutants into the air. Thus, there will be no additional effect on the surrounding soil due to gaseous emission from the project.

There will be no major effect of wastewater on soil, Installed ZLD plant to treat the effluent. The domestic wastewater will be disposed through septic tank / soak pit system. Thus, there will be practically very insignificant impact on land due to disposal of wastewater.

All necessary control steps for each type of Solid Wastes generated will be taken, and hence there will be no impact on solid wastes generation on surrounding soil environment.

4.3.6 Ecology

Air emissions, liquid effluent disposal and solid waste generation are likely to have some impact on terrestrial ecosystem. However, there will be no net increase in air pollution. Plant is already

Page 174 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report maintaining ZLD system and the solid wastes will be collected and disposed off properly. Hence, negligible impact on ecology is expected.

Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres, greenbelt developed along the periphery and at various locations within the industry.

4.3.7 Socio-Economic Environment

The project to manufacture bulk-drugs is likely to have certain positive impacts on socio economic environment.

Company has carried out various activities in nearby villages as part of their CSR like organizing blood donation camp, green belt development etc. The company will have an intention to spend around 2% of the profit as per company act. In coming year it is tentatively planned CSR activity as below.

Indirect employment potential - Various modes of indirect employment i.e. transportation, increased business opportunities to shopkeepers etc. Over-all there is improvement in quality of life of the people in the study area.

Thus, it can be said that the proposed project will have significant beneficial impact on the socio economic scenario in the study area.

Page 175 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

Page 176 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

5.1 History and Background of the Site

M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates manufacturing Unit with an area of 11.42 Ha (28.23 Acres) within the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Bengaluru. CIPLA Ltd. – 100% EOU, Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District – 560 105, Karnataka.

5.2 Current Proposal

As the proposed project is change in product mix in existing unit in KIADB Jigani, there are no alternative sites analysed as stated in section 5.1. However based on the current set up the following are the advantages of the site:  The project site is located within KIADB Industrial Area, which is notified industrial area  No R &R Issues  No public hearing is required as per EIA notification  Existing infrastructure of can be utilised for the proposed project  Site is well connected by road & rail  KIADB corridor road Bengaluru to Hosur NH-44 (old NH-7) at a distance of 5.4 km towards NE

Moreover this is now identified as one of the most important identified KIADB. This Industrial is a focused area for major development and also for future investment.

5.3 Results of the Analysis

Page 177 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

The process used for production is made by M/s. CIPLA Limited. And in house there would not be any changes in the process. The process made by M/s CIPLA Limited is cost effective with high quality in output.

No alternative site has been considered due to the benefits of the above site. With its innovative technology the project is expected to meet the market demands of the pharmaceutical products that will aid in addressing the issues in healthcare as well as lead to economic prosperity.

The current site is an earmarked industrial area by KIADB, Jigani. Therefore no further site analysis has been carried out under this EIA.

Page 178 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Page 179 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (EMP) 6.1 Introduction

The primary aim of environmental monitoring program is to formulate a systematic, site-specific plan for monitoring the environmental parameters within the impact area, during and after commissioning of the project, which would aid in assessing the effectiveness of mitigation and environmental protection measures implemented for the proposed project based on the existing environmental scenario and the probable environmental impacts appraisal.

The plan framed for the intended facility will describe:

 The details of the proposed mitigation measures taken for safeguarding the environment at the project site as well as in the vicinity of the industrial site  Details of management plans (Greenbelt development plan, Solid waste management plan etc)  Post project environmental monitoring programme to be undertaken after commissioning of the project.  The associated cost components of the pollution control systems installed at the site.

For each of the environmental attributes, the monitoring plan specifies the parameters to be monitored, location of monitoring sites, frequency and duration of monitoring and it also denotes the applicable standards, implementation and supervising responsibilities.

Environmental monitoring programme for the proposed project is formulated. Environmental Monitoring Programme is an important component during environmental management of the project. The institutional mechanism planned and implemented to mitigation and monitoring measures during all stages of the project is discussed in Chapter 9. The project management especially the Environmental Management Cell (EMC) (described in Chapter 9) should always go for a rational approach with regards to environmental monitoring. This includes judicious decision making in consultation with institutional stakeholders (e.g. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) or reputed environmental consultants for appropriate changes in the monitoring strategy, i.e., changes in the sampling frequency, sampling location, monitoring parameters and any new/additional requirements.

The following are the main objectives of the environmental monitoring program:  From ETP for the protection of water resources

Page 180 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 Provide information for documentation of monitoring of mitigation measures and impacts  Tool for the statutory authority of unanticipated adverse impacts or sudden changes in the environmental condition due to the proposed project  Provides information that could be used for evaluating the effectiveness of implemented mitigation measures  Provides information that could be used to verify predicted impacts and thus validate impact prediction techniques  The efficacy of the mitigation measures being followed during operational phases can be assessed and the measures can be revised, made more stringent and reinforced based on the monitoring results  Environmental Monitoring can also serve a basic component of a periodic environmental regulatory auditing program for the proposed project  Coordination with local bodies with regards to solid waste management

The following programme as detailed in the environmental monitoring programme for operation phases implemented by the CIPLA authority. Besides the monitoring, the compliances to all environmental clearance conditions and regular permits from KSPCB /MoEF&CC shall be monitored and reported periodically. The likely significant impacts and mitigation measures will also be monitored.

The environmental attributes to be monitored during operational phases of the project, specific description along with technical details of environmental monitoring including the monitoring parameters, methodology, sampling locations and frequency of monitoring are presented in Section below. 6.2 Objectives

 Ensure day to day operational activities are conducted in a manner in compliance with the applicable regulatory approvals including legislation and industry standards  Evaluate the adequacy of mitigation and pollution control measures implemented for reducing the adverse impacts caused during the construction and operation stage and suggest additional mitigation measures, if appropriate, in the light of the results  Define a detailed framework to monitor and document for achieving full compliance with statutory requirements  Encourage good environmental management practices through planning, commitment and continuous improvement

Page 181 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 Develop clearly defined environmental monitoring program designed to assess the nature and extent of environmental impacts of the proposed operations and progressively refine such programs against the targets  Define roles and responsibilities of site personnel and ensure that all people onsite are fully informed of their responsibilities and accountabilities with regard to the environment  To comply with all regulations stipulated by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)/ State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) related to air emission and liquid effluent discharge as per air and water pollution control act/ laws  To handle hazardous wastes as per the Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules 1989 and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and subsequent amendments  Review, improve and update environmental management procedures and standards  Establish response procedures for actual/potential environmental impacts including community complaints and ensure corrective action is taken  Perspective budgeting and allocation of funds for environmental management expenditure, Continuous development and search for innovative technologies for a cleaner and better environment.

Page 182 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

6.3 Project Environmental Monitoring

Environmental Parameters to be Frequency of No. of Sampling Locations Standards Methods for Sampling & Analysis Compliance Attributes monitored Monitoring Operation Phase Fine Particulate Samplers for PM10, PM2.5, National Ambient Air Quality PM10, PM2.5, SO2, Six (04) Respirable Dust Sampler fitted with Gaseous Air Quality Twice a week Standards released during NO2, O3 and CO sampling arrangements for for SO2 and NO2, November, 2009 O3, CO analyser /portable CO meter for CO Day and night noise Six (04) National Ambient Noise Noise Levels Once a month Portable hand-held noise level meter. levels Standards IS10500, 2012 drinking water Physical, Chemical standards for Groundwater and Biological Groundwater (03) Grab sampling and analysis by using standard Designated Best Use Water Quality In addition to the Surface water (03) Once a month methods. Classification of Inland Surface above, Alpha, Beta Water of National Rivers emitters (surface Conservation Directorate, water) MoEF&CC for Surface Water Soil texture, type, electrical Six (04) Collection and analysis of samples as per IS Soil conductivity, pH, Once a year Baseline data 2720 infiltration, porosity, etc., Wind speed, wind direction, rainfall, Hourly Meteorology Project Site IMD/CPCB manual - temperature, measurement humidity. One (01) Treated Wastewater Physical, Chemical Grab sampling and analysis by using standard Environment Protection  ETP Inlet Daily Quality and Biological methods. Amendment Rules, 2015  ETP outlet

Page 183 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

6.4 Monitoring by CIPLA

The environmental monitoring shall be carried out by CIPLA within their industry premises. Monitoring guidelines should clearly indicate the conditions of discharge and the consequences with regards to the penal action and the impact to ground water resources of the region. Groundwater is the sole water source for millions of people in the adjoining areas. CIPLA should not only limit the environmental monitoring as stated above, environmental monitoring programme in terms of parameters, location and frequency shall be formulated as per the stipulations laid by KSPCB/CPCB/MoEF&CC/SEIAA in their respective Environmental Clearance/Consent To Establish (CTE)/Consent To Operate (CTO).

6.5 Compliance Reports

As a part of environmental monitoring programme, following compliance reports shall be submitted to KSPCB and Regional Office of MoEF&CC.

 Half yearly compliance reports in respect of the stipulated prior environmental clearance terms and conditions on June 01 and December 01 of every calendar year  Environmental statement (Form-V) for the financial year ending March 31 to KSPCB on or before September 30 every year  Format for maintaining records of hazardous waste if any in Form-3 as per Hazardous and other Wastes (Management and Handling and Transboundary movement) Rules, 2008  Format for maintaining hazardous waste imported and exported in Form-10 as per Hazardous Waste (Management and Transboundary movement) Rules, 2016  Safety data sheet for hazardous chemicals shall be maintained as per schedule-9 of MSIHC rules, 1989 (amended 2000),  Format for maintaining notification of major accident in schedule-6 as per MISHC rules, 1989 (amended 2000)  Water Cess returns in Form-1 as per Rule 4 (1) of Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Cess Rules 1978 on or before the 5th of every calendar month.

6.6 Plantation Monitoring Programm

Page 184 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Environmental Management Cell/team will monitor the following activities of greenbelt and landscape development:

 Development of nursery (if possible)  Fencing of plantation area  Treatment and sowing of seeds  Weeding and soil working  Watering  Pruning (trimming of plant)  Transport of seedlings  Replacement/Inter planting  Planting of seedlings  Watch and ward of plantation

During operation phase periodic monitoring of plantation growth, manuring, watering, pruning, and replacement will be performed in order to properly maintain vegetation, greenbelt, landscape and green cover.

6.7 On-site Mock Drills Requirements

On-site mock drills are very important as it helps employees to be aware of the safety procedures and how to react during the time of crisis. Conducting mock drills at regular intervals enhances preparedness and checks the viability of environmental/disaster management plan. Mock drills are essential for the following reasons:

 Helps in revising/improving the environmental/disaster management plan.  Helps to evaluate whether the responsible officials are trained efficiently for the unforeseen event.  Helps in evaluating whether the emergency equipment are being maintained at CIPLA premises.

To ensure efficient environmental/disaster management, CIPLA authority/EHS department/EMP cell shall conduct periodic on-site mock drills in case of occurrence of the following activities:

 Fire, Natural calamities (cyclones, floods, earthquakes).  Power break down.  Oil spill.  Bomb threats; War alerts/terrorist attacks.

Mock drills should also involve fire department, police, municipal authorities, hospitals and other department/agencies that are mandated to provide emergency support. Documenting the outcome of mock drills is an important aspect as this helps in revising the existing plan more

Page 185 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report efficiently. In all safety programmes the right personnel need to be employed and this is of utmost importance.

Page 186 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES

Page 187 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 7.1 Public Hearing

The proposed project is located in Notified Industrial Area, the projects attracts the Category B as per EIA Notification 2006; As per MoEF & CC Office Memorandum, dated 3rd June 2009; EIA Notification, 2006 in para 7 (i), sub section III exempted from undertaking public hearing for expansion or modernization or change of product mix in existing projects. Hence this application based on MoEF Notification No. S.O. 804(E) of 14th March, 2017, Karnataka SEIAA has recommended to EAC, MoEF & CC under Category A, 5(f).

7.2 Disaster Management Plan

An onsite emergency plan is attributed to the response plan that contains and minimizes the effects due to emergencies within the installations which have a potential to cause damage to people and facilities within the installation premises.

The On-site and offsite emergency Plan is attached as Annexure R.

7.3 R& R

Rehabilitation and resettlement is not applicable since the project is in KIADB Industrial Area, Jigani of Bengaluru.

7.4 Risk Assessment

The Detailed risk assessment report for the proposed project is enclosed as Annexure R.

Page 188 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 8 PROJECT BENEFITS

Page 189 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

8 PROJECT BENEFITS

 Proposes for a change in product mix within the existing premises (without additional pollution load) with no overall change in production quantity of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) will play a vital role in the health care protection and thereby addresses the market demand and Social benefits.  The proposed project which has zero liquid discharge system, which does not discharge any effluent to ground or surroundings,  The proposal will bring trade and export opportunities to the country.  The products manufactured at this facility will be exported that will aid in adding to the revenue of the nation.  It will also provide employment opportunities to a larger population.  The corporate social responsibilities that will be taken up by the proposed project will improve the well-being of the society and the corporate responsibilities towards the protection of the environment will help in conserving the ecosystem.

Page 190 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Page 191 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

9.1 Introduction

This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the M/s. CIPLA Ltd, identifies the principles, procedures and methods that will be used to control and minimize the environmental impacts of the proposed minor construction and operational activities associated with the expansion project development. It is intended to ensure that commitments made by the CIPLA to minimize project related environmental and social impacts.

As part of our ongoing commitment to excellence in environmental and social performance we will ensure the following:

i. Fulfill all environmental conditions associated with project approvals. ii. Develop, promote and foster a shared sense of responsibility for environmental and performance of the project. iii. Promote environmental awareness and understanding among employees and contractors through training, identification of roles and responsibilities towards environmental management iv. Linking project performance to overall environmental performance. v. To monitor the environmental performance throughout the project and implement an adaptive management approach for continuous improvement and to meet the regulations.

9.2 Objectives of EMP

 To suggest the formation of a core group (Environment Management Cell) responsible for implementation of environmental control & protective measures as well as monitoring of such implementation.  To ensure project components are compliant with all laws and approval conditions.  Continue baseline monitoring  Facilitate a continual review of post construction and operation activities.  To suggest preventive and mitigation measures to minimize adverse impact and to maximize beneficial impacts like.  Preparation of afforestation or Greenbelt Development scheme.  Preparation of rain water harvesting scheme and energy conservation actions

Page 192 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

 To prepare a capital cost estimate and annual recurring cost for Environmental Management Plan.  To prepare a detailed action plan for implementation of mitigation measures.  Measure the effectiveness and success of proposed mitigation measures

9.3 EMP Roles and Responsibilities

9.3.1 Environmental Management Cell

The effective implementation of the mitigation measures and consistent functioning of the proposed project, an Environmental Management System has been proposed. The EMS included following:

 Environmental Management Cell  Environmental Monitoring Program  Personnel Training  Regular Environmental Audits and Corrective Action Plan  Documentation-Standard Operating procedures of Environmental Management

 All the activities will be monitored to ensure the appropriate implementation of all environmental mitigation activities and to identify areas where environmental management plan compliance is not satisfied.  For effective implementation of the system, it is also necessary to have a permanent organizational set-up. Company has set-up permanent Environmental Management Cell (EMC) for the effective implementation and monitoring of environmental management system.  The company assigned responsibility to the concerned for implementation of environmental control measures.  The Environmental Management Cell (EMC) set-up by the company is given as below;

Page 193 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 9-1 Environment Management Cell Organogram

This section describes the organizational structure and responsibilities for implementation of the EMP as shown below in Table 9-1.

Executive Director of the company will be responsible for total environmental management.

Table 9-1 EMC Responsibility

S. No Name & Designation Responsibilities 1 Unit Head Establish an environment management cell. (Mr. Subrat Satpathy) Responsible for overall environmental management. Operations and take feedback regarding all the activities performed under EMC and give directions to succeeding component. Provide sufficient resources for environmental management cell to reduce the environment impacts. 2 Department Head Develop an environmental Cell, headed by the Site Head and Global EHS Head with a (Dr. Sunil Kumar) team having EHS Professionals to implement EMP responsibilities. Oversight, implementation, monitoring and compliance of the EMP and any approval conditions, including construction supervision and performance of all staff, contractors and all subcontractors Review of EMP performance and implementation of correction action, or stop work procedures, in the event of breaches of EMP conditions, that may lead to serious

Page 194 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

impacts on local communities, or affect the reputation of the project Assisting the contractor with implementation of EMP sub-plans Ensuring compliance to all project social commitments, including implementation of corporate social responsibility. Report environmental performance of the project directly to MoEF & CC /SEIAA Report on environmental performance also to other government regulators as required. Non-compliance / violation of environmental norms, if any are reported to VP-EHS and Site Head/Director and immediate required action is taken. Implementation of the Environmental Monitoring Plan during construction and operation. Supervision of contractor performance of implementation of the Construction. Reporting any incidents or non-compliance with the EMP to the KSPCB. Ensuring adequate training and education of all staff involved in environmental supervision. Reporting to MoEF & CC / SEIAA regarding EMP performance as part of an overall commitment to continuous improvement 3 Environment-Section Treatment and disposal of trade effluents and sewage effluent as per consent. Head Carryout ambient air quality monitoring as per consent. (Mr. Sinraj ) Monitoring the stack / chimney. Hazardous waste management handling and disposal. Plant and maintain adequate numbers of trees and gardens around the Industry Applying and getting the consent of operation of air & water and authorization to store the hazardous waste Prepare Management Information System (MIS) reports and budget for environment management program. To deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the conditions prescribed by KSPCB.

In addition to the above, company will have HSE policy to adhere with standard operating process in order to comply with the statue and bring into focus any infringement of any norms and directives with regards to the Health, Safety and Environment and to take further corrective actions.

9.3.2 Compliance against the Consent Condition

Compliance against the consented conditions shall be observed with respect to the following Acts,

 Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974  Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1981  Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Trans-boundary Movement) Rules 2016.

Table 9-2 Compliance against the Consent Condition

Page 195 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

S. Description Frequency Remark No. 1. Renewal of Consent Once in 3 years Application for renewal shall be done 60 days before the expiry date. 2. Environmental Statement Once in a year Would be submitted for every financial year before 30th September of next year. 3. Hazardous Waste Returns Once in a year Would be submitted for every financial year before 30th June of next year. 4. Cess Returns Monthly Twelve Returns would be submitted every year.

9.3.3 Compliance to the Recommendations Mentioned In the CREP Guidelines

The Ministry of Environment & Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has launched the Charter on "Corporate Responsibility for Environmental Protection (CREP)" with the purpose to go beyond the compliance of regulatory norms for prevention & control of pollution through various measures including waste minimization, in-plant process control & adoption of clean technologies. The Charter has set targets concerning conservation of water, energy, recovery of chemicals, reduction in pollution, elimination of toxic pollutants, process & management of residues that are required to be disposed of in an environmentally sound manner. The Charter enlists the action points for pollution control for various categories of highly polluting industries. The Task Force was constituted for monitoring the progress of implementation of CREP recommendations/ action points.

9.3.4 Roles and Responsibilities for Environmental Management

The roles and responsibilities of Industry are brought out in Table 9-3. These roles and responsibilities can be shared by developer as a part of agreement with CIPLA industry and shall have clear terms on environmental management responsibilities.

Table 9-3 Roles and Responsibilities of Industry

S. Component Responsibility of Industry No. 1 General agreement Strictly adhere to the plot allotment guidelines and agreement.

No pollutant shall be released to Natural water systems that affect the common people of the region. 2 Water supply Water requirement shall be met from existing water supply scheme at KIADB (Inhouse Borewell and through tankers)

Groundwater shall not be contaminated by discharge of pollutants into streams, ponds and other surface water bodies. 3 Water Industry adopted recycle/reuse methodologies to the maximum extent possible. (Zero Liquid recycle/reuse discharge facility and Rain water Harvesting)

Page 196 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

S. Component Responsibility of Industry No. 4 Wastewater The wastewater conveyance (pipeline) within industry provided collection/ conveyance 5 Treated Monitoring of wastewater on a regular basis by CIPLA carried out as per SOPS and regulatory wastewater standards at their respective holding for pH, TDS, TSS, BOD &COD etc. monitoring protocol 6 Rainwater Rainwater harvesting in industry premises adopted. harvesting 7 Waste Industry have independent Hazardous/Non-hazardous waste collection and segregation system and management has a temporary storage facility for 90 days detention which is designed as per the requirement. Wastes is periodically disposed to nearby TSDF and approved agencies as per the Hazardous waste Authorisation issued by KSPCB. Industry shall follow “The Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Third Amendment Rules, 2016”. 8 Post project Industry specific critical pollutants shall be monitored at industry level. environmental Specific requirement of monitoring and carried out as a part of compliance to CTE/CTO. monitoring

9 Stack monitoring Stack monitoring carried out by MoEF approved laboratory 10 Greenbelt Greenbelt and green areas developed in the industry level as per KSPCB norms. development 11 Storm water Storm water collection within the industry provided and discharge facility into the common storm management water drains provided. 12 Truck parking Industry provided on-site parking spaces for trucks within the industry premises.

9.4 EMP for Construction Phase

Proposes for a change in product mix within the existing premises with no overall change in production quantity of APIs. Also no additional infrastructure facilities are required for the project..

Total built up area is divided into various sections like production blocks, Engineering, warehouse, Administration, canteen, toilets etc. There is adequate space & provision for operations. The plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out all chemical reactions and processes.

As the entire infrastructure needed for change in product mix is already available there is no demand of any further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be manufactured. So there is no impact on Land, Air, Water, Noise, Soil & Ecology Environment.

9.5 EMP for Operational Phase

Page 197 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Monitoring during the operation phase shall reflect those environmental and socio-economic issues that may persist upon completion of construction activities. Monitoring shall focus on evaluating the effectiveness of project mitigation measures and continue baseline monitoring and sampling. The mitigation measures to prevent adverse impact during the operation phase of the project shall focus on the following:

1. Air quality 2. Noise environment 3. Water quality and water resources 4. Solid and hazardous waste 5. Land environment 6. Ecology 7. Socio Economic

9.5.1 Air Quality

The major source of emission is from Boiler, reactor stacks & DG stack. The details of proposed source of air pollution & corresponding Air Pollution control equipment are already given in Chapter 4 Environmental Impacts and mitigation measures.

APC measures are adequate stack height to disperse the pollutants. Adequate green belt has been developed to mitigate the pollution arising due to movement of vehicles. Regular monitoring of DG-Stack and Ambient air quality will be carried out.

Table 9-4 Air Pollution Control Measures

Existing Proposed Chimney height (in Kgs/hr in S.No No of Sulphur mts) & air pollution MoEF Approved Type of fuel case of stacks content control system liquid fuel provided proposed Attached to 5 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL & No change 1 process scrubber Attached to 2 NA NA NA Dust collector 2 finishing area Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL & 3 scrubber Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL & 4 scrubber TFH system 1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL 5 200000 k cal

Page 198 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Steam Boilers (2 3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL 6 TPH x 3) Solid waste 1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL & 7 incinerator 25 Scrubber kg/Hr Vapour 1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL 8 absorption (1250 x 3) KVA 3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL & 9 DG sets silencers

Fugitive emission control

CIPLA has some action plan to control fugitive emission from reactors. The following is the action plan

 The outfall of reactor is connected to primary condenser,  Then outlet of primary condenser is passes through the secondary condenser, emission passes through condenser will get condense.  The condensed emission will be recycled to process.  From vapor condenser cloud it again recycled to reactor,  In case of leakage of emission due to damage will detect manually and repair shall be taken up.  Thus the fugitive emission is arrested

Page 199 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 9-2 Method to recovery solvent and to control fugitive emissions 9.5.2 Noise Environment

The major source of noise pollution in the industry is DG sets, boilers, reactors, Air compressors, Boiler feed water pumps. DG sets are provided with integral acoustic enclosures. Also the ambient noise levels will be ensured within the ambient standards by inbuilt design of mechanical equipment and buildings apart from vegetation along the periphery and at various locations within the industry premises. The plant will be specifically designed with due consideration on minimizing noise pollution. Higher noise levels may be felt only near the active working areas and therefore the workers are provided with personal protective equipment as a safety measure.

Following measures are proposed to mitigate negative impact of operation phase of the project on the surrounding noise environment.  All the noise generating equipments will be designed / operated to ensure that noise level does not exceed 75-70 dB (A) at plant boundary as per the requirement of Central / State Pollution Control Board.  Noise generating sources will be maintained properly to minimize noise generated by them.  Wherever feasible, acoustic enclosures will be provided for compressors, DG  Compliance with noise control norms will be given due importance at the time of purchase of various equipments and it will be mentioned while placing the purchase orders and guarantee for noise standards will be sought from suppliers.  Moreover, all the personnel working in other high noise generating areas too will be provided with sufficient ear protecting devices.  Green belt will act as a noise barrier.  Training will be imparted to personnel to generate awareness about effects of noise and importance of using PPEs.

9.5.3 Water and Wastewater Management

Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.

Page 200 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of 40 KLD capacity. The treated wastewater of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and Toilet flushes.

Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.

9.5.3.1 Rain Water Harvesting System

We have developed rain water harvesting structures to harvest the runoff water from the rooftops and storm water drainage system for recharge of ground water. Rain water harvesting is the techniques through which rain water is captured from the roof catchments with closed pipe system (without mixing surface water to avoid the spillage contamination) into the recharge pits & excess water is stored in the Rain water Storage.

Page 201 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 9-3 Rain Water Harvesting System

Note: Total Rain water harvesting potential is 39065 KL/A. Process buildings are not considered for the calculation of Rain water harvesting potential.

Page 202 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

9.5.4 Solid and Hazardous waste Management

9.5.4.1 Solid waste management The Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. The Municipal solid waste (Organic waste from canteen and pantry) generate150 kg/day. The total manpower is 300 nos during Operational phase. MSW given in Table 9-5

Table 9-5 Municipal Solid Waste

Type of waste Existing Proposed

Quantity Kg/day Collection method Disposal method

Organic waste 150 Bins Composting & Local No change from canteen and pig farm pantry As per CPCB guidelines: MSW per capita/day =0.45

9.1.1.1 Hazardous waste Management The various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. There is a Agreement between TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also we have a valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes. Hazardous waste and management given in Table 9-6

Table 9-6 Hazardous waste and Management

Waste Existing Proposed Category Hazardous Quantity Method of handling waste Generated Existing Proposed Total

Collected in Leak proof containers and No Change disposed only to KSPCB registered 5.1 Used Oil 15 KL/A 15KL/A authorized reprocessors provided the oil meets the standards as per schedule-5 part-A of the rules 5.2 No Stored in a secured manner and hand Oil soaked 0.5MT/A changes over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co cotton waste 0.5MT/A processing in cement kiln

Page 203 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Kcal/Kg.

20.3 Stored in a secured manner and hand Distillation 10 MT/A 10MT/A over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co Residue processing in cement kiln 28.2 Spent Stored in a secured manner and hand 1200 KL/A solvent 1200KL/A over to KSPCB authorized recycler /

9.5.5 Land Environment

Following measures are proposed to mitigate negative impact during operational phase of the project on the land environment.  Air emissions are effectively controlled by use of scrubbers and therefore deposition of air pollutants in and around the premises and surrounding area is not envisaged.  Disposal of solid waste is carried out through authorized vendor.  Plant is being maintained ZLD. No effluent is discharged directly on land without treatment., impact on the land environment is not envisaged.  Hazardous materials are prohibited to be drained or dumped in the premises. Accidental spills shall be cleaned, reported and monitored.  Thus, no impact on land is envisaged due to discharge of gaseous emission, solid waste or liquid effluent from the proposed change in product mix.

9.5.6 Ecology

Since the proposed project is equipped with the treatment system, and the treated effluent will be sent to RO and recycled to process boiler, feed, chiller and green belt. Solid wastes generated during the operation phase are disposed off through authorized vendor and hence no impact is anticipated due to solid waste in and around the site. The air pollution control devices are already in place in the facility will control release of air pollutants to a greater extent, however a two tiered thick green belt consisting of shrubs and trees around the periphery of the site has been planned to intercept and arrest air pollutants released at various heights and to

Page 204 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report attenuate the increased quantity of air pollutants released into the environment. It is expected that the ecology of the region is preserved by these mitigation measures.

9.5.7 Green Belt Development Plan

Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres, greenbelt developed along the periphery and at various locations within the industry.

A well designed green-belt helps in intercepting particulate matter and gaseous pollutants and helps in purifying the air. Trees acts as effective barrier and absorber of noise. The green belt around an industry acts as a buffer in the event of emission control equipment failure and acts as an indicator in the event of toxic release by visible morphological changes in the leaves, stem etc. To accrue the benefits of greenbelt and to maximize its potential in environmental management around an industry, choice of the green belt tree and shrub species plays a vital role.

Selection of Trees

Adequate numbers of saplings are planted all along the periphery of the plant and available open spaces. The major aim of greenbelt development plan is to attenuate air pollutants released into the environment but it can also help in overall improvement in the environmental conditions of the project site. The plan will address the following issues such as attenuation of air pollution, noise reduction, improving the biodiversity of the region, adding aesthetics and combating soil erosion and prevention of land degradation.

Page 205 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

For development of greenbelt in outside of private property it is advisable to select tree species high are tolerant to air pollutants, since certain species of trees has the ability to uptake large quantities of SO2 than other species and grow at a faster rate by utilizing the available nutrients in the soil etc. In general, following factors have to be considered for the selection of tree species.

 Native tree species should be preferred over non-native trees.

 The trees must be tolerant to all the pollutants present in the area.

 The trees which are evergreen and forms large round canopy with broad leaves.

 The morphological feature of leaves like rough surfaced and large number of stomatal aperture.

 The trees should be able to grow faster and should help in stabilization of the soil.

 The tree should consume only less ground water and tree which sucks more water will not select for plantation.

 The trees should maintain ecological, land and hydrological balance of the region

9.5.8 Socio – Economic Environment

As due to the proposed project various modes of indirect employment i.e. transportation, increased business opportunities to shopkeepers, small scale business entrepreneurs etc. will lead to development of the area.

9.6 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND SAFETY SYSTEM

9.6.1 Hazard Identified In the Factory

1. Health hazard due to exposure to chemicals and chemical spillage 2. Fire hazard due to use of flammable chemicals 3. Fire and explosion hazard due to various chemical reactions

9.6.2 Scenario Based Emergency Actions

1. Action plan in case of Solvent leakage from flange joints or from bottom valve etc., a. Shift In-charge / Department Head should be informed immediately.

Page 206 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

b. Access the situation. c. Only trained personnel shall approach the area using suitable personnel protective equipment’s. d. Stop leakage by closing isolation valve. e. Stop hot work in surrounding area. f. Isolate the power supply of the respective area. g. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area. h. Cover drains / isolate from other plants with the help of sand or soil. i. Affected persons should move to fresh air and seek medical help further. j. Spills shall be contained with spill control sorbents and disposed to authorized incinerator

2. Action plan in case of Fire in Centrifuge due to Solvent vapour a. Shout and break MCP b. Trained should fight the fire with suitable PPEs.

c. Extinguish fire with DCP / CO2 / Foam extinguisher. d. In case the fire not controlled with the use of portable fire extinguishers, start fighting by using fire hydrant system with mobile foam unit. e. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area. f. Close valves on solvent pipe lines. g. Cool down MLR tank by water spray. h. Isolate the power supply of the respective area. i. Close / isolate the drains with sand or soil. j. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention.

3. Action plan in case of Fire or Explosion a. Shout and break MCP. b. Trained should fight the fire with suitable PPEs.

c. Extinguish with DCP / CO2 / Foam Extinguishers installed at site. d. In case the fire not controlled with the use of portable fire extinguishers, start fighting by using fire hydrant system and use mobile foam unit for solvent fire. e. Isolate the power supply of the respective area. f. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area. g. Cool down nearby receivers / service tank, reactors etc by water spray.

Page 207 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

h. Isolate interconnection of tanks, reactors, service tank, charging valves, receivers etc. i. Other pipelines are to be checked for isolation. j. Close / isolate the drains with sand or soil. k. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention. l. Fire tender shall be called for help and Fire water runoff shall be contained and diverted to ETP

4. Action plan in case of Toxic Release a. Shift In-charge / Department Head should be informed immediately. b. Only trained personnel shall approach the area using suitable personnel protective equipments. c. Check the wind direction; decide route of escape and evacuating persons should run perpendicular to the wind direction and not against / along the wind direction. d. Evacuating personnel should use wet handkerchief on their nose. e. Inform the neighborhood if required and if they are likely to be affected. f. Ensure that only essential personnel are in the affected areas. g. Rescue the persons trapped / injured. h. Person present in other buildings should close their windows and doors to prevent any entry of leaked gases. i. Trace the source of leakage or spillage and isolate the system from other equipment. j. Isolate the electrical supply to the affected area. k. Trap the leakage into a suitable scrubber. l. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention.

5. Action plan in case of Electric Fire or Shock a. Isolate the power supply to the affected area immediately before approaching the site. b. Do not use water for extinguishing the fire. Use CO2 type or DCP type or dry sand to extinguishing the fire. c. Remove any flammable or combustible material from the vicinity of the incident. d. Remove the affected person to an open area and check his breathing. e. If he is unconscious and not breathing initiate artificial resuscitation procedure. f. Do first aid for any burn injury.

Page 208 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

g. Physically isolate the burnt electrical components. Do not energize till the entire circuitry is checked with megger or other devices with safety mechanisms.

6. Action plan in case of leakage or rupture of Solvent / Fuel storage tanks a. Area should be evacuated immediately and cordoned off. b. Affected persons should be thoroughly washed using clean water and given necessary medical aid. c. Personnel entering the area should make use of suitable personnel protective equipments. d. Leaked tank must be depressurized immediately by transferring remaining quantity into another tank or container. e. Leakage source must be traced and plugged. f. Isolate the nearby electrical points and prevent any fire being brought nearby. As a precaution mobilize extra fire extinguishers to the spot to tackle fire if caught. Spilled material spreading should be contained in a dyke and transferred to container or it must be absorbed on sand or earth. g. The contaminated sand or earth must be neutralized and then dumped at safe place or burned in the fire pit. (flammable liquids should not be absorbed by combustible solids like saw dust or combustible fibres) h. If a spilled material in to the trench of electrical cables, then it should be drained with natural gradient and wash with large quantity of water continuously after de energising the cable. i. If a spilled material gets into the storm water drain or sewer line then it will be continuous and diverted to ETP.

7. Action plan in case of Compressed Gas Cylinder Leakage a. Move the cylinders to well ventilated area, and barricade the area. Never try to repair the leaks when the equipment under pressure. b. Immediately contact supplier to get the necessary information and help. c. If fire catches to cylinder, do not try to extinguish the cylinder fire. Only cool (by pouring water) and protect the nearby equipments from the safe distance.

8. Action plan in case of Cryogenic Gas (Liquid Nitrogen) Leakage a. Allow the spillage to evaporate by providing good ventilation. b. If you feel the ventilation is insufficient, then immediately evacuate the area.

Page 209 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

9. Action plan in case of Water Reactive Chemical Spillage a. Do not put water on the spill. b. If it is liquid, use neutralizing agent and inert material like dry sand to absorb spillage. c. If it is powder / crystalline, avoid generating dusty conditions, sweep up material. d. Placed to bag, label the bag and send to ETP for safe disposal. e. Wash the spill area.

10. Action plan in case of Leakage through Pipe Line & Storage tanks a. If the leak in a pipe line, immediately stop the supply to corresponding pipe line b. To remove the spilled material from that area, procedure to be followed based on the nature of material / chemical.

Table 9-7 Identification of Hazards In Each Departments/Section With Hazard Area Map and Affecting Population

Sl No Department Nature Of Work Hazard Effected Population 1 Production Handling Chemical Toxic Release 24 Reactions Fire And Explosion

2 Maintenance Regular Work Fire 12 Elecrtrical Work Electrical Hazards Fabrication Work 3 Quality Control Chemical Analysis Fire And Explosion 10 Chemical Mixing Chemical Exposure 4 R&D Chemical Reactions Fire And Explosion 5 Chemical Mixing Chemicalexposure Gas Handling 5 Stores Material Handling Fire 5 Solvent Loading And Chemical Exposure Unloading Chemical Handling

9.6.3 Available Safety Systems

1. Emergency Equipments and PPEs Each Emergency Cupboard consist the following items 1. Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) 2. Air suits / Air Line Respirators 3. Respirator / Full Face Mask (Air purifying) 4. PVC / Acid Suit

Page 210 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

5. Helmet 6. Ear Muff 7. Safety Glass & Face Shield 8. Gum boot 9. Safety Belt 10. Manila Rope / Life Safety Rope 11. Fire Axe 12. Fire Proximity Suit 13. Fire Gel Blankets / Water Gel Blanket 14. Resuscitator 15. Spill Kit 16. Safety Ladder 17. Emergency Flameproof Torches

2. Work Zone Monitoring Equipments

We have multi gas / toxic gas and oxygen detectors in that multi gas detector can be used to

check oxygen, LEL, VOC, CO and H2S concentration in atmosphere and also in confined spaces like inside the reactor, overhead tanks, underground tanks, sump etc and oxygen detector can be used for checking oxygen concentration in atmosphere and also in confined spaces like inside the reactor, overhead tanks, underground tanks, sump etc.

We are having Hydro Carbon Sensors (HCS), installed in all critical areas and these will provide the alarm once the set level is crossed.

3. First Aid Boxes A first aid kit is a collection of supplies and equipment for use in giving first aid. First Aid boxes are available in Security Room (ECC), Admin Block and at OHC. First Aid items will issue to injure only by authorized persons. Following are the contents of First Aid Box, a. Dettol – Antiseptic solution b. Ciplox – Eye Drops

Page 211 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

c. Soframycin – Skin ointment d. Silverex – Burn ointment e. Betadine – Microbicidal solution f. Iodex – Pain reliever g. Sterilized Cotton Wool h. Adhesive Plaster i. Surgical Paper Tape j. Small Sterilized Dressings k. Medium Sterilized Dressings l. Large Sterilized Dressings m. Sterilized Burn Dressings n. Roller Bandage – 5 cm wide o. Roller Bandage – 10cm wide p. Band Aid q. Crocin / Paracetamol Tablet

Along with the above safety systems, we have also ensured the below safety features to ensure Zero Accident. 1. Dedicated underground solvent storage area with flame proof electrical connections, breather valve, enough jumpers and earthing & bonding facility to unload the solvent from road tankers. 2. No ignitable zones are declared and marked so. 3. Work permit system with strict compliance. 4. Dedicated chemical storage area with good ventilation and exhaust system and all chemical are stored as per compatibility. 5. Dyke walls provided for the day storage chemical tanks. 6. All reactors provided with safety valves followed by rupture discs and relief valve outlets are extended. 7. Calibration is ensured for the gauges of pressure, temperature and vacuum. 8. All reactors will be hydro tested and certified by the competent person once in a year. 9. Body earthing provided to all equipments involved in the process, electrical earthing, static earting and instrument earthing provided wherever required. 10. Nitrogen provision provided to all reactors in view of providing nitrogen blanketing during handling of flammables.

Page 212 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

11. Process block zones are classified as per flameproof area zonal classification and accordingly used the flameproof electrical fittings. 12. Scrubber system with lye circulation is installed to create vapor free work environment and to release neutralized / non toxic fumes to the environment. 13. Touch pads are provided in all prominent places to discharge our body static electricity. 14. Wrist bands are provided to use during charging of chemicals in to reactors to avoid static electricity. 15. Zero interlock, proximity switch and nitrogen line provision provided to all centrifuge system to avoid personal injury and fire hazard. 16. Safety relief valve and gate limit switch provided to all RCVDs to avoid explosion and personal injury. 17. Air handling units (AHUs) with BIBO (Bag In Bag Out) are provided to keep the work environment in controlled manner (air flow pattern, temperature and humidity) to reduce the exposure to chemicals. 18. Ventilation air units (VAUs) and Exhaust air units (EAUs) and are provided to ensure good ventilation in the work environment. 19. Isolators are provided to handle potent chemicals. 20. HAZOP will be carried for all molecules.

Table 9-8 Emergency Shutting Down Procedure

Hazards Possible Hazards Shutting Down Procedure General Fire Fire And Explosion Switch Off Power Supply To Affected Area Use Mcp To Communicate Emergency Team Remove Other Inflammable And Combustible Materials Solvent Distillation Raise Of High Stop The Agitator Temperatures And Stop The Heating Pressure, Apply Cooling To The Jacket Of And Inform To The Higher Authority For Explosion And Fire Hazard Further Action And Shut Down The Plant Electrical Fire Electric Fire And Shock Switch – Off The Electrical Supply Of The Equipment Or Panel Involved In The Fire Switch – Off The Mains Of The Entire Section In Case Fire Spread Remove Flammable Liquid Drums Materialswhich Are Likely To Catch The Fire Use Only Dcp Or Co2 For Extinguishing The Fire

Dg Fire Use Nearby Foam Extinguisher If Fir Is Small Use Mcp And Communicate To Emergency Team Clear The Area Of Diesel And Other Combustible Materials Change Dg Control Panel Switch To Off Mode And Switch Off Dg By Turning The Key To Off Position Isolate Fuel Supply By Closing The Valve Hazards Possible Hazards Shutting Down Procedure

Page 213 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Fireboiler (Diesel Fired) Explosion Leave The Place If Rise In Temp And Pressure Is Rapid. Communicate To All By Using Mcp Switch Off Boiler Firing And Fd Fan Keep Water Running If Automation Fails Then Perform The Above Operation Arrange For Blowdown Do Not Leave The Place Untill Normalcy Is Achieved,

Fire /other exigencies

Discoverer communicates byphone or personally to the security gate

Security Supervisor activates the emergency siren (15 seconds ON and 05 OFF for 3 timesand communicates to Factory

Incident Controller(shift supervisor) Dispatch the fire fighting team to the rushes to the spot spot

Alert the employees thro’ Public If it is controllable, isolate the area & do Address System for evacuation fire fighting

Ensure the Evacuation of the people from work spots. If it is uncontrollable shutdown all the process and evacuate the area & ensure the fire agencies arrive at the spot & fire Arrange fire brigade /first aid/ is extinguished Ambulance

Prevent unauthorized people entering into the company Head count / Assembly Point / First Aid

“All Clear” siren to be activated by the Security Supervisor after confirming with the site controller

Figure 9-4 Alert Action Plan during Working/Non Working Hours

Page 214 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

SITE CONTROLLER

Leading emergency

Coordinators

COORDINATOR COORDINATOR COORDINATOR – COORDINATOR COORDINATOR –

Law & Order & Hospitals & Fire Head count & Communication Rescue coordination Govt. agencies brigade Information to

Relatives

SAFETY SQUAD

FIRST AIDERS

Figure 9-5 Emergency Organization Chart

Page 215 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

9.6.4 Occupational Health and Safety Program

Industrial Hygiene is one of the fast emerging fields and is a critical requirement for the well being of employees, for which CIPLA has developed a comprehensive Occupational health program.

The occupational Health Management system / the industrial hygiene and medical system protects and enhances health, productivity, and wellness by anticipating, recognizing, evaluating, controlling, and managing workplace health hazards (e.g. chemical, physical, biological, ergonomic, psychological, etc). These systems also mitigate illnesses and injuries by promptly recognizing, treating, investigating, and taking corrective actions.

CIPLA Occupational Health & Wellness Program covers the policies, work practices and procedures to provide a safe and healthy environment and protect the shop floor employees, laboratory employees and researchers from health hazards associated with the use of hazardous chemicals.

Occupational Health Monitoring

Medical Surveillance Program: Medical surveillance program is essential to assess and monitor employees' health and fitness both prior to employment and during the course of work; to determine fitness for duty and to provide emergency and other treatment as needed. Effectiveness of a medical program depends on active involvement of employees.

 Developing a OH-IH Medical Surveillance Program

 Pre-Employment Examination and Periodic Medical Examinations

 Determination of Fitness for Duty

 Communications

 Emergency Medical Treatment

 Medical Records

Pre-Employment Screening / Examinations- All employees shall be subject to pre-placement medical examinations to determine their fitness for the nature of jobs on site. Potential exposures to the work environment shall be considered before placing an employee on the job.

Page 216 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Periodic Medical Examinations- Periodic medical examination is the same as the pre- employment screening and may be modified according to current conditions, such as changes in the employee's symptoms, site hazards, or exposures.

Comparison of sequential medical reports with baseline data is essential to determine biologic trends that may mark early signs of adverse health effects, and thereby facilitate appropriate protective measures. The frequency and content of examinations are normally one year.

Page 217 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 9-6 Safety, Health and Environment Policy

Page 218 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

9.7 Corporate Social Responsibility

The Company is aware of the obligations towards the society and to fulfil the social obligations, company employed semi-skilled and skilled labour from the nearby villages as much as possible and also try to generate maximum indirect employment in the nearby villages by appointing local contract workers.

The company will have an intention to spend around 2% of the profit as per company act. In coming year we have tentatively planned CSR activity as below.

The various CSR activities identified and planned in the coming year are described below;

A. Education & Skill Development 1. Award Scholarships / fellowships to deserving students to encourage education. 2. Provision of uniforms, books, and stationery, necessary equipments etc, to schools. B. Health 1. Promote awareness programmes against social evils such as addictions, AIDS etc., 2. Providing nutritional supplements to lactating mothers, children and pregnant women. 3. Conducting the blood donation camp. C. Sanitation 1. Provision of sanitation facility in the villages by building common toilet. D. Providing waste collection bins to villagers 1. Providing waste collection bins to the villagers for disposing the municipal waste at their house. E. Tree Plantation in Village 1. Company will plan to provide saplings to the nearby villagers and school. 2. Plantation along the road side and development of garden / greenbelt on government barren land. F. Other Social Welfare Activities 1. Financial & infrastructure assistance during disaster & other crisis incidents 2. Participate & contribute in local religious and social programs

Page 219 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

The activities listed above are not limited to and Company will plan and perform other activities according to the need of local community in future.

Table 9-9 CSR activities carried out (2013 to 2016)

Project Sl. Implementing Beneficiary No. Object Project Narration Amount (INR) partner Location

CSR Spend FY 2013 – 2014 Support towards Ms. Bhargavi S medical expenses of Mr. Sanjeev S 1 Medical Kundargi the needy 85000 Kundargi Bangalore Support for empowerment of girls Project on Girl child Other Charitable & womens from slum and Women 2 Activity community empowerment 500000 CREST Bangalore Construction of Two classrooms for Govt. Higher Primary Hirendanahalli 3 Educational School, Hirendahalli Panchayat School 1291134 Self Bangalore Support towards medical expenses of 4 Medical Mr. Jaya Mendon the needy 95000 Mr. Jaya Mendon Bangalore

Total 1971134 CSR Spend FY 2014 – 2015 Construction of Washroom blocks for Men and Women at Towards construction Humanitarian Hands of washrooms at Home for destitute, ill Humanitarian Transit 1 Medical and old aged people Home , Bangalore 1168800 Self Bangalore Support towards NGO engaged in purchase of serving under medicines & other privileged children & basic necesscity of destitute home that Humanitarian Trasit shelters abandoned & Senior Citizens 2 Medical Home, Bangalore ill old aged 500000 Bangalore Bangalore Nethra Chikitsa Towards supply of Shibira (Eye check-up specs during for Free camps including Eye check-up camps Shraddha Eye 3 Medical screening and for communities 263641 Care Trust Bangalore

Page 220 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

treatment for Cataract including screening, cases) consultation, aid to correct refractive errors, and treatment for cataract cases Towards construction Construction of of washrooms at Washroom blocks at Govt. High School at Educational Govt. High School, Doddabanahalli 4 (Infrastructure) Doddabanahalli village 491456 Self Bangalore Construction of Towards construction Multipurpose of Community Hall community hall at Building, Educational Bandenallasandra Bandenallasandra 5 (Infrastructure) village village 751336 Self Bangalore Support towards purchase of "FOSA Humanitarian medicines & doctors Hospital" Unit of RVM fees for providing Foundation, Free treatment to needy hospital for poor, FOSA patient at subsidies needy and destitute Humanitarian 6 Medical rates people 500000 Hospital Bangalore Total 3675233 CSR Spend FY 2015 – 2016 Construction of Towards construction Multipurpose of Community Hall community hall at Building, Educational Bandenallasandra Bandenallasandra 1 (Infrastructure) village village 961711 Self Bangalore Awards to Meritotious Merit Awards to SSC students from Students of Govt. economically Weaker 2 Educational High schools sections of society 61250 Self Bangalore Towards construction Construction of of washrooms at Washroom blocks at Govt. High School at Educational Govt. High School, Doddabanahalli 3 (Infrastructure) Doddabanahalli village 658833 Self Bangalore Mobile Science Lab Project includes Project for 20 Govt. Hands on Science Primary schools anf classroom session, Agastya Govt. high schools in Young Instructor International 4 Educational Bangalore Urban and training, Science fair, 1678127 Foundation Bangalore

Page 221 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Rural Teachers training, Community visits and other supporting activities Funds towards the Medical expenditure Support towards for Bone Marrow Bone Marrow Transplantation of Transplantation for children suffering Children with from Thalassemia, a Sankalp India 5 Medical Thalassemia Genetic disorder 1400000 Foundation Bangalore

Total 4759921

CSR Spend FY 2016 – 2017 1 Skilling Support towards Support towards 1,13,000 Self Training room chairs purchase of Furniture for SCB Skill centre for SCB Skill centre 2 Skilling Low cost model As part of 8000 Self making competition environmental day observation, conducted low cost model making competition conducted with government school children 3 Health Support for Purchase Support towards 1,87,000 Self of Sports Equipments purchase of sports equipment to Childrenof Government School Doddabanahalli 4 Education Merit Awards Financial support to 48,000 Self the high achieving students in Government Schools 5 Health Sanitation facilities at Support for 6000 Self Govt High School, construction of Doddabanahalli washrooms for Village Government School Children,

Page 222 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Doddabanahalli Village 6 Health Sanitation block at Support for 8000 Self GHPS, Siddanapalya construction of washrooms for Government School Children, Doddabanahalli Village 7 Agastya Mobile Science Lab Hands on Science 12,88,000 Agastya Foundation at Banglore training to International Government School Foundation Children near Virgo Nagar Unit Total 16,58,000

CSR Spend FY 2017 – 2018

Education Mobile Science Lab in Hands on science Agastya 1 Bangalore experience to 11,16,000 International Government School Foundation Children

Education Merit Award Financial support to 2 the high achieving 72,000 Self-Implemented students in Government Schools

Support towards 3 Siddanapalya construction of Health Sanitation Block washrooms at 8,64,000 Self-Implemented Government Primary School, Siddenapalya village

Health Veerenahalli RO Support for 4,01,000 Self-Implemented 4 Plant construction of RO Water Plant

Education Class Room GLPS Support towards 11,08,000 Self-Implemented 5 Yedakola Village construction of class rooms at GHPS Yedakola village

Page 223 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Skilling Enable Vision - Digital Support towards 6 Literacy for visually computer literacy 40,00,000 Enable India impaired program for visually differently abled people. Support towards the Education Sponsorship towards education of children 7 special education for with developmental children with disabilities 1,50,000 Spastic Society Disabilities

Total 77,11,000 CSR Spend FY 2018 – 2019 1 Education Science on Wheels at Hands on Science Agastya Banglore Training to 11,54,000 International Government School Foundation children .

2 Education Financial support to best achieving studens in 70,000 Government School Merit Award Self-Implemented

3 Skilling Enable Vision- Digital Providing computer Enable India Literacy Program for training to people who Visually Impaired are visually differently 41,94,000 abled

4 Health Support towards Support towards Bone marrow transfer Bone marrow transfer Sankalp India at People Tree at People Tree 30,00,000 Hospital Banglore Hospital Banglore Foundation

5 Education Sponsorship towards Sponsorship towards special education for special education for children with children with Spastic Society Developmental Developmental 50,000 disabilities disabilities

6 Health Support towards one Karunashray 12,75,000 ward in Palliative care Support towards one

Page 224 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

ward in Palliative care

Total 97,43,000

Projection for 2019-20:

Extension of Mobile Science Lab - Virgo Nagar - Budget Rs. 13,79,923 Kallabalu Lake Rejuvenation- Plantation Project - Bommasandra Rs. 6, 50,000 Merit Awards Rs. 70,000 approx Enable India Last Payment Rs. 69,673

Page 225 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Figure 9-7 Corporate Responsibility Policy

Page 226 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Table 9-10 Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan

S.No Equipment Investment EMP 1 MEE Nil 2 ETP Nil

3 RO Plant Nil 4 Lab Nil 5 Green Belt Area 10 Lakhs 6 DG Acoustic Already provided

7 Online Monitor Not applicable Air Pollution Equipments 8 Boiler Chimney NA 9 DG Chimney NA 10 Scrubber 30 Lakh EHS 11 Fire Alarm Systems 20 Lakhs

12 Fire Hydrant System 4 Lakhs

13 Fire Fighting Equipments 2 Lakh

14 Flame Proof Fittings NA

15 Safety Equipments Existing unit

16 OHC NA

17 Annual Medical 2 Lakhs Checkups

Total 67.5 Lakhs

Page 227 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 10 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

Page 228 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

10 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION 10.1 Summary

An environmental Impact Assessment Study has been carried out and assessed for the proposed project based on the TOR and baseline quality data collected for the study area. Identification and anticipation of the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed project with a delineation of appropriate impact mitigation measures in an Environmental Management plan during both construction and operation phases is provided in the EIA report prepared.

The proposed project will ensure that the industrial activities relevant to the project are environmentally sound with no adverse impacts posed on the natural environment in the surrounding area.

The marginal impacts that might be caused by the proposed activity will be mitigated by the existing pollution control and environmental management measures.

In a true and a larger sense, in view of the considerable benefits from the project with no major impacts, the proposed project is said to be more beneficial to the nation.

The EMP that will be implemented for the construction and operation stages of the project will include:

 Air Pollution control and management  Noise Control and Management  Hazardous and Solid waste Management  Sewage treatment and Management  Effluent treatment and Management  Hazardous and solid waste management  DMP (Risk Assessment, Onsite and Offsite emergency Plan)

In order to effectively implement the EMP planned, an environmental management system will be formulated.

Page 229 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

10.2 Conclusion

The baseline study carried out for the study area indicates that all the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the environmental attributes in the surrounding area are well within the permissible limits.

Based on this environmental assessment, the possible impacts during both pre-project and post-project phase are anticipated and the necessary adequate control measures are formulated to meet the statutory compliances.

With very minute negative impacts, the project positively leads to commercial business opportunities, Employment opportunities, increased revenue and infrastructural development.

Thus this project may kindly be granted Environmental Clearance.

Page 230 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

CHAPTER – 11 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT

Page 231 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

11 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT

In order to assess the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed Change in Product Mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit by M/s. CIPLA Limited, Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. CIPLA has engaged Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited, Chennai to undertake EIA study. The nature of consultancy service rendered covers terrestrial environmental assessment.

11.1 Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS)

Enviro Care Systems was started in the year of 1997 by Dr. J.R.Moses with the vision to serve the world in all environmental related problems by completing the latest technological advancements available.

In the year 2004, Enviro Care Systems became Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd after having collaboration with Hubert Stavoren B.V. for higher Technology.

The company provides total pollution control solutions to several industries like Thermal Power Plant, Pharma, R&D Facilities, Electroplating and Manufacturing, IT Parks, Residential Complexes, Dairies, Food Processing, Textile mills, Breweries, etc.

The company is specialized in executing projects right from concept development, supply, erection, commissioning and operation on turnkey basis. HECS has successfully executed more than 200 environmental engineering projects for various industrial sectors both in India and overseas.

HECS has state-of-art facilities to provide quality environmental consultancy and engineering solutions.

Strengths of HECS

Number of Employees

Total No of Employees 736 Consultancy 26 Laboratory 77 Projects 19 Operation & Maintenance 614

Page 232 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Quality Policy of HECS

Page 233 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

QCI-NABET - EIA Accreditation

Consultancy Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai NABET Certificate No NABET/ EIA/ 1619/RA 0083

MoEFF Reg. Lab F.No. Q-15018/13/2016-CPW

National Accreditation Board for Education & Training (NABET) is a constituent board of the Quality Council of India (QCI). QCI, NABET has accredited HECS for carrying out Category ‘A & Category B’ EIA studies in the following sectors:

Page 234 Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Further details may be seen on the following URL: www.hecs.in

Page 235