Identification and Characterization of a Homophilic Binding and Neuritogenic Site in the Cell Adhesion Molecule L1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Identification and Characterization of a Homophilic Binding and Neuritogenic Site in the Cell Adhesion Molecule L1 Identification and Characterization of a Homophilic Binding and Neuritogenic Site in the Cell Adhesion Molecule L1 Xiaoning Zhao A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Biochemistry University of Toronto O Copyright by Xiaoning Zhao, 1998 i National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 ofCmada du Canada Acquisitions and Aquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellingtori OttawaON KIA ON4 OtiawaON K1AW canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distnbute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fonne de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantid extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otheMrise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Xiaoning Zhao Department of B iochemistry University of Toronto 1998 Thesis Title: Identification and Characterization of a Homophilic Binding and Neuritogenic Site in the Ce11 Adhesion Molecule LI Abstract The neural ce11 adhesion molecule LI is an integral membrane glycoprotein which mediates cell-ce11 adhesion and promotes neurite outgrowth from neuronal cells. Mutations in the LI gene have been implicated in several neurological diseases. To investigate the mechanism and the relationship of these two intrinsic f'unctions of LI, studies were carried out to identify specific domain(s) and sequences involved in homophilic binding and the promotion of neunte outgrowth. Recombinant L 1 domain proteins were used to identiS the domain involved in L 1 homophilic binding. Results based on Covasphere binding assays indicate that the second Ig-like (Ig2) domain of L1 is sufficient and necessary for hornophilic interaction. Results from neurite outgrowth assays further demonstrate that the Ig2 domain of LI is a potent neuritogenic substrate. The colocalization of these two intrinsic activities of L1 suggests a close relationship between homophilic binding and the promotion of neunte outgrowth. Several HSAS/MASA (Hydrocephalus as a result of stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylviud mental retardation, aphasia, shuffling gai t and adducteci thumbs) mutations have been localized to L1 Ig2. The effects of two HSASlMASA mutations on the homophilic binding and neuritogenic activities of recombinant L1 Ig2 were assessed. The HSAS mutation R 184Q abolished both Ig2-associated activities, while the MASA mutation H210Q had only modest effects. The deleterious effects of these two mutations thus correlate very well with the severity of their respective clinical phenotype. The results aiso implicate a role for Arg- 184 in L1 homophilic binding The synthetic oligopeptide approach was used to identiQ the homophilic binding site in LI Ig2. The peptide containing sequences flanking Arg-184 (HIKQDERVTMGQNG) inhibited both L1-dependent ce11 aggregation and neunte outgrowth, whereas the peptide consisting of flanking sequences of His-210 had only minor effects. Further analysis using peptide analogues indicates that the charged residues as well as the hydrophobie residues irnrnediately adjacent to Arg-184 may also play an important role in L 1 homophilic binding. Peptides that inhibited L 1 homophilic binding also inhibited L 1-dependent neurite outgrowth, suggesting a direct link between these two intrinsic activities of L1. I would Iike to take this opportunity to extend my special thanks to my Ph.D. supervisor Dr. Chi-Hung Siu, for his guidance, encouragement, patience and enthusiasm. He taught not only science during my years in his laboratory, but aiso how to be a good scientist. He is the person who put confidence in me, which 1 will be gratefbl in my hiture career. 1 would aIso like to thank my graduate study committee membea, Dr. John Roder and Dr. A. Bennick, for their advice on my project and ail their help dong the way of my graduate training. I also thank them for reading my thesis and giving me vaiuable suggestions. I would like to thank dl members in this laboratory, past or present, for dl their help, their encourage, and their Company. They provided vaiuable advice and discussion for my project, and left me with wondemil memories of rny graduate years. 1 would like to thank my parents for their love and support. They guided me to the road of science, and provided me the strength and courage to go on. I would also like to thank my grandmother, who is the one who always has trusted in me and believed that 1 could have a doctoral degree since I was in elementary school. 1thank the Medial Research Council of Canada for their financial suppon. Finally, 1 would like to thank my dearest husband Qingyang Huang, for his patience when waiting for me in the lab for my late experiments, for his encouragement when I was frustrateci, and most importanily, for his love and support. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ......................... ....... .................................................... ............................ 1 Acknowledgments ............................... .., ....................................................... iii Table of Contents ................................................................................................ iv ListofFigures ..................... ... ......................................................................... ...vi List of Tables .................................................... .......... ................ vrii List of Abbreviations ...... ................... ,. ......... ix Chapter 1: Introduction 1. Ce11 Adhesion. ............................................................ ..................... 2 . CeIl Adhesion Molecules ........................................................... 4 III. Cell Adhesion. Molecule L 1 ....................................... - ..-...... ........... 24 IV. Descnpuon of the Project .................................. ..................... 47 Chapter LI: Colocalization of the Homophiiic Binding Site aml the Neuritogenk Activity of the CeII Adhaion Moiecule L1 to its Second Ig-like Domain 1. Introduction ....................................... ,. 67 II. Experimental Procedures................................................................... 70 III, Results ................. ........ ....................................................................... 77 N. Discussion ........... .......................................................................... 85 Chapter III: DifZerenaal Effects of Two Hydrocephalus/MASA Syndrome Mutations on Che Cell Adhesion Molecule LI 1. Introduction ....................... ..., ................................................................ 1 15 II. Experimental Procedures ................ ......... .... ............. ............... 1 17 III. Results .........-..................-....., ....... ........ 120 IV. Discussion .............................................................................................. 124 Chapter N: Identification of the Homophüic Bindiog Site in ~mmunogiobulin-lüreDomain Two of Uie CeII Adhesion Molecule L1 1. Introduction .......... ..... ............................. .-... ... ..................... 142 II. Experimental Procedures.... .. ...... .. ..... ... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. 145 . Results ............................................................................................ 150 IV. Discussion .. ..-. .... .... ..... .. ..-..... .... ... ..... ......... .... -..... ...... .. ... ... .... ..... .... .... 157 Chapter V: Conclusions And Futnre Perspectives ........................................... 182 Appendu 1: Two-hybrid Screening for Proteins Interacting With Ceil Adhesion MoIecuie LI 1. Introduction ............................................. ............................................ 189 . Exprimenid Procedures ..................................................................... 191 III . Results ......................... .. ....................................................................... 196 IV . Discussion .................................................................................... 200 Reference ............................................................................................................ 215 Pages Chapter 1: Integrin Subunit Associations and Ligand Specifkities ...................... Schematic Structure of Integrin............................ .... ............................ Schematic Stnicture of Selectin ........................................................ Structural Organization of the Classicd Cadherins ..................... ........ Topology Diagrarns of Ig-iike Domains .............................................. Peptide and Domain Structure of Human Cell Adhesion Molecule Ll Alignment of Ig-like domains of Human L1 ......................... ....... List of Ll Mutations Implicated in Hydrocephalus and MASA syndrome ................................. ... .......................................................... Chapter 11: Construction and expression of GST fusion proteins ...............
Recommended publications
  • Clinical Significance and Biological Role of L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule In
    www.nature.com/bjc ARTICLE Molecular Diagnostics Clinical significance and biological role of L1 cell adhesion molecule in gastric cancer Takashi Ichikawa1, Yoshinaga Okugawa 1, Yuji Toiyama1, Koji Tanaka1, Chengzeng Yin1, Takahito Kitajima1, Satoru Kondo1, Tadanobu Shimura1, Masaki Ohi1, Toshimitsu Araki1 and Masato Kusunoki1 BACKGROUND: L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is highly expressed in malignant tumours and might play a pivotal role in tumour progression. METHODS: We analysed by immunohistochemistry L1CAM protein expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from 309 GC patients. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to clarify the prognostic impact of L1CAM in GC patients. We evaluated L1CAM gene expression in fresh frozen specimens from another group of 131 GC patients to establish its clinical relevance. The effects of changes in L1CAM were investigated in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: L1CAM was mainly expressed in tumour cells of GC tissues. Elevated L1CAM expression was an independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival, and an independent risk factor for distant metastasis in GC patients. PSM analysis showed that high L1CAM expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis. L1CAM gene expression using fresh frozen specimens successfully validated all of these findings in an independent cohort. Inhibition of L1CAM suppressed cell proliferation, cycle progress, invasion, migration and anoikis resistance in GC cells. Furthermore, L1CAM inhibition suppressed the growth of peritoneal
    [Show full text]
  • L1 Induces Colon Cancer Metastasis but Not EMT and CSC Markers
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on December 1, 2010; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0406 Author manuscripts havePublished been peer reviewed OnlineFirst and accepted on December for publication 1, 2010but have not yet been edited. L1 induces colon cancer metastasis but not EMT and CSC markers L1-mediated Colon Cancer Cell Metastasis does not Require Changes in EMT and Cancer Stem Cell Markers Nancy Gavert1, Alessia Vivanti1, John Hazin1, Thomas Brabletz2, and Avri Ben-Ze’ev1 1Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel 2Department of Visceral Surgery, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str 55, Freiburg, 79095, Germany Running title: L1 induces colon cancer metastasis but not EMT and CSC markers Key words: L1, colon cancer, metastasis, EMT, CSC Corresponding author: Avri Ben-Ze’ev Tel: (972)-8-9342422 Fax: (972)-8-9465261 E-mail: [email protected] Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Copyright © 2010 American Association for Cancer Research Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on October 1, 2021. © 2010 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on December 1, 2010; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0406 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. L1 induces colon cancer metastasis but not EMT and CSC markers Abstract Aberrant activation of WNT/β-catenin signaling is common in most sporadic and inherited colorectal cancer (CRC) cells leading to elevated β-catenin-TCF transactivation. We previously identified the neural cell adhesion molecule L1 as a target gene of β-catenin- TCF in CRC cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Cadherin Structures and Sequences: Affinity Determinants and Protein Architecture
    Learning from cadherin structures and sequences: affinity determinants and protein architecture Klára Fels ıvályi Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Klara Felsovalyi All rights reserved ABSTRACT Learning from cadherin structures and sequences: affinity determinants and protein architecture Klara Felsovalyi Cadherins are a family of cell-surface proteins mediating adhesion that are important in development and maintenance of tissues. The family is defined by the repeating cadherin domain (EC) in their extracellular region, but they are diverse in terms of protein size, architecture and cellular function. The best-understood subfamily is the type I classical cadherins, which are found in vertebrates and have five EC domains. Among the five different type I classical cadherins, the binding interactions are highly specific in their homo- and heterophilic binding affinities, though their sequences are very similar. As previously shown, E- and N-cadherins, two prototypic members of the subfamily, differ in their homophilic K D by about an order of magnitude, while their heterophilic affinity is intermediate. To examine the source of the binding affinity differences among type I cadherins, we used crystal structures, analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies. Phylogenetic analysis and binding affinity behavior show that the type I cadherins can be further divided into two subgroups, with E- and N-cadherin representing each. In addition to the affinity differences in their wild-type binding through the strand-swapped interface, a second interface also shows an affinity difference between E- and N-cadherin.
    [Show full text]
  • L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule in Cancer, a Systematic Review on Domain-Specific Functions
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule in Cancer, a Systematic Review on Domain-Specific Functions Miriam van der Maten 1,2, Casper Reijnen 1,3, Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg 1,* and Mirjam M. Zegers 2,* 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2 Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.M.A.P); [email protected] (M.M.Z.) Received: 24 June 2019; Accepted: 23 August 2019; Published: 26 August 2019 Abstract: L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is a glycoprotein involved in cancer development and is associated with metastases and poor prognosis. Cellular processing of L1CAM results in expression of either full-length or cleaved forms of the protein. The different forms of L1CAM may localize at the plasma membrane as a transmembrane protein, or in the intra- or extracellular environment as cleaved or exosomal forms. Here, we systematically analyze available literature that directly relates to L1CAM domains and associated signaling pathways in cancer. Specifically, we chart its domain-specific functions in relation to cancer progression, and outline pre-clinical assays used to assess L1CAM. It is found that full-length L1CAM has both intracellular and extracellular targets, including interactions with integrins, and linkage with ezrin. Cellular processing leading to proteolytic cleavage and/or exosome formation results in extracellular soluble forms of L1CAM that may act through similar mechanisms as compared to full-length L1CAM, such as integrin-dependent signals, but also through distinct mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Neuron-Specific L1-CAM
    4160 Biochemistry 2008, 47, 4160–4168 Characterization of the Neuron-Specific L1-CAM Cytoplasmic Tail: Naturally Disordered in Solution It Exercises Different Binding Modes for Different Adaptor Proteins† Sergiy Tyukhtenko,‡ Lalit Deshmukh,‡ Vineet Kumar,‡ Jeffrey Lary,§ James Cole,| Vance Lemmon,⊥ and Olga Vinogradova*,‡ Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, and Biotechnology Center, UniVersity of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and Neurological Surgery, UniVersity of Miami, Miami, Florida 33136 ReceiVed December 13, 2007; ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed February 11, 2008 ABSTRACT: L1, a highly conserved transmembrane glycoprotein member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of cell adhesion molecules, mediates many developmental processes in the nervous system. Here we present the biophysical characterization and the binding properties of the least structurally defined part of this receptor: its cytoplasmic tail (CT). We have shown by analytical ultracentrifugation and dynamic light scattering experiments that it is mostly monomeric and unstructured in aqueous solution. We have defined by nuclear magnetic resonance the molecular details of L1-CT binding to two major targets: a membrane-cytoskeletal linker (MCL), ezrin, and an endocytosis mediator, AP2. Surprisingly, in addition to the two previously identified ezrin binding motifs, the juxtamembrane and the 1176YRSLE regions, we have discovered a third one, a part of which has been previously associated with binding to another MCL, ankyrin. For the L1 interaction with AP2 we have determined the precise interaction region surrounding the 1176YRSLE binding site and that this overlaps with the second ezrin binding site. In addition, we have shown that the juxtamembrane region of L1-CT has some binding affinity to AP2-µ2, although the specificity of this interaction needs further investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • 158273472.Pdf
    ANNUAL .2003REPCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY .1; ANNUAL REPORT 2003 © 2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory One Bungtown Road Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724 Web Site: www.cshl.edu Managing Editors Jeff Picarello, Lisa Becker Production Editor Rena Steuer Copy Editor Dorothy Brown Development Manager Jan Argentine Project Coordinators Maria Falasca, Nora Rice Production Manager Denise Weiss Desktop Editor Susan Schaefer Nonscientific Photography Miriam Chua, Bill Geddes Cover Designer Denise Weiss Book Designer Emily Harste Front cover: McClintock Laboratory (right) and Carnegie Library (left) (photos by Miriam Chua) Back cover: Magnolia Kobus on grounds of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (photo by Bruce Stillman) Section title pages: Miriam Chua Contents Officers of the Corporation/Board of Trusteesiv-v Governancevi Committees vii Edwin Marks (1926-2003) viii PRESIDENT'S REPORT Highlights5 CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER'S REPORT 25 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE DOUBLE HELIX 29 RESEARCH 47 Cancer: Gene Expression 49 Cancer: Genetics 74 Cancer: Cell Biology 106 Bioinformatics and Genomics 134 Neuroscience152 Plant Development and Genetics 199 CSHL Fellows 212 Author Index 217 WATSON SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 219 Dean's Report 221 Courses 238 Undergraduate Research Program245 Partners for the Future 248 Nature Study 249 COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY MEETINGS AND COURSES 251 Academic Affairs253 Symposium on Quantitative Biology 255 Meetings 258 Postgraduate Courses295 Seminars 353 BANBURY CENTER 355 Director's Report357 Meetings 365 DOLAN DNA LEARNING CENTER 403 Director's Report 405 Workshops, Meetings, and Collaborations 418 COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY PRESS 425 Publications 426 Executive Director's Report 427 FINANCE 431 History of the CSHL Endowment 433 Financial Statements 444 Financial Support448 Grants448 Institutional Advancement 457 Capital and Program Contributions 458 Watson School of Biological Sciences Capital Campaign 459 Annual Contributions 460 LABORATORY STAFF 474 III Officers of the Corporation William R.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of L1 Protein Correlates with Cluster of Differentiation 24 and Integrin Β1 Expression in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS 9: 2595-2602, 2015 Expression of L1 protein correlates with cluster of differentiation 24 and integrin β1 expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors YUE DU1*, HAIHONG ZHANG1*, ZHONGMIN JIANG2, GUOWEI HUANG1, WENLI LU1 and HESHENG WANG1 1Department of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070; 2Department of Pathology, Tianjin Fifth Central Hospital, Tianjin 300450, P.R. China Received September 9, 2014; Accepted January 29, 2015 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3096 Abstract. The present study examined 66 cases of gastroin- Introduction testinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 20 cases of smooth muscle tumors, 20 cases of schwannomas and 20 cases of normal Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common gastric tissues in order to analyze the expression of L1, cluster type of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor (GIMT), and can of differentiation (CD)24 and integrin β1 by immunohisto- be classified as being of spindle, epithelioid or mixed cell type chemical staining. Patients were subjected to follow-up, and based on morphology (1). Recent studies have identified that a survival data were evaluated. L1 expression was detected in gain-of-function mutation in the c-kit gene can be found in 95% 57.6% of GIST cases; this was a significantly higher percentage of GIST cases. This mutation facilitates ligand-independent compared with that found in the smooth muscle tumor cases activation of the tyrosine kinase function of KIT [also known or the normal control group. CD24 and integrin β1 were also as cluster of differentiation (CD)117] and can be used to aid the expressed at significantly higher levels in the GIST cases than diagnosis of GISTs (2,3).
    [Show full text]
  • Human/Mouse L1CAM Antibody
    Human/Mouse L1CAM Antibody Monoclonal Mouse IgG1 Clone # 84307 Catalog Number: MAB7772 DESCRIPTION Species Reactivity Human/Mouse Specificity Detects human/mouse L1CAM in direct ELISAs. Source Monoclonal Mouse IgG1 Clone # 84307 Purification Protein A or G purified from ascites Immunogen Mouse myeloma cell line NS0-derived recombinant human/mouse L1CAM Met1-Glu1120 Accession # CAA42508 Formulation Lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution in PBS with Trehalose. See Certificate of Analysis for details. *Small pack size (-SP) is supplied either lyophilized or as a 0.2 μm filtered solution in PBS. APPLICATIONS Please Note: Optimal dilutions should be determined by each laboratory for each application. General Protocols are available in the Technical Information section on our website. Recommended Sample Concentration Flow Cytometry 0.25 µg/106 cells See Below CyTOF-ready Ready to be labeled using established conjugation methods. No BSA or other carrier proteins that could interfere with conjugation. DATA Flow Cytometry Detection of L1CAM in HeLa human cell line. HeLa human cell line was stained with Mouse Anti-Human/Mouse L1CAM Monoclonal Antibody (Catalog # MAB7772, filled histogram) or isotype control antibody (Catalog # MAB002, open histogram), followed by Phycoerythrin-conjugated Anti- Mouse IgG Secondary Antibody (Catalog # F0102B).View our protocol for Staining Membrane-associated Proteins. PREPARATION AND STORAGE Reconstitution Reconstitute at 0.5 mg/mL in sterile PBS. Shipping The product is shipped at ambient temperature. Upon receipt, store it immediately at the temperature recommended below. *Small pack size (-SP) is shipped with polar packs. Upon receipt, store it immediately at -20 to -70 °C Stability & Storage Use a manual defrost freezer and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • L1 (CD171) Is Highly Expressed in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    Modern Pathology (2006) 19, 399–406 & 2006 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/06 $30.00 www.modernpathology.org L1 (CD171) is highly expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors Jussuf T Kaifi1, Andrea Strelow1, Paulus G Schurr1, Uta Reichelt2, Emre F Yekebas1, Robin Wachowiak1, Alexander Quaas2, Tim Strate1, Hansjoerg Schaefer2, Guido Sauter2, Melitta Schachner3 and Jakob R Izbicki1 1Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2Institute for Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany and 3Center for Molecular Neurobiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany The treatment strategy for mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract is based upon typing of the tumor. Especially differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) to leiomyomas is crucial for determining radicality of surgery. L1 cell adhesion molecule (CD171) plays an essential role in tumor progression. The aim of this study was to determine expression of L1 in GISTs, smooth muscle tumors, desmoid-type fibromatosis and peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs). We retrospectively analyzed a total of 129 surgically resected primary tumors or metastases of 72 GISTs, 29 smooth muscle tumors, seven PNSTs and 21 desmoid-type fibromatosis by immunohistochemistry for c-kit, CD34, smooth muscle actin, desmin, vimentin, S-100 and L1 expression. L1 expression was detected in 53 (74%) of 72 GISTs but in none of 29 smooth muscle tumors or 21 desmoid-type fibromatosis (Po0.01 by Fisher’s test). In all, four (57%) of seven peripheral nerve sheath tumors were L1-positive. Survival analysis of 55 surgically completely resected GISTs presenting without metastasis at initial diagnosis revealed no tumor-specific death among L1-negative patients (P ¼ 0.13 by log-rank test; median follow-up time 41 months) and one recurrence was observed (P ¼ 0.12).
    [Show full text]
  • Association of CSF Proteins with Tau and Amyloid Β Levels In
    Remnestål et al. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy (2021) 13:54 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00789-5 RESEARCH Open Access Association of CSF proteins with tau and amyloid β levels in asymptomatic 70-year- olds Julia Remnestål1, Sofia Bergström1, Jennie Olofsson1, Evelina Sjöstedt1,2, Mathias Uhlén1,2, Kaj Blennow3,4, Henrik Zetterberg3,4,5,6, Anna Zettergren3,7, Silke Kern3,7,8, Ingmar Skoog3,7,8, Peter Nilsson1 and Anna Månberg1* Abstract Background: Increased knowledge of the evolution of molecular changes in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is important for the understanding of disease pathophysiology and also crucial to be able to identify and validate disease biomarkers. While several biological changes that occur early in the disease development have already been recognized, the need for further characterization of the pathophysiological mechanisms behind AD still remains. Methods: In this study, we investigated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of 104 proteins in 307 asymptomatic 70-year- olds from the H70 Gothenburg Birth Cohort Studies using a multiplexed antibody- and bead-based technology. Results: The protein levels were first correlated with the core AD CSF biomarker concentrations of total tau, phospho- tau and amyloid beta (Aβ42) in all individuals. Sixty-three proteins showed significant correlations to either total tau, phospho-tau or Aβ42. Thereafter, individuals were divided based on CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score to determine if early changes in pathology and cognition had an effect on the correlations. We compared the associations of the analysed proteins with CSF markers between groups and found 33 proteins displaying significantly different associations for amyloid-positive individuals and amyloid-negative individuals, as defined by the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • Specification of Synaptic Connectivity by Cell Surface Interactions
    REVIEWS Specification of synaptic connectivity by cell surface interactions Joris de Wit1 and Anirvan Ghosh2 Abstract | The molecular diversification of cell surface molecules has long been postulated to impart specific surface identities on neuronal cell types. The existence of unique cell surface identities would allow neurons to distinguish one another and connect with their appropriate target cells. Although progress has been made in identifying cell type-specific surface molecule repertoires and in characterizing their extracellular interactions, determining how this molecular diversity contributes to the precise wiring of neural circuitry has proven challenging. Here, we review the role of the cadherin, neurexin, immunoglobulin and leucine-rich repeat protein superfamilies in the specification of connectivity. The emerging evidence suggests that the concerted actions of these proteins may critically contribute to the assembly of neural circuits. Axon initial segment A hallmark of CNS organization is the highly precise pat- The molecular mechanisms that regulate wiring A specialized subcellular tern of connectivity between neurons. The location of a specificity and synaptic diversity in the vertebrate brain compartment in the first part synapse on a target cell and its distinctive structural and are only beginning to be understood. Classic work from of the axon that contains high 2 3 concentrations of channels, functional properties are key factors in determining the Langley and Sperry on the regeneration of nerve fibres scaffolding proteins and flow of information in a neural circuit. in the mature nervous system indicated that neurons adhesion molecules and that The nervous system uses many mechanisms to can rewire with remarkable specificity. Their work sug- initiates action potentials.
    [Show full text]
  • L1-Mediated Colon Cancer Cell Metastasis Does Not Require Changes in EMT and Cancer Stem Cell Markers
    Published OnlineFirst December 1, 2010; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0406 Molecular Cancer Angiogenesis, Metastasis, and the Cellular Microenvironment Research L1-Mediated Colon Cancer Cell Metastasis Does Not Require Changes in EMT and Cancer Stem Cell Markers Nancy Gavert1, Alessia Vivanti1, John Hazin1, Thomas Brabletz2, and Avri Ben-Ze’ev1 Abstract Aberrant activation of Wnt/b-catenin signaling is common in most sporadic and inherited colorectal cancer (CRC) cells leading to elevated b-catenin/TCF transactivation. We previously identified the neural cell adhesion molecule L1 as a target gene of b-catenin/TCF in CRC cells. Forced expression of L1 confers increased cell motility, invasion, and tumorigenesis, and the induction of human CRC cell metastasis to the liver. In human CRC tissue, L1 is exclusively localized at the invasive front of such tumors in a subpopulation of cells displaying nuclear b-catenin. We determined whether L1 expression confers metastatic capacities by inducing an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and whether L1 cosegregates with cancer stem cell (CSC) markers. We found that changes in L1 levels do not affect the organization or expression of E-cadherin in cell lines, or in invading CRC tissue cells, and no changes in other epithelial or mesenchymal markers were detected after L1 transfection. The introduction of major EMT regulators (Slug and Twist) into CRC cell lines reduced the levels of E-cadherin and induced fibronectin and vimentin, but unlike L1, Slug and Twist expression was insufficient for conferring metastasis. In CRC cells L1 did not specifically cosegregate with CSC markers including CD133, CD44, and EpCAM.
    [Show full text]