DOCSLIB.ORG

Steven Horwitz's CV September 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Steven Horwitz's CV September 2009 http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/Vitae/cvlatest.htm CURRICULUM VITAE Steven G. Horwitz Charles A. Dana Professor of Economics Department of Economics St. Lawrence University Canton, NY 13617 TEL (315) 229-5731 FAX (315) 229-5819 EMAIL [email protected] WEB: http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz HOME ADDRESS: 126 Pike Road Canton, NY 13617 (315) 379-9737 EDUCATION: Ph. D. 1990 George Mason University. Doctor of Philosophy in Economics. M. A. 1987 George Mason University. Master of Arts in Economics. A. B. 1985 The University of Michigan. “With distinction” in Economics and Philosophy. ACADEMIC WORK EXPERIENCE: 8/89 - St. Lawrence University, Department of Economics. Charles A. Dana Professor of Economics (5/07 - ) Professor of Economics (7/02 - ) Associate Professor of Economics (9/95 – 6/02). Flora Irene Eggleston Faculty Chair (7/93 – 6/98). Assistant Professor and Dana Fellow (8/89 - 8/95). 7/07 – 9/07 Social Philosophy and Policy Center, Bowling Green State University. Visiting Scholar. 5/01 - 7/07 St. Lawrence University, Associate Dean of the First Year Responsible for all aspects of the University's First-Year Program/First-Year Seminar academic programs. Work in conjunction with the Director of Residential Learning Communities and the Student Life team to coordinate the residential portion of the program, including New Student Orientation. Specific responsibilities include faculty recruitment, development, and evaluation, curriculum development and evaluation, further integrating first year academic and student life, developing and administering budgets, and representing the FYP/FYS in University planning, external relations, and 1 of 19 11/25/09 12:27 PM Steven Horwitz's CV September 2009 http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/Vitae/cvlatest.htm development. 7/03 – 6/04 St. Lawrence University, Interim Director, Center for Teaching and Learning. Responsible for the organization, execution and oversight of all programs sponsored under the auspices of the Center for Teaching and Learning, with the intent of advancing and responding to the professional dialogue on teaching and learning on campus; staying abreast of current teaching issues, pedagogical methods and innovations in higher education; and developing partnerships with academic departments and programs and instructional technology. Specific responsibilities include new faculty orientation and the faculty mentor program, allocating travel funds for pedagogy conferences and small grants for teaching innovations, and other administrative, budgetary, and supervisory activities. 9/88 - 6/89 George Mason University, Department of Economics. Acting Assistant Professor of Economics. PRIMARY FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION AND INTEREST: Economics of Gender and the Family, Austrian Economics, the Social Thought of F. A. Hayek, and Political Economy. OTHER AREAS OF INTEREST: Monetary Theory and History, History of Economic Thought and Methodology, American Economic History, Macroeconomics, Public Choice, and the Evolution of Social Institutions. SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS: Books: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective, New York: Routledge, 2000. (ISBN 0-415-19762-7, part of the series Foundations of the Market Process, edited by Lawrence H. White and Mario J. Rizzo). Co-winner of the 2001 Smith Prize in Austrian Economics, for the best contribution to Austrian economics in the previous three years. Monetary Evolution, Free Banking, and Economic Order, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992. (ISBN 0-8133-8514-8, part of the series Studies in the History, Methods, and Boundaries of Economics, edited by Axel Leijonhufvud and Donald McCloskey). Volumes Edited: Advances in Austrian Economics, volume 4, (with Peter J. Boettke), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1997. 2 of 19 11/25/09 12:27 PM Steven Horwitz's CV September 2009 http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/Vitae/cvlatest.htm Monographs: 'Of Human Action but not Human Design': Liberalism in the Tradition of the Scottish Enlightenment, 1999 Annual Frank P. Piskor Lecture, Canton, NY: St. Lawrence University, 2000. Peer-Reviewed Articles: “The Role of Ideal Types in Austrian Business Cycle Theory” (with Gene Callahan), Advances in Austrian Economics, 13, 2010, forthcoming (invited contribution). “I’m not a ‘Neuro-Hayekian,’ I’m a Subjectivist,” Advances in Austrian Economics, 12, 2010, forthcoming (invited reply). “The Sensory Order and Organizational Learning,” Advances in Austrian Economics, 12, 2010, forthcoming (invited contribution). “Great Apprehensions, Prolonged Depression: Gauti Eggertsson on the 1930s,” Econ Journal Watch, 6 (3), September 2009: 313-36 (invited contribution). “Best Responders: Post-Katrina Innovation and Improvisation by Wal-Mart and the U.S. Coast Guard,” Innovations, 4 (2), Spring 2009, pp. 93-99 (invited contribution). “Wal-Mart to the Rescue: Private Enterprise’s Response to Hurricane Katrina,” The Independent Review, 13 (4), Spring 2009, pp. 511-28. “Is the Family a Spontaneous Order?” Studies in Emergent Order, 1, 2008 (invited contribution). “Three Contemporary Economic Myths About Income and Material Well-Being,” educational note, Journal of Private Enterprise, 24 (1), Fall 2008, pp. 131-44 (invited contribution). “Analogous Models of Complexity: The Austrian Theory of Capital and Hayek's Theory of Cognition as Adaptive Classifying Systems,”Explorations in Austrian Economics, Roger Koppl, ed., volume 11 of Advances in Austrian Economics, 2008, pp. 143-66 (invited contribution). “Monetary Calculation and the Extension of Social Cooperation into Anonymity,” Journal of Private Enterprise Education, 23 (2), Spring 2008, pp. 81-93. “Heterogeneous Human Capital, Uncertainty, and the Structure of Plans: A Market Process Approach to Marriage and Divorce” (with Peter Lewin), Review of Austrian Economics, 21 (1), March 2008, pp. 1-21. “The Limits of Economic Expertise: Prophets, Engineers, and the State in the History of Development Economics,” (with Peter J. Boettke), History of Political Economy, 37 (1), annual conference volume supplement, 2005, pp. 10-39 (invited contribution). 3 of 19 11/25/09 12:27 PM Steven Horwitz's CV September 2009 http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/Vitae/cvlatest.htm “The Functions of the Family in the Great Society,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29 (5), September 2005, pp. 669-84. “Two Worlds at Once: Rand, Hayek, and the Ethics of the Micro and Macro-cosmos,” Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, 6 (2), Spring 2005, pp. 375-403 (invited contribution as part of a symposium on “Ayn Rand Among the Austrians”). “Monetary Calculation and the Unintended Extended Order: The Misesian Microfoundations of the Hayekian Great Society,” Review of Austrian Economics, 17 (4), December 2004, pp. 307-21. “Money and the Interpretive Turn: Some Considerations,” Symposium, 8 (2), Summer 2004, pp. 249-66 (invited contribution for a special issue in honor of G. B. Madison). “Rand, Rush, and De-totalizing the Utopianism of Progressive Rock,” Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, 5 (1), Fall 2003, pp. 161-72 (invited contribution). “The Costs of Inflation Revisited,” Review of Austrian Economics, 16 (1), March 2003, pp. 77-95. “Comment on Boettke & Subrick and Faulkner,” (symposium on John Searle's philosophy and economics) Journal of Economic Methodology, 9 (1), March 2002, pp. 81-86 (invited comment). “Entrepreneurship, Exogenous Change, and the Flexibility of Capital,” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 12 (1), March 2002, pp. 67-77 (invited submission for an issue in honor of Israel Kirzner). “From Smith to Menger to Hayek: Liberalism in the Spontaneous Order Tradition,” The Independent Review, 6 (1), Summer 2001, pp 81-97. Reprinted in The Challenge of Liberty: Classical Liberalism Today, Robert Higgs and Carl Close, eds., Oakland: Independent Institute, 2006. “From The Sensory Order to the Liberal Order: Hayek's Non-rationalist Liberalism,” Review of Austrian Economics, 13 (1), March 2000, pp. 23-40. “Keynes and Capitalism One More Time: A Further Reply to Hill,” Critical Review, 12 (1/2), Winter-Spring 1998, pp. 95-111 (invited reply). “Monetary Calculation and Mises's Critique of Planning,” History of Political Economy, 30 (3), Fall 1998, pp. 427-50. “Labor Market Coordination and Monetary Equilibrium: W. H. Hutt's Place in 'Pre-Keynesian' Macro,” Journal of Labor Research, 18 (2), Spring 1997, pp. 205-26 (invited submission). “Reply to Cottrell,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 18 (2), Fall 1996, pp. 314-318. 4 of 19 11/25/09 12:27 PM Steven Horwitz's CV September 2009 http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/Vitae/cvlatest.htm “Capital Theory, Inflation, and Deflation: The Austrians and Monetary Disequilibrium Theory Compared,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 18 (2), Fall 1996, pp.287-308. Reprinted in The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek, Vol III: Economics, Peter J. Boettke, ed., Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar, 2000. “Keynes on Capitalism: Reply to Hill,” Critical Review, 10 (3), Summer 1996, pp. 353-72 (invited submission). “Money, Money Prices, and the Socialist Calculation Debate,” Advances in Austrian Economics, 3, 1996, pp. 59-77. Reprinted in Socialism and the Market: The Socialist Calculation Debate Revisited, Vol. IX, Peter J. Boettke, ed., New York: Routledge, 2000. “Feminist Economics: An Austrian Perspective,” Journal of Economic Methodology, 2 (2), December 1995, pp. 259-279. “A Property Rights Approach to Free Banking,” (with Howard Bodenhorn), Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 5 (4), December 1994, pp. 505-519. “Systemic
Recommended publications
  • The Region, Vol

    The Region, Vol

    Henry Parker Willis and the Location of the Federal Reserve Districts and the Headquarter Cities By David Hammes, Professor of Economics, University of Hawaii-Hilo 200 W. Kawili Street, Hilo, HI 96720-4091 [email protected] The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 called for dividing the USA into eight to twelve separate Reserve districts to help provide regional and national economic stability. The Committee responsible for designating the districts and headquarter cities made its decision public on April 2, 1914. Since that time, suspicion has been that political influences determined both the number and location of the reserve bank districts and cities. Based on the writings of Henry Parker Willis (1874 – 1937), this paper outlines the process used in 1914 to determine the number and locations of reserve districts and banks. Introduction1 The framers of the Federal Reserve System intended each of the Federal Reserve district banks to play a significant role in regional economic stability. Given changes in legislation (e.g. the Federal Reserve Act of 1935), and the greater mobility of capital, people, and information through time, monetary policy has been centralized in the Board of Governors and 2 Federal Open Market Committee. Public interest in the System has naturally followed the policy-power shift to the Board in Washington, DC. Interest today in the Reserve district banks is often limited to questions such as: ‘Why are there two Federal Reserve banks in the state of Missouri?’ and/or ‘Why are there so many reserve bank cities in the east versus the west?’ Following early commentary the answers are usually attributed to ‘politics’.
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today

    Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today

    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
  • 41042 FEE Text+1

    41042 FEE Text+1

    VOLUME 59, NO 7 SEPTEMBER 2009 Features 8 Human Action, 1949: A Dramatic Episode in Intellectual History by Israel M. Kirzner 12 Human Action: The 60th Anniversary by Bettina Bien Greaves 16 Human Action: The Treatise in Economics by Peter Boettke 19 What Human Action Has Meant to Me: Reflections of a Young Economist by Peter T.Leeson 22 The Case for Capitalism by Henry Hazlitt 28 A Triple Whammy for Austrian Economics by Sanford Ikeda 31 In Defense of Ideology by Mario J. Rizzo 34 Transforming America: The Bush-Obama Stimulus Programs by Randall G. Holcombe Page 16 39 The Myth of Unregulated Tobacco by Bruce Yandle Columns 4 Ideas and Consequences ~ In the Grip of Madness by Lawrence W.Reed 26 Our Economic Past ~ The Rise of Big Business and the Growth of Government by Robert Higgs 42 Give Me a Break! ~ Competition Would Save Medicine, Too by John Stossel 55 The Pursuit of Happiness ~ EFCA and Compromise by Charles W.Baird Page 26 Departments 2 Perspective ~ Human Action as a Work of Art by Sheldon Richman 6 Saving Is Killing the Economy? It Just Ain’t So! by Steven Horwitz 44 Capital Letters Book Reviews 50 New Deal or Raw Deal? How FDR’s Economic Legacy Has Damaged America by Burton Folsom, Jr. Reviewed by Robert Higgs 51 The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives by Michael Heller Reviewed by Art Carden 52 The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Global Economics by Craig Hovey with Gregory Rehmke Reviewed by George C.
  • 1 Financial and Monetary History of the United States 1700 to 1933

    1 Financial and Monetary History of the United States 1700 to 1933

    Financial and Monetary History of the United States 1700 to 1933 Economics 344:01 (Fall 2012) Monday/Thursday 11:30-12:50 Murray 211 Professor Michael D. Bordo Department of Economics New Jersey Hall, Room 304 Rutgers University (732) 932-7363 [email protected] http://econweb.rutgers.edu/bordo Office hours: Mondays 11-12 and Thursday 11-12 or by appointment Prerequisites Econ 320 (Intermediate Microeconomic Analysis) and Econ 321 (Intermediate Macroeconomic Analysis). Money and Banking Econ 301 is recommended. This is an upper level elective course where you are expected to apply the knowledge and expertise that you have gained in the prerequisites. Course Objective The focus of the course is on American Monetary and Financial history. The methodology of the course is to apply modern tools of monetary and macroeconomic theory to important historical issues. The introduction of theoretical tools and historical data can shed new light on controversies of the past and yield new insights for today’s economic problems. Attendance Policy and Academic Integrity Students are expected to attend every class. Attendance is highly correlated with performance in the course. As this is an upper level class I will not take attendance. It is the student’s responsibility to master the course work including the lectures and the readings. As always at Rutgers, you are expected to follow the University’s precepts of academic integrity. ( See http://academicintegrity.rutgers.edu/integrity.shtml). Course Requirements There will be a short research paper of maximum 12 pages, double-spaced including references, tables and figures worth 40% of the grade.
  • Economics 313: Money and Banking Section 101 Fall Semester, 2016 Towson University

    Economics 313: Money and Banking Section 101 Fall Semester, 2016 Towson University

    Economics 313: Money and Banking Section 101 Fall Semester, 2016 Towson University Description / Online logistics / Grading Requirements / Academic integrity / Course outline Instructor: Howard Baetjer, Jr., Lecturer, Department of Economics Office: Stephens 104B (access it via the Accounting Department office, ST104) Phone: Office: (410)-704-2585 Home: (410)-435-2664 (No calls after 9:00 p.m., please) Email: [email protected] Website: http://wp.towson.edu/baetjer/ Office hours: Mondays and Wednesdays, 3:30 – 5:00, and by appointment Required Texts and readings: 1. George Selgin, The Theory of Free Banking, available online at http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php&title=23 07 and in a photocopy packet at the university bookstore. You must bring hard copy with you for class discussions, so print it yourself or purchase the packet. 2. Lawrence White, The Theory of Monetary Institutions 3. Articles and book chapters in two photocopy packets available only at the bookstore. The first packet should be available at the beginning of the term, the second at some later time to be announced. 4. Additional readings may be distributed in class or made available through our Blackboard site. 5. Alt-M blog. Subscribe (for free) at http://www.alt-m.org/; read the posts as they come in. Recommended Reading: The Wall Street Journal. A great way to keep up with current economic news and to improve your ability to apply economic theory to the real world. Students may subscribe online at http://WSJstudent.com at special low rates for students. I may assign WSJ articles from time to time, but you’ll be able to go read them in the library if you would prefer not to pay for a subscription.
  • A Review Essay on Roger Garrison's Time and Money Ryan D. Oprea

    A Review Essay on Roger Garrison's Time and Money Ryan D. Oprea

    Institutions, Emergence, and Macro Theorizing: A Review Essay on Roger Garrison’s Time and Money Ryan D. Oprea George Mason University [email protected] and Richard E. Wagner George Mason University [email protected] Proofs and Queries to: Richard E. Wagner Department of Economics 3G4 George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030 703-993-1132 Institutions, Emergence, and Macro Theorizing: A Review Essay on Roger Garrison’s Time and Money In the mid-1930s, the approach to macro phenomena associated with Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek figured prominently in the macro analytics of the time, as noted in the contemporary surveys by Alec Macfie (1934) and Gottfried Haberler (1937). Within two decades, however, the Mises-Hayek formulation had disappeared from the analytical radar screens of macro theorists. This disappearance, moreover, cannot be attributed to any kind of gross explanatory failure on the part of that framework relative to the other frameworks that were present. The Mises-Hayek framework predicted the eventual bust of the inflationary boom of the 1920s, as Murray Rothbard (1963) explains. The severity of the Great Depression, moreover, can be generally reconciled with the Mises-Hayek framework. Among the means for doing this are to take into account the secondary deflation that was set in motion by the initial contraction and the negative supply-side shocks that were generated by the Hoover- Roosevelt efforts to socialize or syndicalize large segments of the American economy. 1 Garrison’s central claim in Time and Money is that the state of macro theorizing lost valuable insights and sources of influence with the disappearance of the Mises-Hayek orientation toward macro theorizing.
  • Peter J. Boettke

    Peter J. Boettke

    PETER J. BOETTKE BB&T Professor for the Study of Capitalism, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, & University Professor of Economics and Philosophy Department of Economics, MSN 3G4 George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030 Tel: 703-993-1149 Fax: 703-993-1133 Web: http://www.peter-boettke.com http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=182652 http://www.coordinationproblem.org PERSONAL Date of birth: January 3, 1960 Nationality: United States EDUCATION Ph.D. in Economics, George Mason University, January, 1989 M.A. in Economics, George Mason University, January, 1987 B.A. in Economics, Grove City College, May, 1983 TITLE OF DOCTORAL THESIS: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism, 1918-1928 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Academic Positions 1987 –88 Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University 1988 –90 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, School of Business Administration, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309 1990 –97 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, New York University, New York, NY 10003 1997 –98 Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Finance, School of Business, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471 1998 – 2003 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030 (tenured Fall 2000) 2003 –07 Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030 2007 – University Professor, George Mason University 2011 – Affiliate Faculty, Department of Philosophy, George Mason University FIELDS OF INTEREST
  • Createspace Word Templates

    Createspace Word Templates

    MOLINARI REVIEW Molinari Review 1, No. 2 (Fall 2019) © The Molinari Institute 2019 All content in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by: The Molinari Institute 402 Martin Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36830 U.S.A. ISBN: 978-1-947236-00-4 MOLINARI REVIEW The Molinari Review is a peer-reviewed, open-access, print-on-demand, interdiscipli- nary journal of libertarian research. We publish scholarship, sympathetic or critical, in and/or on the libertarian tradition, broadly understood as including classical liberalism, individualist anarchism, social anarchism, anarcho-capitalism, anarcho- communism, anarcho-syndicalism, anarcha-feminism, panarchism, voluntaryism, mu- tualism, agorism, distributism, bleeding-heart libertarianism, Austrianism, Georgism, public choice, and beyond – essentially, everything from Emma Goldman to Ayn Rand, C. L. R. James to F. A. Hayek, Alexis de Tocqueville to Michel Foucault. (We see exciting affiliations among these strands of the libertarian tradition; but you don’t have to agree with us about that to publish in our pages.) Disciplines in which we seek to publish include philosophy, political science, eco- nomics, history, sociology, psychology, anthropology, theology, ecology, literature, and law. We aim to enhance the visibility of libertarian scholarship, to expand the boundaries of traditional libertarian discussion, and to provide a home for cutting- edge research in the theory and practice of human liberty. INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Submissions should be sent by email to Roderick T. Long at [email protected] as Word .doc or .docx files, prepared for blind review (i.e. all author information re- moved), and accompanied by an abstract of around 150 words as a guide for referees.
  • Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process

    Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process

    Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XXXV (March 1997), pp. 60-85 EntrepreneurialDiscovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach ISRAEL M. KIRZNER New York University The aiithloris deeply grateful to Mario Rizzo, Peter Boettke, andc1Yat Nyarko, for exte.tsive and helpful comm7ents o an earlier draft Firther helpful coniiiiienit.swere provided by Joseph T Salernio,and by othieriaiemiibers of the AiustrianiEconomizics Colloquiumi71 at New York Univer- Oity.Several anioniymtouisreferee.s provided m1anzyadditionial valiuable suggestions. The auithlor is gr-atefiulto the Sarah Scaife Foundation for researchisupport. I stream economics. This paper sets forth the outlines of one important approach THE AUSTRIAN TRADITION is repre- within modern Austrian economics, an sented in modern economics by a approach offering a perspective on mi- "very vocal, feisty and dedicated subset croeconomic theory which (while it has of the economics profession" (Karen generated a considerable literature of its Vaughn 1994, p. xi). Much of the work of own) is not ordinarily well-represented this group of scholars is devoted to the either at the (mainstream) textbook most fundamental problems of micro- level, or in the (mainstream) journal lit- economics.1 This Austrian work, there- erature. Although the author subscribes fore, differs in character and content to and has contributed to this from a good deal of neoclassical theory approach, the purpose of this paper is exposition, which, despite widespread and growing not advocacy. References in the paper awareness of its limitations, continues to to criticisms of mainstream microeco- serve as the analytical core of main- nomics which have been discussed in the Austrian literature should be understood 1 The emphasis here on microeconomics ex- here not as arguments in favor of the presses the focus of the present paper, not the Austrian approach, but as clues that may scope of modern Austrian economics.
  • Textbooks and Pure Fiscal Policy: the Neglect of Monetary Basics

    Textbooks and Pure Fiscal Policy: the Neglect of Monetary Basics

    Econ Journal Watch, Volume 4, Number 1, January 2007, pp 60-70. Textbooks and Pure Fiscal Policy: The Neglect of Monetary Basics LEE C. SPECTOR AND T. NORMAN VAN COTT * ABSTRACT AGGREGATE DEMAND CANNOT CHANGE WITHOUT THE CONCOMITANT support of the monetary sector. At the initial level of output, either the money supply must change, the demand for money change, or the quantity of money demanded change. The link between money demand and money velocity means that changes in the demand for money and quantity of money demanded correspond to exogenous and endogenous changes in the velocity of money at the initial level of output. In any event, absent the support of the monetary sector, aggregate demand does not change. End of story. 1 One would hope that macroeconomic discussions of fiscal policy would utilize such monetary basics. Unfortunately, most leading textbooks in macro and monetary economics do not elucidate the monetary mechanisms crucial to understanding the effects of fiscal policy. Indeed, one must go back at least thirty years to find textbook discussions that do * Department of Economics, Ball State University. Muncie, IN 47306. The authors thank Milton Friedman and Richard Timberlake for their encouraging comments on a previous version of this paper. 1 At the initial level of output, endogenous changes in the quantity of money demanded or velocity can occur as a result of a change in the interest rate. Moreover, endogenous and exogenous changes in velocity at the initial level of output are probably better thought of as changes in the “desired” velocity since they stem from changes in people’s willingness to hold money.
  • From Smith to Menger to Hayek Liberalism in the Spontaneous-Order Tradition

    From Smith to Menger to Hayek Liberalism in the Spontaneous-Order Tradition

    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 From Smith to Menger to Hayek Liberalism in the Spontaneous-Order Tradition —————— ✦ —————— STEVEN HORWITZ ately, thinkers from both the political left and the political right have increas- ingly been making critical comments about the Enlightenment and the politi- Lcal liberalism normally associated with it. Many of these criticisms center around the concern that the tradition of Enlightenment liberalism portrays human beings as hyperrational or extremely atomized.
  • The Macroeconomic Models of the Austrian School: a History and Comparative Analysis Renaud Fillieule*

    The Macroeconomic Models of the Austrian School: a History and Comparative Analysis Renaud Fillieule*

    THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS VOLUME 22 | No. 4 | 533–564 | WINTER 2019 WWW.QJAE.ORG The Macroeconomic Models of the Austrian School: A History and Comparative Analysis Renaud Fillieule* JEL Classification: B13, B25, B53, E14 Abstract: This paper offers a synthetic and comparative assessment of the most basic Austrian macroeconomic models, i.e. the models that analyze the static forces determining the equilibrium interest rate and structure of production (monetary disequilibria and business cycles are not part of this investigation). The three models presented here are those of Böhm-Bawerk ([1889] 1959), Hayek (1936, 1941), and Garrison (2001). This review shows that these models are largely inconsistent with each other, but also that at a more general level they share several important charac- teristics. Finally, a tentative explanation is offered as to why there is no cumulative tradition in the Austrian School in this kind of basic macroeconomic theorizing. INTRODUCTION he Austrian School is best known for its subjectivist approach Tand for its theories of the market process and the business cycle. This paper focuses upon a less familiar but nevertheless significant * Renaud Fillieule ([email protected]) is Professor of Sociology at the University of Lille, France, and member of the CLERSÉ research unit (UMR CNRS 8019). A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the Austrian Economics Research Seminar in Paris, France, May 9, 2017. The author wishes to thank Prof. Hülsmann for this invitation and the attendees for their remarks and suggestions. Quart J Austrian Econ (2019) 22.4:533–564 533 Creative Commons https://qjae.scholasticahq.com/ BY-NC-ND 4.0 License 534 Quart J Austrian Econ (2019) 22.4:533–564 topic.