DOCSLIB.ORG

Thetouc of Transcendence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thetouc of Transcendence THETOUC OF TRANSCENDENCE A Postcolonial Theology of God MAYRA RIVERA Westminster John Knox Press LOUISVILLE • LONDON CHAPTER 1 Introduction od is transcendent!' Most theologians would agree with this state­ Gment, but what do we mean by it? At first glance, the answer seems obvious. "Transcendent" signifies that which is beyond normal physical experience, apart, above, unlimited by materiality. "Divine transcen­ dence" thus indicates God's aloftness, separation, independence, and immateriality-in short, his super/iority. These associations are indeed the most common for the term "transcendence" and the reason it has acquired the reputation of being a tool of patriarchal and imperial self­ legitimation. For decades, progressive theologians have objected to the validation of hierarchical rule that attends such a concept of the deity. Theologians have also been concerned about the ways in which allusions to transcendence tend to orient religious life away from the pursuit of social.transformation, promoting instead the individualistic aspiration to attain a positive otherworldly existence. When claimed as the basis of a superior, unquestionable knowledge owned by some, on the other hand, transcendence has often served to legitimize decidedly ungodly actions. Feminist theologians have further challenged the image of the separate immaterial God for its collusion with the subordination of women and the devastation of creation, choosing instead to emphasize the "imma­ nence" of God. While most theologies do not reject divine transcendence, the numerous suspicions about the term have not been dispelled. These well-known critiques of the notion of transcendence should not be ignored. Yet I find myself drawn to a different approach. Instead of focusing on the hierarchical and separatist images with which tran­ scendence is laden, and thus implicitly admitting them as normative, I 2 THE TOUCH OF TRANSCENDENCE INTRODUCTION 3 want to delve into an ancient intuition that lies hidden beneath these It may thus be conceived as an elaboration of Irenaeus's familiar defini­ battered images. Wary, and a bit weary, of the usual formulations for tion: "Gloria Dei vivens homo" (the glory of God is the human being fully transcendence-beyond being, beyond time, beyond creation, beyond alive). 3 This metaphor of"glory" will lure forward this entire book. What materiality-I have opted instead to being with the simple assertion that does it mean to encounter the "glory of God" in another human being? God is irreducibly Other, always beyond our grasp. But not beyond our How does it affect our conceptions of the human person and of relations touch. How we might imagine this otherness is not what this study pre­ across differences? What images of God's transcendence are conducive to sumes, but the vision the book strives to develop. This book seeks to stir relations that promote the fullness of life for all creatures? up conventional certainties and enable different understandings of The book begins by engaging the explicitly theological discourses of "transcendence" to emerge. It hopes, ultimately, to remobilize the pas­ "radical orthodoxy" theologians John Milbank and Catherine Pickstock, sion and the wisdom of a Christian love for the inappropriable divine and liberation theologian Ignacio Ellacurla. The theological insights that Other as theological resources for rethinking our relationship with arise from those engagements are then developed through a series of human others. 1 readings of the philosophical works of Emmanuel Levinas and Enrique The Touch of Transcendence offers a vision of transcendence within Dussel, the feminist contributions of Luce Irigaray, and postcolonial creation and between creatures: a relational transcendence. In order to texts by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. If this work's constructive theolog­ liberate the potential of the notion of transcendence for reconceiving ical proposal unfolds from the interaction with multiple nontheological interhuman relations, we must resist its pervasive associations with texts it is partly because the cosmology that it espouses affirms the theo­ otherworldliness. It is crucial to bring transcendence in contact with the logical significance of human relations as much as the ethical import of concrete realities of our world-where we encounter and "touch upon" theology. Its interdisciplinary approach is also a necessity dictated by the one another. "Touching upon," as feminist philosopher Luce Irigaray subject matter. The notion of transcendence has always been as much defines it, means a "touching which respects the other," that never aims philosophical as theological, bearing the traces of one discipline when it at appropriating or capturing.2 The book's title intends to highlight the appears in the other. intimacy of transcendence-a transcendence in the flesh of others whom The present engagement honors the glory of the otherness to which we touch, but may never fully grasp. transcendence testifies, even as the book seeks to release its potential for The aim of this work is theological. I seek to offer a constructive for­ promoting ethical relations. This study therefore works constructively at mulation of divine transcendence in the conviction that Christianity has the interstices between theology and theoretical discourses about the important resources for envisioning ethical relationships between human ethics of difference, where notions of transcendence and interhuman beings. Our images of the divine Other shape our constructions of otherness interweave. Although they represent different academic disci­ human otherness. An apparent structural relation exists between imagin­ itlines, all of the discourses explored in this study share the conviction ing our relation to the human Other and to God as wholly Other: God that notions of radical alterity are crucial for ethics. Through my inter­ can be perceived as an extreme instance of interhuman difference. Yet I action with them, I hope to show how alternative understandings of will further assert that the relation between human and divine otherness interhuman difference can lead to a theological reconstruction of the goes beyond the structural. Theologically God's transcendence is insepa­ idea of divine transcendence, one that can resist patriarchal and imperi­ rable from theological anthropology-that is, from theological notions of alist assumptions while affirming not only the irreducible difference of what a human being is and, as a consequence, of the meaning of inter­ God from all creatures, but the differences among creatures as well. human differences. I ground in Christian theology my affirmation that This inquiry is thus a variation on liberation and feminist engage­ the cosmos, and thus human beings, are rooted in the divine. Indeed, the ments with the doctrine of God. Like liberation theologies, including cosmos is inconceivable devoid of the divine life force. Moreover, it is feminist ones, this book places the concern for right relations with other always and only within creation that the divine Other is encountered. human beings at the center of the doctrinal discussion, refusing the dis­ Although moving toward a theological cosmology, this work focuses on junction between theology and ethics. It also builds upon feminist the­ the ways in which transcendence is encountered among human creatures. ologies' meticulous analysis of the correlation between prevalent images 4 THE TOUCH OF TRANSCENDENCE INTRODUCTION 5 of divine transcendence and patriarchal ideals. This theology shares tionship between God and creation highlights that detachment in terms feminist awareness of the power of doctrine to shape communities and that reveal the tensions with the vision espoused in this work. Jesus direct their praxis; it assents to Elizabeth Johnson's sharp refrain: "The intersects the plane of created existence "vertically, from above." Even 4 symbol of God functions." And because the symbol functions, this work that intersection is hesitant. "In the resurrection the new world of the strives to offer not only a critique of the dominant imaginary, but also an Holy Spirit touches the old world of the flesh, but touches it as a tangent alternative vision that may nurture ethical action. This vision incarnates touches a circle, that is, without touching it." 8 as a cosmology inspired by that feminist genre where theology becomes In this touch, which does not quite touch, God remains "detached" self-consciously metaphorical in its attempt to "convert" the imaginary. 5 while effecting the "dissolution of [human] distinction." Human solidar­ It nevertheless differs from those remarkable feminist contributions in ity is based on the assumption that the glory of God is lacking in each that, rather than concentrating on the link between the embodiment of and every one of us, and thus "all distinctions between men are seen to creatures and the immanence of God, it emphasizes the inextricability of be trivial." 9 We may sympathize with Barth's critiques of hierarchies of God's transcendence and the transcendence of the human Other. his times, but the dissolution of distinction has revealed itself to be a fraught strategy that confuses homogeneity with solidarity. This work THE WHOLLY OTHER argues that divine transcendence does not need to dissolve or even sub­ ordinate created differences. Indeed a relational transcendence touches In contemporary Christian theology, the idea of transcendence is associ­ creatures, embracing their irreducible differences.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Original Monotheism: a Signal of Transcendence Challenging
    Liberty University Original Monotheism: A Signal of Transcendence Challenging Naturalism and New Ageism A Thesis Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Divinity in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Ministry Department of Christian Leadership and Church Ministries by Daniel R. Cote Lynchburg, Virginia April 5, 2020 Copyright © 2020 by Daniel R. Cote All Rights Reserved ii Liberty University School of Divinity Thesis Project Approval Sheet Dr. T. Michael Christ Adjunct Faculty School of Divinity Dr. Phil Gifford Adjunct Faculty School of Divinity iii THE DOCTOR OF MINISTRY THESIS PROJECT ABSTRACT Daniel R. Cote Liberty University School of Divinity, 2020 Mentor: Dr. T. Michael Christ Where once in America, belief in Christian theism was shared by a large majority of the population, over the last 70 years belief in Christian theism has significantly eroded. From 1948 to 2018, the percent of Americans identifying as Catholic or Christians dropped from 91 percent to 67 percent, with virtually all the drop coming from protestant denominations.1 Naturalism and new ageism increasingly provide alternative means for understanding existential reality without the moral imperatives and the belief in the divine associated with Christian theism. The ironic aspect of the shifting of worldviews underway in western culture is that it continues with little regard for strong evidence for the truth of Christian theism emerging from historical, cultural, and scientific research. One reality long overlooked in this regard is the research of Wilhelm Schmidt and others, which indicates that the earliest religion of humanity is monotheism. Original monotheism is a strong indicator of the existence of a transcendent God who revealed Himself as portrayed in Genesis 1-11, thus affirming the truth of essential elements of Christian theism and the falsity of naturalism and new ageism.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical and Horizontal Transcendence Ursula Goodenough Washington University in St Louis, [email protected]
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations Biology 3-2001 Vertical and Horizontal Transcendence Ursula Goodenough Washington University in St Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/bio_facpubs Part of the Biology Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Goodenough, Ursula, "Vertical and Horizontal Transcendence" (2001). Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations. 93. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/bio_facpubs/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL TRANSCENDENCE Ursula Goodenough Draft of article published in Zygon 36: 21-31 (2001) ABSTRACT Transcendence is explored from two perspectives: the traditional concept wherein the origination of the sacred is “out there,” and the alternate concept wherein the sacred originates “here.” Each is evaluated from the perspectives of aesthetics and hierarchy. Both forms of transcendence are viewed as essential to the full religious life. KEY WORDS: transcendence, green spirituality, sacredness, aesthetics, hierarchy VERTICAL TRANSCENDENCE One of the core themes of the monotheistic traditions, and many Asian traditions as well, is the concept of transcendence. A description of this orientation from comparative religionist Michael Kalton (2000) can serve to anchor our discussion. "Transcendence" both describes a metaphysical structure grounding the contingent in the Absolute, and a practical spiritual quest of rising above changing worldly affairs to ultimate union with the Eternal.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Immanent Possibilities & Beyond: Transcendence in Kierkegaard's
    Immanent Possibilities & Beyond: 7 Transcendence in Kierkegaard’s Philosophy of Existence and in T. Rentsch’s Phenomenological Hermeneutics Sebastian Hüsch | Aix-Marseille University 01 See Max Horkheimer (1947), One of the fundamental phenomena of Modernity is the erosion 22: “Meaning is supplanted by of meaning1. In recent years, the discussion around the “come function or effect in the world of 2 3 things and events.” See also the back of religion” and the “post-secular society” seems to interview Horkheimer gave the affirm the problem of a deficit of meaning in (post-)modern SPIEGEL in 1973 which is even more pessimistic (or fatalistic?) on this society and to invalidate the conviction — firmly held by many — behalf than Eclipse of Reason. that secularization is inevitable and irreversible 4 and that it is 02 See the volume edited by accompanied by an increase in possibilities the individual can Norbert Bolz & Esther Gisberger freely choose from to construct an existence that is experienced (2008) on this issue. as meaningful and fulfilled5. If it would probably be an over- 03 See on this topic Peter Nynas et al. (2013); Péter Losonczi/Aakash interpretation of the extent of the phenomenon if one was to Singh (2010); Ziebertz/Riegel (2008). talk unambiguously about a change of paradigm with regards to 04 See Peter L. Berger (2013), secularization, it seems at least possible, at present, to revisit the who first represented the theory role transcendence can play for human beings as a constituens of secularization and who has recently edited a volume with the of meaning at the beginning of the 21th century and to argue in eloquent title Nach dem Niedergang favor of approaches that allow for perspectives that go beyond der Säkularisierungstheorie (“After the decline of the theory mere immanence but without falling short of the state of the art ofsecularization”).
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Six M O D E L S O F G O D Key Concepts and Considerations
    LESSON SIX M O D E L S O F G O D If there is a God, HOW does this God exist? KEY CONCEPTS AND CONSIDERATIONS 2 * Key Terms Transcendence; Immanence; Creation ex deus; Creation ex nihilo * Models of God Pantheism Panentheism Theism Deism OVERVIEW 3 This lesson is best understood as an extension of the previous lesson. In this lesson the attention shifts from debates about the fact of God's existence to debates regarding the manner of God's existence. The question pursued here initially is: How does God exist? The focus is upon the possible relationships that God may have in relationship to creation, both at its point of origin, and with regard to its continuance. Four precise models are presented. These are: Pantheism; Panentheism ; Theism; and Deism. These models will be treated in a systematic fashion. Our discussion will focus upon: (1) an explanation of the name for the model; (2) an identification of key thinkers associated with the model; (3) a listing of some of the tenets of the model; and (4) an assessment of the model which will identify both strengths and weaknesses. Before beginning our systematic survey of each model it will be necessary to define and discuss four key terms. These terms are: Transcendence; Immanence ; Creation ex deus; and Creation ex nihilo. DEFINITION & DISCUSSION OF KEY TERMS The four terms needing definition and discussion may be grouped into two pairs. Transcendence and immanence belong together, as do creation ex deus and creation ex nihilo. The first term in need of definition is transcendence.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric and Resistance: the New School and Gnosticism
    235 Rhetoric and Resistance: The New School and Gnosticism David J. Hawkin 1. The New School The term ‘New School’ was coined by Darrell Bock in his book The Missing Gospels .1 Bock intended the term to apply to those scholars who are interested in what Bart Ehrman has termed ‘lost Christianities’, 2 that is, expressions of Christianity which have disappeared from history. Scholars of the New School are interested in recovering these lost Christianities. In one of his more eloquent passages Ehrman argues that such a recovery is not merely of antiquarian interest. Rather, says Ehrman, there is a ‘a sense that alternative understandings of Christianity from the past can be cherished yet again today, that they can provide insights even now for those of us who are concerned about the world and our place in it’. 3 Ehrman clearly implies that we need to become aware of these alternatives as they will help us become more tolerant and broad minded. The godfather for the scholars of the New School is Walter Bauer. In his most famous book, Rechtglaeubigkeit und Ketzerei im aeltesten Christentum (1934), 4 Bauer attempted to debunk the notion that the terms orthodoxy and heresy could be applied in any meaningful way to earliest Christianity. He claimed that if we allowed the ‘other side’ to be heard, the side which had been silenced and eclipsed by what later became orthodox Christianity, we would see earliest Christianity very differently. We would see that the orthodox had ruthlessly suppressed genuine and authentic alternative forms of Christianity which had, in fact, been there at its very beginnings.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Divine Transcendence: a Religio-Historical Portrayal
    CHAPTER 3 DIVINE TRANSCENDENCE: A RELIGIO-HISTORICAL PORTRAYAL 3.1 INTRODUCTION One expression of the relationship between God and the world is his transcendence. Transcendence in Christianity means that, “God is separate from and independent of nature and humanity. God is not simply attached to, or involved in, his creation. He is also superior to it in several significant ways” (Erickson 1985:312). However, Isaiah 57:15 indicates the paradox of transcendence, “For thus says the high and lofty one who inhabits eternity, whose name is Holy: I dwell in the high and holy place, and also with those who are contrite and humble in spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite.” Jeremiah 23:23 reads, “Am I only a God nearby, declares the LORD, and not a God far away?” These verses couple a statement of the transcendence of God with another expression of the relationship of God with his creation, namely his immanence. In contrast with transcendence, God’s immanence indicates, “God condescends to enter into personal fellowship and live with those who have repented of their sins and trusted His son for their salvation” (Enns 1989:637). Within this transcendent-immanent nature of God, the people of the Old Testament entered into a covenantal relationship with God (Ex 6:4; 24:7; 34:27). The term “transcendence” in Arabic is tanzih. It is defined as the elimination of blemishes or of anthropomorphic traits, which is the assertion of God’s incomparability with the creation 59 (Glasse 2001:450).
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRANSCENDENCE of GOD and the VALUE of HUMAN LIFE Throughout This Paper I Shall Keep in View Two General Areas of Reference, Two Sources of Understanding
    THE TRANSCENDENCE OF GOD AND THE VALUE OF HUMAN LIFE Throughout this paper I shall keep in view two general areas of reference, two sources of understanding. One his human experience: of the values of human life, and of valuing. The other is Christian theology, or at least certain affirmations made in the intellectual life of faith which pertain to the valuing of human life. Any discourse which attempts to move between theology and ethics by necessity must keep these two areas and sources in view. If theological principles and affirmations pertain to human moral values, they do so in two ways. Either they are principles and affirmations which include within the divine purposes those purposes which are moral, that is, which stipulate human moral values, ends, rules, etc., or the religious com- munity infers certain moral values, ends, rules, etc., to be consistent, coherent, harmonious, consonant with affirmations about God. If claims are made for transformation, emandation, penetration, alter- ation, re-orientation of human experience through religious faith, those claims are in principle subject to virtually empirical investigation. There are two pitfalls in the efforts to relate theology and ethics in general which I wish to avoid. On the one hand are the temptations to deduce too much from theological principles for ethics, a pitfall more characteristic of the religious rhetoric of some continental Protestants more than of either Roman Catholic or American Protestant theologians, e.g., the claim that what is morally right is determined by the command of God in the moment. On the other hand are the temptations to separate the ethical discourse from the theological, confining the significance of the theological to soteriology, and finding the resources for the ethical only in what (hopefully) all men can accept in common as the human and the moral.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Atheism and Atheology: the Divine Humanism of Emmanuel Levinas
    religions Article Beyond Atheism and Atheology: The Divine Humanism of Emmanuel Levinas Manuel A. Cruz College of Theology & Christian Ministry, Belmont University, 1900 Belmont Blvd., Nashville, TN 37212, USA; [email protected] Received: 2 January 2019; Accepted: 15 February 2019; Published: 23 February 2019 Abstract: Is the divine a meaningful and indispensable element of moral responsibility? Emmanuel Levinas’ ethics have brought new expression to the question of God and the Good. Contemporary engagements with Levinas’ provocation, however, have generated a morass of contrary judgments and enigmatic explications, including praise and criticism for its atheology, secular transcendence, and crypto-religious conceit. The essay takes issue with secular and atheistic interpretations of Levinas, arguing that his mature ethics offer a philosophical species of divine humanism, one that justifies the indispensable significance of the divine for moral responsibility. It examines the philosophical problems that lead to the creation of new phenomenological descriptions for divine transcendence, and it sheds light on the seemingly erratic scattering of divine names—infinite, third person, trace, immemorial past, absence, beyond being, illeity—as improvisational orchestrations for God at the margins of moral responsibility. Keywords: humanism; ethics; God; being; Heidegger; Levinas; absence; phenomenology; atheism; transcendence 1. Beyond Atheism and Atheology The ethics of Emmanuel Levinas contains some of the most innovative and perplexing
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism As a “Faith”
    Atheism as a “faith” An address concerning one aspect of atheism in relation to secularism in the United States Very Rev. Dr. Thomas A. Baima Faith, Reason and Atheism Conference Saint Joseph Pontifical Seminary Carmelgiri, Aluva, Kerala, India November 14, 2020 Let me begin by thanking the Reverend Dr. Clement Valluvassery for the kind invitation to participate in this webinar marking the quasquicentennial celebration of the publication The Living Word, a Journal of Philosophy and Theology. I am pleased to learn of the work of St Joseph Pontifical Seminary, Carmelgiri, Alwaye, Kerala, India. As a seminary professor and contributing editor of the journal Chicago Studies, I am glad to see that the dimension of intellectual formation both in and beyond Saint Joseph Pontifical Seminary is treated with such seriousness. Pastoral ministry today requires that priests be up to the task intellectually. In many places, and this is certainly true in the United States of America, the majority of the population has a good secular education, often to the tertiary level. A good number of people have significant education in their profession. But sadly, our religious education tends to stop after age 14 for most people. As a result, through no fault of their own, when faced with issues such as are being considered at this conference: our people face them with a religious formation that does not measure up to the secular education they have received. 1 The first thing I want to suggest in my remarks today is that we have to prepare ourselves, as theologians, priests, and ministers, to accompany our people as they journey through lives which will confront them with challenges we ourselves did not have to face.
    [Show full text]
  • God's Immanence: Liturgical Implications? Thomas Hughson Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Theology Faculty Research and Publications Theology, Department of 1-1-2016 God's Immanence: Liturgical Implications? Thomas Hughson Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. God's Immanence: Liturgical Implications? College Theology Society Annual Convention 2016. © 2016 published by Thomas Hughson. Used with permission. 1 God’s Immanence: Liturgical Implications? A Question The 2016 Call for Papers in Systematic Theology asked, "In what way does the efficacy of the sacraments promote belief in the doctrine of God?" Inquiring in the reverse direction, "how does belief in the doctrine of God promote the efficacy of the sacraments?" will be the aim here. Belief is the act, doctrine on God the content; sacraments and liturgy will be interchangeable. Is the latter question methodologically legitimate? There is, after all, “the ancient saying: lex orandi, lex credendi …The law of prayer is the law of faith: the Church believes as she prays.”1 Should not the priority of liturgy to doctrine organize reflection? And yet the Church not only believes as she prays but also prays as she believes. So “When the Church celebrates the sacraments, she confesses the faith received from the apostles.”2 Sacraments confess and so contain “the faith received from the apostles.” Does not a mutual rather than unilateral dynamic underlie the ancient saying?3 The priority of Christ, Scripture, and apostolic tradition made beliefs normative in the origin, however inchoate, of exterior, effective, sacramental signs and meanings through which Christ and the Spirit acted within people. Seven ecumenical councils from 325 C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Mysticism As Accommodation of Transcendence
    Mysticism as accommodation of transcendence Jeremy Jacobs1 St George’s Anglican Church, Johannesburg, South Africa Introduction Mysticism, in its broadest sense, is best understood as a generic term that variously describes experiences which are felt to be extraordinary and profound to the extent that they cannot be intellectually defined nor rendered in language. At this early stage, the problem is evident: Transrational and ineffable qualities are normative in experiences of mystical transcendence; yet it is precisely these obfuscations that contravene linguistic and metho- dological protocols in academia. This problem can be wittily illustrated for the purpose of this debate from a linguistic vantage point: The mystical experience can only be said to exist when it can be said to exist, but since transcendence is ineffable, it cannot be said to exist and therefore cannot exist. How, in view of such paradoxical absurdities, can mysticism qualify as a field of analytical or critical research in academic discourse? What questions can reasonably be posed in a debate where the languages of reason and science are fundamental? Clearly, some foundations have to be set to provide contexts wherein such an examination can take place. In an attempt to establish a degree of scholarly coherence, given the equivocation around meanings that are ascribed to mysticism and trans- cendence, this paper will firstly give some general definitions of mysticism to facilitate an understanding of its phenomenology and ontology.2 Secondly, in a forum where the dialects of science and religion are afforded equal hearings, distinctions have to be drawn between the linguistic and episte- mological peculiarities of these dialects.
    [Show full text]
  • How Relationship-Enhancing Transcendent Religious Experiences During Adversity Can Encourage Relational Meaning, Depth, Healing, and Action
    religions Article How Relationship-Enhancing Transcendent Religious Experiences during Adversity Can Encourage Relational Meaning, Depth, Healing, and Action David C. Dollahite 1,* , Loren D. Marks 1 , Alyssa Banford Witting 1, Ashley B. LeBaron 2, Kaity Pearl Young 3 and Joe M. Chelladurai 1 1 School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] (L.D.M.); [email protected] (A.B.W.); [email protected] (J.M.C.) 2 Family Studies and Human Development, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; [email protected] 3 Marriage and Family Therapy Graduate Program, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 August 2020; Accepted: 30 September 2020; Published: 10 October 2020 Abstract: Research on the relationship between religion, spirituality, and health suggests that religious involvement can help people deal with various kinds of adversity. Although there has been a great deal of work on the influence of religious involvement and religious and spiritual practices on physical, mental, and relational health, there exists a gap in the theoretical and empirical literature about the potential benefits of transcendent religious experiences on marriage and family relationships. We report some findings from a study of in-depth interviews with 198 religious American exemplar families from diverse religious, ethnic, and geographic backgrounds. The religious-ethnic make-up of the sample included: African American Christian (13%), Asian Christian (12%), Catholic and Orthodox Christian (11%), White Evangelical Christian (12%), White Mainline Christian (10%), Latter-day Saint (LDS, Mormon), (14%), Jewish (16%), and Muslim (12%).
    [Show full text]