DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Newark and Sherwood District Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Newark and Sherwood District Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Newark and Sherwood District Council electoral review This PDF document contains 43 submissions. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Ward, Lucy Subject: FW: Boundary changes Blidworth & Rainworth From: John A [ Sent: 21 December 2013 19:33 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary changes Blidworth & Rainworth I do not agree with your proposals? The siting of present boundaries differentiating Rainworth from Blidworth are historical, geographical and demographically relevant. Your proposals lump part of Rainworth with Blidworth, not a move that will be popular with both groups. That is why I am considering both wards, as changes in one would affect the other. You might consider putting together the Mansfield part of Rainworth with the NSDC part. But I am not desperate for this to happen, I am happy with things as they are Proposed housing changes will boost population in both areas. So change would have to be undone in the future. Having attended both Parish Council meetings I am convinced the Parish Councillors have local expertise and that the issues associated with each rely on this local knowledge so as to determine parish council positions on specific and very local issues. Your proposals do not reflect the interests and identities of our local communities. These are best served by leaving things as they are. I have no suggestions for new ward/division names; these are not merited. My proposals possibly does not mean each councillor represents roughly the same number of voters but I do not think this is an issue. John Allen 1 Ward, Lucy From: Sent: 30 December 2013 20:34 To: Ward, Lucy Subject: Re Rainworth Boundaries Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Why can't people leave our village alone??? I moved to Rainworth 11 years ago. If I had wanted to live in Blidworth or Bilsthorpe I would have bought a house there. These changes are ludicrous. We want our whole village to have a community, not to be divided up just to suite someone else's agenda!!! I knew nothing of this until just before Christmas, so well publicized to RESIDENTS of OUR VILLAGE it has not been. Leave us a lone to live in our village. These changes are insane!!!!! Mrs Alison Bailey Sent from Samsung tablet 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Newark and Sherwood District Personal Details: Name: Barbara Barratt E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: As a res dent of Wellow for the past 59 years, I have seen what the effect of putting small villages in the same ward as large urban areas has had on the smaller communities. Ollerton has grown to such an extent that t is now classed as a town, so my fear is that the problems we encountered in the past can only be exaggerated. At present we have a District Councillor who was born and brought up in a rural community and who understands the needs of the small villages and supports them accordingly. I fully support the views of Wellow Parish Council in this matter and hope that you will take both their and our views into account when making your final decisions on what is a very important matter for our village. https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2746 30/12/2013 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2746 30/12/2013 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Newark and Sherwood District Personal Details: Name: keith bradley E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: The village of Wellow Should be in Sutton on Trent ward in order to preserve ts rural dentity https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2778 06/01/2014 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2778 06/01/2014 Ward, Lucy From: nicholas brownley Sent: 06 January 2014 16:00 To: Ward, Lucy Subject: Comments regarding Boundary proposals in Rainworth Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged In reference to the proposals for Rainworth. I strongly oppose the proposals. I am writing as a resident of Rainworth Village living on one of the streets to be lost to Blidworth. Our village is already divided by having a sizeable area under Mansfield District Council. I feel by further dividing Rainworth we would lose our sense of community and an ability to stand strong together on local issues. We want to retain an identifiable village, as Edwinstowe and Southwell have. We have good electorate numbers to be a 2 member ward, so where is the necessity to split the village further. We have Schools, Doctors, Dentist, shops and three District Councillors. Fortunately a small number of residents stumbled across the information concerning the boundary proposals and have endeavoured to pass the information on to other residents. This was in December 2013 with the deadline for comments to be in by 6th January 2014. Taking out the busy festive period, this did not leave much time Residents that became aware of the proposals were not in favour of them, and signed a petition to show there feelings. I feel it was also unfair that as a village we did not receive any information regarding these proposals through our doors. I read a small piece in our local newspaper, but even this did not outline what is proposed. We do not have community links to the other villages mentioned . I do not feel we would benefit at all from this. Rainworth would certainly not have clear identifiable boundaries. None of the proposals would make it any easier for Councils to deliver an effective and convenient local Government as our representatives will more than likely be residents of other villages with no community links to ours. We need representatives with passion and understanding of our community, not one 20 something miles away. It is my proposal that Rainworth be a 2 member ward. Kind regards, Samantha Brownley. 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Newark and Sherwood District Personal Details: Name: Helen Cattle E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: As a small rural village (populat on a l ttle over 400 people), Wellow shares many common characteristics and issues with other similar settlements to the east that are very much Newark focussed and collectively form a distinct band of the District that has a very strong agricultural emphasis and a dispersed, low dens ty population. At the same time, like many of these other villages to the east, Wellow has a well preserved individual identity, with substantial Conservat on Area coverage reflecting its unique settlement form and open spaces, a small commun ty w th limited local serv ces and a clear and up to date local planning framework that post dates the National Planning Policy Framework and dentifies no specif c growth objectives. In reviewing the boundaries, t is imperative that the interests and indiv dual ident ty of Wellow are appropriately reflected and that the arrangements ensure that Wellow is represented by a councillor that understands these interests and characteristics, and the issues faced by Wellow as a small rural commun ty. Inclusion within Ollerton Ward would not achieve this due to the very different urban attributes of Ollerton, that has a substantial, high density population which is set to increase further through several large scale residential development s tes allocated in the July 2013 Newark and Sherwood Site Allocations and Development Management DPD (Local Plan). W thin the proposed Ollerton and Boughton wards, allocated sites amount to 537 new dwellings. This would represent a significantly greater population than that of Wellow, whereas in comparison, there is only one allocated s te for just 37 dwellings in the proposed Sutton on Trent ward to the east. Ollerton has a strong and well established Town Council with clear pr or ties focussed on physical, social and economic regeneration to help overcome the legacy of the former mining industry within a high density settlement. Ollerton marks the eastern edge of the Nottinghamshire Coalfield whilst both in physical landscape and socio-economic terms, the village of Wellow marks very much the beginning of the rural/agricultural band of the Distr ct that stretches eastwards to the market town of Newark. Because of the significant imbalance in the scale of communities involved, electoral representat on within ‘Ollerton Ward’ would understandably be dominated by the needs and priorities of the substantial former mining community, and there is an extremely strong likelihood that the distinctly different issues facing Wellow would not be recognised and understood, and that they would become marginalised and attributed insufficient weight. There is also the added risk that, when combined w th the significant growth plans for Ollerton, this lack of recognit on for the distinct interests of Wellow would, over time, result in ts indiv dual identity being eroded and potentially lost to the excessive domination of the much larger settlement to the west. There is only one main bus route serving Wellow, the ‘No: 32 to Newark’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cree Families of Newark on Trent
    The Cree Families of Newark on Trent by Mike Spathaky Cree Surname Research The Cree Families of Newark on Trent by Mike Spathaky Cree Booklets The Cree Family History Society (now Cree Surname Research) was founded in 1991 to encourage research into the history and world-wide distribution of the surname CREE and of families of that name, and to collect, conserve and make available the results of that research. The series Cree Booklets is intended to further those aims by providing a channel through which family histories and related material may be published which might otherwise not see the light of day. Cree Surname Research 36 Brocks Hill Drive Oadby, Leicester LE2 5RD England. Cree Surname Research CONTENTS Chart of the descendants of Joshua Cree and Sarah Hand Joshua Cree and Sarah Hand Crees at the Muskhams - Isaac Cree and Maria Sanders The plight of single parents - the families of Joseph and Sarah Cree The open fields First published in 1994-97 as a series of articles in Cree News by the Cree Family History Society. William Cree and Mary Scott This electronic edition revised and published in 2005 by More accidents - John Cree, Ellen and Thirza Maltsters and iron founders - Francis Cree and Mary King Cree Surname Research 36 Brocks Hill Drive Fanny Cree and the boatmen of Newark Oadby Leicester LE2 5RD England © Copyright Mike Spathaky 1994-97, 2005 All Rights Reserved Elizabeth CREE b Collingham, Notts Descendants of Joshua Cree and Sarah Hand bap 10 Mar 1850 S Muskham, Notts (three generations) = 1871 Southwell+, Notts Robert
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire
    TIADBS DIRBOTO:R.Y.] NOTTINGHAMSHIRE. Ft18 1493 :Bumell Arms, John Rickett, Winkburn, Southwell Cross Keys, Robert Willillm Ford, Beanmond street, Newark- .Hutchers' Arms, Robert Brookes, Arnold, Nottingham upon.Trent :Butchers' Arms, Thos. Calvert, 46 Newcastle st. Nottinghm Cross Keys, William Foster, Epperstone, Nottingham Butchers' Arms, Jn. Diggle,45 Lincoln st.Basford,Nottinghm Cross Keys, Charles Godber, West gate, Mansfield Butchers' Arm~, William Gray, Laneham, Lincoln Cross Keys, John Hickling, West gatt>, Mansfield Butchers' Arms, John Littlewood, Carol gate, Retford C..'ross Keys, Frederick Hogl!", Burton Joyce, Nottingham :Byron's Rest, Thomas Blatberwick, High street, Hucknall Cross Keys, Isaac .Roland, Potter street, Worksop Torkard, Nottingham CrQSS Keys, Wiiliam Silliman, Uptoli, Southwell Cadland inn, George Bretnall, Chilwell, Nottingham Crown inn, John Truman Barker, Awswortb, Nottingham Carlton hotel, J n. A lien, Noel st.nth. Hyson green,Nottnghm Crown inn, Jn. Blatherwick, Church st. Beeston,Nottingham Carnarvon Arms, Cleophas Roper, Fackley, Teversal, Manstld Crown, John Cocking, Beckingham, Gainsborougb Carpenters' Arms, Albert Urban Boddy, Boughton, Newark Crown, William Goodwin, Bingham, Nottingham Carpenters' Arms, Henry Frost, Newgate lane, Mansfield - Crown inn, Eli HaLl, Radford marsh, Radfot'd, Nottingham Carpenters' Arms, John "'Thomas Lane, Walesby, Newark Crown, George Hempsall, East Markham, Newark • Carringtou Arms, Mrs. Jane 'l'aylor, Carrington street & 2 Crown, John Herrod, Bathley, Newark Broad marsh, Nottingham Crown inn, Edward Holbeary, Crown street, Worksop Cart & Horse, Samuel Taylor, Forest street, Sntton-in- Crown inn, Edwin Pare, Rolleston, Newark Ashfield, Nottingham Crown inn, Thomas Richards, Stockwell gate, Mansfield Castle inn, John Vickers, 2 Waterway street, Nottingham Crown, Mrs. &lrah A. Sharp, Market place, ~outhwell Castle &.Falcon, Jn.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire Further electoral review December 2005 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 15 2 Current electoral arrangements 19 3 Submissions received 23 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 25 Electorate figures 26 Council size 26 Electoral equality 27 General analysis 28 Warding arrangements 28 a Clipstone, Edwinstowe and Ollerton wards 29 b Bilsthorpe, Blidworth, Farnsfield and Rainworth wards 30 c Boughton, Caunton and Sutton-on-Trent wards 32 d Collingham & Meering, Muskham and Winthorpe wards 32 e Newark-on-Trent (five wards) 33 f Southwell town (three wards) 35 g Balderton North, Balderton West and Farndon wards 36 h Lowdham and Trent wards 38 Conclusions 39 Parish electoral arrangements 39 5 What happens next? 43 6 Mapping 45 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 47 B Code of practice on written consultation 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the North Muskham Parish Council Meeting Held On
    SUBJECT TO RATIFICATION AT THE 16th SEPTEMBER 2019 PARISH COUNCIL MEETING Minutes of the North Muskham Parish Council held on Monday, 29th July 2019 at the Muskham Rural Community Centre following the Annual Parish Meeting Present: Councillor I Harrison, in the Chair Councillor S Dolby Councillor N Hutchings Councillor D Jones Councillor P Morris Councillor D Saxton Also in attendance: County Cllr B Laughton, Dr Readman and 4 members of the public NM031-20 Apologies for absence Apologies for absence were received and accepted from Cllrs Beddoe and District Cllr Mrs Saddington. NM32-20 Declarations of interest Cllr Hutchings declared a personal and pecuniary interest in agenda item 8(a) 24 The Grange, North Muskham. It was AGREED that any other declarations of interest would be stated by Members as required during the meeting. NM33-20 Minutes The minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on Wednesday, 26th June 2019 were accepted as a true and correct record and signed by the Chairman. NM34-20 Update on Issues Members received and noted the updated issues document, attached to the minutes as Appendix 1. NM35-20 Public 10 Minute Session The Chair suspended the meeting at 7.03pm to allow questions from members of the public. No questions were raised and the meeting was reconvened at 7.04pm. NM36-20 District Councillor Session No report was presented as Cllr Mrs Saddington had given her apologies. NM37-20 County Councillor Session The Chair suspended the meeting at 7.04pm for Cllr Laughton to present his report. Cllr Laughton confirmed that the lorry recently reported as parking overnight on Main Street had been escalated, and the District Council had spoken to GEDA.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING SUPPORTING STATEMENT NCC Received 05/06/2017
    TOWN-PLANNING.CO.UK Use of Land for the importation, storage and processing of construction and infrastructure inert waste Land Adjacent to Railway Line (Former Highways Depot), Off Great North Road, North Muskham, Newark, NG23 6HN Applicant: Laffey's Ltd PLANNING SUPPORTING STATEMENT NCC Received 05/06/2017 June 2017 South View, 16 Hounsfield Way, Sutton on Trent, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG23 6PX Tel: 01636 822528; Mobile 07521 731789; Email: [email protected] Managing Director – Anthony Northcote, HNCert LA(P), Dip TP, PgDip URP, MA, FGS, ICIOB, MInstLM, MCMI, MRTPI TOWN-PLANNING.CO.UK is a trading name of Anthony Northcote Planning Ltd, Company Registered in England & Wales (6979909) Website: www.town-planning.co.uk TOWN-PLANNING.CO.UK Great North Road, North Muskham This planning statement has been produced by TOWN-PLANNING.CO.UK to support this individual planning proposal and the conclusions it reaches are based only upon the planning application information the LPA has made available on its website, other published information and information provided to the company by the client and/or their representatives. The author of this report is: Anthony Bryan Northcote, Managing Director of TOWN-PLANNING.CO.UK. He holds a Higher National Certificate in Land Administration (Planning) with Distinction; Diploma with Distinction in Town Planning; Post-Graduate Diploma with Distinction in Urban and Regional Planning together with a Master of Arts Degree in Urban and Regional Planning. He was elected to the Royal Town Planning Institute in 1996 and now has over 26 years planning experience within the public and private sectors involving a full range of planning issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4: Spring Walks
    1 Introduction Welcome to our fourth volume of ‘100 Walks from the Poppy and Pint’. This volume contains Spring Walks for you to enjoy now that the lockdown has eased. I hope that you find it useful. You will find 49 walks in this volume bringing the total number of walks in the series to 150! This volume is quite different to the other volumes. These walks have been specially selected from a wider radius of Lady Bay. This gives us more choice, more variety, and the chance to showcase different areas. Most of the walks start within 30 minutes’ drive from the Poppy and Pint and most are relatively short walks of around two to three hours. All have been chosen because they hold one or more points of interest. Moreover, the paths are quiet, they are varied, and all are on good, waymarked paths. This makes them ideal spring walks just after the lockdown. Being out on the trail in the open air anywhere lifts the spirits, is good for the soul, and gives our lives a different perspective. I think we always feel better when we come back from a walk! Do try it and see! This is the fourth volume of walks to complement Volumes One, Two and Three. Unfortunately, it is not possible to put these four volumes into one tome as the subsequent size of the file would be too big to e mail! When I set myself the challenge of researching and creating 100 local walks, I never actually thought it was possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 2 Local Bus Travel Guide for Bingham, Radcliffe, East Bridgford and West Bridgford Areas
    Area 2 local bus travel guide for Bingham, Radcliffe, East Bridgford and West Bridgford areas August 2014 This leaflet provides a travel map and destination and frequency guide for all local bus services in the Eastwood, Jacksdale and Selston area. Full timetables for these services can be obtained from the relevant operators, contact details are shown below. Service Route Days of Early morning Daytime Evening Sundays operation Every Every Every Every 1 Nottingham - East Leake - Loughborough (* Limited service to Loughborough) Daily 15-30 mins 15-30 mins 30-60 mins* 60 mins* 2 Nottingham - Trent Bridge - Clifton Daily 15-30 mins 15-30 mins 60 mins 60 mins 3 Nottingham - Trent Bridge - Clifton, Hartness Road Mon - Sat ---- 30 mins ---- ---- 4 Nottingham - Clifton - NTU Campus (operates NTU term days only) Mon - Fri 15-30mins 7-10 mins 15-30 mins ---- N4 Nottingham - Clifton NTU Campus Mon - Sat nightbus ---- ---- ---- 60 mins 5 Nottingham - West Bridgford - Gamston Daily 30-60 mins 30 mins ---- 60 mins 6 Nottingham - Trent Bridge - Central Avenue - Edwalton Daily 15 mins 15 mins 30 mins 30 mins N6 Nottingham - Trent Bridge - Central Avenue - Edwalton - Gamston Fri, Sat night bus 60 mins ---- ---- ---- 6 Bingham/Radcliffe - Grantham Mon - Fri School days 2 journeys 2 journeys ---- ---- 7 Nottingham - Trent Bridge - West Bridgford - Gamston Daily 30 mins 30 mins 30-60 mins 60 mins 8 Nottingham - Trent Bridge - West Bridgford - Rushcliffe Leisure Centre - Compton Acres Daily 15-30 mins 30 mins 60 mins 60 mins 9 Nottingham - Trent Bridge -
    [Show full text]
  • 10/02/2021 MEMBERS INTERESTS Page 1
    MEMBERS INTERESTS 11/09/2021 ID SURNAME CODE PLACE NAME DATES 0014 Archbold NBL Embleton 1840 0014 Bingham NTT North Wheatley 1700 0014 Fletcher / Fruchard LND London 1700 0014 Goodenough SOM Norton St Phillip 1800 0014 Hardy NTT South Wheatley 1700 0014 Holdstock KEN Canterbury 1700 0014 Holdstock LND London 1800 0014 Lines BKM Marsworth 1800 0014 Neale HRT Barley 1700 0014 Robertson AYR Ayrshire 1800 0014 Steedman NTT North Leverton 1700 0014 Whitby CAM Arrington 1800 0014 Windmill SOM Prudsford 1800 0033 Bettney DBY Derbyshire Any 0033 Bettney NTT Nottinghamshire Any 0033 Storey GBR United Kingdom Any 0033 Twells GBR United Kingdom Any 0034 Baggaley NTT Mansfield pre 1800 0034 Quibell NTT Ragnall pre 1800 0034 Quibell NTT Darlton pre 1800 0034 Quibell NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1800 0109 Askey NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1850 0109 Askey STS Staffordshire pre 1850 0109 Beardall NTT Bestwood 1688+ 0109 Beardall NTT Hucknall 1688+ 0109 Beardall NTT Linby 1688+ 0109 Bird LEI Worthington 1857+ 0109 Butler NTT Hucknall Any 0109 Cadwallender GLS Gloucestershire pre 1850 0109 Cadwallender NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1850 0109 Camm NTT Widmerpool 1800+ 0109 Clarke NTT Linby 1750+ 0109 Fox LEI Wymeswold Any 0109 Fox NTT East Leake Any 0109 Harby NTT Nottinghamshire Any 0109 Haskey NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1850 0109 Haskey STS Staffordshire pre 1850 0109 Hayes NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1700 0109 Kem LEI Grimston pre 1800 0109 Kem NTT Widmerpool pre 1800 0109 Kirkland NTT Linby 1700+ 0109 Parnham NTT Bingham 1700+ 0109 Potter NTT Linby 1700+ 0109 Rose NTT Bulwell
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Information Request 031861.Pdf
    List of Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Consultants and Suppliers currently used by Via East Midlands Limited 1. MHA MSF2 Contractor Balfour Beatty Limited 1 Trinity Park, Bickenhill Lane, Solihull B37 7ES 2. Via Term Sub-Contract Partner Tarmac Ltd Granite House, Granite Way, Syston, LE7 1PL 3. Via Framework Sub-Contractors ACL Highway Services Ireland Close, Staveley, Derbyshire, S43 3PE Acorn Environmental Management Group 2a Eagle Road, North Moons Moat, Redditch, Worcestershire, B98 9HF Alliance Contracting Solutions Ltd Sidings Road, Lowmoor Business Park, Kirkby in Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 7JZ Atlas Traffic Management Ltd Unit B3 Fallons Road, Wardley Industrial Estate, M28 2NY Blagg Plant Hire Ltd Hatfield Farm, Thorpe Lane, Shireoaks, Worksop, S81 8LS Britnell Tree Services Ltd Wedgewood Hopyard Lane, Bathley, Newark, Nottingham, NG23 6DQ CB Services 74 Columbia Avenue, Sutton in Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 2HA CEMEX Pavin Solutions Ltd Coldharbour Lane, Thorpe, Egham, Surrey, TW20 8TD CF Construction (Collingham) Ltd Moor Farm, Coddington Lane, Stapleford, Lincolnshire, LN6 9LE Chris Wheeler Construction Ltd Church Lane, Burbage, Wiltshire, SN8 3AT Commercial Surfacing Solutions Ltd 38 Goodwood Avenue, Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 7BB CP Berry Groundworks Ltd Unit D Mercury Court, Daniels Way, Hucknall, Nottingham, NG15 7LL CR Civil Engineering Ltd Quorn House, Charnwood Business Park, North Road, Loughborough, LE11 1LE Danaher & Walsh (Civil Engineering) Ltd 20 Granite Way, Mountsorrel, Leicestershire, LE12 7TZ DeAngelo
    [Show full text]
  • North Muskham, Bathley Lane and Church Lane; and • Whitehouses, Barnby and Bullpit Lane
    What happens next? Timeline of activity East Coast Main Line (ECML) Summer 2014 Stage 1 - first round of public consultation [COMPLETE] Autumn/Winter 2014 Stage 2 - second round of public consultation ` Summer/Autumn 2015 Stage 3 – develop options and submit Transport and Works Act Order Spring 2016 Stage 4 – Public inquiry to be held (if called by the Secretary of State) 2017 – 2020 Construction Phase Level Crossing Closure Programme Feasibility Study TWAO submissions Newark & Sherwood – Norwell Lane, North An application for a Transport and Works Act Order (TWAO) for Nottinghamshire will be made and include the following crossings: Muskham, Bathley Lane and Church Lane • Scrooby, School Lane and Thomsons; • Ranskill, Torworth, Barnby Moor and Botany Bay; • Grove Road, Eaton Lane, Gamston Lane and Egmanton; • Grassthorpe, Barrel, Eaves and Carlton; • Flyfish, Cromwell Lane and Cromwell; • Norwell Lane, North Muskham, Bathley Lane and Church Lane; and • Whitehouses, Barnby and Bullpit Lane. How to respond Your comments are valued and we will consider your responses to the completed questionnaires alongside environmental, engineering design and cost considerations. We will use that information to help us design the proposed solutions that will be included in TWAO applications. Please respond to the consultation by completing the enclosed questionnaire or completing the questionnaire online at: www.networkrail.co.uk/ecmllevelcrossings Completed questionnaires can be returned to us at the public consultation events, or posted to us using
    [Show full text]
  • North Muskham Circular Route Number A631A666331 A631 5 of 20
    About the route A short ride with some hills through the peaceful villages of North and South Muskham, Cromwell, Norwell and Bathley to the North of Newark. Trent Vale Cycle Route TVCR5 Cycle Checklist: A150 North Muskham Circular Route number A631A666331 A631 5 of 20. Start Point Main Street, North Muskham. O.S. Grid Ref. SK 796588 Distance A156 Approximately 9 miles (14 kms). A57 Duration 1.5 hours + stops. A1A Signifi cant points of interest Doll Museum, Cromwell. A46 Refreshments Refreshment possibilities in route-side pubs in North Muskham, Norwell and Bathley. A177 A1 The dots show the start points of all our 20 cycle routes. Visit our website for more information. Parish Church of St Laurence Start Point: Main Street, North Muskham Route Length: Approximately 9 miles (14 kms) For more information, visit: This series of cycle rides has been developed in partnership with the Route Duration: 1.5 hours + stops www.trentvale.co.uk charity Sustrans. Route Type: Road and off road, some hills North Muskham Circular O.S. 1:50000Sheets120and121 1 Ride through village and over the Vina Cooke A1 bridge at the Northern end of North Museum of Muskham, turning immediately right down Dolls and to the A1 using the cycle track alongside Bygone Childhood – a the Northbound lane of the A1, take care wonderful collection crossing slip road, after approx. one mile of dolls dating from leave the cycle track alongside the A1 and the 18th century along enter the village of Cromwell. with Vina’s own handmade dolls. Þ Please phone Charles Chambers on j Situated on the old Great North 01636 821364 to check opening times 2012 100022432.©NextPerspectives, 100019843.Landmark Survey anddatabaserights,2012,Ordnance copyright © Crown Road, the village of Cromwell is and admission charges.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 AUGUST 2018 Application No: 18/00597/FULM Proposal
    PLANNING COMMITTEE – 7 AUGUST 2018 Application No: 18/00597/FULM Proposal: Proposed development of 12 affordable homes and 4 market bungalows (Re-submission of 16/01885/FULM) Location: Land at Main Street, North Muskham Applicant: Mrs M Wilson Registered: 5 April 2018 Target Date: 5 July 2018 Extension of time agreed in principle The application is being referred to Planning Committee for determination has been referred to Committee by the Business Manager for Growth and Regeneration due to the previous decision of the Planning Committee weighing in the planning balance to be applied in this instance. The Site The site comprises a rectangular shaped area of land of approximately 1.06 hectares which forms the north-east corner of a larger flat field currently used for arable farming. The site is bounded by Main Street to the east and its junction with Glebelands, to the north by a field access and beyond that The Old Hall and to the south and west by open arable fields. Beyond the arable field to the west is the A1. The Old Hall is Grade II listed building and to the north-east of the site is the Grade I listed parish landmark of St Wilfred’s Church. There are various historic buildings along Main Street, particularly close to the church, some of which are identified on the Nottinghamshire Historic Environment Record (HER) as Local Interest buildings. The majority of the built form of North Muskham is situated on the eastern side of Main Street, south of Nelson Lane. Whilst there is currently no defined village envelope for the village, the former 1999 Local Plan formerly identified this site as being outside the village envelope that was defined at that time, albeit could be considered to be adjacent to the boundary which ran down the eastern side of Main Street.
    [Show full text]