DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Sample Sizes Are Unweighted. All Other Sample Sizes, Including Totals, Are Weighted to Census Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Sample Sizes Are Unweighted. All Other Sample Sizes, Including Totals, Are Weighted to Census Data CPC Voter Propensity Total CPC voters Core Likely Maybe Sample size 500 237 167 96 Regional sample sizes are unweighted. All other sample sizes, including totals, are weighted to census data. Blank cells indicate zero responses were received. Cells containing “0%” are statistically zero, though at least one response was received Q1. Of these five most recent Canadian federal elections, how often have you yourself T supported Conservative Party of Canada? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Never/Not once 22% 5% 19% 71% SP Once 15% 5% 20% 29% SP More than once 29% 22% 56% SP Every recent election 34% 68% 4% SP Net: At least once 78% 95% 81% 29% Q1. Of these five most recent Canadian federal elections, how often have you yourself T supported Liberal Party of Canada? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Never/Not once 53% 76% 31% 34% SP Once 21% 16% 28% 23% SP More than once 19% 5% 35% 28% SP Every recent election 6% 3% 7% 15% SP Net: At least once 47% 24% 69% 66% Q1. Of these five most recent Canadian federal elections, how often have you yourself T supported New Democratic Party (NDP)? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Never/Not once 70% 84% 65% 48% SP Once 14% 9% 17% 23% SP More than once 13% 5% 16% 24% SP Every recent election 3% 2% 2% 5% SP Net: At least once 30% 16% 35% 52% Total CPC CPC Voter Propensity voters in Quebec Core Likely Maybe Sample size 87 19 34 34 Q1. Of these five most recent Canadian federal elections, how often have you yourself T supported Bloc Quebecois? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Never/Not once 67% 58% 71% 68% SP Once 11% 11% 12% 12% SP More than once 17% 26% 15% 15% SP Every recent election 5% 5% 3% 6% SP Net: At least once 33% 42% 29% 32% CPC Voter Propensity CPC voters Core Likely Maybe Sample size 500 237 167 96 Q1. Of these five most recent Canadian federal elections, how often have you yourself T supported Green Party of Canada? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Never/Not once 87% 91% 83% 82% SP Once 8% 5% 11% 12% SP More than once 4% 3% 5% 5% SP Every recent election 1% 2% 1% SP Net: At least once 13% 9% 17% 18% Q2. And, how likely is it that you yourself would consider voting for The Conservative Party T of Canada and Andrew Scheer in a future federal election? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe Will definitely vote for them SP 43% 91% in the future SP Will consider them 29% 9% 74% SP Might consider them 28% 26% 100% SP Top2box 72% 100% 74% SP Top3box 100% 100% 100% 100% Q2. And, how likely is it that you yourself would consider voting for The Liberal Party and T Justin Trudeau in a future federal election? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe Will definitely vote for them SP 8% 2% 12% 15% in the future SP Will consider them 19% 6% 31% 31% SP Might consider them 15% 5% 21% 29% Will definitely NOT even SP 58% 88% 36% 25% consider them in the future SP Top2box 27% 8% 43% 46% SP Top3box 42% 12% 64% 75% Q2. And, how likely is it that you yourself would consider voting for The New Democratic T Party (NDP) and Jagmeet Singh in a future federal election? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe Will definitely vote for them SP 4% 3% 4% 9% in the future SP Will consider them 12% 5% 17% 18% SP Might consider them 25% 8% 35% 48% Will definitely NOT even SP 59% 84% 44% 25% consider them in the future SP Top2box 16% 8% 21% 27% SP Top3box 41% 16% 56% 75% CPC Voter Propensity CPC voters in Quebec Core Likely Maybe Sample size 87 19 34 34 Q2. And, how likely is it that you yourself would consider voting for The Bloc Quebecois and T Mario Beaulieu in a future federal election? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe Will definitely vote for them SP 10% 11% 12% 9% in the future SP Will consider them 6% 3% 12% SP Might consider them 22% 26% 12% 29% Will definitely NOT even SP 62% 63% 74% 50% consider them in the future SP Top2box 16% 11% 15% 21% SP Top3box 38% 37% 26% 50% CPC Voter Propensity CPC voters Core Likely Maybe Sample size 500 237 167 96 Q2. And, how likely is it that you yourself would consider voting for The Green Party and T Elizabeth May in a future federal election? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe Will definitely vote for them SP 4% 2% 5% 4% in the future SP Will consider them 12% 7% 18% 12% SP Might consider them 22% 13% 25% 41% Will definitely NOT even SP 63% 78% 52% 43% consider them in the future SP Top2box 15% 9% 23% 17% SP Top3box 37% 22% 48% 57% T CPC Voter Propensity H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Maybe 19% 100% SP Likely 33% 100% SP Core 47% 100% Q3. First, please choose up to five words from the following list that you would use to T describe Conservative Party leader Andrew Scheer H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Don’t know enough to say 30% 13% 39% 58% SP Down to earth 37% 56% 28% 5% SP Honest 35% 55% 22% 8% SP Ethical 31% 50% 20% 3% SP Strategic 28% 35% 23% 21% SP Compassionate 22% 33% 15% 6% SP Strong 21% 32% 15% 4% SP Transparent 18% 27% 12% 4% SP Boring 14% 12% 18% 11% SP Influential 13% 18% 6% 12% SP Inspiring 13% 19% 7% 6% SP Charismatic 11% 13% 9% 7% SP Weak 8% 10% 6% 6% SP Unimportant 6% 3% 8% 8% SP Arrogant 5% 10% 10% SP Secretive 5% 3% 8% 4% SP Uncaring 3% *% 5% 5% SP Corrupt 2% 1% 3% 3% SP Bully 2% *% 2% 3% SP Cowardly 2% 3% 1% 1% SP Dishonest 1% *% 1% 4% Q4. [Very good job/ Good job] In your opinion, is Andrew Scheer doing a good job or a bad T job at each of the following? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe Promoting unity within the SP Conservative Party of 58% 78% 43% 33% Canada Promoting the message of SP the Conservative Party to 60% 79% 46% 36% the general public Offering voters a clear SP alternative to Justin 65% 82% 54% 39% Trudeau and the Liberals Setting the policy agenda SP for the Conservative Party 59% 78% 43% 43% of Canada Setting the Conservative SP Party up to win more seats 60% 79% 47% 38% in the next federal election Q4. [Bad job/ Very bad job] In your opinion, is Andrew Scheer doing a good job or a bad job T at each of the following? H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe Promoting unity within the SP Conservative Party of 16% 11% 22% 17% Canada Promoting the message of SP the Conservative Party to 19% 13% 26% 19% the general public Offering voters a clear SP alternative to Justin 17% 12% 24% 19% Trudeau and the Liberals Setting the policy agenda SP for the Conservative Party 12% 8% 17% 12% of Canada Setting the Conservative SP Party up to win more seats 14% 9% 21% 16% in the next federal election Q4. Andrew Scheer doing a good job or a bad job at Promoting unity within the Conservative T Party of Canada H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Very good job 20% 34% 11% 1% SP Good job 38% 44% 32% 32% SP Bad job 12% 8% 18% 11% SP Very bad job 4% 3% 4% 5% SP Not sure/ Can’t say 26% 11% 35% 50% SP Top2box 58% 78% 43% 33% SP Bad2box 16% 11% 22% 17% Q4. Andrew Scheer doing a good job or a bad job at Promoting the message of the T Conservative Party to the general public H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Very good job 18% 30% 10% SP Good job 42% 49% 36% 36% SP Bad job 16% 11% 23% 18% SP Very bad job 2% 2% 4% 1% SP Not sure/ Can’t say 22% 8% 28% 45% SP Top2box 60% 79% 46% 36% SP Bad2box 19% 13% 26% 19% Q4. Andrew Scheer doing a good job or a bad job at Offering voters a clear alternative to T Justin Trudeau and the Liberals H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Very good job 29% 50% 13% 4% SP Good job 36% 32% 42% 34% SP Bad job 13% 8% 20% 15% SP Very bad job 4% 4% 4% 4% SP Not sure/ Can’t say 18% 6% 22% 43% SP Top2box 65% 82% 54% 39% SP Bad2box 17% 12% 24% 19% Q4. Andrew Scheer doing a good job or a bad job at Setting the policy agenda for the T Conservative Party of Canada H CPC Voter Propensity Total HE Core Likely Maybe SP Very good job 17% 28% 10% 3% SP Good job 42% 50% 33% 40% SP Bad job 10% 6% 16% 9% SP Very bad job 2% 2% 2% 3% SP Not sure/ Can’t say 29% 14% 40% 45% SP Top2box 59% 78% 43% 43% SP Bad2box 12% 8% 17% 12% Q4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core 1..84 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 148 Ï NUMBER 125 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 42nd PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, December 9, 2016 Speaker: The Honourable Geoff Regan CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 7883 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, December 9, 2016 The House met at 10 a.m. Even the CEOs themselves do not really benefit from this trend. An extra million dollars does not make a material difference in their standard of living. Really, they are concerned about their relative position compared to other CEOs, so if a CEO gets paid more it Prayer increases his or her position on the league tables only by reducing the position of other CEOs. Our economy would be stronger, and even corporate Canada itself would be better off with government GOVERNMENT ORDERS regulation to limit CEO compensation. Ï (1005) [English] Bill C-25 includes some minor improvements to corporate governance, but what is missing is the mandatory and binding say CANADA BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT on pay provisions that we find in other advanced economies. Currently, Canadian companies can consult shareholders on The House resumed from November 25 consideration of the executive compensation, but they are not bound by the results of motion that Bill C-25, An Act to amend the Canada Business those votes. The NDP is going to propose amendments to Bill C-25 Corporations Act, the Canada Cooperatives Act, the Canada Not-for- to include mandatory and binding say on pay provisions to limit profit Corporations Act, and the Competition Act, be read the second executive compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Mps on the Hill Names Political Affiliation Constituency
    List of MPs on the Hill Names Political Affiliation Constituency Adam Vaughan Liberal Spadina – Fort York, ON Alaina Lockhart Liberal Fundy Royal, NB Ali Ehsassi Liberal Willowdale, ON Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan – Malahat – Langford, BC Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, BC Arnold Viersen Conservative Peace River – Westlock, AB Bill Casey Liberal Cumberland Colchester, NS Bob Benzen Conservative Calgary Heritage, AB Bob Zimmer Conservative Prince George – Peace River – Northern Rockies, BC Carol Hughes NDP Algoma – Manitoulin – Kapuskasing, ON Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton – Melville, SK Cathy McLeod Conservative Kamloops – Thompson – Cariboo, BC Celina Ceasar-Chavannes Liberal Whitby, ON Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew – Nipissing – Pembroke, ON Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON Christine Moore NDP Abitibi – Témiscamingue, QC Dan Ruimy Liberal Pitt Meadows – Maple Ridge, BC Dan Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent – Leamington, ON Dan Vandal Liberal Saint Boniface – Saint Vital, MB Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood – Transcona, MB Darrell Samson Liberal Sackville – Preston – Chezzetcook, NS Darren Fisher Liberal Darthmouth – Cole Harbour, NS David Anderson Conservative Cypress Hills – Grasslands, SK David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON David Graham Liberal Laurentides – Labelle, QC David Sweet Conservative Flamborough – Glanbrook, ON David Tilson Conservative Dufferin – Caledon, ON David Yurdiga Conservative Fort McMurray – Cold Lake, AB Deborah Schulte Liberal King – Vaughan, ON Earl Dreeshen Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan Election Review Panel Report
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents Faculty Scholarship 4-2021 Saskatchewan 2024: Making Change Happen - New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan Election Review Panel Report Gerry Scott Judy Bradley Modeste McKenzie Craig M. Scott Brian Topp Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/reports Part of the Election Law Commons Repository Citation Scott, Gerry; Bradley, Judy; McKenzie, Modeste; Scott, Craig M.; and Topp, Brian, "Saskatchewan 2024: Making Change Happen - New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan Election Review Panel Report" (New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan, 2021). Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents. Paper 217. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/reports/217 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. Saskatchewan 2024: Making Change Happen New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan Election Review Panel Report April 2021 This page has been intentionally left blank. Index Introduction and Executive Summary ........................................................................page 3 Part 1: Our Results 1. Eligible voter turnout in Saskatchewan has declined .............................................page 8 2. The NDP is struggling to rebuild its caucus ...........................................................page 9 3. A regional breakdown tells a more complex story ...............................................page 10 4. Conservatives enjoy a massive fundraising advantage.........................................page 11 5. Party membership has steadily declined since its peak in 1991 ...........................page 12 Part 2: Why These Results? Political issues: 1. The so-called “Saskatchewan Party” proved to be a loyal pupil of the NDP .......page 14 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Election Report Card: Will the Trudeau Government Deliver on Its Raised Expectations?
    2018 ELECTION REPORT CARD: WILL THE TRUDEAU GOVERNMENT DELIVER ON ITS RAISED EXPECTATIONS? By Shane Mackenzie & Jesse Robichaud Three years on from 2015 – campaign strategists are turning their attention to the 2019 federal election. For Prime Minister Trudeau’s incumbent Liberals, the strategic path to re-election will look different than the party’s vault from third place to a resounding pan-Canadian victory last time. The Way Things Were The promise of hope and renewed confidence in government was palpable when voters turned out en masse to elect MPs from Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party. The mere idea that “better is always possible!” gained traction with an electorate whose expectations had been steadily managed downward by the Harper government’s “no nonsense” decade at the helm. A previously struggling Liberal voter base came to life when the party’s candidates and their leader framed their platform of “real change” promises as a return to openness, evidence-based policy, climate action, large-scale investment, reconciliation, equality, support for families, and diversity. The Way Things Are No good deed goes unpunished, and for Trudeau there will undoubtedly be a political price to pay for raising the bar for what voters should expect from their government. Indeed, the success standard set for Trudeau is higher than in some past elections. And he set it himself. Once the bar has been raised, it’s impossible to lower it again – and it’s also harder to clear it consistently, as we have seen with issues like electoral reform, climate policy, pipelines, and relations with provincial governments.
    [Show full text]
  • November 30, 2017 Hansard
    SECOND SESSION - TWENTY-EIGHTH LEGISLATURE of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan ____________ DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS ____________ (HANSARD) Published under the authority of The Hon. Corey Tochor Speaker N.S. VOL. 59 NO. 21A THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2017, 10:00 MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF SASKATCHEWAN 2nd Session — 28th Legislature Speaker — Hon. Corey Tochor Premier — Hon. Brad Wall Leader of the Opposition — Nicole Sarauer Beaudry-Mellor, Tina — Regina University (SP) McCall, Warren — Regina Elphinstone-Centre (NDP) Beck, Carla — Regina Lakeview (NDP) McMorris, Don — Indian Head-Milestone (SP) Belanger, Buckley — Athabasca (NDP) Meili, Ryan — Saskatoon Meewasin (NDP) Bonk, Hon. Steven — Moosomin (SP) Merriman, Hon. Paul — Saskatoon Silverspring-Sutherland (SP) Bradshaw, Fred — Carrot River Valley (SP) Michelson, Warren — Moose Jaw North (SP) Brkich, Hon. Greg — Arm River (SP) Moe, Scott — Rosthern-Shellbrook (SP) Buckingham, David — Saskatoon Westview (SP) Morgan, Hon. Don — Saskatoon Southeast (SP) Carr, Lori — Estevan (SP) Mowat, Vicki — Saskatoon Fairview (NDP) Chartier, Danielle — Saskatoon Riversdale (NDP) Nerlien, Hugh — Kelvington-Wadena (SP) Cheveldayoff, Ken — Saskatoon Willowgrove (SP) Olauson, Eric — Saskatoon University (SP) Cox, Hon. Herb — The Battlefords (SP) Ottenbreit, Hon. Greg — Yorkton (SP) D’Autremont, Dan — Cannington (SP) Rancourt, Nicole — Prince Albert Northcote (NDP) Dennis, Terry — Canora-Pelly (SP) Reiter, Hon. Jim — Rosetown-Elrose (SP) Docherty, Mark — Regina Coronation Park (SP) Ross, Laura — Regina Rochdale (SP) Doherty, Kevin — Regina Northeast (SP) Sarauer, Nicole — Regina Douglas Park (NDP) Doke, Hon. Larry — Cut Knife-Turtleford (SP) Sproule, Cathy — Saskatoon Nutana (NDP) Duncan, Hon. Dustin — Weyburn-Big Muddy (SP) Steele, Doug — Cypress Hills (SP) Eyre, Hon. Bronwyn — Saskatoon Stonebridge-Dakota (SP) Steinley, Warren — Regina Walsh Acres (SP) Fiaz, Muhammad — Regina Pasqua (SP) Stewart, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 148 Ï NUMBER 074 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 42nd PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, June 16, 2016 Speaker: The Honourable Geoff Regan CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 4597 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, June 16, 2016 The House met at 10 a.m. GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to Prayer table, in both official languages, the government's response to four petitions. Ï (1005) *** [Translation] ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE Hon. Ralph Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emer- The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a gency Preparedness, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to table, message has been received from the Senate informing this House in both official languages, the 2015 annual report of the RCMP's use that the Senate has passed Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal of the law enforcement justification provisions. This report addresses Code and to make related amendments to other Acts (medical the RCMP's use of specified provisions within the law enforcement assistance in dying), with amendments to which the concurrence of justification regime, which is set out in section 25.1 to 25.4 of the this House is desired. Copies of the amendments are available at the Criminal Code. table. This report also documents the nature of the investigations in [English] which these provisions were used.
    [Show full text]
  • HANSARD) Published Under the Authority of the Hon
    SECOND SESSION - TWENTY-SEVENTH LEGISLATURE of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan ____________ DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS ____________ (HANSARD) Published under the authority of The Hon. Dan D’Autremont Speaker N.S. VOL. 55 NO. 4B TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2012, 7 p.m. MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF SASKATCHEWAN Speaker — Hon. Dan D’Autremont Premier — Hon. Brad Wall Leader of the Opposition — John Nilson Name of Member Political Affiliation Constituency Belanger, Buckley NDP Athabasca Bjornerud, Bob SP Melville-Saltcoats Boyd, Hon. Bill SP Kindersley Bradshaw, Fred SP Carrot River Valley Brkich, Greg SP Arm River-Watrous Broten, Cam NDP Saskatoon Massey Place Campeau, Jennifer SP Saskatoon Fairview Chartier, Danielle NDP Saskatoon Riversdale Cheveldayoff, Hon. Ken SP Saskatoon Silver Springs Cox, Herb SP The Battlefords D’Autremont, Hon. Dan SP Cannington Docherty, Mark SP Regina Coronation Park Doherty, Hon. Kevin SP Regina Northeast Doke, Larry SP Cut Knife-Turtleford Draude, Hon. June SP Kelvington-Wadena Duncan, Hon. Dustin SP Weyburn-Big Muddy Eagles, Doreen SP Estevan Elhard, Hon. Wayne SP Cypress Hills Forbes, David NDP Saskatoon Centre Harpauer, Hon. Donna SP Humboldt Harrison, Jeremy SP Meadow Lake Hart, Glen SP Last Mountain-Touchwood Heppner, Hon. Nancy SP Martensville Hickie, Darryl SP Prince Albert Carlton Hutchinson, Bill SP Regina South Huyghebaert, D.F. (Yogi) SP Wood River Jurgens, Victoria SP Prince Albert Northcote Kirsch, Delbert SP Batoche Krawetz, Hon. Ken SP Canora-Pelly Lawrence, Greg SP Moose Jaw Wakamow Makowsky, Gene SP Regina Dewdney Marchuk, Hon. Russ SP Regina Douglas Park McCall, Warren NDP Regina Elphinstone-Centre McMillan, Hon. Tim SP Lloydminster McMorris, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Corporate Power in Saskatchewan
    Mapping Corporate Power in Saskatchewan Mapping Corporate Power in Saskatchewan December 2012 This publication is a collaborative research effort between the Saskatchewan Office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA SK), the Regina Public Interest Group (RPIRG) and the Community Research Unit (CRU) at the University of Regina. The primary research was compiled and coordinated by Dr. Simon Enoch, Director of CCPA Saskatchewan. Tahsina Taz Kabir provided invaluable technical support and assistance with the UCINet software program. Dr. Simon Enoch holds a PhD in Communication and Culture from Ryerson University in Toronto. He also holds a MA in Work and Society from McMaster University and a BA Honours in Political Science from the University of Regina. He has previously published in Foucault Studies, Theory and Science, State of Nature, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism and Cultural Logic. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Jenn Bergen and Naomi Beingessner of RPIRG and to Yolanda Hansen and Stacey Shand of the CRU for their patience and support in sheparding this work to publication. Claire Polster and Peter Gilmer of the CRU also provided invaluable assistance and support in the intial planning and conceptual stages of the project. We also owe a debt of gratitude to the peer reviewers for their suggestions and insights on earlier drafts of this report. As the primary author of the report, all errors and/or omissions are the sole responsibility of the Saskatchewan Office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. About RPIRG The Regina Public Interest Research Group (RPIRG) is a student-run, student-funded non-profit organization dedicated to community-based research, education, action and awareness in the public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Big on Talk, Light on Action, Observers Say Heating
    PM on anti-Black racism: Lisa Van Dusen: Staff Where Watergate changes Big on talk, and Trump’s for light on action, White House Minister Heating Gould observers say hiccups leave collide p. 9 diplomats p. 15 out in Everything you wanted to know about the cold the PCO but were p. 6 p. 4 afraid to ask p. 7 TWENTY-NINTH YEAR, NO. 1505 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2018 $5.00 News Byelections News Harassment allegations Itching to regain Mulcair’s NDP MPs back leader’s decision to ‘symbolic’ Montreal riding investigate caucus colleague Erin Weir from NDP, Hill staff er is The NDP MP has denied harassment complaints and said fi rst in expected crowded he doesn’t know what allegations the party is investigating. Liberal nomination race BY SAMANTHA WRIGHT ALLEN DP leader Jagmeet Singh’s decision to announce Nthat he had appointed a third-party investigator to look into harassment allegations against NDP MP Erin Weir, and to remove the MP from caucus duties, was a “wise move,” “necessary,” and took the “right tone,” say caucus colleagues, though Mr. Weir has said he doesn’t know what is being alleged and a directly affected complainant had not as of last week come forward. Continued on page 12 News #MeToo & Politics Kinsella’s ‘affi davits’ column prompts speculation, PM, party Rachel Bendayan, pictured in 2015 as the Liberal Party candidate for Outremont, leaders asked about Que., with Liberal leader Justin Trudeau, will again sexual conduct as vie for a nomination in the Publications Mail Agreement #40068926 riding.
    [Show full text]
  • Saskatchewan Members.Xlsx
    Name Constituency Constituence Email Address Ottawa Email Address Province / Territory Political Affiliation Phone Constituency Office David Anderson Cypress Hills—Grasslands [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Sheri Benson Saskatoon West [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan NDP Kelly Block Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Hon. Ralph Goodale Regina—Wascana [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Liberal 306.585.2202 Randy Hoback Prince Albert [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Georgina Jolibois Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan NDP Robert Kitchen Souris—Moose Mountain [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Tom Lukiwski Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Hon. Gerry Ritz Battlefords—Lloydminster [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Andrew Scheer Regina—Qu'Appelle [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Brad Trost Saskatoon—University [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Cathay Wagantall Yorkton—Melville [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Kevin Waugh Saskatoon—Grasswood [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan Conservative Erin Weir Regina—Lewvan [email protected] [email protected] Saskatchewan NDP Hon. Bill Morneau Toronto Centre [email protected] [email protected] Ontario Liberal 320 Gardiner Park Court Regina, SK S4V 1R9 [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers Biographies Note: Publications Or Organizations That
    Speakers Biographies Note: Publications or organizations that are underlined are hyperlinked. Brigette Alepin Brigette Alepin is a Harvard-trained chartered accountant and tax specialist with extensive public and private-sector experience. She has been hired by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance in Ottawa to investigate tax evasion and tax havens and by the Quebec's Health and Welfare Commissioner to quantify the cost of the province's healthcare system. The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants have invited her to present the findings of major studies to governments, and she often appears as an expert witness before House of Commons finance committees. She is a lecturer on taxation and tax policy at the Université du Québec, a frequent media commentator, and a regular contributor to CA Magazine (the journal of Chartered Accountants of Canada). Her most recent work in French is Ces riches qui ne paient pas d’impôts and is coming out soon in English under the title Bill Gates, Pay Your Fair Share of Taxes...Like We Do!. Sarah Anderson Sarah Anderson is Director of Global Economy with the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington DC. Her current work includes research, writing, and networking on issues related to the impact of international trade, finance, and investment policies on inequality, sustainability, and human rights. Sarah is a well-known expert on executive compensation, and has co-authored several books. Sarah has also been a consultant to the U.S. Agency for International Development (1989-1992) and an editor for the Deutsche Presse-Agentur (1988). She holds a Masters in International Affairs from The American University and a BA in Journalism from Northwestern University.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is an Example of A
    CREATING THE CONDITIONS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH: TOOLS FOR PEOPLE, BUSINESSES AND COMMUNITIES Report of the Standing Committee on Finance Hon. Wayne Easter Chair DECEMBER 2016 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]