DOCSLIB.ORG

San Juan County / WRIA2 Lead Entity Program for Salmon Recovery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Juan County / WRIA2 Lead Entity Program for Salmon Recovery San Juan County / WRIA2 Lead Entity Program for Salmon Recovery Barbara Rosenkotter Lead Entity Coordinator 360-370-7593 [email protected] www.sjcmrc.org/Projects/Salmon-Recovery.aspx Photo: Rick Gould WRIA2 Recovery Plan Hypotheses San Juans provide important nearshore and marine habitat for salmon San Juans provide forage for salmon Part of the challenge is understanding how salmon use different habitats at different times in their life cycle. Name Source (Date) Geomorphic shoreform mapping for SJC Coastal Geologic Services (2010) Modification Inventory Restoration Opportunities Friends of the San Juans (FSJ 2011) Existing data Shoreline Modification Inventory for SJC FSJ (2010) Eelgrass (outer line) Mapping for San Juan County FSJ, DNR and UW (2004) Puget Sound Change Analysis Geodatabase PSNERP (2009) Bull kelp classification FSJ, DNR and UW (2007) Forage fish spawning habitat WDFW and FSJ (2004) Nearshore fish utilization Beamer and Fresh (2012) Herring spawning grounds WDFW, priority habitats and species Geomorphic shoreform PSNERP (2009) Shipman (2008) typology Geomorphic shoreform RITT adaption of Shipman (2012) Parcel link SJC GIS Library Land Use Designation SJC GIS Library Shoreline Master program designation (current) SJC GIS Library (2011) LiDAR DEM SJC Public Works (2009) SJC Structure Layer SJC Public Works (2012) Stream Typing Wild Fish Conservancy (2010) Streams SJC GIS Library Salmon Habitat Protection Blueprint FSJ, San Juan Preservation Trust and SJC Land Bank (2008) Tide Data NOAA Washington State ShoreZone Inventory DNR (2001) High resolution Infrared vertical aerial photographs DNR (2004), FSJ and DNR (2006) High resolution oblique aerial photographs WA Department of Ecology (2002) High resolution vertical aerial photographs WA Department of Ecology (2008) Pulling It All Together “Pulling It All Together” Project - to bring these various assessments and data sets together and to analyze and use the assessment information to prioritize protection and restoration actions for San Juan County. PIAT Project Process Source: Friends of the San Juans PIAT Fish Use Prioritization Source: Friends of the San Juans WRIA 2 (Mixed Stock Rearing) Nearshore Habitat Juvenile Salmon Project Questions: When are juvenile salmon present and how long are they present? Where are juvenile salmon found within each area by habitat type? What is the origin (river or stock) of salmon present in each area? Primary Investigators: Eric Beamer, Skagit River System Cooperative and Kurt Fresh, NOAA Fisheries When are juvenile Chinook salmon present and how long are they present? Wild juvenile Chinook Salmon 80% 60% 40% 33.0% 18.1% 17.8% 18.5% 20% 4.4% 2.9% 5.3% Percent of Season's Catch of Season's Percent 0.0% 0% Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Hatchery juvenile Chinook Salmon 76.5% 80% 60% 40% 20% 10.7% 4.8% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% Percent of Season's Catch of Season's Percent 0% Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Source: Beamer / Fresh Juvenile Wild Chinook salmon Juvenile Wild Chinook Salmon 1000 100 fish/ha 10 1 barrier beach bluff backed pocket beach pocket estuary rocky shoreline beach like Source: Beamer / Fresh Pacific Sand Lance 1000000 100000 10000 fish/ha 1000 100 10 barrier beach bluff backed pocket beach pocket estuary rocky beach like shoreline Source: Beamer / Fresh Herring 100000 10000 1000 fish/ha 100 10 1 barrier beach bluff backed pocket beach pocket estuary rocky beach like shoreline Source: Beamer / Fresh Juvenile Chinook Map shows the likelihood (probability) of finding a juvenile Chinook salmon in the San Juans Values possible: 0 – 1 Value range: 0.057 – 0.563 . “Best” areas are Waldron & S. Lopez areas . However, no place in the San Juans has a probability of zero . But, some places are 10 times higher Juvenile Sand Lance Juvenile Herring Juvenile Surf Smelt PIAT Fish Use Geographic Prioritization Three Factors (equally weighted): Juvenile Chinook presence probability Rearing forage fish presence probability (herring, surf smelt and sand lance combined) Documented forage fish (surf smelt and sand lance) spawning habitat presence Fish use geographic prioritizationResults: Priority Shoreforms • Pocket beaches • Transport Zones • Feeder bluffs • Barrier beaches • Rocky • Embayment Results: Priority Landscape Regions Highest: Waldron/President channel Rosario SW Juan de Fuca-S.Lopez Haro Strait NE Regions prioritized by the abundance of highest and high priority fish use shoreforms. Degradation Analysis and Identification of Protection and Restoration Actions Source: Friends of the San Juans Identify Shoreline Stressors Armor Tidal barriers Roads Jetties Marinas Groins Overwater structures Boat ramps Impervious surface Shoreline Stressors- count stressor count 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 armor tidal barrier road ows jetties marina ramp groins Source: Friends of the San Juans Shoreline Stressors- length stressor length miles 25 20 15 10 5 0 armor tidal barrier road ows jetties marina ramp groins Source: Friends of the San Juans Top stressors- shoreforms with stressors count 200 180 160 140 Shoreform with stressor - length 120 armor road 100 ows 80 tidal barriers 60 40 20 0 Artificial Barrier beach embay-e embay-l Feeder Bluff Pocket beach Rocky Transport zone Source: Friends of the San Juans Top stressors- shoreforms with stressors length 25000 20000 15000 armor road ows 10000 tidal barriers 5000 0 Artificial Barrier beach embay-e embay-l Feeder Bluff Pocket beach Rocky Transport zone Source: Friends of the San Juans Nearshore Process Degradation Analysis Measure of degradation or intactness at the shoreform scale. Processes Evaluated: • coastal sediment dynamics, • wind and waves, • tidal hydrology, • freshwater hydrology, • tidal channel formation and maintenance, • detritus potential, • solar radiation :Outcomes For each individual shoreform: sum of process degradation; normalized (sum divided by the # of processes); % of degradation; # of stressors; type of stressor. Nearshore Process Degradation Most impacted areas on ferry- serviced islands near urban growth areas, villages, marinas, bays, etc. Identify Priority Areas for Protection and Restoration Actions Source: Friends of the San Juans Priority Salmon Recovery Regions Maps and Findings 1. Waldron / President Channel 2. Rosario SW 3. Juan de Fuca / S. Lopez 4. Haro Strait NE Source: Friends of the San Juans 1. Waldron / President Channel Source: Friends of the San Juans 1. Waldron / President Channel Landscape Region The top salmon recovery action for this region is protection. With virtually all shorelines ranked as top or medium protection priorities, restoration of the minimally degraded sites in this region is also a top salmon recovery priority for San Juan County. The Waldron Island and NW Orcas sections of this region are dominated by drift cell systems, while the Sucia Island and West Orcas Island regions consist primary of rocky shores and pocket beaches. Highest correlation with existing protection priorities. Significant public ownership. Highest sea level rise resiliency. 2. Rosario SW Source: Friends of the San Juans 2. Rosario Channel SW Landscape Region High percentage of protection priority shoreforms. Rocky shores, pocket beaches and drift cell systems. Nearly all shoreline ranked as high or medium protection priority (north) and areas of low degradation that are top restoration (and medium protection) priorities (south). Highly degraded shoreforms are extremely limited. Scattered public ownership. Significant overlap with existing restoration priorities for restoration projects along the east shorelines of Decatur. Second highest long -term priorities based on SLR resiliency, as well as one site (Decatur Island) where enhancement action can improve resiliency to sea level rise. 3. Juan de Fuca / S. Lopez Source: Friends of the San Juans 3. Strait of Juan de Fuca / S. Lopez Landscape Region Balanced combination of protection and restoration needs. Exclusively rocky shores and extensive pocket beaches. High percentage of high protection priority shoreforms. Multiple feasible priority restoration opportunities at pocket beaches with low degradations scores. While the majority of the region has degradation scores of zero or low, considerable areas of highly degraded shores also exist along Agate Beach, Barlow Bay and MacKaye Harbor. Some long term resiliency to sea level rise, primary smaller, dispersed intact or low degradation pocket beaches. There is some public ownership in the region. Some overlap with existing priorities, especially protection. 4. Haro Strait NE Source: Friends of the San Juans 4. Haro Strait NE Landscape Region Primary salmon recovery need in this region is restoration. Few fully intact areas (rocky western shore along Haro Strait). Highly diverse, with all shoreforms represented. Rocky shores the areas with minimal process degradation. Pocket beaches and drift cells are moderate to highly degraded. Substantial integrated restoration priorities, the largest amount of any region in the county, mostly concentrated at the northern half of the region (westcott, garrison, mitchell bays). Limited public ownership in this region, primarily located at English Camp National park. Many small sites resilient to sea level rise; a few protection and most restoration priorities, mostly on pocket beaches. PIAT Project Team Project Partners: Friends of the San Juans, Anchor QEA and Coastal Geologic Services. GIS contractors: Jim Slocomb and Sally Hawkins. Technical Team:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Application of a Coastal Vulnerability Index. a Case Study Along the Apulian Coastline, Italy
    water Article Application of a Coastal Vulnerability Index. A Case Study along the Apulian Coastline, Italy Daniela Pantusa 1,* , Felice D’Alessandro 1, Luigia Riefolo 2 , Francesca Principato 3 and Giuseppe Roberto Tomasicchio 1 1 Innovation Engineering Department, University of Salento, I-73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] (F.D.); [email protected] (G.R.T.) 2 Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, I-81031 Aversa, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, I-87036 Arcavacata di Rende, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0832-29-7795 Received: 4 July 2018; Accepted: 5 September 2018; Published: 10 September 2018 Abstract: The coastal vulnerability index (CVI) is a popular index in literature to assess the coastal vulnerability of climate change. The present paper proposes a CVI formulation to make it suitable for the Mediterranean coasts; the formulation considers ten variables divided into three typological groups: geological; physical process and vegetation. In particular, the geological variables are: geomorphology; shoreline erosion/accretion rates; coastal slope; emerged beach width and dune width. The physical process variables are relative sea-level change; mean significant wave height and mean tide range. The vegetation variables are width of vegetation behind the beach and posidonia oceanica. The first application of the proposed index was carried out for a stretch of the Apulia region coast, in the south of Italy; this application allowed to (i) identify the transects most vulnerable to sea level rise, storm surges and waves action and (ii) consider the usefulness of the index as a tool for orientation in planning strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallop Et Al., 2013
    Marine Geology 344 (2013) 132–143 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margeo The influence of coastal reefs on spatial variability in seasonal sand fluxes Shari L. Gallop a,b,⁎, Cyprien Bosserelle b,c, Ian Eliot d, Charitha B. Pattiaratchi b a Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK b School of Environmental Systems Engineering and The UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, MO15, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia c Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Applied Geoscience and Technology Division (SOPAC), Private Mail Bag, GPO, Suva, Fiji Islands d Damara WA Pty Ltd, PO Box 1299, Innaloo, WA 6018, Australia article info abstract Article history: The effect of coastal reefs on seasonal erosion and accretion was investigated on 2 km of sandy coast. The focus Received 21 June 2012 was on how reef topography drives alongshore variation in the mode and magnitude of seasonal beach erosion Received in revised form 11 July 2013 and accretion; and the effect of intra- and inter-annual variability in metocean conditions on seasonal sediment Accepted 23 July 2013 fluxes. This involved using monthly and 6-monthly surveys of the beach and coastal zone, and comparison with a Available online 2 August 2013 range of metocean conditions including mean sea level, storm surges, wind, and wave power. Alongshore ‘zones’ Communicated by J.T. Wells were revealed with alternating modes of sediment transport in spring and summer compared to autumn and winter. Zone boundaries were determined by rock headlands and reefs interrupting littoral drift; the seasonal Keywords: build up of sand over the reef in the south zone; and current jets generated by wave set-up over reefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Shoreline Sea Level Resiliency: Performance and Adaptive Management of Existing Breakwater Sites, Year 2 Summary Report
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 11-2019 Living Shoreline Sea Level Resiliency: Performance and Adaptive Management of Existing Breakwater Sites, Year 2 Summary Report C. Scott Hardaway Jr. Virginia Institute of Marine Science Donna A. Milligan Virginia Institute of Marine Science Christine A. Wilcox Virginia Institute of Marine Science Angela C. Milligan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Hardaway, C., Milligan, D. A., Wilcox, C. A., & Milligan, A. C. (2019) Living Shoreline Sea Level Resiliency: Performance and Adaptive Management of Existing Breakwater Sites, Year 2 Summary Report. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://doi.org/10.25773/jpxn-r132 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Living Shoreline Sea Level Resiliency: Performance and Adaptive Management of Existing Breakwater Sites November 2019 Living Shoreline Sea‐Level Resiliency: Performance and Adaptive Management of Existing Breakwater Sites Year 2 Summary Report C. Scott Hardaway, Jr. Donna A. Milligan Christine A. Wilcox Angela C. Milligan Shoreline Studies Program Virginia Institute of Marine Science William & Mary This project was funded by the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program at the Department of Environmental Quality through Grant # NA18NOS4190152 Task 82 of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Environments Oil Spills and , Clean-Up Programs in the Bay Of
    Fisheries Pee hes and Environment et Environnement •• Canada Canada Coastal. Environments Oil Spills and ,Clean-up Programs in the Bay of Fundy Economic and Technical Review Report EPS-3-EC-77-9 Environmental Impact Control Directorate February, 1977 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SERVICE REPORT SERIES Economic and Technical Review Reports relate to state-of-the-art reviews, library surveys, industr1al, and their associated recommen­ dations where no experimental work is involved. These reports are undertaken either by an outside agency or by staff of the Environmental Protection Service. Other categories in ~he EPS series include such groups as Regu­ lations, Codes, and Protocols; Policy and Planning; Technology Deve- lopment; Surveillance; Briefs anr 1issions to Public Inquiries; and Environmental Impact and Asses' Inquiries ~ertaining to Environmental Protection Service should be directed to the Environmental Protection Service, Department of the Environment, Ottawa, KlA 1C8, Ontario, Canada. ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1977 Cat. No.: En 46-3/77-9 ISBN 0-662-00594-5 \ COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS, OIL SPILLS AND CLEAN-UP PROGRAMMES IN THE BAY OF FUNDY E.H. Owens John A. Leslie and Associates Bedford, Nova Scotia A Report Submitted to: Environmental Protection Service - Atlantic Region Halifax, Nova Scotia February 1977 EPS-3-EC-77-9 REVIEW NOTICE This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Conservation Directorate, Environmental Protection Service, and approved for pu­ blication. Approval does not necessarily signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Service. Mention of trade names and commercial products does not constitute endorsement for use. - iii - ABSTRACT The Bay of Fundy has a coastline of approximately 1400 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Perched Beaches Computational Modelling and Calibration in Delft3d
    Pocket perched beaches Computational modelling and calibration in Delft3D REPORT Status: FINAL MSc Thesis F.J.H. Olijslagers September 2003 Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Section of Hydraulic Engineering Pocket perched beaches Computational modelling and calibration in Delft3D Status: FINAL MSc Thesis F.J.H. Olijslagers September 2003 Thesis committee: Prof. dr. ir. M.J.F. Stive, Delft University of Technology Dr. ir. J. van de Graaff, Delft University of Technology Ir. J.H. de Vroeg, WL | Delft Hydraulics Ir. A. Mol, Lievense Consulting Engineers, Breda Drs. P.J.T. Dankers, Delft University of Technology Preface Preface This thesis is the finishing part of the MSc program on the faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences at Delft University of Technology. The study took place under the supervision of Prof. Stive of the section of hydraulic engineering. The work is carried out at Lievense Consulting Engineers in Breda and at the department of Marine and Coastal Infrastructure (MCI) of WL | Delft Hydraulics. This report is aimed to scientists, engineers and other people that are interested in this matter. Special thanks go out to all the thesis committee members in particular, all the employees of Lievense Consulting Engineers for their help, facilities and information on the Third Harbour project, WL | Delft Hydraulics for the facilities, all the people of MCI and MCM of WL | Delft Hydraulics and Dano Roelvink in particular for his support on Delft3D, all the graduating students at WL | Delft Hydraulics for their help and the stimulating environment. Paul Olijslagers Delft, September 1, 2003 i Summary Summary This study was initiated by Lievense Consulting Engineers, who were involved in the Third Harbour project in IJmuiden, the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Beach Hydrodynamics: the Example of Four Macrotidal Beaches, Brittany, France
    Marine Geology 266 (2009) 1–17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margeo Pocket beach hydrodynamics: The example of four macrotidal beaches, Brittany, France A. Dehouck a,⁎, H. Dupuis b, N. Sénéchal b a Géomer, UMR 6554 LETG CNRS, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, Technopôle Brest Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France b UMR 5805 EPOC CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, avenue des facultés, 33405 Talence cedex, France article info abstract Article history: During several field experiments, measurements of waves and currents as well as topographic surveys were Received 24 February 2009 conducted on four morphologically-contrasted macrotidal beaches along the rocky Iroise coastline in Brittany Received in revised form 6 July 2009 (France). These datasets provide new insight on the hydrodynamics of pocket beaches, which are rather poorly Accepted 10 July 2009 documented compared to wide and open beaches. The results notably highlight a cross-shore gradient in the Available online 18 July 2009 magnitude of tidal currents which are relatively strong offshore of the beaches but are insignificant inshore. Communicated by J.T. Wells Despite the macrotidal setting, the hydrodynamics of these beaches are thus totally wave-driven in the intertidal zone. The crucial role of wind forcing is emphasized for both moderately and highly protected beaches, as this Keywords: mechanism drives mean currents two to three times stronger than those due to more energetic swells when beach morphodynamics winds blow nearly parallel to the shoreline. Moreover, the mean alongshore current appears to be essentially embayed beach wind-driven, wind waves being superimposed on shore-normal oceanic swells during storms, and variations in beach cusps their magnitude being coherent with those of the wind direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program Advancing Nearshore Protection and Restoration 2012 Program Report Program Overview History and Vision
    Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program Advancing Nearshore Protection and Restoration 2012 Program Report Program Overview History and Vision In 2006, the state Legislature, with the broad support of governmental, tribal, non-profit and private representatives from the region, created the Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program (ESRP) to advance nearshore restoration and to support salmon recovery. The program is managed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), in partnership with the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO). It provides grant funding and technical assistance for restoration and protection projects within the nearshore of Puget Sound. A lasting solution, not a band-aid ESRP’s mission is to protect and restore the natural processes such as tidal flow, freshwater input, and sediment input and delivery that create and sustain habitats in Puget Sound. Projects funded by ESRP focus on removing the underlying causes of degradation such as shoreline armoring, dikes, blocked or undersized culverts, and other physical structures, thereby restoring the very processes that created Puget Sound’s rich and productive ecosystems. By addressing the underlying causes, not just the symptoms, ESRP sets in motion projects that are sustainable over time. 2 Photo courtesy Paul Cereghino, NOAA Contents Program overview ................................................................ 2 Protecting and restoring Puget Sound ........................................... 4 Putting people and Puget Sound back to work .................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Coastal Reefs on Spatial Variability In
    Our reference: MARGO 4964 P-authorquery-v11 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Journal: MARGO Please e-mail or fax your responses and any corrections to: Shanmuga Sundaram, Jananii E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +1 619 699 6721 Article Number: 4964 Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file. To ensure fast publication of your paper please return your corrections within 48 hours. For correction or revision of any artwork, please consult http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions. Any queries or remarks that have arisen during the processing of your manuscript are listed below and highlighted by flags in the proof. Click on the ‘Q’ link to go to the location in the proof. Location in article Query / Remark: click on the Q link to go Please insert your reply or correction at the corresponding line in the proof Q1 Please confirm that given names and surnames have been identified correctly. Q2 The citation “Kraus and Galgano, 2011” has been changed to match the author name/date in the reference list. Please check here and in subsequent occurrences, and correct if necessary. Q3 Hughes and Heap, 2010 was mentioned here but not in the reference list, however Hughes and Heap was included in the list but was uncited in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Ombrone River Delta Evolution Through Beach Ridges Morphology
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 19, EGU2017-4010-1, 2017 EGU General Assembly 2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Reading Ombrone river delta evolution through beach ridges morphology Irene Mammi, Marco Piccardi, Enzo Pranzini, and Lorenzo Rossi Department of Earth Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy The present study focuses on the evolution of the Ombrone River delta (Southern Tuscany, Italy) in the last five centuries, when fluvial sediment input was huge also as a consequence of the deforestation performed on the watershed. The aim of this study is to find a correlation between river input and beach ridges morphology and to explain the different distribution of wetlands and sand deposits on the two sides of the delta. Visible, NIR and TIR satellite images were processed to retrieve soil wetness associated to sand ridges and interdune silty deposits. High resolution LiDAR data were analysed using vegetation filter and GIS enhancement algorithms in order to highlight small morphological variations, especially in areas closer to the river where agriculture has almost deleted these morphologies. A topographic survey and a very high resolution 3D model obtained from a set of images acquired by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) were carried out in selected sites, both to calibrate satellite LiDAR 3D data, and to map low relief areas. Historical maps, aerial photography and written documents were analysed for dating ancient shorelines associated to specific beach ridges. Thus allowing the reconstruction of erosive and accretive phases of the delta. Seventy beach ridges were identified on the two wings of the delta. On the longer down-drift side (Northern wing) beach ridges are more spaced at the apex and gradually converge to the extremity, where the Bruna River runs and delimits the sub aerial depositional area of the Ombrone River.
    [Show full text]
  • Albany Beach Shoreline Stabilization and Beach/Dune Nourishment
    ALBANY BEACH SHORELINE STABILIZATION AND BEACH/DUNE NOURISHMENT Scott Fenical, Mott MacDonald, LLC, [email protected] Chris Barton, East Bay Regional Park District, [email protected] Jeff Peters, Questa Engineering, Inc, [email protected] Frank Salcedo, Mott MacDonald, LLC, [email protected] Keith Merkel, Merkel & Associates, Inc, [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION XBEACH was also used to estimate potential future The Albany Beach Restoration Project was initiated with adjustments under similar conditions as well as conditions the goal of stopping landfill erosion into San Francisco under sea level rise in the future, and the performance of Bay, while creating aquatic habitat, and nourishing a different imported beach sand alternatives. All three pocket beach at McLaughlin Eastshore State Park, sources were determined to be reasonably compatible, Albany, California. The site contains an existing sandy with the coarsest imported sand alternative being pocket beach which is unique to San Francisco Bay, and recommended in order to maximize re-nourishment was formed by construction of the Albany Neck and Bulb, intervals. Aeolian transport was also evaluated to which was created as a landfill. Coastal engineering determine the relative mobility of imported sand materials analysis, numerical modeling of coastal processes, and in order to minimize nuisance transport onto the public pocket beach morphology modeling were performed to access trail immediately upland of the enhanced beach evaluate and protect against erosion on the Albany Neck and dunes. and prevent contaminant entry to the Bay, evaluate potential enhancement alternatives for the sandy pocket Results of the modeling and analysis were used to beach, and develop design criteria for living shorelines prescribe appropriate types, locations/elevations, and structures/habitat elements.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Historical Shoreline Changes on Beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui, Hawaii Bradley M
    Journal of Coastal Research 00 0 000–000 West Palm Beach, Florida Month 0000 A Summary of Historical Shoreline Changes on Beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui, Hawaii Bradley M. Romine and Charles H. Fletcher* Department of Geology and Geophysics www.cerf-jcr.org School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology University of Hawaii at Manoa POST Building, Suite 701, 1680 East–West Road Honolulu, HI 96822, USA [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT ROMINE, B.M. and FLETCHER, C.H., 2012. A summary of historical shoreline changes on beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui; Hawaii. Journal of Coastal Research, 00(0), 000–000. West Palm Beach (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Shoreline change was measured along the beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui (Hawaii) using historical shorelines digitized from aerial photographs and survey charts for the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Assessment of Shoreline Change. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive report on shoreline change throughout Hawaii and supplements the limited data on beach changes in carbonate reef–dominated systems. Trends in long-term (early 1900s– present) and short-term (mid-1940s–present) shoreline change were calculated at regular intervals (20 m) along the shore using weighted linear regression. Erosion dominated the shoreline change in Hawaii, with 70% of beaches being erosional (long-term), including 9% (21 km) that was completely lost to erosion (e.g., seawalls), and an average shoreline change rate of 20.11 6 0.01 m/y. Short-term results were somewhat less erosional (63% erosional, average change rate of 20.06 6 0.01 m/y).
    [Show full text]
  • Capt. Alek Modjeski
    AMERICAN LITTORAL SOCIETY SANDY HOOK, HIGHLANDS, NJ 07732 Capt. Alek Modjeski On and Over Water Health and Safety Trainer American Littoral Society Habitat Restoration Program Director, Certified Affiliations Professional Ecologist (2012) Member Restore America’s Estuaries Shorelines Certified Restoration Practitioner (Application Tech Transfer Workshop Steering Committee submitted 2020) 2021 Recipient of 2014 EPA Region 2 Environmental Co-Chair – NJ Ecological Restoration and Quality Award, 2014 Monmouth County Science Advisory Group Planning Board Merit Award, ASBPA 2018/2020 Member New Jersey Coastal Resilience Best Restored Shoreline in US, 2018 Blue Peter Collaborative Award, and 2015/2018 New Jersey’s Governor’s Member NJ Coastal Ecological Project Environmental Excellence Award Committee – Chair of Implementation Sub- Committee Work History Member NJ Coastal Resilience Collaborative – American Littoral Society – Habitat Restoration Co-Chair Subcommittee Ecological Restoration Program Director – 1/2014 to Present and Science AECOM –Water Natural Resources Director and Member of NJ FRAMES Constituency Advisory Senior Marine Ecologist/Project Manager - Group Two Rivers Steering Committee – Chair 1/2002-1/2014 of Ecology and Habitat Committee Louis Berger Group – Ecologist - 5/1998 - Member of RAE National Restoration Toolkit 1/2002 Steering Committee - Northeast Region Liaison NJDEP – Biologist - 4/1994 - 5/1998 Member RAE National Living Shorelines Education Community of Practice Group MS in Environmental Planning and Policy, Member
    [Show full text]