DOCSLIB.ORG

Hazard Identification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hazard Identification Wyoming Region 6 Park County Washakie County Hot Springs County Big Horn County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT August 2016 Developed by Washakie, Hot Springs, Park and Big Horn Counties DRAFT With professional planning assistance from Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. Hazard Mitigation and Emergency Management Program Table of Contents Chapters Chapter 1 – Introduction ...........................................................................................................1.1 1.1 Purpose ..............................................................................................................................1.1 1.2 Background and Scope .....................................................................................................1.1 1.3 Plan Organization..............................................................................................................1.2 1.4 Multi-Jurisdtional Planning ..............................................................................................1.3 Chapter 2 – Community Profile ................................................................................................2.1 2.1 Geography and Climate ....................................................................................................2.1 2.2 Population .........................................................................................................................2.3 2.3 Economy ...........................................................................................................................2.3 Chapter 3 – Planning Process ....................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Background on Mitigation Planning in the Region ..........................................................3.1 3.2 Local Government Participation .......................................................................................3.3 3.3 The 10-Step Planning Process ..........................................................................................3.3 3.3.1 Phase 1: Organize Resources ...................................................................................3.5 3.3.2 Phase 2: Assess Risks ............................................................................................3.15 3.3.3 Phase 3: Develop the Mitigation Plan ....................................................................3.15 3.3.4 Phase 4: Implement the Plan and Monitor Progress ..............................................3.16 Chapter 4 –Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment .................................................................4.1 4.1 Hazard Identification ................................DRAFT........................................................................4.2 4.1.1. Results and Methodology .......................................................................................4.2 4.1.2 Disaster Declaration History ....................................................................................4.4 4.2 Hazard Profiles..................................................................................................................4.7 4.2.1 Profile Methodology ................................................................................................4.7 4.2.2 Avalanche ................................................................................................................4.9 4.2.3 Dam Failure ...........................................................................................................4.15 4.2.4 Drought ..................................................................................................................4.23 4.2.5 Earthquake .............................................................................................................4.43 4.2.6 Expansive Soils ......................................................................................................4.63 4.2.7 Extreme Cold .........................................................................................................4.69 4.2.8 Flood ......................................................................................................................4.74 4.2.9 Hailstorm................................................................................................................4.90 4.2.10 Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................4.95 Region 6 DRAFT i Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 4.2.11 High Winds and Downbursts .............................................................................4.100 4.2.12 Landslide/Rockfall/Debris Flow ........................................................................4.106 4.2.13 Lightning ............................................................................................................4.116 4.2.14 Mine Subsidence ................................................................................................4.121 4.2.15 Tornado ..............................................................................................................4.125 4.2.16 Severe Winter Weather ......................................................................................4.135 4.2.17 Wildfire ..............................................................................................................4.140 Chapter 5 – Mitigation Strategy ................................................................................................5.1 5.1 Mitigation Strategy: Overview .........................................................................................5.1 5.2 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................5.1 5.3 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions............................................................5.4 5.3.1 Prioritization Process ...............................................................................................5.5 5.4 Mitigation Action Plan ......................................................................................................5.7 5.4.1 Progress on Previous Mitigation Actions ................................................................5.7 5.4.2 Continued Compliance with NFIP ...........................................................................5.7 5.4.3 Mitigation Action Plan .............................................................................................5.8 Chapter 6 – Plan Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance............................................6.1 6.1 Formal Plan Adoption .......................................................................................................6.1 6.2 Implementation .................................................................................................................6.1 6.2.1 Role of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee in Implementation and Maintenance .............................................................................................................6.2 6.3 Maintenance ......................................................................................................................6.3 6.3.1 Maintenance Schedule .............................................................................................6.3 6.3.2 Maintenance Evaluation Process .............................................................................6.3 6.3.3 Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms ..................................................6.4 6.3.4 Continued Public InvolvementDRAFT ................................................................................6.5 Region 6 DRAFT ii Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 2016 County Planning Annexes Washakie County Planning Annex Hot Springs County Planning Annex Park County Planning Annex Big Horn County Planning Annex - 2015 Hazard Mitigation Plan Appendixes Appendix A – County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Members Appendix B – Region 6 Landslide Attachment Appendix C - Planning Process Documentation Appendix D – Washakie County Flood Chapter Update 2013 Appendix E – Records of Adoption (electronic) Appendix F – Critical Facility Details (electronic) DRAFT Region 6 DRAFT iii Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This plan is the product of a 2016 planning process undertaken by the four counties in the Big Horn Basin in Wyoming Office of Homeland Security Region 6 – Big Horn, Park, Hot Springs and Washakie. The purpose is to meet the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (PL 106-390), and thereby maintain continued eligibility for certain Hazard Mitigation – or disaster loss reduction – programs from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This plan updates existing hazard mitigation plans for Washakie and Park counties, and serves as a new hazard mitigation plan for Hot Springs County. Big Horn County had updated its hazard mitigation plan in late 2015 and adopted it in 2016, thus it is included in its entirety as an annex to this plan. The process followed a methodology that adheres to FEMA guidance. It consisted of two levels of planning teams; a coordinating planning team comprised of the County Emergency Management Coordinators, and four local government teams – one in each county. Every municipality within each county was invited to participate. The planning process examined the recorded history of losses resulting from natural hazards, and analyzed the future risks posed to each county by these
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seismicity, Seismotectonics and Preliminary Earthquake Hazard Analysis of the Teton Region, WY
    FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT DEVELOPMENT OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND SHAKING HAZARD MAPS FOR THE YELLOWSTONE- JACKSON HOLE-STAR VALLEY, WYOMING Submitted to the U.S. Geological Survey Under the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Program Element II Evaluate Urban Hazard and Risk USGS Award 05HQGR0026 Prepared by Bonnie Jean Pickering White Department of Geology and Geophysics The University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 94112 and Robert B. Smith Department of Geology and Geophysics The University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 94112 Principal Investigator Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group URS Corporation 1333 Broadway, Suite 800, Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 874-3014, Fax: (510) 874-3268 E-mail: [email protected] 26 September 2006 __________________________ This research was supported by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS Award Number 05HQGR0026. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied of the U.S. Government. PREFACE The Yellowstone-Jackson Hole-Star Valley corridor is located within the seismically and tectonically active Intermountain Seismic Belt in westernmost Wyoming and eastern Idaho. The corridor has the highest seismic hazard in the Intermountain U.S. based on the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Hazard Maps. The region contains the heavily visited Yellowstone and Teton National Parks and the rapidly growing areas of Jackson Hole and Star Valley. Although there has only been one large earthquake in this region in historical times (1959 moment magnitude [M] 7.5 Hebgen Lake), abundant geologic evidence exists for the past occurrence of surface-faulting earthquakes of M 7 or greater.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 20 Great American Rail-Trail Statistics in Wyoming
    Wyoming ROUTE Wyoming has the potential to be an incredible section of the Great American Rail-Trail. Its landscapes are unique in the United States, and Wyoming is already known for its outdoor recreation assets. Because of Wyoming’s topography, any route through Wyoming will require sizable grade increases at several locations. Local options including shuttle services could be explored to accommodate trail users who are unable to traverse these grade increases. Currently, there are not significant miles of multiuse trail that could be used to route a trail across Wyoming. However, with the statewide commitment to the project and the exceptional landscapes across the state, the Great American Rail-Trail is a viable project to help Wyoming with its outdoor recreation and tourism economy. RTC found and reviewed 20 plans in Wyoming to better understand the state’s trail priorities. A full list of these plans can be found in Appendix A. Casper Rail-Trail in Wyoming | Photo by Kevin Belanger, courtesy Rails-to-Trails Conservancy TABLE 20 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL STATISTICS IN WYOMING Total Great American Rail-Trail Existing Trail Miles in Wyo. (% of Total State Mileage) 13.1 (2.6%) Total Great American Rail-Trail Trail Gap Miles in Wyo. (% of Total State Mileage) 496.4 (97.4%) Total Trail Gaps in Wyo. 6 Total Great American Rail-Trail Miles in Wyo. 509.5 88 greatamericanrailtrail.org GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE ASSESSMENT WYOMING TABLE 21 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE THROUGH WYOMING Existing Trail or Trail Gap Name Length in Wyo. Along Great American Rail-Trail (in Miles) TRAIL GAP 62a – Neb.–Wyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming SCORP Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014 - 2019 Wyoming Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2014-2019
    Wyoming SCORP Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014 - 2019 Wyoming Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2014-2019 The 2014-2019 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan was prepared by the Planning and Grants Section within Wyoming’s Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources, Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails. Updates to the trails chapter were completed by the Trails Section within the Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails. The Wyoming Game and Fish Department provided the wetlands chapter. The preparation of this plan was financed through a planning grant from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, under the provision of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578, as amended). For additional information contact: Wyoming Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails 2301 Central Avenue, Barrett Building Cheyenne, WY 82002 (307) 777-6323 Wyoming SCORP document available online at www.wyoparks.state.wy.us. Table of Contents Chapter 1 • Introduction ................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 2 • Description of State ............................................................................. 11 Chapter 3 • Recreation Facilities and Needs .................................................... 29 Chapter 4 • Trails ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter of the CMC Pikes Peak Group
    August 2017 | No. 237 The Newsletter of the CMC Pikes Peak Group Member Contributions BARR CAMP RENOVATION COMPLETED LA PLATA TRIP, JUNE 24 By Dean Waits By David Kuenzli L-R: Dan Hildebrand, Andrea Torske, William Musser, Robin Mino, Brad Sherman, Krista Scott, and Barbara Newsome. Trip leader David Kuenzli behind the camera. If you’ve recently hiked to Barr Camp you would have noticed a lot of new construction activity. A new foundation was GOOSE CREEK TRAIL – SHAFT HOUSE TRIP, JULY 1 installed under the log cabin structure Fred Barr completed in By Carol Schmitz 1924, along with a new composite porch and some new bridges that now allow the caretakers to safely retrieve supplies from the Mountain View storage. The project has now been completed. Your Pikes Peak Group helped preserve and renovate this historical icon by making a $1,000 donation. If you haven’t made a trip to either spend the night or just for the exercise, it’s a wonderful six-mile adventure. L-R: Gary Marx, Barb Gutow, Jo Anne Peterson, Erika Lefstad (Denver group), Sherry Scott, Carol Schmitz (leader), Susan Gerdes, Bryan Scott. 1 Welcome New PPG Members! Your PPG Council Jonathan Huang Matthew Triplett Taylor Lindsey Samuel Woods Chair – Collin Powers Jo Anne Peterson 719-963-0653, [email protected] Past Chair – Rick Keetch 719-634-1165, [email protected] Summer 2017 Stewardship Schedule ARCPro Co-Directors – Collin Powers 719-685-2470, [email protected]; Scott Kime, 719-235-0939, This summer the CMC has four stewardship projects scheduled in [email protected] coordination with the Pike National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • WYOMING Adventure Guide from YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK to WILD WEST EXPERIENCES
    WYOMING adventure guide FROM YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK TO WILD WEST EXPERIENCES TravelWyoming.com/uk • VisitTheUsa.co.uk/state/wyoming • +1 307-777-7777 WIND RIVER COUNTRY South of Yellowstone National Park is Wind River Country, famous for rodeos, cowboys, dude ranches, social powwows and home to the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Indian tribes. You’ll find room to breathe in this playground to hike, rock climb, fish, mountain bike and see wildlife. Explore two mountain ranges and scenic byways. WindRiver.org CARBON COUNTY Go snowmobiling and cross-country skiing or explore scenic drives through mountains and prairies, keeping an eye out for foxes, coyotes, antelope and bald eagles. In Rawlins, take a guided tour of the Wyoming Frontier Prison and Museum, a popular Old West attraction. In the quiet town of Saratoga, soak in famous mineral hot springs. WyomingCarbonCounty.com CODY/YELLOWSTONE COUNTRY Visit the home of Buffalo Bill, an American icon, at the eastern gateway to Yellowstone National Park. See wildlife including bears, wolves and bison. Discover the Wild West at rodeos and gunfight reenactments. Hike through the stunning Absaroka Mountains, ride a mountain bike on the “Twisted Sister” trail and go flyfishing in the Shoshone River. YellowstoneCountry.org THE WORT HOTEL A landmark on the National Register of Historic Places, The Wort Hotel represents the Western heritage of Jackson Hole and its downtown location makes it an easy walk to shops, galleries and restaurants. Awarded Forbes Travel Guide Four-Star Award and Condé Nast Readers’ Choice Award. WortHotel.com welcome to Wyoming Lovell YELLOWSTONE Powell Sheridan BLACK TO YELLOW REGION REGION Cody Greybull Bu alo Gillette 90 90 Worland Newcastle 25 Travel Tips Thermopolis Jackson PARK TO PARK GETTING TO KNOW WYOMING REGION The rugged Rocky Mountains meet the vast Riverton Glenrock Lander High Plains (high-elevation prairie) in Casper Douglas SALT TO STONE Wyoming, which encompasses 253,348 REGION ROCKIES TO TETONS square kilometres in the western United 25 REGION States.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Variation of Late Pleistocene Fault Scarp Height in the Teton Range, Wyoming, USA: Variable Fault Slip Rates Or Variable GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: Cenozoic Tectonics, Magmatism, and Stratigraphy of the Snake River Plain–Yellowstone Region and Adjacent Areas GEOSPHERE Systematic variation of Late Pleistocene fault scarp height in the Teton Range, Wyoming, USA: Variable fault slip rates or variable GEOSPHERE; v. 13, no. 2 landform ages? doi:10.1130/GES01320.1 Glenn D. Thackray and Amie E. Staley* 8 figures; 1 supplemental file Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, 921 South 8th Avenue, Pocatello, Idaho 83209, USA CORRESPONDENCE: thacglen@ isu .edu ABSTRACT ously and repeatedly to climate shifts in multiple valleys, they create multi­ CITATION: Thackray, G.D., and Staley, A.E., 2017, ple isochronous markers for evaluation of spatial and temporal variation of Systematic variation of Late Pleistocene fault scarp height in the Teton Range, Wyoming, USA: Variable Fault scarps of strongly varying height cut glacial and alluvial sequences fault motion (Gillespie and Molnar, 1995; McCalpin, 1996; Howle et al., 2012; fault slip rates or variable landform ages?: Geosphere, mantling the faulted front of the Teton Range (western USA). Scarp heights Thackray et al., 2013). v. 13, no. 2, p. 287–300, doi:10.1130/GES01320.1. vary from 11.2 to 37.6 m and are systematically higher on geomorphically older In some cases, faults of known slip rate can also be used to evaluate ages landforms. Fault scarps cutting a deglacial surface, known from cosmogenic of glacial and alluvial sequences. However, this process is hampered by spatial Received 26 January 2016 Revision received 22 November 2016 radionuclide exposure dating to immediately postdate 14.7 ± 1.1 ka, average and temporal variability of offset along individual faults and fault segments Accepted 13 January 2017 12.0 m in height, and yield an average postglacial offset rate of 0.82 ± 0.13 (e.g., Z.
    [Show full text]
  • A 20-Day Inspirational Itinerary
    StateA 20-day inspirational Parks itinerary N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ® MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA WYOMING SOUTH DAKOTA IDAHO COLORADO ITINERARY OVERVIEW TOTAL TRIP*: 4,336 MILES/6,978 KM | 78 HOURS DRIVING ARRIVAL GATEWAY: Denver (DEN) DAY 1: Wyoming (Curt Gowdy) DAY 2: Wyoming (Bear River) DAY 3: Idaho (Bear Lake) DAY 4: Idaho (City of Rocks | Castle Rocks) DAY 5: Idaho (Thousand Springs | Bruneau Dunes) DAY 6: Idaho (Harriman) DAY 7: Montana (Bannack) DAY 8: Montana (Lewis & Clark Caverns | Missouri Headwaters | Madison Buffalo Jump) DAY 9: Montana (Chief Plenty Coups | Pictograph Cave) DAY 10: Montana (Makoshika) DAY 11: North Dakota (Little Missouri State Park) DAY 12: North Dakota (Fort Abraham Lincoln) DAY 13: North Dakota (Lake Sakakawea | Fort Stevenson) DAY 14: North Dakota (Fort Ransom) DAY 15: South Dakota (Palisades) DAY 16: South Dakota (Lewis & Clark Recreation Area) DAY 17: South Dakota (Custer State Park) DAY 18: South Dakota (Custer State Park) DAY 19: Wyoming (Hot Springs State Park) DAY 20: Wyoming (Guernsey State Park | Quebec 01 Missile Alert Facility) DEPARTURE GATEWAY: Denver (DEN) *Drive times and distances are approximate and meant for inspiration only DAY 1: WYOMING CURT GOWDY STATE PARK ACTIVITIES: Recently named as an “Epic” trail system by the International Mountain Bicycling Association, the foothills of the Laramie Mountains offer a stunning setting for any kind of outdoor enthusiast. Separating Cheyenne and Laramie, Curt Gowdy State Park was named for the native Wyomingite and noted sportscaster. The area features granite towers, rocky soils and timbered slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho Contact Information For more information about the Yellowstone National Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or 307-344-7381 or write to: Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park, PO Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190-0168 Park Description Yellowstone became the world’s first national park on March This vast landscape contains the headwaters of several major 1, 1872, set aside in recognition of its unique hydrothermal rivers. The Firehole and Gibbon rivers unite to form the Madison, features and for the benefit and enjoyment of the people. which, along with the Gallatin River, joins the Jefferson to With this landmark decision, the United States Congress create the Missouri River several miles north of the park. The created a path for future parks within this country and Yellowstone River is a major tributary of the Missouri, which around the world; Yellowstone still serves as a global then flows via the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico. The Snake resource conservation and tourism model for public land River arises near the park’s south boundary and joins the management. Yellowstone is perhaps most well-known for its Columbia to flow into the Pacific. Yellowstone Lake is the largest hydrothermal features such as the iconic Old Faithful geyser. lake at high altitude in North America and the Lower Yellowstone The park encompasses 2.25 million acres, or 3,472 square Falls is the highest of more than 40 named waterfalls in the park. miles, of a landscape punctuated by steaming pools, bubbling mudpots, spewing geysers, and colorful volcanic soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Lander Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement Lander Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement
    United States Department of the interior Bureau of Land Management Rawlins District Office March 1990 Lander Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement Lander Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Impact Statement Type of Action: ( ) Administrative (X) Legislative Responsible Agencies: Lead Agency: Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Cooperating Agencies: None Abstract The Lander Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement analyzes six wilderness study areas (WSAs) in the Rawlins District to determine the re­ source impacts that could result from designation or nondesignation of those WSAs as wilderness. The following WSAs are recommended as nonsuitable for wilderness designation: Lankin Dome, WSA 030-120 (6,316 acres), Split Rock, 030-122 (12,749 acres), Savage Peak, 030-123a (7,041 acres), Miller Springs, 030-123b (6,429 acres), and Copper Mountain, 030-111 (6,858 acres). For the Sweetwater Canyon WSA, 030-101 (9,056 acres), 3,518 acres are rec­ ommended as nonsuitable for wilderness designation; the remaining portion (5,538 acres) is recommended for wilderness designation. Comments have been requested and received from the following: See the “Consultation" section. Date draft statement made available to the Environmental Protection Agency and the public. Draft EIS: Filed 11/7/85 Final EIS: United States Department of the interior JSraSTAKE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WYOMING STATE OFFICE P.O. BOX 1828 CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82003 Dear Reader: Enclosed is the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for six Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs) in the Lander Resource Area of our Rawlins District. The WSAs include; Sweetwater Canyon, Lankin Dome, Split Rock, Miller Springs, Savage Peak, and Copper Mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL COPYRIGHTED I
    Avalanche Campground (MT), 66 Big Horn Equestrian Center (WY), Index Avenue of the Sculptures (Billings, 368 MT), 236 Bighorn Mountain Loop (WY), 345 Bighorn Mountains Trail System INDEX A (WY), 368–369 AARP, 421 B Bighorn National Forest (WY), 367 Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness Backcountry camping, Glacier Big Red (Clearmont, WY), 370 (MT), 225–227 National Park (MT), 68 Big Red Gallery (Clearmont, WY), Academic trips, 44–45 Backcountry permits 370 Accommodations, 413–414 Glacier National Park (MT), Big Salmon Lake (MT), 113 best, 8–10 54–56 Big Sheep Creek Canyon (MT), 160 for families with children, 416 Grand Teton (WY), 325 Big Sky (MT), 8, 215–220 Active vacations, 43–52 Yellowstone National Park Big Sky Brewing Company AdventureBus, 45, 269 (MT—WY), 264 (Missoula, MT), 93 Adventure Sports (WY), 309, 334 Backcountry Reservations, 56 Big Sky Candy (Hamilton, MT), 96 Adventure trips, 45–46 Backcountry skiing, 48 Big Sky Golf Course (MT), 217 AdventureWomen, 201–202 Backroads, 45, 46 Big Sky Resort (MT), 216–217 Aerial Fire Depot and Baggs (WY), 390 Big Sky Waterpark (MT), 131 Smokejumper Center (Missoula, Ballooning, Teton Valley (WY), Big Spring (MT), 188 MT), 86–87 306 Big Spring Creek (MT), 187 Air tours Bannack (MT), 167, 171–172 Big Timber Canyon Trail (MT), 222 Glacier National Park (MT), 59 Bannack Days (MT), 172 Biking and mountain biking, 48 the Tetons (WY), 306 Barry’s Landing (WY), 243 Montana Air travel, 409, 410 Bay Books & Prints (Bigfork, MT), Big Sky, 216 Albright Visitor Center 105 Bozeman, 202 (Yellowstone), 263, 275
    [Show full text]
  • High Country News Vol. 2.29, Aug. 14, 1970
    Th~ ,;~tdoor,OIJdr EnvironmentalBi - W,•• kl, Vol. %. No. 29 Ftiday, August 14. 1970 'Antelope Under Gun; One -ShotSchedul ed .This year's hunting season 'an outgrowth of the old North in Wyoming will start off with Rawlins-Table Rock area. a bang' on Sept. 5. The state's The season will close in these most popular game animal, areas (57 & 29) on Sept. 13, the pronghorn antelope, will 1970.This year, 950 resident come under fire for the first and non-resident antelope time this year in the Chain permits were made 'available Lakes and Table Rock areas. in these areas. 'These areas appear on the Bill Crump, 'district hunting orders' as' areas 57 supervisor of the Wyoming, and 29 respectively and are Game and Fish Commission, reported tha t the Chain Lakes and Table Rock areas are the best trophy hunting areas in the state. Crump also said Ski Meet Is that the broad, open desert country in this area was very popular for campers. He 'also At Casper noted that many hunters will be going out prior to opening The' Wyoming Open I'n- day with camping vehicles to vitational Water Ski Meet make "a .week of it" by will be hosted by the Casper combining camping and rock Water Ski Club this year. The hunting with their antelope meet will be held Sunday, hunt. SeptemberS, beginning at 8 Along wtth . the annual a m, a t the casper Clu b opening of hunting season quarters at Alcova Lake. comes the One Shot Antelope Registra tion will begin Hunt held here in Lander , Sa turday, Sept.
    [Show full text]