DOCSLIB.ORG

Trade Unions A. Lozovsky

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trade Unions A. Lozovsky MARX AND THE TRADE UNIONS By A. LOZOVSKY % l INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS NEW YORK * o MARX AND THE TRADE UNIONS * * MARX and the TRADE UNIONS hy A. LOZOVSKY NEW TORK INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS 381 FOURTH AVENUE First published 1935 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY THE STANHOrE PRESS LTD. ROCHESTER ; KENT CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Preface .............................................................. 7 Introduction..................................................... 9 I. Role of the Trade Unions in the General Class Struggle of the Proletariat .... J5 II. Marx against Proudhonism and Bakuninism 26 III. The Struggle against Lasalleanism and all other forms of German Opportunism 37 IV. Marx and the Trade Union Movement in England - 49 V. Marx and the Labour Movement in France 63 VI. Marx and the United States .... 88 VII. Marx and the Struggle for the Partial Demands of the Working Class................................... 106 VIII. Marx and the Strike Movement .... 120 IX. Pseudo-Marxists and the Trade Union Critics of Marx ..................................................... 138 X. Marx, the Organiser of the Working Class . 159 XI. For Marxism-Leninism in the Trade Union Movement..................................................... 174 Index ........................................................ 187 5 n PREFACE This book goes beyond the scope of its title. First of all, because it gives not only the position of Marx on the trade unions, but also that of Engels, who is second to Marx as creator of the theory, strategy and tactics of revolutionary Marxism. Second, the tasks of the trade unions can be correctly defined only on the basis of the general class tasks of the proletariat— this leads to going beyond the framework of narrow trade union problems and to studying the political line of Marx and Engels concerning the problems of the labour movement. Third, history is the most political and most partisan science of all sciences. To study the past without relation to the present is possible only for persons who either have no sense of party or political responsibility whatever, or whose sense of this respon­ sibility has become completely atrophied. There are people who believe that to be a historian or a keeper of archives is almost one and the same thing, the only difference being that the keeper of archives collects documents of the past, while the historian comments on these documents, without leaving the framework of this past. This is wrong. The historian utilises documents concerning the past, but if he fails to see things beyond the walls of his archives, if he does not leave the palisade of the past, if he fails to glance over the fence hedging off old historical dates, he considerably lessens the value of his work. The past must help our struggle to-day. Otherwise it is not worth while spending time studying it. The positive and negative experiences acquired in the past must arm us for the struggle for a better future. The task is not only to study the world, but to transform it. This is what the author had in mind when he sat down to shed light on the trade union heritage of Marx and Engels. After having thoroughly analysed the views of Marx and Engels in the field of the trade union movement and economic struggle, I 7 8 MARX AND THE TRADE UNIONS realised clearly that we were late, that we should not have waited for the 50th anniversary of the death of Marx, but should long ago have collected all the views of Marx and Engels on the trade union movement and the economic struggle of the working class. Indeed, we are late. However, better late than never. Marx and Engels are modern; they are modern not only in what they themselves wrote, but in what their successors, their best pupils, have been doing since their departure from the battlefield. This means that we must study carefully what Lenin and Stalin contributed to the problem of immediate interest to us. That is why the author considers this book to be only a beginning. The second part will be Lenin and the Trade Unions, the third part, Stalin and the Trade Unions, while all three parts together will consti­ tute Revolutionary Marxism and the Trade Union Movement. This work must include not only the pre-war experience of the socialist and trade union internationals, but also the experience of the Marxian experience of the Communist International and the Red International of Labour Unions. It was time, high time, that this work was started. I hope that our strong historians will be drawn into the task and that all will jointly succeed in working out the theory, strategy and tactics of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin in the trade union movement. If this book will serve as an impetus, as a starting-point in furthering this great and complicated task of making a Marxian analysis of the theoretical and tactical principles of the inter­ national revolutionary trade union movement, its publication will have been justified. A. L. Moscow, March 14, 1933. INTRODUCTION As the physical image of Karl Marx fades more and more into the past, the spiritual figure of this giant of thought and revolutionary action comes more and more vividly to the fore. Marx represents a whole world of ideas and images; he is unsurpassed as a theo­ retician, statesman, strategist and tactician of the class struggle. His brain was like a tremendous laboratory, which analytically and synthetically worked over facts and events, beginning with revolutions, wars, colonial revolts, pronunciamentos, peasant rebellions and parliamentary debates, and ending with strikes, demonstrations and even the smallest spontaneous economic and political actions. Marx was not merely a person of encyclopaedic education, he was an independent dialectic thinker. He was not a scientist in the narrow, professorial sense of the word. He was an innovator, bold to the extreme, who fearlessly carried his thoughts to their logical conclusion. He was one of those thinkers (and there have been very few of them in the history of mankind) who with the minds of great geniuses looked into the future, and with the daring hands of revolutionaries and artists (“my work represents one artistic whole,” he wrote to Engels in 1865) pointed out the path of development from capitalism to communism. Marx did not guess nor did he prophesy. He argued, analysed, dissected facts, exposed their inner connections and placed them in such a way that they themselves compelled definite conclusions. He placed Hegelian dialectics on its feet, he was never lost in the face of facts; always remaining firm, he knew exactly what he wanted in theory, in politics and in tactics. Marx devoured an enormous number of books, deeply ana­ lysed facts and moulded them with his masterful mind, which to the very last days of his life continued to pour forth ever-new treasures for the international proletariat. 9 10 MARX AND THE TRADE UNIONS Marx was not a dry bookworm; he seethed with the great passion and ardour of a fighter. He disliked unnecessary words, glib but empty phrases, and fought against those who roamed in the “misty realm of philosophical phantasy” (Communist Mani­ festo, p. 32). Every phrase written by Marx, every one of his words lives to-day—so much life and passion is there in the works of this great scientist, the tireless destroyer of all pseudo-scientific authorities, the exposer of petty-bourgeois babblers, the merciless enemy of all pseudo-socialist schools, sects and groupings. Marx did not like words devoid of content, phrases without deeds; physically he could not tolerate phrasemongers of socialism. His mind penetrated to the very essence of a question. He knew how to extract the main issues, the very essence from the tens of thousands of pages that he had read and from the hundreds of thousands of facts he had stored up; he was able to say much in few words. Marx possessed the special ability of clothing his rich thought in scant but vivid language. This is why even to-day when one immerses oneself in the works of Marx one is bound to feel deeply moved. It is not only his major works that have retained their importance up to the present time; even his separate articles on vital questions, his notes and letters going far back to the nine­ teenth century, throw light on the path of the development of the labour movement in the twentieth century. The more one peruses the rich inheritance of Marx, the more vital it becomes, the more pronounced become the features of this great theoretician and organiser of the working class, the nearer and more comprehen­ sible does he grow—he who gave his life for the purpose of con­ verting the working class “from a class for others into a class for itself.” Marx is multiform, but uniform and consistent in all that he said and did. Not in vain did he succinctly describe the dis­ tinguishing feature of his character as singleness of purpose. Only conditionally is it possible to separate some one question or group of questions from the whole of Marx’s work. However, it must be borne in mind at the outset that the inheritance that Marx left is the richest that any person ever left to his descendants, that it is monolithic and it is difficult to divide into separate parts. It is especially difficult to separate from the depository of ideas MARX AND THE TRADE UNIONS II and thoughts that Marx left that part which deals with the trade union movement and the economic struggle. Marx did not write any special books or pamphlet or textbook on this subject. His ideas on problems of the economic struggle and the role of the trade unions in the past, present and future can be found all through his works, especially in his practical work as leader of the International Workingmen’s Association.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trade Unions at Work
    Publications and further information The TUC publishes a wide range of reports, leaflets, books and DVDs. We also produce a downloadable educational resource pack for schools and youth organisations, A Better Way to Work, to help young people prepare for the world of work. We have an extensive website at www.tuc.org.uk. This contains press statements, campaign news, policy briefings, statistical information and publications for sale. Register online for free email news updates matching your areas of interest. Reprint of revised edition May 2010 4K Design: Eureka! Print: College Hill Press ISBN 978 1 85006 862 4 Contact details: Trades Union Congress Congress House Great Russell Street London WC1B 3LS Tel: 020 7636 4030 Fax: 020 7636 0632 www.tuc.org.uk If you do not belong to a union and want to know which Trade unions one to join, phone the TUC ‘Join a Union’ line on: 0870 600 4882 at work Calls are charged at the national rate. Front cover photo: For more information about the TUC’s different activities what they are and what they do try one of our websites: John Harris/reportdigital.co.uk www.tuc.org.uk (main site) www.worksmart.org.uk (help and advice for everyone at work) www.unionlearn.org.uk (for learners and learning reps) www.unionhistory.info (TUC archives online) Printed on a FSC Certified Product Including a guide to the Trades Union Congress Contents Introduction 03 Introduction: The world of work the world of work 04 Section 1: Unions today 12 Section 2: The TUC 22 Glossary Work dominates modern life.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Unions and the Capitalist State.Pdf
    ,/ ~· InzyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBAparticular, texts such as Th~rborn:s, l/7ha/ b Dou /he Rllling Clan DokjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Unfortunately there has been a tradicional failure amongst Marxists to Ir,mlll UII/U?, and Poul~tzas , S/a/e, POllJer, JOCla/IJIII, expllcltly con- :..:".r-'~~~- address the relationship between trade unionism and the state in a 't"""." rJj; cáhed tfiemselves with tracing and delineating the changing patterns , - I ~ rigorous dialectical fashion. Therborn's valuable perception, for ..,'.~.~<~ of bourgeois-democratic rule In \Ore ff1ollop·6!y==capinrtistera:! The ¡/ 1 instance, that as a collective mass organization, 'the labour movement \ \ si~f1íficantchanges were broadly seen to entail : a s_hiftin the lo¿us 0L isorganized in a fundamentally different way from the state bureaucracyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA dccision-rnakinp from parliament ro the techno:ratic/exec~tive appar- l or a capitalist firm,' was not carried over to examine the contradietions , --l:> atus of tfie state¡ the fus!on of tIle stafeat ~Ievel wHh the top that arise when trade-union represent¡1tives)oin state personnel and echelons of ca )italis..!_s~rise¡ and the gener:1Qre:úilllg...do.wn of the capitalist management in 'institutionahzed Joint bodles' .• For his <7 public-prizate boundaries hat previously characterized bourgeois part,-Poulantzas made httle attempt to clarify the slgnificance of his e de/riocracy. It glrt ese observations, taken in themselves, were by passing observation that ' "reformist" trade unions are now directly no means new, either within or withour the Marxisr problematic, their inserted in the (state) administrative structure'v! Particularly in Iight: systematic location within a Marxist theory of the state was much to be applaudcd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of the Communist Party, 1912–21
    chapter 1 The Formation of the Communist Party, 1912–21 The Bolsheviks envisioned the October Revolution as the first in a series of pro- letarian revolutions. The Communist or Third International was to be a new, revolutionary international born from the wreckage of the social-democratic Second International. They sought to forge this international with what they saw as the best elements of the international working-class movement, those that had not betrayed socialism by supporting the war. The Comintern was to be a complete and definite break with the social-democratic politics of the Second International. In the face of the support of World War I by many labour and social-democratic leaders, significant sections of the workers’ movement rallied to the Bolsheviks.1 This was most pronounced in Italy and France, but in the United States as well the first Bolshevik supporters came from the left wing of the labour movement. In much of Europe, the social-democratic leaders either openly supported the militarism and imperialism of their ‘own’ ruling classes (such as when the German Social Democratic representatives voted for war credits on 4 August 1914) or (in the case of Karl Kautsky) provided ‘left’ cover to open social-chauvinists. In the United States, which entered the war late in the day, the party leadership as a whole opposed the war. However, the American socialist movement was still infected with electoral reformism, and a signifi- cant number of influential Socialists downplayed the party’s official opposi- tion to the war. This chapter examines how the American Communist movement devel- oped out of these antecedents.
    [Show full text]
  • For All the People
    Praise for For All the People John Curl has been around the block when it comes to knowing work- ers’ cooperatives. He has been a worker owner. He has argued theory and practice, inside the firms where his labor counts for something more than token control and within the determined, but still small uni- verse where labor rents capital, using it as it sees fit and profitable. So his book, For All the People: The Hidden History of Cooperation, Cooperative Movements, and Communalism in America, reached expectant hands, and an open mind when it arrived in Asheville, NC. Am I disappointed? No, not in the least. Curl blends the three strands of his historical narrative with aplomb, he has, after all, been researching, writing, revising, and editing the text for a spell. Further, I am certain he has been responding to editors and publishers asking this or that. He may have tired, but he did not give up, much inspired, I am certain, by the determination of the women and men he brings to life. Each of his subtitles could have been a book, and has been written about by authors with as many points of ideological view as their titles. Curl sticks pretty close to the narrative line written by worker own- ers, no matter if they came to work every day with a socialist, laborist, anti-Marxist grudge or not. Often in the past, as with today’s worker owners, their firm fails, a dream to manage capital kaput. Yet today, as yesterday, the democratic ideals of hundreds of worker owners support vibrantly profitable businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Kreisverwaltung Neuwied, Spurensuche. Johanna Loewenherz
    1 Johanna Loewenherz(1857-1937) Source: Kreisverwaltung Neuwied, Spurensuche. Johanna Loewenherz: Versuch einer Biografie; Copyright: Johanna- Loewenherz-Stiftung 2 Prostitution or Production, Property or Marriage? A Study on the Women´s Movement by Johanna Loewenherz Neuwied. Published by the author, 1895. [Öffentl. Bibliothek zu Wiesbaden, Sig. Hg. 5606] Translated by Isabel Busch M. A., Bonn, 2018 Translator´s Note: Johanna Loewenherz employs a complicated style of writing. The translator of this work tried to stay true to Loewenherz´ style as much as possible. Wherever it was convenient, an attempt was made to make her sentences easier to understand. However, sometimes the translator couldn´t make out Loewenherz´ sense even in the original German text, for instance because of mistakes made by Loewenherz herself. Loewenherz herself is not always consistent in her text; for example when using both the singular and plural forms of a noun or pronoun in the same sentence. The translator of this work further took the liberty of using the singular and plural forms of “man” and “woman” rather randomly, whenever Loewenherz makes generalising remarks on both sexes. Seeing that Loewenherz uses a lot of puns in the original text, the translator of this work explains these in the footnotes. It is to be noted that whenever Loewenherz quotes a person or from another text, the translator of this work either uses already existing translations (e.g. from Goethe´s Faust) or translated them herself. In the former case the sources of these quotes are named in footnotes. The other translations are not specifically marked. 3 A Visit to the Night Caféi What is it that drives a man to the harlot?—How can he bring himself to touch such a woman?— Allow me, Gentlemen, the wholehearted sincerity which convenience usually does not forgive a woman.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Privatisation and Trade Union Mobilisation: the Electricity Industry in the UK and Argentina
    Ghigliani, Pablo The Politics of privatisation and trade union mobilisation: The Electricity industry in the UK and Argentina Ghigliani, P (2010). The Politics of privatisation and trade union mobilisation : The Electricity industry in the UK and Argentina. Bern : Peter Lang. (Trade unions past, present and future ; 3). En Memoria Académica. Disponible en: http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/libros/pm.646/pm.646.pdf Información adicional en www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ To Mariana, who knows why; to Catalina and Teresa, who will; and to Tecla, who won’t. Contents List of Tables ix List of Abbreviations xi Chapter One Introduction 1 Chapter twO Developing the Analytical Framework 7 Chapter three Research Strategies and Methodologies 29 Chapter fOur Privatisation as Counter-Mobilisation 45 Chapter five The Driving-forces of Privatisation in the UK and Argentina 63 Chapter six Comparative Industrial Relations and Mobilisation Theory 75 Chapter seven The Anti-Privatisation Campaigns in the Light of Mobilisation Theory 95 viii Chapter eight List of Tables The Forms of Counter-Mobilisation: The Politics of Money 137 Chapter nine Privatisation and Collective Bargaining 169 Table 1 Detail of Case-Studies 35 Chapter ten Table 2 Distribution of Interviews among Trade Unions 37 Organisational Change, Leadership Styles and Decision-Making 207 Table 3 Main Primary Sources 39 Chapter eleven Table
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Union and the British General Strike of 1926 Alastair Kocho-Williams University of the West of England, Bristol [email protected]
    The Soviet Union and the British General Strike of 1926 Alastair Kocho-Williams University of the West of England, Bristol [email protected] This paper addresses the Soviet analysis and response to the British General Strike of 1926 in the light of newly available documents. The recently discovered and published stenograms of Politburo meetings provide new information concerning Soviet politics and the political process. Previously, scholars have had only Soviet official documents and protocols of Politburo meetings, which only detail participants with a brief summary of decisions (vypuski) along with who received these summaries.1 From the protocols, and other sources, scholars were aware that verbatim stenograms existed, some of which were published and distributed to Central Committee members and other party leaders with instructions for them to be returned after they had been read.2 Amongst the ‘lost Politburo stenograms’ is the record of a lengthy, heated, discussion of the ‘lessons of the British General Strike’ on 3 June 1926.3 It is this that the current paper is chiefly concerned with, detailing the Soviet stance towards the General Strike, inconsistency in the Soviet analysis, the extent to which Soviet internal politics was linked to foreign policy, how as senior figures disagreed factions developed around divisions in policy, and the way in which the handling of the international situation formed a strand of the opposition to Stalin and the Politburo majority in 1926.4 The British General Strike ran from 4-12 May 1926. Although it drew British industry to a halt, and hadn’t been planned much in advance, there had been ample warning of a coming labour dispute, of which the British and Soviet Governments were well aware, although the Soviets had concluded that major action was unlikely I am grateful to Paul Gregory and Alexander Vatlin for their assistance in the writing of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Provisions Underlying Trade Unions' Right to Define Their
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SCIENCE EDUCATION 2016, VOL. 11, NO. 10, 3925-3936 OPEN ACCESS Legislative Provisions Underlying Trade Unions’ Right to Define Their Organizational Structure Victoria V. Korobchenkoa, Yury V. Penova and Valery A.Safonova aSaint Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, RUSSIA ABSTRACT The article contains a comparative analysis of constitutional and other legislative provisions that ensure a trade union’s right to define its own administrative structure in European states. The aim of the study is to reveal the management’s problems of European trade unions, declarative and empirical mass-character legislative provisions, which allow to structure trade unions by themselves. The result is that the state should not set forth an exhaustive list of various types of trade unions. The article also examines the authority of trade union associations to define the requirements imposed on their members’ charters. These requirements are argued to comply with the principle of the freedom of association. Moreover, the work reveals that many European legislative provisions are declarated but rarely realized in sphere of inner management. The novelty of the research is the comparative analytic review, basing on the modern local and collective European laws. KEYWORDS ARTICLE HISTORY Trade union, freedom of association, trade union Received 18 March 2016 associations, trade union charter Revised 03 May 2016 Accepted 22 May 2016 Introduction The right to freedom of association is an integral part of a person’s constitutional rights. In labour sphere, workers exercise it and employees either form or join trade unions that serve to protect their rights and interests. According to International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the freedom of association and effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining belong to the major principles of the labour sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Unions Are Organisations That Represent People at Work
    What do trade i unions do? This is a basic guide to what a trade union is, what we do and why you should join. What is a trade union? Trade unions are organisations that represent people at work. ‘Representing’ 1could mean someone from the union meeting with management on behalf of a member or a group of staff or taking up a problem with your employer for you. Trade unions aim to protect their members. This includes making sure that 2workplaces are safe and that people’s health is not being put at risk through their jobs. It also means legal protection – trade unions usually employ lawyers to make sure that companies and organisations treat their staff in accordance with the law. Trade unions aim to improve their members’ pay and conditions. If a single 3member of staff approaches management because they feel they should be paid more, they are much less likely to be successful than if every member of staff speaks as one through their trade union. Trade unions collectively negotiate better pay and conditions on behalf of their members and, statistically, union members earn more than non-union members. What do trade unions do? l Trade unions speak on behalf of their members. l Trade unions provide members with information, advice and guidance about work-related problems. l Trade unions provide members with a range of services including training, insurance, financial services and legal advice. UCU factsheet 01 What do trade i unions do? l Trade unions bargain with employers to get better pay for members.
    [Show full text]
  • The SLP and the USSR Alist Tendency” in the World Socialist Movement in the Wake of the Col- Lapse of the Second International
    TheThe SLPSLP andand TheThe USSRUSSR From the Bolshevik Revolution To the Nazi-Soviet Pact Socialist Labor Party of America P.O. Box 218 Mountain View, CA 94042-0218 www.slp.org • [email protected] Contents Introduction . 3 1. Response to the October Revolution . 12 2. The SLP and the Third International . 19 3. Stalin, the Purges and World War II . 28 Appendix: De Leon and the 1905 Revolution . 36 2 Introduction The publication of this pamphlet fills a long-felt gap in Socialist Labor Party literature. Drawing on the Party’s internal organizational history as well as its public record, the pamphlet traces the evolution of the SLP’s attitude toward the U.S.S.R. from its first response to the October Revolution in 1917 through its refusal to join the Third Inter- national to its final break with the Soviet Union on the eve of World War II. For the first time, it sets down in one place the SLP’s history on one of the key questions of the 20th century. Since the pamphlet does this quite well, there is no need to restate its contents here. Instead, by way of introduction, the opportunity presents itself to shed some light on one of the secondary themes of the pamphlet, namely the relationship between Lenin, Daniel De Leon and the SLP. Specifically, what did Lenin know of De Leon and the party associated with his name, and in what light should Lenin’s statements on De Leon (statements well known to those familiar with SLP history) be viewed? Although the current pamphlet touches on this topic insofar as it affect- ed the SLP’s early attitude toward Russia, more complete information helps to fill out the picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Unions
    session 13. 1 march 1922, noon Trade Unions Reports on the trade-union question. Chair: Kolarov. Speakers: Zinoviev, Bokányi, Lozovsky, Brandler. Zinoviev: We have present with us in this hall a delegation of Hungarian com- rades who have been released from the prisons of white Hungary and arrived in Moscow yesterday. These are comrades who conducted themselves heroically and also acted as revolutionary fighters during the trial. (Bokányi of the Hungarian delegation was given the floor. He eloquently greeted the Russian workers and the Third International. The session then moved to the next point on the agenda.) Reports on Trade-Union Question Lozovsky: I will speak first of the trade-union question’s general importance. The provisional council of trade-union federations, established on 15 June 1920 at the trade-union Zimmerwald, did not at first have a clear programme. The first congress of revolutionary trade unions was held in Moscow 3–19 July 1921. It laid the foundation stone of the great trade-union international.1 In building the Red International of Labour Unions there has been a contra- diction from the outset. It includes, on the one hand, entire organisations, as in Russia, Yugoslavia, and Spain and, on the other hand, minorities in the old reformist organisations. It consists of four currents: 1.) A rather large number of Communists, who have a precise and clearly defined programme. 1 A reference to the July 1921 founding congress of the Red International of Labour Unions (RILU, also referred to as the Profintern, based on its name in Russian). The ‘provisional coun- cil’ formed in June 1920 was the International Council of Trade and Industrial Unions.
    [Show full text]
  • Organising Precarious Workers: Trade Union and Co-Operative Strategies
    Organising Precarious Workers: Trade Union and Co-operative Strategies A report for the TUC from Co-operatives UK and the Co-operative College . Acknowledgements We are very grateful to Carl Roper and the TUC for commissioning this report. We would also like to thank those interviewed whose expertise and guidance has been invaluable. The TUC member trade unions that responded to our survey were very helpful to us as have been the trade unions in the USA, the Netherlands and Italy that we made contact with. We are especially grateful to Paul Bell (Unison), Diane Widdison (The Musicians Union), John Park (Community Union), Andrew Morris (NUT), Martin Smith (ex‐GMB), Kevin Brandstatter (GMB), Maria Ludkin (GMB), Les McVay (City Cabs), Mark Hooper (IndyCube), Adrian Roper (Cartrefi Cymru Co‐operative), Dr. Guy Turnbull (CASA), Laurie Gregory (The Foster Care Co‐ operative), Rick Wilson (Community Lives Consortium), Bruno Roelants (CECOP‐CICOPA Europe), Sarah de Heusch Ribassin (SMart, Belgium), Michael Peck (1Worker1Vote ‐ USA), Camille Kerr (ICA Group ‐ USA), Kevin Ford, Kim Matthews and Elizabeth Matthews. Pat Conaty (Co-operatives UK), Alex Bird (consultancy.coop) and Cilla Ross (The Co-operative College) 2 Foreword The trade union movement faces a number of big challenges as it seeks to continue to be a genuine and effective voice for working people. Not least amongst these is how trade unions organise and represent the ever increasing number of people in vulnerable or precarious employment. One emerging way to help vulnerable workers make their jobs better is through the formation of worker co‐operatives. The TUC, as part of its Rethinking Organising series, asked Co‐operatives UK and the Co‐operative College to report on the good practice examples of vulnerable and self‐employed workers self‐ organising and working with trade unions in the UK, Europe and in the Unites States and to set out their recommendations on how this work between trade unions and co‐operatives can be developed and widened.
    [Show full text]