Alpine Treeline Changes in the Central Rocky Mountains: a Progress Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alpine Treeline Changes in the Central Rocky Mountains: a Progress Report GC41A-0111 Alpine Treeline Changes in the Central Rocky Mountains: A Progress Report Connie A. Woodhouse, Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona University of Colorado Boulder ([email protected]), and Jeffrey J. Lukas, INSTAAR, University of Colorado ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION MONARCH PASS SITE COTTONWOOD PASS Mountain environments are expected to be extremely sensitive to human-induced changes in SITE DESCRIPTION SITE DESCRIPTION climate, and the impacts of climate change on mountain regions are already well- documented in western North America. Changes in the elevation, composition, and structure This site is directly east and above Monarch Pass on the This site is located about 1 km west of alpine treeline can reflect climate variability and change, as well as patterns of disturbance Continental Divide in Colorado. The current treeline forest of Cottonwood Pass, at the which themselves may be mediated by climate variability. Information about past treelines is composed of primarily Englemann spruce, with a few Continental Divide. There is no clear may provide insight into the likely character of future changes. subalpine fir. The actual treeline is variable in elevation, evidence for a previously higher but generally about 3500 meters. Remnants were scattered treeline, but there is evidence of fire Studies of past treelines are possible in areas where wood remnants above the current in a line roughly 10-50 meters above the current treeline, and a denser forest prior to burning. treeline are well preserved due to cold, dry climate conditions. Alpine treeline changes roughly tracking the topographic undulations in the current The forest below the burn is sparse, during the late Holocene in the Sierra Nevada have been investigated by a number of treeline. Several old burns are embedded in the treeline. In with some living tree islands above. researchers (e.g., LaMarche and Mooney 1972, Scuderi 1987, Lloyd and Graumlich 1997, addition, there are saplings (Englemann spruce, lodgepole, The burn area is being colonized by a Millar 2007), but to date, no similar studies of late Holocene treeline have been undertaken in limber, and bristlecone pine) above the forest line and the few “krummholz” lodgepole, and by SHEEP MOUNTAIN SITE the central Rocky Mountains. spruce tree islands. limber and bristlecone pine trees. The burned trees appear to be SAMPLING STRATEGY Englemann spruce. Two standing SITE DESCRIPTION In this study, we have begun an snags with bark were burned when 41 N investigation of characteristics of the A. REMNANTS living will help determine the year of This site is located on the northern side of Sheep current and past alpine treeline in the Continental COLORADO Mountain, approximately 10 km west of Leadville, CO. Divide 43 remnants of bristlecone pine or limber pine above the the fire. central Rocky Mountains. The goal of current treeline were photographed, GPSed, and cut with a The forests going up to treeline are bands of 5-needle the study is to document the past and (limber and bristlecone pine), and Engleman spruce, Denver chainsaw. SAMPLING STRATEGY present treeline, and treeline grading into spruce krummholz. The sampling site was relationships to climate and fire, using in a high steep, southfacing drainage with a treeline of 5- B. CURRENT TREELINE Monarch Pass Site Questions From the lower end of the burn, to the dendrochronological techniques. In Sheep Mountain 3 transects were run from the highest tree 100 meters elevation of the highest remnant needle pines and many large, full tree remnants above the summer of 2007, we sampled the living trees. Pine and spruce tree islands extended Cottonwood Pass down into the forest. At 20 m intervals, the six closest trees What is the age of the remnant treeline? To what does it correspond, (3610-3680m), we defined a remnants within and above treeline at the elevation of the remnants, higher along the side of Monarch Pass were measured (DBH and height to coring) and cored. All climatically? rectangular area (100m across and three sites, as well as living trees at other trees, remnants, sapling, and seedlings in a 10 m 200m up/down slope). Within this the drainage. the current treeline (locations are radius were noted. What is the age structure/species composition of the current forest to area, 34 remnants were sampled, shown in the map, right). We also SAMPLING STRATEGY treeline? photographed and GPSed. Each recorded the presence of seedlings 0 50 100 150 200 km C. SAPLINGS ABOVE THE CURRENT TREELINE living tree > 10 cm in diameter was and saplings establishing above the 37 N All saplings above the highest tree island were GPSed, cored, and the locations and 24 remnants were sampled, starting at the highest 109 W 102 W What are the dates of the fires in the two burned areas? Are they concurrent current treeline and disturbances at measured and species were noted. Two young trees were (3545m) to the lowest (3520m) which graded into the Locations of 3 sites in this study with each other, and concurrent with the Cottonwood Pass burn? diameters of smaller living trees was two of the sites in the form of burns. cored. recorded. current treeline forest. Each remnant was photographed The preliminary results for this work and GPSed. In addition, we cored 22 old living trees (a What are the ages of the oldest saplings growing above the current treeline? are reported here. D. BURNED AREAS mix of bristlecone and limber) growing in a stand below Will the saplings survive, eventually raising the current treeline or die in harsh the remnants and around to a cliff above Limber Grove Remnants at two burns within the treeline were sampled conditions? (12 and 20 samples) and GPSed. (a previously sampled stand of old limber pine). Cottonwood Pass Site Questions Preliminary Results Sheep Mountain Pass Questions Remnant Treeline What is the date of the fire? From the What are dates of remnants and we determine the date of trees establishment? era of miners or earlier? Concurrent To date, 21 remnants have been dated. The inside and outside dates are shown (below), while drought and/or the Monarch burn? tree abundance (binned by century after Lloyd and Graumlich 1997), are shown (below, right ). No When did the living trees become established? adjustments have been made yet for the loss of sapwood and lack of pith in most samples, but What was the species and age results give a rough first look at approximate dates these trees were alive and growing above the Are the remnants a distinctly different population composition of the burned forest? current treeline. (time-wise) from the living trees? Are there trees currently in this burn area If not, can an extended tree-ring chronology be that are survivors of the fire or have all of compiled from both remnant and living tree collections? them established since the fire? What climate variable limits tree-growth at this site? Monarch Pass samples Transect Plot Is the climate signal different for the limber and Remnants - inside dates bristlecone pine trees? 300 BC - AD 1 A AD 400 - 800 Undated Current treeline References Summit The current treeline forest is composed almost entirely of Engelmann spruce trees, saplings and LaMarche, V. C., and H. A. Mooney. 1967. Altithermal timberline advance in western United States. Nature 213, 980- 3626m C A comparison with seedlings. Estimated pith dates of the trees, grouped into 20-yr age classes, are spread from the 982. 1630s to the 1960s, with a peak in the late 19th century (above). A preliminary chronologies (12 Salzer and Lloyd, A.H. and L.J. Graumlich. 1997. Holocene dynamics of treeline forests in the Sierra Nevada. Ecology 78, 1199- Monarch samples) of standard ring widths shows a rapid shift from high growth to low growth just prior to an Pass Kipfmueller. ’s 1210. 3448m (1997) temperature increase in pith dates, but whether this is related or just a coincidence is unknown (above. top). Millar, C.I. 2007. Treeline Response to Climate: Up, Down, All Around. Presentation for CNPS at White Mountain reconstruction (left) 200m B Research Station, CA. suggests Within the forest, a large number of Englemann spruce trees at this site are seedlings and saplings has established in the last two Salzer, M.W. and K.F. Kipfmueller. 2005. Reconstructed temperature and precipitation on a millennial timescale from tree rings in the southern Colorado Plateau, U.S.A. Climatic Change 70, 465 - 487 sensitive to decades (right). In contrast, above the current treeline, Locations of remnant samples and transects summer small trees, saplings and seedlings are mostly a mix of Scuderi, L. A. 1987. Late-Holocene upper timberline variation in the southern Sierra Nevada. Nature 325, 242-244. (A, B, C) for sampling the current treeline temperatures spruce (11) and 5-needle pines (19, limber and forest are shown above. Undated remnants bristlecone). either do not overlap in age with dated Acknowledgements This work was made possible through the interest and support of Robert S. Thompson and the Earth Surface Processes remnants or have too few rings to accurately - Central Region of the U.S. Geological Survey. We thank Mark Losleben, Kurt Chowanski, and Cody Routson for field crossdate. assistance..
Recommended publications
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Memo Monarch Pass U.S. Forest Service San Isabel National Forest Salida Ranger District Chaffee County, Colorado
    Decision Memo Monarch Pass U.S. Forest Service San Isabel National Forest Salida Ranger District Chaffee County, Colorado BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE & NEED Background: Beginning in the early 2000’s in the Weminuche Wilderness of southern Colorado, a spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) epidemic began expanding north. During stand exam field procedures in 2012, within the Monarch Mountain Ski area, active spruce beetle infestation was discovered on several plots. Further reconnaissance discovered scattered spruce beetle populations in the Monarch Mountain Ski area, Old Monarch Pass and Monarch Park areas. Prior to this time no active spruce beetle infestation had been observed in these areas. Since 2012, spruce beetle activity has increased and is now at epidemic levels across the Monarch Pass area. In some stands, mortality of the mature overstory is approaching 75 percent. In Colorado, spruce beetle has affected over 1.7 million acres since 1996. Figure 1. Example of forest conditions in the Monarch Pass area (early spring 2017). Photo by A. Rudney. — Decision Memo — Page 1 of 23 Figure 2. Example of trees killed by spruce beetle. Photo by A. Rudney. Western balsam bark beetle (Dryocoetes confusus) has been affecting stands within the ski area and across the Monarch Pass area since the early 2000’s. Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) forests in the area are at high risk for mountain pine beetle infestation (Dendroctonus ponderosae) due to mature age, tree size and density. In addition, increased snag (dead standing trees) levels within the ski area have exposed visitors to a higher risk of falling trees. The increase in mortality is leading to increased fuel loading and higher risks for firefighters attempting initial or extended attack on wildland fires within the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health & Wildfire Resiliency
    Chaffee Common Ground Funding Recommendation June 1, 2021 Page 1 of 4 The Chaffee Common Ground Citizens Advisory Committee recommends $2,448,241 in awards to 18 recipients during the Spring 2021 grant funding cycle. Twenty applications requesting $2.92 million were received. The package includes $2,015,600 for forest health and wildfire resilience, $249,640 to sustain rural landscapes, and $183,001 for recreation management that protects watersheds and landscapes in Chaffee County. Matching cash and in-kind funds associated with these recommendations equal $10,529.35, bringing a potential $12,977,859.35 in investments to the community. The following are the applications received with the amounts requested. Following each description, is the recommended funding. Forest Health & Wildfire Resiliency Monarch Pass Forest & Watershed Health Project $65,000 in 2021 to Arkansas River Watershed Collaborative (ARWC) to complete a 125-acre portion of the 2,809-acre U.S. Forest Service Monarch Pass Vegetation Management Project. Planned treatments are located on the lower slopes of Monarch Ridge near Monarch Park and both sides of US Highway 50 near Old Monarch Pass Road and Monarch Mountain ski area. ARWC’s mission is to serve Arkansas River Basin Communities by addressing locally identified watershed issues for economic, ecological and social benefit. Ranked 6th Recommended Funding: $50,000 in 2021 Focused Fuels Reduction for Fire Ready Communities $300,000 over three years to Colorado State University/Colorado State Forest Service for 260 acres of wildfire risk reduction and forest restoration work in five locations: Broadview along Count Road 289; Three Elk’s community green space; Kiowa Road near Mesa Antero; County Road 325 south of Lost Creek Ranch; and Poncha Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Table of Contents................................................................................................................1 Chapter I: Introduction .......................................................................................................3 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................................................3 Scope of plan..........................................................................................................................................................3 Goals of Plan..........................................................................................................................................................3 Recommendations..................................................................................................................................................3 Public Process ........................................................................................................................................................3 Chapter II: Chaffee County Overview................................................................................4 A. Chaffee County Information.............................................................................................................................4 B. Trails in Chaffee County...................................................................................................................................4 United
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
    Environmental Assessment Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Relocation CHAPTER 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES A. Background This section describes the current condition of resources in the Study Area, and the potential effects that the proposed action and its alternatives may have on these resources. Impacts to the environment are considered in terms of their direct, indirect and cumulative effects. Definitions for these effects are as follows (40 CFR 1508.7 and 1508.8): • Direct effects – Effects caused by the action and occurring at the same time and place. • Indirect effects – Effects caused by the action, but occurring later in time or further removed in place. • Cumulative effects – Incremental impacts of the proposed activities when added to other past, present and foreseeable future actions, regardless of what agency (Federal or non- Federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Direct, indirect and cumulative effects can result from the No Action Alternative. These effects would occur through the continuation of ongoing management practices and activities. The cumulative effects analysis considers activities on all lands in the project vicinity. Activities that have been occurring for many years, are currently ongoing, or are expected to continue into the near future include: logging; road building; road use and road maintenance; recreational activities; prescribed burning, wildland fires and wildland fire suppression; and mining and mineral exploration. As discussed above, effects discussed in this chapter focus primarily on direct, indirect and cumulative long-term effects resulting from the implementation of an alternative. Any short- term effects from new trails related primarily to construction would be temporary and minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaffee County, Colorado, and Incorporated Areas
    CHAFFEE COUNTY, Chaffee County COLORADO, AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 2 COMMUNITY COMMUNNITY NAME NUMBER BUENA VISTA, TOWN OF 080030 CHAFFEE COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 080269 PONCHA SPRINGS, TOWN OF 080220 SALIDA, CITY OF 080031 Effective: December 7, 2017 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 08015CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS report may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS report may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Date: December 7, 2017. TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1- December 7, 2017 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 3 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 12 2.3 Principal Flood Problems 17 2.4 Flood Protection Measures 20 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS 21 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses 21 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses 22 3.3 Vertical
    [Show full text]
  • 1 OVERVIEW in 2012, the Salida Ranger District of The
    TO: Ben Lara, Salida Ranger District, Pike and San Isabel National Forests FROM: Benjamin Rasmussen and Lauren Deaderick, U.S. Department of Transportation Volpe Center SUBJECT: Alternative Transportation Options in, to, and proximate to the Salida Ranger District DATE: August 2013 CC: Rosana Barkawi and Chris Sporl, USFS; Eric Plosky and Lindsey Morse, Volpe Center OVERVIEW In 2012, the Salida Ranger District of the Pike and San Isabel National Forest (Salida District) asked the U.S . Department of Transportation (DOT) John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center) to identify options to provide or enhance alternative transportation service from Salida, Colorado, to Monarch Mountain Ski Area. The Volpe Center identified an option to expand current Salida Shuttle service to run more days per week, more roundtrips per day, and more weeks of the year. Working with the Volpe Center, the Salida District submitted a grant application to the last round of the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks (TRIP) Program in September 2012, but the application was not selected for funding. Ridership on the Salida Shuttle during the 2012-2013 ski season was significantly lower than in previous years. In light of this decline and the unsuccessful TRIP application, the Salida District decided not to pursue the expansion of Salida Shuttle service. Instead, the Salida District would like to promote ridesharing to Monarch Mountain Ski Area from the towns of Salida, Buena Vista, and Poncha Springs. Additionally, the Salida District would like to determine if people from the Front Range (Pueblo and Colorado Spring s) would be willing to take alternative transportation to the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Uranium Deposits of the Gochetopa and Marshall Pass Districts, Saguache and Gunnison Counties, Colorado
    Geology and Uranium Deposits of the Gochetopa and Marshall Pass Districts, Saguache and Gunnison Counties, Colorado U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRO FESS I 6N A L P A PE R 1457 AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • RGNF Draft Record of Decision & Biological Assessment
    Draft Record of Decision Village at Wolf Creek Access Project United States Department Final Environmental Impact Statement of Agriculture Forest Service USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Rio Grande National Forest Divide Ranger District Mineral County, Colorado United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service Rio Grande National Forest 1803 West Highway 160 Monte Vista, Colorado 81144 July 19, 2018 Table of Contents Number / Section Page 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background and Location.............................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Decision ......................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 The Decision .............................................................................................................................. 7 4.2 Selected Alternative................................................................................................................... 8 4.2.1 Best Management Practices ................................................................................................ 9 4.2.2 Monitoring .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Bill's Cowboys Abroad
    ( ---._ ~ - ---· Buffalo Bill's Cowboys Abroad BY CLIFFORD P. WESTERMEIER Before Buffalo Bill's Wild West show appeared, the cowboy was both a hero and an antihero, depending upon the image created by the authors of dime novels and the writers of articles for newspapers and periodicals. The "hired man on horseback," either glorified or dishonored, was the victim of the pens of many individuals who were not qualified to judge his worth. Further­ more, three years following the launching of the Wild West show (1883), chroniclers of the cowboy began bidding him farewell. "The Decayed Cowboy," "On a Western Ranche," "Cattle Trails of the Prairies," "The Passing of the Cowboy," "A Fading Race," "The Passing of the Cow-Puncher," and "Goodbye to the American Cowboy" were predictive and presumptuous titles of articles pushing his bad-good and good-bad image from the scene. 1 Buffalo Bill may have "started the cowboy hero on his way," but the vast literature that surrounds William Frederick Cody certainly does not reveal any particular effort on his part to do more than enhance his own ego. 2 In fact, the Indian members of his traveling troupe fared far better, at least photographically. However, the ordinary spectator, the notables, and particularly the members of the press were fascinated and enthralled with the cowboy. This was the era of that supershowman "Buffalo Bill" as well as numerous others, among them James Butler Hickok-"Wild Bill," Gordon W. Lillie-"Pawnee Bill," and 1 Clifford P. Westermeier, Trailing the Cowboy (Caldwell, Idaho: Caxton Printers, 1955), pp. 383-90.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Consideration of Comments Monarch Pass Vegetation Management Project San Isabel National Forest
    APPENDIX B CONSIDERATION OF COMMENTS MONARCH PASS VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FOREST The comment period was conducted from May 8, 2017 to June 9, 2017. A total of nine comment letters were received. Below are the consideration of comments received. Index of Letters: Letter No. Author Organization Date 2 Burton, Chuck PSI – RAC 2017.05.15 5 Goodwin, Neilie Western Area Power Administration 2017.06.08 4 Hardgrave, Kathryn Colorado State Forest Service 2017.06.06 1 Lange, Damon Colorado State Forest Service 2017.05.08 6 Maxwell, Kent Colorado Firecamp 2017.05.09 7 Myers, Karl Tri-State Generation and Transmission 2017.06.09 Association, Inc. 3 Pressly, Scott Monarch Mountain 2017.05.24 9 Sailor, Rand 2017.06.23 8 Sobal, Tom Quiet Use Coalition 2017.06.09 COMMENT COMMENT CONSIDERATION OF COMMENT SUBJECT D.Lange1 Looks like a very fine project. Supportive comment. Project C.Burton1 This email is in support of your proposed spruce beetle management Supportive comment. Project efforts, i.e. sanitation and salvage of the trees in the Monarch Pass area. S.Pressly1 I am writing on behalf of Monarch Mountain in support of the proposed Supportive comment. Project Monarch Pass Vegetation Management Project. While these tactics are helping to protect our infrastructure, a larger plan such as the Monarch Pass Vegetation Management Project must be considered for the overall health of the forest and improved margin of safety for our operations here on Monarch Pass. The proposed project is an excellent step towards mitigating the beetle infested tree issues here on the pass and helping to maintain a viable ski area business here at Monarch.
    [Show full text]
  • BOREAL TOAD (Bufo Boreas Boreas)
    CONSERVATION PLAN AND AGREEMENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND RECOVERY OF THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN POPULATION OF THE BOREAL TOAD (Bufo boreas boreas) Prepared by The Boreal Toad Recovery Team and Technical Advisory Group Chuck Loeffler, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Coordinator/Editor sed February 2001 Revised February 2001 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Forest Service, Region 2 U.S. Forest Service, Carson National Forest Colorado Division of Wildlife Wyoming Game & Fish Department New Mexico Department of Game & Fish U.S. Bureau of Land Management USGS/Biological Resources Division NPS/Rocky Mountain National Park U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Colorado Natural Heritage Program DEDICATION This Conservation Plan is dedicated to Mr. Chris Garber who died in an avalanche on January 7, 1996, while cross-country skiing in the Snowy Range Mountains of Wyoming. Chris spent many hours searching for the boreal toad and was a key source of information on the toad in Wyoming. The Boreal Toad Recovery Team and his many friends and colleagues will sorely miss him, and the world will miss his dedication to wildlife conservation. We hope his spirit has found the joy and tranquility he sought in life. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . .1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND, BASIS, & PURPOSE ........................................................................................4 BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION & STATUS Species Description &
    [Show full text]