DOCSLIB.ORG

Battle of Brier Creek Battle of Brier Creek

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Battle of Brier Creek Battle of Brier Creek +ISVKME©W+ISVKME©W The Battle of Brier Creek 6IZSPYXMSREV];EV6IZSPYXMSREV];EV he Battle of Brier Creek was the pivotal encoun- Tter which decided the fate of Georgia for three years in the American Revolution. The disparity in 1 preparedness, military training, and intelligence 3 about the enemy’s movements gave a superior ad- 2 vantage to the King’s army. The British skillful battle 4 “Discovering Our Heritage maneuver encircling the Patriots, successful decoy and History” and surprise charge into the Patriots camp ensured 5 the British victory. The total rout of the Patriots re-es- tablished Georgia as a Royal Colony—the only one of the Thirteen American Colonies to do so --- until 6 the British were forced to evacuate in 1782. Battle of Col. Samuel Elbert, com- manding Georgia Continentals 7 MAp OF and Georgia Militia, made GEORGIA, 8 1778 one of the most gallant Brier Creek stands against overwhelm- ing odds during the Revo- lutionary War. After Patriot . March 3, 1779 , Gen. Ashe`s militia had been American Revolution in Georgia routed, Elbert, with his back 1 Elbert County – Fight at Van(n)’s Creek to Brier Creek and surrounded GPS: N34.162 W82.744 Brier Creek was the pivotal on the other sides, attempted to 2 Wilkes County – Battle of Kettle Creek encounter which re-established fight his way through the British lines. GPS: N33.691 W82.886 It was only after British reserves intervened that he Georgia as a Royal Colony. surrendered the remnants of his courageous com- 3 Lincoln County – Elijah Clarke & John Dooly: mand. Of the 150 Americans killed in the Battle of Heroes of the Hornet’s Nest Brier Creek more than half were Elbert`s men. His GPS: N33.856 W82.410 life was spared but he was captured and imprisoned 4 Augusta – Sieges of Augusta and Revolutionary for two years. When exchanged, he took part in the Capital of Georgia GPS: N33.476 W81.964 Battle of Yorktown where he was promoted to Gen- eral. After the Revolutionary War in 1785, Samuel 5 Screven County -- Battle of Brier Creek Elbert was elected Governor of Georgia. GPS: N32.811 W81.466 Samuel Elbert, courtesy of Hargrett Rare Book and Library, University 6 Savannah -- Battles of Savannah, of Georgia Libraries. Royal & Revolutionary Capital of Georgia GPS: N32.076 W81.100 The Battle of Brier Creek Historical Mark- er is located off Brannen Bridges Road in 7 Liberty County – Sunbury, Fort Morris & Midway the Tuckahoe Wildlife Management Area, in GPS: N31.764 W81.279 Screven County, Georgia. 8 St. Simons Island –Frederica Naval Action Annual Celebration of GPS: N31.224 W81.393 Battle of Brier Creek www.grwt.gassar.org Saturday prior to March 3rd Georgia Society Sons “Battle Site” Screven County, GA of the American Revolution GPS: N32.811 W81.466 Design – Ed Fluker, GASSAR Map compiled by Clyde Hollingsworth, 1953 were formed with much confusion. The New Bern N.C. Militia was to the left against Battle of BURTON’S FERRY Brier Creek with Col. Samuel Elbert and his Conti- nentals in the center and the Edenton N.C. Militia Brier Creek to the right. Seventy yards behind were the Hali- fax and Wilmington N.C. Militia. Facing the Patri- ots were Sir James Baird’s Light Infantry on the left, . , March 3, 1779 High- Prevost’s 2nd Battalion 71st Highland Regiment in n the fall of 1778, British Lord Germain directed landers the center, and Carolina Loyalists to the right. The ISir Henry Clinton to subdue the Carolinas and up the Florida Grenadiers, Light Dragoons and Rangers Georgia. His “Southern Strategy” was based on the River Road were in the rear. Royal Governors’ statements that Loyalist militia as a diversion. The British opened with artillery fire into the Pa- could be recruited to return these Colonies to the Prevost with triots’ center. Ashe ordered Elbert forward and to Crown. Lt. Col. Archibald Campbell was dispatched over 1,000 the left within thirty yards of the Highlanders, but this from New York to Savannah which he captured on men reached movement cut off many in the New Bern Militia. The December 29, 1778. Campbell then proceeded to Paris Mill on Edenton Militia advanced, but with the threat of be- Augusta to recruit Loyalists in the back country. Af- the morning of ing flanked, opened a gap in the center. The High- ter realizing limited success and fearing the gath- March 2, after a landers surged into the gap with a bayonet charge, ering Patriot forces, in mid-February, he decided long all-night forced march. Finding and the Patriot militia began to break and run in a to retreat to Hudson’s Ferry on the Savannah River the bridge destroyed by the Patriots, disorderly retreat. Almost alone, Elbert’s men stood in Effingham (current Screven) County. Campbell Prevost used materials from the Paris and fought, pressed against Brier Creek. So fiercely learned of Lt. Col. Boyd’s defeat at Kettle Creek house and flatboats and completed did these Georgians fight, the British had to bring when Maj. William Spurgen and other survivors re- the crossing on the morning of March 3, up reserves that quickly overwhelmed Elbert’s men. joined his forces. about fifteen miles above Ashe’s camp. Elbert was knocked to the ground by a Highlander Maj. Gen. Benjamin Lincoln, Continental Army When Ashe returned from Lincoln’s war council for dispatch by bayonet, but was saved by a British Southern Department Commander, developed a on March 2, he ordered a path cleared to Matthew’s officer after making the Masonic sign of distress. plan to retake Savannah and secure Georgia. Lincoln Bluff to aid Rutherford’s crossing and received word Ashe pursued his retreating troops on horse- ordered Gen. John Ashe’s North Carolina Militia to from scouts who had no knowledge of Prevost’s back in an attempt to rally them, but to no avail, rebuild the Freeman- Miller Bridge at Brier Creek in forces at Paris Mill. During the morning of March and escaped at Matthew’s Bluff with many others. Burke (current Screven) County and await reinforce- 3, Ashe sent Maj. John Ross with 300 dragoons to The total dead on the Patriot side were at least ments. On February 27, Gen. Ashe with 1,300 men assess the British forces at Hudson’s Ferry which 150 with over 200 captured, including Col. Elbert arrived at the bridge, and was immediately sum- Ashe intended to attack as soon as Rutherford’s and Lt. Col John McIntosh. An unknown number moned to a council of war at nearby Black Swamp by reinforcements arrived. Ross discovered the British were drowned attempting to cross the river. Col. Gen. Lincoln. Gen. Rutherford at Black Swamp and had moved north, but did not report it to Ashe. John Dooly and his Wilkes County Militia arrived Gen. Andrew Williamson near Augusta were ordered As Prevost moved south on the River Road to- on March 4, and buried the Patriot dead most likely by Lincoln to join Ashe at Brier Creek and launch an ward Ashe’s camp on March 3, he encountered in a mass grave. The British only lost five men with offensive to drive the British back to Savannah. scouts and took them prisoner. Late in the after- eleven wounded. At Hudson’s Ferry, Campbell relinquished his noon, Prevost’s men skirmished with the forward Following the Battle, Lt. Col. Prevost was made command to Lt. Col. Mark Prevost, who was the line of Ashe’s pickets and gunfire was heard in the acting Royal Governor of Georgia until Sir James brother of Maj. Gen. Augustine Prevost, Commander Patriot camp. An express rider galloped in to inform Wright’s return to Savannah. Patriot Gen. Ashe was of the British Southern forces. Realizing the urgency Ashe of the imminent attack by the British coming acquitted at court martial but was censured for his of rapid deployment, Campbell instructed Prevost down the road six abreast. Ashe ordered the beat failure to prepare his soldiers against attack. to immediately proceed northwestward to Paris to arms, but cartridges had not been issued and Prepared by Rabun A. (Alex) Lee, Mill Creek Chapter, Mill, cross Brier Creek and attack Ashe from the rear. men grabbed what they could. Many guns had the and edited by Bill Ramsaur, Marshes of Glynn Chapter, Campbell also directed Maj. Duncan McPherson’s wrong bore for the ammunition, and battle lines Georgia Society Sons of the American Revolution, .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Battle of the Shallow Ford
    Bethabara Chapter of Winston-Salem North Carolina State Society Sons of the American Revolution The Bethabara Bugler Volume 1, Issue 22 November 1, 2020 Chartered 29 October 1994 Re-Organized 08 November 2014. The Bethabara Bugler is the Newsletter of the Bethabara Chapter of Winston-Salem. It is, under normal circumstances, published monthly (except during the months of June, July, and August when there will only be one summer edition). It will be distributed by email, usually at the first of the month. Articles, suggestions, and ideas are welcome – please send them to: Allen Mollere, 3721 Stancliff Road, Clemmons, NC 27012, or email: [email protected]. ----------------------------------------- Bethabara Chapter Meetings As you are aware, no Bethabara Chapter SAR on-site meetings have been held recently due to continuing concerns over the Corona virus. On September 10, 2020, the Bethabara Chapter did conduct a membership meeting via Zoom. ----------------------------------------- Page 1 of 19 Commemoration of Battle of the Shallow Ford Forty-seven individuals wearing protective masks due to the Covid-19 pandemic, braved the inclement weather on Saturday, October 10, 2020 to take part in a modified 240th Commemoration Ceremony of the Battle of the Shallow Ford at historic Huntsville UM Church. Hosted by the Winston-Salem Bethabara Chapter of the Sons of The American Revolution (SAR), attendees included visitors, Compatriots from the Alamance Battleground, Bethabara, Nathanael Greene, Catawba Valley, and Yadkin Valley SAR Chapters as well as Daughters of The American Revolution (DAR) attendees from the Battle of Shallow Ford, Jonathan Hunt, Leonard's Creek, Colonel Joseph Winston, and Old North State Chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Letters of Janet Schaw, Loyalists In
    MAKING THE REVOLUTION: AMERICA, 1763-1791 PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION Library of Congress “farewell, unhappy land . you are devoted to ruin” A Scottish visitor views the treatment of Loyalists in North Carolina, 1775 Selections from the travel letters of Janet Schaw * While traveling for two years in North America, Scotswoman Janet Schaw arrived in North Carolina in early 1775 to visit her brother at Schawfield, his plantation near the port city of Wilmington. There she observed a society that was splitting asunder under the stress of revolutionary politics. Zealous patriots were forcing men and women along the Cape Fear River to take sides. They employed violence and Bowles, North America and the West Indies, map, intimidation and, Schaw suggests, even feigned a slave revolt to unite 1775, detail including middle and southern British their countrymen in opposition to the British. As the editor of Schaw’s Atlantic colonies; Wilmington, NC, encircled journal reminds us, “such contemporary evidence makes us realize that our forefathers, however worthy their object, were engaged in real rebellion and revolution, characterized by the extremes of thought and action that always accompany such movements, and not in the kind of parlor warfare described in many of our text books.”1 Spirited, intelligent, and outspoken, the daughter of an old and appa- rently well-off Scottish family, she was in her late thirties or early forties when she sailed for America. After leaving North Carolina, she visited Portugal and returned to Scotland in 1776, where she took up residence in Edinburgh. While the details of most of her life are unknown, her journal, a compilation of letters to a friend back in Scotland, provides a vivid record of her two years of travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Proposed National Register/Georgia Register Nomination
    SUMMARY OF PROPOSED NATIONAL REGISTER/GEORGIA REGISTER NOMINATION 1. Name: Brier Creek Battlefield 2. Location: Approximately one mile south of Old River Road along Brannen Bridge Road, Sylvania vicinity, Screven County, Georgia 3a. Description: Brier Creek Battlefield is located largely within the state of Georgia’s Tuckahoe Wildlife Management Area (WMA) in Screven County. The battlefield is delineated in the Georgia Archaeological Site Files as archaeological Site 9SN254. The National Register historic district boundary comprises 2,686 acres of this site: 2,521.3 acres are owned by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources as part of the Tuckahoe WMA, while 164.7 acres are privately owned by Warsaw Pines and Timberland LLC, in a silviculture area known locally as Chisolm Farm. These two tracts contain thirteen contributing resources and one noncontributing resource, all of which are archaeological sites, clustered in the western half of the district. The battlefield is located on a natural peninsula formed by the confluence of Brier Creek and the Savannah River. The topography is relatively low and flat, and vegetation consists of mature stands of planted loblolly pine trees actively managed for silviculture. Anhydric soils in the peninsula are surrounded by wet, swampy cypress forests which border Brier Creek and the Savannah River. A dirt road loops the peninsula, running southeast from Brannen Bridge Road. The property’s integrity of location and association are evidenced by historic documentation along with the recovery of military artifacts during archaeological studies, while the open pine forest, bordering cypress swamps, and the battlefield’s overall rural character effectively portray integrity of setting and feeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Link.Net Chancellor General Davis Lee Wright, Esq., P.O
    SPRING 2018 Vol. 112, No. 4 n Proposed SAR Museum Gallery n 1768: The Year of the Farmer n DNA Found My Brother Congress 2018: Houston Bound SPRING 2018 Vol. 112, No. 4 6 16 6 2018 Congress to Convene 10 America’s Heritage and the 22 Newly Acquired Letters in Houston SAR Library Reveal More About the Maryland 400 7 Amendment Proposal/ 11 The Proposed SAR Museum Leadership Medical Committee Gallery 24 State Society & Chapter News 8 Nominating Committee Report/Butler Awarded 16 250th Series: 1768—The Year 38 In Our Memory/ Medal of Honor of the Farmer New Members 9 Newsletter Competitions 20 DNA Found My Brother 47 When You Are Traveling THE SAR MAGAZINE (ISSN 0161-0511) is published quarterly (February, May, August, November) and copyrighted by the National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution, 809 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202. Periodicals postage paid at Louisville, KY and additional mailing offices. Membership dues include The SAR Magazine. Subscription rate $10 for four consecutive issues. Single copies $3 with checks payable to “Treasurer General, NSSAR” mailed to the HQ in Louisville. Products and services advertised do not carry NSSAR endorsement. The National Society reserves the right to reject content of any copy. Send all news matter to Editor; send the following to NSSAR Headquarters: address changes, election of officers, new members, member deaths. Postmaster: Send address changes to The SAR Magazine, 809 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202. PUBLISHER: STAFF DIRECTORY President General Larry T. Guzy As indicated below, staff members have an email address and an extension number of the automated 4531 Paper Mill Road, SE telephone system to simplify reaching them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina James Matthew Am C Donald Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Politics of the personal in the old north state: Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina James Matthew aM c Donald Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Mac Donald, James Matthew, "Politics of the personal in the old north state: Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3625. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3625 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. POLITICS OF THE PERSONAL IN THE OLD NORTH STATE: GRIFFITH RUTHERFORD IN REVOLUTIONARY NORTH CAROLINA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of History By James M. Mac Donald B.A., University of Delaware, 1995 M.A., Appalachian State University, 1997 May, 2006 To My Parents ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my committee for their support and suggestions during the writing of my dissertation. As a student, I had the good fortune of taking seminars with each member beginning with my first graduate class at LSU. Mark Thompson became director late in the course of the project and generously agreed to chair the committee during the last semester.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Leaders of North Carolina
    North Carolina State Normal & Industrial College Historical Publications Number 2 REVOLUTIONARY LEADERS OF NORTH CAROLINA BY R. D. W. CONNOR SECRETARY NORTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL COMMISSION Lecturer on North Carolina History, State Normal College Issued under the Direction of the Department of History W. C. JACKSON, EDITOR PUBLISHED BY THE COLLEGE 1916 PRESSES OF THE PETRIE COMPANY HIOH POINT. N. C I NORTH CAROLINA FROM 1765 TO 1790 INTRODUCTORY LECTURE Two periods in the history of the United States seem to me to stand out above all others in dramatic interest and historic importance. One is the decade from 1860 to 1870, the other is the quarter-century from 1765 to 1790. Of the two both in interest and importance precedence must be given to the latter. The former was a period of almost superhuman ef fort, achievement, and sacrifice for the preservation of the life of the nation, but it did not evolve any new social, political, or economic principles. Great prin ciples already thought out and established were saved from annihilation, and given a broader scope than ever before in the history of mankind, but no new idea or ideal was involved in the struggle. The ideas and ideals involved in the struggle of the sixties were those that had already been established during the quarter-century from 1765 to 1790. That epoch was a period of origins. Ideas and ideals of government developed in America then came into conflict with the ideas and ideals of Europe. Colonies founded on these new principles revolted against the old, threw off the yoke of their mother country, organized inde pendent states, and having achieved their independ ence, established a self-governing nation on the fed eral principle on a scale never before attempted in the history of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Backcountry Warrior: Brig. Gen. Andrew Williamson the “Benedict Arnold of South Carolina” and America's First Major Double
    Backcountry Warrior: Brig. Gen. Andrew Williamson The “Benedict Arnold of South Carolina” and America’s First Major Double Agent -- Part I BY LLEWELLYN M. TOULMIN, PH. D., F.R.G.S. This two-part series contains the following sections: Introduction Acknowledgements Biography of Brigadier General Andrew Williamson White Hall Possible Link to Liberia Archaeological Reconnaissance of 1978 Archaeological Survey of March 2011 Archaeological Expedition of 2011-12 Conclusions Biographical Note. Introduction Andrew Williamson was a fascinating and very controversial character in South Carolina Revolutionary history. He was loved by his many supporters and reviled by his many enemies. He was called the “Benedict Arnold of South Carolina” for laying down his arms in June 1780 and taking British protection. He surprised his critics, however, by revealing after the war that for a crucial period while living in besieged Charleston he had spied against the British, and had passed vital intelligence to the Americans. Because of his high rank and important information passed on for almost a year, he can fairly be described as “America’s first major double agent.” Despite his fame and notoriety, and historical importance, no biography of Williamson longer than a page or two has ever been published. Furthermore, no book on spy-craft in the Revolution has focused on Williamson or apparently even mentioned him and his spying efforts.1 1 Some of the relevant books that do not mention Williamson’s spying activities include: Harry and Marjorie Mahoney,
    [Show full text]
  • S3430 Jacob Grammer (Gremmer, Grimmer)
    Southern Campaigns American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of Jacob Grammer (Gremmer, Grimmer) S3430 f19NC Transcribed by Will Graves 1/10/08 rev'd 9/22/15 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as
    [Show full text]
  • This 1983 Report Was Revised Into an Article in June 1993 by Wilson Angley for the North Carolina Maritime History Council Journal Tributaries
    AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE EXETER SITE IN PENDER COUNTY by This 1983 report was revised into an article in June 1993 by Wilson Angley for the North Carolina Maritime History Council Journal Tributaries. It was published in the October 199~ issue of that journal . A copy of the June 1993 article submitted has been inserted at the back of the 1983 herein report, as well ~s a copy of the letter about the submission from Angley to Tributaries' editor Mr . Mike Alford. • • • AN HIS'IORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE EXETER SITE IN PENDER CCAJNI'Y • by Wilson Angley September 8, 1982 • From the early stages of European exploration and settlement of North • Caroli na, the lands along the Northeast Cape Fear River and its t ributaries were recognized as a prime area for agricultural development and the produc- tion of lLUnber and naval stores. In August of 1662 the New Englander, William Hilton, set sail from Massachusetts Bay aboard the ship Adventure, bound for the Cape Fear region. After several failures to reach his appointed destination, he entered the mouth of the Cape Fear on the morning of CCtober 4, 1662 . For more than three weeks Hilton and his associates explored the stream. Taking the Adventure as far as present-day Wilmington, he then proceeded by small boat up the Northeast branch, which he took to be a continuation of the main river. Hilton is thought to have reached a point approximately sixty miles upstream from the ocean bar.1 According to historian E. Lawrence Lee ' s reading of Hilton' s own account: He and his associates were pleased with the fertile and • abundant land, with the flourishing vegetation and plentiful game , and with the climate that was ' ye most temperate of ye temperate zone.' They were also impressed by the meadows and upland fields along the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Willtown an Archaeological and Historical Perspective
    willtown an archaeological and historical perspective Archaeological Contributions 27 the Charleston Museum 19 99 Willtown: An Archaeolgocial and Historical Perspective Martha Zierden Suzanne Linder Ronald Anthony with contributions by: Andrew Agha Jennifer Webber Elizabeth Reitz Jean Porter Genevieve Brown James Catto Elizabeth Garrett Hayden Smith Matthew Tankersley Marta Thacker The Charleston Museum Archaeological Contributions 27 May 1999 0c 1999 The South Carolina Department of Archives & History Produced for The Charleston Museum and Hugh C. Lane, Sr. Designer: Judith M. Andrews Assistant: Tim Belshaw ISBN 1-880067-53-6 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................. xi I. Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Site description ................................................................................................. 2 Previous research ............................................................................................... 2 Comparative data base ....................................................................................... 7 Theoretical basis ............................................................................................... 9 Interpretive issues ........................................................................................... 12 II. The Willtown Community Exploration and settlement of Carolina ....................................................... 15 Protection of the colony................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Society, Sons of the American Revolution
    Page 1 The Hornet’s Nest Apr— Jun 2020 Newsletter of The Georgia Society Sons of the American Revolution The April - June 2020 Memorial Day at Arlington: Flags were Posted With the Corona Virus playing havoc across the U.S., many organizations have had to rethink how they do things. The Boy and Girl Scouts, in an abundance of caution, have seen fit to call off their traditional marking of our veteran’s graves with flags this year. But what about Arlington? Everyone knows Arlington is the prime focus of America honoring her dead. “Flags - In,” as it is officially called, has taken place annually since the Old Guard was designated as the Army's official ceremonial unit in 1948. Every available soldier in the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment participates, placing small American flags in front of more than 228,000 headstones and at the bottom of about 7,000 niche rows in the cemetery's Columbarium Courts and Niche Wall. Each flag is inserted into the ground, exactly one boot length from the headstone's base, with the greatest of respect. If the veteran is a Medal of Honor recipient, a salute of honor is given, regardless of the rank held by the soldier presenting the flag. At the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, the Sentinels (who are members of the Old Guard) place flags in front of the headstones and four memorials located on Chaplains' Hill in Section 2, to The President’s Dispatch honor the Unknowns. Within four hours, more than a thousand Old Guard Soldiers will place an American flag upon Greetings Compatriots, every grave.
    [Show full text]