DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1904.10923V1 [Hep-Ph] 24 Apr 2019 Times

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1904.10923V1 [Hep-Ph] 24 Apr 2019 Times A new approach to the LSZ reduction formula John Collins∗ Department of Physics, Penn State University, University Park PA 16802, USA (Dated: 24 April 2019) Lehmann, Symanzik and Zimmermann (LSZ) proved a theorem showing how to obtain the S- matrix from time-ordered Green functions. Their result, the reduction formula, is fundamental to practical calculations of scattering processes. A known problem is that the operators that they use to create asymptotic states create much else besides the intended particles for a scattering process. In the infinite-time limits appropriate to scattering, the extra contributions only disappear in matrix elements with normalizable states, rather than in the created states themselves, i.e., the infinite- time limits of the LSZ creation operators are weak limits. The extra particles that are created are in a different region of space-time than the intended scattering process. To be able to work with particle creation at non-asymptotic times, e.g., to give a transparent and fully deductive treatment for scattering with long-lived unstable particles, it is necessary to have operators for which the infinite-time limits are strong limits. In this paper, I give an improved method of constructing such operators. I use them to give an improved systematic account of scattering theory in relativistic quantum field theories, including a new proof of the reduction formula. Among the features of the new treatment are explicit Feynman rules for the vertices corresponding to the creation operators, both for the LSZ ones and for the new ones. With these I make explicit calculations to illustrate the problems with the LSZ operators and their solution with the new operators. Not only do these verify the existence of the extra particles created by the LSZ operators and indicate a physical interpretation, but they also show that the extra components are so large that their contribution to the norm of the state is ultra-violet divergent in renormalizable theories. Finally, I discuss the relation of this work to the work of Haag and Ruelle on scattering theory. I. INTRODUCTION to infinity does not help. This will be illustrated in Sec. IX C with the aid of explicit perturbative calculations. The reduction formula of Lehmann, Symanzik and Moreover, we will see that, the extra contributions are Zimmermann [1] (LSZ)1 is very important for applica- not merely nonzero, but in a renormalizable QFT are tions of quantum field theory (QFT) to experiment be- also generically ultra-violet (UV) divergent, as measured cause it shows how to compute S-matrix elements from by the norm of the state that is created. time-ordered Green functions, including the correct ex- In the restricted context of the matrix elements used to ternal line factors. obtain the S-matrix, a careful application of the infinite- Unfortunately, there are some problems, as was real- time limits, as in the LSZ paper, does remove the extra ized a long time ago | see the papers by Haag [4, 5], Ru- contributions. This can be characterized [4, 6] by saying elle [6], and Hepp [7]. The problems do not in fact impact that the limits used by LSZ are weak limits, but not the validity of the reduction formula itself, or even the strong limits. (See App. A for characterization of these validity of LSZ's proof. Instead, the problems manifest concepts, together with summaries of methods by which themselves when one tries extending the LSZ methods to it can be determined which kind of limit is applicable in more general situations. As we will see, such cases oc- particular cases.) y cur quite dramatically when the operators used by LSZ In contrast, for an operator Af (t; ∆t) that actually to create asymptotic particles are applied in experimen- does asymptotically create a single particle only, then tally relevant situations at finite times instead of infinite the strong limit exists. As indicated by the notation, it will be useful to introduce an extra parameter ∆t that arXiv:1904.10923v1 [hep-ph] 24 Apr 2019 times. More explicitly, suppose we are given a single-particle is a range of time involved in defining the operator; its positive-energy wave function2 f(x). Then LSZ define a inverse is essentially an uncertainty in energy. The oper- y ator creates a single particle in the limit3 ∆t . Its time-dependent operator af (t) that is intended to create ! 1 a single particle in the in-state or the out-state in the limit that t or t + , with the particle's state ! −∞ ! 1 3 y corresponding to the wave function f. However, when At finite times Af (t; ∆t) does create extra contributions in ad- one of these operators acts on the vacuum, what is cre- dition to the intended single particle. The extra contributions ated is a lot more than the intended particle; taking time vanish in the limit that ∆t ! 1. Therefore they are small if ∆t is large enough. The smallness of the extra contributions is what can allow the application to unstable particles, etc. Notice that to ensure that the operator creates one particle to a good ap- ∗ [email protected] proximation, it is ∆t that needs to be large, not t itself. That is 1 Other useful references for proofs following LSZ's strategy are in suitable for creating a particle in a chosen finite region of space- Refs. [2, 3] time. It might be within an experimental apparatus instead of 2 See Sec. VII for a specification of what is meant here. being infinitely far away. 2 application to creating particles in a scattering process One advantage of the new formulation is that once y involves taking both t and ∆t to infinity in such a way the new definition of Af (t; ∆t) has been provided, then that ∆t= t 0. the derivation of the S-matrix is essentially a straight- j j ! Such an operator allows one to make an adequate treat- forward calculation. The bulk of this paper primarily ment when the strict limits of infinite time are not taken. concerns motivation, examples, and derivations of the Such would be the case for treating long-lived but unsta- prerequisites for performing the calculations. As already ble particles or for a fully deductive treatment of neutrino mentioned, another advantage of the new methods are scattering and oscillations.4 The extra particles created that they allow straightforward extensions to situations by using the original LSZ operator instead of the new op- at non-asymptotic times, e.g., to treat unstable parti- erator would be detected in a suitably located detector. cles. Boyanovsky [12] has recently treated the space-time Textbook treatments given for these situations typ- properties of the decay of unstable particles, and encoun- ically start from the strict infinite-time formalism for tered complications that are closely related to the issues standard scattering. They then graft on something like treated here. In particular, he provides an independent a semiclassical analysis of isolated free particles, with a calculation of the ultra-violet divergence in the state cre- good dose of intuition and hand-waving.5 ated by an LSZ operator. The primary purpose of the paper is to provide an im- Another possible extension is to scattering with mass- proved proof that overcomes the problems just described. less particles. As is well-known, the postulates of stan- y In the LSZ paper, the creation operator af (t) involves dard scattering theory fail in theories with massless par- just an integral over all space, with the field (and its ticles. A fully systematic treatment requires extensions time derivative) being taken at one specific value of time or modifications to the versions of scattering theory that t. It is the use of integrals at fixed time that causes the are valid for massive particles. There is recent interest, problems, essentially by a kind of application of an uncer- e.g., [13, 14], in finding better treatments for the massless 7 tainty principle: A fixed time implies infinite uncertainty case. Off-shell or finite-time Green functions do exist in in energy. such theories. Therefore what is in question is the nature The main innovation applied in the present paper is of the infinite-time limits and their relation to physically y implementable scattering. A strategy for defining good to find a good way of defining the operator Af (t; ∆t), by y finite-time approximations to the creation of single par- averaging af (t) over a range of time. Many conceptual ticles could be very useful to finding a better formulation subtleties then robustly disappear. of the infinite-time limits with massless particles. The Related techniques were used by Haag and Ruelle in 6 formalism presented in this paper is suitable for use in their formulation of scattering theory [4, 6]. But their perturbative calculational examples that can be used to method was formulated somewhat differently, and in test the formulation of general abstract theorems. a way that calculations using their operators difficult. They focused heavily on mathematical aspects of the the- ory as opposed to possible applications. The different II. OVERALL VIEW: STARTING POINT, construction given in the present paper makes its much MOTIVATIONS, STRATEGY easier to treat the asymptotics and allows a simplification of the proof of the reduction formula. The new construc- A. Aims tion provides simple explicit formulas for the new opera- tors both in coordinate space and momentum space. See Sec. XIV for a comparison of the new method with the A primary technical aim is the determination of the S- matrix in a quantum field theory (QFT) from its Green Haag-Ruelle method.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Renormalization Scheme of Fermion Field in Standard Model
    A New Renormalization Scheme of Fermion Field in Standard Model Yong Zhoua a Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 2735, Beijing 100080, China (Jan 10, 2003) In order to obtain proper wave-function renormalization constants for unstable fermion and consist with Breit-Wigner formula in the resonant region, We have assumed an extension of the LSZ reduction formula for unstable fermion and adopted on-shell mass renormalization scheme in the framework of without field renormaization. The comparison of gauge dependence of physical amplitude between on-shell mass renormalization and complex-pole mass renormalization has been discussed. After obtaining the fermion wave-function renormalization constants, we extend them to two matrices in order to include the contributions of off-diagonal two-point diagrams at fermion external legs for the convenience of calculations of S-matrix elements. 11.10.Gh, 11.55.Ds, 12.15.Lk I. INTRODUCTION We are interested in the LSZ reduction formula [1] in the case of unstable particle, for the purpose of obtaining a proper wave function renormalization constant(wrc.) for unstable fermion. In this process we have demanded the form of the unstable particle’s propagator in the resonant region resembles the relativistic Breit-Wigner formula. Therefore the on-shell mass renormalization scheme is a suitable choice compared with the complex-pole mass renormalization scheme [2], as we will discuss in section 2. We also discard the field renormalization constants which have been proven at question in the case of having fermions mixing [3]. The layout of this article is as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory*
    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
    [Show full text]
  • Feynman Diagrams, Momentum Space Feynman Rules, Disconnected Diagrams, Higher Correlation Functions
    PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 Dr. Anosh Joseph, IISER Mohali LECTURE 05 Tuesday, January 14, 2020 Topics: Feynman Diagrams, Momentum Space Feynman Rules, Disconnected Diagrams, Higher Correlation Functions. Feynman Diagrams We can use the Wick’s theorem to express the n-point function h0jT fφ(x1)φ(x2) ··· φ(xn)gj0i as a sum of products of Feynman propagators. We will be interested in developing a diagrammatic interpretation of such expressions. Let us look at the expression containing four fields. We have h0jT fφ1φ2φ3φ4g j0i = DF (x1 − x2)DF (x3 − x4) +DF (x1 − x3)DF (x2 − x4) +DF (x1 − x4)DF (x2 − x3): (1) We can interpret Eq. (1) as the sum of three diagrams, if we represent each of the points, x1 through x4 by a dot, and each factor DF (x − y) by a line joining x to y. These diagrams are called Feynman diagrams. In Fig. 1 we provide the diagrammatic interpretation of Eq. (1). The interpretation of the diagrams is the following: particles are created at two spacetime points, each propagates to one of the other points, and then they are annihilated. This process can happen in three different ways, and they correspond to the three ways to connect the points in pairs, as shown in the three diagrams in Fig. 1. Thus the total amplitude for the process is the sum of these three diagrams. PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 ⟨0|T {ϕ1ϕ2ϕ3ϕ4}|0⟩ = DF(x1 − x2)DF(x3 − x4) + DF(x1 − x3)DF(x2 − x4) +DF(x1 − x4)DF(x2 − x3) 1 2 1 2 1 2 + + 3 4 3 4 3 4 Figure 1: Diagrammatic interpretation of Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Supersymmetry
    An Introduction to Supersymmetry Ulrich Theis Institute for Theoretical Physics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, D–07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] This is a write-up of a series of five introductory lectures on global supersymmetry in four dimensions given at the 13th “Saalburg” Summer School 2007 in Wolfersdorf, Germany. Contents 1 Why supersymmetry? 1 2 Weyl spinors in D=4 4 3 The supersymmetry algebra 6 4 Supersymmetry multiplets 6 5 Superspace and superfields 9 6 Superspace integration 11 7 Chiral superfields 13 8 Supersymmetric gauge theories 17 9 Supersymmetry breaking 22 10 Perturbative non-renormalization theorems 26 A Sigma matrices 29 1 Why supersymmetry? When the Large Hadron Collider at CERN takes up operations soon, its main objective, besides confirming the existence of the Higgs boson, will be to discover new physics beyond the standard model of the strong and electroweak interactions. It is widely believed that what will be found is a (at energies accessible to the LHC softly broken) supersymmetric extension of the standard model. What makes supersymmetry such an attractive feature that the majority of the theoretical physics community is convinced of its existence? 1 First of all, under plausible assumptions on the properties of relativistic quantum field theories, supersymmetry is the unique extension of the algebra of Poincar´eand internal symmtries of the S-matrix. If new physics is based on such an extension, it must be supersymmetric. Furthermore, the quantum properties of supersymmetric theories are much better under control than in non-supersymmetric ones, thanks to powerful non- renormalization theorems.
    [Show full text]
  • PHY 2404S Lecture Notes
    PHY 2404S Lecture Notes Michael Luke Winter, 2003 These notes are perpetually under construction. Please let me know of any typos or errors. Once again, large portions of these notes have been plagiarized from Sidney Coleman’s field theory lectures from Harvard, written up by Brian Hill. 1 Contents 1 Preliminaries 3 1.1 Counterterms and Divergences: A Simple Example . 3 1.2 CountertermsinScalarFieldTheory . 11 2 Reformulating Scattering Theory 18 2.1 Feynman Diagrams with External Lines off the Mass Shell . .. 18 2.1.1 AnswerOne: PartofaLargerDiagram . 19 2.1.2 Answer Two: The Fourier Transform of a Green Function 20 2.1.3 Answer Three: The VEV of a String of Heisenberg Fields 22 2.2 GreenFunctionsandFeynmanDiagrams. 23 2.3 TheLSZReductionFormula . 27 2.3.1 ProofoftheLSZReductionFormula . 29 3 Renormalizing Scalar Field Theory 36 3.1 The Two-Point Function: Wavefunction Renormalization .... 37 3.2 The Analytic Structure of G(2), and1PIGreenFunctions . 40 3.3 Calculation of Π(k2) to order g2 .................. 44 3.4 The definition of g .......................... 50 3.5 Unstable Particles and the Optical Theorem . 51 3.6 Renormalizability. 57 4 Renormalizability 60 4.1 DegreesofDivergence . 60 4.2 RenormalizationofQED. 65 4.2.1 TroubleswithVectorFields . 65 4.2.2 Counterterms......................... 66 2 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Counterterms and Divergences: A Simple Example In the last semester we considered a variety of field theories, and learned to calculate scattering amplitudes at leading order in perturbation theory. Unfor- tunately, although things were fine as far as we went, the whole basis of our scattering theory had a gaping hole in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions 4: Free Quantum Field Theory
    QFT PS4 Solutions: Free Quantum Field Theory (22/10/18) 1 Solutions 4: Free Quantum Field Theory 1. Heisenberg picture free real scalar field We have Z 3 d p 1 −i!pt+ip·x y i!pt−ip·x φ(t; x) = 3 p ape + ape (1) (2π) 2!p (i) By taking an explicit hermitian conjugation, we find our result that φy = φ. You need to note that all the parameters are real: t; x; p are obviously real by definition and if m2 is real and positive y y semi-definite then !p is real for all values of p. Also (^a ) =a ^ is needed. (ii) Since π = φ_ = @tφ classically, we try this on the operator (1) to find Z d3p r! π(t; x) = −i p a e−i!pt+ip·x − ay ei!pt−ip·x (2) (2π)3 2 p p (iii) In this question as in many others it is best to leave the expression in terms of commutators. That is exploit [A + B; C + D] = [A; C] + [A; D] + [B; C] + [B; D] (3) as much as possible. Note that here we do not have a sum over two terms A and B but a sum over an infinite number, an integral, but the principle is the same. −i!pt+ip·x −ipx The second way to simplify notation is to write e = e so that we choose p0 = +!p. −i!pt+ip·x ^y y −i!pt+ip·x The simplest way however is to write Abp =a ^pe and Ap =a ^pe .
    [Show full text]
  • A Supersymmetry Primer
    hep-ph/9709356 version 7, January 2016 A Supersymmetry Primer Stephen P. Martin Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb IL 60115 I provide a pedagogical introduction to supersymmetry. The level of discussion is aimed at readers who are familiar with the Standard Model and quantum field theory, but who have had little or no prior exposure to supersymmetry. Topics covered include: motiva- tions for supersymmetry, the construction of supersymmetric Lagrangians, superspace and superfields, soft supersymmetry-breaking interactions, the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), R-parity and its consequences, the origins of supersymmetry breaking, the mass spectrum of the MSSM, decays of supersymmetric particles, experi- mental signals for supersymmetry, and some extensions of the minimal framework. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Interlude: Notations and Conventions 13 3 Supersymmetric Lagrangians 17 3.1 The simplest supersymmetric model: a free chiral supermultiplet ............. 18 3.2 Interactions of chiral supermultiplets . ................ 22 3.3 Lagrangians for gauge supermultiplets . .............. 25 3.4 Supersymmetric gauge interactions . ............. 26 3.5 Summary: How to build a supersymmetricmodel . ............ 28 4 Superspace and superfields 30 4.1 Supercoordinates, general superfields, and superspace differentiation and integration . 31 4.2 Supersymmetry transformations the superspace way . ................ 33 4.3 Chiral covariant derivatives . ............ 35 4.4 Chiralsuperfields................................ ........ 37 arXiv:hep-ph/9709356v7 27 Jan 2016 4.5 Vectorsuperfields................................ ........ 38 4.6 How to make a Lagrangian in superspace . .......... 40 4.7 Superspace Lagrangians for chiral supermultiplets . ................... 41 4.8 Superspace Lagrangians for Abelian gauge theory . ................ 43 4.9 Superspace Lagrangians for general gauge theories . ................. 46 4.10 Non-renormalizable supersymmetric Lagrangians . .................. 49 4.11 R symmetries........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spin-1/2 Fermions in Quantum Field Theory
    Spin-1/2 fermions in quantum field theory µ First, recall that 4-vectors transform under Lorentz transformations, Λ ν, as p′ µ = Λµ pν, where Λ SO(3,1) satisfies Λµ g Λρ = g .∗ A Lorentz ν ∈ ν µρ λ νλ transformation corresponds to a rotation by θ about an axis nˆ [θ~ θnˆ] and ≡ a boost, ζ~ = vˆ tanh−1 ~v , where ~v is the corresponding velocity. Under the | | same Lorentz transformation, a generic field transforms as: ′ ′ Φ (x )= MR(Λ)Φ(x) , where M exp iθ~·J~ iζ~·K~ are N N representation matrices of R ≡ − − × 1 1 the Lorentz group. Defining J~+ (J~ + iK~ ) and J~− (J~ iK~ ), ≡ 2 ≡ 2 − i j ijk k i j [J± , J±]= iǫ J± , [J± , J∓] = 0 . Thus, the representations of the Lorentz algebra are characterized by (j1,j2), 1 1 where the ji are half-integers. (0, 0) is a scalar and (2, 2) is a four-vector. Of 1 1 interest to us here are the spinor representations (2, 0) and (0, 2). ∗ In our conventions, gµν = diag(1 , −1 , −1 , −1). (1, 0): M = exp i θ~·~σ 1ζ~·~σ , butalso (M −1)T = iσ2M(iσ2)−1 2 −2 − 2 (0, 1): [M −1]† = exp i θ~·~σ + 1ζ~·~σ , butalso M ∗ = iσ2[M −1]†(iσ2)−1 2 −2 2 since (iσ2)~σ(iσ2)−1 = ~σ∗ = ~σT − − Transformation laws of 2-component fields ′ β ξα = Mα ξβ , ′ α −1 T α β ξ = [(M ) ] β ξ , ′† α˙ −1 † α˙ † β˙ ξ = [(M ) ] β˙ ξ , ˙ ξ′† =[M ∗] βξ† .
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12 from Correlation Functions to Amplitudes
    Lecture 12 From Correlation Functions to Amplitudes Up to this point we have been able to compute correlation functions up to a given order in perturbation theory. Our next step is to relate these to amplitudes for physical processes that we can use to compute observables such as scattering cross sections and decay rates. For instance, assuming given initial and final states, we want to compute the amplitude to go from one to the other in the presence of interactions. In order to be able to define initial and final states we consider a situation where the interaction takes place at a localized region of spacetime and the initial state is defined at t ! −∞, whereas the final state is defined at t ! +1. These asymptotic states are well defined particle states. That is, if we have a two-particle state of momentum jp1p2i, this means that the wave- packets associated with each of the particles are strongly peaked at p1 and p2, and are well separated in momentum space. This assumption simplifies our treatment of asymptotic states. The same will be assumed of the final state jp3 : : : pni. We will initially assume these states far into the past and into the future are eigenstates of the free theory. The fact is they are not, even if they are not interacting say through scattering. The reason is that the presence of interactions modifies the parameters of the theory, so even the unperturbed propagation from the far past or to the far future is not described by free eigenstates. However, the results we will derive for free states will still hold with some modifications associated with the shift of the paramenters of the theory (including the fields) in the presence of interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Propagator
    Quantum Mechanics_propagator This article is about Quantum field theory. For plant propagation, see Plant propagation. In Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the diagram. They also can be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are therefore often called Green's functions. Non-relativistic propagators In non-relativistic quantum mechanics the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one spatial point at one time to another spatial point at a later time. It is the Green's function (fundamental solution) for the Schrödinger equation. This means that, if a system has Hamiltonian H, then the appropriate propagator is a function satisfying where Hx denotes the Hamiltonian written in terms of the x coordinates, δ(x)denotes the Dirac delta-function, Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function and K(x,t;x',t')is the kernel of the differential operator in question, often referred to as the propagator instead of G in this context, and henceforth in this article. This propagator can also be written as where Û(t,t' ) is the unitary time-evolution operator for the system taking states at time t to states at time t'. The quantum mechanical propagator may also be found by using a path integral, where the boundary conditions of the path integral include q(t)=x, q(t')=x' .
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory Koichi Hamaguchi Last Updated: July 31, 2017 Contents
    2017 S-semester Quantum Field Theory Koichi Hamaguchi Last updated: July 31, 2017 Contents x 0 Introduction 1 x 0.1 Course objectives . 2 x 0.2 Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory . 2 x 0.3 Notation and convention . 3 x 0.4 Various fields . 4 x 0.5 Outline: what we will learn . 4 x 0.6 S-matrix, amplitude M =) observables (σ and Γ) . 5 x 1 Scalar (spin 0) Field 16 x 1.1 Lorentz transformation . 16 x 1.1.1 Lorentz transformation of coordinates . 16 x 1.1.2 Lorentz transformation of quantum fields . 17 x 1.2 Lagrangian and Canonical Quantization of Real Scalar Field . 18 x 1.3 Equation of Motion (EOM) . 22 x 1.4 Free scalar field . 23 x 1.4.1 Solution of the EOM . 23 x 1.4.2 Commutation relations . 25 x 1.4.3 ay and a are the creation and annihilation operators. 25 x 1.4.4 Consistency check . 29 x 1.4.5 vacuum state . 30 x 1.4.6 One-particle state . 30 x 1.4.7 Lorentz transformation of a and ay ................... 31 x 1.4.8 [ϕ(x); ϕ(y)] for x0 =6 y0 .......................... 32 x 1.5 Interacting Scalar Field . 34 x 1.5.1 What is ϕ(x)?............................... 34 x 1.5.2 In/out states and the LSZ reduction formula . 36 x 1.5.3 Heisenberg field and Interaction picture field . 42 x 1.5.4 a and ay (again) . 45 x 1.5.5 h0jT(ϕ(x1) ··· ϕ(xn)) j0i =? ......................
    [Show full text]