DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1404.4368V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 5 Sep 2014 Univ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1404.4368V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 5 Sep 2014 Univ Draft version September 8, 2014 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 FORMATION, TIDAL EVOLUTION AND HABITABILITY OF THE KEPLER-186 SYSTEM Emeline Bolmont1,2,*, Sean N. Raymond1,2, Philip von Paris3,+, Franck Selsis1,2, Franck Hersant1,2, Elisa V. Quintana4,5 and Thomas Barclay5,6 Draft version September 8, 2014 ABSTRACT The Kepler-186 system consists of five planets orbiting an early M dwarf. The planets have physical radii of 1.0{1.50 R⊕ and orbital periods of 4{130 days. The 1:1R⊕ Kepler-186f with a period of 130 days is of particular interest. Its insolation of roughly 0:32 S⊕ places it within the surface liquid water habitable zone (HZ). We present a multifaceted study of the Kepler-186 system, using two sets of parameters which are consistent with the data and also self-consistent. First, we show that the distribution of planet masses can be roughly reproduced if the planets were accreted from a high surface density disk presumably sculpted by an earlier phase of migration. However, our simulations predict the existence of one to two undetected planets between planets e and f. Next, we present a dynamical analysis of the system including the effect of tides. The timescale for tidal evolution is short enough that the four inner planets must have small obliquities and near-synchronous rotation rates. The tidal evolution of Kepler-186f is slow enough that its current spin state depends on a combination of its initial spin state, its dissipation rate, and the stellar age. Finally, we study the habitability of Kepler-186f with a one-dimensional climate model. The planet's surface temperature can be raised above 273 K with 0.5{5 bars of CO2, depending on the amount of N2 present. Kepler-186f represents a case study of an Earth-sized planet in the cooler regions of the HZ of a cool star. Subject headings: methods: numerical { planets and satellites: atmospheres { planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability { planets and satellites: formation { stars: indi- vidual (Kepler-186, KIC 8120608) 1. INTRODUCTION sustain surface liquid water (e.g., Wordsworth et al. The Kepler mission (Borucki et al. 2010) has made 2010). Kepler-186f receives a comparable or perhaps key discoveries on the road to finding Earth-like planets slightly higher stellar flux than GJ 581, placing it more (e.g., Batalha et al. 2011; Borucki et al. 2012; Fressin comfortably within the HZ. et al. 2012; Borucki et al. 2013). The recent detection of Here, we use the definition of the classical HZ (HZ, an Earth-sized planet in the HZ of an M star (i.e., the e.g., Dole 1964; Hart 1978; Kasting et al. 1993; Selsis Kepler-186 system, Quintana et al. 2014) brings us a step et al. 2007a; Kopparapu et al. 2013). Acknowledging the closer to finding a true Earth twin. fact that all terrestrial life needs liquid water, the HZ is The Kepler-186 planetary system hosts five known defined as the region around a star where a terrestrial planets including Kepler-186f, an Earth-sized planet in planet can host liquid water on the surface. The extent the HZ (Selsis et al. 2007a; Kopparapu et al. 2013). Fig- of this HZ naturally depends on the atmospheric con- ure 1 shows a comparison between the Kepler-186 sys- ditions (composition, pressure) as well as on the prop- tem, the solar system, and two other systems with poten- erties of the central star. Many more factors influence tially habitable planets: Kepler-62 (Borucki et al. 2013) the width of the HZ, such as the geological activity (e.g., and GJ 581 (Udry et al. 2007; Mayor et al. 2009). Cli- Lammer et al. 2010), the biosphere itself (e.g., Grenfell mate models have shown that GJ 581d, a super-Earth et al. 2010), or the dynamical environment of the plan- near the outer edge of the HZ of its host M star, could etary system (e.g., Menou & Tabachnik 2003; Barnes & Raymond 2004; Jones et al. 2006; S´andoret al. 2007; 1 arXiv:1404.4368v2 [astro-ph.EP] 5 Sep 2014 Univ. Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, Kopparapu & Barnes 2010). UMR 5804, F-33270 Floirac, France 2 CNRS, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, UMR We present a three-pronged study of the Kepler-186 5804, F-33270 Floirac, France system. We first try to reproduce the orbital architecture 3 Institut f¨ur Planetenforschung, Deutsches Zentrum f¨ur of the system using simple accretion simulations (Section Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Rutherfordstr. 2, D-12489 Berlin, Germany 3). We show that certain features of the system{such as 4 SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Ave, Suite 100, Mountain the large gap between planets e and f{are hard to ex- View, CA 94043, USA plain. We next briefly discuss the long-term dynamical 5 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, stability of the system (Section 4). In Section 5, we study USA 6 Bay Area Environmental Research Institute/NASA Ames the long-term dynamical, tidal, and spin evolution of the Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA system. We use both simple tidal models and N-body + Current address: Univ. Bordeaux, Laboratoire simulations which include both tides and general relativ- d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, UMR 5804, F-33270 Floirac, France and CNRS, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, ity. Next, we study the atmospheric conditions needed UMR 5804, F-33270 Floirac, France to bring Kepler-186f's surface temperature into the liq- * Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed. uid water range (Section 6). We discuss our findings and email: [email protected] conclude in Section 7. 2 Bolmont et al. Astronomical Units (AU) forming MCMC realizations. The stellar properties -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 of this set correspond to those of table S1 in Quin- Orbits of tana et al. (2014). Kepler-186’s planets Set A and B are both valid sets of parameters, meaning that they are consistent with the data and are also self- consistent. c Line of sight The stellar mass is 0:5359 M in set A and 0:478 M to Earth in set B (Table 1 and Quintana et al. 2014). This pro- b f duces different values for the planets' semi-major axes d and insolations (Table 2). The same is true for their e planetary radii, as these are derived from the detected transit depth and the stellar radius. The fact that there is such a difference between the parameters values of each Habitable Zone set illustrate the limited knowledge we have of the sys- Potentially habitable tem. We expect the real parameters of the system to planets be within the range of sets A and B, so we performed Planetary system Too hot for life dynamical simulations for both these sets. However, av- comparison eraging between set A and B is not an option in so far Solar System as it would not correspond to anything realistic, the self- consistency would be lost (as in Quintana et al. 2014). Kepler-62 That is why we chose a different approach than in Quin- tana et al. (2014) where semi-major axes are not chosen Kepler-186 to match the derived stellar properties, but are rather determined by the transit model only. All five planets in the Kepler-186 system have radii GJ 581 between 1.0 and 1.5 R⊕ for both parameter sets. Given that low-density, gas-dominated planets tend to be larger than 1:5{2R⊕ (Weiss et al. 2013a; Weiss & Marcy 2014; 100 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.25 Lopez & Fortney 2013; Jontof-Hutter et al. 2014; Marcy Incident flux (normalized to Earth) et al. 2014b,a), all five Kepler-186 planets are probably Fig. 1.| Orbital configuration of the Kepler-186 system. The top rocky or at least solid. The planets' masses have not part shows a top-down view of the system, assuming orbits from been constrained with radial velocity or transit timing set A. The habitable zone boundaries are from Kopparapu et al. measurements (Quintana et al. 2014). Table 3 shows the (2013): the inner boundaries are the moist/runaway greenhouse limits and the outer boundaries are the maximum greenhouse and range of plausible planetary masses assuming a range early Mars limits. The sizes of the symbols are not to scale with the of compositions: 100% ice, 50% ice/ 50% rock, Earth- planetary orbits. The bottom part of the plot shows a comparison like composition, and 100% iron (following Fortney et al. between four different planetary systems which contain planets in 2007). the HZ: the solar system, Kepler-62 (Borucki et al. 2013), Kepler- 186 (Quintana et al. 2014), and GJ 581 (Udry et al. 2007; Mayor 3. FORMATION et al. 2009). Note that the inner moist and runaway greenhouse limits of the habitable zone are the same for Kepler-62, Kepler- 3.1. Formation Models 186, and GJ 581. Given the consistent insolation scaling, the x axis is linear in orbital distance but the scale is different for each At least six candidate mechanisms have been proposed system. The planets' relative sizes are correct, although for GJ 581 to explain the origin of close-in low-mass planets (Ray- the planetary radii were calculated as R = [Msin(i)]2:06, following mond et al. 2008a, 2013). In theory, these mechanisms Lissauer et al. (2011). can be distinguished using two observable quantities: 2. MODEL INPUT PARAMETER the inner planetary system architecture and the mean The stellar properties and planetary parameter given planet density.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Kepler Systems to Constrain the Frequency and Severity of Dynamical Effects on Habitable Planets Alexander James Mustill Melvyn B
    Using Kepler systems to constrain the frequency and severity of dynamical effects on habitable planets Alexander James Mustill Melvyn B. Davies Anders Johansen Dynamical instability bad for habitability • Excitation of eccentricity can shift HZ or cause extreme seasons (Spiegel+10, Dressing+10) • Planets may be scattered out of HZ • Planet-planet collisions may remove biospheres, atmospheres, water • Earth-like planets may be eaten by Neptunes/Jupiters Strong dynamical effects: scattering and Kozai • Scattering: closely-spaced giant planets excite each others’ eccentricities (Chatterjee+08) • Kozai: inclined external perturber (e.g. binary) can cause very large eccentricity fluctuations (Kozai 62, Lidov 62, Naoz 16) Relevance of inner systems to HZ • If you can • form a hot Jupiter through high-eccentricity migration • damage a Kepler system at few tenths of an au • you will damage the habitable zone too Relevance of inner systems intrinsically • Large number of single-candidate systems found by Kepler relative to multiples • Is this left over from formation? Or do the multiples evolve into singles through dynamics? (Johansen+12) • Informs models of planet formation • all the Kepler systems are interestingly different to the Solar system, but do we have two interestingly different channels of planet formation or only one? What do we know about the prevalence of strong dynamical effects? • So far know little about planets in HZ • What we do know: • Violent dynamical history strong contender for hot Jupiter migration • Many giants have high
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of the Terrestrial Planets from a Large Number of N-Body Simulations ∗ Rebecca A
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 392 (2014) 28–38 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Dynamics of the terrestrial planets from a large number of N-body simulations ∗ Rebecca A. Fischer , Fred J. Ciesla Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA article info abstract Article history: The agglomeration of planetary embryos and planetesimals was the final stage of terrestrial planet Received 6 September 2013 formation. This process is modeled using N-body accretion simulations, whose outcomes are tested by Received in revised form 26 January 2014 comparing to observed physical and chemical Solar System properties. The outcomes of these simulations Accepted 3 February 2014 are stochastic, leading to a wide range of results, which makes it difficult at times to identify the full Availableonline25February2014 range of possible outcomes for a given dynamic environment. We ran fifty high-resolution simulations Editor: T. Elliott each with Jupiter and Saturn on circular or eccentric orbits, whereas most previous studies ran an Keywords: order of magnitude fewer. This allows us to better quantify the probabilities of matching various accretion observables, including low probability events such as Mars formation, and to search for correlations N-body simulations between properties. We produce many good Earth analogues, which provide information about the mass terrestrial planets evolution and provenance of the building blocks of the Earth. Most observables are weakly correlated Mars or uncorrelated, implying that individual evolutionary stages may reflect how the system evolved even late veneer if models do not reproduce all of the Solar System’s properties at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • JUICE Red Book
    ESA/SRE(2014)1 September 2014 JUICE JUpiter ICy moons Explorer Exploring the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Definition Study Report European Space Agency 1 This page left intentionally blank 2 Mission Description Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer Key science goals The emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Characterise Ganymede, Europa and Callisto as planetary objects and potential habitats Explore the Jupiter system as an archetype for gas giants Payload Ten instruments Laser Altimeter Radio Science Experiment Ice Penetrating Radar Visible-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Imaging System Magnetometer Particle Package Submillimetre Wave Instrument Radio and Plasma Wave Instrument Overall mission profile 06/2022 - Launch by Ariane-5 ECA + EVEE Cruise 01/2030 - Jupiter orbit insertion Jupiter tour Transfer to Callisto (11 months) Europa phase: 2 Europa and 3 Callisto flybys (1 month) Jupiter High Latitude Phase: 9 Callisto flybys (9 months) Transfer to Ganymede (11 months) 09/2032 – Ganymede orbit insertion Ganymede tour Elliptical and high altitude circular phases (5 months) Low altitude (500 km) circular orbit (4 months) 06/2033 – End of nominal mission Spacecraft 3-axis stabilised Power: solar panels: ~900 W HGA: ~3 m, body fixed X and Ka bands Downlink ≥ 1.4 Gbit/day High Δv capability (2700 m/s) Radiation tolerance: 50 krad at equipment level Dry mass: ~1800 kg Ground TM stations ESTRAC network Key mission drivers Radiation tolerance and technology Power budget and solar arrays challenges Mass budget Responsibilities ESA: manufacturing, launch, operations of the spacecraft and data archiving PI Teams: science payload provision, operations, and data analysis 3 Foreword The JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer) mission, selected by ESA in May 2012 to be the first large mission within the Cosmic Vision Program 2015–2025, will provide the most comprehensive exploration to date of the Jovian system in all its complexity, with particular emphasis on Ganymede as a planetary body and potential habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Accretion of the Terrestrial Planets
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI 1546.pdf COMPOSITION AND ACCRETION OF THE TERRESTRIAL PLANETS. Edward R. D. Scott and G. Jeffrey Taylor, Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, Univer- sity of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Compositional variations among the spread gravitational mixing of the embryos and their four terrestrial planets are generally attributed to giant 20 impacts [1] rather than to primordial chemical varia- Fig. 2 tions among planetesimals [e.g., 2]. This is largely be- Mars cause modeling suggests that each terrestrial planet ac- 15 creted material from the whole of the inner solar sys- tem [1], and because Mercury’s high density is attrib- 10 Venus Earth uted to mantle stripping in a giant impact [3] and not to its position as the innermost planet [4]. However, Mer- Mercury cury’s high concentration of metallic iron and low con- 5 centration of oxidized iron are comparable to those in recently discovered metal-rich chondrites [5-7]. Since E 0 chondrites are linked isotopically with the Earth, we 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 suggest that Mercury may have formed from metal-rich chondritic material. Venus and Earth have similar con- Semi-major Axis (AU) centrations of metallic and oxidized iron that are inter- fragments, which ensured that each terrestrial planet mediate between those of Mercury and Mars consistent formed from material originally located throughout the with wide, overlapping accretion zones [1]. However, inner solar system (0.5 to 2.5 AU).
    [Show full text]
  • POSSIBLE STRUCTURE MODELS for the TRANSITING SUPER-EARTHS:KEPLER-10B and 11B
    43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2012) 1290.pdf POSSIBLE STRUCTURE MODELS FOR THE TRANSITING SUPER-EARTHS:KEPLER-10b AND 11b. P. Futó1 1 Department of Physical Geography, University of West Hungary, Szombathely, Károlyi Gáspár tér, H- 9700, Hungary ([email protected]) Introduction:Up to january of 2012,10 super- The planet Kepler-11b has a large radius (1.97 R⊕) for Earths have been announced by Kepler-mission [1] its mass (4.3 M⊕),therefore this planet must have a that is designed to detect hundreds of transiting exo- spherical shell that is composed of low-density materi- planets.Kepler was launched on 6th March,2009 and the als.Considering the planet's average density,it must primary purpose of its scientific program is to search have a metallic core with different possible fractional for terrestrial-sized planets in the habitable zone of mass.Accordinghly,I have made a possible structure Solar-like stars.For the case of high number of discov- model for Kepler-11b in which the selected core mass eries we will be able to estimate the frequency of fraction is 32.59% (similarly to that of Earth) and the Earth-sized planets in our galaxy.Results of the Kepler- water ice layer has a relatively great fractional 's measurements show that the small-sized planets are volume.For case of the selected composition, the icy frequent in the spiral galaxies.A catalog of planetary surface sublimated to form a water vapor as the planet candidates,including objects with small-sized candidate moved inward the central star during its migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Mars Is the Fourth Terrestrial Planet. It Is Smaller in Size Than
    Mars Mars is the fourth terrestrial planet. It is smaller in size than Earth and Venus, but larger than Mercury. Of the planets, Mars is the most hospitable to visiting humans, as it has an atmosphere, though it has no oxygen and is very thin. In the early days of the solar system, Mars has had liquid water on its surface, which is proved by the existence of various minerals that require liquid water to form. The current atmosphere of Mars is too thin and cold for liquid water to exist for long periods of times. Still, there is evidence of terrain shaped by flowing liquids, which are probably temporary flows or floods caused by the melting of ice in the ground. Mars has seasons like the Earth, and ice caps at the poles that grow and shrink over the course of the year. They consist of water ice and CO2 ice, the latter varying more with the seasons. One year on Mars is a bit less than two Earth years. Mars has two moons, Phobos and Deimos. They are very small compared to Mars, and are likely to be asteroids captured by Mars's gravity in the distant past. Giant planets and their moons The outer four planets of the solar system are known as the giant planets, because of their large size (compared to the terrestrial planets). The giant planets of our solar system can be further divided into two categories: gas giants (Jupiter and Saturn) and ice giants (Uranus and Neptune). The gas giants consist mainly of hydrogen (up to 90%) and helium, while the ice giants are mostly "ices" such as water and ammonia, with only some 20% of hydrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Science
    Scientific Research National Aeronautics and Space Administration Planetary Science MSFC planetary scientists are active in Peering into the history The centerpiece of the Marshall efforts is research at Marshall, building on a long history of the solar system the Marshall Noble Gas Research Laboratory of scientific support to NASA’s human explo- (MNGRL), a unique facility within NASA. Noble- ration program planning, whether focused Marshall planetary scientists use multiple anal- gas isotopes are a well-established technique on the Moon, asteroids, or Mars. Research ysis techniques to understand the formation, for providing detailed temperature-time histories areas of expertise include planetary sample modification, and age of planetary materials of rocks and meteorites. The MNGRL lab uses analysis, planetary interior modeling, and to learn about their parent planets. Sample Ar-Ar and I-Xe radioactive dating to find the planetary atmosphere observations. Scientists analysis of this type is well-aligned with the formation age of rocks and meteorites, and at Marshall are involved in several ongoing priorities for scientific research and analysis Ar/Kr/Ne cosmic-ray exposure ages to under- planetary science missions, including the Mars in NASA’s Planetary Science Division. Multiple stand when the meteorites were launched from Exploration Rovers, the Cassini mission to future missions are poised to provide new their parent planets. Saturn, and the Gravity Recovery and Interior sample-analysis opportunities. Laboratory (GRAIL) mission to the Moon. Marshall is the center for program manage- ment for the Agency’s Discovery and New Frontiers programs, providing programmatic oversight into a variety of missions to various planetary science destinations throughout the solar system, from MESSENGER’s investiga- tions of Mercury to New Frontiers’ forthcoming examination of the Pluto system.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Use of Planetary Science Data for Studying Extrasolar Planets a Science Frontier White Paper Submitted to the Astronomy & Astrophysics 2020 Decadal Survey
    On the Use of Planetary Science Data for Studying Extrasolar Planets A science frontier white paper submitted to the Astronomy & Astrophysics 2020 Decadal Survey Thematic Area: Planetary Systems Principal Author Daniel J. Crichton Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology [email protected] 818-354-9155 Co-Authors: J. Steve Hughes, Gael Roudier, Robert West, Jeffrey Jewell, Geoffrey Bryden, Mark Swain, T. Joseph W. Lazio (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology) There is an opportunity to advance both solar system and extrasolar planetary studies that does not require the construction of new telescopes or new missions but better use and access to inter-disciplinary data sets. This approach leverages significant investment from NASA and international space agencies in exploring this solar system and using those discoveries as “ground truth” for the study of extrasolar planets. This white paper illustrates the potential, using phase curves and atmospheric modeling as specific examples. A key advance required to realize this potential is to enable seamless discovery and access within and between planetary science and astronomical data sets. Further, seamless data discovery and access also expands the availability of science, allowing researchers and students at a variety of institutions, equipped only with Internet access and a decent computer to conduct cutting-edge research. © 2019 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-decisional - For planning
    [Show full text]
  • PDF— Granite-Greenstone Belts Separated by Porcupine-Destor
    C G E S NT N A ER S e B EC w o TIO ok N Vol. 8, No. 10 October 1998 es st t or INSIDE Rel e • 1999 Section Meetings ea GSA TODAY Rocky Mountain, p. 25 ses North-Central, p. 27 A Publication of the Geological Society of America • Honorary Fellows, p. 8 Lithoprobe Leads to New Perspectives on 70˚ -140˚ 70˚ Continental Evolution -40˚ Ron M. Clowes, Lithoprobe, University -120˚ of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, -60˚ -100˚ -80˚ Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada, 60˚ Wopmay 60˚ [email protected] Slave SNORCLE Fred A. Cook, Department of Geology & Thelon Rae Geophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Nain Province AB T2N 1N4, Canada 50˚ ECSOOT John N. Ludden, Centre de Recherches Hearne Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, Taltson Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, Cedex, France AB Trans-Hudson Orogen SC THOT LE WS Superior Province ABSTRACT Cordillera AG Lithoprobe, Canada’s national earth KSZ o MRS 40 40 science research project, was established o Grenville Province in 1984 to develop a comprehensive Wyoming Penokean GL -60˚ understanding of the evolution of the -120˚ Yavapai Province Orogen Appalachians northern North American continent. With rocks representing 4 b.y. of Earth -100˚ -80˚ history, the Canadian landmass and off- Phanerozoic Proterozoic Archean shore margins provide an exceptional 200 Ma - present 1100 Ma 3200 - 2650 Ma opportunity to gain new perspectives on continental evolution. Lithoprobe’s 470 - 275 Ma 1300 - 1000 Ma 3400 - 2600 Ma 10 study areas span the country and 1800 - 1600 Ma 3800 - 2800 Ma geological time. A pan-Lithoprobe syn- 1900 - 1800 Ma 4000 - 2500 Ma thesis will bring the project to a formal conclusion in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • WATER – Overview
    WATER – Overview Contents Introduction ............................1 Module Matrix ........................2 FOSS Conceptual Framework...4 Background for the Conceptual Framework in Water ................6 FOSS Components ................ 16 FOSS Instructional Design ..... 18 FOSSweb and Technology ...... 26 Universal Design for Learning ................................ 30 Working in Collaborative INTRODUCTION Groups .................................. 32 Safety in the Classroom Water is the most important substance on Earth. Water dominates and Outdoors ........................ 34 the surface of our planet, changes the face of the land, and defi nes life. These powerful pervasive ideas are introduced here. The Scheduling the Module .......... 35 Water Module provides students with experiences to explore the FOSS K–8 Scope properties of water, changes in water, interactions between water and Sequence ....................... 36 and other earth materials, and how humans use water as a natural resource. In this module, students will • Conduct surface-tension experiments. • Observe and explain the interaction between masses of water at diff erent temperatures and masses of water in liquid and solid states. • Construct a thermometer to observe that water expands as it warms and contracts as it cools. • Investigate the eff ect of surface area and air temperature on evaporation, and the eff ect of temperature on condensation. • Investigate what happens when water is poured through two earth materials—soil and gravel. • Design and construct a waterwheel and use it to lift or pull objects. • Use fi eld techniques to compare how well several soils drain. © Copyright The Regents of the University California. Not for resale, redistribution, or use other than classroom without further permission. www.fossweb.com Full Option Science System 1 WATER – Overview Module Summary Focus Questions Students investigate properties of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminsterresearch the Astrobiology Primer V2.0 Domagal-Goldman, S.D., Wright, K.E., Adamala, K., De La Rubia Leigh, A., Bond
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 Domagal-Goldman, S.D., Wright, K.E., Adamala, K., de la Rubia Leigh, A., Bond, J., Dartnell, L., Goldman, A.D., Lynch, K., Naud, M.-E., Paulino-Lima, I.G., Kelsi, S., Walter-Antonio, M., Abrevaya, X.C., Anderson, R., Arney, G., Atri, D., Azúa-Bustos, A., Bowman, J.S., Brazelton, W.J., Brennecka, G.A., Carns, R., Chopra, A., Colangelo-Lillis, J., Crockett, C.J., DeMarines, J., Frank, E.A., Frantz, C., de la Fuente, E., Galante, D., Glass, J., Gleeson, D., Glein, C.R., Goldblatt, C., Horak, R., Horodyskyj, L., Kaçar, B., Kereszturi, A., Knowles, E., Mayeur, P., McGlynn, S., Miguel, Y., Montgomery, M., Neish, C., Noack, L., Rugheimer, S., Stüeken, E.E., Tamez-Hidalgo, P., Walker, S.I. and Wong, T. This is a copy of the final version of an article published in Astrobiology. August 2016, 16(8): 561-653. doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460. It is available from the publisher at: https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2015.1460 © Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman and Katherine E. Wright, et al., 2016; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Smadar Naoz September 2021 Contact University of California Los Angeles, Information Department of Physics & Astronomy 30 Portola Plaza, Box 951547 E-mail: [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90095 WWW: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/∼snaoz/ Research Dynamics of planetary, stellar and black hole systems, which include formation of Hot Jupiters, Interests globular clusters, spiral structure, compact objects etc. Cosmology, structure formation in the early Universe, reionization and 21cm fluctuations. Education Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Ph.D. in Physics, January 2010 Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel M.S. in Physics, Magna Cum Laude, 2004 B.S. in Physics 2002 Positions University of California, Los Angeles Associate professor since July 2019 Howard & Astrid Preston Term Chair in Astrophysics since July 2018 Assistant professor 2014-2019 Harvard Smithsonian CfA, Institute for Theory and Computation Einstein Fellow, September 2012 { June 2014 ITC Fellow, September 2011 { August 2012 Northwestern University, CIERA Gruber Fellow, September 2010 { August 2011 Postdoctoral associate in theoretical astrophysics, January 2010 { August 2010 Scholarships Helen B. Warner Prize, awarded by the American Astronomical Society, 2020 Honors and Scialog fellow, and accepted proposal, Signatures of Life in the Universe, 2020/2021 (conference Awards postponed to 2021 due to COVID-19) Career Commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Award, given by UCLA Academic Senate 2019. For other diversity awards, see xDEI. Hellman Fellows Award, awarded by Hellman Fellows Program, aimed to support the research of promising Assistant Professors who show capacity for great distinction in their research, June 2017 Multiple departmental teaching awards 2015-2019, see xTeaching, for details Sloan Research Fellowships awarded by the Alfred P.
    [Show full text]