DOCSLIB.ORG

Rationality: from Ignoramus to Rationalist 2Nd Edition December 6, 2020 West Lafayette, Indiana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rationality: from Ignoramus to Rationalist 2Nd Edition December 6, 2020 West Lafayette, Indiana Rationality From Ignoramus To Rationalist Alan Bunning Rationality: From Ignoramus to Rationalist 2nd edition December 6, 2020 West Lafayette, Indiana Copyright © 2020 by Alan Bunning. Verbatim copying and distribution of this book in its entirety is permitted for free non-commercial use provided that this notice is included. This book is available in both online and printed versions. The online version includes embedded hypertext links, searchable text, and can be downloaded from the Internet for free. The printed version is merely provided as a convenience at the publishers cost and the author does not make any profit from any printed or e- book formats that may be offered for sale. Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 i.1 Principles of Rationality ............................................................................... 2 i.1.1 No Religion Allowed ............................................................................. 2 i.1.2 Evidenced Based Reasoning .................................................................. 4 i.1.3 Intellectual Consistency ......................................................................... 5 i.1.4 Objectivity ............................................................................................. 7 i.1.5 Seekers of Truth .................................................................................... 7 i.2 Advancement to Rationalist .......................................................................... 9 Chapter 1: From Ignoramus to Atheist ........................................... 13 1.1 Philosophical Nonsense ............................................................................. 14 1.1.1 Relativism ........................................................................................... 15 1.1.2 Pluralism ............................................................................................. 16 1.1.3 Tolerance ............................................................................................ 16 1.2 Unobtainable Proof .................................................................................... 17 1.3 Advancement to Atheist ............................................................................. 18 Chapter 2: From Atheist To Agnostic .............................................. 21 2.1 The Burden of Proof .................................................................................. 21 2.2 Sociological Perspective ............................................................................ 22 2.2.1 The New Ontological Argument ......................................................... 23 2.3 Irrational Atheists....................................................................................... 25 2.3.1 Religious Atheists ............................................................................... 26 2.3.2 Alogical Philosophy ........................................................................... 28 2.4 Atheist Pretenders ...................................................................................... 29 2.5 Amoral Lifestyle ........................................................................................ 30 2.5.1 The Fruit of Atheism .......................................................................... 31 2.5.2 Judeo-Christian Atheists ..................................................................... 33 2.6 Advancement to Agnostic .......................................................................... 34 Chapter 3: From Agnostic To Supernaturalist ............................... 39 3.1 Religious Agnostics ................................................................................... 39 3.2 Pascal’s Wager ........................................................................................... 40 3.3 Characteristics of Miracles......................................................................... 42 3.3.1 Statistical Coincidences ...................................................................... 42 3.3.2 God of the Gaps .................................................................................. 43 3.3.3 Unexplainable Phenomena ................................................................. 44 3.3.4 Reliability of Witnesses ...................................................................... 45 3.3.5 Scientific Validation ........................................................................... 46 3.4 Scientific Evidence of the Supernatural ..................................................... 47 3.4.1 Life after Death ................................................................................... 48 3.4.2 Kirlian Photography ........................................................................... 50 3.4.3 Fasting Without Water ........................................................................ 52 3.4.4 Prayer .................................................................................................. 53 3.5 The Skeptic’s Response .............................................................................. 55 3.5.1 Cry Baby Excuses ............................................................................... 56 3.5.2 Scientific Voodoo ............................................................................... 58 3.6 Advancement to Supernaturalist ................................................................. 59 Chapter 4: From Supernaturalist to Theist...................................... 65 4.1 The Cosmological Argument ..................................................................... 65 4.1.1 The Big Bang Theory .......................................................................... 66 4.1.2 The Creation of Atoms ........................................................................ 68 4.2 The Law of Biogenesis ............................................................................... 68 4.2.1 Spontaneous Generation ..................................................................... 69 4.2.2 Panspermia/Transpermia ..................................................................... 71 4.2.3 Life is Supernatural ............................................................................. 71 4.3 The Teleological Argument ........................................................................ 73 4.3.1 Intelligent Design Theory ................................................................... 74 4.3.2 Examples of Design ............................................................................ 75 4.3.3 Directed Panspermia ........................................................................... 76 4.3.4 Superior Intelligence ........................................................................... 77 4.4 The Moral Argument .................................................................................. 78 4.5 The Scientific God ...................................................................................... 79 4.6 Advancement to Theist ............................................................................... 80 Chapter 5: From Theist To Abrahamist ........................................... 83 5.1 Theological Significance ............................................................................ 83 5.1.1 Is God Knowable? ............................................................................... 84 5.1.2 Is God Credible? ................................................................................. 85 5.1.3 Is God Relevant? ................................................................................. 87 5.2 Comparative Religion ................................................................................. 88 5.2.1 Subjective Marketing Techniques ....................................................... 89 5.2.2 Establishing Religious Claims ............................................................ 91 5.2.3 Contradictory Claims .......................................................................... 91 5.2.4 Objective Evaluation Criteria .............................................................. 92 5.2.5 Analysis Summary .............................................................................. 94 5.3 The Abrahamic God ................................................................................... 97 5.3.1 Ancient Origins ................................................................................... 97 5.3.2 Source Reliability ................................................................................ 99 5.3.3 Internal Consistency .......................................................................... 100 5.3.4 External Consistency ......................................................................... 101 5.3.5 Supernatural Knowledge ................................................................... 106 5.4 Advancement to Abrahamist .................................................................... 110 Chapter 6: From Abrahamist To “Christian” ............................... 115 6.1 Valid Scripture ......................................................................................... 115 6.1.1 Formation of the Old Testament ....................................................... 116 6.1.2 Formation of the New Testament ...................................................... 117 6.1.3 Additional Books .............................................................................. 118 6.2 Invalid Scripture ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liar, Lunatic, and Lord Compiled from Mere Christianity by C.S Lewis
    WHO DO YOU SAY THAT I AM? C.S. Lewis' Lord, Liar, or Lunatic? ––compiled from Mere Christianity C.S. Lewis said this: “Let us not say, ‘I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't accept his claim to be God.’ That is one thing we must not say. "A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic--on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg-- or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great moral teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.” I. The Question: Who was (is) Jesus? The Main Argument: AThere are only 3 possible answers A Lord, or Liar, or Lunatic. The bottom line of the argument is this: Jesus was either a liar, a lunatic, or the Lord. He could not possibly be a liar or a lunatic. Therefore “Jesus is Lord.” II. Argument #1- The Dilemma: Lord or liar: Jesus was either God (if he did not lie about who he was) or a bad man (if he did).
    [Show full text]
  • The Political-Economy Trilemma
    DPRIETI Discussion Paper Series 20-E-018 The Political-Economy Trilemma AIZENMAN, Joshua University of Southern California and NBER ITO, Hiroyuki RIETI The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/ RIETI Discussion Paper Series 20-E-018 March 2020 The Political-Economy Trilemma1 Joshua Aizenman University of Southern California and NBER Hiro Ito Portland State University Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry Abstract This paper investigates the political-economy trilemma: policy makers face a trade-off of choosing two out of three policy goals or governance styles, namely, (hyper-)globalization, national sovereignty, and democracy. We develop a set of indexes that measure the extent of attainment of the three factors for 139 countries in the period of 1975-2016. Using these indexes, we examine the validity of the hypothesis of the political-economy trilemma by testing whether the three trilemma variables are linearly related. We find that, for industrialized countries, there is a linear relationship between globalization and national sovereignty (i.e., a dilemma), and that for developing countries, all three indexes are linearly correlated (i.e., a trilemma). We also investigate whether and how three political-economic factors affect the degree of political and financial stability. The results indicate that more democratic industrialized countries tend to experience more political instability, while developing countries tend to be able to stabilize their politics if they are more democratic. The lower level of national sovereignty an industrialized country attains, the more stable its political situation tends to be, while a higher level of sovereignty helps a developing country to stabilize its politics.
    [Show full text]
  • On Faith-Healing New Secular Humanist Centers?
    New Secular More on Humanist Faith-Healing Centers? James Randi Paul Kurtz Gerald Larue Vern Bullough Henry Gordon Bob Wisne David Alexander Faith-healer Robert Roberts Also: Is Goldilocks Dangerous? • Pornography • The Supreme Court • Southern Baptists • Protestantism, Catholicism, and Unbelief in France 1n Its Tree _I FALL 1986, VOL. 6, NO. 4 ISSN 0272-0701 Contents 3 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 17 BIBLICAL SCORECARD 62 CLASSIFIED 12 ON THE BARRICADES 60 IN THE NAME OF GOD 6 EDITORIALS Is Goldilocks Dangerous? Paul Kurtz / Pornography, Censorship, and Freedom, Paul Kurtz I Reagan's Judiciary, Ronald A. Lindsay / Is Secularism Neutral? Richard J. Burke / Southern Baptists Betray Heritage, Robert S. Alley / The Holy-Rolling of America, Frank Johnson 14 HUMANIST CENTERS New Secular Humanist Centers, Paul Kurtz / The Need for Friendship Centers, Vern L. Bullough / Toward New Humanist Organizations, Bob Wisne THE EVIDENCE AGAINST REINCARNATION 18 Are Past-Life Regressions Evidence for Reincarnation? Melvin Harris 24 The Case Against Reincarnation (Part 1) Paul Edwards BELIEF AND UNBELIEF WORLDWIDE 35 Protestantism, Catholicism, and Unbelief in Present-Day France Jean Boussinesq MORE ON FAITH-HEALING 46 CS ER's Investigation Gerald A. Larue 46 An Answer to Peter Popoff James Randi 48 Popoff's TV Empire Declines .. David Alexander 49 Richard Roberts's Healing Crusade Henry Gordon IS SECULAR HUMANISM A RELIGION? 52 A Response to My Critics Paul Beattie 53 Diminishing Returns Joseph Fletcher 54 On Definition-Mongering Paul Kurtz BOOKS 55 The Other World of Shirley MacLaine Ring Lardner, Jr. 57 Saintly Starvation Bonnie Bullough VIEWPOINTS 58 Papal Pronouncements Delos B. McKown 59 Yahweh: A Morally Retarded God William Harwood Editor: Paul Kurtz Associate Editors: Doris Doyle, Steven L.
    [Show full text]
  • New Measures of the Trilemma Hypothesis: Implications for Asia
    ADBI Working Paper Series New Measures of the Trilemma Hypothesis: Implications for Asia Hiro Ito and Masahiro Kawai No. 381 September 2012 Asian Development Bank Institute Hiro Ito is associate professor of economics at the Department of Economics, Portland State University. Masahiro Kawai is Dean and CEO, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. This is a revised version of the paper presented to the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) Annual Conference held in Tokyo on 2 December 2011. The authors thank Akira Kohsaka, Guonan Ma, and other conference participants as well as Giovanni Capannelli, Mario B. Lamberte, Eduardo Levy-Yeyati, Peter Morgan, Naoto Osawa, Gloria O. Pasadilla, Reza Siregar, and Willem Thorbecke for useful comments on earlier versions. Michael Cui, Jacinta Bernadette Rico, Erica Clower, and Shigeru Akiyama provided excellent research assistance. The first author thanks Portland State University for financial support and ADBI for its hospitality while he was visiting the institute. The authors accept responsibility for any remaining errors in the paper. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • God Among the Gods: an Analysis of the Function of Yahweh in the Divine Council of Deuteronomy 32 and Psalm 82
    LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY AND GRADUATE SCHOOL GOD AMONG THE GODS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTION OF YAHWEH IN THE DIVINE COUNCIL OF DEUTERONOMY 32 AND PSALM 82 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF RELIGION IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RELIGIOUS STUDIES BY DANIEL PORTER LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA MAY 2010 The views expressed in this thesis do not necessarily represent the views of the institution and/or of the thesis readers. Copyright © 2010 by Daniel Porter All Rights Reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my wife, Mariel And My Parents, The Rev. Fred A. Porter and Drenda Porter Special thanks to Dr. Ed Hindson and Dr. Al Fuhr for their direction and advice through the course of this project. iii ABSTRACT The importance of the Ugaritic texts discovered in 1929 to ancient Near Eastern and Biblical Studies is one of constant debate. The Ugaritic texts offer a window into the cosmology that shaped the ancient Near East and Semitic religions. One of the profound concepts is the idea of a divine council and its function in maintaining order in the cosmos. Over this council sits a high god identified as El in the Ugaritic texts whose divine function is to maintain order in the divine realm as well on earth. Due to Ugarit‟s involvement in the ancient world and the text‟s representation of Canaanite cosmology, scholars have argued that the Ugaritic pantheon is evidenced in the Hebrew Bible where Yahweh appears in conjunction with other divine beings. Drawing on imagery from both the Ugaritic and Hebrew texts, scholars argue that Yahweh was not originally the high god of Israel, and the idea of “Yahweh alone” was a progression throughout the biblical record.
    [Show full text]
  • Elohim and Jehovah in Mormonism and the Bible
    Elohim and Jehovah in Mormonism and the Bible Boyd Kirkland urrently, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints defines the CGodhead as consisting of three separate and distinct personages or Gods: Elohim, or God the Father; Jehovah, or Jesus Christ, the Son of God both in the spirit and in the flesh; and the Holy Ghost. The Father and the Son have physical, resurrected bodies of flesh and bone, but the Holy Ghost is a spirit personage. Jesus' title of Jehovah reflects his pre-existent role as God of the Old Testament. These definitions took official form in "The Father and the Son: A Doctrinal Exposition by the First Presidency and the Twelve" (1916) as the culmination of five major stages of theological development in Church history (Kirkland 1984): 1. Joseph Smith, Mormonism's founder, originally spoke and wrote about God in terms practically indistinguishable from then-current protestant the- ology. He used the roles, personalities, and titles of the Father and the Son interchangeably in a manner implying that he believed in only one God who manifested himself as three persons. The Book of Mormon, revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants prior to 1835, and Smith's 1832 account of his First Vision all reflect "trinitarian" perceptions. He did not use the title Elohim at all in this early stage and used Jehovah only rarely as the name of the "one" God. 2. The 1835 Lectures on Faith and Smith's official 1838 account of his First Vision both emphasized the complete separateness of the Father and the Son.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Analysis of Views on God's
    5th International Conference on Research in Behavioral and Social Science Spain | Barcelona | December 7-9, 2018 Beyond the Barriers of Nature: Critical analysis of views on God’s Existence in various religions R. Rafique, N. Abas Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Gujrat, Hafiz Hayat Campus, Gujrat Abstract: This article reports critical overview of views on existence of God and naturalism. Theists argue the existence of God, atheists insist nonexistence of God, while agnostics claim the existence of God is unknowable, and even if exists, it is neither possible to demonstrate His existence nor likely to refute this spiritual theology. The argument that the existence of God can be known to all, even before exposure to any divine revelation, predates before Islam, Christianity and even Judaism. Pharos deity claim shows that the concept of deity existed long before major religions. History shows the Greek philosophers also tried to explore God before, during and after the prophet’s revolution in Mesopotamia. Today presupposition apologetical doctrine (Abram Kuyper) ponders and defends the existence of God. They conclude the necessary condition of belief to be exposed to revelation that atheists deny calling transcendental necessity. Human experience and action is proof of God’s existence as His existence is the necessary condition of human being’s intelligibility. The spirituality exists in all human sub-consciousness and sometimes, reveals to consciousness of some individuals. Human being’s inability to conceive the cosmos shows that there exist more types of creatures in different parts of universe. Enlightened men’s capability to resurrect corpse proves soul’s immortality.
    [Show full text]
  • C.S. Lewis's Trilemma Seen Through Muslim Eyes
    C.S. LEWIS’S TRILEMMA SEEN THROUGH MUSLIM EYES Christian TĂMAȘ Independent Scholar Abstract Beyond his apologetic works about Jesus Christ and the Christian faith, C.S. Lewis polarized the religious and non-religious world with his famous Trilemma expressing his opinion on the nature and identity of Christ. While for the Christians and atheists C.S. Lewis's Trilemma is still a matter of rather harsh debate, for the Muslims it represents a matter of lesser importance. Some of those acquainted with C.S. Lewis's ideas approached it with caution taking into account the Qur’anic statements about the revelations previously “descended” upon man, which generally prevent the Muslims from commenting or interpreting the other monotheistic scriptures. Thus, many Muslim scholars consider C.S. Lewis's Trilemma a Christian affair not of their concern, while others object to its content considered incompatible with the Islamic views concerning the person of Jesus Christ. Keywords: C.S. Lewis, trilemma, Jesus Christ, Islamic Tradition, Qur’an Introduction Considered one of the most influential Christian authors of the past century, C.S. Lewis built a personal theological system starting from the premise that there is a natural law which human beings – necessarily submitted to its influences— must unconditionally accept. Thus, in his opinion, God must exist in His Trinitarian nature as Father, Son and Holy Spirit where the relationship between the Father and Son is the source of divine Love which acts through the Holy Spirit. As a conservative apologist, C.S. Lewis made of the person and the nature of Jesus Christ the central themes of his life and work.
    [Show full text]
  • You Will Be Like the Gods”: the Conceptualization of Deity in the Hebrew Bible in Cognitive Perspective
    “YOU WILL BE LIKE THE GODS”: THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF DEITY IN THE HEBREW BIBLE IN COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE by Daniel O. McClellan A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Master of Arts in Biblical Studies We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard ............................................................................... Dr. Craig Broyles, PhD; Thesis Supervisor ................................................................................ Dr. Martin Abegg, PhD; Second Reader TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY December, 2013 © Daniel O. McClellan Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 1.1 Summary and Outline 1 1.2 Cognitive Linguistics 3 1.2.1 Profiles and Bases 8 1.2.2 Domains and Matrices 10 1.2.3 Prototype Theory 13 1.2.4 Metaphor 16 1.3 Cognitive Linguistics in Biblical Studies 19 1.3.1 Introduction 19 1.3.2 Conceptualizing Words for “God” within the Pentateuch 21 1.4 The Method and Goals of This Study 23 Chapter 2 – Cognitive Origins of Deity Concepts 30 2.1 Intuitive Conceptualizations of Deity 31 2.1.1 Anthropomorphism 32 2.1.2 Agency Detection 34 2.1.3 The Next Step 36 2.2. Universal Image-Schemas 38 2.2.1 The UP-DOWN Image-Schema 39 2.2.2 The CENTER-PERIPHERY Image-Schema 42 2.3 Lexical Considerations 48 48 אלהים 2.3.1 56 אל 2.3.2 60 אלוה 2.3.3 2.4 Summary 61 Chapter 3 – The Conceptualization of YHWH 62 3.1 The Portrayals of Deity in the Patriarchal and Exodus Traditions 64 3.1.1 The Portrayal of the God of the Patriarchs
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitarian' Pneumatology in the New Testament? -Towards An
    'TRINITARIAN' PNEUMATOLOGY IN THE NEW TESTAMENT?-ToWARDS AN EXPLANATION OF THE WORSHIP OF JESUS ... MAx TURNER. Members of the British New Testarnent Society have spent considerable time and energy on the important questions of when, how and why Jesus came to be worshipped as God.' Very much less time has been spent on the status of the Spirit, and a trawl through the massive secondary literature of our discipline catches rela­ tively few relevant fish. There are I think at least two obvious explanations for this. One is what Professor Hurtado has called 'the binitarian shape of early Christian worship' - that is, it appears that in the apostolic church cultic veneration was offered to the Father and to the Son, but not apparently to the Spirit.2 We have to wait for the 2nd Century Martyrdom and Ascension of Isaiah (9.33-36) before we encounter worship addressed to the Spirit. Second, debates about the personhood of the Spirit are understood to be secondary to and even largely parasitic on the Christo logical debates. One first settles the question of the divinity of Jesus, this establishes the all­ important principle of plurality within the unity of God; then one can set about the relatively minor mopping up operation with respect to the Spirit. Arthur Wainwright comments: The Spirit seems to have been included in the doctrine of God almost as an afterthought about which men had no strong feelings, either favourable or hostile'.] Wainwright was speaking, of course, about Patristic developments, but one could apply it (mutatis mutandis) to NT scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presence of the Holy Spirit in the Context of Christianity in Asia: from the Perspective of Frederick E
    The Presence of the Holy Spirit in the Context of Christianity in Asia: From the Perspective of Frederick E. Crowe and the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences (FABC) Lonergan on the Edge 2014 Doctor of Theology Program Theology Department Regis College, Toronto School of Theology University of Toronto Heejung Adele Cho September 5, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. The Specific Character of Asian Theology with Regard to Religious Pluralism ...................... 4 2. Exposition of Frederick E. Crowe’s Concerns ........................................................................... 7 2.1. Philosophy of Interiority in Roman Catholic Theology ...................................................... 8 2.2. A Balance between the Two Missions ............................................................................... 11 3. Pneumatology from an Asian Perspective Expressed by the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences (FABC) .................................................................................................................... 13 3.1. The Resonances of the Fruits of the Holy Spirit in Asian Religio-cultural Traditions ..... 14 3.1.1. Hinduism ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2. Buddhism .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Usage of the Title Elohim
    Religious Educator: Perspectives on the Restored Gospel Volume 14 Number 1 Article 8 1-2013 Usage of the Title Elohim Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/re BYU ScholarsArchive Citation "Usage of the Title Elohim." Religious Educator: Perspectives on the Restored Gospel 14, no. 1 (2013): 108-127. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/re/vol14/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Educator: Perspectives on the Restored Gospel by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Usage of the Title Elohim ryan conrad davis and paul y. hoskisson Ryan Conrad Davis ([email protected]) is a graduate student in Hebrew Bible and the ancient Near East at the University of Texas at Austin. Paul Y. Hoskisson ([email protected]) is professor of ancient scripture and director of the Laura F. Willes Center for Book of Mormon Studies at Brigham Young University. Reprinted, with minor changes, from Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown, ed. Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin (Provo, UT: Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, 2011), 113–35. ince the word elohim never occurs in any of our English Latter-day Saint Sscriptures1 (though it appears more than twenty-six hundred times in the Hebrew text), it may seem unusual that Latter-day Saints use the term elohim at all. Yet use it we do. For nearly one hundred years now, Latter-day Saints have understood and more or less used elohim as “the name-title of God the Eternal Father.”2 Yet historically they have not always used the term in this strict sense.
    [Show full text]