DOCSLIB.ORG

Between Monotheism and Tawhid: a Comparative Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Between Monotheism and Tawhid: a Comparative Analysis Revelation and Science Vol. 03, No. 02 (1435H/2013) 23-29 Between Monotheism and Tawhid: A Comparative Analysis Abdurezak A. Hashi Department of Biotechnology, Kulliyyah of Science, International Islamic University Malaysia Abstract In contemporary academic discourse, there are instances of “monotheism” and “tawhid” being used as synonymous terms, as if these words signified the same conceptual connotations about the belief in, and the unity of, God. Consequently, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, are categorized together as monotheistic religions. However, is it true that monotheism and tawhid are synonymous or identical concepts? Using analytical and comparative methods, this paper compares and contrasts these two terms, and identifies the conceptual and theological properties of each. Keywords: belief, unity of God, monotheism, tawhid Abstrak Dalam domain akademik kontemporari, terdapat insiden di mana ‘monoteisme’ dan ‘tauhid’ digunakan sebagai istilah sinonim; seolah-olah konsep-konsep ini menandakan penotasian konsep yang sama tentang kepercayaan dan kesatuan Tuhan dan menghasilkan agama seperti agama Yahudi, Kristian dan Islam, yang dikategorikan sebagai monoteis. Walau bagaimanapun, adakah benar bahawa monoteisme dan tauhid adalah konsep yang sinonim atau sama? Melalui kaedah analisis dan perbandingan, kajian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan dan membezakan antara kedua-dua konsep, dan mengenalpasti ciri-ciri sebenar konsep dan teologi bagi setiap istilah. Kata kunci: kepercayaan, kesatuan Tuhan, monoteisme, tauhid Introduction: between monotheism and other thus monotheism teaches the sense of worshiping belief systems only one god. Third, monotheism includes the Monotheism is a combination of two words, ‘mono’ doctrine that there exists one god who is the source of and ‘theism’. The former is from the Greek origins, life.iii Thus, monotheism represents the belief in one and it means ‘one’ or ‘single’, while theism is also personal God, who is the creator and the ruler of the derived from the Greek word theos or God, thus universe. Monotheism does not allow the one God to monotheism denotes, literally, one God or one be limited even by the causes of destruction and evil; thought about God;i it stands for the belief in one the causes cannot be divine forces outside the will of personal God as the Creator and the Supreme ruler of the one God.iv the universe.ii Monotheism consists of number of Generally speaking, monotheism teaches the belief interrelated senses, including the sense that there is in the existence of one personal God who is the something improper and illegitimate in worshiping creator and ruler of the universe, and thus it more than one god, as well as not worshiping any distinguishes itself from number of belief systems god; in this sense both atheism and polytheism are including atheism, monism, deism, pantheism, improper. Second, because it holds that there is polytheism, and henotheism. Monotheism denounces something improper to worship more than one god, atheistic doctrines which deny the existence of God;v in this sense, if atheistic doctrines are marked by the *Corresponding author: Abdurezak A. Hashi denial of God, monotheism is founded on the belief in Department of Biotechnology the existence of God. Furthermore, monotheism Kulliyyah of Science teaches the belief in the existence of a single God who International Islamic University Malaysia is transcendent and imminent, and in that sense it Email: [email protected] defines itself against polytheism which teaches Between Monotheism and Tawhid: A Comparative Analysis/ AA Hashi plurality of gods.vi This is because, while polytheists everybody. Likewise, monotheism refuses hold the belief in the divinity of many personal gods henotheistic doctrine which teaches that one god can who have different personal wills, in monotheism the be worshiped as a supreme god at one time and whole realm of the divine power is unified, with no another god in another time.xii In this case, unlike conflicting wills or limitations. Thus, monotheism henotheism, in monotheism, the one God has differs from the polytheistic views of God: “not only authority and power over all people at all times and quantitatively in the number of gods taught, but also places; hence monotheism presents a conception of qualitatively in its understanding of God as absolute one God, who is universal and transcends all kinds of being above nature and in complete mastery of it.”vii tribalism or ethnocentrism. Moreover, monotheism also differs from monism;viii the later represents the tendency to explain all Between Monotheism and Tawhid-Allah phenomena by one unifying principle (energy, sprit, Besides the fact that monotheism, generally, teaches the mater, mind or body) and the rest are manifestations belief in the existence of one personal God, who is the of this single substance, while monotheism teaches Creator and the ruler of the universe, and thus two types of existence, namely, Creator and creations, distinguishes itself from other belief systems as which are distinctively different; the former is mentioned earlier, however, there are divergent transcendental and eternal, while the later is temporal. understandings of monotheism among monotheistic In monotheism there is definite separation between traditions.xiii For some, among monotheistic faiths, the Divine Realm and the universe, while monism monotheism reflects the belief in the existence of denies such separation of the existence. Similarly, many gods, but holds that all gods are essentially one while deism is the belief in a God who created the and the same,xiv so that it makes little or no difference universe;ix a belief which is solely based on reason, under which name or according to which rite a god or monotheism holds the belief in one God who created goddess is invoked.xv Moreover, there are those, the universe; a belief which is based on revelation and among monotheistic traditions like Christians, who justified by reason. The distinction is that, in belief in one personal God, who is the Creator and the monotheism, it is the revelation that describes God ruler of the universe, but tend to express such belief and His attributes, while reason justifies both the need with Trinitarian or binitheism conceptions;xvi in this and the reason of His existence. Moreover, in sense, God is one but three in one, or two in one. monotheism: “humans find value and integration of However, among the monotheistic faiths, there are meaning by realizing their common creaturehood and some, like Muslims, and to some extent Judaism,xvii serving this One universal God”,x while in deism, who do not agree with the existence of more than one religiosity is achieved only through interaction God, “other gods either simply do not exist at all, or between human mind and the nature. Deism denies at most, they are false gods or demons; i.e., beings the value of revelation in the belief of God; however, that are acknowledged to exist but that cannot be monotheism holds that God exposes Himself through compared in power or any other way with the One revelation and Prophethood, thus revelation and and Only true God.”xviii Prophethood are the bases of belief in God. For instant, the Qur’anic perspective of monotheism Finally, monotheism distinguishes itself from is exclusively uncompromising as compared to other henotheism or monolatry;xi this is because henotheism monotheistic traditions like Christianity; in the Qur’an reflects the tendency of worshipping many gods but Allah (s. w. t.) is confessed as being one, eternal, rising one of the gods as a supreme god. This entails unbegotten, unequalled and beyond partnership of any to accept the existence of many gods, but selecting kind.xix In this understanding of monotheism, God is one of them as a higher god above other gods. characterized with absolute singularity; neither could Monolatry also implies that certain community might there be division in substance nor humanization in worship one god as a supreme god over other gods, attributes, and worship is due to Him only, no other while other communities are allowed to have their gods, lesser or greater, are conceivable beside Him. In gods. Apparently, the tendency of worshipping one contrast to ethnocentric and Trinitarian beliefs of supreme god over lesser gods, would eventually God, this type of monotheism requires the belief in imply plurality of gods, thus monotheism dismisses one God whose “nature is (highly) elevated, so far henotheism, and teaches the belief in one God for all. beyond our limited conceptions. He is the One and Henotheism tends to localize (nationalize) God, while Only God, the Only One to Whom worship is due; all monotheism universalizes the power and authority of other things or beings that we can think of are His the one personal God, whereby the idea of lesser or creatures and in no way should be compared or supreme gods has no place in monotheism; thus in associated to Him. He is Eternal without beginning or monotheism there is only one God for everyone and end, Absolute; not limited by time, space or 24 | Revelation and Science | Vol. 03, No. 02 (1435H/2013) Between Monotheism and Tawhid: A Comparative Analysis/ AA Hashi circumstance. He is the Ultimate Reality.”xx This kind and the uniqueness and absolute transcendence of the of belief in the One God, Allah (s. w. t.), is known in divine Being were stressed. Thus, in the Islamic Islam as Tawhid-Allah or the belief in the unity of conception, all creations stand on same side of the Allah, which sounds, in the general outlook, similar to line dividing the transcendent from the natural, and monotheism, but differs it in various aspects. that is the necessary presupposition of God’s Tawhid-Allah is a combination of two words; axiological ultimacy.xxx Similarly, the Zoroastrian tawhid (unity), and Allah (God); the former conception of monotheism is neither comparable nor characterizes the latter as one which cannot be compatible with the monotheism taught by Islam.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Invention Of
    How Did God Get Started? COLIN WELLS the usual suspects One day in the Middle East about four thousand years ago, an elderly but still rather astonishingly spry gentleman took his son for a walk up a hill. The young man carried on his back some wood that his father had told him they would use at the top to make an altar, upon which they would then perform the ritual sacrifice of a burnt offering. Unbeknownst to the son, however, the father had another sort of sacrifice in mind altogether. Abraham, the father, had been commanded, by the God he worshipped as supreme above all others, to sacrifice the young man himself, his beloved and only legitimate son, Isaac. We all know how things turned out, of course. An angel appeared, together with a ram, letting Abraham know that God didn’t really want him to kill his son, that he should sacrifice the ram instead, and that the whole thing had merely been a test. And to modern observers, at least, it’s abundantly clear what exactly was being tested. Should we pose the question to most people familiar with one of the three “Abrahamic” religious traditions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), all of which trace their origins to this misty figure, and which together claim half the world’s population, the answer would come without hesitation. God was testing Abraham’s faith. If we could ask someone from a much earlier time, however, a time closer to that of Abraham himself, the answer might be different. The usual story we tell ourselves about faith and reason says that faith was invented by the ancient Jews, whose monotheistic tradition goes back to Abraham.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitarian' Pneumatology in the New Testament? -Towards An
    'TRINITARIAN' PNEUMATOLOGY IN THE NEW TESTAMENT?-ToWARDS AN EXPLANATION OF THE WORSHIP OF JESUS ... MAx TURNER. Members of the British New Testarnent Society have spent considerable time and energy on the important questions of when, how and why Jesus came to be worshipped as God.' Very much less time has been spent on the status of the Spirit, and a trawl through the massive secondary literature of our discipline catches rela­ tively few relevant fish. There are I think at least two obvious explanations for this. One is what Professor Hurtado has called 'the binitarian shape of early Christian worship' - that is, it appears that in the apostolic church cultic veneration was offered to the Father and to the Son, but not apparently to the Spirit.2 We have to wait for the 2nd Century Martyrdom and Ascension of Isaiah (9.33-36) before we encounter worship addressed to the Spirit. Second, debates about the personhood of the Spirit are understood to be secondary to and even largely parasitic on the Christo logical debates. One first settles the question of the divinity of Jesus, this establishes the all­ important principle of plurality within the unity of God; then one can set about the relatively minor mopping up operation with respect to the Spirit. Arthur Wainwright comments: The Spirit seems to have been included in the doctrine of God almost as an afterthought about which men had no strong feelings, either favourable or hostile'.] Wainwright was speaking, of course, about Patristic developments, but one could apply it (mutatis mutandis) to NT scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presence of the Holy Spirit in the Context of Christianity in Asia: from the Perspective of Frederick E
    The Presence of the Holy Spirit in the Context of Christianity in Asia: From the Perspective of Frederick E. Crowe and the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences (FABC) Lonergan on the Edge 2014 Doctor of Theology Program Theology Department Regis College, Toronto School of Theology University of Toronto Heejung Adele Cho September 5, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. The Specific Character of Asian Theology with Regard to Religious Pluralism ...................... 4 2. Exposition of Frederick E. Crowe’s Concerns ........................................................................... 7 2.1. Philosophy of Interiority in Roman Catholic Theology ...................................................... 8 2.2. A Balance between the Two Missions ............................................................................... 11 3. Pneumatology from an Asian Perspective Expressed by the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences (FABC) .................................................................................................................... 13 3.1. The Resonances of the Fruits of the Holy Spirit in Asian Religio-cultural Traditions ..... 14 3.1.1. Hinduism ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2. Buddhism .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Original Monotheism: a Signal of Transcendence Challenging
    Liberty University Original Monotheism: A Signal of Transcendence Challenging Naturalism and New Ageism A Thesis Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Divinity in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Ministry Department of Christian Leadership and Church Ministries by Daniel R. Cote Lynchburg, Virginia April 5, 2020 Copyright © 2020 by Daniel R. Cote All Rights Reserved ii Liberty University School of Divinity Thesis Project Approval Sheet Dr. T. Michael Christ Adjunct Faculty School of Divinity Dr. Phil Gifford Adjunct Faculty School of Divinity iii THE DOCTOR OF MINISTRY THESIS PROJECT ABSTRACT Daniel R. Cote Liberty University School of Divinity, 2020 Mentor: Dr. T. Michael Christ Where once in America, belief in Christian theism was shared by a large majority of the population, over the last 70 years belief in Christian theism has significantly eroded. From 1948 to 2018, the percent of Americans identifying as Catholic or Christians dropped from 91 percent to 67 percent, with virtually all the drop coming from protestant denominations.1 Naturalism and new ageism increasingly provide alternative means for understanding existential reality without the moral imperatives and the belief in the divine associated with Christian theism. The ironic aspect of the shifting of worldviews underway in western culture is that it continues with little regard for strong evidence for the truth of Christian theism emerging from historical, cultural, and scientific research. One reality long overlooked in this regard is the research of Wilhelm Schmidt and others, which indicates that the earliest religion of humanity is monotheism. Original monotheism is a strong indicator of the existence of a transcendent God who revealed Himself as portrayed in Genesis 1-11, thus affirming the truth of essential elements of Christian theism and the falsity of naturalism and new ageism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gospel of John and the Future of Israel by Christopher Mark
    The Gospel of John and the Future of Israel by Christopher Mark Blumhofer Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date: October 23, 2017 Approved: ___________________________ Richard B. Hays, Supervisor ___________________________ Joel Marcus ___________________________ C. Kavin Rowe ___________________________ Stephen Chapman ___________________________ Daniel Boyarin Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 ABSTRACT The Gospel of John and the Future of Israel by Christopher Mark Blumhofer Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date: October 23, 2017 Approved: ___________________________ Richard B. Hays, Supervisor ___________________________ Joel Marcus ___________________________ C. Kavin Rowe ___________________________ Stephen Chapman ___________________________ Daniel Boyarin An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 Copyright by Christopher Mark Blumhofer 2017 Abstract The canonical gospels are each concerned to present the significance of Jesus vis-à-vis the Jewish tradition. Yet the Gospel of John exhibits a particularly strained relationship with Judaism, especially through its frequent description of Jesus’s opponents as “the Jews,” its presentation of numerous hostile exchanges between Jesus and characters described as “Jews,” and its application of significant Jewish imagery (e.g., “the temple of his body,” “I am the true vine”) to the person of Jesus rather than to traditional Jewish institutions or figures. This dissertation argues that the Gospel of John presents Jesus as the one through whom the Jewish tradition realizes its eschatological hopes in continuity with the stories and symbols of its past.
    [Show full text]
  • Monotheism in the Nature of Prayer in the Abrahamic Religions
    Special Issue INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND January 2016 CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926 Monotheism in the Nature of Prayer in the Abrahamic Religions Qasem Kakaei1 Mahdi Mo’meni2 Abstract Prayer is one of the most fundamental and most important characteristic of religions, especially the monotheistic religions that contain a large part of the literature of all faiths. The nature of prayer in prayer in monotheistic religions has two major directions: God-man. God is located in the main direction of this nature as the faith in Him forms the prayer. It is belief in His oneness (tawhid) and belief in the fact that He is the only listener to every prayer. The belief in God’s tawhid in pious prayer will mean when man knows that the the beginning of every prayer is the spirit of monotheism. In other words, it is the establishment of a unique God, His servitude, and denying servitude of other than God or numerous gods. As a common point in monotheistic religions, this principle has formed a very close literature in available liturgical texts. A study on available liturgical texts can lead us to uncover the position of tawhid in the nature of pious prayers. Keywords: tawhid, Abrahamic religions, nature of prayer, prayer management. 1 Phd. Professor at Shiraz University. [email protected] 2 Phd Student, Islamic Sufism and Mysticism, Qom University of Religions and Denominations. [email protected] http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index Page 2342 Special Issue INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND January 2016 CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Explanation of Christological Origins a Review of the Work of Larry W
    A NEW EXPLANATION OF CHRISTOLOGICAL ORIGINS A REVIEW OF THE WORK OF LARRY W. HURTADO Crispin Fletcher-Louis Summary Prof. Larry Hurtado’s three-volume work on christological origins has advanced understanding in several key respects and his account is simpler than that of his predecessors. However, it remains an evolutionary, multi-stage model and it is historically problematic. He overstates the case for Jewish opposition to Christ-devotion, minimises the ethical particularity of earliest Christianity and the model suffers some serious internal tensions. His claim that religious experiences gave the decisive impetus to Christ-devotion does not reckon adequately with the implications of social-science study, is not supported by the primary texts and conflicts with the important evidence that visionary and mystical practices were frowned upon in some early Christian quarters. Hurtado presents his work as theologically disinterested. However, he endorses Lessing’s radical separation of theology and history and this theologically loaded judgement seems to be reflected in the non-incarnational character of the Christology Hurtado describes. 1. Introduction Over the last thirty years Prof. Larry Hurtado has worked tirelessly on the nature and origins of early Christology. In the last few years that work has culminated in the publication of two lengthy monographs that develop the thesis first presented in a book published in 1988.1 Each of 1 L. W. Hurtado, One God, One Lord: Early Christian Devotion and Ancient Jewish Monotheism (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988); idem, Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus 162 TYNDALE BULLETIN 60.2 (2009) Hurtado’s three book-length contributions to this subject has been reviewed by others.2 My purpose here is to offer an appreciative critique of the cumulative case Hurtado has now made for his understanding of christological origins.
    [Show full text]
  • King Henry School Year 7 Knowledge Organiser
    King Henry School Polytheism Atheism The Cosmological argument Year 7 Knowledge Organiser Hinduism is often depicted as a polytheistic According to thinkers like Richard The cosmological argument is an attempt to religion, which means the belief in many Religion and beliefs about God Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, prove the existence of God by the fact that Sources: gods that operate in the natural world. and Sam Harris, belief in God is things exist. It assumes that things must have a https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zygbtv4/revision/1 The three main deities in Hinduism, known irrational. Atheism has attracted cause, and that the chain of causes can only end Key Terms as the Trimurti, are Brahma, the creator, millions of people due to by a supernatural event. Vishnu, the preserver, and Shiva, the bestselling books such as The God Literalist – a person who adheres to destroyer. The word Trimurti means ‘three Delusion and God Is Not Great. The Ontological argument. the literal representation of the bible. forms’. Non Literalist – a person who does not The Ontological argument rests on the take the literal interpretation of the identification of God as “that than which no Bible. Monotheism and Theist greater can be conceived”. Once it is understood Prayers – a request for help or that God is that than which no greater can be expression of thanks to God. There are still a large majority of people conceived, Anselm suggests, it becomes evident Miracles – an event that cannot be in the world who would consider that God must exist. In other words if God explained by science.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Thesis
    MONOTHEISTIC DISCOURSE AND DEIFICATION OF JESUS IN EARLY CHRISTIANITY AS EXEMPLIFIED IN 2 CORINTHIANS 3:16–4:6 by DAVID KANE BERNARD submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY in the subject of NEW TESTAMENT at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA PROMOTER: DR G VAN DEN HEEVER DECEMBER 2014 SUMMARY One of the central issues of early Christianity was the identity of Jesus Christ. Paul and other early Christians discussed this question within the framework of traditional Jewish monotheism and used the language of deity to describe Christ. This thesis explores how and why they integrated the two concepts of monotheism and the deity of Jesus. As a window into this process, it particularly examines Paul’s discourse in 2 Cor 3:16–4:6, employing grammatical-historical exegesis with insights from rhetorical criticism and Oneness Pentecostal Christology. We consider three fundamental questions: (1) What does the exalted language concerning Christ in this text represent? (2) How did Paul reconcile the deification of Jesus with his monotheistic heritage? (3) Why did Paul deify Jesus? What interests were served, and what were the practical consequences? The conclusion is that early Christians, prior to and including Paul, worshiped Jesus within a Jewish monotheistic context and not as a result of Hellenization. They viewed Jesus as the revelation of the one God, not as a second deity or a different personage. Although they reinterpreted their core beliefs in light of Jesus, they did not see their worship of Jesus as violating their core beliefs. The evidence from Paul’s Corinthian correspondence does not require an explicit binitarian or trinitarian model, but it reveals that many early Christians viewed God as both transcendent and immanent and worshiped Jesus as the God of Israel manifested in human identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms/Stanley J
    Pocket Dictionaryof THEOLOGICALTHEOLOGICAL TERMSTERMS Over 300 terms clearly & concisely defined STANLEY J. GRENZ , DAVI D GURETZKI & CHERITH FEE NOR D LIN G Pocket Dictionaryof THEOLOGICAL TERMS STANLEY J. GRENZ , DAVI D GURETZKI & CHERITH FEE NOR D LIN G InterVa rsity Press Downers Grove, Illinois InterVarsity Press P.O. Box 1400, Downers Grove, IL 60515 World Wide Web: www.ivpress.com E-mail: [email protected] ©1999 by Stanley J. Grenz, David Guretzki and Cherith Fee Nordling All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from InterVarsity Press. InterVarsity Press® is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA®, a student movement active on campus at hundreds of universities, colleges and schools of nursing in the United States of America, and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students. For information about local and regional activities, write Public Relations Dept., InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA, 6400 Schroeder Rd., P.O. Box 7895, Madison, WI 53707-7895, or visit the IVCF website at <www. intervarsity org>. All Scripture quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from the Holy ible, New International Version®. NIV®. Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. Cover illustration: Roberta Polfus ISBN 978-0-8308-6707-3 InterVarsity Press P.O. Box 1400, Downers Grove, IL 60515 World Wide Web: www.ivpress.com E-mail: [email protected] ©1999 by Stanley J. Grenz, David Guretzki and Cherith Fee Nordling All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from InterVarsity Press.
    [Show full text]
  • The Word Became Flesh: an Exploratory Essay on Jesus's
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects The orW d Became Flesh: An Exploratory Essay on Jesus’s Particularity and Nonhuman Animals Andy Alexis-Baker Marquette University Recommended Citation Alexis-Baker, Andy, "The orW d Became Flesh: An Exploratory Essay on Jesus’s Particularity and Nonhuman Animals" (2015). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 596. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/596 THE WORD BECAME FLESH: AN EXPLORATORY ESSAY ON JESUS’S PARTICULARITY AND NONHUMAN ANIMALS by Andy Alexis-Baker A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin December 2015 ABSTRACT THE WORD BECAME FLESH: AN EXPLORATORY ESSAY ON JESUS’S PARTICULARITY AND NONHUMAN ANIMALS Andy Alexis-Baker Marquette University, 2015 In this exploratory work I argue that Jesus’s particularity as a Jewish, male human is essential for developing Christian theology about nonhuman animals. The Gospel of John says that the Word became “flesh” not that the Word became “human.” By using flesh, John’s Gospel connects the Incarnation to the Jewish notion of all animals. The Gospel almost always uses flesh in a wider sense than meaning human. The Bread of Life discourse makes this explicit when Jesus compares his flesh to “meat,” offending his hearers because they see themselves as above other animals. Other animals are killable and consumable; humans are not. The notion that the Word became flesh has gained prominence in ecotheology, particularly in theologians identifying with deep Incarnation. Unless this notion is connected to Jesus’s particularity, however, there is danger in sacrificing the individual for the whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christian Binitarianism: the Father and the Holy Spirit
    Barnes - Early Christian Binitarianism – as read at NAPS 2001 1 Early Christian Binitarianism: the Father and the Holy Spirit The word “binitarian” is typically used by scholars and theologians as a contrast to a trinitarian theology: a theology of “two” in God rather than a theology of “three”. I believe that it is accurate to offer the judgment that most commonly when someone speaks of a Christian “binitarian” theology the “two” in God are the Father and the Son. In the classic scholarly articulations of binitarianism, the Holy Spirit is collapsed into the person of the Son, either by stressing the possessive genitive – the spirit of the Son - or by offering a kind of “spirit Christology,” in which “spirit” refers to the divine in Christ. As the title of this article suggests, I am going to argue something slightly different. However provocative or hyperbolic the title may seem my fundamental thesis has its beginning in the close reading of a text – in this case, Justin’s Dialogue With Trypho. The Dialogue consists predominately of an extended series of exegetical arguments by Justin showing that Jesus does indeed fit the descriptions of the Messiah found in the books of the Prophets. Justin gets Trypho to agree that there are two aspects of the Messiah: the triumphant and the suffering. Once Trypho agrees to this Justin can then identify the “suffering” aspect of the prophesied Messiah with the crucifixion and death of Jesus, and identify the triumphant with Jesus’ Resurrection and Second Coming. Trypho gives ground on christology only when he is forced to by Justin’s extensive and detailed exegesis of select texts which both of them hold to be Scripture.
    [Show full text]