Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bibliography Bibliography Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life , trans. D. Heller- Roazen (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press). Ahrensdorf, P. J. (1997) “Thucydides’ Realist Critique of Realism,” Polity 30, 231–65. Alker, H. R., Jr. (1988) “The Dialectical Logic of Thucydides’ Melian Dialogue,” American Political Science Review 82.3, 805–20. Anastasiadis, V. I. (2013) Interest and Self-Interest in Ancient Athens (Hildesheim: Olms). Armitage, D. (2000) The Ideological Origins of the British Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Avant, D., M. Finnemore, and S. K. Sell (eds.) (2010) Who Governs the Globe? (New York: Cambridge University Press). Balot, R. K. (2001a) Greed and Injustice in Classical Athens (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). ——— (2001b) “Pericles’ Anatomy of Democratic Courage,” American Journal of Philology 122, 505–25. ——— (2009) “The Virtue Politics of Democratic Athens,” in S. Salkever (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 271–300. ——— (2014) Courage in the Democratic Polis: Ideology and Critique in Classical Athens (New York: Oxford University Press). Baltrusch, E. (1994) Symmachie und Spondai: Untersuchungen zum griechischen V ö lkerrecht der archaischen und klassischen Zeit (8.–5. Jahrhundert v. Chr) (Berlin: De Gruyter). Baltrusch, E. and C. Wendt (eds.) (2011) Ein Besitz fü r immer? Geschichte, Polis und V ö lkerrecht bei Thukydides (Baden-Baden: Nomos). Barcel ó , P. (1990) “Thukydides und die Tyrannis,” Historia 39, 401–25. Bayer, E. (1968) “Thukydides und Perikles,” in H. Herter (ed.) Thukydides (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), pp. 171–259. Bedford, D. and T. Workman (2001) “The Tragic Reading of the Thucydidean Tragedy,” Review of International Studies 27, 51–67. Bell, D. S. (2003) “Political Theory and the Functions of Intellectual History,” Review of International Studies 29, 151–60. 176 ● Bibliography Bender, G. F. (1938) Der Begriff des Staatsmannes bei Thukydides (Würzburg: K. Triltsch). Bernhardt, R. (1987) “Die Entstehung der Legende von der tyrannenfeindlichen Au ßenpolitik Spartas im sechsten und f ü nften Jahrhundert v. Chr.,” Historia 36, 257–89. Berve, H. (1967) Die Tyrannis bei den Griechen , 2 vols (Munich: Beck). Bloedow, E. F. (2000) “The Implications of a Major Contradiction in Pericles’ Career,” Hermes 128, 295–309. Bosworth, A. B. (2000) “The Historical Context of Pericles’ Funeral Oration,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 120, 1–16. Brady, H. E. and D. Collier (2010) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield). Bridge, C. (2013) Sea-Power and Other Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Burns, T. W. (forthcoming) “The Problematic Character of Pericles’ Civic Republicanism,” in G. Kellow and N. Leddy (eds.) Civic Republicanism, Enlightenment and Modernity: Ancient Lessons for Global Politics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press). Canfora, L. (1990) Die verlorene Geschichte des Thukydides (Berlin: Rotbuch). Cawkwell, G. (1997) Thucydides and the Peloponnesian War (London: Routledge). Chambers, M. (ed.) (1990) Aristoteles: Staat der Athener (Berlin: Akademie Verlag). Christ, M. R. (2006) The Bad Citizen in Classical Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Classen, C. J. (1996) “APXH: Its Earliest Use,” Scripta Classica Israelica 15, 20–4. Cochrane, C. N. (1929) Thucydides and the Science of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Connor, W. R. (1977a) “A Post Modernist Thucydides?,” The Classical Journal 72.4, 289–98. ——— (1977b) “Tyrannis Polis,” in J. H. D’Arms and J. W. Eadie (eds.) Ancient and Modern: Essays in Honor of Gerald F. Else (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 95–109. ——— (1984) Thucydides . (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). ——— (1991) “Polarization in Thucydides” in R. N. Lebow and B. S. Strauss (eds.) Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age (Boulder, CO: Westview), pp. 53–69. Constantakopoulou, C. (2007) The Dance of the Islands: Insularity, Networks, the Athenian Empire, and the Aegean World (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Cornford, F. M. D. (1907) Thucydides Mythistoricus (London: Edward Arnold). Crane, G. (1998) Thucydides and the Ancient Simplicity (Berkeley: University of California Press). C rowe, E. (1928) “Memorandum on the Present State of British Relations with France and Germany,” in G. P. Gooch and H. Temperley (eds.) British Documents on the Origins of the War: 1898–1914 , vol. 3 (London; repr. New York 1967, Johnson Reprint), pp. 397–420. Bibliography ● 177 ——— (1981) The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World (London: Duckworth). Deininger, G. (1939) Der Melier-Dialog (Thuk. V 85–113) (Erlangen: Krahl). Diesner, H. J. (1959) “Peisistratidenexkurs und Peisistratidenbild bei Thukydides,” Historia 8, 12–22. ——— (1980) “Thukydides und Thomas Hobbes,” Historia 29, 1–16. Donnelly, J. (2000) Realism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Dover, K. J. (1974) Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle (Oxford: Blackwell). Doyle, M. W. (1990) “Thucydidean Realism,” Review of International Studies 16.3, 223–37. Dreher, M. (1983) Sophistik und Polisentwicklung: Die sophistischen Staatstheorien des 5. Jh. v. Chr. und ihr Bezug auf Entstehung und Wesen des griechischen, vor- rangig athenischen Staates (Frankfurt: Peter Lang). ——— (2008) Das antike Sizilien (Munich: Beck). ——— (2014) “Die Frauen der Tyrannen,” in U. Bultrighini and E. Dimauro (eds.) Donne che contano nella storia greca (Lanciano: Carabba), pp. 237–67. Drews, R. (1983) Basileus: The Evidence of Kingship in Geometric Greece (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press). Drexler, H. (1976) Thukydides-Studien (Hildesheim: Olms). Dunn, J. (2000) “Trust and Political Agency,” in D. Gambetta (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations , electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, chapter 5, pp. 73–93, http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/ papers/dunn73-93.pdf . Dunne, T. and B. Schmidt (2001) “Realism,” in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds.) The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations , 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 141–62. Dylan, B. (2004) Chronicles: Volume One (New York: Simon & Schuster). Erbse, H. (1989) Thukydides-Interpretationen (Berlin: De Gruyter). Euben, J. P. (1990) The Tragedy of Political Theory: The Road Not Taken (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). Fantasia, U. (ed.) (2003) Tucidide: La Guerra del Peloponneso. Libro II (Pisa: Edizioni ETS). Figal, G. (ed.) (2007) Hans-Georg Gadamer: Wahrheit und Methode (Berlin: Akademie Verlag). Finley, J. H. (1942) Thucydides (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). Flanagan, G. B. (2007) “Thucydides on the Political Soul” (Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago). Flashar, H. (1969) Der Epitaphios des Perikles: Seine Funktion im Geschichtswerk des Thukydides (Heidelberg: Winter). ——— (1989) “Der Epitaphios des Perikles. Seine Funktion im Geschichtswerk des Thukydides,” in M. Kraus (ed.) Eidola: Ausgew ä hlte kleine Schriften (Amsterdam: B. R. Gr ü ner), pp. 435–83. [revised edition of the 1969 version]. Floyd, J. (2009) “Is Political Philosophy Too Ahistorical?,” Critical Review of International Sociology and Political Philosophy 12, 513–33. 178 ● Bibliography Floyd, J. and M. Stears (2011) Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Forde, S. P. (1989) The Ambition to Rule: Alcibiades and the Politics of Imperialism in Thucydides (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press). ——— (2012) “Thucydides and Realism among the Classics of International Relations,” in K. Harloe and N. Morley (eds.) Thucydides and the Modern World: Reception, Reinterpretation and Influence from the Renaissance to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 178–97. Foster, E. (2010) Thucydides, Pericles, and Periclean Imperialism (New York: Cambridge University Press). Foster, E. and D. Lateiner (eds.) (2012) Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Gadamer, H.-G. (2004) Truth and Method , 2nd rev. edn, trans. J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall (New York: Continuum). ——— (2008) Philosophical Hermeneutics , ed. and trans. D. E. Linge (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press). Ganghof, S. (2005) “Vergleichen in qualitativer und quantitativer Politikwissenschaft: X-zentrierte versus Y-zentrierte Forschungsstrategien,” in S. Kropp and M. Minkenberg (eds.) Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag), pp. 76–93. Gardiner, T. (1969) “Terms for Thalassocracy in Thucydides,” Rheinisches Museum f ü r Philologie 112, 16–22. Garst, D. (1989) “Thucydides and Neorealism,” International Studies Quarterly 33.1, 3–27. George, J. (1994) Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations (Boulder: Lynne Rienner). Geuss, R. (2005) Outside Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press). Gilpin, R. S. (1984) “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism,” International Organization 38, 287–304. Gomme, A. W., A. Andrewes, and K. J. Dover (1945–81) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides , 5 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Gordon, P. E. (2012) “What Is Intellectual History? A Frankly Partisan Introduction to a Frequently Misunderstood Field,” Harvard University
Recommended publications
  • William Greenwalt
    WILLIAM STEVEN GREENWALT DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS, SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY SANTA CLARA, CA. 95053 Education Ph.D. Ancient Greek and Roman History, University of Virginia, May 1985 M.A. Ancient Greek and Roman History, University of Virginia, August 1978 B.A. History and English with High Distinction, University of Virginia, May 1975 Dissertation The Development of Royal Authority in Argead Macedonia Academic Honors, Awards and Distinctions Profiled as a Macedonian Scholar of note in Volume One of the journal, Karanos. ​ ​ Member, the Scott R. Jacobs Fund: endowing graduate students and junior faculty for the study of Alexander the Great and his ancient legacy (2010-). Chair, Department of Classics (2013-14). Director of the Honors Program, Lead Scholars Program and the Office of Fellowships, (2008-12). Chair, Department of Classics, 2000-2006. Teaching Award for Summer Excellence, 2005. Durham Summer Program Professor, 2004. University of California at Berkeley, Visiting Professor, 2004. Faculty Director, Alpha Learning Community, 2003-2006. College of Arts and Sciences Special Recognition Award for Energy, Vision, and Leadership in Pioneering Residential Learning Communities, 2002. College of Arts and Sciences Tenure Committee for the Arts and Humanities. Chair, 2003-2004; Committee Member, 2001-04. Brutocao Award for Teaching Excellence, 2001-2002. Promoted to Full Professor, 2001. Chair, Session III (“The Thracian Kings”), Eighth International Congress of Thracian Studies, Sophia, Bulgaria, 2000. Faculty Founder and Director, Communitas Learning Community, 1999-2003. College of Arts and Sciences David E. Logothetti Teaching Award, 1998-1999. College of Arts and Sciences Tenure Committee for the Arts and Humanities Chair, 1995-1996; Committee Member, 1993-1996.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heraclitus Anecdote: De Partibus Animalium I 5.645A17-23
    Ancient Philosophy 21 (2001) ©Mathesis Publications 1 The Heraclitus Anecdote: De Partibus Animalium i 5.645a17-23 Pavel Gregoric Chapter 5 of the first book of Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium contains a short self-contained treatise (644b22-645a36) which has been characterised as a ‘protreptic to the study of animals’ (Peck in Aristotle 1937, 97). Such a charac- terisation of the treatise may be misleading, because Aristotle does not seem to have composed it in order to motivate his audience to go out in the field and study animals, but rather to kindle their interest in the scientific account of ani- mals which he is about to provide. It is reasonable to suppose that Aristotle’s audience, eager to learn something valuable and dignified, needed an explanation of why they should like to hear, amongst other animals, about sponges, snails, grubs, and other humble creatures which are displeasing even to look at, not to mention witnessing the dissections that might have accompanied Aristotle’s lec- tures on animals (cf. Bonitz 1870, 104a4-17; Lloyd 1978). Aristotle explains why such ignoble animals deserve a place in a scientific account of animals and he illustrates that with an anecdote about Heraclitus. So one must not be childishly repelled by the examination of the humbler animals. For in all things of nature there is some- thing wonderful. And just as Heraclitus is said to have spoken to the visitors who wanted to meet him and who stopped as they were approaching when they saw him warming himself by the oven (e‰don aÈtÚn yerÒmenon prÚw t“ fipn“)—he urged them to come in without fear (§k°leue går aÈtoÁw efisi°nai yarroËntaw), for there were gods there too (e‰nai går ka‹ §ntaËya yeoÊw)—so one must approach the inquiry about each animal without aversion, since in all of them there is something natural and beautiful.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • AS.450 ( Liberal Arts) 1
    AS.450 ( Liberal Arts) 1 AS.450.605. Art Since 1960. 3 Credits. AS.450 ( LIBERAL ARTS) What is contemporary art, and what are the factors that shaped it? This course will attempt to answer those questions through a chronological AS.450.082. MLA Capstone: Portfolio. and thematic investigation of some of the most influential artworks, The MLA Portfolio is a zero-credit Capstone option. Students who select movements, and theories of the past 60 years. Beginning with a close the Portfolio option will take 10 courses in the program (one core course look at mid-century modernism, we will move into a consideration of Pop, and 9 electives), and register for the zero-credit portfolio in their final Minimalism, conceptual art, land art, performance art, postmodernism, semester. The portfolio will be completed within the same semester as AIDS activism, and relational aesthetics. Along the way, we will also the 10th course. The portfolio consists of a sampling of the best papers consider the relevance of feminist and phenomenological theory and of and projects written over the course of the student's graduate career, institutional critique and globalization; at the same time, we will explore and it is designed to highlight the intellectual points of convergence in ways in which art of our own time constitutes both an extension of, and each student's course of study, presenting the student's reflections on reaction against, some of the historical ideas we encounter. Throughout, knowledge gained and lessons learned. students will have a chance to read and discuss both primary and AS.450.600.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials of the Riga 3Rd International Conference on Hellenic Studies
    Materials of the Riga 3rd International Conference on Hellenic Studies Latvijas Universitāte Humanitāro zinātņu fakultāte Klasiskās filoloģijas katedra Hellēnistikas centrs HELLĒŅU DIMENSIJA Rīgas 3. starptautiskās hellēnistikas konferences materiāli Sastādītāji: Brigita Aleksejeva Ojārs Lāms Ilze Rūmniece Latvijas Universitāte University of Latvia Faculty of Humanities Chair of Classical Philology Centre for Hellenic Studies HELLENIC DIMENSION Materials of the Riga 3rd International Conference on Hellenic Studies Editors: Brigita Aleksejeva Ojārs Lāms Ilze Rūmniece University of Latvia UDK 930(063) He 396 The book is financially supported by the Hellenic Republic Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the University of Latvia Grāmata izdota ar Grieķijas Republikas Kultūras un tūrisma ministrijas un Latvijas Universitātes atbalstu Support for Conference Proceedings by ERAF Project Support for the international cooperation projects and other international cooperation activities in research and technology at the University of Latvia No. 2010/0202/2DP/2.1.1.2.0/10/APIA/VIAA/013 IEGULDĪJUMS TAVĀ NĀKOTNĒ Editorial board: Gunnar de Boel (Belgium) Igor Surikov (Russia) Thanassis Agathos (Greece) Kateřina Loudová (The Czech Republic) Valda Čakare (Latvia) Ojārs Lāms (Latvia) Ilze Rūmniece (Latvia) Nijolė Juchnevičienė (Lithuania) Tudor Dinu (Romania) Language editing Normunds Titāns Translating Rasma Mozere Cover design: Agris Dzilna Layout: Andra Liepiņa © Brigita Aleksejeva, Ojārs Lāms, Ilze Rūmniece, editors, 2012 © University of Latvia, 2012 ISBN 978-9984-45-469-6 CONTENTS / SATURS Introduction 8 Ievads 10 I ANCIENT TIMES SENLAIKI 11 Vassilis Patronis ECONOMIC IDEAS OF ANCIENT GREEK PHILOSOPHERS: ASSESSING THEIR IMPACT ON THE FORMATION OF THE WORLD ECONOMIC THOUGHT 12 Sengrieķu filozofu idejas par ekonomiku: izvērtējot ietekmi uz pasaules ekonomiskās domas veidošanos Nijolė Juchnevičienė HISTORIOGRAPHIC SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE AND THE TRADITION OF GEOGRAPHY 22 Zinātniski historiogrāfiskais diskurss un ģeogrāfijas tradīcija Igor E.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz's Monads Vis-À-Vis the Immortality of the Soul
    LEIBNIZ’S MONADS VIS-À-VIS THE IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH George Franklin Umeh* Abstract Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz published little during his lifetime, and his philosophical masterpiece, Monadology is such a triumph of succinct expression that, to fully interpret it, one must look at many other works and to his correspondence, in order to know the detailed arguments which underlie its conclusions. Leibniz raised a problem in his attempt to compare his monads with the human soul, sharing the same features of immortality. Philosophers are divided in this idea, while some refute it as illogical, some still accept it though with a pinch of salt, saying that he is not the originator of the idea. However, I salute his courage for taken such a bold step in making this delicate comparison of the monads and souls’ immortality. It is also worthy of note that more philosophers have written on the immortality of the soul but the most classical of them all is that of Thomas Aquinas. The importance of this work is to help us understand the deep relationship between the monads and the human souls. To achieve this, the method of comparative analysis of the ideas is going to be used, giving it an interpretation to discover the strength of Leibniz’s argument and his flaws. Solution to the flaws will be proffered. Keywords: Monads, Soul, Immortality, Substance Introduction Interpretation of Leibniz is made doubly difficult by the fact that he changed his mind about certain of his most influential ideas during the course of his lifetime, while remaining obstinately attached to them and unable overtly to reject them.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Western Canon Good For?
    What is the Western Canon Good For? Adam Kotsko AM IN THE MIDST OF MY SIXTH YEAR OF TEACHING AT SHIMER COLLEGE, A SMALL LIBERAL arts school in the Great Books tradition. This tradition, which began in the I early 20th century in response to the perception that higher education was becoming too specialised, starts from the premise that every college student should engage with primary texts of enduring importance. A Great Books education is a broadly humanistic one, aimed at inducting students into the ‘Great Conversation’. In many ways, it is a very optimistic pedagogical model, throwing students into the deep end without textbooks or background lectures, on the assumption that nothing human is foreign to them. Hence they will be able to make at least some productive headway with exemplary products of human thought. It has also tended to be a deeply conservative pedagogical model, reifying the ‘canon’ of the Western Tradition—the intellectual trajectory that postcolonial theorists have lampooned as stretching ‘from Plato to NATO’. The best-known Great Books school is St. John’s College, where students read great texts from the Greeks forward, in chronological order, meaning that they do not encounter a single text by a woman until late in their career. A colleague of mine calls Shimer’s program ‘Reformed Great Books’, meaning that we make room for more contemporary and diverse texts in our curriculum. © Australian Humanities Review 60 (November 2016). ISSN: 1325 8338 157-61 158 Adam Kotsko / What is the Western Canon Good For? Unlike the St. John’s program, the Shimer curriculum is divided into three broad disciplines—Humanities, Natural Sciences, and Social Sciences—and does not necessarily proceed in chronological order, even within a single course.
    [Show full text]
  • 200Th Anniversary of the Greek War of Independence 1821-2021 18 1821-2021
    Special Edition: 200th Anniversary of the Greek War of Independence 1821-2021 18 1821-2021 A publication of the Dean C. and Zoë S. Pappas Interdisciplinary March 2021 VOLUME 1 ISSUE NO. 3 Center for Hellenic Studies and the Friends of Hellenic Studies From the Director Dear Friends, On March 25, 1821, in the city of Kalamata in the southern Peloponnesos, the chieftains from the region of Mani convened the Messinian Senate of Kalamata to issue a revolutionary proclamation for “Liberty.” The commander Petrobey Mavromichalis then wrote the following appeal to the Americans: “Citizens of the United States of America!…Having formed the resolution to live or die for freedom, we are drawn toward you by a just sympathy; since it is in your land that Liberty has fixed her abode, and by you that she is prized as by our fathers.” He added, “It is for you, citizens of America, to crown this glory, in aiding us to purge Greece from the barbarians, who for four hundred years have polluted the soil.” The Greek revolutionaries understood themselves as part of a universal struggle for freedom. It is this universal struggle for freedom that the Pappas Center for Hellenic Studies and Stockton University raises up and celebrates on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of the beginning of the Greek Revolution in 1821. The Pappas Center IN THIS ISSUE for Hellenic Studies and the Friends of Hellenic Studies have prepared this Special Edition of the Hellenic Voice for you to enjoy. In this Special Edition, we feature the Pappas Center exhibition, The Greek Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT BOOKS of the WESTERN WORLD a Collection of the Greatest Writings in Western History
    GREAT BOOKS OF THE WESTERN WORLD A Collection of the Greatest Writings in Western History Author/Title List by Volume: VOLUME 1 and 2 The Syntopicon This unique guide enables you to investigate a particular idea, such as courage or democracy, and compare the perspectives of different authors. VOLUME 3 Homer The Iliad The Odyssey VOLUME 4 Aeschylus (C. 525-456 BC) The Suppliant Maidens The Persians Seven Against Thebes Prometheus Bound Agamemnon The Libation Bearers The Eumenides Sophocles (C. 495-406 BC) Oedipus the King Oedipus at Colonus Antigone Ajax Electra The Women of Trachis Philoctetes GREAT BOOKS OF THE WESTERN WORLD 1 VOLUME 4 (cont.) Euripides (C. 480-406 BC) Rhesus The Medea Hippolytus Alcestis The Heracleidae The Suppliant Women The Trojan Women Ion Helen Andromache Electra The Bacchae Hecuba Heracles The Phoenician Women Orestes Iphigenia in Tauris Iphigenia in Aulis The Cyclops Aristophanes (C. 455-380 BC) The Acharnians The Knights The Clouds The Wasps Peace The Birds The Frogs Lysistrata The Poet and the Women The Assemblywomen Wealth VOLUME 5 Herodotus (C. 484-425 BC) The History Thucydides (C. 460-400 BC) The History of the Peloponnesian War GREAT BOOKS OF THE WESTERN WORLD 2 VOLUME 6 Plato (C. 428-348 BC) Charmides Lysis Laches Protagoras Euthydemus Cratylus Phaedrus Ion Symposium Meno Euthyphro Apology Crito Phaedo Gorgias The Republic Timaeus Critias Parmenides Theaetetus Sophist Statesman Philebus Laws The Seventh Letter VOLUME 7 Aristotle I (C. 384-322 BC) Categories On Interpretation Prior Analytics Posterior Analytics Topics On Sophistical Refutations Physics On the Heavens On Generation and Corruption Meteorology On Sense and the Reminiscence On Sleep and Sleeplessness On Dreams On Prophesying On Longevity and Shortness of Life On Youth and Old Age, On Life and Death, On Breathing VOLUME 8 GREAT BOOKS OF THE WESTERN WORLD 3 Aristotle II (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Great
    RESOURCE GUIDE Booth Library Eastern Illinois University Alexander the Great A Selected List of Resources Booth Library has a large collection of learning resources to support the study of Alexander the Great by undergraduates, graduates and faculty. These materials are held in the reference collection, the main book holdings, the journal collection and the online full-text databases. Books and journal articles from other libraries may be obtained using interlibrary loan. This is a subject guide to selected works in this field that are held by the library. The citations on this list represent only a small portion of the available literature owned by Booth Library. Additional materials can be found by searching the EIU Online Catalog. To find books, browse the shelves in these call numbers for the following subject areas: DE1 to DE100 History of the Greco-Roman World DF10 to DF951 History of Greece DF10 to DF289 Ancient Greece DF232.5 to DF233.8 Macedonian Epoch. Age of Philip. 359-336 B.C. DF234 to DF234.9 Alexander the Great, 336-323 B.C. DF235 to DF238.9 Hellenistic Period, 323-146.B.C. REFERENCE SOURCES Cambridge Companion to the Hellenistic World ………………………………………. Ref DE86 .C35 2006 Encyclopedia of the Ancient Greek World ……………………………………………… Ref DF16 .S23 1995 Who’s Who in the Greek World ……………………………………………………….. Stacks DE7.H39 2000 PLEASE REFER TO COLLECTION LOCATION GUIDE FOR LOCATION OF ALL MATERIALS ALEXANDER THE GREAT Alexander and His Successors ………………………………………………... Stacks DF234 .A44 2009x Alexander and the Hellenistic World ………………………………………………… Stacks DE83 .W43 Alexander the Conqueror: The Epic Story of the Warrior King ………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Great Books Colloquium Self-Study February 22, 2019
    Great Books Colloquium Self-Study February 22, 2019 THE INTERNAL CONTEXT Program Overview The Seaver College Great Books Colloquium comprises a four-course sequence in which students read and discuss celebrated, "classic" works of Western thought and literature. The Colloquium also includes under-represented and minority voices, particularly in Great Books IV, and Great Books V (an optional course) offers students the opportunity to study classics of the Asian tradition. Although many of the works included represent the humanities, the Colloquium is broadly interdisciplinary. The curriculum includes works of literature and philosophy, such as epics by Homer, Virgil, Dante, and Milton and philosophical treatises by Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and Nietzsche. Students also study works of religious, social, and political thought by such writers as Augustine, Machiavelli, Luther, Rousseau, Kierkegaard, and Freud. The attached brochure describes the program. ​ ​ Great Books students undertake challenging reading and writing assignments. They read full-length texts of the works in the curriculum and write several essays each term analyzing and interpreting this material. The small classes are conducted as seminars involving discussion and shared inquiry. Students are expected to participate actively in class discussions and, occasionally, to lead discussions. Both discussions and writing assignments emphasize close reading and critical thinking; students identify important 1 problems and questions, and they defend their interpretations and evaluations using textual and argumentative evidence. Rather than axiomatically accepting the texts as "great" or "classic" documents that embody artistic or epistemological perfection, students learn to examine the works critically, to query why they command enduring appeal, and to evaluate their relevance to contemporary experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Shimer Great Books School Required and Suggested Texts
    SHIMER GREAT BOOKS SCHOOL Required and Suggested Texts HUMANITIES 111: FUNDAMENTAL SUGGESTED TEXTS: SUGGESTED TEXTS: CONCEPTS OF ART AND MUSIC Enuma Elish Catherine of Siena, letters or Dialogue of Divine Providence Mahabharata REQUIRED TEXTS: al-Ghazali, Deliverance from Error Joshua C. Taylor, Learning to Look 1001 Arabian Nights Maimonides, Guide for the Perplexed (selections) Alberti, On Painting Murasaki Shikibu, The Tale of Genji Upanishads Josef Albers, Interactions of Color Sophocles, Oedipus at Colonus Bhagavad Gita Svetlana Alpers, Vexations of Art Other works of premodern literature from various Confucius, Analects world traditions Susanne Langer, Feeling and Form HUMANITIES 212: PHILOSOPHICAL Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters on Cézanne HUMANITIES 113: LITERATURE IN REASONING THE MODERN WORLD REQUIRED ARTWORKS AND MUSICAL REQUIRED TEXTS: PIECES: REQUIRED TEXTS: Plato, Apology, Phaedo, Phaedrus Renaissance paintings illustrating the use of Shakespeare, Hamlet, Othello or King Lear (if Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics perspective choosing Hamlet, Grammaticus’s Amleth may Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy Paintings by Cézanne and at least one be used) Locke, Essay on Human Understanding, or Hume, Impressionist Selections from Norton Anthology of Poetry Dialogues on Natural Religion Velazquez, Las Meninas At least one of the following major novels: Austen, Kant, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Bach, Goldberg Variations (Glenn Gould recording) Pride and Prejudice or Emma; Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, “On the Prejudices of the Philosophers”
    [Show full text]