Exploring Standardized Nursing Languages: Moving Toward a Faith Community Nursing Intervention Deborah J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring Standardized Nursing Languages: Moving Toward a Faith Community Nursing Intervention Deborah J International Journal of Faith Community Nursing Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 2 April 2018 Exploring Standardized Nursing Languages: Moving Toward a Faith Community Nursing Intervention Deborah J. Ziebarth Herzing University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijfcn Part of the Health Information Technology Commons, and the Public Health and Community Nursing Commons Recommended Citation Ziebarth, Deborah J. (2018) "Exploring Standardized Nursing Languages: Moving Toward a Faith Community Nursing Intervention," International Journal of Faith Community Nursing: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijfcn/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Faith Community Nursing by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ziebarth: Exploring Standardized Nursing Languages Standardized Nursing Language Standardized nursing language is a "…common language, readily understood by all nurses, to describe care" (Keenan, 1999, p. 12). Standardized nursing languages are used to describe assessments, interventions, and outcomes of nursing care. One of the benefits of using a standardized nursing language is that nurses from different specialties, geographic areas, or countries use understood terminologies. Other benefits are increased visibility of nursing interventions, improved patient care, enhanced data collection to evaluate nursing care outcomes, greater adherence to standards of care, and facilitated assessment of nursing competency (Rutherford, 2008). The aim of this review is to examine three standardized nursing languages with specific interest in how faith community nursing has been described. This integrative literature review is in preparation for a research study describing transitional care interventions as implemented by faith community nurses using a standardized nursing language. Research questions are: 1. What are general descriptions, recognitions, populations, translations, reliability/validation/utility, and components of the Omaha System, the Nursing Intervention Classification, and the International Classification for Nursing Practice? 2. What standardized nursing language(s) have been used to describe the practice of faith community nursing? The standardized nursing languages examined in this integrative review of literature are the Omaha System (Martin, Elfrink, & Monsen, 2005), the Nursing Intervention Classification (Bulechek, Butcher, Dochterman, &Wagner, 2013), and the International Classification for Nursing Practice (Ruland, 2001). The Nursing Intervention Classification has two complementary parts that are often linked: North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (2005) and Nursing Outcomes Classification (Moorhead, 2006). The North American Nursing Diagnosis and Nursing Outcomes Classification will not be included as part of this work being that the focus is on nursing interventions. The Omaha System (Martin et al., 2005), the Nursing Intervention Classification (Bulechek et al., 2013) and the International Classification for Nursing Practice System (Ruland, 2001) are all recognized by the American Nurses Association (ANA) as standardized nursing languages. In addition, they are included in the Metathesaurus of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) of the US National Library of Medicine (Rutherford, 2008). History The first standardized nursing language, the North American Nursing Diagnosis (NANDA), was introduced in 1973 (North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, 1996). The ANA asserts that since then, several more languages have been developed. The Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS) was developed in 1988 (Prophet & Delaney, 1998). It was followed by the Nursing Management Minimum Data Set (NMMDS) in 1989 (Huber, Schumacher, & Delaney, 1997). The Home Health Care Classification (HHCC), also referred to as the Clinical Care Classification was developed in 1991 (Saba, Hovenga, Coenen, McCormick, & Bakken, 2003) and the Omaha System (OS) was developed in 1992 (Martin & Scheet, 1992). The Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC) was also published in 1992 (McCloskey & Bulechek, 1996b). It was followed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) (Johnson & Maas, 1998) and the Published by TopSCHOLAR®, 2018 2 International Journal of Faith Community Nursing, Vol. 4, Iss. 1 [2018], Art. 2 Patient Care Data Set (PCDS) (Hyun & Park, 2002). The International Council of Nurses developed the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) in 1993 (Clark, 1999). Evaluation and Recognition In 1992, a committee of the ANA, Nursing Practice Information Infrastructure (NPII), was formed (Rutherford, 2008). Its mission was to evaluate and recognize nursing languages using certain criteria. The language provides a rationale for its development and supports the nursing process by providing clinically useful terminology (Rutherford, 2008). In addition, there must be documentation of utility, validity, and reliability and a “…named group who will be responsible for maintaining and revising the system must exist” (Thede & Sewell, 2010, p. 293). In 1993, ANA recognized the NANDA Taxonomy (Kim, Coenen, Hardiker & Bartz, 2011) as the first standardized language for nursing. The ANA has recognized a total of thirteen standardized languages, one of which has been retired. Two of the languages are data sets, seven are nursing specific, and two are interdisciplinary (Kim et al., 2011). The Nursing Information and Data Set Evaluation Center (NIDSEC) evaluates languages used by information system vendors. These vendors use languages that support documentation on a nursing information system or computerized patient record system. The criteria used by the ANA to evaluate how standardized languages are implemented, includes (a) how the terms can be connected, (b) how easily the records can be stored and retrieved and (c) how well the security and confidentiality of the records are maintained (Rutherford, 2008). The recognition is valid for three years and a new application must be submitted for further recognition. Methodology The method chosen for this study is an integrative literature review. The integrative literature review is a distinctive form of research that generates new knowledge about a topic reviewed (Torraco, 2005). New salient knowledge emerges when literature is examined for what is known. An integrative literature review …addresses emerging topics that benefit from a holistic conceptualization and synthesis of the literature to date or to saturation. Because relatively new topics have not yet undergone a comprehensive review of the literature, the review is more likely to lead to an initial or preliminary conceptualization of the topic (Torraco, 2005, p. 357). An integrative literature review was done using the search engines available through the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, which accesses databases such as JSTOR Archival Journals, Wolters Kluwer - Ovid - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, University of Chicago Press Journals, and MEDLINE/PubMed. The keywords used for the initial search were “standardized nursing languages”. Articles were sought from the last 20 years. A total of 292 articles were found. In addition, when keywords: standardized nursing language and faith community nursing were entered, 72 articles were found. After abstracts were read, articles containing pertinent information to answer the research questions were selected. Pertinent information included general descriptions, recognitions, populations, translations, reliability/validation/utility, and components of the Omaha System (OS), the Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC), and the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP). In addition, the OS, NIC, and ICNP respective websites were visited. Websites provided general information and additional references. A total of 26 articles were selected to answer the research questions. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijfcn/vol4/iss1/2 3 Ziebarth: Exploring Standardized Nursing Languages A descriptive matrix template (Marsh, 1990) was used to conceptualize and synthesize the literature. The matrix is a spatial representation of compacted data. Column headings were OS, NIC, and ICNP. Specific data collected in the template rows included headings of general descriptions, recognitions, populations, translations, reliability/validation/utility, and components. Not every standardized nursing language had information regarding each of the row headings. In addition to the row headings of general descriptions, recognitions, populations, translations, reliability/validation/utility, and components, FCN intervention descriptions were collected in the matrix. The matrix was used to succinctly summarize the literature review that is presented in the result’s section. Results The Omaha System General description, populations, and translations. The OS is a standardized taxonomy designed to document and enhance nursing practice (Martin & Scheet, 1992). It was initially developed for multidisciplinary staff members employed in home care, public health, and school health practice settings, as well as educators (Martin & Scheet, 1992). Current users include nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech and language pathologists, social workers/counselors, physicians, registered dieticians, recreational therapists, chaplains, pharmacists, community
Recommended publications
  • A Systematic Review of Omaha System Literature in Turkey
    Nursing Informatics 2016 633 W. Sermeus et al. (Eds.) © 2016 IMIA and IOS Press. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-658-3-633 A Systematic Review of Omaha System Literature in Turkey Selda SECGİNLİ, PhD, Associate Professor a,1, Nursen O. NAHCİVAN, PhD, Professora, Karen A. MONSEN PhD, RN, FAAN b a Florence Nightingale Nursing Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey b School of Nursing, University of Minnesota and Institute for Health Informatics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA Keywords. Omaha System; Systematic review; Standardized terminology; Turkey 1. Introduction The Omaha System is a comprehensive tool for enhancing practice, documentation and information management across health care settings.1 This systematic review presents the state of science on the use of the Omaha System in practice, research, and education Turkey and to suggest areas for future research. 2. Methods A systematic review of the literature published between 2000 and 2014 was conducted, searching electronic databases of Ovid MEDLINE, PUB MED, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Google Scholar, ULAKBIM Turkish Medical Database and Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. The primary key word “Omaha System” and its Turkish translations were used for searching. Methodological quality of the reviewed research studies was evaluated with Joanna Briggs Institute MAStARI Critical Appraisal checklists for identifying methodological flaws in the studies included. Articles were included if studies were conducted in Turkey and published in either Turkish or English. All articles were read and then categorized to one of five categories: “analyzing client problems”, “clinical process”, “client outcomes”, “advanced classification research”, and “reports on unpublished master’s and doctoral dissertations”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Using Standardized Nursing Terminology
    Page 1 of 20 Selecting a Standardized Terminology for the Electronic Health Record that Reveals the Impact of Nursing on Patient Care By Cynthia B. Lundberg, R.N., BSN; SNOMED Terminology Solutions; Judith J. Warren, PhD, RN, BC, FAAN, FACMI; University of Kansas; Jane Brokel, PhD, RN, NANDA International; Gloria M. Bulechek, PhD, RN, FAAN; Nursing Interventions Classification; Howard K. Butcher, PhD, RN, APRN, BC; Nursing Interventions Classification; Joanne McCloskey Dochterman, PhD, RN, FAAN; Nursing Interventions Classification; Marion Johnson, PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification; Meridean Maas PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification; Karen S. Martin, RN, NSN, FAAN; Omaha System; Sue Moorhead PhD, RN, Nursing Outcomes Classification; Christine Spisla, RN, MSN; SNOMED Terminology Solutions; Elizabeth Swanson, PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification, Sharon Giarrizzo-Wilson, RN, BSN/MS, CNOR, Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses Citation: Lundberg, C., Warren, J.., Brokel, J., Bulechek, G., Butcher, H., McCloskey Dochterman, J., Johnson, M., Mass, M., Martin, K., Moorhead, S., Spisla, C., Swanson, E., & Giarrizzo-Wilson, S. (June, 2008). Selecting a Standardized Terminology for the Electronic Health Record that Reveals the Impact of Nursing on Patient Care. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), 12, (2). Available at http:ojni.org/12_2/lundberg.pdf Page 2 of 20 Abstract Using standardized terminology within electronic health records is critical for nurses to communicate their impact on patient care to the multidisciplinary team. The universal requirement for quality patient care, internal control, efficiency and cost containment, has made it imperative to express nursing knowledge in a meaningful way that can be shared across disciplines and care settings. The documentation of nursing care, using an electronic health record, demonstrates the impact of nursing care on patient care and validates the significance of nursing practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Nursing Terminologies: a Landscape Analysis
    Standard Nursing Terminologies: A Landscape Analysis MBL Technologies, Clinovations, Contract # GS35F0475X Task Order # HHSP2332015004726 May 15, 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 4 II. Background ........................................................................................................ 4 III. Landscape Analysis Approach ............................................................................. 6 IV. Summary of Background Data ............................................................................ 7 V. Findings.............................................................................................................. 8 A. Reference Terminologies .....................................................................................................8 1. SNOMED CT ................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) ........................................................ 10 B. Interface Terminologies .................................................................................................... 11 1. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System .................................................................................... 11 2. International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) ............................................................. 12 3. NANDA International
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Mapping the ICNP with NANDA, HHCC, Omaha System and NIC for Unified Nursing Language System Development
    Original article Cross-mapping the ICNP with NANDA, HHCC, Omaha System and NIC for unified nursing language system development S. Hyun MSN, RN & H. A. Park PhD, RN 1 Researcher, College of Nursing Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 2 Associate Professor, College of Nursing Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Keywords Abstract Cross-mapping, ICNP, Nursing language plays an important role in describing and defining nursing Nursing Languages, Unified Nursing phenomena and nursing actions. There are numerous vocabularies describing Language System nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes in nursing. However, the lack of a standardized unified nursing language is considered a problem for further development of the discipline of nursing. In an effort to unify the nursing languages, the International Council of Nurses (ICN) has proposed the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) as a unified nursing language system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inclusiveness and expressiveness of the ICNP terms by cross-mapping them with the existing nursing terminologies, specifically the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) taxonomy I, the Omaha System, the Home Health Care Classification (HHCC) and the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). Nine hundred and seventy-four terms from these four classifications were cross-mapped with the ICNP terms. This was performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Composing a Nursing Diagnosis and Guidelines for Composing a Nursing Intervention, which were suggested by the ICNP development team. An expert group verified the results. The ICNP Phenomena Classification described 87.5% of the NANDA diagnoses, 89.7% of the HHCC diagnoses and 72.7% of the Omaha System problem classification scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Report-Health Terminologies and Vocabularies Environmental Scan
    Health Terminologies and Vocabularies Environmental Scan Conducted for the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics Subcommittee on Standards September 14, 2018 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Health Terminologies and Vocabularies Environmental Scan NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards This report was written by Susan L. Roy, MS, MLS, SNOMED CT Coordinator, and Vivian A. Auld, MLIS, Senior Specialist for Health Data Standards, both with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Library of Medicine, in collaboration with the NCVHS Standards Subcommittee: NCVHS Membership William W. Stead, MD, NCVHS Chair Nicholas L. Coussoule,* Subcommittee Co-chair Alexandra Goss,* Subcommittee Co-chair Bruce B. Cohen, PhD David A. Ross, ScD Debra Strickland, MS* Denise E. Love, BSN, MBA* Jacki Monson, JD Linda L. Kloss, MA, RHIA*, Terminology and Vocabulary Project Lead Llewellyn J. Cornelius, PhD Richard W. Landen, MPH, MBA* Robert L. Phillips, Jr., MD, MSPH Roland J. Thorpe, Jr., PhD Vickie M. Mays, PhD, MSPH *Member of the Subcommittee on Standards Rebecca Hines, MHS, NCVHS Executive Secretary/DFO Health Scientist National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, HHS Rashida Dorsey, PhD, MPH, NCVHS Executive Staff Director Director, Division of Data Policy Senior Advisor on Minority Health and Health Disparities Office of Science and Data Policy Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, HHS The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) serves as the advisory committee to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) on health data, statistics, privacy, national health information policy, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) (42U.S.C.242k[k]).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Application of the Omaha System for Persons with Psychiatric/Mental
    1 Application of the Omaha System for Persons with Psychiatric/Mental Health Problems. Phyllis M. Connolly PhD, PMHCNS-BC (revised June 09). Purpose: This module provides an opportunity for you to successfully apply the Omaha System for persons who may be experiencing psychiatric/mental health problems. In addition, you will have an increased awareness of the use of the Omaha System with the School of Nursing Nurse Managed Centers. Learning Outcomes: After completing this module you will be able to: • Identify appropriate Omaha System problems during an assessment of a person with psychiatric/mental health problems. • Select the appropriate interventions and targets for the identified problems. • Correctly rate the outcomes of the problem in the areas of Knowledge (K), Behavior (B), and Status (S). • Develop a care plan for future care. • Discuss the use of the Omaha data collection within the Nurse Managed Centers. • Recognize the relationship between the use of the Omaha System and providing quality care. • Identify the protocol for data collection of the Omaha in the Nurse Managed Centers. • Document services provided on a Standardized Omaha System Documentation tool. • Collect pre and post Omaha Data on top 3 priority problems for assigned clients on a scantron form. • Discuss the value of the Omaha System for providing collaborative care. Required learning activities: 1. Purchase a copy of the Omaha Module in the Associated Students Print shop and complete the module. 2. Read the case study for a person in the community with psychiatric symptoms. 3. Based on the case study provided identify the two top priority problems, include the Domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Drawer in the Literature, from Vendors, and Through Networking
    cin20044.qxd 6/16/09 12:12 PM Page 197 ✓ ✓ NEWS Top NEWS OMAHA SYSTEM of standards, meaningful use of INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE electronic records, and partnership 2009 Drawer results were highlighted. The Omaha System International Applications of Standards Conference took place in Eagan, A standardized terminology such as MN, on April 16 to 18, 2009. Those the Omaha System is essential for attending were from Estonia, Hong documentation and information Kong, New Zealand, The Nether- management. International partici- lands, and 17 states. More than 40 pants described current initiatives representatives of practice, educa- to standardize and automate tion, research, and information tech- • healthcare documentation in their nology presented information about ESSENTIAL countries. The diverse initiatives their use of the Omaha System. They INFORMATION ON were designed to describe the recip- are employed in home care, public NEW PRODUCTS ients of service; quantify practice health, hospice, acute care, case and the outcomes of that practice; SOFTWARE management, long-term care, nurse- integrate clinical, statistical, and fi- managed centers, parish nursing, BOOKS nancial data; and communicate child care, and university settings. MEETINGS data efficiently and economically. The Conference was presented by The need for nurses and other INTERNET RESOURCES Martin Associates, and the school healthcare professionals to work as host was the University of Minnesota • partners with managers, adminis- School of Nursing (UMN-SoN). trators, system engineers, and soft- Partnership was the conference ware developers was emphasized. theme. Presentations focused on a healthcare services. The need for common goal: working in partner- data exchange and interoperability ship to improve the quality of permeated discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands' Buurtzorg Model
    The Case Study COMMONWEALTH FUND May 2015 Home Care by Self-Governing Nursing Teams: The Netherlands’ Buurtzorg Model Bradford H. Gray, Dana O. Sarnak, and Jako S. Burgers The mission of The Commonwealth Abstract The Dutch home-care provider Buurtzorg Nederland has attracted widespread Fund is to promote a high interest for its innovative use of self-governing nurse teams. Rather than relying on different performance health care system. The Fund carries out this mandate by types of personnel to provide individual services—the approach taken by most home health supporting independent research on providers—Buurtzorg expects its nurses to deliver the full range of medical and support ser- health care issues and making grants to improve health care practice and vices to clients. Buurtzorg has earned high patient and employee ratings and appears to pro- policy. Support for this research was vide high-quality home care at lower cost than other organizations. This case study reviews provided by The Commonwealth Buurtzorg’s approach and performance thus far and considers how this model of care might Fund. The views presented here are those of the authors and be adapted for the United States. not necessarily those of The Commonwealth Fund or its directors, officers, or staff. BACKGROUND Buurtzorg Nederland, a nonprofit Dutch home-care organization, has garnered international attention for delivering high-quality care at lower cost than most competing organizations through the deployment of self-governing nurse teams. For more information about this brief, When they go into a patient’s home, Buurtzorg’s nurses provide not only medical please contact: services that require nursing training but also many support services that lesser- Bradford H.
    [Show full text]
  • Review the Conference PDF Flier
    Version 3 10 2011 The Omaha System International Conference A Key to Practice, Documentation, and Information Management April 7-9, 2011 Minneapolis/St. Paul Minnesota Presented by: Martin Associates Host School: The Valley Foundation School of Nursing at SJSU We would like your help in sharing this brochure with others. We additional copies. it or request photocopy may You The Odyssey Group South, Suite 101 Avenue 300 33rd Park, MN 56387 Waite Faculty and Planners Registration Kathryn H. Bowles, RN, PhD, FAAN Karen A. Monsen, RN, PhD Omaha System International Conference April 7-9, 2011 Associate Professor, University of Pennsylvania School Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota School of of Nursing & NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Nursing, Minneapolis, MN Online registration: http://www.omahasystem.org/conferences.html Health, Philadelphia, PA Call: 1-320-828-1901 Barbara A. Mork, RN, BSN, PHN Fax: 1-320-202-1833 Victoria L.S. Britson, ARNP-BC, PhD, CNE Home Care Nurse, Chisago County Public Health Professor, Briar Cliff University Department of Nursing, Department, North Branch, MN Mail: Return the completed registration form with full payment to: Sioux City, IA Omaha System International Conference Cynthia K. O’Sullivan, RN, PhD The Odyssey Group Daryl Canham, RN, EdD, BC Associate Professor, Southern Connecticut State 300 33rd Avenue South, Suite 101 Professor, The Valley Foundation School of Nursing at University Department of Nursing, New Haven, CT Waite Park, MN 56387 SJSU, San Jose, CA Suzanne Plemmons, RN, MN, PHCNS-BC Phyllis M. Connolly, RN, PhD, PMHCNS, Community Health Director, Kitsap County Health Please register me for: BC District, Bremerton, WA Professor, The Valley Foundation School of Nursing at One-day pre-conference $135 USD ($150 if postmarked after 3/17) SJSU, San Jose, CA Beverly K.
    [Show full text]
  • Potravinarstvo® Scientific Journal for Food Industry Volume 10 481 No. 1
    Potravinarstvo® Scientific Journal for Food Industry Potravinarstvo, vol. 10, 2016, no. 1, p. 481-488 doi:10.5219/650 Received: 17 August 2016. Accepted: 11 October 2016. Available online: 16 October 2016 at www.potravinarstvo.com © 2016 Potravinarstvo. All rights reserved. ISSN 1337-0960 (online) License: CC BY 3.0 NUTRITION INTERVENTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CROHN’S DISEASE Eva Beňová, Mária Boledovičová, Erika Krištofová, Ľuboslava Pavelová ABSTRACT Crohn's disease is a chronic non-specific inflammatory bowel disease of any part of the digestive tract. The seriousness of the disease requires a multi-disciplinary approach when providing patients with secondary and tertiary care. Patients also have specific problems from the nursing perspective that require intervention of nurses, e.g. in the area of nutrition. The role of a nurse in a specific community lies in supporting public health in the field of prevention, health education, group educational activities and care of the acutely or chronically ill. The regulation tool of nursing practice when providing community care is the documented form of nursing data expressed by means of expert terminology. The Omaha System is a standardised terminology for multi-disciplinary teams providing community care. The objective of the research is to draw attention to the possibility of using standardised terminology of the Omaha System when supporting public health in patients with Crohn’s disease with nutrition problems. The research was divided into 3 stages: in the first stage we assessed the nutrition problem in 100 patients dispensarised in gastroenterology counselling centres using a form from the Omaha System. Out of these, identified 42 patients suffered from Crohn’s disease and had problems with nutrition; in the second stage we chose interventions for nutrition from the Intervention Scheme of the Omaha System: their efficiency in patients was assessed by a nurse/nutritionist in the third stage of the research when the patients came to the gastroenterology counselling centre using Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted Poster Presentations the Omaha System Conference April 2009
    Accepted Poster Presentations The Omaha System Conference April 2009 Author(s) Title Vijay K. Ramadoss, M.S USING FLOW CHART DIAGRAMS TO COMPARE Karen A. Monsen, PhD, RN RESULTS FROM DIVERSE INTERVENTION Bonnie L. Westra, PhD, RN MANAGEMENT METHODS Fang Yu, PhD, GNP-BC, RN Madeleine J. Kerr, PhD, RN University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA Julie Burns, MS, PHN, Public Health Nursing USING THE OMAHA SYSTEM TO EVALUATE Supervisor, St. Louis County Public Health & MINNESOTA’S FAMILY HOME VISITING Human Services, Virginia, MN, USA PROGRAM Marilyn Deling, BSN, RN, PHN, Public Health Nursing Manager, Olmsted County Public Health, Rochester MN, USA Minnesota Omaha System Users Group (omahasystemmn.org) Joni Geppert, MPH, RD, LN, Epidemiologist Senior, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, USA Karen Monsen, PhD, RN, Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Karen A. Monsen, PhD, RN DISSEMINATING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota, FOR ASTHMA CARE AT THE INDIVIDUAL AND Minneapolis, MN, USA COMMUNITY LEVELS USING THE OMAHA Madeleine J. Kerr, PhD, RN SYSTEM Associate Professor, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Erica Fishman, MSW, MPH Asthma Program Coordinator, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, USA Meghan B. LaVelle, BSN, RN, CEN Staff RN, Woodwinds Health Campus, Woodbury, MN, USA Graduate student, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Diane C. Cassady, BSN, RN, CEN Staff Nurse, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA Graduate student, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Julie A. Kilpatrick, BSN, RN PHN II, Washington County Public Health and Environment, Stillwater, MN, USA Debby Lee, BSN, RN PHN II, Washington County Public Health and Environment, Stillwater, MN, USA Emily K.
    [Show full text]
  • Omaha System Excellence Awards 2015
    Omaha System Excellence Awards 2015 The biannual awards for meaningful and continued contributions to the Omaha System in Practice, Education, and Research were presented at the April 2015 Omaha System International Conference. An Excellence in Practice award was presented to Nicole Koster, Physiotherapist, MS-Public Health, The Netherlands. Nicole is employed at Ecare, the first company in The Netherlands to develop Omaha System software. She is a PhD candidate at the University of Twente. She is co- founder of and a member of the Board of Directors at the Omaha System Support Europe Foundation, which focuses on European users of the Omaha System. For the last four years, Nicole has been the driving force to implement software for an electronic health record based on the Omaha System at Buurtzorg Nederland, a national homecare organization. She is currently analyzing Omaha System-based health informatics for insurance companies, which would enable them to contract with healthcare organizations based on measured outcomes. Nicole is a well-known speaker and author about the Omaha System. She wrote the first official publication of the Dutch translation of the Omaha System, enabling Dutch health care professionals and software firms to access the Omaha System. A posthumous Excellence in Practice award was presented to Judith G. Riemer, RN, PHN, CNS, MS. Judith received her BSN from UCLA School of Nursing, Riverside, California. She was a co- chair of the Omaha System International Conferences from 2008-2013 and served on the Omaha System Board of Directors from 2009-2015. The Omaha System practice community is indebted to Judith for years of service that advanced practice quality and the use of the Omaha System in California and the United States.
    [Show full text]