DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Virginia Regional Commission 2020 Only Rain NVRC Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northern Virginia Regional Commission 2020 Only Rain NVRC Survey Jessica Lassetter From: Alexandria eNews <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 1:30 PM To: Jessica Lassetter Subject: Observing Chesapeake Bay Awareness Week (June 6-14) Observing Chesapeake Bay Awareness Week (June 6-14) During the annual observance of Chesapeake Bay Awareness Week (June 6-14), Virginians are encouraged to participate in events, activities, and educational programs that increase awareness of the importance of the Chesapeake Bay in their communities. The annual Clean the Bay Day event is cancelled this year, due to COVID-19; the City anticipates scheduling watershed cleanup events as soon as it becomes safe to do so. Still, there are many things you can do to increase awareness of the importance of the Bay this week while following physical distancing guidance. Below is a list of things of some things you can do to help protect the Chesapeake Bay: Know how much fertilizer to use and don’t over fertilize. Or better yet, don’t fertilize at all if it isn’t necessary! Never fertilize or use pesticides if it is going to rain within 24 hours. Fertilizers and pesticides can end up in streams and harm aquatic life. Plant a native tree. Trees use nutrients and can prevent those nutrients from entering our streams. Their roots also hold the soil in place, which helps prevent erosion. Landscape your yard using plants that are native to Alexandria. These plants are adapted to local conditions and, if planted in the right place, need less water and other care. Native plants also support butterflies, birds, bees, and other pollinators. Need ideas of what native plants are right for your yard? Visit plantnovanatives.org to learn more. Use native plants in your rain garden. This helps provide food and shelter for butterflies, bees, and birds. Please visit the City’s stormwater management BMP page for more information, including recorded webinars, about selecting the right BMP for your yard. Pick up after your dog. Pet waste left on the ground gets washed into storm drains or streams by rain. Remember to place the bagged waste in a trash can. Keep our city litter free. Any litter you drop in the street, on the sidewalk, or in a park will likely end up in a local stream and eventually the Chesapeake Bay. Besides looking bad, it harms the environment and wildlife. Report spills in our waterways. If you have any concerns about illicit or illegal discharges originating from improper disposal of items, spills, land disturbing activities, or other potential stormwater pollution concerns, or if you suspect a problem or notice something suspicious (water that is an unusual color, is cloudy, and/or has a strong smell) use Alex311 to report it to the City. Check out the Youth Field Guide and Journal. This resource is available on the City’s "What You Can Do to Protect Water Quality" web page at alexandriava.gov/93347. Educate your family, friends, and neighbors about the importance of protecting our local water resources, the Potomac River, and the Chesapeake Bay. 1 Visit alexandriava.gov/CleanWaterways to find out more about what the City is doing to help protect the Chesapeake Bay, the Potomac River, and our local streams. You are subscribed to the free Alexandria eNews service. Replies to this message will not be received. For correspondence, please use the contact information in the body of the message. To change your subscription choices or unsubscribe from an individual subscription topic, click here to login. To stop receiving all emails from Alexandria eNews, click here to completely unsubscribe. 2 Jessica Lassetter From: Alexandria eNews <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:33 AM To: Sarah Godfrey Subject: Strawberry Run Stream Restoration Project Public Information Meeting Eco-City Alexandria Clean Waterways: Helping Protect Local Waterways and the Chesapeake Bay Strawberry Run Stream Restoration Project Public Information Meeting Monday, November 4 from 7 to 8 p.m. Douglas MacArthur Elementary School (1101 Janneys Ln.) On Monday, November 4, from 7 to 8 p.m., the City of Alexandria will host a community meeting in the Douglas MacArthur Elementary School library (1101 Janneys Ln, Alexandria, VA 22302 to discuss the Strawberry Run Stream Restoration project. The meeting will include a presentation by the Department of Project Implementation (DPI) and Transportation & Environmental Services (T&ES), followed by a question and answer session. Members of the public interested in learning more about this project are encouraged to attend. The Strawberry Run Stream Restoration project includes approximately 900 linear feet of stream north of Duke Street starting at the pedestrian bridge and continuing north to the culvert under Fort Williams Parkway. Ongoing erosion along the stream banks is impacting the stream ecology, deteriorating water quality, and threatening existing infrastructure. In keeping with the its dedication to improve water quality in our local streams and the Chesapeake Bay, this restoration proposes use environmentally conscious engineering practices that mimic nature to reconstruct stream banks, encourage native plant growth, improve stream ecology, and moderate/diminish the impact of streamflow during high-precipitation events. The project's main goals include returning Strawberry Run to a more stable condition and restoring the area as an amenity for all to enjoy. To help finance project design and construction, the City received a $800,000 matching grant through the state’s Stormwater Local Assistance Fund (SLAF). The City’s matching amount will be funded through the City’s Stormwater Utility Fee. State and federal mandates require the City to reduce pollution from urban stormwater runoff that enters our local waterways, the Potomac River, and the Chesapeake Bay. In the City’s Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Action Plan, urban stream restoration is identified as an essential pollution reduction strategy for cleaning up the Bay and as part of the Eco-City Alexandria Clean Waterways program. For questions or additional information, contact DPI at 703.746.4045 or T&ES Stormwater Management at 703.746.6499. For additional information about the project, visit the project web page. You are subscribed to the free Alexandria eNews service. Replies to this message will not be received. For correspondence, please use the contact information in the body of the message. To change your subscription choices or unsubscribe from an individual subscription topic, click here to login. To stop receiving all emails from Alexandria eNews, click here to completely unsubscribe. 1 Jessica Lassetter From: Alexandria eNews <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 9:30 AM To: Sarah Godfrey Subject: REMINDER: Two Weeks Left to Apply for Stormwater Utility Fee Credits Two Weeks Left to Apply for Stormwater Utility Fee Credits The annual credit application window closes Sunday, February 16, 2020 at midnight. Did you uphold last year’s no fertilizer pledge? Visit alexandriava.gov/Stormwater and apply for credit off your 2020 Stormwater Utility Fees today! Healthy lawns with dense vegetation reduce the chance of nutrient and soil runoff to our waterways. On the flip side, gardeners frequently fertilize too much or too many times. Misapplied fertilizer will wash into streams and waterways and encourage unwanted plant and algae growth in the water. Do you need to fertilize in 2020? Can you pledge to maintain a dense cover of grass or conservation landscaping without using any fertilizers? The best way to tell is to test your soil. Visit soiltest.vt.edu to learn how. You are subscribed to the free Alexandria eNews service. Replies to this message will not be received. For correspondence, please use the contact information in the body of the message. To change your subscription choices or unsubscribe from an individual subscription topic, click here to login. To stop receiving all emails from Alexandria eNews, click here to completely unsubscribe. 1 Created by JLassetterStormwater Powered by MS4 Annual Report PY2 Social Media Examples 22 Items Alexandria T&ES @AlexandriaVATES Great video that talks about how clean water gets to you and what happens when water leaves your home (wastewater). There are 3 entities involved in that process and a 4th if you include the role public can play in keeping waterways clean. Check it out! Alexandria Renew @AlexandriaRenew Water touches everything we do our community. AlexRenew is proud to be a part of One Water Alexandria, with @AlexandriaVAGov & @vaamwater. Providing this critical public health need couldn't be done without the tireless work of our region’s water workers! youtube.com/watch?v=XupJaY… 9:14 PM · Jun 29, 2020 3 See Alexandria T&ES’s other Tweets Alexandria T&ES @AlexandriaVATES RT @NOVA_CWP: Make our clean stream dreams a reality by helping us reduce polluted water runoff. Learn More: bit.ly/2XzwAwH #OnlyR… Home | Clean Water Partners onlyrain.org 2:21 PM · Jun 15, 2020 See Alexandria T&ES’s other Tweets Alexandria T&ES @AlexandriaVATES RT @chesbayprogram: The Chesapeake Bay watershed includes 206 counties covering parts of six states and D.C. Each local community plays a p… 2:18 PM · Jun 15, 2020 See Alexandria T&ES’s other Tweets Alexandria T&ES @AlexandriaVATES Keep our city litter free. Litter dropped in the street, on the sidewalk, or in a park will likely end up in a local stream & eventually the Chesapeake Bay. Looks bad and harms the environment and wildlife. #ChesapeakeBayWeek #BayAwarenessWeek #OneChesapeake #BayInYourBackyard 6:47 PM · Jun 12, 2020 4 See Alexandria T&ES’s other Tweets Alexandria T&ES @AlexandriaVATES Report potential stormwater pollution, someone discharging something illegal, a waterway that is an unusual color, is cloudy, and/or has a strong smell to the City via Alex311: alexandriava.gov/Alex311 Learn about illegal discharges: alexandriava.gov/93348 #BayInYourBackyard 8:35 PM · Jun 11, 2020 1 See Alexandria T&ES’s other Tweets Alexandria T&ES @AlexandriaVATES Pick up after your dog every time, not just during Chesapeake #BayAwarenessWeek.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Seven Dirty Words You Should Be Allowed to Say on Television
    Washington University Law Review Volume 92 Issue 5 2015 The Seven Dirty Words You Should Be Allowed to Say on Television Ellen Alexandra Eichner Washington University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Ellen Alexandra Eichner, The Seven Dirty Words You Should Be Allowed to Say on Television, 92 WASH. U. L. REV. 1353 (2015). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol92/iss5/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SEVEN DIRTY WORDS YOU SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SAY ON TELEVISION I. INTRODUCTION Shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.1 For any American who has turned on his or her television since 1978 and tuned into one of the traditional broadcast networks—ABC, NBC, CBS, or Fox—these seven words have been conspicuously absent from broadcasting. Confusingly, with a flip of the remote over to a premium cable television station, these seven words may all occur in quick succession on one television show.2 When one of them does happen to make it to air on a broadcast network, it often becomes the source of an astronomical fine from the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and years of litigation between the network and the federal government.3 A recent case resulted in a huge victory for broadcasters.
    [Show full text]
  • “Quality TV”: the Reinvention of U.S. Television
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship “Quality TV”: The reinvention of U.S. television Sean Fuller October 2013 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree Bachelor Arts (Honours) in the Department of Gender and Cultural Studies, The University of Sydney Table of Contents Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Introduction 1 1. Television and Cultural Value 8 2. Transforming Television Production 23 3. Serious Television and Genre Hybridity 38 Works Cited 51 ii Abstract “Quality TV”: The reinvention of U.S. television This thesis examines the rise to prominence of a new form of “quality television” that has appeared in the U.S. since the 1990s. There are competing and sometimes conflicting ways to define “quality television”, depending on different histories and prioritising different characteristics - sometimes production methods, sometimes viewing and distribution practices, and sometimes genre hybridity and transformation. For each, however, the 1990s is a watershed decade. The mainstreaming of cable television, the new dominance of video and then DVD collections of series, a decline in broadcast television’s audience share and the rapid expansion of the internet as an entertainment media option together created new opportunities for a more ‘cinematic’ television that hailed an active audience interested in formally and narratively challenging television. Every account of quality television turns on claims to exceed and subvert the expectations of existing television formats and genres while also using those to attract an audience. This is famously exemplified by the 90s HBO slogan “It’s not TV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Watershed: Providing a Safe Viewing Zone
    THE WATERSHED: PROVIDING A SAFE VIEWING ZONE REPORT BY GILLIAN RAMSAY The Watershed: Providing a Safe Viewing Zone Gillian Ramsay Acknowledgements Kam Atwal for analysis of BARB data Kathy Lines and Vivien Marles from the Fuse Group The British Broadcasting Corporation The Broadcasting Standards Commission The Independent Television Commission October 2003 ISBN: 0-9544055-2-8 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 BACKGROUND 8 OBJECTIVES 11 METHODOLOGY 12 SECTION 1: 13 AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WATERSHED AWARENESS OF THE WATERSHED 13 WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE WATERSHED? 14 WHEN DOES THE WATERSHED APPLY? 16 WHO DETERMINES THE WATERSHED? 16 IS THE WATERSHED MANDATORY OR VOLUNTARY? 17 THE SCOPE OF THE WATERSHED: CHANNELS & PROGRAMMES 17 SECTION 2: 21 HOW USEFUL DO PEOPLE FIND THE WATERSHED? THE WATERSHED AS A GUIDE FOR VIEWING 21 VIEWING WITH OTHERS 22 REGULATING CHILDREN’S VIEWING 22 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE WATERSHED 33 IS THE WATERSHED WORKING? 35 DOES THE WATERSHED NEED TO CHANGE? 36 3 THE WATERSHED SECTION 3: 37 AUDIENCE EXPECTATIONS ABOUT THE WATERSHED PROGRESSION OF CONTENT 37 PROGRAMMES WHICH STRADDLE THE WATERSHED 38 EXPECTATIONS OF CONTENT: PROGRAMME GENRES 38 VIEWER SENSITIVITY TO NUDITY, SEXUAL CONTENT, VIOLENCE AND LANGUAGE 42 NUDITY AND SEXUAL CONTENT 43 VIOLENCE 48 LANGUAGE 52 ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL TRAILERS 56 SUMMARY OF ACCEPTABLE CONTENT BY TIMESLOT 58 SECTION 4: 60 APPLICATION OF THE WATERSHED IN A MULTIMEDIA ENVIRONMENT REGULATING TELEVISION IN A MULTIMEDIA WORLD 60 PREFERRED CONTROL MECHANISMS AND INFORMATION REGARDING PROGRAMME CONTENT 63 USE OF PERSONAL VIDEO RECORDERS 66 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A: COMMUNICATIONS BILL 67 APPENDIX B: DETAILS OF METHODOLOGY 67 APPENDIX C: DETAILS OF STIMULUS MATERIAL 70 APPENDIX D: TABLES SHOWING ATTITUDE TOWARDS DIFFERENT TYPES OF CONTENT 72 THE WATERSHED 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A series of 18 Workshops explored people’s awareness and understanding of the watershed on television and how useful they found it to be in the current media environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Tables on the Protection of Minors in Audiovisual Media Services
    Comparative tables on the protection of minors in audiovisual media services 0 COMPARATIVE TABLES ON THE PROTECTION OF MINORS IN AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICES IRIS bonus 2015-1 Comparative tables on the protection of minors in audiovisual media services European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg 2015 Director of publication - Susanne Nikoltchev, Executive Director Editorial supervision - Maja Cappello, Head of Department for Legal Information European Audiovisual Observatory Author Sophie Valais European Audiovisual Observatory Editorial assistant - Michelle Ganter Marketing - Markus Booms, [email protected] Press and Public Relations - Alison Hindhaugh, [email protected] European Audiovisual Observatory Publisher European Audiovisual Observatory 76, allée de la Robertsau F-67000 STRASBOURG http://www.obs.coe.int Tel. : +33 (0)3 90 21 60 00 Fax : +33 (0)3 90 21 60 19 [email protected] Cover layout - P O I N T I L L É S, Hoenheim, France Please quote this publication as Valais S., Comparative tables on the protection of minors in audiovisual media services, IRIS bonus 2015-1, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2015 © European Audiovisual Observatory (Council of Europe), Strasbourg, 2015 Opinions expressed in this publication are personal and do not necessarily represent the views of the Observatory, its members or the Council of Europe. COMPARATIVE TABLES ON THE PROTECTION OF MINORS IN AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICES Foreword Conceived as a tool for our workshop on “Empowering users: Rating Systems, Protection Tools and Media Literacy across Europe” organised in Strasbourg jointly with the European Platform of Regulatory Authorities (EPRA) in December 2014, these comparative tables aim at giving an overview of the existing obligations across the 28 EU member states with regard to the protection of minors in audiovisual media services and to watershed periods in broadcasting services.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation with Young People on the Proposed Ofcom Broadcasting Code
    Consultation with Young People on the Proposed Ofcom Broadcasting Code A research consultation with under 18s Research study carried out by The Dream Mill on behalf of Ofcom Date issued: September 2005 Contents Section Page 1 Background 1 2 Summary of the research findings 3 3 Research objectives 8 4 Research methodology 9 5 Main research findings 11 Introduction to research findings 11 Broadcast context 12 Smoking 18 Alcohol 23 Drugs 26 Violence 30 Sex 34 Paranormal 38 Religion 42 Additional specific questions 44 6 Conclusions 47 Annex 1 Further quotations from participants about each 49 consultation topic A research consultation with under 18’s Section 1 Background As the regulator for the UK communications industries, with responsibilities for television, radio, telecommunications and wireless communications services, Ofcom replaces the Broadcasting Standards Commission (BSC), the Independent Television Commission (ITC) and the Radio Authority (RA). Section 319 (1) of the Communications Act 2003 (“The Act”) requires Ofcom to set a Code which contains standards for the content of television and radio services. The Ofcom Broadcasting Code, took effect on 25 July 20051. The Code, with certain exceptions in the case of the BBC (Sections Five, Six, Nine and Ten) and S4C (part of Section Six), applies to all broadcasters regulated by Ofcom. The new Code replaces the BSC Code on Fairness and Privacy; the BSC Code on Standards; the ITC Programme Code; the ITC Code of Programme Sponsorship; the RA News and Current Affairs Code and Programme Code; and the sponsorship rules contained in the RA Advertising and Sponsorship Code. The Code applies to all television programmes, radio programming and sponsorship on broadcast services regulated by Ofcom.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday Morning Grid 1/11/15 Latimes.Com/Tv Times
    SUNDAY MORNING GRID 1/11/15 LATIMES.COM/TV TIMES 7 am 7:30 8 am 8:30 9 am 9:30 10 am 10:30 11 am 11:30 12 pm 12:30 2 CBS CBS News Sunday Face the Nation (N) Paid Program Dr. Chris College Basketball Duke at North Carolina State. (N) Å 4 NBC News (N) Å Meet the Press (N) Å News (N) On Money Skiing PGA Tour PGA Tour Golf 5 CW News (N) Å In Touch Hour of Power (N) (TVG) Paid Program 7 ABC News (N) Å This Week News (N) News (N) News Å Paid Eye on L.A. Paid 9 KCAL News (N) Joel Osteen Mike Webb Paid Woodlands Paid Program 11 FOX Paid Joel Osteen Fox News Sunday FOX NFL Sunday (N) Football NFC Divisional Playoff Dallas Cowboys at Green Bay Packers. (N) 13 MyNet Paid Program Employee of the Month 18 KSCI Paid Program Church Faith Paid Program 22 KWHY Como Local Jesucristo Local Local Gebel Local Local Local Local Transfor. Transfor. 24 KVCR Painting Dewberry Joy of Paint Wyland’s Paint This Painting Kitchen Mexico Cooking Chefs Life Simply Ming Ciao Italia 28 KCET Raggs Space Travel-Kids Biz Kid$ News Asia Biz Special (TVG) 30 ION Jeremiah Youssef In Touch Bucket-Dino Bucket-Dino Doki (TVY7) Doki (TVY7) Dive, Olly Dive, Olly Revenge of the Nerds 34 KMEX Paid Program República Deportiva (TVG) Pablo Montero Hotel Todo Al Punto (N) 40 KTBN Walk in the Win Walk Prince Redemption Liberate In Touch PowerPoint It Is Written B.
    [Show full text]
  • Content Analysis of Tobacco Content in UK Television Alexander B Barker,1 Kathy Whittamore,1 John Britton,1 Jo Cranwell2
    Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054427 on 13 August 2018. Downloaded from Content analysis of tobacco content in UK television Alexander B Barker,1 Kathy Whittamore,1 John Britton,1 Jo Cranwell2 1Division of Epidemiology and ABStract Communications (OfCom) Broadcasting Code10 Public Health, UK Centre for Aims Exposure to audiovisual tobacco content in (Section 1.10). Since 2005,11 the OfCom Broad- Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, casting Code has protected under-18s by restricting University of Nottingham, media is a risk factor for smoking in young people. Nottingham, UK While tobacco content in films has been extensively depictions of tobacco use in programmes made 2Tobacco Control Research documented, content in mainstream television has for children and preventing the glamorisation of Group, Department for Health, received relatively little attention. We report an analysis smoking in programmes broadcast before the 21:00 University of Bath, 1 W 5.124, of tobacco content in a sample of UK free-to-air prime- watershed (the time when TV programmes which Claverton Down, Bath, UK time television broadcasts in 2015, and compare this might be unsuitable for children can be broad- cast12), or in programmes likely to be widely seen, Correspondence to with a similar analysis from 2010. Dr Alexander B Barker, Division Design Content analysis of all programmes and heard or accessed by under-18s without editorial of Epidemiology and Public advertisements or trailers broadcast on the five national justification. However, 13% of 4–15 year-olds in Health, UK Centre for Tobacco UK free-to-air channels in the UK between 18:00 and the UK view programmes after the 21:00 water- and Alcohol Studies, University 22:00 during three separate weeks in September, shed13 when programmes unsuitable for children of Nottingham, Nottingham 12 NG5 1PB, UK; October and November 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Imagery on Prime Time UK Television Ailsa Lyons,1 Ann Mcneill,2 John Britton1
    Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050650 on 11 March 2013. Downloaded from Tobacco imagery on prime time UK television Ailsa Lyons,1 Ann McNeill,2 John Britton1 1UK Centre for Tobacco ABSTRACT according to recent reports. However the only Control Studies/Division of Background Smoking in films is a common and well recent study of UK television content is an analysis Epidemiology and Public – Health, School of Community documented cause of youth smoking experimentation of the 10 most popular programmes among 10 Health Sciences, University of and uptake and hence a significant health hazard. The 15-year-olds, carried out in 2005, which reported Nottingham, City Hospital, extent of exposure of young people to tobacco imagery low levels of smoking content.18 The extent to Nottingham, UK 2 in television programming has to date been far less which children are exposed to tobacco content UK Centre for Tobacco investigated. We have therefore measured the extent to across the full range of programmes broadcast on Control Studies/Addictions fi Department, Institute of which tobacco content occurs in prime time UK television, including feature lms, is unknown. Psychiatry, King’s College television, and estimated exposure of UK youth. Tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship, London, London, SE58AF, UK Methods The occurrence of tobacco, categorised as including all television advertising and paid actual tobacco use, implied tobacco use, tobacco product placement, is now prohibited in the UK by Correspondence to paraphernalia, other reference to tobacco, tobacco brand the 2002 Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Dr Ailsa Lyons, Division of 19 Epidemiology and Public appearances or any of these, occurring in all prime time Act.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FCC's NEW INDECENCY ENFORCEMENT POLICY and ITS EUROPEAN COUNTERPARTS: a CAUTIONARY TALE
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 2005 The CF C's New Indecency Enforcement Policy and Its European Counterparts: A Cautionary Tale Michael Botein New York Law School, [email protected] Adamski Dariusz Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Part of the Communications Law Commons Recommended Citation 15 Media L. & Pol'y 7 (2005-2006) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. MEDIA LAW & POLICY FALL 2005,15 MEDIA L. & POL'y THE FCC's NEW INDECENCY ENFORCEMENT POLICY AND ITS EUROPEAN COUNTERPARTS: A CAUTIONARY TALE by Michael Botein * and Dariusz Adamski * INTRODUCTION The beginning of 2004 saw an upsurge in the number of complaints filed at the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") against allegedly "indecent" broadcasting. 9 The FCC reported III complaints in 2000, 346 in 2002, 13,922 in 2003, and 1,068,802 in 2004. 10 Although one of the recurring subplots in this area is the possibility that the agency adjusted its reporting methodology to support its enforcement policy-a sort of legal, governmental version of "cooking the books" as in the Enron and WorldCom situations­ the numbers have at least facial validity. Equally unclear are the reasons behind this 10,000-fold increase in the number of complaints over a four-year period. Have North Americans finally shown their latent Puritanism and become ready to clean up their acts - an hypothesis hardly consistent with the high ratings of potboilers like * Distinguished Visiting University Professor, Southern Illinois University, 2005-06.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure and Dynamics of Global Multi-Media Business Networks
    International Journal of Communication 2 (2008), 707-748 1932-8036/20080707 The Structure and Dynamics of Global Multi-Media Business Networks AMELIA H. ARSENAULT MANUEL CASTELLS University of Southern California Today, the media empires of Time Warner, Disney, News Corp., Bertelsmann, CBS, NBC, and Viacom span large portions of the globe and exert considerable economic, political, and cultural power. This article presents a macro-level portrait of the networked forms of organization, production, and distribution in which the world's largest multi-national media organizations operate. First, it provides a detailed accounting of the internal structures of and the partnerships between these transnational media conglomerates. Second, it examines the production and distribution arrangements and the financial partnerships between conglomerates and regional and local media organizations. Third, it examines the role of open-ended network connections (i.e., links to parallel business, political and creative networks) in shaping this global network of media organizations. Key words: Media ownership; Media concentration; Globalization; Localization. Today, media are organized around a global network of multi-media corporations that extend from a core of diversified multi-national media organizations, to large national and regional companies, and to their local affiliates in different areas of the world. A number of scholars have documented the ramifications of media corporatization and ownership concentration (e.g., Bagdikian, 1983, 2000, 2004; Bennett, 2004; McChesney & Schiller, 2003; McChesney, 2007, 2008; Thussu, 2006; Hesmondhalgh, 2007). But contemporary processes of globalization, digitization, networking, and cultural differentiation of media have induced new forms of organization, production, and distribution through which these multi-national media businesses operate.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3 the Sopranos by David Thorburn
    From The Essential HBO Reader, ed. Gary Edgerton and Jeff Jones. Forthcoming, 2007, University of Kentucky Press CHAPTER 3 The Sopranos by David Thorburn 1 The signature program of the post-broadcast era, The Sopranos debuted on HBO in January 1999 and became the first cable series to achieve larger audience ratings than its broadcast competition. The series also received unprecedented critical acclaim in both popular and elite circles. Even intellectuals who had previously disdained television hailed the show as a ground-breaking work of art. One measure of the program's unique status as a cultural icon was the screening of the entire run of its first two seasons at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City, the featured item in a retrospective of gangster movies chosen by David Chase, The Sopranos' creator and executive producer. The show’s quality had been so widely acknowledged by the beginning of its sixth season that Nancy Franklin began her New Yorker review of another HBO series, Big Love, by expressing baffled sympathy for the makers of the new program, which had been scheduled to follow “What May Be The Greatest Television Show Ever.”1 The popularity of The Sopranos was particularly demoralizing for the broadcast networks, in decline through the 1980s and 90s owing to competition from cable and satellite subscriber networks. The show's success in the ratings against "free" network programs was decisive evidence that the mass audiences and consensus programming of the broadcast era were now historical artifacts. Although HBO's subscribers were only one-third of the total TV audience, the series was watched by an estimated 14 million viewers in 7.3 million TV homes during its third and fourth seasons, by far the largest continuing audience ever assembled by cable television.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel 4'S Queer Television
    Journal of e-Media Studies Volume 2, Issue 1, 2009 Dartmouth College From Minority to Mainstream: Channel 4’s Queer Television Natalie Edwards Since its launch in 1982, Channel 4 has operated under a remit that demands that it serves the “tastes and interests not generally catered for” by other UK broadcasters.1 Owing to a professed “commitment to diversity,” C4 has ostensibly sought, in the decades since its inception, to make provision in its programming for under-represented groups, including ethnic and sexual minorities.2 The requirements of queer audiences have been, as a result, better addressed by C4 than by any other terrestrial channel. While gay content has far from saturated its schedules, and while an inventory of the gay-themed items it has showcased since the early 1980s may, rather dispiritingly, still be produced with relative ease, C4 has at least attempted to articulate a response to the viewing needs and desires of an increasingly visible queer community, if only by acknowledging that such a community exists and should be represented in a percentage of its shows.3 In the years since its inception, the channel has allowed for greater gay, lesbian, and bisexual visibility than its terrestrial competitors in both its fictional and documentary output. Channel 4’s Brookside, conceived as a “grittier” alternative to ITV’s long-running Coronation Street, featured both the first gay character in a UK soap opera, from 1982 to 1987, and terrestrial television’s first pre-watershed lesbian kiss, in 1993. In 1989, C4 first broadcast Out on Tuesday (later simply Out), the first magazine- style program on UK television dedicated exclusively to the exploration of gay and lesbian issues, which ran until 1994 and was followed, in 1995, by Dyke TV, a mixed season of films, documentaries, and other lesbian-themed programming.
    [Show full text]