The Svalbard Global Seed Vault: Securing the Future of Agriculture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Svalbard Global Seed Vault: Securing the Future of Agriculture Embargoed for Release until 10:30 AM CET (0930 Hours GMT) on Tuesday, 26 February 2008 The Svalbard Global Seed Vault: Securing the Future of Agriculture Cary Fowler Global Crop Diversity Trust February 26, 2008 2 By Cary Fowler The Global Crop Diversity Trust February 26, 2008 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………… 4 Seeds and Food…………………………………………………………………………….. 6 Importance and Use of Crop Diversity………………………………..…….. 9 Collecting and Conserving………………………………………………….……... 11 Svalbard Global Seed Vault……………………………………..…………….…… 15 The Value of the Vault……………………………………………….……….….…. 16 Inside the Vault………………………………………………………………………...….23 Looking Forward…………………………………………………………………….……..25 Resources……………………………………………………………………………….….….27 About the Author…………………………………………………………………..……...28 4 Executive Summary This report combines the historical view Around the world, countries and and a unique moment in the story of agriculture. institutions created seed banks, also called The formal opening of the Svalbard Global Seed genebanks. Today, there are some 1400 Vault deep inside an Arctic mountain on February collections of crop diversity, ranging in size from 26, 2008 marks a turning point toward ensuring one sample to more than half a million. These the crops that sustain us will not be lost. It seed banks now house about 6.5 million samples. follows millennia of haphazard forms of About 1.5 million of these are thought to be protecting crop diversity, and decades of catch- distinct samples. And within each crop, the up preservation efforts to save more than a diversity of varieties is stunning. Experts, for million different varieties of crops. With growing instance, estimate 200,000 types of wheat, evidence that unchecked climate change could 30,000 types of corn, 47,000 types of sorghum, seriously threaten agricultural production and the and even 15,000 types of groundnut. diversity of crops around the world, the opening of the Seed Vault also Some of the more popular represents a major step varieties are widely distributed in toward finishing the job of seed banks, occurring in literally protecting the varieties now hundreds of collections, while others held in seed banks. A quiet are in just a single facility. rescue mission is underway. Information systems will eventually It will intensify in the coming aid in identifying unintended years, as thousands of duplication. About half of the stored scientists, plant breeders, samples are in developing countries, farmers, and those working and about half of all samples are of in the Global Crop Diversity cereals. Trust identify and save as many distinct crop varieties The Global Crop Diversity as possible. Trust is working with the Consultative Group on International The story of Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and agriculture dates to some seed banks from around the world to 13,000 years ago, when assist in preparing and shipping human societies began the seeds to the Seed Vault in Svalbard. transformation from hunting The Trust has assembled leading and gathering to forms of experts in all of the major crops to growing food. But the story identify priority collections. Some of systematically saving 500 scientists from around the world varieties of crops didn’t have been involved. The rescue and begin until less than 100 regeneration effort is under way, and will result years ago. In the 1920s, plant breeders assembled in a steady flow of samples being sent to Svalbard collections of seeds to breed new varieties. in coming years as the genebanks produce fresh Gradually, scientists began to sample and collect new seed. For the February 26 opening of the more generally in an attempt to assemble the Seed Vault, workers will load shipments from 21 complete diversity of each crop—before distinct seed banks, which have sent 268,000 samples varieties were lost. that contain about 100 million seeds. These scientists delved into the makeup When fully stocked, the Seed Vault will of these varieties. Plant breeders created variety contain samples deposited by large and small upon variety. Today, the documented pedigrees genebanks, by those in developed and developing of modern crop varieties are longer than those of countries as well as international institutions, by any monarchy. One type of wheat, for instance, those that have state-of-the-art facilities, and by has a pedigree that runs six meters long in small those whose facilities fall far short of type on paper, recording hundreds of crosses, international standards. They will share a using many different types of wheat from many common desire to use the Seed Vault to insure countries. A number of crops could not be against losses in their own facility. produced on a commercial scale if not for genes obtained from their botanical wild relatives and Why do they want a backup? Put simply, used in breeding programs. without the diversity represented in these collections, agriculture will fail. This diversity is 5 vital in guaranteeing a successful harvest and in as an essential element in a global network of satisfying our needs for variety. On one level, facilities that conserve crop diversity and make it consumers want diversity within crops because available for use in plant breeding and research. they need wheat for pasta and wheat for bread Its genesis lies primarily in the desire of scientists (for which they need two types of wheat), or they to protect against the all-too-common small-scale want tomatoes for eating fresh and for making loss of diversity in individual seed collections. sauce (again, two types of tomato.) On another, With a duplicate sample of each distinct variety farmers want diversity not just to supply safeguarded in the Seed Vault, seed banks can be consumer demands, but because different assured that the loss of a variety in their farming and environmental conditions require institution, or even the loss of the entire crop varieties with different characteristics. collection, will not mean the extinction of the variety or varieties and the diversity they Plant breeders help consumers and embody. farmers. They have to produce varieties that are productive and popular. This is a moving target. Svalbard, in the northern reaches of Pest and diseases evolve, the climate changes Norway, was chosen for a variety of reasons: The and so do consumer preferences, and the plant permafrost in the ground offers natural freezing breeder has to incorporate the appropriate for the seeds; the vault’s remote location characteristics into the variety he or she breeds. enhances the security of the facility; the local And so a farmer’s field, over time, is a study of infrastructure is excellent; Norway, a global change. One has to run fast just to stay in the player in many multinational efforts, is a willing same place, just to beat back the pests and host; and the area is geologically stable. diseases and other constantly evolving challenges. In the case of a large-scale regional or even global catastrophe, it is quite likely that the Three partners are overseeing the Seed Seed Vault would prove indispensable to Vault: the Nordic Gene Bank, the Norwegian humanity. Still, we need not experience Ministry of Agriculture and Food, and the Global apocalypse in order for the Seed Vault to be Crop Diversity Trust. They have a simple purpose: useful and to repay its costs thousands of times provide insurance against both incremental and over. If the Seed Vault simply re-supplies catastrophic loss of crop diversity held in genebanks with samples that those genebanks traditional seed banks around the world. The lose accidentally, it will be a grand bargain. Seed Vault offers “fail-safe” protection. It serves 6 Seeds and Food For most of human history, people have not only adapted to growing in conditions from lived through hunting and gathering. The vast South Africa to Sweden, from Mexico to China, it majority of people who have ever lived, lived by also comes in varieties for eating fresh, for such means. Agriculture is a relatively recent grinding into flour, for popcorn, for beer, for phenomenon. The slow transition from hunting making into sugar for soft drinks, and now for and agriculture began “just” 13,000 years ago or fuel for automobiles. And some special varieties so. of maize have been used in religious ceremonies and for medicinal purposes. There is a big difference between the seed of wild plants and of domesticated plants. Some crop diversity is visual. Potatoes Wild plants are engineered to scatter their seeds come in an array of colors, for example. They can widely. They “shatter,” to use a biological term. be white, red, black, blue, purple, or yellow- Our early hunting and gathering ancestors, fleshed. But different varieties or types have however, would have found it easier and more hidden traits. Some may be heat or drought lucrative to harvest seeds that stayed on the tolerant or resistant to a disease or pest. Others plant, seeds that had not already fallen to the may have enhanced nutritional attributes. And ground. Gatherers understood the connection from one variety to the next, you can even taste between seeds and plants. By taking the non- the difference. shattering harvested seed back to their camps and growing them, or by encouraging nearby stands of such plants in the wild, they would have increased the percentage of these non-shattering plants and correspondingly increased their harvest. Typically, the genetic difference between shattering and non-shattering seeds is spelled out in one or two genes. But this is the difference between wild plants and domesticated crops, a difference that our ancestors took hold of and began to exploit in earnest in the Neolithic period, more than 10,000 years ago. Domestication usually took place where wild forms of the crop plant were native. Thus, crops originated in certain regions. Rice, soya, All of these characteristics are produced banana, and oranges are from China in the Far by the genetic make-up of the plant or variety.
Recommended publications
  • Arctic Expedition12° 16° 20° 24° 28° 32° Spitsbergen U Svalbard Archipelago 80° 80°
    distinguished travel for more than 35 years Voyage UNDER THE Midnight Sun Arctic Expedition12° 16° 20° 24° 28° 32° Spitsbergen u Svalbard Archipelago 80° 80° 80° Raudfjorden Nordaustlandet Woodfjorden Smeerenburg Monaco Glacier The Arctic’s 79° 79° 79° Kongsfjorden Svalbard King’s Glacier Archipelago Ny-Ålesund Spitsbergen Longyearbyen Canada 78° 78° 78° i Greenland tic C rcle rc Sea Camp Millar A U.S. North Pole Russia Bellsund Calypsobyen Svalbard Archipelago Norway Copenhagen Burgerbukta 77° 77° 77° Cruise Itinerary Denmark Air Routing Samarin Glacier Hornsund Barents Sea June 20 to 30, 2022 4° 8° Spitsbergen12° u Samarin16° Glacier20° u Calypsobyen24° 76° 28° 32° 36° 76° Voyage across the Arctic Circle on this unique 11-day Monaco Glacier u Smeerenburg u Ny-Ålesund itinerary featuring a seven-night cruise round trip Copenhagen 1 Depart the U.S. or Canada aboard the Five-Star Le Boréal. Visit during the most 2 Arrive in Copenhagen, Denmark enchanting season, when the region is bathed in the magical 3 Copenhagen/Fly to Longyearbyen, Spitsbergen, light of the Midnight Sun. Cruise the shores of secluded Norway’s Svalbard Archipelago/Embark Le Boréal 4 Hornsund for Burgerbukta/Samarin Glacier Spitsbergen—the jewel of Norway’s rarely visited Svalbard 5 Bellsund for Calypsobyen/Camp Millar archipelago enjoy expert-led Zodiac excursions through 6 Cruising the Arctic Ice Pack sandstone mountain ranges, verdant tundra and awe-inspiring 7 MåkeØyane/Woodfjorden/Monaco Glacier ice formations. See glaciers calve in luminous blues and search 8 Raudfjorden for Smeerenburg for Arctic wildlife, including the “King of the Arctic,” the 9 Ny-Ålesund/Kongsfjorden for King’s Glacier polar bear, whales, walruses and Svalbard reindeer.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate in Svalbard 2100
    M-1242 | 2018 Climate in Svalbard 2100 – a knowledge base for climate adaptation NCCS report no. 1/2019 Photo: Ketil Isaksen, MET Norway Editors I.Hanssen-Bauer, E.J.Førland, H.Hisdal, S.Mayer, A.B.Sandø, A.Sorteberg CLIMATE IN SVALBARD 2100 CLIMATE IN SVALBARD 2100 Commissioned by Title: Date Climate in Svalbard 2100 January 2019 – a knowledge base for climate adaptation ISSN nr. Rapport nr. 2387-3027 1/2019 Authors Classification Editors: I.Hanssen-Bauer1,12, E.J.Førland1,12, H.Hisdal2,12, Free S.Mayer3,12,13, A.B.Sandø5,13, A.Sorteberg4,13 Clients Authors: M.Adakudlu3,13, J.Andresen2, J.Bakke4,13, S.Beldring2,12, R.Benestad1, W. Bilt4,13, J.Bogen2, C.Borstad6, Norwegian Environment Agency (Miljødirektoratet) K.Breili9, Ø.Breivik1,4, K.Y.Børsheim5,13, H.H.Christiansen6, A.Dobler1, R.Engeset2, R.Frauenfelder7, S.Gerland10, H.M.Gjelten1, J.Gundersen2, K.Isaksen1,12, C.Jaedicke7, H.Kierulf9, J.Kohler10, H.Li2,12, J.Lutz1,12, K.Melvold2,12, Client’s reference 1,12 4,6 2,12 5,8,13 A.Mezghani , F.Nilsen , I.B.Nilsen , J.E.Ø.Nilsen , http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/M1242 O. Pavlova10, O.Ravndal9, B.Risebrobakken3,13, T.Saloranta2, S.Sandven6,8,13, T.V.Schuler6,11, M.J.R.Simpson9, M.Skogen5,13, L.H.Smedsrud4,6,13, M.Sund2, D. Vikhamar-Schuler1,2,12, S.Westermann11, W.K.Wong2,12 Affiliations: See Acknowledgements! Abstract The Norwegian Centre for Climate Services (NCCS) is collaboration between the Norwegian Meteorological In- This report was commissioned by the Norwegian Environment Agency in order to provide basic information for use stitute, the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, Norwegian Research Centre and the Bjerknes in climate change adaptation in Svalbard.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Environments
    Characteristics of an arctic environment and the physical geography of Svalbard - ‘geography explained’ fact sheet The Arctic environment is little studied at Key Stage Three yet it is an excellent basis for an all-encompassing study of place or as a case study to illustrate key concepts within a specific theme. Svalbard, an archipelago lying in the Arctic Ocean north of mainland Europe, about midway between Norway and the North Pole, is a place with an awesome landscape and unique geography that includes issues and themes of global, regional and local importance. A study of Svalbard could allow pupils to broaden and deepen their knowledge and understanding of different aspects of the seven geographical concepts that underpin the revised Geography Key Stage Three Programme of Study. Many pupils will have a mental image of an Arctic landscape, some may have heard of Svalbard. A useful starting point for study is to explore these perceptions using visual prompts and big questions – where is the Arctic/Svalbard? What is it like? What is happening there? Why is it like this? How will it change? Svalbard exemplifies the distinctive physical and human characteristics of the Arctic and yet is also unique amongst Arctic environments. Perceptions and characteristics of the Arctic may be represented in many ways, including art and literature and the pupil’s own geographical imagination of the place. Maps and photographs are vital in helping pupils develop spatial understanding of locations, places and processes and the scale at which they occur. Source: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:W_W_Svalbard... 1 Longyearbyen, Svalbard’s capital Source:http://www.photos- The landscape of Western Svalbard voyages.com/spitzberg/images/spitzberg06_large.jpg Source: www.hi.is/~oi/svalbard_photos.htm Where is Svalbard? Orthographic map projection centred on Svalbard and showing location relative to UK and EuropeSource: www.answers.com/topic/orthographic- projection..
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Guide to Biodiversity
    SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS HABITATS SOILS CLOUDS LAKES RIVERS MOUNTAINS HUMANS INSECTS MAMMALS OCEANS BIRDS FISHES WORMS PLANTS FLOWERS BEES ACTIONS HABITS ORGANIZATIONS SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS HABITATS SOILS CLOUDS LAKES RIVERS MOUNTAINS HUMANS INSECTS MAMMALS OCEANS BIRDS FISHES WORMS PLANTS FLOWERS BEES ACTIONS HABITS ORGANIZATIONS SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS HABITATS SOILS CLOUDS LAKES RIVERS MOUNTAINS HUMANS INSECTS YOUTH AND UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL ALLIANCE LEARNING AND ACTION SERIES MAMMALS OCEANS BIRDS FISHES WORMS PLANTS FLOWERS BEES ACTIONS HABITS ORGANIZATIONS SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS HABITATS SOILS CLOUDS LAKES RIVERS YOUTH AND UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL ALLIANCE LEARNING AND ACTION SERIES SUPPORTED BY MOUNTAINS HUMANS INSECTS MAMMALS OCEANS BIRDS FISHES WORMS PLANTS FLOWERS BEES ACTIONS HABITS ORGANIZATIONS SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS HABITATS TAKE ACTION FOR BIODIVERSITY! THE TO SOILS CLOUDS LAKES RIVERS MOUNTAINS HUMANS INSECTS MAMMALS OCEANS BIRDS FISHES WORMS PLANTS FLOWERS BEES ACTIONS HABITS ORGANIZATIONS SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS HABITATS SOILS CLOUDS LAKES RIVERS MOUNTAINS HUMANS INSECTS MAMMALS OCEANS BIRDS FISHES WORMS PLANTS FLOWERS BEES YOUTHGUIDE BIODIVERSITY ACTIONS HABITSWE ORGANIZATIONS ARE SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS MANY HABITATS SOILS CLOUDS LAKES RIVERS MOUNTAINS HUMANS INSECTS MAMMALS OCEANS BIRDS FISHES WORMS PLANTS FLOWERS BEES ACTIONS HABITS ORGANIZATIONS SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS HABITATS SOILS CLOUDS LAKES RIVERS MOUNTAINS HUMANS INSECTS MAMMALS OCEANS BIRDS FISHES WORMS PLANTS FLOWERS BEES ACTIONS HABITS ORGANIZATIONSwww. SPECIES ECOSYSTEMS HABITATS SOILS CLOUDS
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Now & the Seed Bank Project
    DEEP NOW & THE SEED BANK PROJECT by Rachael Marne Jones A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Fine Arts in Art MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2018 ©COPYRIGHT by Rachael Marne Jones 2018 All Rights Reserved ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 2. BODY ..............................................................................................................................3 3. CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................................30 REFERENCES CITED ......................................................................................................32 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Detail of Landmark II ..........................................................................................6 2. Detail of Out of Site .............................................................................................9 3. Flow State Diptych .............................................................................................12 4. Instructional Drawing For The Seed Bank Project: Step 1 ...............................13 5. Instructional Drawing For The Seed Bank Project: Step 2 ...............................13 6. Ana Mendietta. Four stills from Silhueta Sangrieta ..........................................17 7. Prototype For The Long Now Clock .................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Soil Seed Bank Characteristics in Ponderosa Pine Forests Using Vegetation and Forest-Floor Data
    Estimating Soil Seed Bank Characteristics in Ponderosa Pine Forests Using United States Department of Agriculture Vegetation and Forest-Floor Data Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Note Scott R. Abella and Judith D. Springer RMRS-RN-35 September 2008 Abstract—Soil seed banks are important for vegetation management because they contain propagules of species that may be considered desirable or undesirable for site colonization after management and disturbance events. Knowledge of seed bank size and composition before planning management activities facilitates proactive management by providing early alerts of exotic species presence and of abilities of seed banks to promote colonization by desirable species. We developed models in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in northern Arizona to estimate the size and richness of mineral soil seed banks using readily observable vegetation and forest- floor characteristics. Regression models using three or fewer predictors explained 41 to 59 percent of the variance in 0- to 2-inch (0- to 5-cm) seed densities of total and native perennial seed banks. Key predictors included aboveground plant species richness/10.8 ft2 (1 m2), litter weight and thickness, and tree canopy type (open or closed). Both total and native perennial seed banks were larger and richer in plots containing: (1) species-rich understories, (2) sparse litter, and (3) tree canopy openings. A regression tree model estimated that seed bank density of native perennials is 14-fold greater if aboveground plant richness exceeds eight species/10.8 ft2, forest-floor leaf litter is < 1 inch (2.5 cm) thick, and tree canopies are open. Introduction Soil seed banks are important for vegetation man- agement in ponderosa pine forests in at least four ways.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Seeds of Success Program
    collect • evaluate • establish • grow • store • restore Seeds of Success (SOS) was established in 2001 by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in partnership with the Millennium Seed Bank Project (MSB) to collect, conserve, and develop native plant materials for restoration across the United States. The initial partnership between BLM and MSB quickly grew to include many additional partners, such as botanic gardens, arboreta, zoos, and municipalities. These SOS teams share a common protocol to coordinate seed collecting and species targeting efforts. SOS is a vital part of the Native Plant Materials Development Program. To date, SOS has over 12,000 native seed collections in its National Collection. This material is used for restoration projects, native plant materials development projects such as germination trials, common garden studies, and protocol establishment. Portions of each collection are also held in long-term storage facilities for conservation. 2010 was an especially productive collection year, made possible by an influx of $1.25 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds. These funds put an additional 43 collectors on the ground, allowing SOS to nearly double collection capacity. 3,000 ~2,700 SOS has partnerships nationwide for permits to collect on 40 USDA Forest Service National Forests, 10 U.S. Fish & 2,500 Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuges, 6 Department 2,000 of Defense areas, The Nature Conservancy’s lands and 1,474 1,504 1,500 multiple state and local lands. Non-federal SOS partners 1,235 1,208 1,012 1,044 1,058 have made significant collections in the Midwest, Texas, 1,000 685 447 Eastern U.S., and San Diego County.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Exam SH-201 the History of Svalbard the University Centre in Svalbard, Monday 6 February 2012
    Written exam SH-201 The History of Svalbard The University Centre in Svalbard, Monday 6 February 2012 The exam is a 3 hour written test. It consists of two parts: Part I is a multiple choice test of factual knowledge. Note: This sheet with answers to part I shall be handed in. Part II (see below) is an essay part where you write extensively about one of two alternative subjects. No aids except dictionary are permitted. You may answer in English, Norwegian, Swedish or Danish. 1 2 Part I counts approximately /3 and part II counts /3 of the grade at the evaluation, but adjustment may take place. Both parts must be passed in order to pass the whole exam. Part I: Multiple choice test. Make only one cross for each question. In what year was Bjørnøya discovered by Willem 1. 1569 1596 1603 Barentsz? 2. When did land-based whaling end on Svalbard? ca. 1630 ca. 1680 ca. 1720 Which geographical region did most Russian 3. Pechora Murmansk White Sea hunters and trappers come from? When did Norwegian hunters and trappers start 4. ca. 1700 the 1750s the 1820s going to Svalbard regularly? From when dates the first map to show the whole 5. 1598 1714 1872 Svalbard archipelago? A famous scientific expedition visited Svalbard in 6. Chichagov Fram 1838–39. Which name is it known under? Recherche Svalbard was for a long time a no man’s land. In 7. Norway Sweden Russia 1871, who took an initiative to annex the islands? 8. When did Norway formally take over sovereignty? 1916 1920 1925 When was the Sysselmann (Governor of Svalbard) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeds & Seed Practices
    A Preliminary Report on Seeds & Seed Practices across the United States For too many people and communities around the world, patenting seeds and the genetic manipulation of seeds the dominant agricultural model is causing economic for corporate profit. We must shed light on and uphold hardship, the destruction of biological diversity, and the the rights of all of life to grow, evolve, and be present in exploitation of earth’s ecological commons. It is a model ecology, even the whole of the Earth. Seeds are one of the based on the commodification of life. We can no longer foundational elements to our food system and must be continue the status quo that enables multi-national defended because they affirm our lives, our very suste- corporations to corner our food system and our seed nance, and our relationship to place, culture, plants, and commons. Every element that is foundational to life (food, all of nature. water, land, air) is under threat of privatization and mar- ketization by an economic order that seeks to profit and This report is written to examine current seed culture, sav- own our common wealth. ing, keeping and sharing, and seed advocacy across the United States and North America. This is an initial report The growing global movement by peasants, growers, of the seed survey sent out by the Rights of the Mother farm workers, fisherfolk, pastoralists, indigenous peoples, Earth/Defense of the Commons Workgroup of the U.S. urban growers, food system policy advocates, and human Food Sovereignty Alliance in summer 2013, to deepen the rights activists has born witness to a growing trend of discussion around seeds and the rights of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Biodiversity and Climate Change
    Australia’s Biodiversity and Climate Change A strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change A report to the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council commissioned by the Australian Government. Prepared by the Biodiversity and Climate Change Expert Advisory Group: Will Steffen, Andrew A Burbidge, Lesley Hughes, Roger Kitching, David Lindenmayer, Warren Musgrave, Mark Stafford Smith and Patricia A Werner © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISBN 978-1-921298-67-7 Published in pre-publication form as a non-printable PDF at www.climatechange.gov.au by the Department of Climate Change. It will be published in hard copy by CSIRO publishing. For more information please email [email protected] This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney-General's Department 3-5 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] Or online at: http://www.ag.gov.au Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Climate Change and Water and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts. Citation The book should be cited as: Steffen W, Burbidge AA, Hughes L, Kitching R, Lindenmayer D, Musgrave W, Stafford Smith M and Werner PA (2009) Australia’s biodiversity and climate change: a strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Key-Site Monitoring in Norway 2018, Including Svalbard and Jan Mayen
    Short Report 1-2019 Key-site monitoring in Norway 2018, including Svalbard and Jan Mayen Tycho Anker-Nilssen, Rob Barrett, Børge Moe, Tone K. Reiertsen, Geir H. Systad, Jan Ove Bustnes, Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard, Sébastien Descamps, Kjell-Einar Erikstad, Arne Follestad, Sveinn Are Hanssen, Magdalene Langset, Svein-Håkon Lorentsen, Erlend Lorentzen, Hallvard Strøm, © SEAPOP 2019 SEAPOP Short Report 1-2019 Key-site monitoring in Norway 2018, including Svalbard and Jan Mayen Breeding success The 2018 breeding season was, overall, not good for Norwegian seabirds (Table 1a) with a third of the populations having a poor breeding success, as was the case in 2017. Fortunately, several populations did do well (38% compared to 34% in 2017). When comparing pelagic and coastal populations, the former were more successful (43% good, 22% poor) than the coastal (33% good, 33% poor). Among the pelagic species, northern gannets and razorbills fared best with a good breeding success recorded in two out of two and three of four populations respectively. Common guillemots also did well with five of eight populations having good breeding success. The three puffin colonies monitored in the Barents Sea produced many chicks while at Røst breeding success was poor for the 12th year in a row. At the two other colonies in the Norwegian Sea, it was moderate. Little auks on Bjørnøya did well, but only moderately so on Spitsbergen. The fulmar’s success on Jan Mayen was good, but poor on Røst and Sklinna. Brünnich’s guillemots had a poor breeding season on Jan Mayen, a good one on Bjørnøya and a moderate one on Spitsbergen.
    [Show full text]