Billy Mitchell's Parachute Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Billy Mitchell's Parachute Plan Billy Mitchell’s Parachute Plan By Phillip S. Meilinger n April 1940, as part of Hitler’s was startlingly original and clearly balloons at fairgrounds for a century. plan to invade Norway, 24 Ju visionary. The fi rst successful military jump 52 transport aircraft, escorted For most of World War I, the Western from an airplane occurred in March by two twin-engine fi ghters, Front was a stagnant and bloody trench 1912, made by a US soldier at Jef- dropped 130 German paratroop- war. Frontal assaults were common ferson Barracks, Mo. During World Iers near Sola airfi eld at Stavanger. because outfl anking maneuvers were War I, soldiers in tethered observation Dropped from an altitude of just 400 impossible—the front stretched in an balloons deployed along the Western feet, the paratroopers landed and se- unbroken line from the North Sea to Front wore parachutes because the cured the valuable airfi eld in an hour. Switzerland. Generals on both sides balloons came under frequent attacks German reinforcements began fl ooding made numerous attempts to break the from enemy pursuit (fi ghter) aircraft. in by air; Norway fell in days. stalemate, using rolling artillery bar- The operation was the fi rst major rages, poison gas, fl amethrowers, new A DEADLY VISE combat paratroop drop in history. Many penetration tactics, tanks, and attack A downed balloon was counted as an would follow, and paratroop forces— aircraft. They hoped to break through aerial victory, and some pilots became quite a bit larger than the relatively the lines and create fl anks, thus restor- aces based on their ability to “fl ame sau- small contingent at Stavanger—came ing mobility to the battlefi eld. sages.” Frank Luke received the Medal to be fi elded by all the great powers These tactics were at best only of Honor for such actions—downing 14 of that war. moderately successful and then only at German balloons in less than three weeks. This new concept—vertical envel- certain times and places. Even the huge When an attack came, it was standard opment—didn’t originate in World infl ux of fresh American infantrymen procedure for winch operators below to War II, however, but in World War in early 1918 made little difference. It rapidly lower the balloon, but not before I. Brig. Gen. Billy Mitchell, the top appeared the bloodbath would continue. the observer in the basket quickly jumped American air commander of that war, Mitchell thought in the third dimen- out and deployed his parachute. devised a plan for dropping a divi- sion, however, and parachutes came to Italy began parachuting spies into sion of American infantrymen behind his mind. enemy territory during the war, and German lines. The war ended before Parachutes weren’t a new idea; they’d the French dropped two-man demoli- the plan could be executed, but it been used by daredevils jumping out of tion crews behind German lines in 58 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2014 Airborne operations were vital in World War II, but Billy Mitchell had devised a credible plan in the late days of World War I. At left: US paratroopers land in the Philippines in 1945. Here: C-47s drop para- troopers into the Netherlands during Operation Market Garden in 1944. Brig. Gen. Billy Mitchell had proposed such attempts at “vertical envelopment” more National Archives photo than two decades earlier. early 1918. Mitchell knew of these In his war memoirs, Mitchell wrote Engineers in New York. This group was activities. He had already employed that he’d suggested to Pershing that the one of the most prestigious organiza- aircraft in mass formations to clear the entire 1st Infantry Division be assigned tions of scientists and engineers in the skies of enemy aircraft and to strafe permanently to the Air Service. Persh- country, and Mitchell revealed the idea and bomb enemy troop positions and ing mulled the idea for a few minutes he’d pitched to Pershing fi ve months supply lines. In September 1918, he and then told him to go ahead and previously. Mitchell said, “We had a had commanded more than 1,400 Al- begin planning. He would decide if plan, which we were going to try this lied aircraft, an unprecedented total, the plan looked feasible after he saw spring if the war had not stopped, and during the Meuse-Argonne offensive. more details. it would have worked, too. We were The next month he approached Gen. Delighted, Mitchell hurried back to going to send our men over the German John J. Pershing, commander of the his headquarters at Ligny-en-Barrois lines in airplanes and drop them down American Expeditionary Forces, with to lay the idea before his staff. He in parachutes and let them attack the an idea to break the trench stalemate. directed his operations offi cer, Maj. enemy in the rear, while our men were Mitchell proposed using British- Lewis H. Brereton, to begin planning attacking the front.” made Handley Page bombers, as well for a major airborne operation to take He said he planned to use the 1st as Italian-built Capronis, to drop in- place the following spring. In his own Infantry Division—12,000 men—to fantrymen plus medium-size machine memoirs, Brereton wrote that Mitchell be dropped at Metz. His plan was guns behind enemy lines. He argued “dumped plans in my lap” and told him superior to those being drawn for a that such a surprise attack would catch to get busy. major ground offensive against Metz, the Germans manning the trenches in The war ended three weeks later, because that city was guarded by “divi- a deadly vise—Allied infantry would however, so the drop would not go into sion after division of the crack troops attack from the front while the para- action, and planning did not get very of the German army, anticipating our troopers would attack from the rear. far. Nonetheless, Mitchell spoke and move.” Using the ground plan, Metz The Germans would undoubtedly break wrote about the idea after the war would eventually have fallen, Mitchell and fl ee, and mobility would fi nally be was over. argued, but at tremendous cost—yet an- restored to the battlefi eld after nearly In March 1919, Mitchell gave a other bloodbath for which the Western four years of stalemate. speech to the Society of Automobile Front had become infamous. AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2014 59 AP photo Writing in a May 1926 newspaper tions. The pursuit aircraft would then be expanded, saying, “Almighty God article, Mitchell stated that he’d been join up with the bombers and escort helps those who fi rst help themselves.” promised the use of 60 squadrons of them back to friendly territory. Clearly, Mitchell’s concept for an Handley Page bombers—1,200 air- Mitchell continued that once the airborne operation was visionary, but craft—and that he would also be given paratroopers were on the ground, was it feasible? When he proposed the the services of a top infantry division. the converted bombers would be able idea in October 1918, there were nowhere The Handley Page O/400 was a heavy to resupply them with ammunition, near the 1,200 bombers available that bomber used by the Royal Air Force to food, and other supplies with little Mitchell said would be necessary. Yet, strike German positions, airfi elds, and difficulty. orders had been placed for more, and industrial facilities. Mitchell calculated Men would be lost during the drop, it is likely such a number of Handley that each aircraft would be able to carry Mitchell admitted, and those on the Pages and Capronis would have been in 10 fully loaded paratroopers as well as ground would be somewhat vulner- service by the spring of 1919. Would that two medium-size machine guns. able, but he noted that those soldiers many aircraft have been entrusted to a The Handley Page was a big aircraft, would have a potential strength of 2,400 young brigadier general? Some 1,400 but even so, at 10 men per airplane, it machine guns. combat aircraft, consisting of units from would take a huge air fl eet to transport “If we could have only got 10 per- the French and British air arms besides an entire division. By war’s end, the cent in action against the enemy’s rear, the Air Service, had been under his RAF had some 250 Handley Pages we should have been successful. One command at the Meuse-Argonne, so the operational, with another 1,500 on machine gun, properly placed, can notion of Mitchell leading an airborne order. Moreover, the Handley Page hold up a battalion at times,” Mitchell air armada is not far-fetched. V/1500 was also entering production. asserted in the May 1926 article. He The bombers would have needed to This four-engine behemoth would be added that the Germans would have be modifi ed. Although the British and able to carry up to 20 paratroopers. been subjected “to the most withering Italian aircraft would have been large Paratroopers on each aircraft would fi re ever known. ... The pathway would enough to carry 10 to 20 men plus their carry extra bandoliers of ammunition have been thrown open for the American equipment and extra machine guns, the plus machine guns. This mighty air Army to advance into Metz.” airplanes were not designed for such a armada would be escorted by hundreds purpose. In addition, some provision of pursuit and attack airplanes. Three WOULD IT HAVE WORKED? would have had to have been made for the miles from the front lines these escorts By this time, Mitchell had already paratroopers to exit the aircraft—simply would break to the left and right, and “at been court-martialed, found guilty, and jumping out of the observer’s cockpit a predetermined moment, those attack resigned.
Recommended publications
  • Building a Flying Machine
    Building a Flying Machine By: Arianna Bilal-Threats At first we made our fuselage out of straws because we thought air flow would take over and increase lift. We made the wings out of folder paper because we thought it would be sturdier than regular paper. After learning about the 4 forces- lift, thrust, drag, and weight, we knew that there needed to be a point at the front of the plane called a nose. So, we used a fuselage made out of a plastic bottle because it has a point that looked like a nose. We cut the bottom off of the bottle. We thought the air would flow through and increase lift, the force that brings you up. And for wings, we used cardboard. We also had double wings because at a museum we saw the Wright brothers plane had double wings and their plane was a success. Then, we noticed our fuselage was the heaviest part of the plane. So, we made a plane with all paper. We folded a half of a paper into a tube and put a paper point at the front for a nose. Then, for the wings we made little rectangles (x4) and took 2. Then, we curved one and put it on top. The same for the other wing. We decided to put a curve on top of the wing to increase a stream lined shape. That flew! But, not for long. We were happy but we wanted something that flew long distance. So, we tried something simpler. We used a straw and taped two wings on top.
    [Show full text]
  • The Design and Development of an Electromechanical Drogue Parachute Line Release Mechanism for Level 3 High-Power Amateur Rockets
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 5-24-2019 The Design and Development of an Electromechanical Drogue Parachute Line Release Mechanism for Level 3 High-Power Amateur Rockets Marie House Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation House, Marie, "The Design and Development of an Electromechanical Drogue Parachute Line Release Mechanism for Level 3 High-Power Amateur Rockets" (2019). University Honors Theses. Paper 753. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.770 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. The design and development of an electromechanical drogue parachute line release mechanism for level 3 high-power amateur rockets by Marie House An undergraduate honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in University Honors and Mechanical Engineering Thesis Adviser Robert Paxton Portland State University 2019 Abstract This research has developed a viable drogue parachute release system sufficient for recovering level 3 amateur rockets. The system is based on the simple mechanics of combining two lever arms and a 2 to 1 pulley interaction to create a 200:1 force reduction between the weight applied to the system and the force required to release it. A linear actuator retracts a release cord, triggering the three rings that hold the system together to unfurl from one another and separate the drogue parachute from the payload.
    [Show full text]
  • B-25 Mitchell
    Airpower Classics Artwork by Zaur Eylanbekov B-25 Mitchell On April 18, 1942, Army Air Forces Lt. Col. James “Pappy” Gunn’s fabled 75 mm cannon. The Mitchell H. “Jimmy” Doolittle, leading a force of 16 B-25B was never the fastest, most maneuverable, or medium bombers and crews, took off from the best-looking medium bomber. However, it grew to aircraft carrier USS Hornet and bombed Tokyo be the most heavily armed and was more versatile and other targets. It was the first time US aircraft than any—even the German Junkers Ju 88. had struck at Japan, and the raid immortalized both Doolittle and the B-25 Mitchell. The North Noted for its excellent handling characteristics, the American Aviation bomber went on to become a B-25 performed remarkably well in many roles, workhorse in every theater of World War II. including medium- and low-altitude bomber, close air support, photo reconnaissance, anti- North American proposed the new Model NA-62, submarine warfare, patrol, and—when occasion derived from a series of earlier prototypes, in a demanded—tactical fighter. Later it was used as 1939 competition. The Army bought it right off a pilot and navigator trainer, and became much the drawing board, ordering 184 of the airplanes. beloved in that role. In peacetime, it served as an The clean, lean lines of the B-25 delivered good executive transport, firefighter, camera airplane, performance and facilitated both mass produc- test vehicle, and crop duster. The last B-25 train- tion and maintenance. Built in 10 major models, ers remained in service at Reese AFB, Tex., until with numerous variants, the B-25 was particularly finally retiring in January 1959—nearly 17 years adaptable to field modifications.
    [Show full text]
  • This Index Lists the Army Units for Which Records Are Available at the Eisenhower Library
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS U.S. ARMY: Unit Records, 1917-1950 Linear feet: 687 Approximate number of pages: 1,300,000 The U.S. Army Unit Records collection (formerly: U.S. Army, U.S. Forces, European Theater: Selected After Action Reports, 1941-45) primarily spans the period from 1917 to 1950, with the bulk of the material covering the World War II years (1942-45). The collection is comprised of organizational and operational records and miscellaneous historical material from the files of army units that served in World War II. The collection was originally in the custody of the World War II Records Division (now the Modern Military Records Branch), National Archives and Records Service. The material was withdrawn from their holdings in 1960 and sent to the Kansas City Federal Records Center for shipment to the Eisenhower Library. The records were received by the Library from the Kansas City Records Center on June 1, 1962. Most of the collection contained formerly classified material that was bulk-declassified on June 29, 1973, under declassification project number 735035. General restrictions on the use of records in the National Archives still apply. The collection consists primarily of material from infantry, airborne, cavalry, armor, artillery, engineer, and tank destroyer units; roughly half of the collection consists of material from infantry units, division through company levels. Although the collection contains material from over 2,000 units, with each unit forming a separate series, every army unit that served in World War II is not represented. Approximately seventy-five percent of the documents are from units in the European Theater of Operations, about twenty percent from the Pacific theater, and about five percent from units that served in the western hemisphere during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Cincinnati's Doolittle Raider at War
    Queen City Heritage Thomas C. Griffin, a resident of Cincinnati for over forty years, participated in the first bombing raid on Japan in World War II, the now leg- endary Doolittle raid. (CHS Photograph Collection) Winter 1992 Navigating from Shangri-La Navigating from Shangri- La: Cincinnati's Doolittle Raider at War Kevin C. McHugh served as Cincinnati's oral historian for "one of America's biggest gambles"5 of World War II, the now legendary Doolittle Raid on Japan. A soft-spoken man, Mr. Griffin Over a half century ago on April 18, 1942, characteristically downplays his part in the first bombing the Cincinnati Enquirer reported: "Washington, April 18 raid on Japan: "[It] just caught the fancy of the American — (AP) — The War and Navy Departments had no confir- people. A lot of people had a lot worse assignments."6 mation immediately on the Japanese announcement of the Nevertheless, he has shared his wartime experiences with bombing of Tokyo."1 Questions had been raised when Cincinnati and the country, both in speaking engagements Tokyo radio, monitored by UPI in San Francisco, had sud- and in print. In 1962 to celebrate the twentieth anniversary denly gone off the air and then had interrupted program- of the historic mission, the Cincinnati Enquirer highlight- ming for a news "flash": ed Mr. Griffin's recollections in an article that began, Enemy bombers appeared over Tokyo for the "Bomber Strike from Carrier Recalled."7 For the fiftieth first time since the outbreak of the current war of Greater anniversary in 1992, the Cincinnati Post shared his adven- East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • State Archives of North Carolina Tiny Broadwick Pioneer of Aviation Lesson Guide This Is a Picture of the Balloon from Which Tiny Made Most of Her Jumps
    State Archives of North Carolina Tiny Broadwick Pioneer of Aviation Lesson Guide This is a picture of the balloon from which Tiny made most of her jumps. 1 Fun facts about the “Broadwick” balloons •No altimeter was used so she had to listen for the sound of a blank being shot out of a gun for the signal to jump. •The balloon usually rose two thousand feet or higher. •The heat used to inflate the balloon was coal oil which gave the ever-present possibility of it catching on fire. •The winds were unpredictable and steering the parachute almost impossible. •The balloon was made out of eleven hundred yards of sheeting like unbleached muslin. •The balloon stood ninety-two feet high and fifty-six feet through the middle. •Tiny would hang on a trapeze suspended from the balloon. •When the air in the balloon cooled, it was at maximum height. •The aeronaut had to jump before the balloon cooled too much since it would start to fall. •There was no gauge to tell when the balloon was ready to rise; the aeronaut had to use his/her intuition. •Before Charles Broadwick invented a automatic ground support, at least 15 to 20 men would have to hold the balloon down before they released it and it rose. Make a list of things you notice about the balloon pictured here that is different from balloons used today? 2 While you are looking at these images of Tiny think about the type of clothing she is wearing. # 1 Photograph of Tiny Broadwick in outfit worn as #2 Tiny Broadwick wearing one of her outfits she “Doll girl.” wore for airplane jumps.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Guide for Powered Parachute Ultralights
    TTrraaiinniinngg GGuuiiddee ffoorr PPoowweerreedd PPaarraacchhuuttee UUllttrraalliigghhttss Safety Information for Instructors and Students EAA Powered Parachute Ultralight Training Guide Version 1.2 ______________________________________________________________________________ Introduction Ultralight aviation in the United States is the most unencumbered opportunity for solo flight in the world. Tremendous freedoms are given to ultralight pilots. However, at the same time there are strict limitations that must be followed. With this freedom, however, come responsibilities to ensure the safety of other individuals in the airspace as well as on the ground. In 1982 the FAA issued Federal Aviation Regulation Part 103, Ultralight Vehicles. With this regulation, the FAA chose to identify ultralights as vehicles and not aircraft. Because they are vehicles and not aircraft, this regulation allows individuals to operate ultralight vehicles without requiring FAA pilot or vehicle certification. Upon publishing Part 103 the FAA said it did not wish to issue pilot certificates for ultralight operators. Instead, the FAA said individuals who want to fly ultralights should participate in industry-established self-regulation and training programs. Since 1983 EAA has maintained programs to support Part 103 and has held an exemption to Part 103 that allowed the operation of 2-place ultralight training vehicles by authorized ultralight flight instructors. In 2004, the FAA passed the sport pilot & light-sport aircraft regulations. One specific purpose of this new rule was to transition 2-place ultralight training vehicles to experimental light-sport aircraft. As a result, after the training exemption expires on 1/31/08 there will no longer be a way to fly a 2-place ultralight to train ultralight pilots.
    [Show full text]
  • Properly Sizing Parachutes for Your Rockets
    I S S U E 1 4 9 - OCTOBER 7, 2 0 0 5 Properly Sizing Parachutes for Your Rockets INSIDE: • Working with Parachute Descent Rates • Refinishing Damaged Tubes • Website Worth Visiting 1130 Elkton Drive, Suite A Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907 USA www.ApogeeRockets.com e-mail: [email protected] phone: 719-535-9335 fax: 719-534-9050 I S S U E 1 4 9 - OCTOBER 7 , 2 0 0 5 than any other recovery method. The best parachutes are made from strong, thin, soft, fl exible material. For "Are Your Descent Rates Decent?": small models, thin plastic sheets work very well be- Calculating How Fast Your Models Fall cause they can be folded up tightly to fi t into small-di- ameter body tubes. Some sources for parachute cano- pies include: Mylar®, plastic drop cloths, dry-cleaning by John Manfredo bags, trash bags, and gift-wrapping plastic. Use care when selecting a plastic material for a parachute. Test {Ed. Part I of this article comes from the book: it by trying to tear it in both directions-sometimes the "Model Rocket Design and Construction" by Tim Van material is strong in one direction but weak in another. Milligan.} Use only plastic that is strong in both directions. For PART I rockets with a descent mass greater than 300 grams (10.5 oz.) use a cloth material like cotton, silk, polyes- ter, or nylon. These materials can withstand the larger Parachute Design opening forces that bigger models can create. Heat- Parachutes can be used on almost any size rocket.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Testing of the Kistler Landing System Parachutes
    AIAA-99-1707 DESIGN AND TESTING OF THE KISTLER LANDING SYSTEM PARACHUTES Anthony P. Taylor*, Robert J. Sinclair , Richard D. Allamby, M.B.E.à Irvin Aerospace Inc., Santa Ana, California 92704 The Kistler Landing system consists of parachutes and airbags to land both stages of the Kistler Aerospace, K-1 Reusable Launch Vehicle. The K-1 Reusable Launch Vehicle is a commercial venture to develop the worlds first fully re-usable launch vehicle. The unmanned launcher consists of two stages, the first or Launch Assist Platform (LAP), and the second stage, or Orbital Vehicle (OV). This paper presents an update on the status of parachute testing for the Kistler program. Introduction The Kistler Landing system consists of parachutes and airbags to land both stages of the Kistler Aerospace, K-1 Reusable Launch Vehicle. The K-1 Reusable Launch Vehicle is a commercial venture to develop the worlds first fully re-usable launch vehicle. The unmanned launcher consists of two stages, the first or Launch Assist Platform (LAP), and the second stage, or Orbital Vehicle (OV). Following staging, the LAP performs a return to launch site maneuver and is then recovered for a soft earth landing using parachutes and airbags. Recovery of the nearly 45,000 lb vehicle is accomplished with a drogue and main stage, followed by an airbag attenuated impact. The drogue stage consists of two 40.0 ft conical ribbon parachutes, similar in design to the shuttle orbiter parabrake. The main stage consists of six (6), 156.0 ft. diameter ring sail parachutes. These parachutes are rigged in two clusters of three parachutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Bombing
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters University of Nebraska Press Fall 2010 Beneficial Bombing Mark Clodfelter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Clodfelter, Mark, "Beneficial Bombing" (2010). University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters. 37. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples/37 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Nebraska Press at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. runninghead 1 2 3 4 ( ##& 5 6 7 8 )'#(! 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 i Buy the Book Benecial Bombing—Clodfelter Roger Buchholz, designer Studies in War, Society, and the Military general editors Peter Maslowski University of Nebraska–Lincoln David Graff Kansas State University Reina Pennington Norwich University editorial board D’Ann Campbell Director of Government and Foundation Relations, U.S. Coast Guard Foundation Mark A. Clodfelter National War College Brooks D. Simpson Arizona State University Roger J. Spiller George C. Marshall Professor of Military History U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (retired) Timothy H. E. Travers University of Calgary Arthur Waldron Lauder Professor of International Relations University of Pennsylvania Buy the Book FM3-Title page Recto Use page pdf as supplied.
    [Show full text]
  • The System Approach to Spin/Stall Parachute Recovery Systems--A Five Year Update
    The System Approach to Spin/Stall Parachute Recovery Systems--A Five Year Update Anthony P. (Tony) Taylor Director, Business and Technical Development Irvin Aerospace Inc INTRODUCTION Slightly over 5 years ago, Irvin Aerospace Inc (Irvin) presented to the SETP Symposium our solution to the ‘System Approach’ for Spin/Stall Parachute Recovery Systems (SSPRS). In general, this involved additional involvement of the parachute manufacturer, to provide the entire suite of components that support the control, deployment and release of the parachute. In our previous experience, several of these components were designed and built by the airframe manufacturer, typically by a flight test organization. For reasons that will be described, this approach is largely being replaced by the ‘one stop shop’ approach. The benefits, including highly increased experience and lessons learned, are outlined herein. This Paper reviews our experiences over the past five (5) years. Having delivered, installed, and operated systems on tens of aircraft, and several classes, we have refined and improved equipment, procedures and processes. Many of these lessons learned are presented, either as general programmatic comments, or as descriptions of detailed changes to critical components. We also present some lessons learned that are directly related to flight-testing this class of system. Finally, we present some system deployment sequences that provide enhanced understanding of the overall system function. IRVIN AEROSPACE INC PAGE: 2 OF 34 WHAT IS A SPIN/STALL PARACHUTE RECOVERY SYSTEM? The parachute approach to Spin/Stall Parachute Recovery System (SSPRS) is rather well defined. It involves a relatively rapid deployment of the parachute from the aircrafts tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Jimmy Doolittle E Commander Behind the Legend
    THE 17 DREW PER PA S Jimmy Doolittle e Commander behind the Legend Benjamin W. Bishop Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Air University Steven L. Kwast, Lieutenant General, Commander and President School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Thomas D. McCarthy, Colonel, Commandant and Dean AIR UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ADVANCED AIR AND SPACE STUDIES Jimmy Doolittle The Commander behind the Legend Benjamin W. Bishop Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Drew Paper No. 17 Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jerry Gantt Bishop, Benjamin W., 1975– Copy Editor Jimmy Doolittle, the commander behind the legend / Tammi K. Dacus Benjamin W. Bishop, Lieutenant Colonel, USAF. pages cm. — (Drew paper, ISSN 1941-3785 ; no. 17) Cover Art, Book Design, and Illustrations Includes bibliographical references. Daniel Armstrong ISBN 978-1-58566-245-6 Composition and Prepress Production 1. Doolittle, James Harold, 1896-1993—Military leadership. Michele D. Harrell 2. Generals—United States—Biography. 3. Command of Print Preparation and Distribution troops—Case studies. 4. United States. Army Air Forces. Air Diane Clark Force, 8th. 5. World War, 1939-1945—Aerial operations, Amer- ican. I. Title. UG626.2.D66B57 2014 940.54’4973092—dc23 2014035210 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Published by Air University Press in February 2015 ISBN: 978-1-58566-245-6 Director and Publisher ISSN: 1941-3785 Allen G. Peck Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Managing Editor Demorah Hayes
    [Show full text]