DOCSLIB.ORG

17Lc-017 Memorandum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
17Lc-017 Memorandum Landmark Commission Development Services Department City of Galveston June 5, 2017 17LC-017 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Schwenk, Chair and Commissioners Galveston Landmark Commission FROM: Catherine Gorman, AICP, Historic Preservation Officer Development Services Department DATE: May 31,2017 RE: 17LC-017 (5920 Avenue Q Yz) Request for designation as a Galveston Landmark. Property is legally described as Lots 13- 16, Garretts Subdivision, in the City and County of Galveston, Texas. Applicant and Property Owner: Linda Sue Martin The Galveston Landmark Commission, at their meeting on March 20, 2017, voted to recommend approval of this request. The request is for designation of an accessory structure that was described by the owner as a vault. The Staff has been provided with additional information from the daughter of the original owner regarding the history of the accessory building: In the late SO's and early 60's, many people were concerned about nuclear war. In fact, many people at that time decided to build a bomb shelter or a fallout shelter in that event. More aptly they were all the rage; and the fallout shelter was considered "a civil defense initiative intended to reduce casualties if a nuclear war occurred". Simple research confirms, "they were designed to allow occupants to avoid exposure to harmful radioactive fallout from a nuclear blast, and its likely aftermath of radiation, until radioactivity dropped to a safer level". According to an article written on December 3rd, 2009 in the Hudson Star-Observer (google.com) "The fallout shelter craze came with the cold war involving the United States and Russia". In 1957 under President Eisenhower, the Gaither Report concluded that "the United States would soon be surpassed in all categories of nuclear weaponry and that civil defense preparations in the USSR were well ahead of American efforts". Along about this time, my Dad decided to build such a structure for our family. As Galveston is only 3 ft. above sea level, the likelihood it could be built underground was not a consideration. So my father, decided an above ground structure, fully fortified by one foot concrete would work just as well. I do not know how many other fallout, or bomb, shelters were built in Galveston County at the time but I know there were several in Santa Fe and surrounding areas. A few years later, President John F. Kennedy went a step further when he suggested "A fallout shelter for everybody as rapidly as possible". I can just imagine that during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, my Dad, who was always prepared, was grateful he'd been Landmark Commission Development Services Department City of Galveston June 5, 2017 ahead of the curve. I remember the times the civil defense would sound a whistle and the times we were told to hide under our desks at school. How that was supposed to stop us from being annihilated by a nuclear bomb I'm not sure, but I guess the school system thought they were at least doing something to help! In light of the new information submitted, Staff found that it would be appropriate to return the case the Landmark Commission and Planning Commissions for reconsideration. Staff finds that the accessory structure continues to be eligible for designation as a Galveston Landmark and meets the following criteria of Article 10 of the Land Development Regulations: 1. The character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City of Galveston, Galveston County, the State of Texas, or the United States. The Elliot Bomb Shelter is valuable to the cultural history of the City of Galveston due to its association with the Cold War. The Cold War refers to a period of geopolitical tension after World War II between powers in the Eastern Bloc and Western Bloc. 2. Association with events that have made significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regional, state or national history and association with the lives of people significant in the city, region, state or national past. The tensions of the Cold War lead to an increase in the construction of private bomb shelters as a reaction to the threat of nuclear war. Most bomb shelters were constructed underground. Due to Galveston's high water table, construction underground was not feasible and the shelter was built above ground. It is the only known example of a bomb shelter in the City of Galveston. 3. Distinctive characteristics of a period or method of construction, or architecture; representative of, or a rare survivor of, the work of a master designer, builder or craftsman. The Elliot Bomb Shelter has the distinctive characteristics of a method of construction. The shelter is constructed of concrete with walls one-foot thick and accessed by a steel door with a combination lock. 4. Retention of historic integrity, meaning that the property possesses several, and usually most, of the following aspects of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association. The Elliot Bomb Shelter retains all ofthe above listed aspects of integrity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff continues to recommend approval with the following conditions: Specific Condition: 1. The Galveston Landmark designation shall apply to the vault structure only; and Standard Condition: 2. As with all properties containing a Historic Overlay Designation, including Landmark Designations, exterior alterations to the property will be subject to review and approval by the Landmark Commission and must conform to the Design Standards for Historic Properties of Galveston, Texas. Landmark Commission Development Services Department City of Galveston June 5, 2017 OTHER REVIEWS The Planning Commission will review at their June 6, 2017 meeting. City Council has final authority on Galveston Landmark requests and will review at the June 22, 2017 meeting. SUBJECT PROPERTY Landmark Commission Development Services Department City of Galveston June 5, 2017 17LC-018 STAFF REPORT ADDRESS: Public Notice and Comment: 81113th Street No Sent Returned In Favor Opposed Comment 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Property is legally described as Northwest Part of Lot 13 and North 55.5' of Lot 14, Block 315, in the City and County of Galveston, Texas APPLICANT /REPRESENTATIVE: Charles and Elizabeth Spillar PROPERTY OWNER: Same ZONING DISTRICT: Historic Zoning District, Historic District (HZD-H) HISTORIC DISTRICT: East End REQUEST: Certificate of Appropriateness in order to add to rear of house and modify roof design. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with standard conditions EXHIBITS: A- Applicant's Submittal B- Galveston Historic Sites Inventory Sheet C- Photographs STAFF: Daniel Lunsford Planner 409-797-3659 [email protected] 1 Zoning and Land Use Location Zoning Land Use Subject Historic Zoning District, Historic Residential Site District (HZD-H) North Historic Zoning District, Historic Residential District (HZD-H) South Historic Zoning District, Historic Residential District (HZD-H) East Historic Zoning District, Historic Residential District (HZD-H) West Historic Zoning District, Historic Residential District (HZD-H) Date 1880 Historical and/or Style Folk Victorian Architectural Condition Excellent Significance Evaluation "Contributing" -contributes to the historical significance of the district through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association. Executive Summary The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new 13'x24' extension, with modification to the roof from hipped to gable. The materials will be as follows: Siding Wood siding and trim to match existing Windows Windows and trim to match existing. Roof The roof material will be composition shingle. Standards for New Additions on Residential Properties Design Standards for These Design Standards apply to the design of additions to existing structures. Historic Properties 2.23 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other roof top devices. Appropriate • Locate skylights below the ridge line of the roof (a skylight that is flush with the roof plane may be considered where it remains visually subordinate). Inappropriate • Do not interrupt the plane of the historic roof with a skylight. 2 2.47 Minimize the visual impacts of utility lines, junction boxes, and similar equipment. Appropriate • Locate utility lines and junction boxes on secondary walls and group them, when feasible. • Group lines in one conduit, when feasible. • Paint these elements to match the existing background color, when feasible. 3.34 Use building materials that are compatible with the surrounding context. Appropriate • Use wood siding with a weather-protective, painted finish, or masonry (brick, stone or genuine stucco) as the primary exterior building material (preferred approach). • Consider using alternative materials that are similar to traditional materials in scale, proportion, texture if they have proven durability in the local climate (i.e., cementious fiber board with a smooth finish) . Inappropriate • Do not use highly reflective materials such as glass or polished metal as a primary building material. 3.35 When using horizontal lap siding, ensure that it is applied in a manner similar to that seen historically. Appropriate • Use new siding that is similar to the lap exposure, texture and finish of traditional wood siding. • When using cementitious fiber board, use the Artisan product line by the James Hardie Company, or similar product. • When possible, use trim boards that show depth and typify high­ quality construction. Inappropriate • Do not use a finish that is out of character, such as a raised grain, or rusticated surface. 3.40 Design an addition to a historic residential structure to be clearly differentiated from the original structure. Appropriate Use a lower-scale connecting element to join an addition to a historic residential structure. Differentiate an addition from the historic original using changes in material, color and/or wall plane 3 3.41 Keep an addition to a historic residential structure simple in size, shape, materials, color and detail. Inappropriate Do not try to make an addition appear older than it is.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Persuaded to Prepare: Rhetoric and a Cold War Fallout Shelter
    PERSUADED TO PREPARE: RHETORIC AND A COLD WAR FALLOUT SHELTER By Carol M. Hollar-Zwick Between 1958 and 1962, at the height of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, a Wisconsin physician collected government pamphlets on civil defense, articles from medical journals and news magazines, and other information on radioactive fallout and fallout shelters. He assembled the documents in a three-ring binder, which he stored in the fallout shelter that he designed and had constructed in the back yard of his home in July 1960. The physician responded to a rhetoric of preparation from the federal and state governments and from his profession to prepare for nuclear war, a campaign of persuasive education that stood in for what would have been a tremendously expensive and less-than-guaranteed system of public shelters. Designed to induce American households to build private fallout shelters in their basements and yards, preparedness rhetoric combined fear of death in nuclear attack and assurance of survival through preparation. He was one of few who acted; most Americans throughout the 1950s ignored the government’s exhortations to do the same. The historical contexts of the documents, the way the documents reached the physician, the arguments the documents made, and his response to the arguments are discussed in this thesis. Using historical accounts, archival documents from the Wisconsin Bureau of Civil Defense and the State Board of Health, and bound volumes of medical journals and magazines, I place the binder documents in the historical contexts and rhetorical situations in which they were created and circulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehman Caves Management Plan
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Great Basin National Park Lehman Caves Management Plan June 2019 ON THE COVER Photograph of visitors on tour of Lehman Caves NPS Photo ON THIS PAGE Photograph of cave shields, Grand Palace, Lehman Caves NPS Photo Shields in the Grand Palace, Lehman Caves. Lehman Caves Management Plan Great Basin National Park Baker, Nevada June 2019 Approved by: James Woolsey, Superintendent Date Executive Summary The Lehman Caves Management Plan (LCMP) guides management for Lehman Caves, located within Great Basin National Park (GRBA). The primary goal of the Lehman Caves Management Plan is to manage the cave in a manner that will preserve and protect cave resources and processes while allowing for respectful recreation and scientific use. More specifically, the intent of this plan is to manage Lehman Caves to maintain its geological, scenic, educational, cultural, biological, hydrological, paleontological, and recreational resources in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and current guidelines such as the Federal Cave Resource Protection Act and National Park Service Management Policies. Section 1.0 provides an introduction and background to the park and pertinent laws and regulations. Section 2.0 goes into detail of the natural and cultural history of Lehman Caves. This history includes how infrastructure was built up in the cave to allow visitors to enter and tour, as well as visitation numbers from the 1920s to present. Section 3.0 states the management direction and objectives for Lehman Caves. Section 4.0 covers how the Management Plan will meet each of the objectives in Section 3.0.
    [Show full text]
  • IN TIME of EMERGENCY, a Citizen's Handbook on Nuclear Attack - Natural Disasters, Department of Defense (Dod), Office of Civil Defense, 1968
    Description of document: IN TIME OF EMERGENCY, a citizen's handbook on Nuclear Attack - Natural Disasters, Department of Defense (DoD), Office of Civil Defense, 1968 Posted date: 24-October-2016 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. This handbook is the property of: Name---------------------- Address Location of designated fallout shelter, or shelter nearest to: IIome ______________________ School ------------------­ Workplace----------------- Emergency telephone numbers:* Ambulance __________________ Civil Defense----------------- Doctors Fire IIealth Department --------------­ IIospitals ------------------ Police ______________________ Red Cross __________________ Utility Companies --------------- Weather Bureau----------------- Other _____________________ •Jn a time of nuclear attack or major natural disaster, don't use the telephone to get information or advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire, Franklin, Hampden and Hampshire County Csps.Pdf
    UMASS/AMHERST 312066 0361 4556 3 I COHMlin SHELTER CIVIL DEFENSE INFORMATION IN TIME OF INTERNATIONAL TENSION OR CRISIS CIVIL DEFENSE INFOMMffMN Omil Oft| INTERNATIONAL comnuinication-such ^M^Wspap^^ civil defense information to the people. Visitor& should make arrangements to return home if an attack seems probable. If you are warned of a nuclear attack, go to a public fallout shelter or to your home basement immediately, tune your battery powered radio \o a local station BERKSHIRE COUNTY and listen for additional information and instructions. HAMPDEN COUNTY Stay in shelter until you are advised by local government officials that it is safe to come out. FRANKUN COUNTY HMIPSiUREJ^UNTY Your local Civil Defense Director and other local public officiais, under the guidance of State and Federal Civil Defense Agencies, have been working for some time to develop the best plan for survival in the event of Nuclear Attack using presently available resources. The basements of many homes in this area, because of the substantial type of construction, will provide a degree of protection against radioactive fallout, with those persons not able to take shelter at home being provided space in public shelter. The Community Shelter Plan is Option I of the Nuclear Civil Protec - tion Program for Massachusetts and would be implemented if insufficient time was available for evacuating people from areas that would be subject to direct blast damage. Option II of the Nuclear Civil Protection Program provides instruc- tions on the relocation of people from the blast risk areas to the safer host areas and is known as the Crisis Relocation Plan , now being prepared You will be advised as to which part of the program to follow based on the international situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fallout Protection for Homes with Basements
    ' I I I i I I i' ! I I Ill 1 ' I I 1 I I I I II I ' I I I ' 'I FALLOUTI I : ' I ! I ; PROTECTION! . I . I I I I I 111! See i^cA eoi/^tn. ^ ^049te 'PtoteetUn^ ^acUn. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE • OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE JULY 1966 H-12 From the collection of the Prelinger a V £JJibrary San Francisco, California 2008 This booklet has been specially prepared for householders whose basement has been analyzed by electronic computer for fallout protection as a result of a questionnaire which was filled out describing the house and basement. FALLOUT PROTECTION FOR HOMES WITH BASEMENTS January 18, 1965 "It is already clear that with- out fallout shelter protection for our citizens, all defense weapons lose much of their ef- fectiveness in saving lives. This also appears to be the least expensive way of saving millions of lives, and the one which has clear value even without other systems. We will continue our existing pro- grams and start a program to increase the total inventory of shelters through a survey of private home and other small structures." President of United States Excerpt from the President's message to the Congress n~L ?^r^ THE FALLOUT PROTECTION IN YOUR HOME -^-tLT-z *-^ This booklet is about fallout protection. It will tell you what radioactive fallout is and how you can improve your protection against it if this country were ever attacked with nuclear weapons. But first of all, because your home has a basement, you already have some fallout protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Defense and Chemical Warfare in Great Britain, 1915-1945 Jordan I
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-7-2018 Britain Can Take It: Civil Defense and Chemical Warfare in Great Britain, 1915-1945 Jordan I. Malfoy [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC006585 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Malfoy, Jordan I., "Britain Can Take It: Civil Defense and Chemical Warfare in Great Britain, 1915-1945" (2018). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3639. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3639 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida BRITAIN CAN TAKE IT: CHEMICAL WARFARE AND THE ORIGINS OF CIVIL DEFENSE IN GREAT BRITAIN, 1915 - 1945 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY by Jordan Malfoy 2018 To: Dean John F. Stack, Jr. choose the name of dean of your college/school Green School of International and Public Affairs choose the name of your college/school This disserta tion, writte n by Jordan Malfoy, and entitled Britain Can Take It: Chemical Warfare and the Ori gins of Civil D efense i n Great Britain, 1915-1945, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guntersville Reservoir
    GUNTERSVILLE RESERVOIR Final Environmental Impact Statement and Reservoir Land Management Plan Volume I SEPTEMBER 2001 This page intentionally left blank Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: White Paper Project Name: Deeded Land Use Rights Project Number: 2009-57 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT RECOGNITION OF DEEDED ACCESS RIGHTS IN THREE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RESERVOIR LAND MANAGEMENT PLANS Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama; Norris Reservoir, Tennessee; and Pickwick Reservoir, Alabama PREPARED BY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY MARCH 2010 Prepared by: Richard L. Toennisson NEPA Compliance Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Phone: 865-632-8517 Fax: 865-632-3451 E-mail: [email protected] Page intentionally blank ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT RECOGNITION OF DEEDED ACCESS RIGHTS IN THREE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RESERVOIR LAND MANANAGEMENT PLANS GUNTERSVILLE RESERVOIR, ALABAMA; NORRIS RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE; AND PICKWICK RESERVOIR, ALABAMA TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY MARCH 2010 Issue The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) uses a land planning process to allocate individual parcels on its reservoir lands to one of six land use zones. After approval of a reservoir land management plan (LMP) by the TVA Board of Directors (TVA Board), all future uses of TVA lands on that reservoir must then be consistent with the allocations within that LMP. TVA’s Land Policy (TVA 2006) states that TVA may consider changing a land use designation outside of the normal planning process only for the purposes of providing water access for industrial or commercial recreation operations on privately owned back-lying land or to implement TVA’s Shoreline Management Policy (SMP). A change in allocation of any parcel is subject to approval by the TVA Board or its designee.
    [Show full text]
  • Fallout Shelter
    Fallout shelter From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search For the 2015 video game, see Fallout Shelter. A fallout shelter sign in the United States of America. Nuclear weapons Background Nuclear-armed states NPT recognized United States Russia United Kingdom France China Others India Israel (undeclared) Pakistan North Korea Former South Africa Belarus Kazakhstan Ukraine • v • t • e External video on RT Documentary Official YouTube Channel(in English) Armageddon Ready. The All-American race to get the swankiest survival shelter on YouTube A fallout shelter is an enclosed space specially designed to protect occupants from radioactive debris or fallout resulting from a nuclear explosion. Many such shelters were constructed as civil defense measures during the Cold War. During a nuclear explosion, matter vaporized in the resulting fireball is exposed to neutrons from the explosion, absorbs them, and becomes radioactive. When this material condenses in the rain, it forms dust and light sandy materials that resemble ground pumice. The fallout emits alpha and beta particles, as well as gamma rays. Much of this highly radioactive material falls to earth, subjecting anything within the line of sight to radiation, becoming a significant hazard. A fallout shelter is designed to allow its occupants to minimize exposure to harmful fallout until radioactivity has decayed to a safer level. Contents • 1History o 1.1North America o 1.2Europe and Russia ▪ 1.2.1Switzerland • 2Details of shelter construction o 2.1Shielding o 2.2Climate control o 2.3Locations o 2.4Contents ▪ 2.4.1Kearny fallout meter • 3Use • 4Different types of radiation emitted by fallout o 4.1Alpha (α) o 4.2Beta (β) o 4.3Gamma (γ) • 5Weapons versus nuclear accident fallout • 6Other matters and simple improvements o 6.1Measures to lower the beta dose o 6.2Measures to lower the gamma dose rate • 7Fallout shelters in popular culture • 8See also • 9Notes and references • 10External links History[edit] Idealized American fallout shelter, around 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Defense and the Effects of Nuclear War Ip0174c
    Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540 CIVIL DEFENSE AND THE EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR WAR IP0174C We have received an increasing number of requests for information on the United States civil defense program and on the effects of nuclear war. This Info Pack contains material on nuclear weapons and on the anticipated physical, economic, and social consequences of nuclear attacks on the United States, basic information on the civil defense program, and material discussing some of the arguments, pro and con, surrounding the civil defense issue. Those wishing more specific information on the civil defense program should write to: Federal Emergency Management Agency Office of Public Affairs 1725 I Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20472 We hope this information is helpful. Congressional Reference Division March 12, 1982 This paper outlines the Fiscal Year 1983 civil defense program requested by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which is responsible for emergency-related programs spanning the full range of mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery--in peace or war. Revital ized Civi 1 Defense Program Fol lowing the Administration's review of civi1 defense programs and pol i - cies, President Reagan, on October 2, 1981, announced his intention to "devote greater resources to improving our civil defenses," as part of his plan "to re- vitalize our strategic forces and maintain America's ability to keep the peace we1 1 into the next century." The fundamental purposes of the National Civil Defense Program are : (1) Tn save American li~cin the event of a nuclear attack. It will save 1ives by a lspers I ng people into rural areas where they will be least affected by the blast and thermal effects of the nuclear explosions, leaving radiation as the major hazard for the dispersed population.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the US Army Corps of Engineers
    History of the US Army Corps of Engineers Course No: B07-002 Credit: 7 PDH Robert Steelhammer, P.E. Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: A History Headquarters U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Office of History Alexandria, Virginia 2008 This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of ISBN 978-0-16-079585-5 is for U.S. Government Printing Office Official Editions only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. It is prohibited to use the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers seal, as it appears on the cover, on any republication of this material without the express, written permission of the Office of History, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Any person using official seals and logos in a manner inconsistent with the Federal Regulations Act is subject to penalty. Foreword his illustrated history of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers provides an overview of many of the missions that engineers have performed in support of the U.S. Army and the Nation since the early days of the T American Revolution. A permanent institution since 1802, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has effect- ively and proudly responded to changing defense requirements and has played an integral part in the development of the Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Alert Today, Alive Tomorrow: the North Carolina Civil Defense Agency and Fallout Shelters, 1961-1963
    ABSTRACT BLAZICH, FRANK ARTHUR. Alert Today, Alive Tomorrow: The North Carolina Civil Defense Agency and Fallout Shelters, 1961-1963. (Under the direction of Nancy Mitchell.) From 1961 to 1963, the administration of President John F. Kennedy attempted to create a vast network of public and private fallout shelters across the United States. The North Carolina Civil Defense Agency (NCCD) during this period focused instead on emergency preparedness. Fallout shelters were a façade, providing funding that allowed the NCCD to quietly focus its efforts on emergency preparedness. While the state managed to provide fallout shelters for only eight percent of the population, this failure was not as damning as most scholars have assumed. In fact, the state agency used available federal funding to prepare the state for natural disasters and isolated, minor emergencies. State civil defense officials implemented improvements in communication networks, emergency rescue squads, and the professionalizing of fire and police departments state-wide. Citizens did not criticize the civil defense agency in North Carolina; following the Cuban Missile Crisis, there was no public backlash against the state agency. The crisis, on the contrary, validated the state’s approach to civil defense. By focusing on emergency preparedness instead of investing in fallout shelters, local civil defense agencies were able to operate in accordance with the specific demographic, geographic, and financial needs of the county residents. Most people assume that the fading yellow and black “Fallout Shelter” signs are the only residue of the civil defense program in North Carolina. In fact, the professional development of the state’s rescue squads, police and fire departments harkens back to the efforts of civil defense offices in the early 1960s.
    [Show full text]