Student Nationality by Geographical Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Student Nationality by Geographical Region Student December 10 Nationality by Geographical 2013 Region This report contains information pertaining to student nationality and Office of student country of origin analysis. Student nationalities were condensed and Institutional categorized under 5 broad regional categories: Africa, Americas, Asia, Europe, and Oceania. Each geographical region was disaggregated by sub-regions and Research and country by sub-region. Assessment The Nationality by Geographical Region report was created to highlight the nationalities of our student population since fall 2010. In order to present a cohesive report on student nationalities that isn’t bogged down by too much detail, the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment condensed the data by creating broader categories, or geographical regions that individual nations can be grouped under. These geographical regions are consistent with the United Nations Geoscheme by the United Nations Statistics division. The United Nations Statistics Division has divided the world into macro- geographical regions and sub-regions based on M49 coding classification. These geographical codes were incorporated into the report to prevent subjectivity in a field that is highly sensitive to outside reviewers. The M49 coding in its most condensed form is as follows: 002 Africa 014 Eastern Africa 017 Middle Africa 015 Northern Africa 018 Southern Africa 011 Western Africa 019 Americas 419 Latin America and the Caribbean 029 Caribbean 013 Central America 005 South America 021 Northern America 142 Asia 143 Central Asia 030 Eastern Asia 034 Southern Asia 035 South-Eastern Asia 145 Western Asia 150 Europe 151 Eastern Europe 154 Northern Europe 039 Southern Europe 155 Western Europe 009 Oceania 053 Australia and New Zealand 054 Melanesia 057 Micronesia 061 Polynesia This report will present data at the highest aggregate of the student body (total student population), which includes degree-seeking and non-degree seeking students. This aggregate repot was further broken down into degree-seeking students, degree-seeking students by degree level, and degree- seeking students by academic major. The segment of the report that deals with the total student population aggregate was broken down by geographical region, and country by geographical region. The portion of the report that is devoted to degree-seeking students only was broken down by degree level, and academic majors. This report can serve many purposes and can be very informative to many departments at University of the West. In order to further serve our mission that highlights the “whole-person,” East-West,” and “diversity,” we need to ensure that our students are given the opportunity to practice these values that derive from our mission. The demographic composition of our student body is one factor that can contribute to a student’s exposure, understanding and acceptance of our mission. Secondly, this report can benefit our recruiting efforts by pinpointing which geographical regions have student enrollment increased, which geographical regions have student enrollment decreased, and lastly, which geographical regions or sub-regions have still been untapped by our marketing efforts. Lastly, this report includes a few mathematical equations. These equations were used to calculate linear growth rates and average annual growth rates between fall 2010 and fall 2013. Linear growth rates were tabulated for both student headcount and for the ratio of student segments to the total student population figures. Calculating a growth rate for student headcount illustrates the percentage increase in student enrollment over time. Note that this mathematical equation becomes obsolete when zero is included. Thus, N/A or not applicable will be inserted whenever headcount figures are zero. Calculating growth rates for ratios and percentages is more dynamic in that it includes the overall growth rate into its calculation. For example, our Asian student population might have increased by 38% since 2010, however, as a percentage of the total student population they had actually declined by -14%. This output is telling us that a different student segment is growing faster than the Asian student population, and that Asian students are making up less of our student population. Data Analysis Total Student Headcount: Students from the Americas (117%) and Europe (133%, 3- 7) exhibited the biggest increase since 2010. Additionally, students from the Americas now represent nearly 39% of our total student population (36% increase since 2010), and students from Europe make up nearly 2% (a 46% increase since fall 2010). The Asian student population increased by 38% since 2010; however, as a percentage of the total population, they decreased from 67% to 58% (-14% change). Africa was the only geographical region that saw a decrease in the number of students enrolled since fall 2010, albeit, only by one student. Asia by geographical Region: Four Asian sub-regions saw an increase in student enrollment since 2010; however, Central Asia remained constant at one student. The number of students from South-Eastern Asia and Western Asia experienced the largest increase since 2010, 90% and 400% (1 5) respectfully. Southern Asia grew by only 10% since 2010, after Central Asia that is the second slowest growth rate for any student segment in Asia. South Eastern Asia increased as a percentage of the region, increasing from 14% to 19% (+39%). Eastern Asia by Country: The number of students from China and Taiwan increased by +43% and 26% respectfully. The number of Korean students decreased since fall 2010 (-40%). Chinas as a percentage of the Eastern Asia region gained the most ground since fall 2010, increasing its share of the pie by nearly +11%. Southern Asia by Country: India and Nepal both experienced a decrease in the number of students since fall 2010. The number of students from Sri Lanka increased by nearly +350% since fall 2010. Additionally, Sri Lankan students now make up 82% of the total students coming from Southern Asia. South Eastern Asia by Country: Thailand (+300%) and Vietnam (129%) both experienced a strong increase in the number of students enrolled. In 2010, Thai students represented only 14% of the total students from South Eastern Asia; they now own 30% of the pie (+110%). Western Asia by Country: The number of students from Western Asia increase from 1 in fall 2010 to 5 in fall 2013. Our Western Asian students come from Iran and Qatar. Americas by Sub-region: A student from the Caribbean’s has never enrolled at UWest. The number of students from Central America increased from 0 in fall 2010, to 9 in fall 2013. This was mostly due to the number of Mexican students that enrolled (0 8 in three years). The number of students from North America increased by +103% since fall 2010. U.S. citizens increased by +103% since 2010, by far the largest increase of any sub-group. Europe by Region: The number of students from Europe increased from 3 to 7 students since fall 2010. However, we actually had more European students enrolled in fall 2012 than we do now in 2013. Students from Northern and Southern Europe witnessed the only increase of this region. Degree Seeking Students Nationality by Geographical Region: The number of students from the Americas increased by +121% since 2010, and they now represent nearly 46% of the total degree-seeking student population (+43%). This increase was largely due to an increase in the number of undergraduate students that enrolled from the Americas. Since fall 2010, 33 new students from the Americas enrolled as undergraduate students. That is a 236% increase, by far the largest increase of any group (not including student segments with an initial enrollment that was less than 10 students) at UWest since fall 2010. The number of students from Asia increased by 25% since fall 2010; However, the number of Asian students as a percentage of the total degree-seeking student population decreased by -19% since fall 2010. They now make up only 51% of the population compared to 63% in fall 2010. In 2010, Asian students represented nearly 70% of undergraduate students, and the Americas accounted for 29% of the population. However, in 2013, the Asian student population now only represents 40% of the undergraduate student population, and the Americas now account for nearly 60% of the pie. From fall 2010 to fall 2013, we did not have one student from Africa or the Oceana region enroll as an undergraduate student at UWest, and we had only 1 European student enroll in 2010. The number of African students enrolled in graduate level programs decreased since fall 2010. Since fall 2010, African students have enrolled in graduate level courses only (zero have enrolled neither in undergraduate level programs nor as an NDS status). The number of students from the Americas and Asia increased 87% and 38% respectfully. However, the proportion of Asian students to degree-seeking students has decreased from 61% to 55% since fall 2010 (-10%). This was caused by the growing number of students from the Americas, Europe, and to an extent, the Oceania region Degree-Seeking Students by Geographical Region and Country: The number of students from China increased from 50 to 64 since fall 2010 (+28%). The number of Taiwanese students decreased from 28 to 19 in 2011; however, we witnessed a slight increase in 2012 and 2013 of Taiwanese students since fall 2011. The number of South Korean students decreased from 8 to 5 since 2010 (-38%). We now have zero students from Nepal compared to 4 students in 2010. In 2010, 4 Indian students were enrolled, but now, we have only 1 Indian student. In 2013, we had our first Iranian students enroll. From 2010 to 2013 we did not have a student from Pakistan. Students from Sri Lanka increased from 2 in 2010 to 9 in 2013 (+350%). Out of all the Asian regions, South Eastern Asia witnessed the largest increase in student enrollment since 2010 (85%).
Recommended publications
  • Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia: Key Trends in the Agrifood Sector
    Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia and Jordan - and Jordan Tunisia Morocco, Egypt, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia Key trends in the agrifood sector in the agrifood Key trends Key trends in the agrifood sector Please address comments and inquiries to: Investment Centre Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla – 00153 Rome, Italy [email protected] 22 Report No. www.fao.org/investment/en Report No. 22 - September 2015 I4897E/2/11.15 Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia Key trends in the agrifood sector Nuno Santos Economist, Investment Centre Division, FAO Iride Ceccacci Food Security Economist, EBRD COUNTRY HIGHLIGHTS prepared under the FAO/EBRD Cooperation FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or the EBRD in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or the EBRD.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritizing African Languages: Challenges to Macro-Level Planning for Resourcing and Capacity Building
    Prioritizing African Languages: Challenges to macro-level planning for resourcing and capacity building Tristan M. Purvis Christopher R. Green Gregory K. Iverson University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language Abstract This paper addresses key considerations and challenges involved in the process of prioritizing languages in an area of high linguistic di- versity like Africa alongside other world regions. The paper identifies general considerations that must be taken into account in this process and reviews the placement of African languages on priority lists over the years and across different agencies and organizations. An outline of factors is presented that is used when organizing resources and planning research on African languages that categorizes major or crit- ical languages within a framework that allows for broad coverage of the full linguistic diversity of the continent. Keywords: language prioritization, African languages, capacity building, language diversity, language documentation When building language capacity on an individual or localized level, the question of which languages matter most is relatively less complicated than it is for those planning and providing for language capabilities at the macro level. An American anthropology student working with Sierra Leonean refugees in Forecariah, Guinea, for ex- ample, will likely know how to address and balance needs for lan- guage skills in French, Susu, Krio, and a set of other languages such as Temne and Mandinka. An education official or activist in Mwanza, Tanzania, will be concerned primarily with English, Swahili, and Su- kuma. An administrator of a grant program for Less Commonly Taught Languages, or LCTLs, or a newly appointed language authori- ty for the United States Department of Education, Department of Commerce, or U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal in Entirety
    Fall 2017 • vol. 72, no. 2 published by the faculty of asbury theological seminary seminary theological of asbury the faculty published by The Asbury Journal Fall 2017 Vol. 72, No. 2 TheAsbui ournal EDITOR Robert Danielson EDITORIAL BOARD Kenneth J. Collins Professor of Historical Theology and Wesley Studies J. Steven O’Malley Professor of Methodist Holiness History EDITORIAL ADVISORY PANEL William Abraham, Perkins School of Theology David Bundy, New York Theological Seminary Ted Campbell, Perkins School of Theology Hyungkeun Choi, Seoul Theological University Richard Heitzenrater, Duke University Divinity School Scott Kisker, Wesley Theological Seminary Sarah Lancaster, Methodist Theological School of Ohio Gareth Lloyd, University of Manchester Randy Maddox, Duke University Divinity School Nantachai Medjuhon, Muang Thai Church, Bangkok, Thailand Stanley Nwoji, Pastor, Lagos, Nigeria Paul Numrich, Theological Consortium of Greater Columbus Dana Robert, Boston University Howard Snyder, Manchester Wesley Research Centre L. Wesley de Souza, Candler School of Theology Leonard Sweet, Drew University School of Theology Amos Yong, Regent University Hwa Yung, United Methodist Church, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia All inquiries regarding subscriptions, back issues, permissions to reprint, manuscripts for submission, and books for review should be addressed to: The Asbury Journal Asbury Theological Seminary 204 N. Lexington Avenue, Wilmore, KY 40390 FAX: 859-858-2375 http://place.asburyseminary.edu/asburyjournal/ © Copyright 2017 by Asbury Theological Seminary ISSN 1090-5642 The Asbury Journal VOLUME 72:2 Fall 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 From the President 8 A Singular Israel in a Pluralistic World Bill T. Arnold 21 A Prophet Like Moses? Who or Why? Daniel I. Block 35 Seeing Double: An Iconographic Reading of Genesis 2-3 Christina Bosserman 51 Paganism, Wesley, and the Means of Grace Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Security Environment
    Supreme Allied Commander, Transformation Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2490 United States of America ENCLOSURE 1 TO 3000 SC-6/Ser: NU0369 DATED 13 Jun 2007 FUTURE SECURITY ENVIRONMENT (FSE) First Edition FSE 2025 The Future Security Environment (FSE) is produced by the Intelligence Sub-Division, Headquarters, Supreme Allied Command Transformation (HQ SACT). If you would like to get in touch with the FSE team, contact: NATO HQ SACT, Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2490, United States of America. Tel +1 757 747 3537, fax +1 757 747 3914 E-mail mailto:[email protected] Alternatively you can visit the ACT website at: http://www.act.nato.int/ First Edition - Published March 2007. 2 1st Edition FSE 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 6 ALLIANCE – FROM COLD WAR TO COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH .......... 6 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 9 AIM ........................................................................................................................ 9 SCOPE .................................................................................................................. 9 SOURCES .......................................................................................................... 10 METHOD ............................................................................................................. 10 FUTURE SECURITY ENVIRONMENT – MAIN DRIVERS AND TRENDS ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Multilateral Approach Towards Education: the Case of the East African Community
    A multilateral approach towards education: the case of the East African Community -Master Final Thesis- Author: Giorgio Teresi Tutor: Miguel Angel Elizalde Carranza CEI INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Nº 6/2019, 23 DE OCTUBRE DE 2019 OCTUBRE DE 2019 COLECCIÓN TRABAJOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN DEL MÁSTER EN DIPLOMACIA Y FUNCIÓN PÚBLICA INTERNACIONAL Hand-in date: April 19th, 2018 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1. EDUCATION AND MULTILATERALISM: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ....... 3 1.1 Education as the basis of a society .................................................................................. 3 1.2 Multilateralism in the 21st century ................................................................................. 5 1.3 Conceptualising education after World War II: from an exclusively domestic affair to a transversal and multilateral issue ...................................................................................... 7 1.4 Education and UNESCO’s effectiveness in the last six decades.................................... 9 1.5 Education and multilateralism: a mutual relation ....................................................... 13 1.6 A brief insight into the regional implementation of multilateral education in the world: the influence o the European model across the world ........................................... 14 2. ANALYSIS OF THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY ................................................ 19 2.1 Regional integration
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Global Governance: the Role of Civil Society Organizations 2 Tom Fries, Peter Walkenhorst 3 with a Foreword by Jan Eliasson
    Tom Fries, Peter Walkenhorst With a foreword by Jan Eliasson Sharing Global Governance: The Role of Civil Society Organizations 2 Tom Fries, Peter Walkenhorst 3 With a foreword by Jan Eliasson Sharing Global Governance: The Role of Civil Society Organizations 4 Foreword The forces of globalization have changed the world fundamentally, and this change has accelerated in recent decades. As a result of these transformations, the world has become much more interconnected and interdependent. We work and feel increasingly like “a global village”. At the same time, the globalized world faces new challenges such as climate change, environmental degradation, poverty, pandemics and economic crises. These challenges respect no borders and cannot be solved by any country working alone. They require urgent and coordinated responses across the globe by a multiplicity of stakeholders. Yet, it is increasingly obvious that our current instruments of international problem-solving are insufficient to cope with these problems. We must ask how we can organize our political processes and institutions so that they can effectively and fairly deal with both local and global challenges. Clearly, the problems we face today are of such magnitude and complexity that they can be solved only by coordinated action. Therefore, we need more effective forms of collaboration between international organizations, governments, the private sector, the academic world and civil society. As UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon pointed out in his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2009: “Our times demand a new definition of leadership – global leadership. They demand a new constellation of international cooperation – governments, civil society and the private sector, working together for a collective global good.”1 “Our times demand a new definition of leadership – While this call for new forms of cooperation applies to all global global leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCAP Framework Agreement Cover-2-4.Indd
    FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON FACILITATION OF CROSS-BORDER PAPERLESS TRADE IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC The shaded areas of the map indicate ESCAP members and associate members.* The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacifi c (ESCAP) serves as the United Nations’ regional hub promoting cooperation among countries to achieve inclusive and sustainable development. The largest regional intergovernmental platform with 53 Member States and 9 Associate Members, ESCAP has emerged as a strong regional think-tank offering countries sound analytical products that shed insight into the evolving economic, social and environmental dynamics of the region. The Commission’s strategic focus is to deliver on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which it does by reinforcing and deepening regional cooperation and integration to advance connectivity, fi nancial cooperation and market integration. ESCAP’s research and analysis coupled with its policy advisory services, capacity building and technical assistance to governments aims to support countries’ sustainable and inclusive development ambitions. FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON FACILITATION OF CROSS-BORDER PAPERLESS TRADE IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON FACILITATION OF CROSS-BORDER PAPERLESS TRADE IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC United Nations Publications Trade and Investment Division ESCAP Bangkok, Thailand Copyright © United Nations 2019 All rights reserved Manufactured in Thailand For further information on this publication, please contact: Mia Mikic Director Trade and Investment Division United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific United Nations Building Rajadamnern Nok Avenue Bangkok 10200, Thailand Email: [email protected] This publication contains the full text of Framework Agreement on Facilitation of Cross- border Paperless Trade in Asia and the Pacific, adopted by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, on 19 May 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • World Youth Report
    WORLD YOUTH REPORT YOUTH AND THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WORLD YOUTH REPORT YOUTH AND THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WORLD YOUTH REPORT YOUTH AND THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT UNITED NATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS NEW YORK, 2018 World Youth Report Published by the United Nations New York, New York 10017 United States of America United Nations Publication Sales No.: E.18.IV.7 ISBN: 978-92-1-130349-0 eISBN: 978-92-1-363256-7 Copyright © United Nations, 2018 All rights reserved All queries or rights and licenses including subsidiary rights should be addressed to United Nations Publications, 405 E. 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, United States of America; email: [email protected]; website: un.org/publications. Note: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers. The term “country” as used in the text of the present report also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. The designations of country groups in the text and the tables are intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of the names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations. Technical Note: In this publication, unless otherwise indicated, the term “youth” refers to all those between the ages of 15 and 24, as reflected in the World Programme of Action for Youth.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in West Africa: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kerlly J
    International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 50 (2017) 629–639 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijantimicag Review Antimicrobial resistance in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis Kerlly J. Bernabé a, Céline Langendorf b, Nathan Ford c, Jean-Baptiste Ronat d, Richard A. Murphy e,* a Doctors Without Borders, New York, NY, USA b Epicentre, Paris, France c University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa d Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France e Division of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W. Carson Street, Box 466, Torrance, CA 90509, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Growing data suggest that antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections are common in low- and middle- Received 7 February 2017 income countries. This review summarises the microbiology of key bacterial syndromes encountered in Accepted 1 July 2017 West Africa and estimates the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) that could compromise first- line empirical treatment. We systematically searched for studies reporting on the epidemiology of bacterial Keywords: infection and prevalence of AMR in West Africa within key clinical syndromes. Within each syndrome, Antimicrobial agents the pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval were calculated for each pathogen–antibiotic pair using Drug resistance random-effects models. Among 281 full-text articles reviewed, 120 met the eligibility criteria. The ma- West Africa jority of studies originated from Nigeria (70; 58.3%), Ghana (15; 12.5%) and Senegal (15; 12.5%). Overall, 43 studies (35.8%) focused on urinary tract infections (UTI), 38 (31.7%) on bloodstream infections (BSI), 27 (22.5%) on meningitis, 7 (5.8%) on diarrhoea and 5 (4.2%) on pneumonia.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme the United Nations
    Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme The United Nations Geoscheme divides the world into regions and sub-regions. This assignment is for statistical convenience and does not imply any assumption regarding political or other affiliation of countries or territories. Table 1. United Nations Geoscheme (data from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/) Region Sub-region Countries and Territories Africa Northern Africa Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia, Western Sahara Eastern Africa British Indian Ocean Territory, Burundi, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, French Southern Territories, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mozambique, Réunion, Rwanda, Seychelles, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe Middle Africa Angola, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Sao Tome and Principe Southern Africa Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa Western Africa Benin, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Helena, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo Americas Latin America and the Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Bonaire, Sint Caribbean Eustatius and Saba, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Puerto Rico, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Martin (French Part),
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Annex
    STATISTICAL ANNEX CONTENTS PART 1: YOUTH-RELATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL INDICATORS .................. 137 PART 2: WORLD PROGRAMME OF ACTION FOR YOUTH INDICATORS ........................ 210 TABLES FOR PART 1: YOUTH-RELATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL INDICATORS .................. 137 GOAL 1 END POVERTY IN ALL ITS FORMS EVERYWHERE ����������������������������������� 138 Indicator 1.1.1 Proportion of population below the international poverty line, by sex, age, employment status and geographical location (urban/rural) ......................... 138 Indicator 1.2.1 Proportion of population living below the national poverty line, by sex and age ............. 140 Indicator 1.2.2 Proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions ......................................... 140 Indicator 1.3.1 Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, newborns, work-injury victims and the poor and the vulnerable ........... 141 Indicator 1.5.1 Number of deaths, missing persons and directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population ............................................... 144 Indicator 1.a.2 Proportion of total government spending on essential services (education, health and social protection) ��������������������������������������������������� 144 Indicator 1.b.1 Proportion of government recurrent and capital spending
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Faces of Justice: Legal Traditions, Legal Transplants, and Customary Justice in a Multicultural World
    THE THREE FACES OF JUSTICE: LEGAL TRADITIONS, LEGAL TRANSPLANTS, AND CUSTOMARY JUSTICE IN A MULTICULTURAL WORLD by JUAN CARLOS BOTERO A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.) at the Georgetown University Law Center 2013 i Copyright by Juan Carlos Botero 2013 ii Abstract This research explores the institutional and procedural architecture that enables or limits access to formal and informal dispute settlement mechanisms to resolve simple disputes among individuals in developing countries. The central argument is that the urban poor (including newly arrived migrant peasants and members of indigenous communities) in developing countries, are unable to keep their traditions and ancestral dispute settlement mechanisms alive in big cities, while they are also unable to understand and utilize what to them are abstruse legal procedures of the formal courts. A proposal is made at the end of the dissertation, which includes a novel conceptual framework to analyze the problem of deficient delivery of justice (formal and customary) to the urban poor, and a methodology to quantify the multiple dimensions of the same problem in low and middle-income countries throughout the world. The contribution of this work is: first, a new conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of formal and informal justice in developed and developing countries. Second, to expand knowledge on the uneasy interaction among legal traditions, legal transplants and customary justice in the multicultural world of the XXI century. Third, a descriptive analysis of a chronic problem which affects billions of people, i.e., the lack of effective access to justice (formal or customary) for the urban poor in low and middle-income countries.
    [Show full text]