DOCSLIB.ORG

World Public Sector Report 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Public Sector Report 2019 The 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) prominently feature institutions, both as a cross-cutting issue in many of the goals and as a standalone goal (SDG 16). The World Public Sector Report 2019 looks at national-level developments in relation to several concepts highlighted in the targets of Goal 16, which are viewed as institutional principles: access to information, transparency, accountability, anti-corruption, inclusiveness of decision-making processes, and non-discrimination. The report surveys global trends in these areas, documenting both the availability of information on those trends and the status of knowledge about the effectiveness of related policies and institutional arrangements in different national contexts. It also demonstrates how the institutional principles of SDG 16 have been informing the development of institutions in various areas, including gender World Public Sector Report 2019 United Nations Sector Report Public World equality and women’s empowerment (SDG 5). The report further examines two critical instruments that can support effective public institutions and public administration for the SDGs, namely national budget processes and risk management. The World Public Sector Report 2019 aims to inform the first review of SDG 16 at the United Nations high-level political forum on sustainable development in July 2019, and to contribute to future efforts to monitor progress on SDG 16. By reviewing key challenges and opportunities for public institutions in the context of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda at the national level, the report also aims to inform efforts by all countries to create effective institutions to deliver the Sustainable Development Goals. ISBN: 978-92-1-123209-7 eISBN: 978-92-1-004140-9 Published by the United Nations June 2019 UNITED NATIONS WORLD PUBLIC SECTOR REPORT 2019 Sustainable Development Goal 16: Focus on public institutions For more information, please visit: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs http://www.un.org/desa United Nations Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government https://publicadministration.un.org United Nations World Public Sector Reports https://publicadministration.un.org/en/Research/World-Public-Sector-Reports Sustainable Development Goal 16: Focus on public institutions | i Department of Economic and Social Affairs SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 16: FOCUS ON PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS World Public Sector Report 2019 United Nations New York, 2019 publicadministration.un.org ii | World Public Sector Report 2019 DESA Mission Statement The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres of sustainable development and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Disclaimer The terms ‘country’ and ‘economy’ as used in this Report refer, as appropriate, to territories or areas; the designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In addition, the designations of country groups are intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not express a judgement about the stage of development reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Reference to companies and their activities should not be construed as an endorsement by the United Nations of those companies or their activities. The boundaries and names shown and designations used on the maps presented in this publication do not imply official endorsement of acceptance by the United Nations. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations or its senior management, or of the experts whose contributions are acknowledged. Copyright © United Nations, 2019. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission. Publication No.: ST/ESA/PAD/SER.E/200 ISBN: 978-92-1-123209-7 eISBN: 978-92-1-004140-9 Sales no.: E.19.II.H.1 Suggested citation: United Nations, 2019, Sustainable Development Goal 16: Focus on public institutions, World Public Sector Report 2019, Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, June. Website: publicadministration.un.org Printed at the United Nations, New York Foreword Sustainable Development Goal 16: Focus on public institutions | iii Foreword Institutions are essential to the achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and all the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The strengthening of national institutions to deliver the SDGs is seen as a priority in many Member States, as shown by their voluntary presentations at the United Nations High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development during the first three years of SDG follow-up and review. The 2030 Agenda and the SDGs prominently feature institutions, both as a cross-cutting issue in many of the goals and as a standalone goal (SDG 16), “Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels”. The principles highlighted in SDG 16 in relation to institutions – effectiveness, transparency, accountability, anti-corruption, inclusiveness of decision-making processes, access to information, non-discrimination – apply to all the Goals. The very first review of SDG 16 at the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development in July 2019 is a momentous occasion. It will provide all Member States of the United Nations a platform to reflect on the adequacy and effectiveness of existing societal and institutional arrangements for supporting the implementation of the Goals. The World Public Sector Report 2019 aims to inform this reflection. It surveys trends in relation to the institutional principles of SDG 16, both at the systemic level and in relation to Goal 5 on gender equality, and presents what is known about the effectiveness of initiatives in these areas in different national contexts. The report also looks at two critical tools that can support effective public institutions and public administration, namely national budget processes and risk management. Along with reports that have examined other facets of SDG 16, this initial stocktaking provides a base on which future efforts to monitor progress on SDG 16 can build. By reviewing key challenges and opportunities for public institutions in the context of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda at the national level, the report also aims to inform efforts by all countries to create effective institutions to deliver the SDGs. LIU Zhenmin Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs United Nations iv | World Public Sector Report 2019 Acknowledgements Authors The World Public Sector Report 2019 was prepared by the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations (UNDESA), through its Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government (DPIDG). The report was prepared under the responsibility of Juwang Zhu, by a team of United Nations staff led by David Le Blanc. The team comprised Lisa Ainbinder, Peride K. Blind, Xinxin Cai, Aránzazu Guillán Montero, David Lung’aho, Julie Powell and Valentina Resta. DPIDG interns Néstor de Buen Alatorre, Lily Chan, Sofia Chrysikopoulou, Omar Dammak, Emmanuel Ebot, Omar El Hefnawy, Rafia Farooqui, Siyu Gu, Ying Huang, Shihao Lin, Bruno Viale and United Nations Volunteer Aurora Morandi provided research support. Chapter 1 was coordinated by David Le Blanc. Inputs for this chapter were provided by Lisa Ainbinder and Julie Powell. Aránzazu Guillán Montero coordinated and wrote Chapter 2. Chapter 3 was written by Lisa Ainbinder, Aránzazu Guillán Montero and David Le Blanc. The chapter benefitted from discussions at an Expert Group Meeting on “Budgeting and planning in support of effective institutions for the Sustainable Development Goals”, held on 4-5 February 2019 in New York, and drew extensively on inputs prepared by the following experts for that workshop: Thomas Beloe (United Nations Development Programme); Juan Pablo Guerrero (Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency); Christopher Mihm (United States Government Accountability Office); Yamini Mishra (Amnesty International); Delphine Moretti (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development); Stephen Masha Ngowa (Government of Kenya); Katarina Ott (Institute of Public Finance, Croatia); and Claire
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia: Key Trends in the Agrifood Sector
    Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia and Jordan - and Jordan Tunisia Morocco, Egypt, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia Key trends in the agrifood sector in the agrifood Key trends Key trends in the agrifood sector Please address comments and inquiries to: Investment Centre Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla – 00153 Rome, Italy [email protected] 22 Report No. www.fao.org/investment/en Report No. 22 - September 2015 I4897E/2/11.15 Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia Key trends in the agrifood sector Nuno Santos Economist, Investment Centre Division, FAO Iride Ceccacci Food Security Economist, EBRD COUNTRY HIGHLIGHTS prepared under the FAO/EBRD Cooperation FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or the EBRD in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or the EBRD.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritizing African Languages: Challenges to Macro-Level Planning for Resourcing and Capacity Building
    Prioritizing African Languages: Challenges to macro-level planning for resourcing and capacity building Tristan M. Purvis Christopher R. Green Gregory K. Iverson University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language Abstract This paper addresses key considerations and challenges involved in the process of prioritizing languages in an area of high linguistic di- versity like Africa alongside other world regions. The paper identifies general considerations that must be taken into account in this process and reviews the placement of African languages on priority lists over the years and across different agencies and organizations. An outline of factors is presented that is used when organizing resources and planning research on African languages that categorizes major or crit- ical languages within a framework that allows for broad coverage of the full linguistic diversity of the continent. Keywords: language prioritization, African languages, capacity building, language diversity, language documentation When building language capacity on an individual or localized level, the question of which languages matter most is relatively less complicated than it is for those planning and providing for language capabilities at the macro level. An American anthropology student working with Sierra Leonean refugees in Forecariah, Guinea, for ex- ample, will likely know how to address and balance needs for lan- guage skills in French, Susu, Krio, and a set of other languages such as Temne and Mandinka. An education official or activist in Mwanza, Tanzania, will be concerned primarily with English, Swahili, and Su- kuma. An administrator of a grant program for Less Commonly Taught Languages, or LCTLs, or a newly appointed language authori- ty for the United States Department of Education, Department of Commerce, or U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal in Entirety
    Fall 2017 • vol. 72, no. 2 published by the faculty of asbury theological seminary seminary theological of asbury the faculty published by The Asbury Journal Fall 2017 Vol. 72, No. 2 TheAsbui ournal EDITOR Robert Danielson EDITORIAL BOARD Kenneth J. Collins Professor of Historical Theology and Wesley Studies J. Steven O’Malley Professor of Methodist Holiness History EDITORIAL ADVISORY PANEL William Abraham, Perkins School of Theology David Bundy, New York Theological Seminary Ted Campbell, Perkins School of Theology Hyungkeun Choi, Seoul Theological University Richard Heitzenrater, Duke University Divinity School Scott Kisker, Wesley Theological Seminary Sarah Lancaster, Methodist Theological School of Ohio Gareth Lloyd, University of Manchester Randy Maddox, Duke University Divinity School Nantachai Medjuhon, Muang Thai Church, Bangkok, Thailand Stanley Nwoji, Pastor, Lagos, Nigeria Paul Numrich, Theological Consortium of Greater Columbus Dana Robert, Boston University Howard Snyder, Manchester Wesley Research Centre L. Wesley de Souza, Candler School of Theology Leonard Sweet, Drew University School of Theology Amos Yong, Regent University Hwa Yung, United Methodist Church, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia All inquiries regarding subscriptions, back issues, permissions to reprint, manuscripts for submission, and books for review should be addressed to: The Asbury Journal Asbury Theological Seminary 204 N. Lexington Avenue, Wilmore, KY 40390 FAX: 859-858-2375 http://place.asburyseminary.edu/asburyjournal/ © Copyright 2017 by Asbury Theological Seminary ISSN 1090-5642 The Asbury Journal VOLUME 72:2 Fall 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 From the President 8 A Singular Israel in a Pluralistic World Bill T. Arnold 21 A Prophet Like Moses? Who or Why? Daniel I. Block 35 Seeing Double: An Iconographic Reading of Genesis 2-3 Christina Bosserman 51 Paganism, Wesley, and the Means of Grace Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Security Environment
    Supreme Allied Commander, Transformation Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2490 United States of America ENCLOSURE 1 TO 3000 SC-6/Ser: NU0369 DATED 13 Jun 2007 FUTURE SECURITY ENVIRONMENT (FSE) First Edition FSE 2025 The Future Security Environment (FSE) is produced by the Intelligence Sub-Division, Headquarters, Supreme Allied Command Transformation (HQ SACT). If you would like to get in touch with the FSE team, contact: NATO HQ SACT, Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2490, United States of America. Tel +1 757 747 3537, fax +1 757 747 3914 E-mail mailto:[email protected] Alternatively you can visit the ACT website at: http://www.act.nato.int/ First Edition - Published March 2007. 2 1st Edition FSE 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 6 ALLIANCE – FROM COLD WAR TO COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH .......... 6 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 9 AIM ........................................................................................................................ 9 SCOPE .................................................................................................................. 9 SOURCES .......................................................................................................... 10 METHOD ............................................................................................................. 10 FUTURE SECURITY ENVIRONMENT – MAIN DRIVERS AND TRENDS ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Multilateral Approach Towards Education: the Case of the East African Community
    A multilateral approach towards education: the case of the East African Community -Master Final Thesis- Author: Giorgio Teresi Tutor: Miguel Angel Elizalde Carranza CEI INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Nº 6/2019, 23 DE OCTUBRE DE 2019 OCTUBRE DE 2019 COLECCIÓN TRABAJOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN DEL MÁSTER EN DIPLOMACIA Y FUNCIÓN PÚBLICA INTERNACIONAL Hand-in date: April 19th, 2018 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1. EDUCATION AND MULTILATERALISM: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ....... 3 1.1 Education as the basis of a society .................................................................................. 3 1.2 Multilateralism in the 21st century ................................................................................. 5 1.3 Conceptualising education after World War II: from an exclusively domestic affair to a transversal and multilateral issue ...................................................................................... 7 1.4 Education and UNESCO’s effectiveness in the last six decades.................................... 9 1.5 Education and multilateralism: a mutual relation ....................................................... 13 1.6 A brief insight into the regional implementation of multilateral education in the world: the influence o the European model across the world ........................................... 14 2. ANALYSIS OF THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY ................................................ 19 2.1 Regional integration
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Global Governance: the Role of Civil Society Organizations 2 Tom Fries, Peter Walkenhorst 3 with a Foreword by Jan Eliasson
    Tom Fries, Peter Walkenhorst With a foreword by Jan Eliasson Sharing Global Governance: The Role of Civil Society Organizations 2 Tom Fries, Peter Walkenhorst 3 With a foreword by Jan Eliasson Sharing Global Governance: The Role of Civil Society Organizations 4 Foreword The forces of globalization have changed the world fundamentally, and this change has accelerated in recent decades. As a result of these transformations, the world has become much more interconnected and interdependent. We work and feel increasingly like “a global village”. At the same time, the globalized world faces new challenges such as climate change, environmental degradation, poverty, pandemics and economic crises. These challenges respect no borders and cannot be solved by any country working alone. They require urgent and coordinated responses across the globe by a multiplicity of stakeholders. Yet, it is increasingly obvious that our current instruments of international problem-solving are insufficient to cope with these problems. We must ask how we can organize our political processes and institutions so that they can effectively and fairly deal with both local and global challenges. Clearly, the problems we face today are of such magnitude and complexity that they can be solved only by coordinated action. Therefore, we need more effective forms of collaboration between international organizations, governments, the private sector, the academic world and civil society. As UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon pointed out in his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2009: “Our times demand a new definition of leadership – global leadership. They demand a new constellation of international cooperation – governments, civil society and the private sector, working together for a collective global good.”1 “Our times demand a new definition of leadership – While this call for new forms of cooperation applies to all global global leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCAP Framework Agreement Cover-2-4.Indd
    FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON FACILITATION OF CROSS-BORDER PAPERLESS TRADE IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC The shaded areas of the map indicate ESCAP members and associate members.* The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacifi c (ESCAP) serves as the United Nations’ regional hub promoting cooperation among countries to achieve inclusive and sustainable development. The largest regional intergovernmental platform with 53 Member States and 9 Associate Members, ESCAP has emerged as a strong regional think-tank offering countries sound analytical products that shed insight into the evolving economic, social and environmental dynamics of the region. The Commission’s strategic focus is to deliver on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which it does by reinforcing and deepening regional cooperation and integration to advance connectivity, fi nancial cooperation and market integration. ESCAP’s research and analysis coupled with its policy advisory services, capacity building and technical assistance to governments aims to support countries’ sustainable and inclusive development ambitions. FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON FACILITATION OF CROSS-BORDER PAPERLESS TRADE IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON FACILITATION OF CROSS-BORDER PAPERLESS TRADE IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC United Nations Publications Trade and Investment Division ESCAP Bangkok, Thailand Copyright © United Nations 2019 All rights reserved Manufactured in Thailand For further information on this publication, please contact: Mia Mikic Director Trade and Investment Division United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific United Nations Building Rajadamnern Nok Avenue Bangkok 10200, Thailand Email: [email protected] This publication contains the full text of Framework Agreement on Facilitation of Cross- border Paperless Trade in Asia and the Pacific, adopted by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, on 19 May 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • World Youth Report
    WORLD YOUTH REPORT YOUTH AND THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WORLD YOUTH REPORT YOUTH AND THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WORLD YOUTH REPORT YOUTH AND THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT UNITED NATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS NEW YORK, 2018 World Youth Report Published by the United Nations New York, New York 10017 United States of America United Nations Publication Sales No.: E.18.IV.7 ISBN: 978-92-1-130349-0 eISBN: 978-92-1-363256-7 Copyright © United Nations, 2018 All rights reserved All queries or rights and licenses including subsidiary rights should be addressed to United Nations Publications, 405 E. 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, United States of America; email: [email protected]; website: un.org/publications. Note: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers. The term “country” as used in the text of the present report also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. The designations of country groups in the text and the tables are intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of the names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations. Technical Note: In this publication, unless otherwise indicated, the term “youth” refers to all those between the ages of 15 and 24, as reflected in the World Programme of Action for Youth.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in West Africa: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kerlly J
    International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 50 (2017) 629–639 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijantimicag Review Antimicrobial resistance in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis Kerlly J. Bernabé a, Céline Langendorf b, Nathan Ford c, Jean-Baptiste Ronat d, Richard A. Murphy e,* a Doctors Without Borders, New York, NY, USA b Epicentre, Paris, France c University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa d Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France e Division of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W. Carson Street, Box 466, Torrance, CA 90509, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Growing data suggest that antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections are common in low- and middle- Received 7 February 2017 income countries. This review summarises the microbiology of key bacterial syndromes encountered in Accepted 1 July 2017 West Africa and estimates the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) that could compromise first- line empirical treatment. We systematically searched for studies reporting on the epidemiology of bacterial Keywords: infection and prevalence of AMR in West Africa within key clinical syndromes. Within each syndrome, Antimicrobial agents the pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval were calculated for each pathogen–antibiotic pair using Drug resistance random-effects models. Among 281 full-text articles reviewed, 120 met the eligibility criteria. The ma- West Africa jority of studies originated from Nigeria (70; 58.3%), Ghana (15; 12.5%) and Senegal (15; 12.5%). Overall, 43 studies (35.8%) focused on urinary tract infections (UTI), 38 (31.7%) on bloodstream infections (BSI), 27 (22.5%) on meningitis, 7 (5.8%) on diarrhoea and 5 (4.2%) on pneumonia.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme the United Nations
    Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme The United Nations Geoscheme divides the world into regions and sub-regions. This assignment is for statistical convenience and does not imply any assumption regarding political or other affiliation of countries or territories. Table 1. United Nations Geoscheme (data from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/) Region Sub-region Countries and Territories Africa Northern Africa Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia, Western Sahara Eastern Africa British Indian Ocean Territory, Burundi, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, French Southern Territories, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mozambique, Réunion, Rwanda, Seychelles, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe Middle Africa Angola, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Sao Tome and Principe Southern Africa Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa Western Africa Benin, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Helena, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo Americas Latin America and the Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Bonaire, Sint Caribbean Eustatius and Saba, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Puerto Rico, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Martin (French Part),
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Annex
    STATISTICAL ANNEX CONTENTS PART 1: YOUTH-RELATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL INDICATORS .................. 137 PART 2: WORLD PROGRAMME OF ACTION FOR YOUTH INDICATORS ........................ 210 TABLES FOR PART 1: YOUTH-RELATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL INDICATORS .................. 137 GOAL 1 END POVERTY IN ALL ITS FORMS EVERYWHERE ����������������������������������� 138 Indicator 1.1.1 Proportion of population below the international poverty line, by sex, age, employment status and geographical location (urban/rural) ......................... 138 Indicator 1.2.1 Proportion of population living below the national poverty line, by sex and age ............. 140 Indicator 1.2.2 Proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions ......................................... 140 Indicator 1.3.1 Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, newborns, work-injury victims and the poor and the vulnerable ........... 141 Indicator 1.5.1 Number of deaths, missing persons and directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population ............................................... 144 Indicator 1.a.2 Proportion of total government spending on essential services (education, health and social protection) ��������������������������������������������������� 144 Indicator 1.b.1 Proportion of government recurrent and capital spending
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Faces of Justice: Legal Traditions, Legal Transplants, and Customary Justice in a Multicultural World
    THE THREE FACES OF JUSTICE: LEGAL TRADITIONS, LEGAL TRANSPLANTS, AND CUSTOMARY JUSTICE IN A MULTICULTURAL WORLD by JUAN CARLOS BOTERO A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.) at the Georgetown University Law Center 2013 i Copyright by Juan Carlos Botero 2013 ii Abstract This research explores the institutional and procedural architecture that enables or limits access to formal and informal dispute settlement mechanisms to resolve simple disputes among individuals in developing countries. The central argument is that the urban poor (including newly arrived migrant peasants and members of indigenous communities) in developing countries, are unable to keep their traditions and ancestral dispute settlement mechanisms alive in big cities, while they are also unable to understand and utilize what to them are abstruse legal procedures of the formal courts. A proposal is made at the end of the dissertation, which includes a novel conceptual framework to analyze the problem of deficient delivery of justice (formal and customary) to the urban poor, and a methodology to quantify the multiple dimensions of the same problem in low and middle-income countries throughout the world. The contribution of this work is: first, a new conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of formal and informal justice in developed and developing countries. Second, to expand knowledge on the uneasy interaction among legal traditions, legal transplants and customary justice in the multicultural world of the XXI century. Third, a descriptive analysis of a chronic problem which affects billions of people, i.e., the lack of effective access to justice (formal or customary) for the urban poor in low and middle-income countries.
    [Show full text]