Producing Results for People, Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Producing Results for People, Communities Great Lakes Restoration Projects: Producing Results for People, Communities The Great Lakes are one of the world’s greatest natural resources, an incomparable freshwater ecosystem that provides drinking water for than 30 million people and supports one of the world’s largest regional economies. Spanning 94,000 square miles, these inland seas are home to some of America’s best beaches, world-class fisheries, more than 30,000 islands and one of the world’s most popular tourist destinations: Niagara Falls. It is hard to believe that, decades after environmental protections were enacted, the Great Lakes remain threatened by toxic pollutants in harbors and tributaries that threaten the health of people and wildlife; invasive species that cost the region at least $200 million per year in damages and control costs; and habitat destruction that hurts water quality, wildlife, and the region’s outdoor recreation industry. Restoring the lakes may be a formidable task but it is a goal that is achievable. As this report demonstrates, communities across the Great Lakes region are working to heal the lakes. Through federal programs like the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, nonprofit organizations, government agencies, private businesses and property owners are working together to clean up toxic hot spots, restore fish and wildlife habitat and protect the Lakes from invasive species. The fruit of their labor is becoming more evident by the day. Restoration projects have: Brought back the native Atlantic salmon fishery in Lake Ontario; restored wetlands in Buffalo; improved Lake Huron’s fishery by removing dams in rivers that flow into the lake; dredged 250,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment from the Ottawa River in Ohio; and cleaned up part of the Grand Calumet River in Indiana — one of America’s most polluted rivers. These are just a few examples of Great Lakes restoration projects that are improving water quality, eliminating toxic hazards and improving fisheries. Restoration projects also create jobs and pump new revenue into communities. Several restoration projects in the Detroit area are featured in this report, for two reasons: Detroit is home to some of the region’s most successful Great Lakes restoration projects; and the Motor City was the site of the 2011 Healing Our Waters – Great Lakes Coalition’s Great Lakes Restoration Conference. Detroit is a leader in Great Lakes restoration, and the city’s efforts are paying huge dividends for the environment and the city’s struggling economy. The bottom line is that Great Lakes restoration projects deliver results and offer some of the best returns on the dollar in the federal budget. The successful restoration projects contained in this report can be replicated in communities throughout the Great Lakes states of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin—if the federal government continues to support solutions to these urgent problems by funding important programs like the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. Now is not the time to scale back our nation’s commitment to the Great Lakes, because there is still much work that needs to be done to clean up contamination, stop sewage overflows, and restore wetlands that keep polluted runoff from farms and cities out of the lakes. If restoration efforts stall, the problems will get worse and more costly to fix. This report highlights solutions to restore the Great Lakes, protect drinking water, safeguard public health, create jobs and improve the quality of life for millions of people. It’s time for federal public officials to act to protect this iconic resource now and for generations to come. More than 120 organizations representing millions of people are uniting to restore one of America’s greatest natural wonders — the Great Lakes. The coalition seeks to stop sewage contamination, shut the door on invasive species, and restore wetlands and other damaged habitat, each of which is an essential component of restoring the health of the Great Lakes. For more information, contact: JEFF SKELDING CHAD LORD JENNIFER HILL JORDAN LUBETKIN Campaign Director Policy Director Field Director Communications Director 202-797-6893 202-454-3385 734-887-7104 734-887-7109 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Healing Our Waters®-Great Lakes Coalition • c/o National Wildlife Federation • 213 W. Liberty Street, Suite 200, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Written by Jeff Alexander • DesignedTuan by Do Removing dams boosts brook trout population DEscRIPTION The Flowing Well Trout Farm, built in the mid-1900s, erected 12 small dams to Flowing create fish rearing ponds. The dams, built on the North branch of the Manistee River and the Flowing Well Creek, diverted the natural flow of a trout stream, Well Trout caused unnaturally high water temperatures, blocked fish passage and Farm disrupted the natural movement of sediment and woody debris in the river. APPROXIMATE COST OF PROJECT Restoration $626,000. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative funds helped support this project. Project RESOURCE CHALLENGES ADDREssED KALKASKA, MICHIGAN Fish passage, excessive warming of water temperatures, fragmentation of a river ecosystem, the loss of wetlands and the loss of fish spawning habitat. KEY PARTNERS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE) The Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Lake Restoration Initiative, Elliott Donnelly Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Paul Young Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Sustain Our Great Lakes grant (administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation), U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Conservation Resource Alliance’s River Care program. The north branch of the Manistee River before the dams were removed. (Photo courtesy of Conservation Resource Alliance) PROJECT SUMMARY Removing several dams from a defunct fish farm in northern Michigan restored natural conditions in 37 miles of a trout After the dams were removed. (Photo courtesy of Conservation Resource Alliance) stream, which increased the native brook trout population. TYPES OF JOBS CREATED Biologists, ecologists, environmental engineers, civil engineers, truck drivers, excavators, project monitors and administrative support personnel. RESULTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS The project restored natural conditions in 37 miles of a trout stream, increased the native brook trout population, lowered water temperatures, eliminated sediment buildup, removed the risk of dams failing and restored 100 acres of wetlands. WEB SITE www.rivercare.org Great LAkeS restoration Projects: Producing reSults for People, CommunitieS 1 Written by Jeff Alexander • DesignedTuan by Do Reducing erosion improves a New York trout stream DEscRIPTION Brook trout historically lived in rivers and streams across New York, but their Clear Creek distribution and abundance were severely reduced by competition from other species, the loss of fish habitat, and the fragmentation of rivers. In Clear Creek, Habitat excess stream channel erosion and sediment inputs, in-stream barriers, elevated water temperatures and competition from non-native fish species restricted Restoration brook trout to a few tributaries in the watershed. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other organizations used a combination of approaches to restore Project 1,200 linear feet of in-stream habitat and re-establish fish passage over a FREEDOM, NEW YORK sheet-pile grade control structure, which reconnected six miles of trout habitat in Clear Creek. APPROXIMATE COST OF PROJECT $106,211. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative funds helped support this project. RESOURCE CHALLENGES ADDREssED Stream bank erosion and sedimentation, the loss of in- stream habitat and deep pools that trout favor. KEY PARTNERS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE) Excess stream bank erosion and sediment U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, New deposition before the restoration project. York Department of Environmental (Photo courtesy of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Trout Unlimited – Service) Western New York Chapter, Trout Unlimited – Red House Brook PROJECT SUMMARY Chapter, Seneca Trail Resource Stabilizing eroding stream Conservation and Development banks and improving fish Council and the Great Lakes passage in New York’s Clear Restoration Initiative. Creek could improve the trout stream by reducing the amount of sediment washing into the Improved natural stability of the stream channel TYPES OF JOBS CREATED waterway. The project is part after the restoration. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ecologists, biologists, excavators of a growing effort to help Service photo) and truck drivers. New York reclaim its heritage as a state teeming with healthy RESULTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS trout streams. The project begins to restore prime habitat in a section of stream where trout were once abundant by restoring natural stream function. The New York Department of Environmental Conservation maintains 5.5 miles of easement along Clear Creek, along the project site, to support recreational fishing. An additional 1,200 linear feet of habitat will be restored immediately downstream of the completed project during summer 2012. WEB SITE http //1.usa.gov/zelDR8 2 Great LAkeS restoration Projects: Producing reSults for People, CommunitieS Nature returns to an urban creek in Cleveland DEscRIPTION A group of government agencies and private engineering firms developed a Big Creek plan to restore nearly one mile of Big Creek, which was disfigured by decades of urban development. Intense development increased the volume of polluted Watershed
Recommended publications
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-18054, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333-15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Parts 26, 32, 36, and 71 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000] RIN 1018-BD79 2019–2020 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open seven National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) that are currently closed to hunting and sport fishing. In addition, we expand hunting and sport fishing at 70 other NWRs, and add pertinent station-specific regulations for other NWRs that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing for the 2019–2020 season. We also formally open 15 units of the National Fish Hatchery System to hunting and sport fishing. We also add pertinent station- specific regulations that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing at these 15 National Fish Hatcheries (NFHs) for the 2019–2020 season. This rule includes global administrative updates to every NWR entry in our refuge- specific regulations and the reorganization of general public use regulations. We remove approximately 2,100 regulations that will have no impact on the administration of hunting and sport fishing within the National Wildlife Refuge System. We also simplify over 2,900 refuge- specific regulations to comply with a Presidential mandate to adhere to plain language standards 1 and to reduce the regulatory burden on the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield Into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’S Only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance
    OPEN ACCESS www. wsforum.org Article Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’s only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance John Hartig 1,* and Allison Krueger 2 E-Mails: [email protected]; [email protected] *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-734-692-7608; Fax: +1-734-692-7603 Received: / Accepted: / Published: Abstract: The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge spans 77 km along the Detroit River and western Lake Erie, and is the only international wildlife refuge in North America. A key unit of the refuge is the 166-ha Humbug Marsh that represents the last kilometer of natural shoreline on the U.S. mainland of the river and Michigan’s only “Wetland of International Importance” designated under the 1971 International Ramsar Convention. Adjacent to Humbug Marsh is an 18-ha former industrial manufacturing site (now called the Refuge Gateway) that is being remediated and restored as an ecological buffer for Humbug Marsh and the future home of the refuge’s visitor center. Restoration and redevelopment activities have included: cleanup and capping of contaminated lands; daylighting a creek and constructing a retention pond and emergent wetland to treat storm water prior to discharge to the Detroit River; restoring coastal wetland, riparian buffer, and upland habitats; and constructing two roads, hiking/biking trails, and a kayak/canoe landing to offer wildlife-compatible public uses that allow visitors to experience this internationally- recognized natural resource. This project has been described as transformational for the region by restoring an industrial brownfield into high quality wildlife habitat that expands the ecological buffer of a Ramsar site.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item XI Ramsar COP11 DOC. 8 Report of the Secretary General
    11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) “Wetlands: home and destination” Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Agenda item XI Ramsar COP11 DOC. 8 Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 concerning the List of Wetlands of International Importance Explanatory note: This paper provides information received at the Secretariat up to 2 June 2012 which is required to be presented to COP11 under the terms of Article 8.2 of the Convention. The information provided below should be updated by Contracting Parties, if necessary, just before or during COP11 through written texts submitted to the Secretariat, and as appropriate these will then be incorporated into a revised COP11 DR 4 on “The status of sites in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance” to be considered during COP11. Parties are requested not to repeat orally during the plenary session their written updates that have been provided to the Secretariat, “in order to save time spent on corrections and comments during plenary sessions” (Decision SC42-7). See also COP11 DOC. 3 Add.1 for further information about interventions during COP11 plenaries. 1. Article 8.2 of the text of the Convention on Wetlands states that the continuing duties of the Secretariat shall be, inter alia, “b) to maintain the List of Wetlands of International Importance and to be informed by the Contracting Parties of any additions, extensions, deletions or restrictions concerning wetlands included in the List provided in accordance
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2011/WINTER 2012 from the Public Have Been Addressed and the Plan Is Undergoing Final Revisions Needed
    HUNT PLAN UPDATE Steve Dushane, Assistant Refuge Manager The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge hunting plan and environmental The WildSide assessment was made available for public A newsletter for the supporters of the International Wildlife Refuge Alliance and the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge comment in 2011. Many of the comments FALL 2011/WINTER 2012 from the public have been addressed and the plan is undergoing final revisions needed. The next step will be to work on the exact language to be placed in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). It is our hope that the hunting plan will be published in the CFR in early 2012 and that hunting on the refuge will be approved by fall 2012. The Refuge is very excited and looking forward to offering hunting as an approved public use in the near future. Photo: Jerry Jourdan International Wildlife Refuge Alliance US Postage 9311 Groh Road PAID Grosse Ile, Michigan 48138 Nonprofit Organization iwralliance.org Permit #153 Wyandotte, MI In this issue: • Upcoming Events! • State of the Strait! • Big Changes at the Refuge Gateway! ...and more! Photo: Jerry Jourdan Message from the Alliance Chair: About The topics ofUrban Refuges and Landscape DRIWR Conservation Cooperatives came up at the FWS Visioning Conference, “Conserving the Future”: Wildlife & IWRA Refuges and the Next Generation held in Madison, WI The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge (DRIWR) is this past July. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director, Upcoming Events located along the lower Detroit River and western shoreline Updated program information can be found at www.iwralliance.org or www.fws.gov/midwest/detroitriver of Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance
    The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Ramsar Convention What Ramsar Is: Who can nominate a site stakeholders associated with the proposed site greatly contribute to • In 1971, an international convention • Any local government, group, the nomination process; and was held in Ramsar, Iran and community, private organization, participants signed a treaty entitled, or landowner can nominate a A completed Ramsar Information “The Convention on Wetlands of site for inclusion on the Ramsar Sheet, is available online at http://bit. International Importance, Especially List of Wetlands of International ly/1HIU7PR as Waterfowl Habitat.” Importance. The Federal government can also nominate sites, such as Nine Criteria for “Wetlands • The Ramsar Convention provides a National Parks, National Forests, or of International Importance” framework for voluntary international National Wildlife Refuges. Designation: cooperation for wetland conservation. A wetland should be considered • A written agreement is required internationally important if it meets • The U.S. acceded to the Ramsar from all landowners and a Member Convention April 18, 1987. any one of the following criteria. The of Congress representing the site: geographic area. What Ramsar Does: 1. contains a representative, rare, • Recognizes wetlands’ importance to Nomination package or unique example of a natural communities, cultures, governments, The petitioner must submit a complete or near-natural wetland type and businesses and encourages nomination package to the Director, found within the appropriate wetland conservation and wise use of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), biogeographic region; or wetlands. 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006, with a copy to the Global 2. supports vulnerable, endangered, • Establishes criteria for designating Program, Division of International or critically endangered species rivers, marshes, coral reefs and other Conservation, FWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System Steven Francoeur Eastern Michigan University
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor State of the Strait Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research 2016 State of the Strait: Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System Steven Francoeur Eastern Michigan University Jan Ciborowski University of Windsor John Gannon USGS Great Lakes Science Center Donna Kashian Wayne State University Katherine Kahl The Nature Conservancy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/softs Recommended Citation Francoeur, Steven; Ciborowski, Jan; Gannon, John; Kashian, Donna; and Kahl, Katherine. (2016). State of the Strait: Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/softs/6 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in State of the Strait by an authorized administrator of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System 2016 Cover Photo Credits: Jerry Jourdan (Spiderweb at the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge - Humbug Unit, August 2015), Mike Grosso (Seagull and ship passing by Belanger Park - River Rouge, Michigan, November 2015), US Fish and Wildlife Service (Sunrise and Humbug Marsh - Detroit River, June 2015), Michigan Sea Grant (Sturgeon, December 2001). State of the Strait: Coordinating Conservation in the St. Clair-Detroit River System 2016 Edited by: Steven Francoeur, Eastern Michigan University; Jan Ciborowski, University of Windsor; John Gannon, USGS Great Lakes Science Center (ret.); Donna Kashian, Wayne State University; and Katherine Kahl, The Nature Conservancy Based on the 2015 State of the Strait Conference held at Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA Suggested citation: Francoeur, S., J.
    [Show full text]
  • GLAH Fall 05
    Fall Edition 2005 Volume 13 Issue 4 Don’t Miss this Opportunity to Have In This Issue: Your Voice Heard on Great Lakes Issues! Director’s Notes . 2 A Higher Quality of Life (Grassroots Profile) . 3 Grassroots Citizen Advocate Award Recipients . 4, 5 The Future of the Great Lakes Can’t Attend? Protecting Rare Habitat Water Quality Agreement Contribute online (Partnership Profile) . 6 First signed in 1972, the Great Lakes Water www.ijc.org/glconsultations Industrial Pollution Laws Quality Agreement between Canada and the Call toll-free (866) 813-0642 (Lake Ontario) . 7 United States expresses the commitment of Fax (613) 993-5583 Bulldozer Amendment each country to restore and maintain the Write International Joint Commission (Lake Erie - U.S.) . 8 chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Great Lakes basin ecosystem. Great Lakes Regional Office Fish Barrier Project 100 Ouellette Ave., 8th Floor or (Lake Erie – Ontario) . 9 The governments of the United States and P.O. Box 32869 Public Trust Doctrine Canada are required to review the operation Windsor, ON N9A 6T3 (Lake Huron - U.S.) . 10 and effectiveness of the Agreement every six Detroit, MI 48232 years and determine whether it needs to be Fen Habitat The governments will receive your (Lake Huron – Ontario) . 11 amended in any way. It is now time for the governments to launch that review. submission in full, in the format in which it Aquatic Invaders was submitted (audio-visual or written). (Lake Michigan) . 12 The governments have asked the A New Sense of Community International Joint Commission to consult Deadline for submissions: (Lake Superior) .
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar COP11 DOC. 12 Regional Overview of the Implementation Of
    11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) “Wetlands: home and destination” Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Ramsar COP11 DOC. 12 English and Spanish only Regional overview of the implementation of the Convention and its Strategic Plan in the Americas (Neotropics & North American regions) National Reports upon which this overview is based can be consulted at http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-natl-rpts-national-reports- 2012/main/ramsar/1-31-121%5E25327_4000_0__. 1. Contracting Parties in the Americas as of March 31, 2012: Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Chile, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Lucia, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, United States of America, Uruguay, and Venezuela (29). Ramsar COP11 DOC. 12, page 2 2. Contracting Parties whose National Reports are included in this analysis: Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Barbados, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Saint Lucia, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, United States of America, Uruguay, and Venezuela (25). 3. Contracting Parties that have not yet submitted their National Reports: Bahamas, Belize and Peru (3). In the case of Nicaragua, the report was incomplete and not in the current reporting format. 4. There are 35 countries in the Americas, of which 29 are already Contracting Parties. Since COP10 Grenada has submitted the formalities for accession to UNESCO and should become the 30th Party in the Americas once the Convention enters into force for that country.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the Shiawassee Flats
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NATURAL RESOURCES & ENVIRONMENT Restoring the Shiawassee Flats Estuarine Gateway to Saginaw Bay Prepared by: Janet Buchanan, Seta Chorbajian, Andrea Dominguez, Brandon Hartleben, Brianna Knoppow, Joshua Miller, Caitlin Schulze, Cecilia Seiter with historical land use analyses by Yohan Chang A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at the University of Michigan April 2013 Client: Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge Faculty advisors: Dr. Michael J. Wiley, Dr. Sara Adlerstein-Gonzalez, Dr. Kurt Kowalski (USGS-GLSC) Preface In 2011, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Ducks Unlimited received a $1.5 million Sustain Our Great Lakes grant for the first phase of a wetland restoration project at the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, outside Saginaw, Michigan. The ambitious project seeks to hydrologically reconnect a 2,260-acre complex of bottomland farm fields and diked wetlands to the dynamic river systems surrounding the Refuge. The goals of this restoration are to provide fish, birds, and insects with access to a large, restored wetland complex both through hydrologic reconnection and wetland restoration; and to contribute to the delisting of at least three of the Beneficial Use Impairments in the Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern, just downstream of the Refuge. Phase I of the restoration project involves the conversion of 940 acres of former farmland, now owned by the Refuge, to ecologically productive wetland, and its hydrologic reconnection to the Shiawassee and Flint Rivers. The grant for Phase I included enough funds to complete the design, engineering, and implementation of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge “I Love Nature Because There Is So Much to Do
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge “I love nature because there is so much to do. For instance, you can cloud watch or bird watch. ” 6th grade student from Bunche Academy, Detroit Public Schools Community District. Above, fox squirrel. / Mike Grosso, USFWS Volunteer Right, common tern / Jerry Jourdan, USFWS Volunteer. Middle, Students. / USFWS Bottom, monarch butterfly / Nancy Gilliand, USFWS Volunteer. Enjoy Nature where you are! Tandem / USFWS Welcome to “Save Humbug Marsh!” your Refuge That was the message developers received from 1,000 rain-soaked citizens who converged in a high school in the down river community of Gibraltar, Michigan in September, House wren. Jerry Jourdan / USFWS 1998. The citizens gathered Volunteer to oppose a development that would have destroyed the last remaining mile of natural shoreline on the U.S. side of the Detroit River. It would fill Humbug Marsh and convert more than 400 acres of coastal wetlands, oak-hickory forest, and vernal pools into condominiums, businesses, a Local citizens after golf course, and a marina. successfully protecting Humbug Marsh. / USFWS The citizens saved the marsh. This success story stands as a shining example of how a group of concerned citizens has the power to make positive changes in their community. The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge is the only international wildlife refuge School students discuss in North America. The different ways they connect Humbug Marsh unit is only to nature. / USFWS one of the many areas that make up the refuge. The refuge includes islands, coastal wetlands, marshes, shoals, and waterfront lands along 48 miles of Detroit River and Western Lake Erie shorelines.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2004 Annual Lands Report
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Annual Report of Lands Under Control of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service as of September 30, 2004 On the cover: compatible, mutually-shared focus on fish Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge and wildlife habitat protection, conservation, and rehabilitation. Established by Public Law 107-91 on December 21, 2001, the Detroit River On September 15, 2004, the Service International Wildlife Refuge (IWR) is acquired Humbug Marsh, the last the first international refuge in North remaining natural wetland on the America. Detroit River IWR is located American banks of the Detroit River, along the lower Detroit River and from Trust for Public Land. Humbug western shoreline of Lake Erie. The Marsh consists of 409.5 undeveloped authorized Refuge boundary includes acres, located in the City of Gibraltar and islands, coastal wetlands, marshes, shoals the City of Trenton, Wayne County, and riverfront lands along the Lower Michigan that includes an island, a marsh Detroit River in Michigan and Canada. and uplands. The area is well known to Recently, Detroit River was designated many anglers and hunters. It is a place both as an American Heritage River and where migrating ducks feast on half- a Canadian Heritage River. submerged beds of wild celery and sturgeon are beginning to spawn again in This refuge fosters health and diversity of the slow-moving, shallow waters. Along wildlife, fish, and plant resources through the 32-mile shoreline between the city of protection, creation of new habitats, Detroit and Lake Erie, this is the only management, and restoration of natural natural wetland and one of only a few, communities.
    [Show full text]
  • USA Humbug Marsh RIS E Nov 2010
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) 2009-2012 version 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . DD MM YY Tracy Collin, Department of Environmental Quality Land and Water Management Division Constitution Hall – 1 st Floor P.O. Box 30458 Designation date Site Reference Number Lansing, MI 48909-7958, USA Phone: 517-241-4506 Fax: 517-373-6917 Email: [email protected] John Hartig, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge Large Lakes Research Station 9311 Groh Road Grosse Ile, MI 48138, USA Phone: 734-692-7608 Fax: 734-692-7603 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: April 2009 3. Country: USA 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Humbug Marsh 5. Designation of new Ramsar site or update of existing site: This RIS is for (tick one box only) : a) Designation of a new Ramsar site X; or b) Updated information on an existing Ramsar site 6. For RIS updates only. N/A 7. Map of site: a) A map of the site, with clearly delineated boundaries, is included as: i) a hard copy (required for inclusion of site in the Ramsar List): X ii ) an electronic format (e.g. a JPEG or ArcView image) X; iii) a GIS file providing geo-referenced site boundary vectors and attribute tables X. b) Describe briefly the type of boundary delineation applied: The boundary follows the existing protection boundary of the Humbug Marsh portion of the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge. Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 2 8.
    [Show full text]