Decisions of the RTA Meeting Held on 07/02/2013 1] Heard; This Is An

Decisions of the RTA meeting held on 07/02/2013 1] Heard; This is an application for the grant of regular permit in respect of stage carriage KL 15 6393 on the route Poothamkutty - Angamaly - Thripunithura by the STU. Regular permit granted with the proposed time. 2] Heard; This is an application for the grant of regular permit in respect of stage carriage KL 15 6380 on the route Poothamkutty - Angamaly - Thripunithura by the STU. Regular permit granted with the proposed time. 3] [a] Perused the Judgement of the Hon'ble STAT in MVAA No:108/2010 [b] Heard & reconsidered; Learned counsel Adv Deepak appeared for the applicant. This is an application for the grant of regular permit on the route Vattaparambu – Kanakkankadavu via Puliyanam, Elavoor Kavala, Angamaly, Maikad, Athani, Changamanad, and Kurumassery in the vacant timings of S/C KL 7/AN 1431 The RTA held on 21/06/2008 vide item no 1 has considered the regular permit application and adjourned for giving opportunity to the applicant to modify the application by avoiding overlap on notified route and by providing vehicle with a wheel base less than 510 cm. The RTA held on 12/06/2009 vide item No 21 again considered the matter and adjourned in the light of judgment of honble STAT in MVAA No 199/2009 dated 06/05/2009. Now the applicant produced the order of the Hon’ble STAT in MVAA No: 108/2010. In this order the tribunal observed that the application for permit was made on 21/08/2007. The objectionable scheme came into force only on 14/07/2009. The delay in granting the permit was not attributed any lack on the part of the appellant. Hence in compliance to the Judgment of the Hon'ble STAT in MVAA No:108/2010, regular permit granted subject to settlement of time. 4] Heard; The applicant appeared. This is an application for the grant of fresh regular permit in respect of stage carriage KL 39 E 4568 owned by the applicant on the route Piravam- Edakkattuvayal- Arayankavu Via Kanjiramattom, Amballoor, Chethikode, Vattapara, Kottapuram, Peppathy, Arakunnam, Mulamthuruthy (Circular) Parathakode. There is no overlapping on notified route reported. Hence regular permit granted subject to settlement of time. 5] [a] Perused the Judgement of the Hon'ble STAT in MVAA No:192/2012 [b] Heard & reconsidered; Learned counsel Adv Deepak appeared for the applicant. This is an application for the grant of regular permit (suitable vehicle seating capacity not less than 28 in all) on the route South Vazhakulam – Aluva- Kalady via Choondy, Marampilly, Thiruvairanikulam and Kanjoor. The RTA held on 07/05/2011 vide item number 18 heard the matter and rejected, since the proposed route overlaps 2.5 km on the notified route which exceeds the permissible limit. This violates GO (P) No 42/Trans/2009 dated 14/07/2009. Now the honourable STAT Ernakulam allowed the revision petitions in MVARP No 192/2012. The impugned order set aside and ordered to the 1st respondent (RTA Ernakulam) to grant regular permit to the petitioner and 2nd respondent (secretary RTA Ernakulam) shall settle timings in accordance with the provisions of the Act and rules and after hearing all the interested parties within a period of two months. Hence in compliance to the Judgment of the Hon'ble STAT in MVAA No:256/2012, regular permit granted subject to settlement of time. 6] [a] Perused the Judgement of the Hon'ble STAT in MVAA No:191/2012 [b] Heard & reconsidered; Learned counsel Adv Deepak appeared for the applicant. This is an application for the grant of regular permit (suitable vehicle seating capacity not less than 28 in all) on the Aluva- Kalady via Choondy, GTN, Vazhakulam South, Manampilly , Thiruvairanikulam, Kanjoor. The RTA held on 07/05/2011 heard the matter and rejected, since the proposed route overlaps 2.5 km on the notified route which exceeds the permissible limit. This violates GO (P) No 42/Trans/2009 dated 14/07/2009. Now the honourable STAT Ernakulam allowed the revision petitions in MVARP No 191/2012. The impugned order set aside and ordered to the 1st respondent (RTA Ernakulam) to grant regular permit to the petitioner and 2nd respondent (secretary RTA Ernakulam) shall settle timings in accordance with the provisions of the Act and rules and after hearing all the interested parties within a period of two months. Hence in compliance to the Judgment of the Hon'ble STAT in MVAA No:191/2012, regular permit granted subject to settlement of time. [7] Heard; Learned counsel Adv Deepak appeared for the applicant. This is an application for the grant of regular permit in respect of stage carriage (suitable vehicle with seating capacity not less than 28 in all) on the route Ernakulam High Court- Chully Via Kalamukku, Cherai Jn, vedimara, Chengamanad, Athani Jn, maikkad church jn, Mekad, Telk Jn, Angamaly KSRTC Jn, Thuravoor, Chandrapura. Report furnished related with overlapping of nationalised route is not specific. Secretary is directed to report the overlapping in nationalisation and details of notification specific. Hence, Adjourned. [8] Heard; This is the request of Secretary RTA Malappuram for the renewal of permit concurrence in respect of KL 10 AE 5140 on the route Ernakulam – Kozhikodu as LSOL. Ernakulam South to Edappally 8 kms lies in the scheme TVM –Palakkad and TVM- Cannoor. Thekkenaluvazhi to North parur 1.5 km lies in Aluva- Chathanad Scheme North Parur – Moothakunnam bridge 6kms lies in Aluva – kuriapilly Scheme. But this is a permit renewal concurrence. Hence granted subject to Notification No:42/2009 dated 14/07/2009, draft Notification No:5631/B2/2009/Trans dated 02/08/2012 and WP[C] No:20520/2009, 22196/2009. 9] [a] Perused the Judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in WP (C) No 11323 of 2012. (b) Heard; The portion from Palarivattom to Edappally sig jn [9km] and Paravoor to Moothakunnam (6.5 km) overlaps on the notified route Trivandrum – Palakkad, Trivandrum – Cannur , Aluva- Kuriapilly and Aluva- Chathanad schemes. But this is a permit renewal concurrence. Hence granted in the light of judgement of honourable High Court of Kerala subject to Notification No:42/2009 dated 14/07/2009, draft Notification No:5631/B2/2009/Trans dated 02/08/2012 and WP[C] No:20520/2009, 22196/2009. 10] Heard; The portion from Palarivattom to Ernakulam South [6.5km] overlaps on notified route in Ernakulam- Thrissur, TVM- Palakkad and TVM- Kannur scheme. But this is a permit renewal concurrence. Hence granted subject to Notification No:42/2009 dated 14/07/2009, draft Notification No:5631/B2/2009/Trans dated 02/08/2012 and WP[C] No:20520/2009, 22196/2009. 11] Heard; Learned counsel appeared for the applicant. The portion from Palarivattom to Ernakulam South [6.5km] overlaps on notified route in Ernakulam- Thrissur, TVM- Palakkad and TVM- Kannur scheme. But this is a permit renewal concurrence. Hence granted subject to Notification No:42/2009 dated 14/07/2009, draft Notification No:5631/B2/2009/Trans dated 02/08/2012 and WP[C] No:20520/2009, 22196/2009. 12] Heard; The portion from Palarivattom to Ernakulam South [6.5km] overlaps on notified route in Ernakulam- Thrissur, TVM- Palakkad and TVM- Kannur scheme. But this is a permit renewal concurrence. Hence granted subject to Notification No:42/2009 dated 14/07/2009, draft Notification No:5631/B2/2009/Trans dated 02/08/2012 and WP[C] No:20520/2009, 22196/2009. 13] [a] Perused the Judgement of the Hon'ble STAT in MVARP No 433/2012 and 437/2012. (b) Heard; The portion from Moothakunnam to Neerpara [67km] lies in Ernakulam district. The route portion from Moothakunnam to N Parur [5km] Parur to Thekkenaluvazhy [1.5 km] Edappally to Puthenkavu [31km] overlaps on Aluva – Kuriappally, Aluva – Chathanad, Trivandrum – Kannur & Ernakulam - Thekkady schemes respectively. But this is a permit renewal concurrence. Hence granted in the light of judgement of honourable STAT subject to Notification No:42/2009 dated 14/07/2009, draft Notification No:5631/B2/2009/Trans dated 02/08/2012 and WP[C] No:20520/2009, 22196/2009. 14] Heard; Learned counsel appeared for the applicant. As per the Judgement of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in W A No:444/2007 in WP[C] No: 32571/2006, directed Secretary RTA to issue permit to the vehicle if there is need. Hence reissue of TP granted for 4 months the route Poothotta- Aluva U/S 87 (1) (C). 15] Heard; Learned counsel Adv Stalin Peter Davis appeared for the applicant. The T P is issued continuously by RTA U/S 104 of MV Act for stage carriage KL 07 BB 9809 from long back years. Eventhough KSRTC has filed objection, they have not applied or obtained permit on this route. Considering the convenience and facility of travelling public, reissue of T P granted on the route Kalluchira- Eloor Depot in the vacant timings of S/C KL 07 K 4753 U/S 104 for 4 months or till KSRTC apply and obtain permit on the route whichever is earlier. 16] Heard; Learned counsel Adv Deepak appeared for the applicant. The T P is issued continuously by RTA U/S 104 of MV Act for stage carriage KL 17/D 9417 from long back years. Eventhough KSRTC has filed objection, they have not applied or obtained permit on this route. Considering the convenience and facility of travelling public, reissue of T P granted on the route Pallissery- Perumbavoor in the vacant timings of S/C KL 08 K 7025 for 4 months or till KSRTC apply and obtain permit on the route whichever is earlier.

Load more