DOCSLIB.ORG

Marius Jost Anbieterliste Videokonferenz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marius Jost Anbieterliste Videokonferenz QUELLE: Marius Jost Anbieterliste Videokonferenz- & Webinarplattformen mit Hosting in der EU Stand: 03.07.2020, Irrtümber sind an jeder Stelle der Tabelle möglich. Die Übersicht stellt keine Empfehlung dar. Installation von Software beim Teilnehmer nötig? Softwareba Break- siert (S) / Produktna Unternehme Out- Browserbas Hosting in der EU me nssitz Rooms iert (B) oder Deutschland Adobe Inc. San José, AdobeConnec Kalifornien, S (in Zukunft EU: Ja Deutschland: t USA Ja auch B) Ja BigBlueButton EU: Ja Deutschland: Inc. Ja bigBlueButto Ontario, Open-Source n Canada Ja B Software: LGPL Verizon Communicatio ns Inc. BlueJeans New York Meetings City, USA Ja S EU: Ja Clickmeeting (Eher für Online- ClickMeeting Marketing Sp. z o.o. geeignet) Polen Nein B EU: Ja edudip GmbH Edudip next Deutschland Nein B Deutschland: Ja FastViewer FastViewer Instant GmbH Meeting Deutschland Nein S und B Deutschland: Ja LogMeIn Ireland Limited Zentrale: Sofern Standort von Boston, Nein (nur Host und Teilnehmer Massachusetts, GoToTrain in Europa: Hosting in GoToMeeting USA ing) S und B der EU. Metyoo meetyoo Business conferencing Meeting GmbH Zweitmarke: Berlin, Meetgreen Deutschland angefragt B EU: Ja MVC Mobile Video MVC Communicatio Personal- n Meeting- Kronberg Ts., Room Deutschland Nein S Deutschland: Ja Wiederverkäufer und Service Partner und IT Support Partner für große Unternehmen. Vertrieben wird unter anderem die aufgekaufte Lösung Arkadin Anywhere, NTT Docomo Cisco WebEx und inzwischen auch BlueJeans von (ehemals Verizon. AdobeConnect ist derzeit noch auf der Arkadin NTT Docomo Webseite gelistet, seit Ende 2019 verkauft NTT Deutschland) Inc. Docomo in Deutschland das System nicht mehr aktiv. maloon GmbH Ingolstadt, socialhub.io Deutschland Ja B Deutschland: Ja STRUKTUR AG Stuttgart, Derzeit B (S ist Spreed Deutschland geplant geplant) Deutschland: Ja Microsoft Inc. Redmond, Emulierbar Washington, in TEAMS USA Channels S und B Deutschland: Ja TeamViewer AG TeamViewer Göppingen, Blizz Deutschland Nein B Deutschland: Ja Telekom Deutsche Conferencing Telekom AG & Bonn, Wiederverkäufer für Cisco und Microsoft. Hosting in Collaboration Deutschland der EU z. B. für Cisco Produkte möglich. Cisco Systems, Inc. San José, WebEx Kalifornien, Meetings USA Nein S oder B EU: Ja Schweiz oder Hosting auf eigenem Server; Offener Quellcode „Im Gegensatz zu Wettbewerbern, wie Microsoft Teams oder Slack, besitzt Wire Wire Pro nicht die Schlüssel, (Fokus auf um die Verschlüsselu Wire Swiss Unternehmenskommu ng & GmbH nikation zu Sicherheit) Zug, Schweiz Nein S entschlüsseln.“ netucate systems GmbH Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, YuLinc Deutschland Ja B Deutschland: Ja ZOOM Video Communicatio Nein (grds. Zoom ns Inc. Cloud) Derzeit San José, nur Auswahl von Data ZOOM Kalifornien, S (B Center Meetings USA Ja möglich) Regions möglich. Jitsi (Gemeinschaftsprojekt), Loopup (Loopup Ltd.), Matrix (New Vector Ltd.), Next Cloud Talk (Nextcloud GmbH), Rocket.Chat Weitere (RocketChat), Swyx (Swyx Solutions GmbH), Tixeo (Tixeo GmbH), Anbieter Univado (the new economy group GmbH) RED connect Hosting in Videosprechst RED Medical Deutschland ohne unde Systems GmbH Nein B Aufpreis Nicht notwendig, da alles in einem virtuellen Raum abbildbar ist (Teil des Konzeptes – separates trember GmbH, arbeiten in Berlin, einem trember Deutschland Raum) Nein EU alfaview Video alfaview gmbh, Conferencing Karlsruhe, Deutschland: Ja; bei Systems Deutschland Ja S Bedarf auch in der EU Produkte unter “Weitere Anbieter” wurden später recherchiert. Sie sollen nicht als weniger wichtig erscheinen als ausführlicher beschriebenen Angebote. Die Reihenfolge der Liste hat keinerlei Bedeutung. Dieser Artikel wurde von keinem Hersteller bezahlt oder initiiert. Für die jeweiligen Marken liegen alle Rechte beim jeweiligen Inhaber. Hersteller und Organisationen, die sich falsch repräsentiert fühlen, wenden sich bitte an info at Marius – Jost . de .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schluss Mit Facebook: Fünf Whatsapp-Alternativen Im Überblick
    https://futurezone.at/apps/schluss-mit-facebook-fuenf-whatsapp-alternativen-im-ueberblick/400529764 Apps 23.06.2019 Schluss mit Facebook: Fünf WhatsApp-Alternativen im Überblick Es gibt viele Gründe, WhatsApp abzulehen. Die richtige Messaging-Alternative zu finden, ist aber alles andere als leicht. Es gibt kaum eine App, die im Leben so vieler Menschen eine Rolle spielt wie Whatsapp. 2009 von Jan Koum und Brian Acton gegründet, entwickelte sich der Dienst rasant zu einer Konkurrenz für SMS und andere Messenger, die auf veraltete Protokolle setzten. Zu Beginn war die Anwendung nicht mehr als eine Art schwarzes Brett für Statusmeldungen. Nutzer konnten ihre Gedanken posten, Freunde hatten die Möglichkeit, diese Meldungen zu lesen. Mit der Zeit verwandelten die Entwickler ihre Erfindung in einen Kurznachrichtendienst. Die Vorteile von Whatsapp damals lagen auf der Hand: plattformübergreifende Kommunikation mit dem Smartphone und das auch noch kostenlos. Eine einfache Registrierung und der ebenfalls mögliche Austausch von Fotos und Videos taten das Übrige dazu. Seitdem ist viel Zeit vergangen und in der Welt von WhatsApp hat sich einiges getan. Nach der Übernahme durch Facebook für 19 Milliarden US-Dollar entstanden bei so manchem Nutzer Sorgenfalten. Der Umgang mit Nutzerdaten durch das soziale Netzwerk wurde schon damals kritisch beäugt. Befürchtungen, dass WhatsApp ein ähnliches Schicksal droht, waren alles andere als unbegründet. Zusicherungen, dass sich nichts verändert und die beiden Erfinder das Ruder in der Hand behalten würden, sollten besorgte Nutzer beruhigen. Auch die Implementierung von End-to-End-Verschlüsselung brachte etwas Ruhe. Mittlerweile sind die Gründer aus Unzufriedenheit nicht mehr bei Facebook am Werk, der Zuckerberg-Konzern hat mit der Verschmelzung seiner Plattformen begonnen und bald soll auch Werbung in der App erscheinen.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication and Security Survey Results from US, UK and German Business Leaders
    The most secure collaboration platform. Communication and Security Survey results from US, UK and German business leaders Communication and Security Survey | wire.com | February 2019 1 An introduction Every year we ask executives about key topics - this year we chose to focus on communication, security, privacy, and regulation as these have been hot topics in 2018. We asked more than 300 executives from US and Europe about their views on these topics. In addition, please find at the end of this presentation my personal predictions for 2019. We trust you will enjoy the report. Morten Brøgger · CEO Best regards, Morten Brøgger Chief Executive Officer at Wire Communication and Security Survey | wire.com | February 2019 2 Are we still secure? Many organizations have been a …. want their organization to be more proactive victim of a cyberattack and not a 81% in the ways it protects its sensitive information, single respondent disagreed that communication, and/or data. cybersecurity is a major challenge for businesses. Yet while the challenges posed by cybersecurity are understood …. believe security and compliance are key by businesses, some organizations 79% parameters when selecting cloud business aren’t doing enough to prepare. In crisis solutions. situations, in particular, businesses have gaps in their ability to communicate internally and externally in a safe and secure way. …. of organizations don’t have or are unsure if they 38% have, a plan in case of a security breach. …. of respondents said it would be useful to be 83% able to extend a company's secure communication infrastructure to business partners and customers Communication and Security Survey | wire.com | February 2019 3 Emails are popular, Email remains a popular communication to changes in instant messaging but are they tool yet business leaders spend too technology, an overwhelming number much of their time using it.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Analysis of the Signal Protocol Student: Bc
    ASSIGNMENT OF MASTER’S THESIS Title: Security Analysis of the Signal Protocol Student: Bc. Jan Rubín Supervisor: Ing. Josef Kokeš Study Programme: Informatics Study Branch: Computer Security Department: Department of Computer Systems Validity: Until the end of summer semester 2018/19 Instructions 1) Research the current instant messaging protocols, describe their properties, with a particular focus on security. 2) Describe the Signal protocol in detail, its usage, structure, and functionality. 3) Select parts of the protocol with a potential for security vulnerabilities. 4) Analyze these parts, particularly the adherence of their code to their documentation. 5) Discuss your findings. Formulate recommendations for the users. References Will be provided by the supervisor. prof. Ing. Róbert Lórencz, CSc. doc. RNDr. Ing. Marcel Jiřina, Ph.D. Head of Department Dean Prague January 27, 2018 Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Information Technology Department of Computer Systems Master’s thesis Security Analysis of the Signal Protocol Bc. Jan Rub´ın Supervisor: Ing. Josef Kokeˇs 1st May 2018 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis supervisor, Ing. Josef Kokeˇs,for his guidance, engagement, extensive know- ledge, and willingness to meet at our countless consultations. I would also like to thank my brother, Tom´aˇsRub´ın,for proofreading my thesis. I cannot express enough gratitude towards my parents, Lenka and Jaroslav Rub´ınovi, who supported me both morally and financially through my whole studies. Last but not least, this thesis would not be possible without Anna who re- lentlessly supported me when I needed it most. Declaration I hereby declare that the presented thesis is my own work and that I have cited all sources of information in accordance with the Guideline for adhering to ethical principles when elaborating an academic final thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Use Style: Paper Title
    Forensic Investigations of Popular Ephemeral Messaging Applications on Android and iOS Platforms M A Hannan Bin Azhar, Rhys Cox and Aimee Chamberlain School of Engineering, Technology and Design Canterbury Christ Church University Canterbury, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Abstract—Ephemeral messaging applications are growing It is not just criminals using EMAs. Mobile phones are an increasingly popular on the digital mobile market. However, essential part of modern-day life. According to the Global they are not always used with good intentions. Criminals may System for Mobile Communications [6], there were five see a gateway into private communication with each other billion mobile users in the world by the second quarter of through this transient application data. This could negatively 2017, with a prediction that another 620 million people will impact criminal court cases for evidence, or civil matters. To become mobile phone users by 2020, together that would find out if messages from such applications can indeed be account for almost three quarters of the world population. Due recovered or not, a forensic examination of the device would be to the increasing popularity in mobile phones, there is required by the law enforcement authority. This paper reports naturally an increasing concern over mobile security and how mobile forensic investigations of ephemeral data from a wide range of applications using both proprietary and freeware safe communication between individuals or groups is. It is forensic tools. Both Android and iOS platforms were used in the known that EMAs can be used in civil concerns such as investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wire Security Whitepaper
    Wire Security Whitepaper Wire Swiss GmbH∗ March 3, 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Application layer 2 3 Registration 2 3.1 User Registration . .3 3.1.1 Registration by e-mail . .3 3.1.2 Registration by phone . .3 3.1.3 Passwords . .4 3.1.4 Further data . .4 3.2 Client registration . .4 3.2.1 Further data . .5 3.2.2 Metadata . .6 3.2.3 Notifications . .6 3.3 Push token registration . .6 4 Authentication 6 4.1 Tokens . .6 4.2 Login . .7 4.2.1 Password login . .8 4.2.2 SMS login . .8 4.3 Password Reset . .8 5 Messaging 8 5.1 End-to-end encryption . .9 5.1.1 Prekeys . .9 5.2 Message exchange and client discovery . .9 5.3 Assets . 10 5.4 Notifications . 11 6 Calling 12 6.1 Call signaling . 12 ∗[email protected] 1 6.2 Media transport . 12 6.3 Encryption . 12 6.4 WebRTC . 13 A Cookie and access token format 13 1 Introduction Wire runs on Android and iOS devices, on Windows and OS X as well as on the Web in browsers. Registered users engage in conversations whose contents are synchronized across all devices of a user. This document provides an overview on the cryptographic protocols and security aspects implemented to protect the privacy of users. 2 Application layer Wire clients interact with backend servers over HTTPS connections supporting the following TLS parameters: TLS versions • TLSv1.0 • TLSv1.1 • TLSv1.2 The server indicates the order preference of cipher suites and communicates HTTP Strict Transport Security [2] to all clients.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Device Secure Instant Messaging
    SoK: Multi-Device Secure Instant Messaging Antonio Dimeo, Felix Gohla, Daniel Goßen, Niko Lockenvitz {antonio.dimeo, felix.gohla, daniel.gossen, niko.lockenvitz}@student.hpi.de Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam April 17, 2021 Abstract The secure multi-device instant messaging ecosystem is diverse, varied, and under- represented in academia. We create a systematization of knowledge which focuses on the challenges of multi-device messaging in a secure context and give an overview of the current situation in the multi-device setting. For that, we analyze messenger documentation, white papers, and research that deals with multi-device messaging. This includes a detailed description of different patterns for data transfer between devices as well as device management, i.e. how clients are cryptographically linked or unlinked to or from an account and how the initial setup can be implemented. We then evaluate different instant messengers with regard to relevant criteria, e.g. whether they achieve specific security, usability, and privacy goals. In the end, we outline interesting areas for future research. Contents 1 Introduction3 1.1 Group Messaging vs. Multi-Device Messaging............... 4 1.2 Methodology.................................. 4 2 Multi-Device Messaging7 2.1 Context...................................... 7 2.2 Transferring Data Between Different Devices of One User........ 7 2.2.1 Storing Data on a Server........................ 8 2.2.2 Using Messages to Exchange Data.................. 9 2.3 Transferring Data to a Different User..................... 11 2.3.1 Without End-to-end Encryption................... 11 2.3.2 End-to-end Encryption With Shared Group Key.......... 13 2.3.3 End-to-end Encryption Per Recipient...............
    [Show full text]
  • Security and Privacy of Secure Messaging Services
    Security and Privacy of Secure Messaging Services A Case Study of Wire DIPLOMARBEIT zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Diplom-Ingenieur im Rahmen des Studiums Software Engineering & Internet Computing eingereicht von Andreas Boll, BSc Matrikelnummer 0825205 an der Fakultät für Informatik der Technischen Universität Wien Betreuung: Privatdoz. Mag.rer.soc.oec. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Edgar Weippl Mitwirkung: Univ.Lektor Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Georg Merzdovnik, BSc Die approbierte gedruckte Originalversion dieser Diplomarbeit ist an der TU Wien Bibliothek verfügbar. The approved original version of this thesis is available in print at TU Wien Bibliothek. Wien, 3. März 2020 Andreas Boll Edgar Weippl Technische Universität Wien A-1040 Wien Karlsplatz 13 Tel. +43-1-58801-0 www.tuwien.at Die approbierte gedruckte Originalversion dieser Diplomarbeit ist an der TU Wien Bibliothek verfügbar. The approved original version of this thesis is available in print at TU Wien Bibliothek. Security and Privacy of Secure Messaging Services A Case Study of Wire DIPLOMA THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Diplom-Ingenieur in Software Engineering & Internet Computing by Andreas Boll, BSc Registration Number 0825205 to the Faculty of Informatics at the TU Wien Advisor: Privatdoz. Mag.rer.soc.oec. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Edgar Weippl Assistance: Univ.Lektor Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Georg Merzdovnik, BSc Die approbierte gedruckte Originalversion dieser Diplomarbeit ist an der TU Wien Bibliothek verfügbar. The approved original version of this thesis is available in print at TU Wien Bibliothek. Vienna, 3rd March, 2020 Andreas Boll Edgar Weippl Technische Universität Wien A-1040 Wien Karlsplatz 13 Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Case 2:16-cv-02340-AB-PJW Document 1 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Bruce E. Van Dalsem (Bar No. 124128) 2 ([email protected]) Daniel C. Posner (Bar No. 232009) 3 ([email protected]) Alex Bergjans (Bar No. 302830) 4 ([email protected]) 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 5 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 6 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Wire Swiss GmbH 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 WIRE SWISS GmbH , a Swiss CASE NO. 2:16 -cv -2340 corporation; 13 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR 14 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF v. NON -INFRINGEMENT; EXTORTION 15 QUIET RIDDLE VENTURES, LLC 16 d/b/a OPEN WHISPER SYSTEMS; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL and MOXIE MARLINSPIKE aka 17 MATTHEW ROSENFELD and/or MIKE BENHAM, an individual, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT Case 2:16-cv-02340-AB-PJW Document 1 Filed 04/06/16 Page 2 of 9 Page ID #:2 1 Plaintiff Wire Swiss GmbH (“Wire Swiss”) alleges against defendants Quiet 2 Riddle Ventures LLC dba Open Whisper Systems (“Open Whisper Systems”) and 3 Moxie Marlinspike, aka Matthew Rosenfield and/or Mike Benham (“Marlinspike,” 4 and collectively with Open Whisper Systems, “Defendants”), as follows: 5 NATURE OF THE ACTION 6 1. This is an action for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of 7 copyright. As alleged in further detail below, Defendants claim copyright in certain 8 open-source software code used for encrypting data communications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Secure Collaboration Platform. Welcome to Wire!
    1 User guide Welcome to the most secure collaboration platform. Welcome to Wire! © Wire Swiss GmbH 2 Content Welcome to Wire Creating a team Joining a team Navigating Wire Desktop and web Mobile Guest rooms Troubleshooting Resources © Wire Swiss GmbH 3 Getting started 1. Creating a team 2. Setting up an account 3. Inviting people to the team 4. Assigning user roles © Wire Swiss GmbH 4 Team creation Start by creating a team on wire.com. Enter your organization’s name as the team name. Finishing the steps will give you access to the team admin panel. You can now invite more people from the organization to join Wire to start talking, calling, sharing files and more. Create a team Create Setup Roles Invite © Wire Swiss GmbH 5 Account setup As the Team Owner you register on behalf of the organization and will be granted Team Owner privileges. You will receive an email to confirm your identity before the account is operational. Learn about the different roles Create Setup Roles Invite © Wire Swiss GmbH 6 Account verification You will now need to check the email with which you signed up. There will be a message from Wire with your verification code. Verify the account with the code you received in the email and your team is ready for use. You are now the Team Owner and ready to understand the roles of the people in your organization and how to invite new team members. Create Setup Roles Invite © Wire Swiss GmbH 7 Team Owner As a team owner, you have full control over who is part of your organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain-Based End-To-End Encryption for Matrix Instant Messaging
    Alma Mater Studiorum · Università di Bologna SCUOLA DI SCIENZE Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Informatica Blockchain-based end-to-end encryption for Matrix instant messaging Relatore: Presentata da: Chiar.mo Prof. Julian Sparber Stefano Ferretti Correlatore: Chiar.mo Mirko Zichichi I Sessione: 15/07/2020 Anno Accademico 2019/2020 I dedicate this work to everyone who helped me in the past or will help me in the future to write a thesis, a blogpost, an email or any written text. Thanks to them I was able to overcome the challenges that my dyslexia posed and get this far in my academic career. Abstract Privacy and security in online communications is an important topic to- day, especially in the context of instant messaging. A lot of progress has been made in recent years to ensure that digital conversations are secure against attacks by third parties, but privacy from the service provider itself remains difficult. There are a number of solutions offering end-to-end encryption, but most of them rely on a centralized server, proprietary clients, or both. In order to have fully secure instant messaging conversations a decentralized and end-to-end encrypted communication protocol is needed. This means there is no single point of control, and each message is encryped directly on the user’s device in a way that only the recipient can decrypt it. This work proposes an end-to-end encryption system for the Matrix protocol based on blockchain technology. Matrix is a decentralized protocol and net- work for real-time communication that is currently mostly used for instant messaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Wire Security Review – Phase 2 – Web, Calling for Wire Swiss Gmbh
    Wire Security ReVIEW – Phase 2 – Web, Calling FOR Wire Swiss GmbH Final Report 2018-03-07 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Contents 1 Summary 2 2 Findings 3 2.1 WEB Application . .4 2.2 Calling . 12 3 About 18 1 1 Summary This REPORT DOCUMENTS THE fiNDINGS IDENTIfiED IN THE Wire WEB APPLICATION AND CALLING components. FROM A TOTAL OF SEVEN VULNERABILITIES THAT WERE DISCOVERED DURING THE test, ONE WAS CLASSIfiED AS HIGH SEVERITY, fiVE AS medium, AND ONE AS LOW. No OBSERVATIONS WITHOUT A DIRECT SECURITY IMPACT HAVE BEEN made. The ISSUE WITH THE HIGHEST SEVERITY WAS AN OUTDATED JavaScript FRAMEWORK THAT COULD POTENTIALLY ALLOW INJECTION ATTACKS AGAINST THE application. All IDENTIfiED VULNERABILITIES EXCEPT FOR A DoS ISSUE REQUIRE PRECONDITIONS TO BE EXPLOITED SUCCESSFULLY. The MAIN Wire REPOSITORIES COVERED DURING THE REVIEW ARE wire-webapp AND wire-audio- video-signaling. This REVIEW DOES NOT COVer: • CODE OF audio/VIDEO CODECS AND THE WebRTC implementation; • CODE OF third-party DEPENDENCIES AND TEMPLATE engines. Wire HAS PATCHED OR MITIGATED THE DISCOVERED VULNERABILITIES AFTER THEY WERE reported. The WORK WAS PERFORMED BETWEEN March 7th AND July 5th, 2017, BY Jean-Philippe Aumasson (Kudelski Security) AND Markus VERVIER (X41 D-Sec GmbH). A TOTAL OF 7.5 person-daYS WERE spent, WITH MOST OF THE TIME SPENT REVIEWING CODE AND INVESTIGATING POTENTIAL SECURITY issues. 2 2 Findings This SECURITY REVIEW REPORT COVERS SEVERAL COMPONENTS OF THE Wire SUITE OF applications: • The WEB APPLICATION (section 2.1) • Signalling COMPONENTS OF THE CALLING PROTOCOL (section 2.2) The WORK WAS PERFORMED BETWEEN March AND July 2017, WITH A TOTAL OF 4.5 person-daYS (Kudelski Security) AND 3 person-daYS (X41 D-Sec).
    [Show full text]
  • Overview - Data Protection & IT Security Issues Regarding Video Conferencing Systems
    Overview - Data Protection & IT Security issues regarding video conferencing systems 13 May 2020 Ulrich Bäumer & Oliver Rohn osborneclarke.com Introduction • Many companies and also consumers now use different video conference services • This presentation shall serve as an overview about some of the most popular video conference service providers and shall give you an idea which applications, systems or platforms can (or should not) be used for a specific purpose • This overview is not exhaustive and we do not make recommendations for individual offers as the requirements vary 1 osborneclarke.com Overview 1. Microsoft Teams 2. Skype for Business 3. Cisco Webex 4. Google Meet 5. GoToMeeting 6. Zoom 7. Eyeson 8. Wire 9. BlueJeans 10. Jitsi Meet 2 osborneclarke.com 1. Microsoft Teams Microsoft Teams (“MS Teams”) is an application that allows groups of people to come together into a shared digital space to communicate and collaborate in real time with one another. These groups are called 'Teams' and can be set up to limit access to only those people that shall be included. Once included in a 'Team', members can engage in continuous, social media style conversation with one another. It also allows those people to collaborate on documentation, where real-time amendments can be made and seen by multiple people at the same time. MS Teams is also the long term replacement for Skype for Business. As a Microsoft product, MS Teams is subject to the company’s privacy policy (https://privacy.microsoft.com/en- GB/privacystatement). Amongst others, the following data is collected: • Environmental information such as device and operating system versions, regional and language settings, counters for sign-in attempts and failures; Usage data such as number of calls made, number of IMs sent or received, number of meetings joined, frequency of features used, and stability issues; Error report data such as information about performance and reliability, device configuration, network connection quality, error codes, error logs, and exceptions.
    [Show full text]