DOCSLIB.ORG

Indigenous Experiences with Online Voting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indigenous Experiences with Online Voting Indigenous Experiences with Online Voting May 2021 FN DIGITAL DEMOCRACY REPORT 1 This report is reflective of community-engaged work with the folllowing partners: This report is supported in part by the following organizations: FN DIGITAL DEMOCRACY REPORT 2 Table of Contents Note to the Reader ........................................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................6 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................9 Indigenous Elections and COVID-19 ................................................................................................... 11 Background on Indigenous Governance and Elections .............................................................12 First Nation Elections and Ratification Processes ........................................................................14 Definitions and Methodology .................................................................................................................15 Definitions ....................................................................................................................................................15 Indigenous .............................................................................................................................................15 Online Voting ........................................................................................................................................16 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................................17 A Community-Engaged Approach...............................................................................................18 Current Climate for Online Voting ....................................................................................................... 20 Attitudes Toward Online Voting .......................................................................................................... 20 Indigenous Perspectives Toward Online Voting ............................................................................22 Online Voting: Benefits and Barriers .................................................................................................. 24 Benefits and Barriers from Indigenous Perspectives ................................................................ 29 Community Profiles .....................................................................................................................................32 General Overview .....................................................................................................................................32 Wasauksing First Nation .......................................................................................................................33 Community Context ...........................................................................................................................33 Rationale for Use .................................................................................................................................34 Implementation ...................................................................................................................................35 FN DIGITAL DEMOCRACY REPORT 3 Outcomes and Lessons Learned .................................................................................................. 36 Nipissing First Nation ..............................................................................................................................37 Community Context ...........................................................................................................................37 Rationale for Use .................................................................................................................................37 Implementation .................................................................................................................................. 38 Outcomes and Lessons Learned ................................................................................................ 39 Tsuut’ina Nation ....................................................................................................................................... 40 Community Context .......................................................................................................................... 40 Rationale for Use ................................................................................................................................ 40 Implementation ...................................................................................................................................41 Outcomes and Lessons Learned ................................................................................................ 42 Good Practices ............................................................................................................................................. 44 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................... 50 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................51 Priorities and Next Steps ..........................................................................................................................57 References...................................................................................................................................................... 58 Authors ............................................................................................................................................................. 64 FN DIGITAL DEMOCRACY REPORT 4 Note to the Reader Additional details about the authors are included at the end of the report. The writing of this report would not have been possible without the contributions of many people. Very special thanks to Brian Budd (University of Guelph), Liam Midzain- Gobin (Brock University) and Valerie O’Brien (McMaster University) for their support and meaningful contributions to the report. The authors extend their gratitude to the communities who contributed to this knowledge and engaged with the authors: Tsuut’ina Nation, Wasauksing First Nation, Nipissing First Nation and others. Sincere thanks to those who participated in interviews to inform the report and its recommendations: Stephen Beamish, Fred Bellefeuille, Cree Big Plume, Marc Boivin, Cassandra Cadeau, Richard Catahan, James Claiborne, Vanessa Eagletail, Aleksander Essex, Amanda Goodrunning, Jennifer Greengrass, Alison Heavenfire, Joyce Tekahnawaiiks King, Jean-Pierre Kingsley, Steven Lattey, Lawrence Lewis, Rob McMahon, Dwayne Nashkawa, Stéphane Perrault, Jolene Pewapisconias, Chris Piper, Jennifer Predie, Michel Roussel, Gwendoline Savoy, Barbara Simons, Dean Smith, Ryan Tabobodung, Sue Torosian, Roxanne Warrior, and Patti Wight. Special thanks to Sarah Byrne, Genevieve Lessard, Julie Pellerin, Jennifer Predie, and Meaghan Squire for their comments and suggestions, and to Aleksander Essex for assistance with technical components of the report. Thank you to Christy Paddick and Amanda Tieber for support with copyediting and to Dan Brandon for copy design. We would also like to acknowledge and thank the participants of the Centre for e-Democracy’s 2016 Online Voting Roundtable, whose voices brought an important perspective to debates of electoral reform and online voting. The Roundtable and much of the research that informs this report is part of a research project, entitled, First Nations Digital Democracy, which was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Partnership Development Grant. Any errors or omissions in the report are our own. FN DIGITAL DEMOCRACY REPORT 5 Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to examine the opportunities and challenges online voting presents for participation and governance in First Nations in Canada. Specifically, the report draws on the experiences of three First Nations: Tsuut’ina Nation, Wasauksing First Nation and Nipissing First Nation. The research for this report was conducted by Dr. Chelsea Gabel (McMaster University) and Dr. Nicole Goodman (Brock University), who were contracted in September 2017 by Indigenous Affairs and Northern Development Canada to survey community views on online voting and produce a report. Guided by a community-engaged research process, our approach to the project included the following methods: (1) 27 semi-structured interviews and a focus group; (2) a 2016 Online Voting Roundtable; (3) a community-engaged research project entitled First Nations Digital Democracy and d) local employment and capacity building. Significant input was provided by First Nations at every stage of the process, including feedback of the draft report and its recommendations. Overall, the report finds that online voting is appealing to First Nations as a way to enhance participation, self-determination and governance. In particular, it can serve as a tool to improve voting accessibility and engagement for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cues Or Content: Explaining Vote Choice in the Dutch 2018 Referendum on the Intelligence and Security Services Act
    Political Science master’s thesis January 2019 Radboud University, Nijmegen Cues or Content: Explaining vote choice in the Dutch 2018 referendum on the Intelligence and Security Services Act Sander Heikens s4837134 Supervisor: Dr. K. Jacobs Abstract A recurring argument against democracy, both in its direct and representative forms, is that ‘the people’ are not capable of making good political decisions. For decades, researchers have concluded that the median voter does not have the political knowledge thought necessary to cast a sensible and well- informed vote. More recently, this view was challenged through the concept of heuristics: information shortcuts that allow people to make choices not based primarily on encyclopaedic knowledge, but on things like personal experiences, the media, and the opinions of others. The idea that people make heavy use of heuristics when they decide on a vote has become broadly accepted in political science. However, much is still unclear about the role played by these information shortcuts in the context of direct democracy in Europe. Using survey data and logistic regression, I examine how vote choice in the Dutch 2018 referendum on the Intelligence and Security Services Act was affected by heuristics use, as well as by voters’ personal views on the factual referendum content. The results indicate that the referendum subject matter was the primary factor of influence. Voters’ personal opinions regarding the referendum content proved to be a strong predictor of whether a Yes- or No- vote was cast, and this did not change when the influence of four popular types of information shortcuts was controlled for.
    [Show full text]
  • Titel Der Präsentation
    Bundeskanzlei BK Sektion Politische Rechte E-voting in Switzerland – Overview and recent developments Lochau/Bregenz, 28 October 2014 Beat Kuoni, project coordinator Basic conditions • Direct democracy: referenda take place four times a year • Federalist system: Ground rules laid down by the confederation Cantons regulate the details Confederation specifies when a vote will be held Cantons organize and conduct referenda and elections • Postal voting introduced across the board in CH: Each voter automatically receives postal vote documents and may cast their vote by post without additional requirements Remote voting in CH already the standard E-Voting in Switzerland 2 Beat Kuoni, BK Retrospective view 2000 Project start 2002 First Federal Council report on the opportunities, risks and feasibility of electronic voting Feasibility studies and conducting pilot trials 2006 Second Federal Council report on the pilot projects 2009 Cantons start hosting others 2011 Federal elections (E-Voters: Swiss living abroad registered in four cantons) 2013 Third Federal Council report on e-voting 2014 New legal bases for e-voting on federal level E-Voting in Switzerland 3 Beat Kuoni, BK E-voting trials • Swiss direct democracy (elections and referenda) • Over 190 trials were conducted on the occasion of 30 federal referenda and elections • Most recent trial on 28 September 2014 (referendum): 170,000 voters from 12 cantons authorised to vote electronically 26,000 voters cast their votes electronically (= 15.3%) • Next trial on 30 November 2014 (referendum) E-Voting in Switzerland 4 Beat Kuoni, BK Legal basis – Overview • Federal Act on Political Rights (Art. 8a) • Federal Ordinance on Political Rights (Art. 27a–27q) • Federal Chancellery Ordinance on Electronic Voting (VEleS; since 2014) • Technical and administrative requirements for electronic vote casting (Annex to VEleS; since 2014) E-Voting in Switzerland 5 Beat Kuoni, BK Federal Ordinance on Political Rights • Principles for electronic voting (Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Germann Serd Lt ES Postsprint.Pdf
    Citation for published version: Germann, M & Serdült, U 2017, 'Internet Voting and Turnout: Evidence from Switzerland', Electoral Studies, vol. 47, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.03.001 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.03.001 Publication date: 2017 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication Publisher Rights CC BY-NC-ND University of Bath Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 Internet Voting and Turnout: Evidence from Switzerland Micha Germann∗ Uwe Serd¨ultyz Forthcoming in Electoral Studies Abstract Internet voting (i-voting) is often discussed as a potential remedy against declining turnout rates. This paper presents new evidence on the causal effect of i-voting on turnout, drawing on trials conducted in two Swiss cantons: Geneva and Zurich. Both Geneva and Zurich constitute hard cases for i-voting, given that i-voting was introduced in the presence of postal voting. However, this setting allows us to test some of the more optimistic claims regarding i-voting's ability to increase turnout. Empirically, we exploit the advantageous circumstance that federal leg- islation created a situation coming close to a natural experiment, with some of Geneva's and Zurich's municipalities participating in i-voting trials and others not.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Voting: Switzerland's Projects and Their Legal Framework – in a European Context
    E-Voting: Switzerland's Projects and their Legal Framework – in a European Context Nadja Braun Swiss Federal Chancellery Bundeshaus West CH-3003 Bern, SWITZERLAND [email protected] Abstract: Firstly, the reader is introduced to the Swiss political system, which can be described as a federalist state with direct democracy. Secondly, the Swiss e- voting pilot projects will be presented, against the background of the political system. Switzerland runs three pilot projects in order to test the feasibility of e- voting. In a third part the legal framework of e-voting in Switzerland is highlighted. In a fourth part the work of the Council of Europe is addressed. A last part contains Recommendations to the Swiss legislator. Today, the legal scheme allows for pilot projects. Should e-voting be introduced in Switzerland, the legal basis has to be adapted, taking into account the experience acquired through the pilot projects, and the Council of Europe’s Recommendation on e-voting. 1 Introduction 1.1 Switzerland – a federalist state with direct democracy Switzerland is well known for its direct democracy. All Swiss citizens over the age of eighteen10 may take part in elections to the National Council (main chamber of the Federal Parliament) both actively and passively. They may also cast their vote in popular ballots.11 A referendum12 is compulsory for all amendments to the Constitution and for membership to some international organisations.13 A vote must be held in such cases. In addition, voters have the right to initiative14 and referendum15, which means that they 10 Except for those who have been incapacitated on grounds of mental illness or mental disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote by Mail: International Practice During COVID-19
    VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE Vote by Mail: International Practice During COVID-19 -A- Vote by Mail: International Practice During COVID-19 Author: Manuel Wally, Ph.D. Legal Advisor Contributor: Alan Wall Electoral Expert Editors: Katherine Ellena Senior Global Legal Advisor, IFES Erica Shein Director of the Center for Applied Research and Learning, IFES Staffan Darnolf, Ph.D. Senior Global Electoral Operations and Administration Advisor, IFES Vote by Mail: International Practice During COVID-19 Copyright © 2020 International Foundation for Electoral Systems. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of IFES. Requests for permission should include the following information: A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive, Floor 10 Arlington, VA 22202 Email: [email protected] Phone: 202.350.6700 Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Investing 85 Cents Per Voter to Increase Voter Turnout by 4 Percent
    The Elasticity of Voter Turnout: Investing 85 Cents per Voter to Increase Voter Turnout by 4 Percent Mark Schelker Marco Schneiter CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 5617 CATEGORY 2: PUBLIC CHOICE ORIGINAL VERSION: NOVEMBER 2015 THIS VERSION: JULY 2017 An electronic version of the paper may be downloaded • from the SSRN website: www.SSRN.com • from the RePEc website: www.RePEc.org • from the CESifo website: www.CESifoT -group.org/wpT ISSN 2364-1428 CESifo Working Paper No. 5617 The Elasticity of Voter Turnout: Investing 85 Cents per Voter to Increase Voter Turnout by 4 Percent Abstract In the aftermath of elections or ballots, the legitimacy of the result is regularly debated if voter turnout was considered to be low. Hence, discussions about legal reforms to increase turnout are common in most democracies. We analyze the impact of a very small change in voting costs on voter turnout. Some municipalities in the Swiss Canton of Berne reduced voting costs by prepaying the postage of the return envelope (CHF 0.85). Prepaid postage is associated with a statistically significant 1.8 percentage point increase in voter turnout. Overall, this amounts to 4 percent more voters participating in the ballots. Moreover, we estimate the influence of this increase in turnout on party support in popular ballots. We find that social democrats and environmentalists see their relative support decline. JEL-Codes: D720. Keywords: voting cost, postal voting, voter turnout, party support. Mark Schelker* Marco Schneiter Department of Economics Department of Economics University of Fribourg University of Fribourg Bd. de Pérolles 90 Bd. de Pérolles 90 Switzerland – 1700 Fribourg Switzerland – 1700 Fribourg [email protected] [email protected] *corresponding author July 2017 This paper has been accepted for publication in Electoral Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • SWISS REVIEW the Magazine for the Swiss Abroad April 2020
    SWISS REVIEW The magazine for the Swiss Abroad April 2020 The return of the wolf – why not everyone is happy Whither e-voting? The Federal Councillor gives us his take Leysin – the Swiss mountain village where foreign nationals outnumber locals The publisher of “Swiss Review” is the Organisation of the Swiss Abroad (OSA). The best way to experience Switzerland. Bernina at Lago Bianco Express Simply beautiful, simply comfortable: Enjoy easy-going travel to any place in Switzerland – by train, bus and boat. Thanks to the world’s densest traffic networkMySwitzerland.com/swisstravelsystem 200210 STS Add ASO EN-DE-FR-IT-ES.indd 2 11.02.20 14:22 Contents Editorial 3 How does the story with the wolf go? 4 Mailbag “My, what a big mouth you have, grandmother.” “All the better to eat you with!” The wolf dressed as the 6 Focus grandmother had scarcely finished speaking when he The wolf is back in Switzerland – jumped from the bed with a single leap and ate up and likely to stay poor Little Red Riding Hood. As soon as the wolf had satisfied his appetite, he climbed back into bed, fell 10 Politics asleep and began to snore very loudly. We all know SVP initiative puts Swiss-EU relations how Little Red Riding Hood met her gruesome end. to the test Never trust the big bad wolf was the message we all took to heart as young Simonetta Sommaruga, the garden- children. loving president of the Confederation Fairy tale will flirt with reality in May, when Switzerland decides whether or not the wolf is still big and bad.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editor: Transversalism, the Death of Civic Education
    International Journal of Instruction January 2021 ● Vol.14, No.1 e-ISSN: 1308-1470 ● www.e-iji.net p-ISSN: 1694-609X pp. i-vii Transversalism, the Death of Civic Education Dear Readers, A few years ago, a group of citizens from canton Ticino (TI) launched an initiative to amend the canton school law. Their goal was to introduce a new education branch called “Education to Civism, Citizenship and Direct Democracy”, which should rely on a legal basis adopted by a specific vote of the cantonal parliament; such a branch should be compulsory and taught for at least two hours per month. Simultaneously, they asked the Institute of Federalism to carry out a comparative study about civic education in Switzerland. The study proved quite complicated to complete because of federalism in education and the consequent difficulty to find the relevant documentation in the 26 cantons. Nevertheless, a long and patient research work delivered scientifically based earnings. It enlightened mainly a big gap between, on the one side, the unanimous recognition of the importance of this branch, and on the other side the lack of means attributed, combined with a dangerous drift towards transversalism. The study is obviously too long to be extensively presented here, but its main teachings deserve to be recalled, if only because they have universal value. After an introduction (1.), our brief presentation will be divided in three parts. Firstly the acknowledgment of the Swiss students mediocrity in civic education (2.). Secondly, some comments about the paradigm shift which contributed to create this disappointing ii From the Editor: Transversalism, the Death of Civic … situation (3.).
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of I-Voting – Practices, Rules and Perspectives
    DOI : 10.14746/pp.2017.22.4.6 Magdalena MUSIAŁ-KARG Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Challenges of i-voting – practices, rules and perspectives. Examples from Estonia and Switzerland 1Abstract: This paper discusses the experience related to selected European states implementing i-voting. Particular emphasis is given in the text to the issues of the definition of internet voting (as one of the forms of electronic voting); the analysis of experiences gathered by states with a history of the implementation of internet voting; and the procedures of vote casting via Internet. The main goal of this text is to answer the questions of the greatest risks and benefits of internet voting, the influence i-voting has on voter turnout and the future prospects of i-voting. The considerations presented here focus on the experiences of two states with apparently the greatest experience in the field of i-voting, namely Estonia and Switzerland. Key words: i-voting, Internet voting, Estonia, Switzerland he influence of ICT on political processes and state-citizen relations is described in Tsuch terms as digital democracy, cyberdemocracy, virtual democracy and the most frequent one – electronic democracy. Whatever the term applied and its definition, all these concepts share the conviction that new technologies (ensuring interactivity, fast- er information transfer and feedback) allow democratic mechanisms to be influenced. Members of academia, in particular representatives of political science, primarily focus on the influence ICT has on the operation of the democratic system. The growing role of the Internet (as the most vigorously changing ICT tool) in the broadly understood poli- tics and its increasingly significant influence on society appear to be among the crucial arguments to undertake studies in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Voting for Expatriates: the Swiss Case
    JeDEM 6(2): 197-215, 2014 ISSN 2075-9517 http://www.jedem.org Internet Voting for Expatriates: The Swiss Case Micha Germann Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA) at the University of Zurich, Centre for Comparative and International Studies at ETH Zurich, [email protected] Uwe Serdült Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA) at the University of Zurich, [email protected] Abstract: In 2008 the first Swiss canton introduced internet voting for expatriates, complementing the trials involving residents initiated back in 2003. More cantons soon followed, and as of this writing, expatriates from 12 out of the 26 cantons can vote online. This paper focuses on the second phase in the Swiss i-voting roll-out involving expatriates. We address three questions at the core of the internet voting research agenda. First, the popularity question: to what extent do expatriates make use of the new online voting channel? Second, the ‘who’ question: what is the profile of the typical expatriate i-voter? Finally, the turnout question: did the extension of internet voting to expatriates have an effect on electoral mobilisation? Our findings indicate that the online channel is very popular among expatriates, both when compared to other trials in Switzerland and internationally. Leaving aside i-voting’s comparatively high popularity, familiar patterns seem to replicate in the expatriate trials. Expatriate i-voters tend to be young, male, and there is some evidence of an upper-class bias. Thus, use of the online channel by expatriates seems also driven by the digital divide. Finally, similarly to the residents’ trials, we find some evidence that i-voting does not affect electoral mobilisation.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPULSORY VOTING, HABIT FORMATION, and POLITICAL PARTICIPATION Michael M
    COMPULSORY VOTING, HABIT FORMATION, AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION Michael M. Bechtel, Dominik Hangartner, and Lukas Schmid* Abstract—Can electoral institutions induce lasting changes in citizens’ vot- We explore these questions by studying a citizenry that ing habits? We study the long-term and spillover effects of compulsory voting in the Swiss canton of Vaud (1900–1970) and find that this inter- has been exposed to a sanctioned compulsory voting law vention increases turnout in federal referendums by 30 percentage points. for over twenty years. Theories of habitual voting (Weber, However, despite its magnitude, the effect disappears quickly after voting 1968; Almond & Verba, 1963; Lijphart, 1997; Plutzer, 2002; is no longer compulsory. We find minor spillover effects on related forms Gerber, Green, & Shachar, 2003; Fowler, 2006) predict that of political participation that also vanish immediately after compulsory voting has been abolished. Overall, these results question habit formation citizens develop a voting habit under compulsory voting arguments in the context of compulsory voting. because they are more likely to having repeatedly engaged in this activity. Consistent with this reasoning, recent empir- ical work on the formation of voting habits documents that I. Introduction those who voted in today’s election are also more likely to ARTICIPATION in elections is the most widespread participate in subsequent elections (Meredith, 2009; Fuji- Pform of civic engagement and a key mechanism through wara, Meng, & Vogl, 2016). This habit formation argument which citizens can hold elected officials accountable (Pers- not only predicts the contemporaneous effect of compulsory son, Tabellini, & Trebbi, 2003; Besley, 2005; Schaltegger & voting on turnout in elections; it also suggests that compul- Torgler, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • I-Voting – Opportunities and Threats
    DOI : 10.14746/pp.2021.26.1.9 Maciej GÓRNY Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1476-1049 I-voting – opportunities and threats. Conditions for the effective implementation of Internet voting on the example of Switzerland and Estonia Abstract: The aim of the article is to present the opportunities and threats resulting from the implemen- tation of voting via the Internet (i-voting) and to discuss the conditions for effective implementation of this alternative voting procedure on the example of Estonia and Switzerland. Estonia is the only country in the world where i-voting is widely used. In Switzerland, on the other hand, this voting method has been used most often, although its use has been suspended for several years due to legal, infrastructural and political problems. What are the conditions for successfully implementing Internet voting? The attempt to answer this research question was possible thanks to the use of the following research meth- ods: comparative, formal-dogmatic, behavioral and modified historical method. The key conclusion is that the implementation of i-voting must be preceded by many years of political, legal, infrastructural and social activities, and that the created system must be as transparent as possible. Key words: i-voting, electronic voting, Estonia, Switzerland, e-democracy, suffrage Introduction echnological progress and the resulting socio-economic changes mean that a new Ttype of society and democracy are being shaped before our eyes. The development of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), enabling the processing, collec- tion and transmission of information, has led to an information revolution, the result of which is that information is nowadays more valuable than most tangible goods.
    [Show full text]