DOCSLIB.ORG

Station Access Survey Was Conducted in 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CAPITOL CORRIDOR STATION ACCESS STUDY 06/01/2020 CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY Capitol Corridor Station Access Study Intermodal Access Improvements Prepared by Aaron Rubin, Project Coordinator June 2020 1 CAPITOL CORRIDOR STATION ACCESS STUDY 06/01/2020 City Station Owner’s / Partner’s Guide to Using Report Intention of Study The research presented for each Capitol Corridor rail station is intended to be provided to city-owning station partners as suggestions for enhancing multimodal access within the immediate station vicinity and surrounding service areas of each station. These suggestions came from a combination of four main sources: • Capitol Corridor Ridership Observations • Researcher Observations Collected through Site Visits • Researcher Observations Specifically Inspired by Qualitative and Quantitative Feedback from Ridership Survey & Interviews • City Plans (e.g. City Amtrak Station Planning / City & County Bike Plans / Community-Based Transportation Plans) Capitol Corridor recognizes that some cities have conducted their own and more thorough multimodal station access planning studies or community-based transportation plans for areas incorporating Capitol Corridor rail stations. Capitol Corridor defaults to the conclusions of these studies when findings in this report do not directly align, or potentially conflict with, the findings in a city or county’s studies related to multimodal travel planning. Researchers producing this report attempted to read through cities’ publicly available community transportation & active travel planning studies. It is highlighted when a suggestion provided to a city in this report is Capitol Corridor placing its support behind a planning project proposed by a city or county that may directly help encourage improved access by a certain travel mode to a Capitol Corridor train station. Recommendations in this report for each station are not presented in any order of prioritization as to which suggestions may be most important for a city to potentially address. Additionally, there is no defined budget for the implementation of multimodal access projects identified in this study. The next steps thus involve cities identifying the highest performing design change projects and balancing this against the varying costs that improvement projects in this report will entail / how easy a suggestion is to implement. Many projects could be candidates for grant funding, and this may help determine the process for a city selecting certain access projects for implementation. CCJPA encourages local jurisdictions to engage with Capitol Corridor as an active partner in implementing identified access solutions. CAPITOL CORRIDOR STATION ACCESS STUDY 06/01/2020 3 Types of Proposed Multimodal Access Recommendations All station access improvements proposed to city station owners / partners in this report are designed to align with BART/CCJPA station access policy goals. These goals include creating healthier/safer/greener communities, increasing train ridership, improving the customer experience of traveling to/from stations, promoting transportation equity through investing in access choices for all riders, and establishing partnerships with municipalities and connecting transit partners. Station audits were done with a focus on promoting these goals after a station access survey was conducted in 2019. To help cities identify potential access projects to prioritize, projects in this report were labeled with tags ($, #, *) depending on if they were a direct ridership proposal, based on ridership input, solely a research observation resulting from a station site visit, or inspired by an existing city transportation plan. $ Ridership Observation - A ridership observation was a direct comment left by riders either in public comments in the 2019 Capitol Corridor Station Access Survey, in conversations with riders occurring during station site visits, or in the Capitol Corridor Customer Comment Portal. Suggestions labeled in this report as ridership observations are access projects that were specifically detailed in a comment by Capitol Corridor customers – e.g. designing a Class II or Class III bikeway on a specific roadway near a Capitol Corridor station. # Researcher Observation - A researcher observation was the result of field notes collected at all Capitol Corridor stations through multiple audits/station site visits. There was limited to no customer input on these projects – e.g. researcher noticing that a stop sign was removed/stolen and should be reinstalled to improve pedestrian crossing safety at a station. * Rider-Inspired Researcher Observation - A rider-inspired researcher observation involved researchers in this study reading through comments related to station access left in the 2019 Station Access Study or in public comments left in the Capitol Corridor Customer Comment Portal. This feedback was then used during site visits to generate specific ideas for access improvements surrounding each station. Capitol Corridor customers often had good ideas for ways to improve station access for their mode of travel, but did not provide the technical terminology for phrasing a specific access improvement project – e.g. researchers may have turned a customer’s concerns about crossing a busy intersection via bike into a proposal for a bike activated stoplight for crossing over an intersection on a bike boulevard. CAPITOL CORRIDOR STATION ACCESS STUDY 06/01/2020 % City Plan - Publicly available city studies related to the design of Amtrak stations, active travel street design, and community transportation planning were consulted before conducting site visits at each Capitol Corridor station. Once assessing intermodal access conditions surrounding each station and reviewing data provided on access conditions at each station by our ridership, access improvement proposals in this report were labeled as city plans. This label indicates that the CCJPA’s study team agreed that an existing city plan would help significantly reduce barriers to multimodal station access and be strongly supported by our ridership – e.g. a city plan to add Class I bikeways on a road extending into a Capitol Corridor station’s service area may be included as an access improvement proposal and be labeled as a city plan. Data Sources Utilized 1. Amtrak Data: Daily ridership estimates (boardings & alightings) based on 2019 ridership data at the station level provided by Amtrak. 2. Transportation Injury Mapping System: Bicycle and pedestrian collisions within ½ mile or 1 mile of Capitol Corridor stations provided by UC Berkeley TIMS data source. All pedestrian collisions within the years of 2017 and 2018 were included in collision maps (2019 data had not yet been released at the beginning of producing research for this report). 3. Bike Link eLocker Facilities Data: Occupancy of Capitol Corridor bike eLockers (total rentals daily / total lockers at a station) is monitored daily by Bike Link. Occupancy was averaged for all days over the course of 2019 for average occupancy numbers provided in this report. 4. Bikeways Near Stations: Bikeways were digitized using ArcGIS & QGIS programs and were based on most recent bikeway maps provided by cities or counties showing station access areas. 5. 2019 Station Access Survey: Access mode split estimates in this report were generated by combining home & destination mode split data for each station from responses to questions in the 2019 Station Access Survey. Both qualitative data (e.g. rider responses to questions like “What do you like/dislike about your bike ride to the station?”) and quantitative data (e.g. riders providing assessments on a numeric scale for intermodal station access criteria such as the “quality and safety of bikeways extending to the station”) were also incorporated from this survey to gather the data necessary to design access improvement proposals based on ridership comments/input. 6. Capitol Corridor Customer Comment Portal: Customer comments left in the Capitol Corridor Customer Comment Portal were read through to find ridership input related specifically to station access or station design. These observations were then used to design intermodal access improvement proposals based on ridership input. CAPITOL CORRIDOR STATION ACCESS STUDY 06/01/2020 Study Funding The Capitol Corridor Station Access Study was produced through a fellowship partnership between Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority and Strategic Energy Innovations. The motivation for producing this report involved matching Strategic Energy Innovations’ goals of working with public sector partners to design alternative/clean transportation initiatives that reduce overall GHG emissions with Capitol Corridor’s goals to improve Californian communities by enabling riders to get to and from stations safely, comfortably, affordably, & cost-effectively. About the Author Aaron Rubin served as a Project Coordinator at Capitol Corridor and a Fellow at Strategic Energy Innovations from September 2019 to June 2020. He currently resides in Portland, Maine, and is a 2019 graduate of Bowdoin College with a degree in Environmental Studies / Government & Legal Studies. Aaron is passionate about work in public service and civic innovation, with specific interests in doing community-based research and analytical work to inform decisions made in the renewable energy and transportation sectors. To reach out with inquiries or comments related to the contents of this report, please reach Aaron at the email address provided
Recommended publications
  • West Contra Costa County High Capacity Transit

    West Contra Costa County High Capacity Transit

    El Cerrito February 28, 2017 Hercules El Cerrito City Councilmembers El Sobrante Municipal Advisory Councilmembers Hercules City Councilmembers Pinole City Councilmembers Pinole Richmond City Councilmembers San Pablo City Councilmembers Richmond RE: West County High Capacity Transit Study Update and Presentation Dear Councimembers: Thank you for the opportunity to share with you West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory San Pablo Committee’s progress on its West County High Capacity Transit Study. The study is nearing completion and we are seeking stakeholder and public opinion on the initial draft findings from the study. Your staff have invited us to give presentations to your Councils on the West County High Capacity Transit Study’s highlights and gather community feedback. Contra Costa County BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION In the spring of 2015, WCCTAC launched its West County High Capacity Transit Study. A team of transportation consultants working with the WCCTAC Board and its Technical Advisory Committee and staff developed study goals and objectives and evaluated existing and future AC Transit transportation networks, land uses, and travel markets. The study’s consultants analyzed this information then developed an initial set of alternatives that then underwent a technical evaluation that considered travel time improvements, access to regional transit centers, transit market potential, service to low-income areas and markets lacking major transit connections, etc. BART Throughout this study process, community outreach efforts have been on-going. A study- dedicated website (www.WestCountyTransitStudy.com) provides the public with opportunities to check on the study’s status and review presentations and technical memos. In November 2015, WCCTAC and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) held a joint telephone town hall, which attracted 2,045 total attendees, with 700 callers at its peak and an average of 150 WestCAT 6333 Potrero Avenue, Suite 100, El Cerrito CA 94530 Phone: 510.210.5930 ~ www.wcctac.org attendees over sixty minutes.
  • Transportation to the Claremont

    Transportation to the Claremont

    General Transportation Information Both San Francisco and Oakland International Airport service the Claremont Hotel. With attendees arriving from all over the U.S. and internationally, we are fortunate to be just 14 miles from Oakland International Airport. San Francisco International is 24 miles away. Driving directions from OAK International Please allow ½ hour drive time. Travel times vary depending on traffic http://goo.gl/maps/qPQBy Driving direction from SFO http://goo.gl/maps/xtAav Please allow 1 hour drive time from San Francisco airport. Travel times vary depending on traffic. GROUND TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS In order to meet your transportation needs, we can offer the following options. We feel these options will be best adaptable to your schedule and will result in less time spent waiting for transportation at both the airport and the resort. The following costs are approximate and may be subject to change. To/From Oakland International Airport A. Bayporter Shuttle - (415)769-4063 $29.00 for the first passenger $10.00 for the next. 4 am-9 pm. 7 passenger charters, $90.00 A $3 cash deposit per person applies on the return. B. Taxi companies on standby, $45-$60 dollars depending on traffic, excluding gratuity C. COIT Transportation: Town car, all inclusive $90.35 curbside pickup, $20 dollars more for inside meet. SUV available for 7 persons. $125.35 To/From San Francisco International airport A. Bayporter Shuttle - 415-769-4063 $38.00 for the first passenger $10.00 for the next. Hrs. Approximately 4 am-9 pm. A 7 person charter $95 with a 3 dollar cash deposit per person B.
  • The Third Crossing

    The Third Crossing

    The Third Crossing A Megaproject in a Megaregion www.thirdcrossing.org Final Report, February 2017 Transportation Planning Studio Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the College of Environmental Design (CED) at UC Berkeley, the University of California Transportation Center and Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS), UC Berkeley for support. A special thanks also goes to the helpful feedback from studio instructor Karen Trapenberg Frick and UC Berkeley faculty and researchers including Jesus Barajas and Jason Corburn. We also acknowledge the tremendous support and insights from colleagues at numerous public agencies and non-profit organizations throughout California. A very special thanks goes to David Ory, Michael Reilly, and Fletcher Foti of MTC for their gracious support in running regional travel and land use models, and to Professor Paul Waddell and Sam Blanchard of UrbanSim, Inc. for lending their resources and expertise in land use modeling. We also thank our classmates Joseph Poirier and Lee Reis; as well as David Eifler, Teresa Caldeira, Jennifer Wolch, Robert Cervero, Elizabeth Deakin, Malla Hadley, Leslie Huang and other colleagues at CED; and, Alexandre Bayen, Laura Melendy and Jeanne Marie Acceturo of ITS Berkeley. About Us We are a team of 15 graduate students in City Planning, Transportation Engineering, and Public Health. This project aims to facilitate a conversation about the future of transportation between the East Bay and San Francisco and in the larger Northern California megaregion. We are part of the Department of City and Regional Planning in the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design, with support from the University of California Transportation Center and The Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
  • ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route

    ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route

    ACE train time schedule & line map San Jose View In Website Mode The ACE train line (San Jose) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Jose: 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM (2) Stockton: 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ACE train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ACE train arriving. Direction: San Jose ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops San Jose Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Stockton Station 949 Channel St, Stockton Tuesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Lathrop/Manteca Station Wednesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Tracy Station Thursday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Friday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Vasco Road Station South Vasco Road, Livermore Saturday Not Operational Livermore Station Pleasanton Station 403 Old Bernal Av, Pleasanton ACE train Info Direction: San Jose Fremont Station Stops: 10 37275 Fremont Bl, Fremont Trip Duration: 132 min Line Summary: Stockton Station, Lathrop/Manteca Great America Station Station, Tracy Station, Vasco Road Station, West Tasman Drive, Santa Clara Livermore Station, Pleasanton Station, Fremont Station, Great America Station, Santa Clara Station, Santa Clara Station San Jose Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara San Jose Station Direction: Stockton ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops Stockton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM San Jose Station Tuesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Santa Clara Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara Wednesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Great America Station Thursday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor

    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor

    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
  • ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7

    ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7

    Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit
  • Perseverance & Progress Work Program and Budget

    Perseverance & Progress Work Program and Budget

    2020/2021 Work Program and Budget Perseverance & Progress Built on solid ground, SJRRC will continue through this unprecedented crisis with vision and momentum. ® Table of Contents ® Executive Summary............................3 SJJPA..............................................11 ® Planning.............................................4 Organizational Chart.........................13 Operations.........................................6 Capital Budget.................................14 Stockton Diamond..............................8 ACE Operating Budget.....................15 Capital Projects..................................9 SJJPA Operating Budget .................16 The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board of Directors Christina Fugazi Debby Moorhead Scott Haggerty Chair, City of Stockton Commissioner, City of Manteca Commissioner, Alameda County Leo Zuber Nancy Young John Marchand Vice Chair, City of Ripon Commissioner, City of Tracy Commissioner, City of Livermore Bob Elliott Doug Kuehne Commissioner, San Joaquin County Commissioner, City of Lodi Stacey Mortensen Executive Director 2020/2021 Work Program and Budget 2 Executive Summary The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission is built on a ing forward and provides much needed jobs for many private solid foundation of political leadership, staff commitment planners, engineers, architects, and construction contractors. and adaptability. The difficult years of the 1998 ACE start- The Valley Rail Program will continue to press forward in the up, the 2003 dot.com implosion, and the 2009 full recession coming year with multiple environmental processes to keep have prepared the agency to deal with the unknowns of the the entire Program on-track and set to deliver transforma- coming year. Staff is prepared to work with less, cover extra tional service expansion for both ACE and the San Joaquins. workload and find ways to leverage and share resources with Also, included in the Capital Program are key passenger other partners.
  • SBC Executivesummfac

    SBC Executivesummfac

    CAPITOL CORRIDOR SOUTH BAY CONNECT AUGUST 2020 Purpose Study Area and Project Elements South Bay Connect proposes to relocate the Capitol Corridor passenger rail service between the Oakland N Coliseum and Newark from the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) Niles Subdivision to the Coast Subdivision for a faster, more direct route. It will also create new transbay connections for passengers between the East Bay and Peninsula by connecting to bus and shuttle services at the Ardenwood Station. The project is not proposing an increase in Capitol Corridor service frequency or changes to UP’s freight service, but does not preclude service growth in the future. The relocation will facilitate the separation of passenger and freight rail, resulting in improved rail operations, efficiency, and reliability while minimizing rail congestion within the corridor. Proposed New Station and Railroad Potential Station Area Proposed Capitol Corridor (CC) Service Potential Station Considered and Eliminated Existing CC Service Existing Station CC Service to be Discontinued Station where CC Service Study Area to be Discontinued UP Improvement Area BART Station Benefits Reduce passenger rail travel time between Oakland and San Jose and throughout the larger megaregion to increase ridership on transit, ease congestion on the Bay Area’s stressed roadways, and decrease auto commutes. Diversify and enhance network integration by reducing duplicative capital investments and dif- ferentiating Capitol Corridor’s intercity rail service from commuter rail and other transit services, including BART’s extension to San Jose. Support economic vitality by permitting enhanced rail movement and the preservation of freight rail capacity in the Northern California market through the reduction of existing conflicts between freight rail operations and passenger rail service.
  • West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan

    West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan

    FINAL WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN and WEST CONTRA COSTA/ALBANY TRANSIT WAYFINDING PLAN Prepared for: West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee October 2011 Acknowledgements WCCTAC BOARD City of El Cerrito Janet Abelson, Vice Chair City of Hercules Donald Kuehne City of Pinole Roy Swearingen, Chair City of Richmond Courtland “Corky” Boozé City of Richmond Thomas Butt City of Richmond Jeff Ritterman City of San Pablo Genoveva Calloway AC Transit Joe Wallace BART Joel Keller WestCAT Tom Hansen Contra Costa County John Gioia WCCTAC STAFF Christina Atienza, Executive Director Linda Young John Rudolph Joanna Pollock WCCTAC WORKING GROUP City of El Cerrito Yvetteh Ortiz City of Hercules Robert Reber City of Pinole Winston Rhodes City of Richmond Chad Smalley, Hector Rojas, Steven Tam City of San Pablo Kanwal Sandhu, Adele Ho AC Transit Nathan Landau, Puja Sarna, Aaron Priven BART Diedre Heitman WestCAT Rob Thompson Contra Costa County Jamar Stamps MTC Jay Stagi CONSULTANT TEAM Fehr & Peers Nelson/Nygaard Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Linda Rhine Brooke DuBose (Deputy PM) Joey Goldman Matthew Ridgway Meghan Mitman Studio L’Image Ellen Poling Sue Labouvie Josh Peterman Max Heim Steve Rhyne Carrie Carsell Eisen Letunic Nikki Hervol Niko Letunic Nikki Foletta table of contents I Introduction II Study Locations III Community Participation IV Travel Demand Management & Parking Strategies V Richmond BART Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VI Richmond Parkway Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VII El Cerrito Del
  • Mcconaghy House Teacher Packet Contains Historical Information About the Mcconaghy Family, Surrounding Region, and American Lifestyle

    Mcconaghy House Teacher Packet Contains Historical Information About the Mcconaghy Family, Surrounding Region, and American Lifestyle

    1 WELCOME TO THE McCONAGHY HOUSE! Visiting the McConaghy House is an exciting field trip for students and teachers alike. Docent-led school tours of the house focus on local history, continuity and change, and the impact of individuals in our community. The house allows students to step into the past and experience and wonder about the life of a farming family. The McConaghy House is also an example of civic engagement as the community mobilized in the 1970’s to save the house from pending demolition. Through the efforts of concerned citizens, an important part of our local history has been pre- served for future generations to enjoy. The McConaghy House Teacher Packet contains historical information about the McConaghy family, surrounding region, and American lifestyle. Included are pre and post visit lesson plans, together with all necessary resources and background information. These lessons are not required for a guided visit but will greatly enrich the experience for students. The lessons can be completed in any order, though recommendations have been made for ease of implementation. We welcome comments and suggestions about the usefulness of this packet in your classroom. An evaluation form is enclosed for your feedback. Thank you for booking a field trip to the McConaghy House. We look forward to seeing you and your students! Sincerely, Education Department 22380 Foothill Blvd Hayward, CA 94541 510-581-0223 www.haywardareahistory.org 2 Table of Contents Teacher Information The Hayward Area Historical Society .................................................................................... 4 Why do we study history? How does a museum work? ....................................................... 5 History of the McConaghy Family for Teachers ...................................................................
  • Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors Will Be Held at 9:00 A.M

    Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors Will Be Held at 9:00 A.M

    BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ REGULAR MEETING March 3, 2004 A meeting of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors will be held at 9:00 a.m. at the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District’s (BART) Lake Merritt Headquarters, located at 800 Madison in the First Floor Board Room, Oakland, California. Questions About an Agenda Item The name, telephone number and e-mail of the appropriate staff person to contact for additional information or to resolve concerns is listed for each agenda item. Meeting Procedures The public meeting of the Air District Board of Directors begins at 9:00 a.m. The Board of Directors generally will consider items in the order listed on the agenda. However, any item may be considered in any order. After action on any agenda item not requiring a public hearing, the Board may reconsider or amend the item at any time during the meeting. Telegraph San Pablo To I-580 To I-580 18th 17th Lake 17th Merritt 16th 15th 15th 980 14th Lakeside 13th 12th P 11th 10th 9th Martin Luther King, Jr. Way Castro 8th 7th 6th To San Francisco880 To San José 5th 4th Oak Clay I-880 freeway Alice Franklin Jackson Webster Harrison to Bay Bridge 3rd Madison Jefferson and Broadway San Francisco 2nd Washington C.L. Dellums (Oakland) Amtrak Station Embarcadero N Oakland Inner Harbor Berkeley Amtrak Station Public Transit Access 80 (Emeryville) 24 BART: Lake Merritt Station on the Fremont Line 580 13 AC Transit: Lines 59, 59A, 62 (weekends) San Francisco Bay Bridge 880 Oakland Lines 11, 59, 59A, 62, 35X, 36X (weekdays) 980 Amtrak: C.L.