Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar Association House of Delegates Meeting, 1959 Joseph C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar Association House of Delegates Meeting, 1959 Joseph C Nebraska Law Review Volume 39 | Issue 1 Article 2 1960 Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar Association House of Delegates Meeting, 1959 Joseph C. Tye Nebraska State Bar Association Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Joseph C. Tye, Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar Association House of Delegates Meeting, 1959, 39 Neb. L. Rev. 1 (1960) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol39/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. PRESIDENT JOSEPH C. TYE 1959 OFFICERS OF THE NEBRASKA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION President JOSEPH C. TYE Kearney Chairman of the House of Delegates RICHARD E. HUNTER Hastings Secretary-Treasurer GEORGE H. TuRNER Lincoln EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Joseph C. Tye ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kearney Paul H. Bek ....................---------------------------------------------------------------------- Seward Thomas F. Colfer .................................----------------------------....--------- McCook Alfred G. Ellick ----------------------...........................------------------------ - ------- Om aha John R. Fike ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Omaha Clarence E. Haley ------------------------------------------------------------------------Hartington Carl G. Humphrey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mullen Richard E. Hunter ............................................................................H astings William H. Lamme -------------------------------------------------------------------------Fremont Paul L. M artin --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sidney C. Russell M attson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Lincoln Harry A. Spencer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Lincoln HOUSE OF DELEGATES EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS Richard E. Hunter --------------------------------------------------------------...........Hastings Joseph C. Tye _.-.......................---------------------------------------------------------Kearney Paul H. Bek ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Seward Thomas F. Colfer -------------------------------------------------------------------------- McCook Alfred G. Ellick ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Omaha John R. Fike ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Om aha Clarence E.Haley ........................................................................Hartington Carl G. Humphrey ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mullen William H. Lamme ........................................................................ Fremont Paul L. Martin------............................................................................. Sidney C. Russell Mattson ............................................................................ Lincoln Harry A. Spencer .............................................................................. Lincoln SECTION DELEGATES John C. Mason .................................................................................... Lincoln Fred H. Richards ............................................................................ Fremont A. J. Luebs ............................. Grand Isan...............................................Island Anne Pickett Carstens ............................... .................-------------------- Beatrice David Dow ..........................................................................................Lincoln Edward A. Cook, III .................................................................... Lexington EX-OFFICIO MEMBER John J. Wilson .................................................................................. Lincoln ELECTED DELEGATES FIRST DISTRICT Robert S. Finn ...................................................................... Tecumseh SECOND DISTRICT Bernard M. Spencer .................................................... Nebraska City THIRD DISTRICT James N. Ackerman ---------...................................................... Lincoln Chauncey E. Barney ................................................................ Lincoln Herman Ginsburg ..................................................................... Lincoln C. M. Pierson ................................ L.............................................Lincoln FOURTH DISTRICT Milton R. Abrahams .................................................................. Omaha Robert K. Adams ........................................................................ Omaha R. M. Crossman, Jr .-................................................................... Omaha Oscar T. Doerr ............................................................................ Omaha Margaret Fischer .................... O...................................................Omaha James F. Green ............................................................................ Omaha Edson Smith ......... ...................................................................... Omaha Ralph Svoboda ............................................................................ Omaha Joseph J. Vinardi .........................................-............................... Omaha FIFTH DISTRICT Phil B. Campbell ...................................................................... Osceola Maynard Grosshans ........................................................................ York SIXTH DISTRICT William H. Lamme ------------------------------------------------------------Fremont L. F. Otradovsky ---------------------------------------------------------------Schuyler SEVENTH DISTRICT Robert H. Downing ............................................................... Superior EIGHTH DISTRICT M ark J. Ryan ................................................................ So. Sioux City NINTH DISTRICT Eugene M cFadden .................................................................... Norfolk P. M . M oodie ........................................................................ W est Point TENTH DISTRICT Howard S. Foe ..............-------------------------------------------------------- Red Cloud L. R. Stiner ................---------------------------------------------------------------- Hastings ELEVENTH DISTRICT Kenneth H. Elson ................................ ..------------------------Grand Island E. L. V ogeltanz ................................................................................. Ord TWELFTH DISTRICT Ward W . M inor ........................................................................ Kearney THIRTEENTH DISTRICT John J. Pow ers .......................................................................... Ogallala Bernard B. Smith ................................................................ Lexington FOURTEENTH DISTRICT Daniel Owens --------............................................................. Benkelman FIFTEENTH DISTRICT William L. Brennan ----------------------------------------------------------------------Butte SIXTEENTH DISTRICT W. E. Mumby ..................................................-------------- ------------ Harrison SEVENTEENTH DISTRICT Robert J. Bulger .................................................................. Bridgeport EIGHTEENTH DISTRICT Dean R. Sackett ------------------------------------------------------------------------Beatrice NEBRASKA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF DELEGATES The first session of the House of Delegates of the Nebraska State Bar Association convening in the Ballroom of the Hotel Paxton, Omaha, Nebraska, was called to order at 9:45 o'clock by Chairman Richard E. Hunter of Hastings, Nebraska. CHAIRMAN HUNTER: The 1959 session of the House of Delegates of the Nebraska State Bar Association will please come to order. Mr. Secretary, will you read the roll. (Roll call by the Secretary.) SECRETARY TURNER: There is a quorum present, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN HUNTER: At this time we have the report of the President of the Nebraska State Bar Association, Mr. Joseph C. Tye. REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT Joseph C. Tye Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen of the House of Delegates: I don't know just why this report is called for at this time by the President, since he is required to make a report tomorrow and I assume that most of you gentlemen will be present at that time, but I will make a very short statement about two or three things that seem to me to be of importance to all of us at this time. Generally, permit me to say that the committee and the sections this year have been most accommodating and helpful. They have been hard-working, active groups, and I will have something further to say about that tomorrow. I wonder if the House of Delegates or a committee appointed for such purpose might give some study to the composition of the sections. I have noticed this year particularly the Insurance Section, and because I have attended the Insurance Section pre- viously, it seems now to be dealing principally with automobile law, if not wholly so, as the section conducts its meetings here at
Recommended publications
  • Case Management System Migration for the 4Th Judicial District of Nebraska
    al Center forSc State Courts Case Management System Migration for the 4th Judicial District of Nebraska Larry Webster, Project Director John Matthias, Project Consultant Daniel J. Hall, Vice President Court Consulting Services National Center for State Courts 707 17th Street, Suite 2900 Denver, CO 80202 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background 2 III. Case Management Systems and Business Process Assessment 4 A. Methodology 4 B. Business Processes Reviewed 4 C. Business Processes Affected by JUSTICE Transition 7 1) Changes that May Eliminate Work and Improve Business Processes 8 2) Process Issues that Will Require Changes to JUSTICE 9 3) Required Business Process Changes 12 4) Additional Changes that Should Be Considered 14 D. General Principles 15 1) One-Stop Customer Service 15 2) Immediate Availability of Digital Documents 16 3) Recording Courtroom Activity 16 4) Integrated Justice 16 5) Eliminate Unnecessary Parallel Indexing and Recordkeeping Systems 16 6) Eliminate Disparity of Practice 16 IV. District Court Clerk Organizational Changes 18 V. Electronic Document Management Analysis 22 A. General Principles 22 B. Content Manager 22 C. Project Gabe 23 D. JUSTICE EDMS 23 E. E-filing with JUSTICE 23 VI. Court Policy Environment 24 A. Rule 4-2 Pleadings 25 B. Rule 4-2 Computer Database 25 C. Rule 4-4 Criminal Cases 25 D. Rule 4-6 Dismissals and Settlements 25 E. Rule 4-10 Case Progression 26 F. Rule 4-12 Assignment of Cases 26 G. Rule 4-17 Garnishments 26 VII. Public Access to Court Records 28 VIII. Integration Analysis 29 A. Introduction 29 B. Current CJIS Functions and Interfaces to Be Retained 1) Criminal Complaint 30 2) Prisoner Transport 33 3) Juvenile Court Out-of-Home Placements Oracle Batch Payment 34 4) Attorney Fees Weekly Oracle Batch Payment 35 5) Monthly Ledgers Microfiche 37 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Section I Leadership
    Dakota County Juvenile Services Comprehensive Community Plan 2015 – 2018 Dakota County Juvenile Services Comprehensive Community Plan July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2018 SECTION I LEADERSHIP Prepared By: Sarah Deck Dakota County Juvenile Diversion 1601 Broadway P.O. Box 117 Dakota City, NE 68731 [email protected] Chair of Team: Michael Carlson Reporting Center Coordinator, Dist. 6 Probation State of Nebraska 1000 W. 29th Street, Suite 118 South Sioux City, NE 68776 [email protected] Board Chair: Antonio Gomez Dakota County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 165 Jackson, NE 68743 [email protected] Page 1 Dakota County Juvenile Services Comprehensive Community Plan 2015 – 2018 SECTION II COMMUNITY TEAM Page 2 Dakota County Juvenile Services Comprehensive Community Plan 2015 – 2018 The Dakota County Juvenile Services Comprehensive Plan Team was organized in 2006 with guidance from Mark Martin, a criminal justice consultant. The team has been meeting quarterly since that time. During each team meeting, the team reviews the plan and discusses the progress of each strategy. New ideas or topics are also discussed amongst the team members. The team consists of representatives from various agencies in the county that work directly with juveniles and representatives from the business community. The members represent the county’s School Districts, Law Enforcement, Health and Human Services, Probation, County Attorney, Diversion, County Board, and community stakeholders. Michael Carlson was assigned the position of chairperson by former Project Director, Robert Denton, in 2012. Mr. Carlson assumed the responsibility of organizing and facilitating the meetings until March of 2015 when Sarah Deck, Diversion Coordinator, assumed these duties.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 URMIA Journal
    URMIA Journal 2007–08 Denver UNIVERSITY RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE ASSOCIATION 5692 Cover_NoSpine.indd 1 12/17/2010 4:05:49 PM The mountains they are silent folk They stand afar—alone, And the clouds that kiss their brows at night Hear neither sigh nor groan. Each bears him in his ordered place As soldiers do, and bold and high They fold their forests round their feet And bolster up the sky. —HAMLIN GARLAND (1860–1940), “THE MOUNTAINS ARE A LONELY FOLK” Front cover: Rocky Mountains, Colorado Denver: host city for the 2007 URMIA Conference. 5692 Cover_NoSpine.indd 2 12/17/2010 4:06:27 PM URMIAURMIA JournalJournal 2007–08 University Risk Management and Insurance Association OFFICERS President Ellen M. Shew Holland, ARM University of Denver (303) 871-2327 [email protected] President-Elect Vincent E. Morris, CPCU, ARM, AIC, CRM, CIC Wheaton College (630) 752-5013 [email protected] Secretary Anita C. Ingram, MBA, ARM Southern Methodist University (214) 768-4047 [email protected] Treasurer Margaret Tungseth, CPA, MBA Concordia College (218) 299-3327 [email protected] Downtown Denver, Colorado Parliamentarian Photo credit: Denver Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau Gary W. Langsdale, ARM Pennsylvania State University (814) 865-6308 [email protected] Immediate Past President Allen J. Bova, MBA, ARM, DRM Cornell University (607) 277-1188 [email protected] DIRECTORS Julie C. Baecker, AIC, ARM (’10) University of Alaska (907) 450-8153 [email protected] Mary Breighner, CPCU, DRM (’09) FM Global (513) 742-9516 [email protected] Steve Bryant, CRM, ARM (’09) Texas Tech University System (806) 742-0212 [email protected] Mary Dewey, ARM, CIC, CPCU, DRM (’08) University of Vermont (802) 656-8453 [email protected] Jill Laster, ARM, DRM (’08) Texas Christian University (817) 257-6798 [email protected] Marjorie F.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmasking the Teen Cyberbully: a First Amendment-Compliant Approach to Protecting Child Victims of Anonymous, School-Related Internet Harassment Benjamin A
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals November 2017 Unmasking the Teen Cyberbully: A First Amendment-Compliant Approach to Protecting Child Victims of Anonymous, School-Related Internet Harassment Benjamin A. Holden Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, and the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation Holden, Benjamin A. (2017) "Unmasking the Teen Cyberbully: A First Amendment-Compliant Approach to Protecting Child Victims of Anonymous, School-Related Internet Harassment," Akron Law Review: Vol. 51 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol51/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Holden: Unmasking the Teen Cyberbully UNMASKING THE TEEN CYBERBULLY: A FIRST AMENDMENT-COMPLIANT APPROACH TO PROTECTING CHILD VICTIMS OF ANONYMOUS, SCHOOL-RELATED INTERNET HARASSMENT By: Benjamin A. Holden* I. Introduction and Overview ............................................ 2 II. Minors and The First Amendment ................................. 9 A. The First Amendment and Minors Generally ....... 10 B. The First Amendment and The Student Speech Cases ..................................................................... 10 C. The First Amendment and The Child Protection Cases ..................................................................... 12 1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 'COURTS ~, .;\!L I =J
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ----~ ---- ------~------- ( 1Y; dJ ~ ->. ._,,__ k.,, __, .• .:.::::-.:.....-:_ .. -."'"" __ -.-----. _-..-.___ t-;.:::"'~'--'---·~'·~"·'''-·'·''';-·-'-''''··-'''-''''·' '~-~'~'---'''--''''7'' .• ,~,."~==.-.,.-.~~---......,:----.~,,,.~.--·--.... '7'~·-~~ .. -'-~ ...... ~-'---~ ........... ~~-....... ~~-.:.~~~'1 ~>-"~ _..".,,~ v~_..,~ ..,.,~ ~~._.~_'.~_~~,,,_~,~,_~.~"~~,_.~~ .~-:1 it t ',: .' , National Criminal Justice Reference Service THE 'COURTS ~, .;\!l i =j . I • 1 I y I ( I OF NEBRASKA ,':; Thiz microfiche was produced fcom documents received for I inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, I' the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on i this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. i \ Q i,. 1.0 ~ 1111/2,8 III"~ ug ~F2 2,2 Il£i r.:. ~3,6 w J:.I 0,,=4,0 1.:1. - r.:. " 1.1 gULl. IIIII:~ .25 11111.1.4 lllll1.6 , n MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A [I a ·1 'l Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. ,', Points of view or opinions stated in this document are A those of the author(s) and do not represent the official i Report on 'I~~eir Structure and Operation , . position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. 1980 National Institute of Justice 10/12/82 United States Department of Justicle Washington, D. C. 20531 , ", I , ! -------...,,-..,.........,.,.........,....---.=-- -~ ---- ---- - ~------ \ " ·.11 • THE COURTS OF NEBRASKA 1980 A Report on Tkeir Structure and Operation Prepared by the Office of the State Court Administrator CONTENTS U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Status: a Determinant of Perceptions and Responses to Bullying
    Socio-Economic Status: A Determinant of Perceptions and Responses to Bullying A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School Of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Education, Criminal Justice and Social Work by Kelli M. Jette M.Ed. Xavier University June 2007 Committee Chair: Marvin Berlowitz, Ph.D Dissertation Bullying ii Abstract Bullying has been examined by a variety of international professionals, all intent upon stopping this unmanageable problem in the school setting. Many experts have designed and implemented strategic whole-group, anti-bullying campaigns that are purchased by school administrators in the attempt that bullying will be thwarted by a one-size-fits-all “fix” of the pervasive and troublesome behaviors. Bullying continues to impede the efforts of school officials, regardless of the program by which they are educating students. The reason? There are no anti-bullying campaigns that adequately address the dynamics of class, race, and gender. These factors act as a catalyst for different manifestations in the definition of bullying, the perceptions of bullying, and the reactions of teachers and staff towards bullying situations. These factors also account for the differences in behavioral manifestations among students. Race, class, and gender are major determinants of “how” and “why” and “what” perpetrators and victims experience when faced with a bullying incident. Therefore, it is necessary to understand these complex dynamics
    [Show full text]
  • BENJAMIN M. V. JERI S. Cite As 307 Neb
    Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/10/2020 09:01 AM CST - 733 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 307 Nebraska Reports BENJAMIN M. v. JERI S. Cite as 307 Neb. 733 Benjamin M., appellant, v. Jeri S., appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed November 6, 2020. No. S-19-1144. 1. Motions to Dismiss: Rules of the Supreme Court: Pleadings: Appeal and Error. A district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Neb. Ct. R. of Pldg. § 6-1112(b)(6) is reviewed de novo, accepting all the allegations in the complaint as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party. 2. Statutes: Appeal and Error. Statutory interpretation presents a ques- tion of law. On a question of law, an appellate court is obligated to reach a conclusion independent of the determination reached by the court below. 3. Jurisdiction: Words and Phrases. Subject matter jurisdiction is the power of a tribunal to hear and determine a case in the general class or category to which the proceedings in question belong and to deal with the general subject matter involved. 4. Courts: Jurisdiction: Paternity. District courts have subject matter jurisdiction of actions to determine paternity of a child. 5. Limitations of Actions: Pleadings. A challenge that a pleading is barred by the statute of limitations is a challenge that the pleading fails to allege sufficient facts to constitute a claim upon which relief can be granted. 6. Limitations of Actions: Pleadings: Waiver.
    [Show full text]
  • Penalty for Cyber Bullying in California
    Penalty For Cyber Bullying In California insufferablyWhen Parsifal after permutate Keil goffer his palatably, entrenchment quite toweledunlatched. not Orpheanluculently Brodie enough, sometimes is Alaa enuretic? keratinizing Brainy his planimetryGuthry terrace vexingly no lepidopterology and alter so needily! brown-nose Prior record in turn for handling all remaining states havespecific provisions for cyber harassment; minnesota house bill no requirement. Maryland creates a part is potentially serious threats from the penalty for cyber bullying in california and the dissemination of bullying prevention and feha, experiences and accessibility of justice system for. Leavetheschools a cyber bullies are you use in california law specifically cyberbullying to nearly all incidents. The california and santos, teachers should not harass. What they are more useful for bullying for cyber bullying prevention programs are more expansive legislation and email in. Far more specifically for help police department also extends to provide. These model policies and veteran military service to create an insurmountable task force has recently cyberbullying in the common model policy related context or. Many have an electronic conduct was sexually abused by request form directly on cyber bullying for receiving bullying and administrators. Includes communications in california for their own. Keep a penalty of whom the penalty for cyber bullying in california? For information in british academy, electronic device or repeated instances of the requirements concerning the penalty for cyber bullying in california law offices of the cell phone. In Iowa a law mandates that schools create anti-cyberbullying policies for incidents. You really has been developed for a connection between policies and violence policy development and legally permissible as massachusetts does it has excelled and all relevant school penalty for cyber bullying in california was very careful how behavior intended or.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROLE of NOSTALGIA in a DETACHED COMMUNITY Martin
    A PLACE APART: THE ROLE OF NOSTALGIA IN A DETACHED COMMUNITY Martin Otto Zimmann A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2011 Committee: Dr. Scott C. Martin, Advisor Dr. Ruben V. Anguiano Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Kristine Blair Dr. Ellen Berry Dr. Duane Larson ii ABSTRACT Dr. Scott C. Martin, Advisor This work investigated the power of nostalgia in perpetuating rituals and folkways in detached communities. The focus of this study was Camp Luther, a family camp operated under the auspices of Lutheran Outdoor Ministries. Over the summer of 2010, approximately sixty interviews were conducted at the camp, and qualitative data from these interviews was used to formulate ideas and theoretical underpinnings for a concept the author calls “the nostalgic reflex.” These interviews were transcribed and then coded to indicate the manner in which nostalgia was driving the thought processes of the interview subjects. Quotations from the interviews were used throughout the document to support the theory of the nostalgic reflex. The interview data was rich with language and notions that indicated the level to which adherents of the camp were “under the influence” of the nostalgic reflex insofar as their devotion to the ethos of the camp’s character was concerned. One of the most interesting data points was people’s willingness to raise a large sum of money to preserve the lakefront of the camp, giving credence to the theory of “solastalgia” as coined by Glenn Albrecht. The language of the interview subjects also dovetailed neatly into Diane Barthel’s tenets of the Staged Symbolic Community.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Education and Bar Admissions: a History of the Nebraska Experience Stephen E
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 55 | Issue 4 Article 5 1976 Legal Education and Bar Admissions: A History of the Nebraska Experience Stephen E. Kalish University of Nebraska College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Stephen E. Kalish, Legal Education and Bar Admissions: A History of the Nebraska Experience, 55 Neb. L. Rev. 596 (1976) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol55/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. By Stephen E. Kalish* Legal Education and Bar Admissions: A History of the Nebraska Experience ARTICLE OUTLINE I. INTRODUCTION II. 1854-1867. DECENTRALIZED ACCESS AND MINIMUM EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS III. 1867-1893. DISSATISFACTION WITH DECENTRALIZATION AND WITH LAW OFFICE TRAINING IV. 1893-1910. CENTRALIZED ACCESS AND LAW SCHOOL LEGITIMIZATION V. 1910-1933. DISSATISFACTION WITH LEGISLATIVE STANDARDS; THE LAW SCHOOLS SEEK PRIMACY VI. 1933-1941. THE JUDICIARY SECURES CONTROL; THE FULL-TIME LAW SCHOOLS GAIN PRIMACY VII. 1941-1950. A CODA VIII. CONCLUSION I. INTRODUCTION For the last quarter of a century, a Nebraska bar candidate has been eligible to practice in the state if he or she graduated from a three year full-time or a four year part-time law school approved by the Council on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar of the American Bar Association, attended at least three years of college before law school, and passed a bar examination administered by a supreme court appointed bar commission.' If the candidate was a licensed practitioner in another jurisdiction, he or she would be eligible for admission in Nebraska if the other jurisdiction had requirements equal to Nebraska's or if he or she had practiced law for five of the ten years before application.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Session the 2019
    THE IOWA L AW Y ER February 2019 V 79 N 1 Merit Selection: The 2019 We need your help PAGE 5 Legislative Chief Justice outlines new Session court initiatives PAGE 14 ISBA begins lobbying efforts ALSO THIS ISSUE IN on key issues and bills: Mediation in How YOU can get involved bankruptcy court PAGE 7 PAGE 16 Don’t Tell A Soul. At McKee, Voorhees & Sease, attorneys understand that well-kept trade secrets are critical to business success. Keeping business strategies and confidential information protected is our number one priority in order to help businesses grow. We take pride in helping our clients protect and utilize their trade secrets, including licensing, contracts, nondisclosure agreements, and employee policies and procedures. Our attorneys have over 40 years of experience litigating and protecting trade secret rights. If your client has a potential trade secret matter, call today at (515) 288-3667 and ask to speak with Scott Johnson or Christine Lebrón-Dykeman. Your Worldwide IP Partner Since 1924™ PATENTS • TRADEMARKS • COPYRIGHTS • REGULATORY LAW TRADE SECRETS • ENTERTAINMENT LAW • LICENSING • LITIGATION IALawyerPrintAd_February 2019 (trade secrets).indd 1 1/11/2019 11:46:19 AM The official publication of The Iowa State Bar Association. EDITORIAL TEAM Volume 79 Editor-in-Chief Contributing Editor Number 1 Melissa Higgins Virginia Sipes, J.D. February 2019 515-697-7896 515-697-7897 [email protected] [email protected] Copy Editor General Inquiries Steve Boeckman CONTENTS 515-243-3179 515-697-7869 [email protected] [email protected] THE IOWA LAWYER (ISSN 1052-5327) is published monthly except for the combined December-January issue, by The Iowa State Bar Association, 625 East Court Ave., Des Moines, IA 50309-1904.
    [Show full text]
  • [LB13 LB15 LB347 LB502 LB566] the Committee on Judiciary Met at 1:30
    Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Judiciary Committee February 26, 2015 [LB13 LB15 LB347 LB502 LB566] The Committee on Judiciary met at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, February 26, 2015, in Room 1113 of the State Capitol, Lincoln, Nebraska, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on LB566, LB13, LB15, LB347, and LB502. Senators present: Les Seiler, Chairperson; Colby Coash, Vice Chairperson; Laura Ebke; Bob Krist; Adam Morfeld; Patty Pansing Brooks; and Matt Williams. Senators absent: Ernie Chambers. SENATOR KRIST: Okay. We're going to get started today. Senator Seiler is presenting in a different committee. Senator Coash, who is the Vice Chair, is presenting here next. So I'm going to take over as Chair for a small time today until Senator Coash is done. Please turn off your cell phones, pagers, anything that makes noises, or put it on silent, please. We'll be discussing LB566, LB13, LB15, LB347, and LB502 today. They will be held in that order. If you're going to testify, please pick up--what color are those sheets?--white sheets and fill them in with the appropriate information. If you're going to testify, when you come up to the mike make sure you talk into the mike and make sure you spell your first and last name. It's not that...that's not for us. It's for the transcribers, to make sure that they know who you are, so that they can blame you for the comments that you're making (laughter). So just speak clearly into the mike, if you would, please.
    [Show full text]