<<

EXCHANGE MODEL

Resumen El intercambio de valor es no sólo un modelo de negocios, sino también un modelo de comportamiento. Los consumidores podrían tener diferentes necesidades que no se limitan a produc- tos tangibles, sino que también están asociadas a la obtención y uso de los productos. Se suele decir que en administración el valor está referido sólo a la productividad o a una forma de satisfacer a los con- sumidores eficientemente. Sin embargo, qué significa valor para los consumidores? Cómo pueden los encargados de mercadeo desarrollar procesos para mejorar los procesos de intercambio de valor? Para comprender estos temas, en este artículo se analiza el concepto de valor desde dos perspectivas: procesos de mercadeo y consumidores. Este artículo intenta proveer un mejor entendimiento del modelo de intercambio de valor, así como analizar el concepto desde varias perspectivas.

8 Germán Contreras*

Palabras claves: Modelo de intercambio 1. Introduction de valor, mercadeo, comportamiento del con- sumidor, necesidades, gerencia de valor. Basically, marketing is a value-based concept; which forces modern marketers to employ Abstract value-exchange models. Value exchange involves understanding consumer’s social values not just Value-exchange is not just a business model but in terms of product´s competitive attributes such also a societal model of behaviour. Consumers as , quality o performance. Furthermore, may have different needs and wants that are value exchange model can be defined as the not only limited on tangible products but also system of all dyadic value exchanges; including it is about the experience of getting or using economical, social, political, psychological, and products and services. all other values. As a result, understanding, cre- One says that in management real, value ating, communicating and delivering become key is just about productivity or a form of satisfy- elements to develop a value exchange process. ing consumers efficiently. However, what does value mean for consumers? How marketers can 2. Value Exchange model improve process with companies to enhance the exchange value processes? To understand these Firstly, to understand the consumer needs and issues we analyze in this paper the value concept wants, Kotler (2003) believes that values are from two perspectives: marketing processes and a set of benefits that satisfy customers’ needs. consumers. Furthermore, Maholtra (2002) divides value This paper intends to provide a better into instrumental values that lead to desire understanding of the value-exchange model, its states such as self-confidence, accomplishment, evolution and current status, as well as examin- and terminal values such as comfortable life, ing the concept from several perspectives. peaceful world, and happiness. Key words: Value Exchange model, Secondly, the effort of creating value maketing, consumer behavior, needs, value involves the whole company and its orientation. management. In Kotler (2003), Porter explains that value

* Administrador de Empresas, Maestría en Mercadeo de Monash University. Ac- tualmente se desempeña docente e investigador del Centro de Mercadeo, adscrito a la Facultad de Administración de Empresas de la Universidad Externado de Colombia. investigación 9 combines support activities and primary activi- 3. Evolution of value exchange ties within the company. Thus, Vandenbosch et al. concept (2002) assures that organizational structures should be rethought to build a customer-value In Scott (2003), it is mentioned that Karl oriented company; which is an essential tool to Marx believes that all goods and services distinct itself from the competition in order to have both value and exchange value; which compete effectively in increasingly competitive can be defined as the amount of business environment. required in the production of any product. In 1998, Fullerton assured that man- This definition was coined within agement should not think of itself as in the framework as a value system that produces production era; instead, as provider of costumer goods and services to a self-consumed de- satisfaction. Gronroos (1994) explains that this mand. This system exists when there is human can be achieved by adding features such as qual- activity involves in production and demand of ity and attached services that are able to build a any . Consequently, the concept of value ladder. These added values generate strong exchange emerges when the surpluses of the bonds to maintain the life-term value exchange value system are switched for other represen- from business to business, customer to business, tation of value to the counterpart (profitabil- and business to customer. ity). As a result, this production for exchange Thirdly, Kotler (2003) suggests that a has become a priority and plays a substantial competitive advantage in the supply chain is role in the pre-industrial era and the creations crucial in order to be successful in delivering of the . Hence, the added labour force this value. To achieve this competitive advan- into a product and the surpluses of this value tage, it is logical to argue that a good value- system are essential to understand the present delivery network combined by both suppliers value concept. and distributors are required. This network is In 1998, Fullerton explains that - also essential in maintaining the customer value ism production era is characterised by strong exchange perception efficiently. demand of undifferentiated products from the Finally, Kotler also claims that in com- market. However, this is no longer the case; municating this value, it is more than just a because nowadays, value is considered as an matter of advertising and the sales force or a interaction between costumer and product; mixture of both elements; which means more which defines an experience. emphasis has to be placed in the customers’ In other words, value is not just the value perception created by the product or product itself but a buying and consumption service that includes: experience. In short, companies not just add value when producing a product but also when 1. Product performance succeeds in satisfying consumer’s needs before, 2. Distribution channels during and after the buying experience. It is 3. Product quality concluded that the evolution of value concept 4. Customer support has evolved from offer a tangible product to 5. Other softer attributes or tangibles assets. improve consumer’s experience.

10 4. Value as a societal model the brand-user’s self-image and the brand’s image”(O’Cass and Frost, 2002); therefore, 4.1. Perceived conspicuous value in their perception, using premium products identifies an up-market position in the status “Man” said “is a social animal.” Thus, stratum. based on Aristotle’s argument, it is logical that People using the limited edition designer every individual wants to be recognised by the perfume is usually perceived as high in status, society and, at the same time, also has to live therefore they can easily grab the public atten- in accordance with the community’s expecta- tion and generate the worship of others. So the tions. value of a brand or service can be demonstrated Since human live in a materialistic through association. The exclusive designer per- society, one may spend a substantial amount fume commands an extremely high price relative of money just to show his economic level to to similar products, which results in a transfer of others in the society. “Conspicuous consump- high social status symbolism, and social status tion is undertaken in order to enhance one’s demonstration is a dimension of conspicuous position in society, by signalling wealth, public consumption, therefore the exclusivity of the demonstration and communicating affluence to designer perfume has been utilized by users others” (Trigg, 2001). Therefore, marketers view to conspicuously demonstrate their distinctive perceived conspicuous value in consumer mind self- image and high social class. as the most important factor in determining Each individual is unique in terms of consumer behaviour. conspicuous value perception, however, every Perceived conspicuous value is not only individual engages in conspicuous consump- applied to the rich but to all social classes. tion; which inspires marketers to best utilise “Each social class tries to emulate the con- favourable brand association elements to ap- sumption behaviour of the class above it, to peal to status-conscious consumers and develop such an extent that even the poor people are conspicuous status value within their brand. subject to pressures to engage in conspicuous Knowing that consumers are driven by the desire consumption”(O’Cass and Frost, 2002). For to own and show off status brands, marketers instance, in Chinese traditional culture, there would benefit from instilling the core brand is an expectation for someone to meet others’ associations to promote conspicuous status expectations to maintain his ‘reputation’ or behaviour. Communication efforts should ac- ‘prestige’. Since impressing others is of par- centuate value-expressive appeals and concepts, ticular importance, there is a positive valuation such as status, luxury and prestige; rather than placed on conspicuous consumption. For exam- merely focusing on the brand’s physical func- ple, cigarette is used as a mean of demonstrating tions. Through creating a distinct brand image success and social class in the Chinese society; that aligns with consumer’s self-image and need which makes highly-priced foreign cigarettes for conspicuousness, marketers can apply value- able to compete competitively against the low- exchange model into practices in an effective priced local ones. and efficient manner. Status-conscious consumers are usually affected by their conspicuous value perception, 4.2. Perceived unique value and easily influenced “by status brand’s sym- bolic characteristics, by feelings evoked by the Consumers’ need for uniqueness goes back to the brand and by the degree of congruency between individuals ‘perception of value relative to other investigación 11 people that can be obtained through acquisition, a lot higher than the amount of funds they had utilisation, and disposition of consumer goods, spent; in fact, they may perceive the game as an with an aim of building, rising, and enhancing ‘invaluable’ experience. personal and social identity or status. In trying to understand customers’ per- 4.3. Perceived social value ception of a product’s unique value, individuals acquire and display material possessions and The concept of social value can be taken from so- participate in consumer experiences for the ciological and psychological texts concerning hu- purpose of developing a self-image as one who man behaviour, as individuals, or in groups; which is different from others. Some consumer groups defines it as a normal behaviour for a society or feel that they are losing their sense of uniqueness group and is shared broadly across groups of peo- since there are many other people also have the ple and consumers who emphasise more on their possession of their so-called “special commod- appearances (Vignem et al, 1998, Smith, 1975). ity”, such a niche seeking customer always tries Social values that consumers perceive are usually to move away from norm or common responses influenced by families, peer groups, religions, ethic to secure and maintain their uniqueness over- backgrounds, education and work habits and so time, which is known as ‘counterconformity.’ on playong important roles in determining an A research done by Tepper (1997) con- individual’s brand preference; which in turn will cluded that customers have three different reflect others’ perception about that individual forms of responses of counterconformity, such personality (Petrof, Elie and Vlahopoulos, 1982, as: “creative choice, unpopular choice, and Ringold, 1998). This psychological factor triggers minority choice.” Creative choice means that oneself to engage in the purchase of premium those niche seeking consumers may consider a products as a status embellishment, or as an ex- product as ‘acceptable’ if it is original, novel, and pression of self-identity and social position. unique from choices made by others; whereas One of the popular ways in realising one the ‘unpopular choice’ is exactly the opposite social value is by donation; but not every charity view from the creative one, which is by selecting has a good cause. Some donation activities are a product that is usually considered as ‘unac- actually for the purposes of establishing a par- ceptable’ by a wide number of other consumers ticular high social prestige. For example, a mul- and hence is rarely chosen. ‘Minority choice’, the timillionaire celebrity like Michael Schumacher niche-seeking consumers could select products has donated about $6 million of his fortune to that are considered as ‘acceptable’ or ‘good’, various children support schemes in developing that maybe selected by other consumers, but countries in Eastern Europe and South America. not owned by the group. With his annual income of $140million, his If one tries to relate these theories the donation amount is of no significance; however, case of people willing to pay $1/4 million just he has received praises from almost everyone; to play a round of golf with Tiger Woods, the which creates an extremely good publicity that majority of people in this world will agree that places him high in the order of the society. such an expense is illogical, irrational, or to put it in harsher words, crazy and idiotic. However, 4.4. The hedonic effect: perceived for some extremely wealthy Tiger Wood’s fans, emotional value. paying such an amount is considered as normal, logical, and worthy; because they value the Emotion is about the hedonic or other emotional moment of playing together with their idol is values of a product or service (Chaudhuri, 2002).

12 The word hedonic is derived from a Greek word, son, 1999). Pleasure-seeking driver are more ‘hedone’, which means pleasure, enjoyment or likely to enjoy the emotional driving experience delight (Shaughnessy and Shaughnessy, 2002). and less concern about the price. The emotional responses of consumption, such as sensory pleasure, aesthetic appeals, have been 4..5. Perceived Quality Value said to influence brand perceptions and purchase behaviour (Hirschman and Holbrook, 1982). In product and service, quality consists of Chaudhuri (2002) agrees that hedonic products several features, such as: future expectations, and services, which benefits are intangible, are price, solution delivery method, serviceability, related to a greater emotional consumption durability, performance, features, reliability and experiences. For example, besides functional conformance of specifications (Danny, 1999). benefits, exclusive designer perfumes or luxury Therefore, quality concept is viewed as an inte- cars generate a great deal of pleasure. grated system composed by the manufacturing Consumers are emotional animals and processes, customer satisfaction and consistency emotions are turned on by just about anything in the value-added activities; which requires that concerns us. In modern day society, the ethic organisations to configure the philosophy of of hard work is being replaced by the fun ethic the total quality management (TQM). Jackson that seeks and prefers pleasure; which struc- (1998) concludes that the quality concept is a tures one’s life (Shaughnessy, 2002). In relation relevant factor in marketing oriented business to the purchase of an expensive designer per- and differentiates the product from the rivals. fume, Vigneron and Johnson (1999) mentioned Danny at el (1999) argues that market- that an individual who places personal values ers need to combine three key elements that highly are unlikely to be concerned by price, are related to one another and considered as since a hedonist individual is triggered by his parts of quality value, i.e. price, function and own emotion. O´Cass and Frost (2002) studied received quality. The first element, price, it is that status-conscious consumers are likely to be fundamental part in customer decision making, attracted by a brand’s intangible benefits, such since customer usually assesses a product qual- as the brand image, the emotions evoked by the ity by considering of similar products and brand, and the image congruency between the its relevance in measuring the value offered. user and the brand. Functions are to fulfil the costumer’s A luxury product is a very useful tool in needs and wants based on quality consistence providing satisfactory emotional values; reflect- of the process involve in manufacturing the ed in the example of luxury car market which goods and services offered. To manage the per- for quite sometime has been moving towards ceived value must be coordinate the image and emotive approach to answer the emotional needs advertising of the brand name. This is the case of their customers. Marketers try to provide of customer groups that can be identified as a emotional values to car driver, such as fun and high consumer who require strict performance passion (Gelsi, 1997), but not functional ele- and they assumed quality as a normal part of ments, which are initially considered as actual the product or service. Also, there are costumers value of the products. The perceived emotional who are not interested on overdesign or recog- value is the extra value that hedonist like to pay nise brands assume that the level of quality is for a luxury car. A good example is the slogan of not as high as the expensive one, to exemplify, the BMW-“sheer driving pleasure”, which has been expectation of BMW driver and Renault drives, employed for many years (Vigneron and John- both expect quality but the BMW driver expect investigación 13 much more quality based on brand equity of the in marketing”, Asia – Australian Marketing Journal. brand and price associate to it. However, there vol. 32, n.o 2, pp. 4-20. are cases at which the quality can be not modify Jackson, I. (1998), “Conceptualizing total own to the consumer attitude. This the case of quality orientation”, European Journal of Marketing quality sensitivity consumer to whom quality vol. 32, n.o 1, pp. 13-22. play an important role as in the recording data Kardes, F. R., (1999), Consumer Behavior, market at which consumer avoid to purchase Addison-Wesley, New York. cheap diskette as not to take the risk to lose Kotler, P. (2003), Marketing Management, sensitive information. 11 ed., Pearson Education. Maholtra, N. (2002), Marketing Research, 5. Conclusion 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Australia O’Cass, Aron & Hmily Frost (2002), “Status Value exchange is based on consumers’ needs brands: Examining the effects of non-product-re- and wants. Different consumers may have differ- lated brand associations on status and conspicuous ent needs and wants; they also perceive different consumption”, vol. 11. values from products and services as they belong Oakes, S. (2000), “The influence of the mu- to any given society. sicscape within service environments”, The Journal To satisfying societal exchange value of Services Marketing, vol. 14, Iss. 7, p. 539. process, marketing managers should develop a Petrof, J.; Sayegh, E. E., Vlahopoulos, P. L., model to understand ones societal value system “The Influence of the School of Business on the Val- using new methods and techniques to better ues of its Students”, Academy of Marketing Science, understand value for consumers, create pro- Fall 1982; pp. 500-511. ductively what they need and want, make them Ringold, D. J., “A Comment of the Pontifical perceive societal values in brands personalities Council for Social Communications’ Ethics in Adver- when considering the brand and satisfying prop- tising” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing; Fall erly value prepositions. 1998; 17(2); pp. 332-335. Scott, H. (2003), Exchange value (http:// REFERENCES www.uta.edu/english/cgb/marx/exvalue, 2003). Shaughnessy, J. O. and Shaughnessy, N. J. Chaudhuri, A. (2002), “A study of emotion O. (2002), “Marketing, the consumer society and and reason in products and services”, Journal of hedonism”, European Journal of Marketing, vol. 36, Consumer Behaviour, vol. 1, Iss. 3, pp. 267-279. n.o 5/6, pp. 524-547, MCB University Press ISSN Danny, C. K & Eddie W. & Cheng (1999) 0309-0566. “Quest for value mix” Managing Service Quality, Smith, W. G. (1975), “The Customer-seller vol. 9 n.o 3, pp. 204-208. Value Match”, European Journal of Marketing. 9, Fullerton, R. (1998), How modern is modern 2; pp. 150-156. marketing? “Marketing evaluation and the myth of Trigg, Andrew B. (2001), “Veblen, Bourdieu, the production era”, Journal of marketing, vol. 52, and conspicuous consumption”, Journal of Economic Issue 1, pp. 108-125. Issues, vol. 35. Gelsi, S. (1997), “Class for the masses”, Vandenbosch, M. & Dawar, N. (2002), “Be- Brandweek, vol. 38, Issue 13, pp. 32-33. yon better products: capturing value in costumer Gronroos, C. (1994), “From marketing mix interactions”, Management Review, vol. 34, n.o 4 to relationship marketing: towards a paradignm shift pp. 35-42.

14 Verna, A. (2000), “The value evolution Ad- Vigneron, F. & Johnson, W. L. (1999), “A dressing larger implications of an intellectual capital Review and a Conceptual Framework of Prestige- and intangibles perspective” “ Journal of intellectual Seeking Consumer Behaviour”, Academy of Market- capital, vol. 1, n.o 1, p. 17. ing Science Review.

investigación 15