Arxiv:2001.00776V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 3 Jan 2020 Inrltosi Eidcsld a Omltdi Dove’S Dynamics

arXiv:2001.00776v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 3 Jan 2020 inrltosi eidcsld a omltdi Dove’s dynamics. in disper- lattice formulated phonon was on of solids book periodic calculation in the relations in sion focus with method in,bti otatt l h rvosmtosi was it methods previous the all posi- to of contrast space calculation in configuration the but the on tions, in based correlations also spatial is of problems vibrational of the in the simulations within equilibrium applied limit. MD classical are or they MC that of framework is approaches these all their molecular by of phases. correlations study condensed the in spatial vibrations to of applied was study matrix, the covariance on also based h rtapiain fteemtoswr h anal- the proteins. were in displacements.namics methods motions, these atomic collective of of the ysis applications of study first the matrix on The based covariance are the They classi- either simulations. of to MC or applicable MD thus cal being positions, configuration of the on space work that vibrations collective study ima nt eprtrsaebsdo h nlssof simulations. functions analysis MD the time-correlation in em- on equilib- velocity based most in transformed are the Fourier modes temperatures why finite vibrational at reason study rium the to methods random be positions. ployed a may of on space difference vibra- configuration based This of the are of analysis simulations exploration the than MC walk appropriate for positions modes. more methods of tional be (MC) space to Carlo phase seem Monte the may in momenta, gen- trajectory and that time simulations, a (MD) erate dynamics molecular ciple, oavreyo ehd o t calculation. its led for that methods investigation, of of variety topic a active to an temper- been finite has at ature simulations equilibrium from molecules orhodrfreconstants, and third force considering order by frequencies fourth framework vibrational dynamics lattice in a shifts in anharmonic describe to h ocle amnclna epne(L)analysis (HLR) response linear harmonic so-called The eetees hr r loecetapoce to approaches efficient also are there Nevertheless, h nlsso irtoa oe fsld and solids of modes vibrational of analysis The hnndseso ntodmninlsld rmaoi pr atomic from solids two-dimensional in dispersion Phonon osj ueird netgcoe in´fia CI) C Cient´ıficas (CSIC), Investigaciones de Superior Consejo uedpnec ftefloigosrals h iei e optical kinetic the the of demonstr observables: frequency are following the graphene of of dependence relations ture bi dispersion t graphene phonon is a the monolayer, method graphene in the by a of of validity properties relations The vibrational dispersion fluctuations. study cl atomic that the der of In methods as matrix system, those simulations. the to integral of lated path response equilibrium linear in the density on based is approach in ftodmninl(D aesfo qiiru simu equilibrium from layers (2D) two-dimensional of tions epooeahroi ierrsos HR ehdt calcul to method (HLR) response linear harmonic a propose We .INTRODUCTION I. 2 6,8,9 h rnia oeaayi (PMA), analysis mode principal The te lentv ehd seek methods alternative Other 1 12 n h ocle seta dy- essential so-called the and 7 omncaatrsi of characteristic common A n renormalization. and 4,5,11 nttt eCecad aeilsd ard(ICMM), Madrid de Materiales de Ciencia de Instituto E setal h same the Essentially 2 g oe n h lsi ouio h layer. the of moduli elastic the and mode, .Rmıe n .P Herrero P. C. and Ram´ırez R. 1–10 nprin- In 10 ahitga P)simulations. (PI) integral quantum equilibrium path of framework the within formulated itclmcaiso ierrsos n h fluctuation- the theorem. and response dissipation linear of mechanics tistical oeueo eidcsld a empe noaclassi- polymers”. a “ring onto interacting mapped of be model can cal solid) periodic (here, or system quantum molecule a how shows mechanics statistical h nlsso h ore rnfr ftecorrelation the by of graphene transform on Fourier ripples the surface of of analysis study the the to on devoted focused been has materials. work 2D theoretical and membrane, experimental a solid as thick graphene of one-atom solids. characterization (2D) experimental study two-dimensional the the of Since in dispersion method phonon HLR the the of of capability the vestigate paper. within this atoms in the cell, of not simulation symmetry did the systems translational periodic the far. of exploit have treatment so HLR crystals method previous vi- and this the Quantum by molecules investigated ones. both classical been simulations, of MC and energies and quantum MD sense to brational both as the to well in applied as generality, be cen- can broad the it a that using displays fluctuations variable atomic force. troid of the analysis of function HLR absence variable in The a conjugate displacement) the is centroid exter- the in force) an (here, fluctuation external to spontaneous equilibrium the an of in (here, system disturbance a nal of response static ehd fsuyn irtoa oe ymaso the of displacements. means atomic by of modes matrix ap- covariance vibrational mentioned HLR studying already the the of limit, to methods this related in closely Thus, becomes proach probability particle. spatial the classical of the density den- to centroid identical the that becomes so sity col- centroid, formalism its integral into path spatially the lapses classical of the polymer polymer In ring ring the particle. the limit, quantum of given mass a of represents center that the coordinate. is centroid coordinate the This i.e. of density, density centroid probability the spatial is the mapping this in concept esting h L prahwsdrvdb osdrn h sta- the considering by derived was approach HLR The h anproeo h rsn oki hnt in- to then is work present the of purpose main The mu eCnolno 84 ard Spain Madrid, 28049 Cantoblanco, de ampus eg ftecro tm,tevibrational the atoms, carbon the of nergy sia ii,ti prahi lsl re- closely is approach this limit, assical ae,adgahn.Ahroi effects Anharmonic graphane. and layer, ain tfiietmeaue hsHLR This temperature. finite at lations tdb h aclto ftetempera- the of calculation the by ated se ntecluaino h phonon the of calculation the in ested h ignlzto ftecovariance the of diagonalization the vdfo h nlsso t centroid its of analysis the from ived 25,26 t h hnndseso rela- dispersion phonon the ate npriua,svrlM simulations MC several particular, In 18 16 iiainta ilb overcome be will that limitation a bblt distributions obability h atrfruae htthe that formulates latter The 3 23,24 h Ifruainof formulation PI The ueaon of amount huge a 17–22 13–15 1–4,11,12 ninter- An However, 2 function of the out-of-plane displacements.27–32 The in- given by3 terest of the HLR study of 2D solids, such as graphene, 2 2 is to highlight several facts that, to a large extent, have △x = hx(f)i − hx(0)i = βδX f + O(f ) , (1) been overlooked in previous simulations of this material: i) the close relationship between the Fourier transform where the brackets h i indicate a thermal average, β = 2 of correlation functions of out-of-plane coordinates and 1/kBT is the inverse temperature and δX is the disper- 14,33,34 the phonon dispersion of the material; ii) the complete sion of the centroid density of the particle. This phonon dispersion of the 2D layer can be derived by ex- quantity is readily obtained from equilibrium path inte- tending the analysis of out-of-plane fluctuations to the gral simulations of the unperturbed (f ≡ 0) system. In other in-plane coordinates. A necessary step for this the classical limit for an arbitrary potential U, the dis- 2 goal is to formulate the HLR approach using symmetry persion δX becomes identical to the dispersion of the adapted coordinates in solids with 2D periodicity. spatial probability density of the particle in the potential The present paper is organized as follows. Sec. II fo- U, i.e., cuses on the formulation of the HLR method to derive δX2 ≡ δx2 = x2 − hxi2 . (2) phonon dispersion relations of 2D solids. It is divided cla into three Subsections: A) an introduction of the HLR approach using a single particle moving in a 1D poten- This relation, δX2 = δx2, is also valid for a quantum tial; B) the generalization of the method to the study of particle in a harmonic potential, UH , but anharmonici- 2D layers in thermal equilibrium by either quantum PI ties in U make that, for quantum systems, δX2 and δx2 or classical simulations; C) the treatment of reciprocal become different.35 space. Several applications to illustrate the capability The shift △x of the average position of the particle of the HLR method to calculate phonon dispersion rela- with respect to an external force f in Eq. (1) resembles tions of 2D solids are presented. Sec. III is devoted to the Hooke’s law of a mechanical system (△x = f/keff ), graphene, while Sec. IV deals with a graphene bilayer with the proportionality constant playing the role of the and graphane. Our main interest is to check the internal inverse of an effective force constant keff of the particle consistency of the HLR approach as a tool to analyze vibrating in the potential U. Thus the angular frequency spatial atomic fluctuations, derived by either classical ω of the first vibrational excitation of the particle in an or quantum path integral simulations. Therefore, when- anharmonic potential may be approximated as a function ever possible, we will compare HLR predictions of physi- of the centroid density as cal quantities that may be derived by other independent 2 1 methods. The applications include the phonon disper- mω = keff = , (3) sion of a graphene monolayer, a graphene bilayer and a βδX2 graphane layer. In the case of graphene, the temperature with m being the particle mass. This expression is the dependence of several observables related to the anharmonicity of the layer have been also analyzed, namely, harmonic linear response (HLR) approximation to vibrational excitation energies.3 This approach is different the atomic kinetic energy, the frequency of the Eg optical modes, and the elastic moduli. The paper closes with from a standard harmonic approximation (HA). The HA is temperature independent and predicts a vibrational a summary. frequency, ωH , that assuming the position x = 0 as the potential energy minimum, is given as

2 II. THE HLR METHOD 2 ∂ U mωH = 2 . (4) ∂x x=0 In this section, the HLR approach is introduced first for a single particle in an anharmonic potential, and then The HLR approach is sensitive to anharmonic effects that 3 applied to the study of 2D solids by exploiting their trans- are neglected in a HA. Note that the coefficient keff in lational symmetry. Eq. (3) defines a linear response of the particle in the potential U. Thus, in words Eq. (3) implies that, a fic- titious particle moving in the (temperature dependent) 2 harmonic potential UH = keff x /2 would display iden- A. Linear response to an external constant force tical linear response in thermal equilibrium as the true particle in the anharmonic potential U. Spatial probability densities of particles in thermal The extension of the HLR approach to a many- equilibrium carry information about their linear response body vibrational system is straightforward.3 Neverthe- to applied external forces. For the sake of clarity, a quan- less, a previous treatment of periodic systems did not tum particle having bound states in a one-dimensional exploit the translational symmetry within the simulation potential, U(x), is considered in equilibrium at tempera- supercell.18 Then, the whole set of vibrational frequen- ture T . The linear change of its average position hx(f)i cies, {ωj }, were derived as k = 0 states of the (small) under the application of an external constant force f is folded Brillouin zone (BZ) of the employed supercell. 3

This limitation is overcome in the next Subsections for Γ ﬂuctuates along a NPT simulation, but will remain the case of solids with 2D periodicity, allowing to assign constant in a NVT simulation. The average in-plane to each of the computed frequencies, ωj, its correspond- structure is calculated as ing k-vector within the (larger) unfolded BZ of the primitive lattice. req,i = hΓi hcii . (8)

The dynamic information in the vibrational problem B. Treatment of 2D solids is derived here from the spatial atomic displacements (Ri,Zi) along the simulation run. These displacement coordinates are spatial deviations with respect to the For the sake of generality, a NPT simulation with equilibrium average coordinates a flexible 2D supercell defined with translation vectors (a1,a2) is considered. Both NVT or NPT simulations Ri = hΓi (ci − hcii) , (9) with isotropic volume changes are particular cases whose treatment is easily derived from the general one. We as- sume that global translations and global rotations of the Zi = zi − hzii . (10) simulation cell are excluded from the stored trajectory, i.e., all atomic displacements in the simulation will corre- The next step for the derivation of the vibrational disper- spond to vibrational degrees of freedom. The absence of sion relations, ωj(k), is to exploit the translational sym- global translations is easily assured by maintaining the metry of the average 2D crystal structure. To this aim, center of mass of the simulation cell fixed along the sim- the set of N atoms in the simulation supercell, {ri} , is di- ulation run. Global rotations are not possible in NVT vided into disjoint basis subsets, {rj }α, with α =1,...n, or isotropic NPT simulations, as they are incompatible where n is the number of basis atoms, i.e., the number with the application of periodic boundary conditions. In of atoms within the crystallographic primitive cell. The flexible NPT simulations one should check that the al- number of atoms is identical for all subsets. It is equal gorithm employed to sample cell fluctuations does not to the number of primitive cells, Pc, within the simula- 36 allow for global cell rotations. tion supercell, i.e., Pc = N/n. E.g., for the 2D hexagonal The output of any NPT simulation is a trajectory structure of a graphene layer, the number of basis atoms showing the evolution of the simulation supercell and the is n = 2. (see Fig. 1a). Thus, in a simulation supercell N atomic positions along the simulation. The equilib- with N atoms, the carbon atoms will be classified into rium simulation cell is defined by a 2 × 2 matrix hΓi, two disjoint subsets, {rj }1 and {rj }2, each one with N/2 whose columns are the Cartesian coordinates of the cell elements. Note that, in the average crystal structure, axes, {req,i}, the Pc atoms of a given subset {req,j }α are all symmetry equivalent by the application of an appropri- ai = hΓ1i iê1 + hΓ2i iê2 , (i =1, 2) , (5) ate primitive translation of the crystal lattice. It is now convenient to relabel the displacement co- ′ where {ê1, ê2} represent unit vectors along the Cartesian ordinates of the i th atom to indicate the type of basis axes and the brackets h i indicate an ensemble average. atom. Then the subindex i (i =1,...N) will be replaced For a given observable x, hxi is estimated by an arith- by a double subindex αj, metic mean over the generated trajectory, (Ri,Zi) −→ (Rαj ,Zαj) ≡ (Xαj , Yαj,Zαj ) , (11) S −1 ′ hxi = S xs , (6) where α (α = 1,...n) indicates that the i th atom be- ′ Xs=1 longs to the α th basis subset, and j (j =1,...,Pc) is a running index for the Pc symmetry equivalent atoms of where S is the number of steps in the simulation run. the subset. In a quantum PIMD or PIMC simulation, we as- A symmetry adapted Bloch function, Xα(k), is a col- sume that the set of atomic centroid coordinates, (ri,zi) lective variable defined as a linear combination of the (i =1,...,N), are stored along the simulation run, while mass-weighted displacement coordinates of the atoms in the case of a classical MD or MC simulation, the coor- within the α′th subset,12,37 dinates (ri,zi) would correspond to the atomic positions. ri is a 2D vector in the plane of the supercell, (a1, a2), Pc mα while zi is the Cartesian coordinate in the perpendicular Xα(k)= Xαj exp(ikreq,αj ) . (12) r P out-of-plane direction. c Xj=1 It is convenient to define 2D atomic fractional coordi- ′ nates, ci, using the cell axes as basis. At a given simula- mα is the atomic mass of an atom in the α th tion step with a cell defined by Γ, the fractional coordi- subset. The number of Bloch functions is 3n, i.e., ′ nates of the i th atom are X1(k), Y 1(k), Z1(k),..., Xn(k), Y n(k), Zn(k) , that corresponds to the number of vibrational bands in the −1 ci = Γ ri . (7) 2D solid. Note that the phase factor in the discrete 4

ber. A non-diagonal element of χ(k) is calculated as b * =h */2 (b) 2 2 S ∗ ∗ MK h * −1 Xα(k)Y β(k) = S Xα(k)Y β(k) . (14) 1 s D E Xs=1 The last step is the diagonalization of the hermitean tensor χ(k) that yields 3n real eigenvalues △j (k). The eigenvectors of the tensor χ(k) are the Cartesian displacement Γ qq vectors of the vibrational modes of the crystal, while the K’ b1* eigenvectors △j (k) are a measure of the spatial dispersion of each mode. The one-body HLR result in Eq. (3), b (a) that relates the spatial dispersion δX2 with the angular 2 frequency ω, can be generalized to the many-body problem to obtain the phonon dispersion bands ωj (k) of the 2D solid as3

h 2 1 2 2 ωj (k)= . (15) 1 β∆j (k) b , 1 h1 C. Treatment of reciprocal space

∗ ∗ FIG. 1. (a) The axes (b1, b2) display a centered rectangular The reciprocal lattice vectors (a1, a2) of the equilib- cell of a graphene layer containing four atoms. The primi- rium simulation supercell are the columns of the matrix tive hexagonal axes are (h1,h2). There are 2 types of basis S defined as atoms, represented by closed and open circles, respectively. − (b) The discrete k-grid [see Eq. (17) ] used in the FT of Eq. S =2π hΓi 1 T , (16) (12) corresponding to a supercell (a1, a2) = (20b1, 12b2) is ∗ ∗ ∗ displayed by closed circles. (b1, b2,) are the reciprocal basis ∗ ∗ so that aiaj = 2πδij , with δij as the Kronecker delta. vectors of the centered lattice, while (h1,, h2,) are those of The discrete FT in Eq. (12) is defined for k-vectors that the primitive lattice. The reciprocal basis vectors of the sim- ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ are commensurate with the simulation supercell, i.e., ulation supercell are (a1, a2)=(b1/20, b2/12). The points ′ Γ,M,K, and K are symmetry points at the boundary of the ∗ ∗ ′ k = k1a + k2a = (k1 k2) . (17) hexagonal BZ. The k-points to the right of the K − K -line 1 2 , lie outside the first BZ. A translation by the reciprocal lattice ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ The rhs gives the components of k using (a1, a2) as basis vector −h1 = −(b1 + b2) moves these points within the first vectors, with k1 and k2 being integers. If the simulation BZ. cell is defined as a M1 ×M2 supercell of a crystallographic unit cell (either primitive or non-primitive), with M1 and Fourier transform (FT) is defined by the average crystal M2 as positive integers, then k1 and k2 will vary between 0 ≤ k1 ≤ M1 − 1, and 0 ≤ k2 ≤ M2 − 1. structure, {req,αj }. This phase factor does not change For some applications it is convenient to convert the when the coordinate Xαj is replaced by any other k-grid of Eq. (17) into a symmetry equivalent one, that coordinate, Yαj or Zαj , to derive the corresponding FT. The next (and nearly last) step is to calculate is located within the first BZ of the lattice. In the case the hermitean susceptibility tensor, χ(k).3 Its 3n × 3n that the crystallographic unit cell is a primitive one, the elements are defined as ensemble averages of products of set of k-vectors, g0 = (0, 0), g1 = (M1,0), g2 = (0,M2), ∗ and g3 = (M1,M2), are reciprocal lattice vectors of the the form Aα(k)Bγ (k), with α and γ as indices labeling basis atoms, and A and B as letters labeling any of primitive lattice. Then, the four vectors {k − g0, k − the (X,Y,Z) displacement coordinates. These products g1, k − g2, k − g3} correspond to symmetry equivalent are the covariance of symmetry adapted functions of points in reciprocal space. Only one point of this set will displacement coordinates. They provide a quantitative belong to the first BZ. A sufficient condition for k to be measure of the correlations in the atomic vibrations located within the BZ is to choose the point whose vector of the solid. A diagonal element of the tensor χ(k) is modulus is the smallest, i.e., derived as k ≡ min mod {k − g0, k − g1, k − g2, k − g3} . (18) S ∗ − X (k)X (k) = S 1 |X (k)|2 , (13) If the employed crystallographic unit cell is a non- α α α s primitive centered lattice, the vector from the set in Eq. D E Xs=1 (18) that is located within the first BZ is determined just where s is a running index for the simulation steps, and by making a sketch in reciprocal space of the relative po- the vertical bars denote the modulus of the complex num- sition of the grid of k-vectors in Eq. (17) and the BZ 5

1600 of the primitive lattice. See Fig. 1 for a worked exam- LO ple of a graphene layer using a non-primitive centered TO rectangular cell. ) -1 1200

c) (cm LA

III. APPLICATIONS: GRAPHENE π /2

ω ZO 800 The selected applications are intended as a test to illustrate the capability of the HLR approach in the calculation of phonon dispersion relations of 2D solids. Our TA main interest is to show the internal consistency of the 400 wavenumber ( HLR approach by comparing its predictions with other ZA independent methods, and using a graphene monolayer as main example. Our vibrational analysis requires only 0 Γ Γ spatial positions and it is equally applicable to classical M K and quantum simulations performed by either MD or MC methods. The fact that the HLR analysis can be applied indistinctly to either classical or quantum path integral FIG. 2. The harmonic phonon dispersion of graphene, ωH (k), simulations is an important feature of the method. To as derived by diagonalization of the dynamical matrix of the illustrate this capability, the selected applications of the LCBOPII potential, is shown by dotted lines that look like HLR approach for graphene include both classical as well solid lines when the slope is small. The six phonon bands are as path integral simulations. classified by their labels. The open circles are the HLR result as derived from the spatial atomic fluctuations obtained by a classical NPT simulation with the same potential model. The MD simulation was performed close to the harmonic T → 0 A. Harmonic phonon dispersion in graphene limit, at 1 K and P = 0, on a 20 × 12 supercell of a centered rectangular cell of graphene (see Fig. 1a). The 6 × 6 suscep- A simulation of the harmonic limit of an anharmonic tibility tensor χ(k) displays a block structure with separation potential must be performed in the classical low tem- of (X,Y ) (blue circles) and Z (red circles) bands. perature limit. In the quantum case, anharmonic effects related to zero-point vibrations appear even in the T → 0 limit.38 Under low temperature conditions, the a 20 × 12 supercell with N = 960 atoms was defined agreement of the HLR phonon dispersion, ω(k), and the for the graphene simulations. This rectangular supercell harmonic result, ωH (k), will serve as test of the HLR displays similar lengths in the (x, y)-directions. The di- method. ωH (k) is calculated, with independence from mension of the tensor χ(k) is 6 × 6 for graphene. The the simulation, by diagonalization of the vibrational dy- shortest distance between points of the k-grid of Eq. (17) 39 ∗ ∗ −1 namical matrix. is |a1| ≃ |a2| =0.12 A˚ (see Fig. 1b).

1. Computational conditions 2. Phonon dispersion

The empirical long-range carbon bond order poten- The LCBOPII phonon dispersion of graphene, ωH (k), tial (LCBOPII) was employed in this calculation.40 In derived from the diagonalization of the dynamic matrix, line with previous simulations a slight modification of is presented in Fig. 2. The hexagonal cell parameter the original torsion parameters was made to increase the amounts to 2.4593 A.˚ The result corresponds to a dense bending constant of a flat layer in the T → 0 limit from set of points along the boundaries of the irreducible BZ κ =0.82 eV to a more realistic value of κ =1.48 eV,41,42 (IBZ) of the hexagonal lattice. The dispersion relation of closer to experimental data and ab-initio calculations.43 graphene comprises three acoustic (A) and three optical A temperature of 1 K and vanishing external stress (O) bands, which are either in-plane longitudinal (L), in- (P =0) were chosen for the graphene MD simulation in plane transverse (T) or out-of-plane (Z). The acoustic ZA the isotropic NPT ensemble. The classical MD sim- mode displays a k2-dependence near Γ , in contrast with ulation was performed with a time step of 1 fs. The the linear dispersion of the TA and LA modes, which 6 44 equilibration run consisted on 2 × 10 MD steps (MDS) is typical for acoustic modes in 3D solids. The ωH (k) and a trajectory with 48000 layer configurations was bands in Fig. 2 (lines) are in agreement to previous cal- stored at equidistant steps from a run with 2.4 × 107 culations using the same LCBOPII model.45 MDS. The stored trajectory was used to calculate the co- The HLR result derived from the diagonalization of the variance of the atomic probability distributions by Eqs. χ(k) tensor are displayed as open circles in Fig. 2. The (13) and (14). From a non-primitive centered rectan- displayed k-points correspond to those points in Eq. (17) gular graphene cell with 4 carbon atoms (see Fig. 1a), that lie at the boundary of the IBZ. The agreement with 6 the ωH (k) dispersion is excellent for the six vibrational 0.13 bands. The calculation of the tensor χ(k) includes the constraint provided by translational symmetry, but not from point symmetry elements of the crystal. Then, the 0.12 PIMD symmetry of the vibrational modes will display errors HLR associated to the finite sampling along the simulation. harmonic − 0.11 E.g., this error is about 0.3 % (∼6 cm 1) for the degenerate LO and TO modes at Γ . One could impose additional symmetry constraints (rotational axes and reflec- 0.1 tion planes) to the tensor χ(k) to ensure that the vibrational modes display the correct symmetry and smaller statistical errors. The reducible representation of the dis- 0.09 placement vectors (Xαj , Yαj ,Zαj ) of atoms in a solid is the same as that of atomic p-orbitals. Thus, the method vibrational kinetic energy (eV/atom) k 0.08 to symmetrize χ( ) would be identical to that already 0 200 400 600 800 used for the density matrices associated to p-orbitals in temperature (K) electronic band structure calculations based on crystal orbital methods.46,47 In the next Subsections, anharmonic shifts predicted by the HLR approach, caused by quantum zero-point mo- FIG. 3. Vibrational kinetic energy of the carbon atoms in tion and/or by an increase in temperature, are analyzed graphene as a function of temperature. The “exact” quantum PIMD result derived from the virial estimator (open squares) showing that they do lead to a consistent description of is compared to the approximation of Eq. (19) using the set the collective vibrations. of vibrational frequencies, ω(k), obtained either by the HLR approach (open diamonds) or in the harmonic approximation (open circles). The lines are guides to the eye. B. Atomic kinetic energy in graphene

4 The vibrational kinetic energy of atoms in solids or a set of 1.6 × 10 crystal configurations stored at equidis- molecules is a physical quantity that is affected by both tant steps along the run. Further simulation conditions quantum and anharmonic effects.48 The kinetic energy of are identical to those already described in our previous 38,50 the carbon atoms in graphene can be obtained by quan- PIMD graphene simulations. tum PI simulations using the virial estimator.49 This non- perturbative approach allows for an, in principle, “exact” treatment of both quantum and anharmonic effects as 2. Kinetic energy in the HLR approximation a function of temperature. This quantum observable is used to test the predictions of the HLR approach. In the The kinetic energy per atom, as derived from the classical limit, the vibrational kinetic energy amounts to PIMD simulation, is presented as a function of tempera- kBT/2 per degree of freedom (equipartition theorem), a ture in Fig. 3 as open squares. We observe that at low value that does not depend on the anharmonicity of the temperature the kinetic energy converges toward a con- interatomic potential. stant zero-point value, while as temperature increases the thermal excitation of vibrational modes produces a grad- ual increase of the kinetic energy that tends to linearity 1. Computational conditions in the high temperature limit. The vibrational kinetic energy per atom can be esti- Quantum PIMD simulations of graphene with the mated from the HLR frequencies, ωj (k), derived by di- LCBOPII model in the isotropic NPT ensemble were agonalization of the susceptibility tensor, χ(k), as performed at discrete temperatures between 25 and 750 Nk 3n 1 ~ω (k ) β~ω (k ) K for an unstressed layer (P = 0). The simulation cell E = j i coth j i , (19) K nN 4 2 with N = 960 atoms is the same as that one described k Xi=1 Xj=1 in Subsec. III A. The Trotter number, NTr, that char- acterizes the applied discretization of the path integral where the number of basis atoms is n =2, and the num- was set as a temperature dependent value by the rela- ber of k-points is Nk =240 (as corresponds to the 20×12 tion NTrT = 6000 K. At 25 K, the lowest studied tem- simulation supercell, see Subsec. II C). Each mode of perature, NTr = 240, while at 750 K, the highest studied frequency, ωj (k), is assumed to contribute to the kinetic temperature, NTr = 8. The time step was set as 0.5 energy by a quantum harmonic expression. Therefore fs, equilibration and simulations runs comprise 5 × 105 anharmonicity in this model appears only in the value of 6 MDS and 8 × 10 MDS, respectively. At each tempera- the frequencies, ωj (k), which may display shifts with re- ture, the susceptibility tensor χ(k) was calculated from spect to the harmonic limit. The HLR estimation of the 7 kinetic energy is displayed in Fig. 3 as open diamonds. LO, TO We observe an excellent agreement to the “exact” kinetic energy derived by the virial estimator at temperatures below 300 K. Anharmonic effects are present in the ) 1500 whole temperature range, but it is expected that they -1 become larger as temperature rises. This might be the reason for the slight underestimation of the “exact” value c) (cm of EK by the HLR approximation at the highest stud- π ied temperatures around 750 K. Even at this relatively /2 1000 high temperature, the kinetic energy in the classical limit ω (3kBT/2=0.097 eV/atom) is significantly lower (∼24%) than the value derived in the quantum approach. The contribution of anharmonicity to the kinetic energy can be evaluated by calculation of the harmonic 500 limit, EKH , of the employed model potential. EKH is derived by replacing the HLR frequencies, ωj (k), in Eq. wavenumber ( (19) by harmonic ones, ωH,j (k). The harmonic values, ωH,j (k), which do not depend on temperature, were calculated by diagonalization of the dynamical matrix for 0 a layer corresponding to the minimum potential energy Γ M (see Fig. 2). The harmonic kinetic energy, EKH , shown as open circles in Fig. 3, differs appreciably from the “exact” EK in the whole temperature range. The anharmonic effect predicted by the LCBOPII model is an increase in the vibrational kinetic energy. The increase FIG. 4. The HLR result for the phonon dispersion of graphene amounts to about 5% at low temperatures, and is lower derived from a quantum PIMD simulation at 300 K is represented by open circles along Γ − M. The dotted lines show at higher temperatures (∼ 2% at 750 K). This behav- the harmonic limit of the same model. The main anharmonic ior at high temperature is surely due to a compensation effect is a blue-shift of the LO and TO bands. These results of errors, as anharmonic effects are expected to increase were derived with the LCBOPII model. with temperature. The improved results of the HLR approach with respect to the harmonic limit reveal that the HLR frequencies are really sensitive to the anharmonic wavenumber of graphene at Γ calculated in Ref. 42 from effect in the vibrational modes. the Fourier transform of velocity time correlation functions with the LCBOPII model is displayed as a function of temperature in Fig. 5 (crosses). For compari- C. Temperature dependence of the optical phonons son, the HLR result, as derived from classical simulations in graphene with the same potential model, is displayed as circles. A similar non-monotonic temperature dependence of the 1. LCBOPII model anisotropic shift of this optical mode is predicted by both methods, although there appear quantitative differences The HLR phonon dispersion of graphene along the in the LO/TO wavenumbers, specially at high tempera- Γ − M symmetry direction, derived from the quantum tures. PIMD simulations at 300 K, is compared to the harmonic result in Fig. 4. We observe that the main anharmonic effect is a blue-shift of the LO and TO bands that amounts 2. Tight-binding model to ∼ 100 cm−1 (∼ 6%) at the BZ center Γ . This anharmonic shift is the origin for the increase in the vibrational We have re-analyzed the temperature dependence of kinetic energy of the C atoms in the quantum PIMD sim- the frequency of the degenerate LO and TO optical ulation, in comparison to the quantum harmonic limit, as phonons of graphene at Γ using an efficient tight- shown in Fig. 3. Nevertheless, this blue-shift seems to be binding (TB) Hamiltonian parameterized using density- an artifact of the LCBOP model, as it is in disagreement functional calculations,54 as an improved alternative to to both first-principles calculations51 and experimental the LCBOPII model. The symmetry of this Raman ac- 52 results derived from Raman spectra. tive mode is E2g and corresponds to the G peak in the An anharmonic blue-shift of the optical modes in Raman spectra.55 graphene has been reported in three recent studies of a. Computational conditions: Quantum and classi- the temperature dependence of its vibrational properties cal simulations of graphene were performed in the NPT using either the LCBOP or LCBOPII potentials in clas- ensemble with isotropic volume fluctuations at P = 0. sical MD simulations.9,42,53 The results of the LO/TO The electronic structure has been treated with an effi- 8

1800 1800 ) -1 1700 1780 ) 1600 -1 1760

Ref. 42 1500 1740

optical mode (cm HLR

1400 1720

0 500 1000 1500 2000 optical mode (cm temperature (K) 1700

FIG. 5. Temperature dependence of the degenerate LO/TO 1680 phonon wavenumber of graphene at Γ as derived from clas- 0 200 400 600 800 1000 sical simulations with the LCBOPII model. The results of temperature (K) Ref. 42, displayed by crosses, were derived from the Fourier transformed velocity time correlation functions. The results of the HLR analysis of classical MD simulations are given as FIG. 6. Temperature dependence of the E2g degenerate open circles. Lines are guides to the eye. LO/TO vibrational states of graphene at Γ . This state corresponds to the G peak in the Raman spectrum. The results were derived by the HLR analysis of classical MD (open cir- cient tight-binding (TB) Hamiltonian parameterized us- cles) and quantum PIMD (open squares) trajectories using a ing density-functional calculations.54 The temperature TB Hamiltonian. The continuous line is a linear fit of the classical result. The broken line is the least-squares fit of the was varied between 50 and 1000 K in the quantum PIMD quantum result to Eq. (20). simulations, and between 1 and 1000 K in the classical MD simulations. The time step was taken between 0.25 and 1 fs. The lowest time step of 0.25 fs was re- frequency, as opposed to the results derived previously for quired for the quantum simulations at 50 K, where the the LCBOPII model. The quantum results for the tem- atomic spatial delocalizations related to the zero-point perature dependence of this optical mode differ from the quantum fluctuations are the largest. The simulation cell classical ones, specially below room temperature. The included 60 carbon atoms with periodic boundary condi- intrinsic anharmonicity of the zero-point vibration of the tions and the electronic energy was obtained using only carbon atoms makes that the optical modes display a the Γ -point for the calculation of the crystal band struc- shift of ∼−64 cm−1 with respect to the classical expec- ture. The Trotter number, NTr, was set as a temperature tation in the low temperature limit. dependent value by the relation NTrT = 6000 K. Simu- 6 Temperature-dependent Raman scattering experi- lation runs comprise 8×10 MDS and the analysis of the ments have shown that the temperature variation of the atomic real space fluctuations was performed on a subset 4 phonon line center can be attributed to the anharmonic- of 1.6 × 10 configurations stored equidistantly along the ity in the vibrational potential, which leads to the decay whole trajectory. of optical phonons into low-energy acoustic phonons. The b. HLR analysis of the LO/TO phonons: The tem- effect of this decay on the frequency of the optical modes perature dependence of the optical LO and TO vibra- at Γ has been described by the expression57 tional modes at Γ as derived from the HLR method is displayed in Fig. 6. In the classical limit the optical 2 ∆ω(T )= ω(T ) − ω0 = C 1+ , mode display a linear temperature dependence. The clas- exp [~ω0/2kBT ] − 1 sical T → 0 limit corresponds to the harmonic expecta- (20) −1 tion, ωH = 1798 cm , for the TB model under the where ω0 is the intrinsic frequency of the optical phonon, −1 employed computational conditions. This value overes- i.e., ω0 ≡ ωH (T → 0) = 1798 cm , and C is the an- timates by about 12% the experimental value.52 Vibra- harmonic constant. The least-squares fit of the HLR re- tional frequencies determined from ab-initio calculations sults to Eq. (20) is shown in Fig. 6. The anharmonic are often scaled by empirical factors to compensate for constant amounts to C = −64.7 cm−1. At 300 K the −1 systematic biases that overestimate frequencies by about temperature coefficient ϕT = −0.026 cm /K derived 10% (e.g. in Hartree-Fock 6-31G(d) models).56 from the quantum simulation is about 5 times smaller In the classical limit, the change of the optical mode that the classical prediction. The quantum result is in frequency with temperature is given by a slope of ϕT = excellent agreement with the temperature coefficient de- −0.1 cm−1/K. The negative sign of the slope indicates rived from Raman measurements for single-walled carbon that the anharmonicity of the optical modes predicted nanotubes with a wide range of diameters,58 although the by the TB method is indeed a red-shift of the vibrational diameter of the nanotube did not have any obvious influ- 9 ence on the value of ϕT . The experimental average value (a) (X,Y,Z) (b) (X,Y, Z=0) over nanotubes of different diameters was ϕT = −0.026 cm−1/K, a value which was also obtained in subsequent 52 20 Raman investigations. ) B’ B’ 2

D. Temperature dependence of elastic moduli in 15 graphene B The temperature dependence of the elastic moduli is B 59

another important anharmonic eﬀect, that will be an- elastic nodulus (eV/Å 10 alyzed in graphene by the HLR approach. µ µ

5 1. Computational conditions 0 300 600 900 0 300 600 900 temperature (K) Classical MD simulations of graphene in the isotropic NPT ensemble were performed with the LCBOPII model at discrete temperatures between 1 and 1000 K for an FIG. 7. Temperature dependence of elastic moduli of unstressed layer (P = 0). The simulation cell with graphene as derived from the HLR analysis of classical MD ′ N = 960 atoms was the same as that one described in simulations. Open circles are results for µ and B derived Subsec. IIIA. The time step was set as 1 fs. Two sets from a least-squares fit of the phonon dispersion curves. Open squares are the estimation of the in-plane stiffness as of simulations were performed. In the first one, the car- ′ − bon atoms move unconstrained along trajectories with B = B µ. The crosses are values of B from the fluctuation formula in Eq. (26). Lines are guides to the eye. Panel (a) 2.4×107 MDS. In the second set, the carbon atoms moved 6 shows results of simulations where the layer atoms move with- along trajectories with 8 × 10 MDS in the (x, y)-plane out constraints in the (x,y,z) space. In Panel (b) the carbon (the atomic z-coordinate is constraint as z = 0) . The atoms move in the (x,y)-plane with the constraint z = 0. The acoustic LA and TA phonon dispersions (see Fig. 2) were results were derived with the LCBOPII model. derived by a HLR analysis of the trajectories. The slopes of the acoustic TA and LA phonons of graphene in the long-wavelength limit (k → 0) (see Fig. 2) correspond to compressional modulus defined as,61 the sound velocities vT and vL. They were determined by ′ a least-squares fit of the corresponding phonon dispersion B = λ +2µ , (24) bands using the function where λ is the Lam’s first coefficient.61 The in-plane com-

2 2 4 1/2 pressional modulus (the 2D analogous to the bulk mod- ω = v k + ck , (21) ulus) is derived from µ and B′ as61 ′ where v is the sound velocity and c is a fitting constant. B = B − µ = λ + µ . (25) Only those k-points with modulus k < 0.43 A˚−1 were included in the fit. The temperature dependence of the elastic moduli, µ and B′ of graphene, as derived from the HLR analysis are presented in Fig. 7 as open circles. In the strictly flat 2D 2. Elastic moduli from the HLR analysis layer (z = 0 for the C atoms, Fig. 7b) the shear modulus µ is nearly temperature independent, while the moduli ′ The sound velocities of the acoustic (TA and LA) B and B decrease slightly with temperature. phonons of 2D layers provide information on its elastic It is interesting to compare the HLR result for the moduli. The sound velocities of the TA and LA branches compressional modulus, B (open squares in Fig. 7b), for an isotropic 2D elastic media are60 to the value calculated by the fluctuation formula in the NPT ensemble,62,63 1/2 µ V vT = , (22) B = , (26) ρ NβδV 2 where V denotes the average in-plane area per atom that B′ 1/2 fluctuates in the NPT ensemble with dispersion δV 2. v = . (23) L ρ The values of B derived from this equation are presented by crosses in Fig. 7b. Within the statistical error of the where ρ is the in-plane mass density, µ is the shear mod- simulations, the values of B by the HLR analysis are in ulus (Lam’s second coefficient), and B′ is the unilateral good agreement with the fluctuation formula. 10

The results for B′, µ, and B as derived by the HLR 1600 analysis when the atoms of the layer move without con-

straint are displayed in Fig. 7a. The atomic out-of-plane ) -1 vibrations have a signiﬁcant inﬂuence in the elastic mod- 1200 uli of the layer, that display a more pronounced tempera-

c) (cm LA

ture dependence than in Fig. 7b. A striking result is that π the HLR values of the in-plane compressional modulus B /2

ω ZO (open squares) are now systematically larger than those 800 derived from the fluctuation formula (crosses) in Fig. 7a. The atomic displacements in the out-of-plane direction, causing the spatial corrugation of the 2D layer, must be 400 TA the origin of this unexpected behavior. wavenumber ( Several plausible effects may explain the fact that Eqs. ZO’ (25) and (26) give different results for a 2D layer fluc- 0 ZA tuating in 3 dimensions. One possibility is that the an- Γ M K Γ harmonicity of the out-of-plane displacements is not cor- rectly reproduced by the HLR analysis. However, any anharmonic effect in a classical simulation should decrease gradually with temperature and eventually vanish in the FIG. 8. The harmonic phonon dispersion of bilayer graphene low temperature limit, a behavior that is not supported with stacking AB, as derived from the dynamical matrix of the by the results of Fig. 7a. LCBOPII model, is shown by dotted lines that look like solid lines when the slope is small. Open circles represent the HLR A second possibility is that the disagreement between result as derived from a classical NPT simulation using the the results derived from Eqs. (25) and (26) is a finite same model. The MD simulation was performed close to the size effect related to the out-of-plane vibrations. We have harmonic T → 0 limit, at 1 K and P = 0, using a supercell checked the finite size effect at 300 K by increasing the with N = 1920 atoms. The 12 × 12 susceptibility tensor cell size from N = 960to N = 8400 atoms. The size effect χ(k) displays a block structure with separation of (X,Y ) (blue reduces the value of B. However, the decrease derived circles) and Z (red circles) bands. from the HLR phonon dispersion relations is lower (∼ 21%) than that derived from the fluctuation formula (∼ 27%). Thus, this effect would make the disagreement found between both results even larger. model amounts to 2.4584 A,˚ while the interlayer distance An intriguing explanation for the disagreement in the is 3.3372 A.˚ The simulation cell includes two atomic lay- results of B in Fig. 7a and the agreement in Fig. 7b, ers adding up N = 1920 atoms. The dimension of the is that when the 2D layer fluctuates in the z-direction, tensor χ(k) is 12×12 for the bilayer. A comparison of the forming ripples and loosing its strictly 2D character, the harmonic dispersion curves, ωH (k), with those derived by in-plane compressional modulus B in Eq. (25) becomes the HLR approach is presented in Fig. 8. We find that different than that one in Eq. (26). Ripples depend on the agreement between both methods is excellent for the an additional elastic modulus, the bending stiffness, κ, 12 vibrational bands. that for an atom thick layer is a constant independent All vibrational bands of bilayer graphene, except ZA from the Lam coefficients, λ and µ. (see Fig. 8), appear as degenerate at the scale of the figure. The ZA band of graphene is splitted into ZA and ZO’ bands in the bilayer. The larger splitting is found at Γ IV. APPLICATIONS: GRAPHENE BILAYER − where the frequency of the ZO’ mode amounts to 91 cm 1 AND GRAPHANE (see Fig. 8). This is the layer breathing mode, where the z-distance between the two graphene layers oscillates Examples of the application of the HLR approach to around its equilibrium value. The acoustic LA and TA 2D layers different from graphene monolayer is illustrated modes of graphene also split in the bilayer, but the split- for a graphene bilayer and for chair-graphane. ting is too small to be seen in Fig. 8. The largest splitting is again found at Γ and amounts to 15 cm−1. This vibrational mode of the bilayer corresponds to a rigid layer A. Harmonic phonon dispersion in a graphene shear mode, involving the relative motion of atoms in bilayer adjacent planes. Raman spectroscopy of a graphene bilayer gives a frequency of 32 cm−1 for this rigid layer A classical MD NPT simulation of a graphene bilayer shear mode,64 while the ZO’ breathing mode appears at with AB stacking has been performed at T = 1 K and 89 cm−1 at Γ .65 The splitting of the LO and TO modes P = 0 with similar computational conditions as those em- at Γ is even smaller, less that 1 cm−1 with the LCBOPII ployed for graphene in the previous Subsec. III A. The model. The splitting obtained with density-functional hexagonal cell parameter with the employed LCBOPII perturbation theory amounts to 5 cm−1.66 11

3000 ) -1 c) (cm

π 2000 /2 ω

1000 wavenumber (

0 FIG. 9. 2D structure of chair-graphane. Carbon and hydro- Γ M K Γ gen atoms are represented by circles, the smaller ones correspond to H.

FIG. 10. The harmonic phonon dispersion of chair-graphane, B. Vibrational anharmonic effects in as calculated from the dynamical matrix of the employed TB chair-graphane model, is shown by lines. HLR wavenumbers derived from classical NPT simulations with the same TB model at P = 0, 1. Computational conditions using a supercell with N = 192 atoms, are shown at temperatures of 300 K (open circles) and 1 K (crosses). A significant anharmonic red-shift is visible in the bands associated to the The 2D layer structure of chair-graphane is displayed − −1 in Fig. 9. The electronic structure has been treated C H stretching vibrations at frequencies around 2850 cm . The HLR results for the other vibrational bands at 300 K and with the TB electronic band structure method of Sub- at 1K are nearly indistinguishable at the scale of the figure. sec. IIIC. The hexagonal cell displays a cell parameter of 2.5320 A,˚ and the vertical atomic distances to the mean layer plane are 0.2319 A˚ for C and 1.3576 A˚ for atomic vibrations are expected to appear as the temper- H. Classical MD simulations with the isotropic NPT en- ature rises. Therefore, at 300 K deviations of the HLR semble were performed on a 6 × 4 supercell of a centered phonon dispersion from the harmonic limit indicate the rectangular cell containing N = 192 atoms, at external presence of anharmonic effects in the corresponding vi- stress P = 0, and temperatures of T = 1 K and T = 300 brational modes. The HLR phonon dispersion curves at K. Only the Γ point for the sampling of the BZ of the 300 K is displayed by open circles in Fig. 10. The most simulation supercell was used in the electronic structure significant anharmonic effect is a red-shift of the bands calculation. The equilibration run consisted on 2 × 105 associated to the stretching of the C−H bonds by about MDS and a trajectory with 10000 layer configurations − 150 cm 1, while anharmonic effects in the rest of vibra- was stored at equidistant steps from a run with 2 × 106 tional bands are comparatively low. For many organic MDS. The classical MD simulation was performed with molecules, the anharmonicity of C–H modes is estimated a time step of 1 fs. to red-shift the harmonic stretching frequency by about 120–140 cm−1.69 2. Phonon dispersion

The harmonic phonon dispersion of chair-graphane, V. SUMMARY as derived from the dynamical matrix of the employed TB model, is displayed in Fig. 10 (lines). There ap- We have presented the HLR method as a tool to study pear 12 dispersion bands. The two flat dispersion bands the phonon dispersion relations of 2D layers from the around 3000 cm−1 correspond to the stretching of the analysis of trajectories generated by equilibrium MD or C−H bonds along the z-direction perpendicular to the MC simulations, either with the quantum PI formalism, layer. The general appearance of the TB harmonic or in the classical limit. The HLR method is based on the dispersion bands show reasonable agreement to previ- analysis of the spatial correlations of centroid or atomic ous calculations by first-principles electronic structure displacements by means of the diagonalization of the co- calculations.67,68 The result of the HLR analysis of a variance matrices associated to these displacements. The classical graphane simulation at 1 K, displayed in Fig. HLR method for 2D layers could be straightforwardly ap- 10 (crosses), is identical, within the statistical error of plied to 1D or 3D solids. The only difference is that in the simulation, to the harmonic dispersion bands. the Fourier transform of Eq. (12) the dimension of the Anharmonic effects due to the increased amplitude of req- and k-vectors will depend on the the dimensionality 12 of the problem. by the HLR method. The comparison of the quantum re- The physical information needed in the HLR method is sults and the classical limit display the significant anhar- the static susceptibility tensor, χ(k), that defines the lin- monicity of the zero-point vibrations. Another studied ear response of an equilibrium system to static forces. As anharmonic effect is the temperature dependence of the the linear response of the system depends on the anhar- elastic moduli of graphene. An intriguing difference has monicity of the interatomic potential, anharmonic effects been found in alternative ways to calculate the in-plane are included in the HLR approach in a realistic way. compressional modulus of a graphene layer, either by the By means of classical MD simulations at very low tem- HLR phonon dispersion curves or by the fluctuation of peratures, we have checked that the HLR approach repro- the area in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble. Both meth- duces the harmonic phonon dispersion relations obtained ods provide identical result for a strict 2D planar layer, by diagonalization of the dynamical matrix. This test but display a systematic difference in the presence of out- has been presented for several 2D systems: a graphene of-plane fluctuations of the layer. monolayer, a graphene bilayer, and a graphane monolayer. The sensitivity of the HLR approach to reproduce anharmonic effects has been demonstrated by the cal- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS culation of the temperature dependence of the atomic kinetic energy of carbon atoms in graphene by quan- This work was supported by Direccin General de Inves- tum PIMD simulations. Anharmonic shifts in the op- tigacin, MINECO (Spain) through Grants No. FIS2015- tical phonon frequencies of graphene have been derived 64222-C2-1-P and PGC2018-096955-B-C44.

1 T. Ichiye and M. Karplus, Proteins: Struct., Funct., and 20 C. P. Herrero, R. Ram´ırez, and E. R. Hernández, Phys. Bioinform. 11, 205 (1991). Rev. B 73, 245211 (2006). 2 A. Amadei, A. B. M. Linssen, and H. J. C. Berendsen, 21 C. P. Herrero and R. Ram´ırez, Phys. Rev. B 80, 035207 Proteins: Struct., Function, and Bioinform. 17, 412 (1993). (2009). 3 R. Ram´ırez and T. López-Ciudad, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 22 C. P. Herrero and R. Ram´ırez, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174117 103 (2001). (2010). 4 R. A. Wheeler and H. Dong, ChemPhysChem 4, 1227 23 K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, (2003). Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. 5 M. Schmitz and P. Tavan, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 12233 Firsov, Science 306, 666 (2004). (2004). 24 K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T. J. Booth, V. V. 6 M. Martinez, M.-P. Gaigeot, D. Borgis, and R. Vuilleu- Khotkevich, S. V. Morozov, and A. K. Geim, PNAS 102, mier, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 144106 (2006). 10451 (2005). 7 J. E. Turney, E. S. Landry, A. J. H. McGaughey, and 25 B. Amorim, R. Roldán, E. Cappelluti, A. Fasolino, C. H. Amon, Phys. Rev. B 79, 064301 (2009). F. Guinea, and M. I. Katsnelson, Phys. Rev. B 89, 224307 8 J. A. Thomas, J. E. Turney, R. M. Iutzi, C. H. Amon, and (2014). A. J. H. McGaughey, Phys. Rev. B 81, 081411 (2010). 26 R. Roldan, L. Chirolli, E. Prada, J. Angel Silva-Guillen, 9 E. N. Koukaras, G. Kalosakas, C. Galiotis, and K. Pa- P. San-Jose, and F. Guinea, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 4387 pagelis, Scientific Reports 5, 12923 (2015). (2017). 10 N. K. Ravichandran and D. Broido, Phys. Rev. B 98, 27 A. Fasolino, J. H. Los, and M. I. Katsnelson, Nature 085205 (2018). Mater. 6, 858 (2007). 11 R. A. Wheeler, H. Dong, and S. E. Boesch, 28 P. Liu and Y. W. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 231912 ChemPhysChem 4, 382 (2003). (2009). 12 M. T. Dove, Introduction to Lattice Dynamics (Cambridge 29 J. H. Los, M. I. Katsnelson, O. V. Yazyev, K. V. Za- University Press, 1993). kharchenko, and A. Fasolino, Phys. Rev. B 80, 121405 13 R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and (2009). Path Integrals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965). 30 K. V. Zakharchenko, J. H. Los, M. I. Katsnelson, and 14 R. P. Feynman and H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. A 34, 5080 A. Fasolino, Phys. Rev. B 81, 235439 (2010). (1986). 31 R. Roldán, A. Fasolino, K. V. Zakharchenko, and M. I. 15 D. M. Ceperley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 279 (1995). Katsnelson, Phys. Rev. B 83, 174104 (2011). 16 R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume, Statistical Physics 32 J. Haˇs´ık, E. Tosatti, and R. Martoˇnák, Phys. Rev. B 97, II, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991). 140301 (2018). 17 T. López-Ciudad, R. Ram´ırez, J. Schulte, and M. C. 33 J. Cao and B. J. Berne, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 7531 (1990). Böhm, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 4328 (2003). 34 G. A. Voth, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5302 (1991). 18 R. Ram´ırez and C. P. Herrero, Phys. Rev. B 72, 024303 35 R. Ram´ırez and T. López-Ciudad, J. Chem. Phys. 111, (2005). 3339 (1999). 19 R. Ram´ırez, C. P. Herrero, and E. R. Hernández, Phys. 36 G. J. Martyna, M. E. Tuckerman, D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Rev. B 73, 245202 (2006). Klein, Mol. Phys. 87, 1117 (1996). 13

37 C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, New 66 J.-A. Yan, W. Y. Ruan, and M. Y. Chou, Phys. Rev. B York, 1966). 77, 125401 (2008). 38 C. P. Herrero and R. Ram´ırez, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 224701 67 E. Cadelano, P. L. Palla, S. Giordano, and L. Colombo, (2016). Phys. Rev. B 82, 235414 (2010). 39 G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, and J. Hafner, Europhys. Lett. 68 H. Peelaers, A. D. Hernández-Nieves, O. Leenaerts, B. Par- 32, 729 (1995). toens, and F. M. Peeters, Applied Phys. Lett. 98, 051914 40 J. H. Los, L. M. Ghiringhelli, E. J. Meijer, and A. Fasolino, (2011). Phys. Rev. B 72, 214102 (2005). 69 F. S. Gentile, S. Salustro, M. Causà, A. Erba, P. Car- 41 R. Ram´ırez, E. Chacón, and C. P. Herrero, Phys. Rev. B bonniére, and R. Dovesi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 93, 235419 (2016). 22221 (2017). 42 D. Tisi, Temperature dependence of phonons in graphene, Master’s thesis, Universitàdi Modena e Reggio Emilia (2017). 43 P. Lambin, Appl. Sci. 4, 282 (2014). 44 J. Zimmermann, P. Pavone, and G. Cuniberti, Phys. Rev. B 78, 045410 (2008). 45 I. L. M. Locht, The effect of temperature on the phonon dispersion relation in graphene, Master’s thesis, Radboud University of Nijmegen (2012), p. 70. 46 C. Pisani and R. Dovesi, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 17, 501 (1980). 47 R. Ram´ırez and M. C. Böhm, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 34, 47 (1988). 48 R. Ram´ırez and C. P. Herrero, Phys. Rev. B 84, 064130 (2011). 49 M. F. Herman, E. J. Bruskin, and B. J. Berne, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 5150 (1982). 50 C. P. Herrero and R. Ram´ırez, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 102302 (2018). 51 N. Bonini, M. Lazzeri, N. Marzari, and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 176802 (2007). 52 X. Zhang, F. Yang, D. Zhao, L. Cai, P. Luan, Q. Zhang, W. Zhou, N. Zhang, Q. Fan, Y. Wang, H. Liu, W. Zhou, and S. Xie, Nanoscale 6, 3949 (2014). 53 P. Anees, M. C. Valsakumar, and B. K. Panigrahi, 2D Mater. 2, 035014 (2015). 54 D. Porezag, T. Frauenheim, T. Köhler, G. Seifert, and R. Kaschner, Phys. Rev. B 51, 12947 (1995). 55 A. C. Ferrari and D. M. Basko, Nature Nanotech. 8, 235 (2013). 56 K. K. Irikura, R. D. Johnson, and R. N. Kacker, J. Phys. Chem. A 109, 8430 (2005). 57 S. Anand, P. Verma, K. Jain, and S. Abbi, Physica B: Condensed Matter 226, 331 (1996). 58 Y. Zhang, L. Xie, J. Zhang, Z. Wu, and Z. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 14031 (2007). 59 M. Katsnelson, in Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics, edited by F. Bassani, G. L. Liedl, and P. Wyder (Elsevier, Oxford, 2005) pp. 77 – 82. 60 M. G. Cottam, in Dynamical Properties in Nanostructured and Low-Dimensional Materials, 2053-2563 (IOP Publish- ing, 2015) pp. 2–1 to 2–26. 61 F. Behroozi, Langmuir 12, 2289 (1996). 62 L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, 3rd ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980). 63 R. Ram´ırez and C. P. Herrero, Phys. Rev. B 95, 045423 (2017). 64 P. H. Tan, W. P. Han, W. J. Zhao, Z. H. Wu, K. Chang, H. Wang, Y. F. Wang, N. Bonini, N. Marzari, N. Pugno, G. Savini, A. Lombardo, and A. C. Ferrari, Nature Mate- rials 11, 294 (2012). 65 M.-L. Lin, J.-B. Wu, X.-L. Liu, and P.-H. Tan, J. Raman Spectros. 49, 19 (2018).