DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Board of Revenue Anti-Money Laundering and Counter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Board of Revenue Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism Guidelines for Real Estate Agents (REAs) Federal Board of Revenue Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism Guidelines for Real Estate Agents December 2020 1 | P a g e Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism Guidelines for Real Estate Agents (REAs) Table of Contents Acronyms/terms ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Target audience .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope and terminology ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Structure ................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Background .................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Why are REAs required to comply with AML / CFT? ..................................................................... 3 2.2 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) ................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG) ............................................................................ 3 2.4 The FATF grey list ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.5 Money laundering ................................................................................................................................. 3 2.6 Terrorism financing.............................................................................................................................. 4 2.7 Differences between money laundering and terrorism financing ............................................ 4 3. Pakistan AML/CFT Regulatory Regime ................................................................................................... 5 3.1 AML/CFT regulatory regime in Pakistan .......................................................................................... 5 3.2 Government authorities responsible for REAs............................................................................... 6 4. Real Estate Agents and Activities Subject to AML/CFT ..................................................................... 7 4.1 Real estate agents (REAs) and specified activities subject to AML/CFT .................................. 7 4.2 Categories of REAs subject to AML/CFT .......................................................................................... 8 4.3 Real estate activities/services subject to AML/CFT ..................................................................... 8 4.4 Real estate activities/services not subject to AML/CFT .............................................................. 9 4.5 Customers (seller and buyer) subject to AML/CFT ..................................................................... 10 4.6 Transactions subject and not subject to AML/CFT ..................................................................... 11 4.7 Professional vs personal real property transactions .................................................................. 12 4.8 Support and guidance on AML/CFT ................................................................................................ 13 5. Risk Assessment and Mitigation ............................................................................................................ 14 5.1 Statutory requirements under AML/CFT legislations ................................................................. 14 5.2 Sanctions for non-compliance ......................................................................................................... 14 5.3 ML/TF enterprise risk assessment .................................................................................................. 14 5.4 Difference between an inherent and residual enterprise risk assessment .......................... 15 5.5 How to conduct the ML/TF enterprise risk assessment ............................................................ 15 5.6 Quantitative and qualitative information for enterprise risk assessment ............................ 19 5.7 Example of an enterprise risk assessment template ................................................................. 19 6. AML/CFT Programme, Policies and Procedures ................................................................................ 23 6.1 Statutory requirements under AML/CFT legislations ................................................................. 23 6.2 Sanctions for non-compliance ......................................................................................................... 23 6.3 Role of senior management ............................................................................................................. 24 6.4 Compliance officer ............................................................................................................................. 24 2 | P a g e Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism Guidelines for Real Estate Agents (REAs) 6.5 Written policies and procedures..................................................................................................... 25 6.6 Group compliance .............................................................................................................................. 26 6.7 Staff vetting and employment ......................................................................................................... 26 6.8 AML/CFT training ................................................................................................................................ 26 6.9 Monitoring and review of AML/CFT programme .......................................................................... 27 6.10 Independent audit function ............................................................................................................. 27 7. Risk Based Customer Due Diligence (CDD) ............................................................................................ 29 7.1 Statutory requirements under AML/CFT legislations ................................................................. 29 7.2 Sanctions for non-compliance ......................................................................................................... 29 7.3 Who to conduct CDD on .................................................................................................................... 30 7.4 Timing of CDD ...................................................................................................................................... 30 7.5 CDD identification and verification ................................................................................................ 32 7.6 Verification using reliable and independent documents, data or information ................... 35 7.7 Purpose of real estate transaction or business relationship .................................................... 35 7.8 Identifying and verifying beneficial ownership ........................................................................... 36 7.9 Politically Exposed Person (PEP) .................................................................................................... 48 7.10 Source of wealth or funds ................................................................................................................ 52 7.11 Enterprise risk assessment and customer risk assessment ...................................................... 54 7.12 Customer risk assessment and rating ............................................................................................ 54 7.13 Three categories of CDD ................................................................................................................... 56 7.14 Simplified CDD ..................................................................................................................................... 56 7.15 Standard CDD ....................................................................................................................................... 57 7.16 Enhanced CDD ..................................................................................................................................... 57 7.17 Examples of standard and enhanced CDD .................................................................................... 58 7.18 Prohibited customers and risk screening ..................................................................................... 62 7.19 Delayed verification ........................................................................................................................... 63 7.20 Unable to complete CDD ................................................................................................................... 63 7.21 CDD and tipping off ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pulling Back from the Abyss Institute of Public Policy
    IPP’s Third Annual Report 2010 State of The Economy: Pulling Back From the Abyss Institute of Public Policy Beaconhouse National University Copyright© by Institute of Public Policy Beaconhouse National University No part of this report is to published without permission Published by Institute of Public Policy Beaconhouse National University Printed by Cross Media [email protected] | www.crossmedia9.com +92 (42) 661 0240 | +92 (333) 450 1684 III Institute of Public Policy Beaconhouse National University nstitutional Institutional backing is absolutely essential to policy makers of today, to guide their Iactions in promoting development and peace. These are times of change and challenge. There is a need for policy makers to base the policies on sound analytical work. Therefore, The Beaconhouse National University established the Institute of Public Policy as an independent, private sector think tank for research on economic, social, political and foreign policy issues. IPP's mission is to; "work in the areas of importance for improving the welfare of the citizenry. Its work will focus in particular on public policies in areas of economics, social and political development, as well as on foreign policy". Key activities of the Institution include: independent and objective analysis of the economy; strategic analysis of the concepts and doctrines in selected areas of public policy; research in the areas that are important for regional cooperation; conduct seminars and workshops to bring together policy makers, experts and other members; undertake funded research projects and disseminate research findings with the view to enhance public awareness and contribute to debate on issues of public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Information Document (PID)
    The World Bank Pakistan Revenue Mobilization Project (P165982) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Project Information Document (PID) Appraisal Stage | Date Prepared/Updated: 22-Apr-2019 | Report No: PIDA26212 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized April 19, 2019 Page 1 of 18 The World Bank Pakistan Revenue Mobilization Project (P165982) BASIC INFORMATION OPS_TABLE_BASIC_DATA A. Basic Project Data Country Project ID Project Name Parent Project ID (if any) Pakistan P165982 Pakistan Revenue Mobilization Project Region Estimated Appraisal Date Estimated Board Date Practice Area (Lead) SOUTH ASIA 11-Apr-2019 30-May-2019 Governance Financing Instrument Borrower(s) Implementing Agency Investment Project Financing Economic Affairs Division Federal Board of Revenue Proposed Development Objective(s) Contribute to a sustainable increase in domestic revenue by broadening the tax base and facilitating compliance Components Results-based component: This component includes four areas of objectives: 1. Simple & coherent tax system, 2. Control of taxpayer obligations, 3. Compliance facilitation, 4. Institutional development Traditional IPF component: Upgrade of FBR's ICT systems PROJECT FINANCING DATA (US$, Millions) SUMMARY-NewFin1 Total Project Cost 1,500.00 Total Financing 1,500.00 of which IBRD/IDA 400.00 Financing Gap 0.00 DETAILS-NewFinEnh1 World Bank Group Financing International Development Association (IDA) 400.00 IDA Credit 400.00 Non-World Bank Group Financing April 19, 2019 Page 2 of 18 The World Bank Pakistan Revenue Mobilization Project (P165982) Counterpart Funding 1,100.00 Borrower/Recipient 1,100.00 Environmental and Social Risk Classification Moderate Decision The review did authorize the team to appraise and negotiate Other Decision (as needed) B.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Report on the Accounts of Federal Board of Revenue (Inland Revenue) Audit Year 2013-2014
    AUDIT REPORT ON THE ACCOUNTS OF FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE (INLAND REVENUE) AUDIT YEAR 2013-2014 AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS i PREFACE v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii SUMMARY TABLES I Audit Work Statistics xi II Audit Observations Classified by Categories xi III Outcome Statistics xi IV Irregularities Pointed Out xii V Cost-Benefit xii CHAPTER-1 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ISSUES 1 CHAPTER-2 FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Comments on Budget & Accounts 8 2.3 Brief Comments on the Status of Compliance with PAC Directives 13 COMPLIANCE WITH AUTHORITY AUDIT (AUDIT PARAS) CHAPTER-3 NON PRODUCTION OF RECORD 15 CHAPTER-4 IRREGULARITIES AND NON COMPLIANCE 4.1 Sales Tax 21 4.2 Refund of Sales Tax 46 4.3 Federal Excise Duty 53 4.4 Income Tax 58 4.5 Refund of Income Tax 76 4.6 Workers Welfare Fund 78 4.7 Expenditure 80 CHAPTER-5 INTERNAL CONTROL WEAKNESSES 95 Annexure 1 MFDAC 107 Annexure 2 AUDIT IMPACT SUMMARY 132 Annexures PERTAINING TO AUDIT PARAS 133 (3-61) ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS AGP Auditor-General of Pakistan AGPR Accountant General Pakistan Revenue ADIA Additional Director Internal Audit AOP Association of Persons APPM Accounting Policies & Procedures Manual ATIR Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue ACIR Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue ACL Audit Command Language BCA Bank Credit Advice BOD Board of Directors BTB Broadening of Tax Base CAATs Computer Assisted Audit Techniques CAO Chief Accounts Officer CAP Collection Automation Process CBR Central Board of Revenue CGA Controller General
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan's Institutions
    Pakistan’s Institutions: Pakistan’s Pakistan’s Institutions: We Know They Matter, But How Can They We Know They Matter, But How Can They Work Better? Work They But How Can Matter, They Know We Work Better? Edited by Michael Kugelman and Ishrat Husain Pakistan’s Institutions: We Know They Matter, But How Can They Work Better? Edited by Michael Kugelman Ishrat Husain Pakistan’s Institutions: We Know They Matter, But How Can They Work Better? Essays by Madiha Afzal Ishrat Husain Waris Husain Adnan Q. Khan, Asim I. Khwaja, and Tiffany M. Simon Michael Kugelman Mehmood Mandviwalla Ahmed Bilal Mehboob Umar Saif Edited by Michael Kugelman Ishrat Husain ©2018 The Wilson Center www.wilsoncenter.org This publication marks a collaborative effort between the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars’ Asia Program and the Fellowship Fund for Pakistan. www.wilsoncenter.org/program/asia-program fffp.org.pk Asia Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 Cover: Parliament House Islamic Republic of Pakistan, © danishkhan, iStock THE WILSON CENTER, chartered by Congress as the official memorial to President Woodrow Wilson, is the nation’s key nonpartisan policy forum for tackling global issues through independent research and open dialogue to inform actionable ideas for Congress, the Administration, and the broader policy community. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publications and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • National Finance Commission Awards: a Challenge to Center Province Relations in Pakistan
    Journal of the Punjab University Historical Society Volume: 33, No. 02, July – December 2020 Rehana Saeed Hashmi * Aroosa Fatima** National Finance Commission Awards: A Challenge to Center Province Relations in Pakistan Abstract Timely and fair distribution of National Finance Commission award is not only essential for the survival of the federation, but it also strengthens the process of democratization. Historically, awards have not been regularly held on time and distributed at the expense of grave ethnic politics, party politics, unagreed formula of distribution, political instability and problematic center province relations. NFC is the constitutional body that is responsible for the distribution of resources and shares amongst the center and provinces. NFC is dealt under the Article 160 of the constitution 1973 that controls the resources, taxes, duties, or revenues in the “divisible pool”, which is to be further divided between the provinces upon an agreed formula. Unresolved financial matters within federations can instigate ethnic national tensions within state in the shape of intra provincial rivalry and resentments with the federation. NFC award holds a strategic importance and it should seldom postponed. Keywords: Centre-Province relations, federation, fiscal federalism, NFC, award distribution criteria, population, 18th Amendment Introduction The federal structure of Pakistan has been designed with strong central government in which the resources and functions are distributed among the federating units of country. Due to an ongoing perturbed mechanism of efficiency and distribution, there has been a long-standing debate on the share of resources between the federal government and federating units.1As per the actual division of finances and wealth, the federal government has practical hold in an unjust fiscal transfer to the provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Incidence of Indirect Taxation in Pakistan (1990 – 2001)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenGrey Repository Social Incidence of Indirect Taxation in Pakistan (1990 – 2001) Saadia Refaqat A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath Department of Economics and International Development April 2008 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. This thesis may be made available for consultation within the University Library and may be photocopied or lent to other libraries for the purposes of consultation. Singature: ______________________________________________________ I Table of Contents Table of Contents ..........................................................................................II List of Tables ........................................................................................... VI List of Figures .........................................................................................VIII Dedication ........................................................................................... IX Acknowledgments.........................................................................................X Abstract ..........................................................................................XII
    [Show full text]
  • Trade & Investment Guide
    HOW TO DO BUSINESS IN PAKISTAN? Trade & Investment Guide TRADE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF COMMERCE December, 2020 Disclaimer This booklet provides basic knowledge to potential investors and exporters. The aim of this guide is to highlight the striking features of Pakistan’s emerging economy, liberal investment regime, export potential, newly amended Companies law (2017), revised Corporate tax legislation and initiatives/incentives introduced by Government of Pakistan for entrepreneurs and exporters. Information and statistics used are correct as of November 2020 and may be subject to change. For detailed and updated information regarding doing business in Pakistan, readers are advised to visit the official site of the concerned authorities. For any query or feedback regarding this document please contact at: Ms. Mehrun-Nisa Research Associate Trade Development Authority of Pakistan [email protected] ~ ii ~ Table of Contents Pakistan: In General .................................................................................. 1 Geography and Connectivity ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Demography ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Language ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Terms of Reference for a Review of Tax Administration in the Pakistan
    ANNEX 2: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WORK Terms of Reference For a Review of Tax Administration in the Pakistan Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) I. Background Pakistan’s tax system has undergone significant reforms over the last two decades, leading to the modernization of direct and indirect taxes. More recent times have seen the rationalization of income tax rates, the introduction of self-assessment for filing income taxes, some expansion of consumption taxes, and the rationalization of the customs tariff structure with a reduction of tariff bands and maximum rates. Currently, the FBR is engaged in a comprehensive plan to re-structure and modernize the entire tax administration and customs operations. In addition, the FBR has taken a number of steps in the recent past to increase the number of taxpayers and broaden tax bases. However, Pakistan’s tax system continues to under-perform in some fundamental ways, in particular in its ability to raise adequate revenues, mainly because the bases of the most important taxes, personal and corporate income taxes and the General Sales Tax (GST), continue to be very narrow and the level of tax evasion remains quite high. In fact, the tax to GDP ratio has declined in recent times. On the other hand, most of the macroeconomic fiscal adjustment in recent years has been on the expenditure side of the budget. Some expenditure items such as defense spending tend to be higher in Pakistan than in other countries, but these are unlikely to change. At the same time, the country’s needs for spending on social services, such as education and health, and capital infrastructure are likely to increase in the near future as the Government pursues a strategy of sustained economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Board of Revenue Anti-Money Laundering And
    FBR AML/CFT Guidelines for Dealers in Precious Metals and Stones (DPMS) Federal Board of Revenue Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism Guidelines for Dealers in Precious Metals and Stones January 2021 1 | P a g e FBR AML/CFT Guidelines for Dealers in Precious Metals and Stones (DPMS) Table of Contents Acronyms/terms ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Target audience .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Scope and terminology ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Structure ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2. Background .................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Why are DPMS required to comply with AML / CFT? .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Agricultural Investment Country Profile Pakistan
    Foreign Agricultural Investment Country Profile Pakistan REGION South Asia INCOME GROUP Lower middle income POPULATION 184 million 2 TOTAL AREA 796 095 km CAPITAL Islamabad LARGEST CITY Karachi GNI PER CAPITA US$1 000 OFFICIAL LANGUAGE English, Urdu MAJOR EXPORTS textiles, rice, leather goods, sports goods, MAJOR IMPORTS petroleum, petroleum products, machinery, plastics, transportation equipment, edible oils, paper and paperboard, iron and steel, tea. FAO Investment Policy Support FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT PROFILE Pakistan PAGE ii The information and data in this information product are based solely upon information and data publicly available from international organizations, regional organizations, national governments and other sources. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) declines all responsibility for errors and deficiencies in the information product. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. All rights reserved. FAO encourages the reproduction and dissemination of material in
    [Show full text]
  • TARP Tax Administration Reform Project TFC Taxpayer Facilitation Center TTL Task Team Leader UNDB United Nations Development Business VAT Value Added Tax
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR00002147 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IBRD-72640 IDA-40070 TF-54392) ON A CREDIT Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 53.3 MILLION (US$78.5 MILLION EQUIVALENT) A LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 24.4 MILLION AND A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF GBP 12.152 MILLION TO THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN FOR A Public Disclosure Authorized TAX ADMINISTRATION REFORM PROJECT June 25, 2012 Governance and Public Sector Management Unit South Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Exchange Rate in original PAD Currency Unit = Pakistani Rupee (PKR) PKR 1.00 = US$ 0.016 US$ 1.00 = PKR 61.05 Exchange Rate Effective May 15, 2012 US$ 1.00 = PKR 90.87 FISCAL YEAR July 1 – June 30 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADR Alternate Dispute Resolution APL Adaptable Program Loan ATL Active Taxpayers List BS Basic-pay Scale CAS Country Assistance Strategy CBR Central Board of Revenue CCFR Cabinet Committee for Finance and Revenue CEG Customs and Excises Tax Group CPS Country Partnership Strategy DCA Development Credit Agreement DFID Department for International Development (UK) DLI Disbursement Linked Indicator DPL Development Policy Loan EAP East Asia and Pacific Region ECA Europe and Central Asia Region EMP Environmental Management Plan ERR Economic Rate of Return ERS Expeditious Refund System FATE Facilitation and Taxpayer Education FBR Federal Board of Revenue FM Financial Management FMR Financial Monitoring Report FRR Financial Rate of Return GDP Gross Domestic
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Tax Expenditures in Pakistan
    87103 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Study on Tax Expenditures in Pakistan Ather Maqsood Ahmed and Robina Ather Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized World Bank Policy Paper Series on Pakistan PK 21/12 January 2014 _______________________________________________ This publication is a product of the South Asia Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit. It is part of a larger effort by the World Bank to provide open access to its research and make a contribution to development policy discussions in Pakistan and around the world. Policy Working Papers are also posted on the Web at http://econ.worldbank.org. The authors may be contacted at [email protected] Abstract The paper provides a detailed assessment of tax expenditures in Pakistan, including an appropriate definition, framework and a methodology for measuring tax expenditures. The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Study on Tax Expenditures in Pakistan Ather Maqsood Ahmed and Robina Ather The authors would like to thank the World Bank for commissioning this study.
    [Show full text]