Front Matter Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Front Matter Template Copyright by Cristina Salinas 2011 The Dissertation Committee for Cristina Salinas Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Contesting Mobility: Growers, Farm Workers, and U.S.-Mexico Border Enforcement During the Twentieth Century Committee: Laurie B. Green, Co-Supervisor Emilio Zamora, Co-Supervisor José E. Limón James Sidbury Anne M. Martínez Contesting Mobility: Growers, Farm Workers, and U.S.-Mexico Border Enforcement During the Twentieth Century by Cristina Salinas, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2011 Dedication To my parents, Delia Becerra Salinas and Armando Salinas Jr., for their devotion to family and community. To my husband, Marcel Rodriguez, for his boundless support and love. Acknowledgements This final stage of dissertation writing has crystallized two important truths for me: many people’s efforts and passions have gone into the making of this project; and two, I have benefited greatly from wonderful friends, family, and colleagues. I would like to begin by acknowledging the institutional support I have received that allowed me to complete my dissertation. The Clara Driscoll Fellowship awarded to me by the department of history at the University of Texas at Austin provided funding for research trips to Mexico City and Washington, D.C. Graduate coordinators Mary Helen Quinn and Marilyn Lehman provided much-needed guidance through the often- bewildering UT bureaucracy. The Center for Mexican American Studies has been a crucial space of support and community formation at the University of Texas. I especially want to acknowledge José E. Limón, Dolores Garcia, Luis Guevara, and Domino Perez for their support. The dissertation fellowship I received from the Center during my final year made it possible for me to stay in school and finish writing. A summer fellowship from Texas State University in San Marcos just after I advanced to candidacy allowed me to develop my dissertation research plan. For me it was important that my dissertation committee be composed of scholars whose work was admirable, but who were also admirable people. The members of my committee were extraordinarily generous with their time and their support. José E. Limón and Anne Martínez gave me substantial feedback, providing fruitful avenues to advance my project. I want to particularly acknowledge James Sidbury. From the very first historiography course I took with him early in my graduate career, he impressed me as my model scholar and intellectual. He has since served on my exam and dissertation v committee and has greatly shaped my work. I could not have asked for more committed and generous mentors than my co-advisers Emilio Zamora and Laurie B. Green. Emilio has always encouraged me and carefully read every chapter of my dissertation to make sure I produced my best work. He has also encouraged me to think about the value of my work to the communities I represent. Laurie has been absolutely crucial to my development as a scholar and to the completion of this dissertation. She has been there from each chapter’s earliest stages of conceptualization, to their finish. She has pushed me to deepen my analyses and broaden my thinking. Because of her committed mentorship, I am prepared for the next stage in my career. I have been fortunate to be part of a large, diverse, and interconnected graduate student community at UT. I have shared so much with my companions over the years: fun and memorable days and nights, shared political work, collective intellectual projects, and moments of difficulty and struggle, that many of them have become like family. I want to acknowledge the work of the Advanced Seminar in Chicano/a Research, particularly Manuel Callahan, Luis Alvarez, Steve Azcona, Emmet Campos, Rebecca Gamez, Alan Gomez, Pablo Gonzalez, Veronica Martínez, Toni Nelson Herrera, Isabella Quintana, Russell Rodriguez, Gilbert Rosas, Lilia Rosas, and Geoff Valdes. Our work on collective mentorship and collective forms of knowledge production has given me hope for the possibilities in academia. I would also like to recognize other past and present members of the CMAS community: Alex Chavez, Jackie Cuevas, Christina Garcia, Irene Garza, and Brenda Sendejo. Many thanks to the Happy Hour crew of Santiago Guerra, Crystal Kurzen, Nancy Rios, and Teresa Velasquez. Thanks also to Melissa Forbis, Bianca Flores, and Eddie Campos. vi I wish to acknowledge the dissertation-writing group whose members have read, and provided valuable feedback on all my chapters: Sarah Steinbock-Pratt, Kyle Shelton, Deirdre Doughty, Eric Bush, Erica Whittington, and Leah Deane. I want to especially thank Leah for being my writing buddy. Sitting together every day at the Benson has mitigated a lot of the loneliness of the writing process. I do not even want to imagine what graduate school would have been like without Las Girlfriends: Olga Herrera, Veronica Martínez, Jennifer Najera, Laura Padilla, Isabella Quintana, and Virginia Raymond. These women have been truly great friends, sharing the best and most difficult times of my life. Our friendships have deepened over the years despite being scattered all over the country. Thanks also to Tom Kolker and Michael Matsuda. I especially have to thank Veronica Martínez. I can honestly say that there is no way I would have made it through graduate school without her. We started graduate school in the same cohort, and she reached out to a very shy and intimidated new graduate student. Over the years I have relied on her for friendship and almost daily advice. She has been a fiercely loyal and generous friend, and has become a like a sister to me. I would like to acknowledge my friends and colleagues at the Llano Grande Center for Research and Development whose work transforming public education through youth empowerment has been an inspiration to me: Edyael Casaperalta, Olga Cardoso, Francisco Guajardo, Miguel Guajardo, Juan Ozuna, and Delia Perez. I would especially like to acknowledge Francisco Guajardo for his caring mentorship since I was a high school student at Edcouch-Elsa High School. My family has always been my deepest source of inspiration. I want to thank los Rodriguez, for their good wishes and support. My father and mother-in-law Cecilio and Becky Rodriguez welcomed me into their family as a daughter. Angela, Cecil, Robert, vii Patty, John, Lizzie, David, Becca, and Tina have made holidays in San Antonio so enjoyable, and thanks as well to Connie, Grace, and Mari for being part of the sister-in- law crew. The histories of my parents’ families has animated this entire project. Los Becerra and los Salinas have lived in the frontera, on both sides, for many generations, and it is that experience I sought to capture in this dissertation. I thank all my family for their support, especially Manuela, Eloisa, Francisca, and Marco. I thank my brothers Orlando and Carlos for their steadfast love and friendship. Thanks also go out to Sandy, Jennifer, Adrian, Lucien, and Amelia for the delight they bring to my life. My parents, Armando and Delia Salinas have provided such strong support and love, that it has allowed me to carry on with this endeavor over the years. My husband Marcel Rodriguez has shared this journey with me from the very beginning. Neither of us knew just what we were getting into when I began graduate school, but he continued to believe in me and believe that I would succeed. He has made many sacrifices, great and small, to ensure that I would complete my degree. He spent many late nights at the library with me during this last year of writing, so that I would not be working alone. He has been a partner in this process in every way and I cannot thank him enough for his love and support. viii Contesting Mobility: Growers, Farm Workers, and U.S.-Mexico Border Enforcement During the Twentieth Century Cristina Salinas, PhD. The University of Texas at Austin, 2011 Supervisors: Laurie B. Green, Emilio Zamora This dissertation examines an important, but understudied period in Mexican-U.S. migration history during the 1940s and early 1950s. The joint introduction and sanctioning, by the U.S. and Mexican governments, of the bracero program also initiated a large illegal migration of agricultural workers to the United States. This was a period characterized by high levels of temporary legal migration and illegal migration, as well as intense levels of immigration enforcement. These simultaneous processes confound a simplistic view of U.S. history as a sequence of alternating periods of immigration expansion and restriction. U.S. immigration law and policy does not resemble a pendulum swinging first one way then the other; rather, both expansion and restriction characterized the 1940s and early 1950s. This study focuses on South Texas and El Paso, both border regions with dominant agricultural economies as well as a significant presence of Border Patrol officers. By focusing on these border regions, this dissertation examines the relationship between immigration laws and policy and the agricultural labor relations between growers and workers on the ground. This dissertation is concerned with state formation on the U.S.-Mexico border, and its relationship with labor mobility. The process of state and border formation did not originate in the central seats of federal authority, Washington, D.C., and Mexico City, to ix be applied and exerted on the furthest reaches of their territories. Growers and workers created, negotiated, and experienced and challenged the power and meaning of the border in the agricultural fields during daily interactions. Individual Border Patrolman made the border every day in the choices they made about where and where not to patrol, and which friendships to make and maintain.
Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Ralph
    University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Ralph H. Records Collection Records, Ralph Hayden. Papers, 1871–1968. 2 feet. Professor. Magazine and journal articles (1946–1968) regarding historiography, along with a typewritten manuscript (1871–1899) by L. S. Records, entitled “The Recollections of a Cowboy of the Seventies and Eighties,” regarding the lives of cowboys and ranchers in frontier-era Kansas and in the Cherokee Strip of Oklahoma Territory, including a detailed account of Records’s participation in the land run of 1893. ___________________ Box 1 Folder 1: Beyond The American Revolutionary War, articles and excerpts from the following: Wilbur C. Abbott, Charles Francis Adams, Randolph Greenfields Adams, Charles M. Andrews, T. Jefferson Coolidge, Jr., Thomas Anburey, Clarence Walroth Alvord, C.E. Ayres, Robert E. Brown, Fred C. Bruhns, Charles A. Beard and Mary R. Beard, Benjamin Franklin, Carl Lotus Belcher, Henry Belcher, Adolph B. Benson, S.L. Blake, Charles Knowles Bolton, Catherine Drinker Bowen, Julian P. Boyd, Carl and Jessica Bridenbaugh, Sanborn C. Brown, William Hand Browne, Jane Bryce, Edmund C. Burnett, Alice M. Baldwin, Viola F. Barnes, Jacques Barzun, Carl Lotus Becker, Ruth Benedict, Charles Borgeaud, Crane Brinton, Roger Butterfield, Edwin L. Bynner, Carl Bridenbaugh Folder 2: Douglas Campbell, A.F. Pollard, G.G. Coulton, Clarence Edwin Carter, Harry J. Armen and Rexford G. Tugwell, Edward S. Corwin, R. Coupland, Earl of Cromer, Harr Alonzo Cushing, Marquis De Shastelluz, Zechariah Chafee, Jr. Mellen Chamberlain, Dora Mae Clark, Felix S. Cohen, Verner W. Crane, Thomas Carlyle, Thomas Cromwell, Arthur yon Cross, Nellis M. Crouso, Russell Davenport Wallace Evan Daview, Katherine B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Journal of Massachusetts
    The Historical Journal of Massachusetts “Boston’s New Immigrants and New Economy, 1965-2015.” Author: Marilynn S. Johnson Source: Historical Journal of Massachusetts, Volume 46, No. 2, Summer 2018, pp. 2-37. Published by: Institute for Massachusetts Studies and Westfield State University You may use content in this archive for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the Historical Journal of Massachusetts regarding any further use of this work: [email protected] Funding for digitization of issues was provided through a generous grant from MassHumanities. Some digitized versions of the articles have been reformatted from their original, published appearance. When citing, please give the original print source (volume/number/date) but add "retrieved from HJM's online archive at http://www.westfield.ma.edu/historical-journal/. 2 Historical Journal of Massachusetts • Summer 2018 Reproduced with permission of the University of Massachusetts Press 3 EDITOR’S CHOICE Boston's New Immigrants and New Economy, 1965-2015 MARILYNN S. JOHNSON Editor's Introduction: HJM is proud to select as our Editor’s Choice Award for this issue Marilynn S. Johnson’s superb study, The New Bostonians: How Immigrants Have Transformed the Metro Area since the 1960s, published by the University of Massachusetts Press in 2015. After World War II, the greater Boston area experienced dramatic economic and demographic decline. The population plummeted from 801,444 in 1950 to 641,071 in 1970, a 20% drop. Since the 1980s, however, the city has witnessed a renaissance, a phenomenon similar to what has occurred in many other major urban areas. Marilynn S. Johnson argues that immigrants have contributed to this renaissance in numerous yet often overlooked ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Bailyn, W
    Acad. Quest. (2021) 34.1 10.51845/34s.1.24 DOI 10.51845/34s.1.24 Reviews He won the Pulitzer Prize in history twice: in 1968 for The Ideological Illuminating History: A Retrospective Origins of the American Revolution of Seven Decades, Bernard Bailyn, W. and in 1987 for Voyagers to the West, W. Norton & Company, 2020, 270 pp., one of several volumes he devoted $28.95 hardbound. to the rising field of Atlantic history. Though Bailyn illuminated better than most scholars the contours of Bernard Bailyn: An seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Historian to Learn From American history, his final book hints at his growing concern about the Robert L. Paquette rampant opportunism and pernicious theoretical faddishness that was corrupting the discipline he loved and to which he had committed his Bernard Bailyn died at the age professional life. of ninety-seven, four months after Illuminating History consists of publication of this captivating curio five chapters. Each serves as kind of of a book, part autobiography, part a scenic overlook during episodes meditation, part history, and part of a lengthy intellectual journey. historiography. Once discharged At each stop, Bailyn brings to the from the army at the end of World fore little known documents or an War II and settled into the discipline obscure person’s life to open up of history at Harvard University, views into a larger, more complicated Bailyn undertook an ambitious quest universe, which he had tackled to understand nothing less than with greater depth and detail in the structures, forces, and ideas previously published books and that ushered in the modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews and Book Notes
    BOOK REVIEWS AND BOOK NOTES EDITED BY NORMAN B. WILKINSON Essays In American Colonial History. Edited by Paul Goodman. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1967. Pp. 632. $5.95. Paper- back.) This collection of thirty-two papers is designed to "make more readily available studies of America's colonial period that have appeared as essays in scholarly journals." The articles are concise reports of investigations, many of which have been elaborated in books, and thus they comprise a convenient, brief introduction to the scholarship of America's formative years. Each of the interpretive essays is the work of a distinguished his- torian and each makes a useful contribution to our grasp of colonial history. Taken together they provide a single overall theme: that even before American independence, a sense of American nationality, of "Amer- icanness," had emerged from the clash of the Old World patterns of living and thinking, and the New World environment had prompted men from both continents to think of Americans as a "new race of men" in an indigenous secular culture. The book is divided into three sections. Part I considers the sources and methods of European expansion, especially the origin of England's thrust across the Atlantic. A. L. Rowse, Lawrence Stone and Michael Walzer write persuasively on the essential preconditions for Tudor-Stuart coloniza- tion. They see these in the development of a powerful and highly centralized nation in place of a fragmented and unstable medieval polity; the failure of English mercantilism; and the emergence of a revolutionary Puritan move- ment that discovered its perfect setting in the New World.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Immigration to America, 1630 to 1921 by Dr
    Irish Immigration to America, 1630 to 1921 By Dr. Catherine B. Shannon Reprinted courtesy of the New Bedford Whaling Museum Introduction The oft quoted aphorism that "Boston is the next parish to Galway" highlights the long and close connections between Ireland and New England that extend as far back as the 1600s. Colonial birth, death, marriage, and some shipping records cite the presence of Irish born people as early as the 1630s. For instance, in 1655 the ship Goodfellow arrived in Boston carrying a group of indentured servants, and John Hancock's ancestor, Anthony Hancock, arrived from Co. Down in 1681. According to the story of The Irish Gift of 1676, which provided aid after King Phillip's War, Rev. Cotton Mather and Governor Winthrop corresponded with their Irish friends and relatives, with as many as 105 soldiers of Irish origin serving in various militias during the war. However, up until 1715, the numbers of Irish in New England were less than 1%, a small percentage of the population.1 The First Wave of Irish Immigration, 1715 to 1845 The first significant influx of Irish immigrants to Boston and New England consisted primarily of Ulster Presbyterians and began in the early eighteenth century.2 They comprised about ten percent, or 20,000 of a larger migration of over 200,000 Ulster Presbyterians who fled the north of Ireland to America between 1700 and 1775. The majority arrived in Boston between 1714 and 1750, as most Ulster immigrants went to the mid-Atlantic area via Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Charleston beginning in the 1750s.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration and Group Relations
    Hoover Press : Thernstrom DP5 HPTHER0200 08-01-01 rev1 page37 Immigration and Group Relations REED UEDA the united states is the prototype of a country built by immigration and assimilation. The blurring of ethnic lines through the process of assimilation has promoted equality of economic opportunity and produced a cultural life open to popular participation and relatively free of constraints imposed by group membership.1 African Americans are the obvious exception to this pattern, since their ancestors came as slaves, not as “immigrants”—as the word is customarily used—and they are not a subject in this essay. Those who arrived as newcomers on the American shore were thrown into a “melting pot,” almost every scholar once assumed. It was much too simple a notion. Many immigrants joined the mainstream while preserving much of their own ethnic culture. In fact, American liberty has allowed precisely that process of preservation. Freedom and tolerance have per- mitted religious and cultural minorities who were marginalized or perse- cuted in their homelands to maintain a distinctive way of life free from fear. The consequence of limited government has been an extraordinarily strong civil society within which groups have organized on their own Hoover Press : Thernstrom DP5 HPTHER0200 08-01-01 rev1 page38 38 Reed Ueda terms.2 Widespread assimilation is thus coupled with a vibrant ethnic pluralism. American society resembles a simmering stewpot of gradually blending fragments; no crucible immediately melted newcomers into ho- mogeneous Anglo-conformity. But collective ethnic identity has never been a self-evident and per- manent “given”; it has required much energy to sustain.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Minds: Transnational Nationalism and the Transformation of South Slavic Immigrant Identity in Chicago, 1890-1941
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations (1 year embargo) 2012 Balkan Minds: Transnational Nationalism and the Transformation of South Slavic Immigrant Identity in Chicago, 1890-1941 Dejan Kralj Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss_1yr Part of the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Kralj, Dejan, "Balkan Minds: Transnational Nationalism and the Transformation of South Slavic Immigrant Identity in Chicago, 1890-1941" (2012). Dissertations (1 year embargo). 4. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss_1yr/4 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations (1 year embargo) by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2012 Dejan Kralj LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO BALKAN MINDS: TRANSNATIONAL NATIONALISM & THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOUTH SLAVIC IMMIGRANT IDENTITY IN CHICAGO, 1890-1941 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN HISTORY BY DEJAN KRALJ CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2012 Copyright by Dejan Kralj, 2012 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is quite a difficult task to thank everyone that has helped me throughout this epic scholarly journey. However, many deserve recognition for the roles they played guiding me through to the end of my graduate career. Foremost in mind, I must thank Lillian Hardison, the heart and soul of the history graduate department at Loyola. Your support and friendship have meant the world to me and countless other graduate students that have made their way through the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpt from American Studies in China •fi •Œpart IV. Thirty Years of Research in American History in Chinaâ•Š
    Selections from American Studies in China, edited by Priscilla Roberts and forthcoming on the US‐China Education Trust website (http://www.uscet.net/template/index.cfm). Part IV. Thirty Years of Research in American History in China American history research is a relatively young discipline in China. Although in practice Chinese studies of American history began rather early, in the first half of the twentieth century, at that time most publications in American history were edited or translated works. After 1949, Chinese academic historians began to place greater importance on studying foreign historians, and a number of compilations on American history were published. Since 1978, with the implementation of the reform and opening-up policies in Mainland China, the study of American history, like other disciplines, has experienced unprecedented development. In the last thirty years, research in American history has become a field for serious academic study, as it has gradually escaped from the dominance of political ideology, and publications in this field have gone beyond translations and compilations. I. Trends and Achievements The turning point for American history research in China occurred between 1978 and 1979, when two major events provided new opportunities to develop research in American history. Firstly, with the implementation of the reform and opening up policy, China became ever more tolerant politically and witnessed a liberation movement in political and academic thinking. Taking advantage of this favorable development, research in American history entered a new era of rapid development. Secondly, the establishment of diplomatic relations between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the United States in 1979 brought an end to years of hostility and isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus for M.A. in History
    Department of History The University of Burdwan Syllabus for the Degree of M A in History to be effective from the academic session 2014-16 Preamble: The entire syllabus shall be of 90 credits carrying 900 marks, of which 10 credits carrying 100 marks shall be allotted to Project Work. The syllabus is divided into 17 courses of which 16 courses are of 50 marks each and one course, i.e., project work is of 100 marks. Each course of 50 marks is of 5 credits (1 credit = 1 lecture of 1 hour per week x 16). A candidate has to earn total 90 credits to earn PG degree in History. Each course of 5 credits shall have 5 hour session of Lectures per week over a period of one semester of 16 weeks for teaching-learning process. The 90 credits carrying 900 marks shall be divided into four Semesters. Each of the first three Semesters shall be of four courses carrying 20 credits (5 credits for each course) and 200 marks (160 marks for End Semester Examination and 40 marks for Continuous Assessment). Fourth Semester shall be of five courses carrying 30 credits (20 credits from four courses and 10 credits from project work) and 300 marks (160 marks for End Semester Examination, 40 for Continuous Assessment and 100 marks for Project Work). The syllabus contains mainly two types of courses ----- Core and Elective. A course which should compulsorily be studied by a candidate as a core-requirement is termed as a Core course. The Core courses are compulsory for the students.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives in American History
    Perspectives in American History VOLUME II · 1968 PUBLISHED BY THE Charles Warren Center for Studies ·in A1nerican History HARVARD UNIVERSITY Perspectives in A111erica11 History, an annual review published by the Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History and edited by Donald Fleming and Bernard Bailyn, is devoted to Am.erican history from. the age of discoveries to the present. Each issue is a substantial volume-consisting either of a small number of monographs or of a group of essays on a unified them.e. When space permits, review essays are included on important publications in the field of American history. American history is defmed broadly to include the history of litera­ ture, science, philosophy, the arts, economics, and demography as well as the n1orc usual subjects. Particular ini.portancc is attached to the com­ parative history of Europe and America and to the contacts between America and the rest of the world. Throughout, the effort is made to open new areas of American his­ tory to investigation, to suggest new viewpoints and new approaches, and to pose new questions. Perspectives IS SOLD ONLY IN ADVANCE OF PUBLICATION. Checks, payable to Harvard University, must accompany subscriptions. They should be mailed to the Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History, 53 Church Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138. The price of individual issues is $5.00. Five-year subscriptions are $22.00. Perspectives in American History VOLUME II · 1968 THE INTELLECTUAL MIGRATION: EUROPE AND AMERICA, 1930-19 60 The second issue of Perspectives in American History will contain a collec­ tion of essays and memoirs dealing with the effect on American intellec­ tual and cultural life of the migration to America ofleading European intellectuals, scholars, and artists during the Hitler years.
    [Show full text]
  • Oscar Handlin Was Spread Upon the Permanent Records of the Faculty
    At a meeting of the FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES on March 6, 2012, the following tribute to the life and service of the late Oscar Handlin was spread upon the permanent records of the Faculty. OSCAR HANDLIN BORN: September 29, 1915 DIED: September 20, 2011 Oscar Handlin, Carl M. Loeb University Professor, Emeritus, was the most influential and creative historian of American social life in the second half of the twentieth century. Born in Brooklyn, New York, the son of Russian Jewish immigrants, steeped in the lore and learning of Jewish culture, he developed in his youngest years a passion for learning—learning, as he wrote again and again, for its own sake, simply to know and understand the world and its people. It was that passion that led him into and out of a Yeshiva in Brooklyn, through his studies at Brooklyn College, through years of encyclopedic reading in the Brooklyn and New York Public Libraries, and that led him finally to Harvard, which he considered the national citadel of learning. He entered the Harvard graduate school in 1934, at age 18, and after receiving his doctorate under the direction of Professor Arthur Schlesinger, Sr., in 1940, except for two years of teaching in Brooklyn, he taught at Harvard until his retirement. It is an indication of the early recognition of his talents that his first appointment at Harvard (1945) was as Instructor, then Assistant Professor in Social Science, approved by the History, Psychology, and Sociology Departments. By then the publication in 1941 of his dissertation on Boston’s immigrants, 1790-1865, had begun a stream of writings—at least forty books written or edited and innumerable articles and reviews—that lasted for over four decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Notes for Toward Democracy
    NOTES TO INTRODUCTION 1 EXTENDED NOTES FOR TOWARD DEMOCRACY Note to Readers The following notes, prepared with the help of Abigail Modaff of Harvard University, contain fuller documentation for James T. Kloppenberg, Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought, published by Oxford University Press in June, 2016. Page references within these notes refer to the print version of the book. As is indicated on p. 711 of that edition, many of the notes in this document contain a greater range of references and commentary than are available in the book. Readers will, however, find that a few of the notes that are followed by an asterisk in the print version do not differ from the notes in this document; those asterisks will be removed, and typographical errors corrected, in later printings of Toward Democracy. Introduction 1. See the UNESCO report edited by Richard McKeon, Democracy in a World of Tensions (Chicago, 1951), 522. Influential assessments of the universality of democracy at the turn of the twenty-first century include Amartya Sen, “Democracy as a Universal Value,” Journal of Democracy 10 (1999): 3–17; and the widely circulated report by Freedom House, Democracy’s Century: A Survey of Political Change in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1999), which reported that the number of democratic nations had mushroomed from a mere handful in 1900 to over 60 percent by the end of the century. Although those nations contained less than 40 percent of the world’s population, the report confidently predicted that the further expansion of democracy, now praised if not NOTES TO INTRODUCTION 2 yet practiced everywhere, was only a matter of time.
    [Show full text]