DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing the Remaining Service Life of the T-34C Aircraft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing the Remaining Service Life of the T-34C Aircraft University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2005 Managing the Remaining Service Life of the T-34C Aircraft John Howard Rousseau University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Rousseau, John Howard, "Managing the Remaining Service Life of the T-34C Aircraft. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2005. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2288 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by John Howard Rousseau entitled "Managing the Remaining Service Life of the T-34C Aircraft." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. R. B. Richards, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Ralph Kimberlin, George Masters Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by John Howard Rousseau entitled “Managing the Remaining Service Life of the T-34C Aircraft.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. R. B. Richards Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Ralph Kimberlin George Masters Accepted for the Council: Anne Mayhew Vice Chancellor and Dean of Graduate Studies (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) MANAGING THE REMAINING SERVICE LIFE OF THE T-34C AIRCRAFT A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville John Howard Rousseau December 2005 DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my wife Kimberley Adair, whose love, support, and faith have been instrumental in my life and critical to any success I have experienced. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to offer my sincere gratitude to the faculty and staff at the University of Tennessee Space Institute and the United States Test Pilot School for their help in pursuit of this degree. I would like to thank the T-34C and T-6A teams at NAVAIR and PMA-273 for their dedication to our country. Their work has a direct impact on the safety and success of Naval Aviation on a daily basis. To my parents, Howard and Carol Rousseau, I cannot adequately express my appreciation for their guidance throughout my life. Lastly, I would like to thank my children Regan Elizabeth, Jack Emory and Grant Andrew who make every day a joy and a blessing. iii ABSTRACT The T-34C Airplane has been the primary trainer aircraft of the United States Navy for more than twenty-five years and is reaching the end of its service life. The Navy has delayed the procurement of the replacement T-6A Texan II aircraft for five years, yet does not expect the future training requirements to diminish. This delay in T-6A procurement along with recent observed increases in primary trainer aircraft usage have resulted in the need for the Navy to pay considerable attention to the remaining service life of the T-34C aircraft. This thesis will discuss the methodology used to determine future primary trainer aircraft requirements and projected aircraft availability. With analysis of these results it is the author’s opinion that there will be a projected shortage of over 60 primary trainer aircraft in the coming years. In order to alleviate that shortfall a Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) is recommended for the T-34C aircraft. In support of a SLEP for the T-34C aircraft it is recommended that the main wing spars and carry through structure be replaced instead of conducting a time consuming and costly Damage Tolerance Analysis (DTA) on those components. Replacement of these parts and an increased inspection interval on other airframe components on sixty-three aircraft will alleviate the projected shortfall until the T-6A is delivered in sufficient numbers to maintain the primary training requirement of our future Naval Aviators. iv PREFACE A portion of the information contained within this thesis was obtained from a Naval Air Systems Command sponsored program from the Raytheon Aircraft Company. Some of these data are derived from a proprietary algorithm so only the data will be discussed and not the methodology used to obtain it. The research, discussion, conclusions, and recommendations presented are the opinions of the author and should not be construed as an official opinion of the United States Department of Defense, the United States Navy, the Naval Air Systems Command, the Naval Undergraduate Flight Training Systems program office, or the Raytheon Aircraft Company. v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM...................................................................... 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE T-34C AIRPLANE .......................................................5 DESCRIPTION OF THE T-6A AIRPLANE ......................................................... 7 DESCRIPTION OF PRIMARY PILOT FLIGHT TRAINING ............................. 8 CHAPTER II. PRIMARY TRAINER TRANSITION PLANNING .......................... 9 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................9 CNATRA PRIMARY TRAINER REQUIREMENTS ........................................10 T-6A BUY AND DELIVERY SCHEDULE.........................................................11 T-34C AVAILABILITY ......................................................................................12 FATIGUE LIFE EXPENDED.................................................................. 12 FAST REPORT DATA ............................................................................ 14 INCREASED FLE USAGE RATES........................................................ 16 CHAPTER III. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS .............................................................18 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................18 ACCELERATE PURCHASE AND DELIVERY OF T-6A ................................ 20 REDUCE T-34C FLE ACCRURAL RATE......................................................... 21 CNATRA USE OF SATELITE SITE T-34C AIRPLANES ................................23 T-34C FLE EXTENSION THROUGH SLEP...................................................... 24 CHAPTER IV. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF T-34C SLEP ..........................27 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 27 SAFE LIFE ............................................................................................... 27 FAIL SAFE ...............................................................................................29 DAMAGE TOLERANT........................................................................... 29 PROPOSED SLEP METHODOLOGY.................................................................30 ORIGINAL T-34C FATIGUE TESTING ................................................31 SLAP .........................................................................................................31 PLAN FORWARD ................................................................................... 32 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING................................................................. 34 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................36 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................36 RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................... 36 vi REFERENCES ................................................................................................................38 APPENDICES................................................................................................................. 40 APPENDIX A: FIGURES ....................................................................................41 APPENDIX B: TABLES...................................................................................... 48 VITA................................................................................................................................. 52 vii LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: T-34C Cost Per Flight Hour and RFT Rates ....................................................7 TABLE 2: Projected Navy T-6A Delivery Schedule and Availability............................ 11 TABLE 3: CNATRA Projected T-34C Availability ....................................................... 15 TABLE 4: T-6A Historic Unit Cost................................................................................. 20 TABLE B-1: CNATRA Projected Flight Hour
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3 Change of Command of Blacklions
    CHANGE OF COMMAND Mark Fox. Following his Aide tour, he XO CDR Theresa Kaylor and PAO OF BLACKLIONS attended the Naval War College in LT Brian Weingart are leaving the Newport, RI where he graduated with ship. distinction. CDR Pinckney then reported to the “Swordsmen” of VFA-32 in NAS Oceana, VA. While with the “Swords- men”, he served as the Administration Officer, Maintenance Officer, and Op- erations Officer. He deployed to the USS CARTER HALL (LSD-50) CENTCOM AOR aboard USS HARRY CO: CDR LaDonna M. Simpson S. TRUMAN (CVN 75) from Sept 2013 XO: CDR Brad A. Fancher – April 2014 in support of Operation CMC: CMDCM Adam Singleton Enduring Freedom. During his tour, he Pat Robson, Liaison earned his CDO (underway), Air Wing Mission Commander, and Air Wing Greetings from the FIGHTIN 5-0! Rescue Mission Commander qualifica- There is no better way than under- tions. way! The CARTER HALL and crew In December 2015, CDR Pinckney have enjoyed being back on the open reported to US European Command in water, training, preparing, and execut- Stuttgart, Germany where he was as- ing. That has been our goal and aim signed to the J4 Directorate. He for quite some time now. In the year served as the Directorate’s Integrated CDR Bryan “STAG” Pinckney, a na- that has passed, the CARTER HALL Priority List manager, Annual Joint performed at a sustained superior tive of Richmond, VA, graduated from Assessment lead, and was a member Episcopal High School in Alexandria, level, and for such we were privileged of the Director’s Command Action to be selected as the winner of the VA followed by Vanderbilt University Group to spearhead USEUCOM’s with a B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Navy, Dod § 700.1057
    Department of the Navy, DoD § 700.1057 peace. In time of war or a national § 700.1057 Command of an air activity. emergency, such retired officers may, (a) The officer detailed to command a at the discretion of the Secretary of naval aviation school, a naval air sta- the Navy, be ordered to active service. tion, or a naval air unit organized for § 700.1053 Commander of a task force. flight tactical purposes shall be an offi- cer of the line in the navy, designated (a) A geographic fleet commander, as a naval aviator or naval flight offi- and any other naval commander, may cer, eligible for command at sea. detail in command of a task force, or (b) For the purposes of Title 10 U.S.C. other task command, any eligible offi- § 5942, a naval air training squadron is cer within his or her command whom not considered to be a naval aviation he or she desires. All other officers or- school or a naval air unit organized for dered to the task force or the task command shall be considered subordi- flight tactical purposes. The officer de- nate to the designated commander. tailed to command a naval air training squadron or an air unit organized for (b) All orders issued under the au- administrative purposes shall be a line thority of this article shall continue in officer of the naval service, designated effect after the death or disability of as a naval aviator or naval flight offi- the officer issuing them until they are cer, eligible for command.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Navy Training System Plan N88-Ntsp-A-50-8501B/D
    DRAFT NAVY TRAINING SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE AGM-65F IMAGING INFRARED MAVERICK MISSILE N88-NTSP-A-50-8501B/D MAY 1998 Enclosure (1) N88-NTSP-A-50-8501B/D AGM-65F IMAGING INFRARED MAVERICK MISSILE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Air Force is the Executive Service for development of the AGM-65 Maverick Missile System series. In October 1978, the Air Force began engineering development of the Air Force Imaging Infrared (IIR) Maverick AGM-65D, and in 1980 the Navy started development of the Navy AGM-65F IIR Maverick utilizing a modified IIR tracker from the Air Force AGM-65D Guidance and Control Section (GCS) and the Center-Aft Section (CAS) from the Navy AGM-65E. The AGM-65F IIR Maverick Missile is currently in the Operational Support Phase of the Weapon System Acquisition Process. The AGM-65F IIR Maverick Missile is designed primarily for use against targets requiring instantaneous or delayed blast fuzing for destruction of hardened ground and waterborne targets during day or night operations and in adverse weather conditions, with sufficient standoff range to permit limited exposures to terminal defenses. The IIR Maverick does not replace any weapons in the current inventory. The IIR Maverick does not affect current manning levels or existing Navy Enlisted Classification codes and Marine Corps Military Occupational Specialties. Manpower requirements at the organizational, intermediate, and depot level maintenance activities are based upon total workload requirements for a specific work center, and the skills needed to perform maintenance on the systems supported by that work center. The IIR Maverick operator training is provided at the appropriate Fleet Readiness Squadrons for P-3C pilot and Naval Flight Officer personnel, for F/A-18 pilot and Weapons System Officer personnel, and for AV-8B pilots.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Naval Aviator Soars High Targeting Your Social ATLANTIC OCEAN — Lt
    /MISSION BRIEF /OCTOBER IN NAVAL AVIATION HISTORY To safely train the world’s finest combat quality aviation Oct. 3, 1962: Sigma 7 (Mercury 8) is launched. The mission is professionals, delivering them at the right time, in the piloted by Cmdr. Walter M. Schirra, Jr., and lasts 9 hours and 13 minutes. Schirra makes six orbits at an altitude up to 175.8 statute right numbers, and at the right cost to a naval force miles at 17,558 mph. Recovery is conducted by USS Kearsarge that is where it matters, when it matters. (CVS 33). /WE ARE TEAM CNATRA Oct. 4, 1943: TBF and F4F aircraft from VC-9 based onboard USS • We are “all in” for the mission Card (CVE 11) attack four German submarines -- U-460, U-264, • We are professionals dedicated to improving ourselves, U-422, and U-455 -- north of the Azores. Also on this date, PV 1 aircraft from VB-128 sink German submarine U-336 southwest of our team, and the naval services Iceland. • We lead with integrity, moral courage, and discipline • We are accountable to the nation, our service, each Oct. 5, 1942: PBY aircraft from Commander Aircraft South Pacific other, and our families sink Japanese submarine 1-22 near Indispensable Strait, Solomon • Integrity is our foundation Islands. Also on this date, PBY aircraft from VP-73 sink German submarine U-582 south of Iceland. /ADMIRAL’S SUGGESTION BOX Oct.6, 1997: NASA astronaut Cmdr. Wendy B. Lawrence returns Got a suggestion? There are several ways to submit from mission STS-86 Atlantis, the seventh mission to rendezvous your suggestions to Rear Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Navy, Dod § 700.1057
    Department of the Navy, DoD § 700.1057 peace. In time of war or a national § 700.1057 Command of an air activity. emergency, such retired officers may, (a) The officer detailed to command a at the discretion of the Secretary of naval aviation school, a naval air sta- the Navy, be ordered to active service. tion, or a naval air unit organized for § 700.1053 Commander of a task force. flight tactical purposes shall be an offi- cer of the line in the navy, designated (a) A geographic fleet commander, as a naval aviator or naval flight offi- and any other naval commander, may cer, eligible for command at sea. detail in command of a task force, or (b) For the purposes of Title 10 U.S.C. other task command, any eligible offi- § 5942, a naval air training squadron is cer within his or her command whom not considered to be a naval aviation he or she desires. All other officers or- school or a naval air unit organized for dered to the task force or the task command shall be considered subordi- flight tactical purposes. The officer de- nate to the designated commander. tailed to command a naval air training squadron or an air unit organized for (b) All orders issued under the au- administrative purposes shall be a line thority of this article shall continue in officer of the naval service, designated effect after the death or disability of as a naval aviator or naval flight offi- the officer issuing them until they are cer, eligible for command.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Timothy J. Duening Vice-Commandant
    Captain Timothy J. Duening Vice-Commandant Captain Duening is a native of Eagle River, Wisconsin. He graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Physical Geography in 1984. He entered Aviation Officer Candidate School and was commissioned in July 1986. Immediately following commissioning, he began flight training and was designated a Flight Officer in October 1987. In May 1988, after completion of P-3 Fleet Replacement Squadron pilot training at Patrol Squadron THIRTY (VP-30) in Jacksonville, Florida, Captain Duening joined Patrol Squadron ELEVEN (VP-11) in Brunswick, Maine and subsequently completed deployments to Keflavik, Iceland and Sigonella, Sicily. During this tour he was designated a P-3C Patrol Plane Tactical Coordinator, Instructor TACCO and Mission Commander. In April of 1991, Captain Duening was ordered to Patrol Squadron THIRTY ONE (VP-31) as a Naval Flight Officer Instructor. Billets assigned during this tour included Public Affairs Officer, Schedules Officer and Assistant Operations Officer. In May 1993, Captain Duening joined the USS NIMITZ (CVN 68) as Catapult and Arresting Gear Officer. He reported aboard NIMITZ during a Western Pacific deployment to the Persian Gulf and served as Arresting Branch Officer, Bow and Waist Catapult Branch Officer and V-2 Division Officer. In May 1995, he received orders to Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California and subsequently earned a Masters of Science Degree in Management in the Manpower Systems Analysis curriculum. In October 1997, he returned to sea duty, joining the & ldquo Fighting Marlins& rdquo of Patrol Squadron FORTY (VP-40) while deployed to Misawa, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Officer Street-To-Fleet Database
    CAB D0006693.A2/Final September 2002 Officer Street-to-Fleet Database Ann D. Parcell • John Maitrejean, LT, USN Carol S. Moore 4825 Mark Center Drive • Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1850 Approved for distribution: September 2002 Donald J. Cymrot, Director Workforce, Education and Training Team Resource Analysis Division CNA’s annotated briefings are either condensed presentations of the results of formal CNA studies that have been further documented elsewhere or stand-alone presentations of research reviewed and endorsed by CNA. These briefings repre- sent the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. They do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N00014-00-D-0700. For copies of this document call:CNA Document Control and Distribution Section(703) 824-2123. Copyright Ó 2002 The CNA Corporation Officer Street-to-Fleet Database September 2002 Ann Parcell John Maitrejean, LT (USN) Carol Moore Center for Naval Analyses This study is sponsored by N81 for preparation of the 2002 Training and Education IWAR. 1 Tasking for the Officer Street-to-Fleet (OSTF) Project • Create for officers what CNA has already created for enlisted Sailors (enlisted street-to-fleet) – Goal is a readily available database for leadership to use in analyzing early career policies • Analysis of time-to-train to first assignment for officers by community – Emphasis on aviation community CNA’s enlisted street-to-fleet database has proved useful for analyzing virtually any part of a Sailor’s career—from bootcamp, to time at sea, to leaving the Navy. At the aggregate (Navy-wide) level, the database has helped set the standard for computing attrition statistics; it analyzes the efficiency of training pipelines and determines the effect of changes in training on success in the fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • S-3B Aircraft N88-Ntsp-A-50-8310D/D January 1998
    DRAFT NAVY TRAINING SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE S-3B AIRCRAFT N88-NTSP-A-50-8310D/D JANUARY 1998 Enclosure (1) N88-NTSP-A-50-8310D/D S-3B AIRCRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The S-3B Aircraft is a modified S-3A Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) aircraft, with increased ASW and new Anti-Surface Warfare capabilities through improvements to various mission avionics and armament systems. Between July 1987 and July 1991, all east coast S-3A Aircraft were modified by a contractor field team at the Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, Florida. In March 1992, a contractor field team at NAS North Island, California, began modifying west coast S-3A Aircraft to the S-3B Aircraft configuration and completed modifications in September 1994. The S-3B Aircraft is in Phase III, Production, Fielding, Deployment, and Operational Support phase of the Weapon System Acquisition Process. In fiscal year 1992, ten aircraft S-3B squadrons were reduced to six aircraft. In 1993, aircraft assets for deployed squadrons were increased to eight, to meet increased operational requirements caused by retirement of the A-6E from the Navy inventory. All S-3B squadrons are currently configured and manned for eight aircraft. Support of the S-3B Aircraft peculiar equipment was developed under current equipment and S-3 Aircraft maintenance plans. Interim support was provided by the equipment vendors. Maintenance is conducted at three levels (organizational, intermediate, and depot) as established by OPNAVINST 4790.2F. Overall squadron manpower requirements remain unchanged. Intermediate level maintenance billets are assigned to the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department (AIMD) Sea Operational Detachments.
    [Show full text]
  • Ass't. Commandant to Retire a Record Crowd of 14,000 Attended Open House Last Year
    Vol. 19, No 43 Marine Corps Air Station, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii October 23,1970 Blue Angels BrigGen. Armstrong Here Nov. 1 SOO The Navy's famed Blue New 1st MarBde CG Angels are coming to Oahu. K-Bay is scheduled for the third show Brigadier General V.A. Armstrong is scheduled to assume (Nov.1) which also features the command of the 1st Marine Brigade here today at 3 p.m. Army's Golden Knights Parachute His predecessor, Colonel B.G. Cass, will step into the position of team. Chief of Staff for the Brigade. The U.S. Navy Flight Demonstration Team is 24 years The general conies to the Air Station from the position of Marine old. The maneuvers they fly are Corps Liaison Officer, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, the same ones taught to every Washington, D.C. This is the first time since 1965 when Brigadier Naval aviator during flight General Marion E. Carl commanded the Brigade, that a general officer training, but when the Blue commanded the organization. Angels fly them, they take on an The general entered the Aviation Cadet Program in May 1942, and aire of perfection. According to was designated a Naval Aviator on April 3, 1943.Since then, he has seen the "Blues", as they are sometimes called, "The secret action in World War II, Korea and a Blue behind the smonth grace of Jr11:4% Vietnam, earning two Silver Star Angel performance is practice, Navy Day medals, the Legion of Merit with teamwork, coordination, alertness PERFECT TAKEOFF... The Blue Angels demonstrate one of (new combat "V", seven Distinguished and physical conditioning...and many maneuevers which have thrilled audiences throughout the Flying Crosses, twelve Air Medals.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Jax Navy and Mayport, June 2020
    Visiting Jax Navy and Mayport, June 2020 By Robbin Laird August 2020 VISITING JAX NAVY, JUNE 2020 3 O.K I AM A P-8 OPERATOR: BUT HOW DO I TRAIN TO WORK IN A KILL WEB? 8 THE COMING OF MISR TO THE FLEET: THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE FIRST DEPLOYED MISR OFFICER 11 SHAPING A WAY AHEAD FOR THE TRITON: ENABLING THE INTEGRATED DISTRIBUTED FORCE 15 THE STANDING UP OF TOCRON-11: THE NEXT STEP IN BUILDING OUT KILL WEB INFRASTRUCTURE 17 VUP-19 AND THE COMING OF TRITON TO THE FLEET 21 THE CHALLENGE OF MANNING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNAISSANCE FORCES FOR THE NEW STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT 28 VISITING THE SEAHAWK WEAPONS SCHOOL: INSIGHTS IN THE WAY AHEAD FOR THE FLEET 35 SEAHAWK, FIRE SCOUT AND SHAPING A WAY AHEAD FOR THE KILL WEB FORCE 39 THE SEAHAWK IN THE EXTENDED BATTLESPACE 41 SOFTWARE, OPERATIONS, TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT: WORKING THE NEW COMBAT CYCLE FOR A KILL WEB FORCE 45 THE MARITIME PATROL RECONNAISSANCE AND MAN MACHINE TEAMING 47 2 Visiting Jax Navy, June 2020 06/30/2020 Ed Timperlake and I visited Jax Navy almost four years to the day of when I visited Jax Navy this month. In 2013, the first P-8 squadron prepared for deployment; and this year, the 100th P-8 was delivered to the Navy. When we visited in 2016, the Navy was in to only three years of deployment and the partner of the P- 8, the Triton, was not operating as it is today in the Pacific. During the 2016 visit, we got a clear sense of how the fighting Navy was re-calibrating to deal with the new strategic context, in which it was spearheading the new generation ISR and anti-submarine fight.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 2079 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 6029 §6024. Aviation
    Page 2079 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 6029 provided qualifications to receive aviation designation There is no provision of law specifically stating that of naval aviator. See section 2003 of this title. the Medical Corps is in the Medical Department. It was the first corps to have duties relating to medical and § 6024. Aviation designations: naval flight officer sanitary matters and so long as it was the only corps having such duties there was no need for the depart- Any officer of the naval service may be des- mental concept. The subsequent establishment of other ignated a naval flight officer if he has success- corps with related duties ‘‘in the Medical Department’’ fully completed the course prescribed for naval indicates clearly that the Medical Corps is in that De- flight officers. partment. The words ‘‘effective August 4, 1947’’ and the words (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 377; Pub. L. ‘‘establishing the Medical Service Corps’’ in 34 U.S.C. 91–198, § 1(2), Feb. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 15.) 30a are omitted as executed. The words ‘‘is created and established as a Staff Corps of the United States Navy’’ HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES in 34 U.S.C. 43 are omitted as executed. Revised AMENDMENTS section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 1986—Pub. L. 99–433 substituted ‘‘section 5150(b)’’ for 6024 ......... 34 U.S.C. 735 (par. 3). June 24, 1926, ch. 668, § 3 ‘‘section 5155(b)’’. (par. 3), 44 Stat. 767. 1980—Pub. L. 96–513 authorized the Secretary of the Navy to designate staff corps as being in the Medical The phrase ‘‘by competent authority’’ is omitted as Department of the Navy and deleted specific references surplusage.
    [Show full text]
  • Command of a Naval Base
    Department of the Navy, DoD § 700.1057 peace. In time of war or a national § 700.1057 Command of an air activity. emergency, such retired officers may, (a) The officer detailed to command a at the discretion of the Secretary of naval aviation school, a naval air sta- the Navy, be ordered to active service. tion, or a naval air unit organized for § 700.1053 Commander of a task force. flight tactical purposes shall be an offi- cer of the line in the navy, designated (a) A geographic fleet commander, as a naval aviator or naval flight offi- and any other naval commander, may cer, eligible for command at sea. detail in command of a task force, or (b) For the purposes of Title 10 U.S.C. other task command, any eligible offi- § 5942, a naval air training squadron is cer within his or her command whom not considered to be a naval aviation he or she desires. All other officers or- school or a naval air unit organized for dered to the task force or the task command shall be considered subordi- flight tactical purposes. The officer de- nate to the designated commander. tailed to command a naval air training squadron or an air unit organized for (b) All orders issued under the au- administrative purposes shall be a line thority of this article shall continue in officer of the naval service, designated effect after the death or disability of as a naval aviator or naval flight offi- the officer issuing them until they are cer, eligible for command.
    [Show full text]