THE WHOLE TRUTH from an INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE from National Organization Responding Against HUJE That Seek to Harm the Green S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE WHOLE TRUTH FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE from National Organization Responding Against HUJE that seek to harm the Green Space Industry (NORAHG) It is believed that Suzuki ought to be INVESTIGATED by Taxation Agencies in both the United States and Canada ANY information concerning the activities of David Suzuki should be recorded and relayed to local government or taxation offices in order to assist with investigation STOP Suzuki ! RAT–OUT Suzuki through the appropriate COMPLAINT CHANNELS Demand a REVOCATION of Suzuki’s REGISTERED CHARITY TAX–EXEMPT STATUS ! William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature July 27 t h , 2011 Toronto Sun Opinion Editorial Selected and adapted excerpts NON–PARTISAN ― No ! NON–PROFIT ― No ! REGISTERED–CHARITY ― W hy ? TAX–EXEMPT ― W hy ? ENVIRO–LUNATIC – Yes ! IN COMPLIANCE WITH CANADA REVENUE AGENCY RULES ― No ! LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK ― TAX–FREE William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature David Suzuki Is Being Uncharitable David Suzuki Foundation promotes itself as a NATION–WIDE , NON– PARTISAN , NON–PROFIT , REGISTERED–CHARITY , TAX–EXEMPT ENVI- RONMENTAL ORGANIZATION . The rules at the CANADA REVENUE AGENCY seem clear. A registered charity « cannot be involved in partisan political activities ». Unless, apparently, you are David Suzuki and the David Suzuki Foundation. Here is how CANADA REVENUE AGENCY defines what is prohibited to David Suzuki Foundation ― << A political activity is considered partisan if it involves direct or indirect support of, or opposition to, a political party or candidate for public office. Charities can promote the policies of political parties and candidates they agree with, but must not directly or indi- rectly support the political party or candidate for public of- fice. >> William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature On July 21 st , 2011, the Toronto Star reported David Suzuki, in an interview, urged Ontarians to re–elect Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty on October 6th , 2011 ― << I’m offering an endorsement of what Mr. McGuinty has done, absolutely. >> SUZUKI IS NON–PARTISAN ?!?! Suzuki described the environmental policies of the Conservative opposition rival, Tim Hudak, as « absolute insanity ». SUZUKI IS NON–PARTISAN ?!?! In a 2008 speech at McGill University, David Suzuki suggested Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Conservative Alberta Premier Ed Stel- mach, should be jailed for « inter–generational » climate crimes. SUZUKI IS NON–PARTISAN ?!?! A spokesman for the Suzuki Foundation later said Suzuki was not speaking literally. This is Suzuki’s BOGUS EXCUSE TO REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE WITH CANA- DA REVENUE AGENCY RULES . William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature In 2007, Suzuki told an audience of school children in Calgary, as he accept- ed 835 dollars they raised for his foundation ― << The only thing ( Prime Minister Stephen Harper ) cares about is getting re–elected with a majority government. He has never, ever indicated he cares about the environ- ment. >> SUZUKI IS NON–PARTISAN ?!?! David Suzuki has said such comments are « my personal opinion » and « nothing to do with my foundation ». This is Suzuki’s BOGUS EXCUSE TO REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE WITH CANA- DA REVENUE AGENCY RULES . William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature But, HOW CAN ANYONE DISTINGUISH THE VIEWS OF DAVID SUZUKI FROM THE DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION ? Its website is « davidsuzuki.org » and not « davidsuzukifoundation.org ». There’s a picture of Suzuki at the top. His views and biographical information are prominently displayed. Who has the average person ever heard of in the David Suzuki Foundation, aside from David Suzuki ? The CANADA REVENUE AGENCY does not comment on the activities of spe- cific charities. If a charity is found to be non–compliant with The Income Tax Act, action may range from « helping ( it ) to understand the rules » to REVOCATION OF ITS REGISTERED CHARITY TAX–EXEMPT STATUS . If people have reason to believe a charity is not in compliance, they can con- tact the CANADA REVENUE AGENCY at 1–800–267–2384. RAT–OUT Suzuki. DEMAND A TOTAL REVOCATION OF SUZUKI’S REGISTERED CHARITY TAX–EXEMPT STATUS ! William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION David Suzuki Foundation is a PROHIBITION–TERRORIST–ORGANIZATION THAT CONSPIRES TO IMPOSE THE NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, AND MALICIOUS PROHIBITION OF PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS. Suzuki seeks to IMPOSE A NATIONAL PROHIBITION OF ALL PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS. David Suzuki Foundation is supposed to be a NATION–WIDE, NON–PARTISAN, NON– PROFIT, REGISTERED–CHARITY, TAX–EXEMPT ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION. David Suzuki Foundation was co–founded in 1991 by Non–Expert Enviro–Lunatic Fund– Raiser, Alliance–Puppet–Master, Psychedelic–Hippie, and Enter- tainer DAVID TAKAYOSHI SUZUKI. David Suzuki Foundation operates across Canada and the Unit- ed States, but its business headquarters, with over FIFTY EM- PLOYEES, is located in Vancouver, British Columbia. It has branch offices in Ottawa and Montreal. Suzuki is a MILLIONAIRE FOR–PROFIT LOBBYING ORGANIZA- TION that operates with a budget of over SIX MILLION DOL- LARS PER YEAR. Suzuki is arguably the largest MULTI–MILLION DOLLAR MON- EY–MAKING MACHINE of its kind. David Suzuki Foundation uses POLITICIZED SCIENCE to CO- ERCE, INTIMIDATE, and ALARM the public with NONSENSICAL solutions to conserve nature and help achieve sustainability within a generation. David Suzuki Foundation has developed expertise in the distri- bution of ideas related to POLITICIZED SCIENCE and public pol- icy concerning the environment. William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature SUZUKI PARTISAN AND POLITICAL TERROR TALK October 15 th , 2008 Retrieved from Web Site David Suzuki Foundation << Likewise, MUNICIPALITIES SHOULD BE EXPLICITLY EMPOWERED TO REGULATE PESTICIDE USE WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES. Provincial policy in this area should act as a floor, not a ceiling; complementary munici- pal restrictions on pesticide use should be encouraged. For instance, IF PROVINCIAL PROHIBITIONS EXEMPT GOLF COURSES, as proposed in the discussion paper, municipalities need clear authority to RESTRICT PES- TICIDE USE ON GOLF COURSES within their boundaries to better protect public health and the environment. >> March 17 th , 2009 Media Release David Suzuki Foundation << The Ontario law [ prohibition of pest control products ] is some- thing the David Suzuki Foundation, along with a range of health and environmental organizations, HAS BEEN PUSHING FOR. >> March 4 th , 2009 Media Release David Suzuki Foundation << The Suzuki Foundation challenges other provinces to « MEET OR BEAT » Ontario’s ban on cosmetic pesticides to ensure a high standard of protection for human health and the environment ACROSS THE COUNTRY. >> William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature SUZUKI CLAIMS DANGEROUS, HYPOCRITICAL, and INSATIABLE David Suzuki Foundation claims that ... << The David Suzuki Foundation works through science and education to protect the diversity of nature and our quality of life, now and for the future. >> [ ?!?! ] In fact, Suzuki’s MAIN OBJECTIVE is PROFIT, with MORE DONATIONS by SCAMMING THE PUBLIC with the CONCOCTION OF FRAUDULENT LIES and IMAGINARY DANGER about pest control products. MORE LIES means MORE PROFIT. Suzuki CONSPIRES to PROHIBIT pest control products that are otherwise HEALTH–CANADA– APPROVED, FEDERALLY–LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY–SAFE, and TOTALLY–IRREPLACEABLE. SUZUKI FALSE LEGACY DANGEROUS, HYPOCRITICAL, and INSATIABLE Suzuki has spread MORE ENVIRONMENTAL MISINFORMATION THAN MOST other Environmental–Terrorist– Organizations. Together, Suzuki and ALLIES in other Environmental–Terrorist– Organizations have EXPLOITED EMOTIONS and FEARS about a variety of issues, including pest control products. They have demanded accountability from everyone else BUT THEMSELVES. They have PROFITED FINANCIALLY or POLITICALLY from FALSE STORIES and PREDICTIONS, and IMAGINARY DANGER, and have NEVER been held accountable. William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature Suzuki and ALLIES in other Environmental–Terrorist–Organizations use FALSE IDEAS that are presented OUT–OF–CONTEXT, then left uncorrected by lack of follow–up. Suzuki’s REAL LEGACY is DESTROYED ECONOMIES, LOST JOBS AND HARDSHIP FOR PEO- PLE, ANXIOUS CHILDREN, and WEAKENED COMMUNITIES. Now in his 70s, David Suzuki himself is busy RE–WRITING HISTORY by promoting his FALSE LEGACY through books and events. SUZUKI FUNDING David Suzuki Foundation operates as a so–called non–profit INDEPENDENT charity that DOES NOT accept government grants. However, this policy DOES NOT preclude Suzuki from accepting money from organizations that DO accept government grants. Suzuki has claimed to be funded by more than forty–thousand donors from around the world ( including eighteen–thousand in Ontario ), as well as over fifty corporations and foundations. SUZUKI DONORS AND CONTRIBUTORS • Bank of Montreal BMO Employee Charitable Foundation • BC Buddhist Church Federation • Bell Canada • Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( another PROHIBITION–TERRORIST–ORGANIZATION ) • Canon Canada Inc. • Congregation of Notre Dame • Domtar Inc. • IBM Canada Ltd. • McGraw–Hill Ryerson William H. Gathercole & NORAHG │ [email protected] │ Force Of Nature • Patrick and