County-Potentially Problematic Plant List
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Identification of Cereal Remains from Archaeological Sites 2Nd Edition 2006
Identification of cereal remains from archaeological sites 2nd edition 2006 Spikelet fork of the “new glume wheat” (Jones et al. 2000) Stefanie JACOMET and collaborators Archaeobotany Lab IPAS, Basel University English translation partly by James Greig CEREALS: CEREALIA Fam. Poaceae /Gramineae (Grasses) Systematics and Taxonomy All cereal species belong botanically (taxonomically) to the large family of the Gramineae (Poaceae). This is one of the largest Angiosperm families with >10 000 different species. In the following the systematics for some of the most imporant taxa is shown: class: Monocotyledoneae order: Poales familiy: Poaceae (= Gramineae) (Süssgräser) subfamily: Pooideae Tribus: Triticeae Subtribus: Triticinae genera: Triticum (Weizen, wheat); Aegilops ; Hordeum (Gerste; barley); Elymus; Hordelymus; Agropyron; Secale (Roggen, rye) Note : Avena and the millets belong to other Tribus. The identification of prehistoric cereal remains assumes understanding of different subject areas in botany. These are mainly morphology and anatomy, but also phylogeny and evolution (and today, also genetics). Since most of the cereal species are treated as domesticated plants, many different forms such as subspecies, varieties, and forms appear inside the genus and species (see table below). In domesticates the taxonomical category of variety is also called “sort” (lat. cultivar, abbreviated: cv.). This refers to a variety which evolved through breeding. Cultivar is the lowest taxonomic rank in the domesticated plants. Occasionally, cultivars are also called races: e.g. landraces evolved through genetic isolation, under local environmental conditions whereas „high-breed-races“ were breed by strong selection of humans. Anyhow: The morphological delimitation of cultivars is difficult, sometimes even impossible. It needs great experience and very detailed morphological knowledge. -
Of Physalis Longifolia in the U.S
The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review1 ,2 3 2 2 KELLY KINDSCHER* ,QUINN LONG ,STEVE CORBETT ,KIRSTEN BOSNAK , 2 4 5 HILLARY LORING ,MARK COHEN , AND BARBARA N. TIMMERMANN 2Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 3Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, USA 4Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA 5Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review. The wild tomatillo, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and related species have been important wild-harvested foods and medicinal plants. This paper reviews their traditional use as food and medicine; it also discusses taxonomic difficulties and provides information on recent medicinal chemistry discoveries within this and related species. Subtle morphological differences recognized by taxonomists to distinguish this species from closely related taxa can be confusing to botanists and ethnobotanists, and many of these differences are not considered to be important by indigenous people. Therefore, the food and medicinal uses reported here include information for P. longifolia, as well as uses for several related taxa found north of Mexico. The importance of wild Physalis species as food is reported by many tribes, and its long history of use is evidenced by frequent discovery in archaeological sites. These plants may have been cultivated, or “tended,” by Pueblo farmers and other tribes. The importance of this plant as medicine is made evident through its historical ethnobotanical use, information in recent literature on Physalis species pharmacology, and our Native Medicinal Plant Research Program’s recent discovery of 14 new natural products, some of which have potent anti-cancer activity. -
Genomespecific Introgression Between Wheat and Its Wild Relative
doi: 10.1111/jeb.12040 SHORT COMMUNICATION Genome-specific introgression between wheat and its wild relative Aegilops triuncialis C. PARISOD*, C. DEFINOD*, A. SARR*, N. ARRIGO*† &F.FELBER*1 *Laboratory of Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchaˆtel, Neuchaˆtel, Switzerland †Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Keywords: Abstract barbed goatgrass; Introgression of sequences from crop species in wild relatives is of funda- containment strategy; mental and practical concern. Here, we address gene flow between culti- crop-to-wild gene flow; vated wheat and its widespread polyploid relative, Aegilops triuncialis, using genetically modified wheat; 12 EST-SSR markers mapped on wheat chromosomes. The presence of genome-specific introgression; wheat diagnostic alleles in natural populations of the barbed goatgrass hybridization; growing in proximity to cultivated fields highlights that substantial gene mapped EST-SSR; flow occurred when both species coexisted. Furthermore, loci from the A transgene escape. subgenome of wheat were significantly less introgressed than sequences from other subgenomes, indicating differential introgression into Ae. triun- cialis. Gene flow between such species sharing nonhomeologous chromo- somes addresses the evolutionary outcomes of hybridization and may be important for efficient gene containment. have been reported in European agro-ecosystems Introduction (Felber et al., 2007). With the advent of genetically Reproduction between genetically distinct taxa, pro- modified crops, the consequences of introgression on ducing offspring of mixed ancestry (i.e. hybridization), local biota are receiving growing attention (Chapman plays a crucial role in evolution (Arnold, 2006). & Burke, 2006; Kwit et al., 2011). However, interspecific gene flow has been generally The Triticum/Aegilops species complex represents an overlooked, and the factors determining the outcome outstanding model to evaluate crop-to-wild gene flow. -
NPV Dissertação (2008).Pdf (4.051Mb)
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ Setor de Ciências Exatas – Departamento de Química Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química Alcalóides Esteroidais dos Frutos Maduros de Solanum caavurana Vell. Mestranda: Nelissa Pacheco Vaz Orientadora: Profª. Drª. Beatriz Helena L. de N. Sales Maia Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química, para obtenção do Título de Mestre em Ciências, área de concentração Química Orgânica. Curitiba-PR Janeiro 2008 “A química é talvez a ciência que mais necessita de amigos. Para fazê-los, tê-los e mantê-los basta a humildade de perceber que você nunca vai conseguir saber tudo de química e que eles sempre poderão lhe ensinar alguma coisa.” (Flávio Leite) ii AGRADECIMENTOS: U A Deus pela vida e oportunidade de adquirir conhecimento superior de qualidade numa sociedade tão desigual; U À minha família por acreditarem, apoiarem, incentivarem e terem investido tempo, amor e dedicação para a realização dos meus sonhos. Agradeço também pela compreensão e convivência; U A Universidade Federal do Paraná e ao Departamento de Química desta universidade pela oportunidade de realização deste trabalho; U À professora Drª. Beatriz Helena Lameiro de Noronha Sales Maia pela orientação, amizade, compreensão, presença, motivação e auxílio durante a realização deste trabalho; U À professora Drª. Raquel Marques Braga - Instituto de Química - Universidade de Campinas (IQ - UNICAMP) pelas análises de ressonância magnética nuclear e auxílios nas determinações estruturais; U Ao professor Dr. Norberto Peporine Lopes - Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo: Departamento de Física e Química – (FCFRP-USP) pela aquisição dos Espectros de Massas; U Aos biólogos Drª. -
Minnesota and Federal Prohibited and Noxious Plants List 6-22-2011
Minnesota and Federal Prohibited and Noxious Plants List 6-22-2011 Minnesota and Federal Prohibited and Noxious Plants by Scientific Name (compiled by the Minnesota DNR’s Invasive Species Program 6-22-2011) Key: FN – Federal noxious weed (USDA–Animal Plant Health Inspection Service) SN – State noxious weed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) RN – Restricted noxious weed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) PI – Prohibited invasive species (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) PS – State prohibited weed seed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) RS – State restricted weed seed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) (See explanations of these classifications below the lists of species) Regulatory Scientific Name Common Name Classification Aquatic Plants: Azolla pinnata R. Brown mosquito fern, water velvet FN Butomus umbellatus Linnaeus flowering rush PI Caulerpa taxifolia (Vahl) C. Agardh Mediterranean strain (killer algae) FN Crassula helmsii (Kirk) Cockayne Australian stonecrop PI Eichomia azurea (Swartz) Kunth anchored water hyacinth, rooted water FN hyacinth Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle hydrilla FN, PI Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L. European frog-bit PI Hygrophila polysperma (Roxburgh) T. Anders Indian swampweed, Miramar weed FN, PI Ipomoea aquatica Forsskal water-spinach, swamp morning-glory FN Lagarosiphon major (Ridley) Moss ex Wagner African oxygen weed FN, PI Limnophila sessiliflora (Vahl) Blume ambulia FN Lythrum salicaria L., Lythrum virgatum L., (or any purple loosestrife PI, SN variety, hybrid or cultivar thereof) Melaleuca quenquinervia (Cav.) Blake broadleaf paper bank tree FN Monochoria hastata (Linnaeus) Solms-Laubach arrowleaf false pickerelweed FN Monochoria vaginalis (Burman f.) C. Presl heart-shaped false pickerelweed FN Myriophyllum spicatum Linnaeus Eurasian water mifoil PI Najas minor All. brittle naiad PI Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers. -
Gopher–Plant–Fungal Interactions Affect
Ecology, 84(1), 2003, pp. 120±128 q 2003 by the Ecological Society of America GOPHER±PLANT±FUNGAL INTERACTIONS AFFECT ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INVASIVE GRASS VALERIE T. E VINER1,3 AND F. S TUART CHAPIN, III2 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA 2Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA Abstract. Many attempts have been made to link invasions of exotic plants to speci®c plant traits and key attributes of invaded ecosystems. While these factors play a role in determining the potential for invasion, they are often inadequate in predicting the success of a speci®c invasion. We show that interactions of an invasive grass with other members of the community determine the local pattern of invasion. A fungus, Ulocladium atrum, aids the establishment of barbed goatgrass (Aegilops triuncialis) by weakening the grass's tough seed head, thereby accelerating germination and seedling establishment. In contrast, gophers, Thomomys bottae, decrease establishment of this invader by selectively burying patches of goatgrass seedlings under mounds. Plants that survive these gopher disturbances produce seeds that are uninfected by Ulocladium atrum, which may further decrease the establishment of the next generation of goatgrass. A ®eld survey indicated that goatgrass achieves dominance in areas with minimal gopher disturbance, but has limited establishment in pastures with high gopher activity, indicating that the landscape pattern of gopher activity in¯uences patterns of goatgrass invasion by manipulating gopher±plant±fungal interactions. Key words: Aegilops triuncialis; California (USA) annual grasslands; disturbance; fungus; ger- mination; goatgrass; plant invasion; pocket gophers; species interactions, role in plant invasion; Thomomys bottae; Ulocladium atrum. -
Code of Federal Regulations GPO Access
9±16±97 Tuesday Vol. 62 No. 179 September 16, 1997 Pages 48449±48730 Briefings on how to use the Federal Register For information on briefings in Boston, MA, see the announcement on the inside cover of this issue. Now Available Online Code of Federal Regulations via GPO Access (Selected Volumes) Free, easy, online access to selected Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) volumes is now available via GPO Access, a service of the United States Government Printing Office (GPO). CFR titles will be added to GPO Access incrementally throughout calendar years 1996 and 1997 until a complete set is available. GPO is taking steps so that the online and printed versions of the CFR will be released concurrently. The CFR and Federal Register on GPO Access, are the official online editions authorized by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register. New titles and/or volumes will be added to this online service as they become available. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr For additional information on GPO Access products, services and access methods, see page II or contact the GPO Access User Support Team via: ★ Phone: toll-free: 1-888-293-6498 ★ Email: [email protected] federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 179 / Tuesday, September 16, 1997 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 General online information 202±512±1530; 1±888±293±6498 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), Single copies/back copies: by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Paper or fiche 512±1800 Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 Register Act (49 Stat. -
Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA § 201.2
SUBCHAPTER K—FEDERAL SEED ACT PART 201—FEDERAL SEED ACT LABELING IN GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 201.31a Labeling treated seed. 201.32 Screenings. 201.33 Seed in bulk or large quantities; seed DEFINITIONS for cleaning or processing. Sec. 201.34 Kind, variety, and type; treatment 201.1 Meaning of words. substances; designation as hybrid. 201.2 Terms defined. 201.35 Blank spaces. 201.36 The words ‘‘free’’ and ‘‘none.’’ ADMINISTRATION 201.3 Administrator. MODIFYING STATEMENTS 201.36a Disclaimers and nonwarranties. RECORDS FOR AGRICULTURAL AND VEGETABLE SEEDS ADVERTISING 201.4 Maintenance and accessibility. 201.36b Name of kind and variety; designa- 201.5 Origin. tion as hybrid. 201.6 Germination. 201.36c Hermetically-sealed containers. 201.7 Purity (including variety). 201.7a Treated seed. INSPECTION LABELING AGRICULTURAL SEEDS 201.37 Authorization. 201.38 [Reserved] 201.8 Contents of the label. 201.9 Kind. SAMPLING IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE ACT 201.10 Variety. 201.39 General procedure. 201.11 Type. 201.40 Bulk. 201.11a Hybrid. 201.41 Bags. 201.12 Name of kind and variety. 201.42 Small containers. 201.12a Seed mixtures. 201.43 Size of sample. 201.13 Lot number or other identification. 201.44 Forwarding samples. 201.14 Origin. 201.15 Weed seeds. PURITY ANALYSIS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF 201.16 Noxious-weed seeds. THE ACT 201.17 Noxious-weed seeds in the District of Columbia. 201.45 Obtaining the working sample. 201.18 Other agricultural seeds. 201.46 Weight of working sample. 201.19 Inert matter. 201.47 Separation. 201.20 Germination. 201.47a Seed unit. 201.21 Hard seed or dormant seed. -
Seedimages Species Database List
Seedimages.com Scientific List (possibly A. cylindrica) Agropyron trachycaulum Ambrosia artemisifolia (R) not Abelmoschus esculentus Agrostemma githago a synonym of A. trifida Abies concolor Agrostis alba Ambrosia confertiflora Abronia villosa Agrostis canina Ambrosia dumosa Abronia villosum Agrostis capillaris Ambrosia grayi Abutilon theophrasti Agrostis exarata Ambrosia psilostachya Acacia mearnsii Agrostis gigantea Ambrosia tomentosa Acaena anserinifolia Agrostis palustris Ambrosia trifida (L) Acaena novae-zelandiae Agrostis stolonifera Ammi majus Acaena sanguisorbae Agrostis tenuis Ammobium alatum Acalypha virginica Aira caryophyllea Amorpha canescens Acamptopappus sphaerocephalus Alcea ficifolia Amsinckia intermedia Acanthospermum hispidum Alcea nigra Amsinckia tessellata Acer rubrum Alcea rosea Anagallis arvensis Achillea millifolium Alchemilla mollis Anagallis monellii Achnatherum brachychaetum Alectra arvensis Anaphalis margaritacea Achnatherum hymenoides Alectra aspera Andropogon bicornis Acmella oleracea Alectra fluminensis Andropogon flexuosus Acroptilon repens Alectra melampyroides Andropogon gerardii Actaea racemosa Alhagi camelorum Andropogon gerardii var. Adenostoma fasciculatum Alhagi maurorum paucipilus Aegilops cylindrica Alhagi pseudalhagi Andropogon hallii Aegilops geniculata subsp. Allium canadense Andropogon ternarius geniculata Allium canadense (bulb) Andropogon virginicus Aegilops ovata Allium cepa Anemone canadensis Aegilops triuncialis Allium cernuum Anemone cylindrica Aeginetia indica Allium fistulosum Anemone -
18 New Nothogenera and 8 New Combinations in the Grass Family Poaceae
CACTOLOGIA PHANTASTICA 3(2) 4 FEB 2019 10 ISSN 2590-3403 DOI 10.5281/zenodo.2556225 18 New Nothogenera and 8 New Combinations in the Grass Family Poaceae By MAARTEN H. J. VAN DER MEER The grass family Poaceae includes major crop genera like Triticum (wheat), Hordeum (barley) and Secale (rye) in the subfamily Pooideae, and Saccharum (sugarcane), Sorghum (sorghum) and Zea (maize) in the subfamily Panicoideae. Species from this family have been used for extensive hybridization experiments. No less than 59 valid nothogenera are listed in IPNI, yet dozens of intergeneric hybrids remain nameless.1 Notho- generic names are proposed here for eighteen intergeneric hybrids, including one tetrageneric hybrid, ten trigeneric hybrids and seven bigeneric hybrids. In addition, seven new combinations for nothospecies are proposed. Wheat Barley Rye David Monniaux Cliff LSDSL CC BY-SA 3.0 / Wikimedia CC BY 2.0 / Wikimedia CC BY-SA 3.0 / Wikimedia 1 Note that the widely used ×Triticale, an invalid younger synonym of ×Triticosecale, is not listed. MAARTEN H. J. VAN DER MEER ROGGEKAMP 379 NL-2592 VV DEN HAAG [email protected] CACTOLOGIA PHANTASTICA 3(2) 4 FEB 2019 11 ISSN 2590-3403 DOI 10.5281/zenodo.2556225 Valid Nothogenera in Poaceae NOTHOGENUS PARENT 1 PARENT 2 PARENT 3 ×Achnella Achnatherum Nassella ×Aegilosecale Aegilops Secale ×Aegilotriticum Aegilops Triticum ×Agrocalamagrostis Agrostis Calamagrostis ×Agroëlymus Agropyron Elymus ×Agrohordeum Agropyron Hordeum ×Agropogon Agrostis Polypogon ×Agrositanion Acropyron Sitanion ×Agrotrigia Agropyron Elytrigia ×Agrotrisecale Agropyron Secale Triticum ×Agrotriticum Agropyron Triticum ×Ammocalamagrostis Ammophila Calamacrostis ×Arctodupontia Arctophila Dupontia ×Bromofestuca Bromus Festuca ×Calamophila Ammophila Calamagrostis ×Cynochloris Chloris Cynodon ×Danthosieglingia Danthonia Sieglingia ×Dupoa Dupontia Poa ×Dupontopoa Arctopoa Dupontia ×Elyleymus Elymus Leymus ×Elymopyron Agropyron Elymus ×Elymordeum Elymus Hordeum MAARTEN H. -
Morphological & Physiological Leaf Adaptations
MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL LEAF ADAPTATIONS TO SEASONAL AND DIURNAL ABIOTIC STRESS FOR TWO BARRIER ISLAND SAND DUNE SPECIES By HEATHER M. JOESTING A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Biology August 2009 Winston-Salem, NC Approved by: William K. Smith, Ph.D., Advisor Examining Committee: Miles R. Silman, Ph.D. Ronald V. Dimock, Jr., Ph.D. Kathleen A. Kron, Ph.D. Tara L. Greaver, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first thank my parents, Mel Pitts and Dale Joesting, for their love and support for the past decade of my college adventures as well as in all the decisions I have made for the last 31 years. I would also like to thank my wonderful supportive significant other Matt Marenberg for being my rock through the entire dissertation process and my research assistant during long hot days at the beach. I would also like to acknowledge my grandfather Elden Lee Pitts who instilled the love of science and nature in my mother and I and whose stubborn and inquisitive mind I’ve inherited. Without the love and support of these people, I would never have made it this far. I would also like to thank my advisor William K. Smith for all the guidance he has given me during this dissertation research, for always being available to answer any question I had, no matter how trivial, and for giving me the opportunity to conduct research in a habitat so near and dear to my heart. -
Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.