DOCSLIB.ORG

Updating the History of Sound Art Additions, Clarifications, More Questions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Updating the History of Sound Art Additions, Clarifications, More Questions Updating the History of Sound Art Additions, Clarifications, More Questions B e r n ha r d G á l The author takes a close look at the origins of the terms sound art t During the 1960s and early 1970s, numerous terms sur- and sound installation, identifying additional historical sources and AC faced, describing new concepts of sound creation and pre- TR addressing misconceptions about their origins. The author then focuses sentation, but also addressing new listening perspectives and on two early sound works by Max Neuhaus, a sound art pioneer who is ABS frequently said to be the creator of the first sound installation. perceptual modes. These included acoustic environment, au- dio art, continuous pieces, continuous walkthrough sound environment, eternal music, exposition of music, sound art, “What is history, but a fable agreed upon?” a seemingly bit- sound installation, sound sculpture and sound-space con- ter Napoleon Bonaparte once famously remarked, exiled to tinuum [2]. At present, “sound art” appears to be the most the remote island of Saint Helena. In the course of an on- established term—perhaps simply because it is the least going PhD project about sound installation art, I have fre- meaningful and thus most adaptable and agreeable of the quently come across factual inaccuracies about the subject many terms out there. While I and many fellow artists and that are nevertheless largely treated as undisputable facts. researchers share misgivings about the ubiquitous appropria- This includes biographical details and historical facts about tion of the term [3], its widespread acceptance has become specific artworks, but also extends to the origins of the now- fact. established terminology itself. In this article, I focus on the The terminological rise of “sound art” to popularity around emergence of the terms sound art and sound installation, and the turn of this century can be confirmed by a quantitative I discuss Drive In Music and Fan Music, two early works by search in the New York Times archives [4]. No mention of Max Neuhaus, a pioneering sound artist who often is credited “sound art” is found from 1940 until the end of 1960s; three as the creator of the “first sound installation ever.” entries appear in the 1970s; and six and ten entries occur in the 1980s and 1990s, respectively. In contrast, the first de- “SoUnd Art” cade of the new millennium reveals 65 mentions, and from It has only been in the last one-and-a-half decades, since the 2010–2016 there are 119 hits. This increase may be attribut- early 2000s, that art-related sound practices have emerged able in part to the overuse of the term, e.g. a 2014 New York from relative obscurity into mainstream art discourse. Ex- Times article even attributed the label “sound art” to Brazil- hibitions at prestigious visual arts institutions—such as the ian songwriter Caetano Veloso. Regarding the origins of the Hayward Gallery in London and P.S.1 and the Whitney Mu- term, many recent publications—including Alan Licht’s book seum of American Art in New York City—helped to increase Sound Art—link its emergence to the exhibition SOUND/ media coverage and public awareness, thus playing a major ART, curated by composer William Hellermann and pro- role in accelerating a “genre-building process,” subsuming a duced by the SoundArt Foundation, which was founded by diverse smorgasbord of sound-related activities into what is Hellermann in 1982. According to the exhibition catalog, the now commonly referred to as “sound art.” The correspond- show was presented at the Sculpture Center in New York City ing lack of clarity regarding definitions and the attributed in May 1984 and at the BACA’S DCC Gallery in Brooklyn in content has been thoroughly discussed among artists and June 1984. But since the catalog was published in 1983, ahead researchers in English and German discourses [1]. of the exhibition, the year of the exhibition is often assumed to be 1983 [5]. Bernhard Gál (artist, composer and musicologist), Vienna, Austria. I was able to trace the origins of “sound art” a little further Email: <[email protected]>. Website: <www.bernhardgal.com>. back. Art curator Peter Frank uses the term in 1982, review- See <www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/lmj/-/27> for supplemental files associated ing the 1981 SOUNDINGS exhibition at the Neuberger Mu- with this issue. seum of Art [6]. The term also appears in a press release for 78 LEONARDO MUSIC JOURNAL, Vol. 27, pp. 78–81, 2017 doi:10.1162/LMJ_a_01023 ©2017 ISAST Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01023 by guest on 27 September 2021 the exhibition Soundworks II, presented at Franklin Furnace ally found that he had used it in a 1974 project proposal [19] in New York City in 1981 [7]. Two years earlier, in their review concerning the second presentation of Drive In Music at the of the Austrian exhibition and symposium Audio Scene ’79, Artpark in Lewiston, NY, a mere 24 miles north of the origi- media art pioneers Hank Bull and Robert Adrian employ the nal installation site in Buffalo. Both Johnson’s article and the same term [8]. More significantly, Sound Art is the title of a 1974 proposal support Neuhaus’s claim of having invented small exhibition presented at the Museum of Modern Art in the term in the early 1970s [20]. New York City from 25 June to 5 August 1979. Sound Art was As with “sound art,” a search in the New York Times ar- Barbara London’s first curatorial effort for MoMA, and it fea- chives reveals a sudden increase in the usage of “sound in- tured electroacoustic works by Maggie Payne, Julia Heyward stallation” around the beginning of the new century. After and Connie Beckley, which were presented sequentially for 29 entries during the 1990s, usage rises to 164 hits during two weeks each in the Museum’s Auditorium Gallery. “Sound the first decade of the 21st century, and to 222 hits from art pieces are more closely allied to art than to music, and 2010–2016. Furthermore, another variation—“sound-art in- are usually presented in the museum, gallery, or alternative stallation”—is increasingly found in the Times archives; this space,” London states in the press release [9]. variation may be a terminological spin-off of the “sound art”- Finally, I would like to point to the Something Else Year- hype of recent years. book 1974, a collection of “intermedia artworks and texts designed for publication” and the final publication of Dick “If YoU rememBer It, YoU ProbablY Weren’t Higgins’s Something Else Press [10]. The collection is edited There”—EarlY SoUnd InStAllAtIonS by Max by Jan Herman, and the book cover shows a sequence of neuhaus terms hinting at the book’s content, with “sound art” at the Max Neuhaus’s work Drive In Music—or Drive-in Music No. top of the list. On my inquiry, Herman confirmed that he 1, as it was titled originally—has been widely said to be the included the term alluding to the contributions of Bernard first sound installation “ever,” a superlative its creator claimed Heidsieck and Henri Chopin, whose work today may be best for himself in retrospect, fifteen years after the work’s pre- described as concrete poetry or sound poetry [11]. This refer- miere in late October 1967 [21]. It is imperative to point out ence also suggests a connection with “text-sound-art,” better that numerous other artists—Maryanne Amacher, Nam June known as “text-sound-composition,” synonymous terms de- Paik, Yasunao Tone and La Monte Young, to name a few— scribing the “intermedium” of poetry and composition that share the honor of contributing to the emerging idea of “in- emerged from the creative humus of the Stockholm-based stalled sound,” i.e. continuous sound presentations offering art organization Fylkingen during the late 1960s [12]. Given specific spatial and perceptual qualities. the unclear status of source materials, further and possibly Very little information is available about Drive In Music. earlier usages of the term “sound art” may be assumed. Aside from press announcements, a diagram of the installa- tion site and drawings by Neuhaus, no documentation on the “SoUnd InStAllAtIon” installation is to be found. Thus, many details about the actual The history of the term sound installation is more straight- presentation and reception remain obscure. Various contra- forward. Straebel points out that the term can be traced back dictory statements by Neuhaus himself add to the “mystery.” to the late 1920s [13]. However, the early sources he refers to In conjunction with the creation of his work Water Whistle, concern technical aspects such as the installation of loud- a series of swimming pool “concerts” presented from 1971 speaker systems in movie theaters at the end of the silent film to 1974, he declared: “I had not yet established the idea that era [14]. Concerning sound in the arts, the term is frequently a sound work could be done in the form of an installation” attributed to Max Neuhaus [15], who also claimed its inven- [22]. In a 1999 interview, Neuhaus describes Walkthrough, tion for himself in a 1982 interview: “I called them sound another early sound installation that was presented from 1973 installations because the pieces were made from sound, and to 1976, as “his first permanent sound work” [23]. Neuhaus I was using the word installation in the visual arts context for makes a similar comment about Walkthrough in 1982: “The a work that is made for a specific place” [16]. Only a few years first long-term work was set up in New York City in 1973” later, around 1985, Neuhaus would cease to use the term for [24].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Arts of Sound Art and Music Douglas Kahn I Am Not Particularly Fond of the Term Sound Art. I Prefer the More Generic Sound I
    1 The Arts of Sound Art and Music Douglas Kahn I am not particularly fond of the term sound art. I prefer the more generic sound in the arts. My last book was subtitled a history of sound in the arts; there was no mention of sound art and not only because it was outside the historical scope of the book. Sound in the arts is a huge topic, especially when one keeps in mind the synthetic nature of the arts, i.e., the various intersecting social, cultural, and environmental realities wittingly and unwittingly embodied in any one of the innumerable factors that go into producing, experiencing, and understanding a particular work. Sound art is a smaller topic, if what is meant is that moment that artists, in the general sense of the word, began calling what they were doing sound art. In my experience, artists started to use sound art in this way during the 1980s, although there were plenty of artists doing similar things with sound earlier and not necessarily calling what they did sound art. The topic becomes smaller still if what is meant is the term that refers to what began a few years ago, and it is this meaning that has become well known. I realize that railing against the widespread use of a term is obviously not a wise use of time. That has not prevented many others wasting time on names. None of the minimalist composers seem to like the term minimalist but they were 2 more than willing to live in the shadow of that flag, if not salute.
    [Show full text]
  • Choreography and Sounding Wearables
    Scene 2 (1+2) pp. 197–220 Intellect Limited 2014 Scene Volume 2 numbers 1 & 2 © 2014 Intellect Ltd Article. English language. doi: 10.1386/scene.2.1-2.197_1 Michèle danjoux London college of Fashion choreography and sounding wearables abstract Keywords This article explores the role of ‘sounding costumes’ and body-worn technologies for costume choreographic composition, with real-time interactional elements (such as microphones, body speakers, sensors) potentially integrated into movement and expressive behaviour. movement Sounding garments explore the interactions between dancer/performer, the costume and choreography the environment in the generation and manipulation of sonic textures. Briefly discussing sound historical precedents of integrated composition, the article will mainly refer to sounding wearable prototypes in DAP-Lab’s latest production, For the time being [Victory over the Sun] interactive (2012–2014), for which I designed the wearables, highlighting new methods for build- performance ing sensual wearable electro-acoustic costumes to create kinaesonic choreographies. The article analyses the multi-perspectival potentials of such conceptual garments/wear- able artefacts to play a significant part in the creation process of a performance, focus- ing on how wearable design can influence and shape movement vocabularies through the impact of its physical material presence on the body, distinctive design aesthetics and sound-generating capabilities. Choreographically, garments and body-worn tech- nologies act as amplifying instruments
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Sound Art Arranged and Composed by J Milo Taylor Mixed by Joel Cahen
    A History of Sound Art Arranged and Composed by J Milo Taylor Mixed by Joel Cahen A History of Sound Art - A5 24pp symbols.indd 1 24/1/11 14.35.28 » Sleep Research Facility d-deck » A Hackney Balcony » Cathy Lane » Ros Bandt 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 Introduction » Charlie Fox » Janet Cardiff » John Cage A History of Sound Art I listen, I hear, I obey. Does the exquisitely dissonant institution of Sound Art, and its subsequent ordering of desire, ensure that we subscribe to a genealogy I hear silence, an absent sense of through which it is governed? knowing, of the heard, that I project into In this composition I hear a rhizomic a future. As a listener at the end of this collective, which obeys, albeit work I feel like a wobbly toddler looking contradictorily, a government in the mirror and happily hallucinating in of past and future time. my own disunity. I am left with the idea ‘Tomtoumtomtoumtomtoum’; the ‘Cage’ of an uncomfortable wholeness. The of Sound Art’s past. I hear hindsight. reconciliation of sonic arts past with its ‘Bwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa’; the future seems like an empirical illusion. sound of sonic arts future. Ennioa Neoptolomus A History of Sound Art - A5 24pp symbols.indd 2 24/1/11 14.35.29 » Brandon LaBelle » Marcel Duchamp Interview 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 Early Practices Dada » Enrico Caruso o sole mio » Janet Cardiff » Hugo Ball Karawane (1916) » Thomas Alva Edison Dickson Sound Film (1897) CATHY LANE Composer and sound designer.
    [Show full text]
  • Queer Abstraction
    UNDER CONSTRUCTION PERFORMING CRITICAL IDENTITY EDITED BY MARIE-ANNE KOHL Under Construction State of the Arts–Reflecting Contemporary Cultural Expression Volumes in the series: Under Construction: Performing Critical Identity ISBN 978-3-03897-499-4 (Hbk); ISBN 978-3-03897-500-7 (PDF) Self-Representation in an Expanded Field: From Self-Portraiture to Selfie, Contemporary Art in the Social Media Age ISBN 978-3-03897-564-9 (Hbk); ISBN 978-3-03897-565-6 (PDF) Marie-Anne Kohl (Ed.) Under Construction Performing Critical Identity MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tianjin •Tokyo • Cluj EDITOR Marie-Anne Kohl Research Institute for Music Theater Studies, University of Bayreuth, Thurnau, Germany EDITORIAL OFFICE MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated below: Author 1, and Author 2. 2021. Chapter Title. In Under Construction: Performing Critical Identity. Edited by Marie-Anne Kohl. Basel: MDPI, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03897-499-4 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03897-500-7 (PDF) ISSN: 2624-9839 (Print); ISSN: 2624-9847 (Online) doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-03897-500-7 Cover image adapted from work by Mamba Azul–stock.adobe.com. © 2021 by the authors. Chapters in this volume are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book taken as a whole is © 2021 MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonic Thinking How Sound-Art Practices Teach Us Critical Listening to Space
    Invisible Places 18–20JULY 2014, VISEU, PORTUGAL Sonic Thinking How Sound-art practices Teach Us Critical Listening to Space Elen Flügge [email protected] New York, USA / Berlin, Germany Abstract This paper proposes that sound art works (or sonic artistic practices) can encourage audito- ry conscientiousness and thus foster stronger concepts for the future of urban sonic envi- ronments. Artists and their works can do this both by revealing ways that urban spaces could sound as well as reflecting ways that we could listen. Founding the discussion in practices of the soundscape movement a few case studies will be considered, including installations (sounding and silent), soundwalk and interactive (artist research) approaches. Keywords: Sound Art, Soundscape, Listening, Ear Cleaning, Sonic Commons, Acoustic Ecol- ogy, Urban Sound Space provisional version 1. Sound and City Planning Sound art practices, including public installations, somposition, performance, and so-called ‘silent’ sound works can be valuable means for developing auditory awareness of urban envi- ronments. Such works can teach us to ‘think with our ears’ – a prerequisite skill for effective urban sound planning. From the side of urban planning there has also been growing recognition that sound should be taken into account in city development. A prime example is Max Dixon who was brought as a sound consultant for the recent “Sounder City” action planning in London. Dix- on suggests that the (potential) sound of city space should be taken into account from the onset of urban planning projects and, further, that sound should be approached by planners in a positive manner.1 Before a concept of a desired future sonic environment can be constructively integrated into the shaping of new urban sound environments, an understanding of already-present sound spaces – as well as the nature of being a listening agent – must be further developed and deepened.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo Music Journal [1])
    IntroductIon LMJ 23: Sound Art What’s in a name? That which we call “Music” is judged by the full weight of history and fashion; substitute “Sound Art” and most of these preconceptions fall away. As recently as a decade ago the reaction instead might have been bemusement. The term Sound Art was coined in the late 1960s to describe sonic activities taking place outside the concert hall: interactive installations, listening walks, environmental recordings, open duration sound events—even “happenings” and performance art were occasionally lumped under this rubric. For many years Sound Art remained an interstitial activity, falling between music and visual art, embraced fully by neither. Many composers viewed self-styled Sound Artists as failed mem- bers of their own club pursuing “a career move . a branding exercise” (as Chris Mann is quoted as saying in Ricardo Arias’s contribution to this volume of Leonardo Music Journal [1]). Most museums and galleries, in turn, shied away from an art form that was often stunningly unvisual even by the standards of Conceptual Art and for which there appeared to be no mar- ket. (Gallery assistants often found it very irritating to boot.) By 2013, however, Sound Art clearly has been accepted as an identifiable musical genre, an art world commodity, and a subject of critical study. Its newfound visibility can be traced to a number of aesthetic, technological and economic factors. First and foremost, I suspect, is the ubiquity of video in contemporary life: On the heels of the ever-declining price of camcord- ers, cellphone cameras have brought the world—from out-of-tune Van Halen concerts to the Arab Spring—to our laptops, and every video clip is invariably accompanied by sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Art As Media Art Legacy: Documentation of an Endangered Practice
    SOUND ART AS MEDIA ART LEGACY: DOCUMENTATION OF AN ENDANGERED PRACTICE by Ina Čiumakova Master Thesis submitted: 09 August 2018 Master Thesis author: Ina Čiumakova Thesis supervisor: Assoc. Prof. MORTEN SØNDERGAARD Aalborg University Standard pages: 97 pages (174, 360 characters incl. spaces) © Copyright by author 2 DECRALATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH GOOD SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE By signing this declaration, I confirm that the master’s thesis submitted by me was done, to the best of my belief, in accordance with good scientific practice (according to the Aalborg University guidelines and practice in the area), and that I am aware of and agree that the finding of serious violations of good scientific practice will be handled according to the faculty guidelines and will preclude a positive assessment of the dissertation and/or possibly result in the revocation of the degree awarded to me. PLEASE USE CAPITAL LETTERS TO FILL IN THIS FORM Full name: INA CIUMAKOVA Title of the MT thesis: SOUND ART AS MEDIA ART LEGACY: DOCUMENTATION OF AN ENDANGERED PRACTICE August 9, 2018 Date and signature 3 ABSTRACT The subject of this academic research is the documentation practice related to the interactive sound art installations and sound art environments. In this thesis sound art is analysed from the media arts perspective. In terms of preservation and theoretical contextualization, sound art is considered to be an endangered practice and this study aims to identify which elements of the practice are at risk and why. To approach the subject, first, the research aims to define what elements differentiate sound art installations and sound art environments from traditional visual art and music.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Art in America: Cage and Beyond
    Sound Art in America: Cage and Beyond “Sound Art”? In American art discourse, “sound art” is a thorny label. Practi tioners shy away from it, preferring to call themselves simply “artists” or “composers.” Critics often reject the phrase as well in favour of more generic descriptions such as “sound in the arts” or “the sonic arts.” Curators, too, are reluctant to put those two words side by side in exhibition titles.1 The reasons for this wariness seem to be twofold: (1) that “sound art” might just be a passing fad with which soon no one will want to have been associated, and (2) that the description is too narrow to capture work that invariably involves more than sound. In a statement written as wall text for the 2000 exhibition Volume: Bed of Sound at MoMA PS1 in New York City, the American pioneer of sound installation Max Neuhaus leveled both these arguments against the label. After declaring the flurry of sound­themed exhibitions to be “an art fad,” he dismissed the phrase “sound art” as a category mistake, the equivalent of grouping everything from steel sculpture to steel guitar music under the title “steel art.”2 Christoph Cox 51 Ye t, for all that, “sound art” keeps sneaking back into the discourse – and for good reason. While no more adequate to its content than the terms “video art” or “performance” are to describe the wild variety of work that falls under those labels, “sound art” helpfully marks the fact that, in the past two decades or so, sound has indeed become more prominent in venues of contemporary art in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Or Sound
    ART OR SOUND 2x4_FP_ArtOrSound_Images_v2.indd 1 20/05/14 16.10 2x4_FP_ArtOrSound_Images_v2.indd 2 20/05/14 16.10 ART OR SOUND CURATED BY GERMANO CELANT 2x4_FP_ArtOrSound_Images_v2.indd 3 20/05/14 16.10 2x4_FP_ArtOrSound_Images_v2.indd 4 20/05/14 16.10 In keeping with Fondazione Prada’s aim to broaden its cultural scope, the exhibition “Art or Sound” addresses, for the first time, artistic creation that lies on the boundary between the visual arts and sound production, as well as the ways in which these two fields interact. We began by investigating the Renaissance as it is the origin of a contemporary approach that, by extending its roots into the past, alters its cultural structures and categories. A closer review of what may at first appear secondary—like the decoration of a musical instrument or the suggested resonance of a painting—reconstructs a history, retold in its manifold forms, that demonstrates the ongoing interest in the convergence and exchange of ideas between disciplines. An object of focus has been the ambiguity that arises out of the relationship between the object and sound, and whether the resulting artifact is considered to have the characteristics —depending on the moment, context and interpretation of the viewer—of a work of art or musical instrument. In the exhibition at Ca’ Corner della Regina, as in this book, art and music are not the only two elements interwoven. There are also notions of light and sound, writing and movement, sculpture and instrument, as well as the work of the artists and craftsmen who have produced hybrid, equivocal objects whose physical presence and sound production simultaneously activate our senses.
    [Show full text]
  • Ken Feingold Figures of Spee
    | Honorowy Patronat Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej Bronisława Komorowskiego | Honorary Patronage of the President of the Republic of Poland Bronisław Komorowski Publikacja towarzyszy wystawie KEN FEINGOLD: Figury mowy – skradzione głosy zorganizowanej przez Gdańską Galerię Miejską we współpracy z Centrum Sztuki Współczesnej ŁAŹNIA w ramach projektu Art+Science Meeting w dniach 18 maja–13 lipca 2014 The publication accompanies the exhibition KEN FEINGOLD: Figures of Speech – Stolen Voices organised by the Gdańsk City Gallery in cooperation with the LAZNIA Centre for Contemporary Art in Gdańsk as part of the Art+Science Meeting project 18 May–13 July 2014 kurator | curated by Ryszard W. Kluszczyński KEN FEINGOLD: Figury mowy KEN FEINGOLD: Figures of Speech Centrum Sztuki Współczesnej Łaźnia Laznia Centre for Contemporary Art 2014 redaktor | edited by Ryszard W. Kluszczyński Spis treści Contents Ryszard W. Kluszczyński Znajdując siebie w innych. Wstępne refleksje na temat twórczości Kena Feingolda | Finding Oneself in Others. Introductory Reflections on Ken Feingold’s Art 6 | Ken Feingold Figury mowy | Figures of Speech 24 | Erkki Huhtamo Z ust lalki, niejasno. O sztuce Kena Feingolda | From The Puppet’s Mouth, Darkly. About Ken Feingold’s Art 36 | Ewa Wójtowicz Pisanie tożsamości. Sztuka wobec sztucznej inteligencji – Kena Feingolda „Figury mowy” | Writing Personalities. Art Vis-à-vis Artificial Intelligence – Ken Feingold’s “Figures of Speech” 76 | Edward Shanken Miłość to dobry początek. Rozmowa z Kenem Feingoldem | Love Is a Good Place to Start. Interview with Ken Feingold 108 | Biogramy | Biographies 138 | Znajdując siebie w innych Wstępne refleksje na temat twórczości Kena Feingolda Finding Oneself in Others Introductory Reflections on Ken Feingold’s Art Ryszard W.
    [Show full text]
  • NOISE & Whispers
    A catalogue to support the exhibition of the same name at GV Art gallery, London 7 November to 14 December 2013 Introduction On the 11th of March 1913 the insightful Futurist Luigi paralleled by the increasing proliferation of Thank you for listening. Russolo wrote a letter to Francesco Balilla Pratella that machinery...” Martin A. Smith became known as “L'arte dei Rumori”, The Art Of And so, the notion of using noise as art was Noises. The letter became a manifesto, calling on London, October 2013 crystallised. Over a hundred years ago, the composer composers to "enlarge and enrich the field of sound", spoke to his friend of reaching out beyond the to create sound as art. confines of traditional instruments to “break at all cost Quotes from L'arte dei Rumori by Luigi Russolo from this restrictive circle of pure sounds and conquer In his letter, Russolo reflected: translated by Robert Filliou the infinite variety of noise-sounds.” “For several centuries, life went on silently, or mutedly. The loudest noises were neither intense, nor prolonged The term “sound art” went on to surface in 1983 in an nor varied. In fact, nature is normally silent, except for exhibition by William Hellerman at The Sculpture storms, hurricanes, avalanches, cascades and some Center in New York. True to Russolo’s vision, the art of exceptional telluric movements. This is why man was noise has been driven forward by human impulsion, thoroughly amazed by the first sounds he obtained out gathering pace in keeping with the heightening speed of a hole in reeds or a stretched string.
    [Show full text]
  • WANG Yingzi, Shanghai University L Aunched by George Maciunas
    WANG Yingzi, Shanghai University Originating from the rebel spirit of Dadaism and the experimental music results of John Cage and others, Fluxus has concluded the noise in sound art, which rarely participates in the traditional arts. It has also brought specific things from daily life which people routinely ignore to the art stage, has promoted the fusion of the arts, and has raised the relationship between the noise and sound art. Further- more, it has initiated the discussion of sound and hearing problems such as the sub- jectivity of thinking. Fluxus; Sound Art; Noise; Categories Fusion aunched by George Maciunas and involving George Brecht, NamJune Paik, La L Monte Thornton Young and others in the 1960s, Fluxus combined many ele- ments such as the concept of industrial technology products, accidental behavior, and audience participation of to create various forms of art. The use of noise in sound art and fusing artistic characteristics in particular ways is particularly note- worthy. In all of the activities and movements of Fluxus, sound artworks occupy a very large proportion. Fluxus artists are deeply influenced by Dadaism and take the rebel spirit to the extreme. In the sound art of Fluxus, there is an important part of cre- ation called 野subversion冶 tendency, which mainly concerns not only the mainstay for sound art in music, but the daily life and industrial production of noise, given its unique artistic meaning. Wang Yingzi, doctor of College of Liberal Arts, Shanghai University, specialized on audi- tory culture and sound aesthetics. 窑42窑 The daily life aesthetics and occasional art in Fluxus are closely related to Mar- cel Duchamp爷s semi-finished product creation concept.
    [Show full text]