Conducting a Dynamic Competitor Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Marko Ruotsalainen Conducting a Dynamic Competitor Analysis A Proposal for Robust CA Toolkit Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Master’s Degree Industrial Management Master’s Thesis 11 May 2016 Abstract Marko Ruotsalainen Author Conducting a Dynamic Competitor Analysis: A Proposal for Title Robust CA Toolkit Number of Pages 74 pages + 9 appendices Date 11 May 2016 Degree Master of Engineering Degree Programme Degree Programme in Industrial Management Instructors Thomas Rohweder, DSc (Econ), Principal Lecturer Zinaida Grabovskaia, PhL, Senior Lecturer This focus of this study is to propose a robust Toolkit for a Dynamic Competitor Analysis (CA) for the case organization. The case organization’s High Voltage business unit is in fierce completion with multinational stakeholders in Finland. The overall market situation continues to be challenging, and three major global players dominate the high voltage equip- ment market. Due to the pessimistic macroeconomic expectations, the growth potential of the electric industry is expected to continue relatively low worldwide until 2020. Thus, stake- holders continuously compete to guarantee their mid-term and long-term success. The approach that this Thesis suggests is to move away from its current reactive utilization of existing competitor analysis. So far, the responsibility of CA related activities and its anal- ysis have been at the headquarters, while the case organization has supported these activ- ities by collecting basic competitor and market data. The results of the study show that the competitor analysis can be conducted robustly and dynamically if systematically utilized. The word “dynamic” means that the competitor analy- sis is conducted whenever needed and, more importantly, timely. In this study the word “robust” means the suitable tools and methods used for CA, and, importantly, CA that is conducted legally and ethically. The proposal suggests a range of such tools but stresses that it is the business issue(s) that should determine which CA methods and tools should be used. Presently, the case organization has broader level BI system in use that focuses is on competitive positioning. One of the key tasks of the CA Toolkit should be to support the BI needs. The case organization can benefit from the results of the study in multiple ways. First, the CA analysis increases the understanding of industry structure. Second, active utilization of CA Toolkit increases the quality of BI data. Third, the competitor analysis can minimize the risks of decision-making. If successful, the CA Toolkit proposal can be leveraged in other BU’s. Keywords Competitor Analysis, Competitive Intelligence, Business Intel- ligence, industry structure analysis, critical success factors, competitive profile matrix. Contents Abstract Table of Contents List of Figures List of Tables Acronyms 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Key Concepts of This Study 1 1.2 Case Company Background 2 1.3 Business Challenge 3 1.4 Objective and Scope 4 2 Method and Material 5 2.1 Research Approach 5 2.2 Research Design 6 2.3 Data Collection and Analysis 9 2.4 Reliability and Validity Plan 14 3 Current State Analysis 16 3.1 Overview of the Current State Analysis Stage 16 3.2 Findings from the Current State Analysis 17 Company Business Intelligence Process 17 Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 18 Net Promoter Score ™ (NPS) 19 Battle Cards 20 Ad-hoc Surveys and Benchmarking 20 Trade Shows, Seminars, and Conferences 21 Other Sources, and the Current Process and Tools of Conducting Competitor Analysis 21 3.3 Impact of Business Conduct Guidelines on Competitor Analysis Practices 23 Legal Perspective 23 Compliance Perspective 24 3.4 Summary of Key Findings from the Current State Analysis 25 4 Existing Knowledge on Competitor Analysis 28 4.1 Definition of Competitor Analysis 28 Competitor Analysis as Part of Competitive Intelligence 29 The Case for Competitor Analysis 31 4.2 Competitor Analysis Methods and Techniques 35 “Five Forces” Industry Structure Analysis Method 35 Framework for Competitor Analysis 37 Critical Evaluation of Porter’s Insights 41 4.3 Tools for Competitor Analysis 42 SWOT Analysis 42 Critical Success Factors Analysis 44 The Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) 45 4.4 Conceptual Framework of This Study 46 5 Conducting a Dynamic Competitor Analysis 50 5.1 Overview of the Proposal Building Stage 50 5.2 Findings of Data Collection 2 51 5.3 CA Process with Tools: Planning and Direction 53 [A.1] Define the Business Issue(s) 53 [A.2] Identifying Competitors 54 [A.3] Identifying Stakeholders and Information Need 55 [A.4] Check the Responsibility Matrix 56 5.4 CA Process with Tools: Data Collection 57 [A.5] Determine Sources of Competitive Data 58 [A.6] Gather /Organize the Data 59 5.5 CA Process with Tools: Analysis 60 [B.1] Choose from Appropriate CA Methods and Tools 60 [C.1] Analyze and Produce Actionable intelligence 61 5.6 CA Process with Tools: Dissemination 65 [C.2] Communicate Results & Findings to the Stakeholders 65 [C.3] Receive feedback and re-evaluate 66 6 Validation of the Proposal 67 6.1 Findings of Data Collection 3 67 6.2 Suggestions and Future Improvements 68 A. Reporting of the CA Toolkit Results 68 B. The CA as a Part of Account Planning Process 68 C. Adapting of CA Toolkit to Other BU’s Use 69 D. Competitor Analysis Practitioner’s Checklist 69 7 Discussion and Conclusions 70 7.1 Summary 70 7.2 Practical and Managerial Implications 72 7.3 Evaluation of the Study 73 Outcome vs Objective 73 Reliability and Validity 74 References 75 Appendix 1: Research Participants’ Information Document Appendix 2: Interview: Legal and Compliance (Data Collection 1) Appendix 3: Interview: BU Manager (Data Collection 1) Appendix 4: Interview: Head of Division (Data Collection 1) Appendix 5: Interview: Sales Director (Data Collection 1, 2 and 3) Appendix 6: Interview: Sales Engineer (Data Collection 2 and 3) Appendix 7: Net Promoter Score (NPS) Appendix 8: Industry Fusion Analysis Appendix 9: Competitor Analysis Practitioner’s Checklist List of Figures Figure 1. Research design of this study Figure 2. The Case Organization’s current CI value creation and benefits process Figure 3. The Entire Competitive Environment Figure 4. Competitive Intelligence Process Figure 5. CI Value and Benefits Framework Figure 6. Competitive Advantage and the three C’s Model Figure 7. Customer Value Triad Model Figure 8. The Five Forces That Shape Industry Competition Figure 9. The Elements of a Competitor Analysis Figure 10. Specification of SWOT Variables and Development of Strategy to Improve Marches Figure 11. CSFs Identification and Monitoring Figure 12. The literature review Figure 13. Conceptual Framework of this study Figure 14. The industry fusion analysis method Figure 15. Key Drivers for B2B Customer Loyalty Figure 16. Leveraging the CA collaboration of sales and Management List of Tables Table 1. Steps in research design Table 2. An overview of Data Collection Rounds of this Study Table 3. Data Collection for the current state analysis, Data 1 Table 4. Data collection for the proposal building Table 5. Data collection of the testing and validation of the CA Toolkit Table 6. Usefulness of Competitor Analysis based on practical experiences Table 7. Predicting Competitor’s Reaction Table 8. Analyzing of Competitor’s Reaction Table 9. Critical Success Factors Analysis Worksheet Table 10. The Competitive Profile Matrix Table 11. Initial structure of the proposed CA Toolkit Table 12. Summary of Data Collection 2: Feedback and comments on initial CA Toolkit proposal Table 13. Business issue questions of this study Table 14. The Case Organization’s Competitor Table 15. Stakeholder Profiles Table 16. Responsibility Matrix Table 17. Type of Acknowledged Data Source Table 18. Type of data sources used in this study Table 19. Organizing of Data Sources and Information Table 20. Critical Success Factor Table 21. Insights on defining weighted factors of CSFs (Focus: B2B customer loyalty and purchasing factors) Table 22. The Competitive Profile Matrix Table 23. Content of CA report Acronyms 3C’s Customers-Competitors-Company Model ABI/INFORM Academic Literature Database AIS Air Insulated Switchgear B2B Business to Business BI Business Intelligence BU Business Unit CA Competitor Analysis CI Competitive Intelligence CPM The Competitive Profile Matrix CRM Customer Relationship Management CSA Current State Analysis CSFs Critical Success Factors analysis tool DB Database EBSCOHost Academic Literature Database GIS Gas Insulated Switchgear HQ Headquarter M&A Mergers & Acquisitions NDA Non-Disclosure Agreement; a legal contract between the case organization and a business partner that protects the confidential in- formation of one or both parties. NPS® Net Promoter Score™; to evaluate customer loyalty. PEST Political, economic, social, and technological factors. Another method to conduct environmental analysis SAP Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing STEEP Social, technological, economic, ecological, and political factors. The method is used to make an environmental analysis. SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis USPs Unique Selling Propositions 1 1 Introduction This study focuses on analyzing the competitor analysis practices of the case organization and improving its current competitor analysis processes and tools. Knowing what competition is doing is essential to any company that want to survive. Marketing strategist Jack Trout, the president of Trout & Partners, argue: Customer orientation is necessary