Vol. Xii. 2014. Full Text
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SERIES BYZANTINA Virgin Mary; glassware decoration, from catacombs in Rome, 4th c. AD; N. P. Kondakov, Ikonografi a Bogomateri, St. Petersburg 1914, p. 77 SERIES BYZANTINA Studies on Byzantine and Post -Byzantine Art VOLUME XII POLISH INSTITUTE OF WORLD ART STUDIES CARDINAL STEFAN WYSZYŃSKI UNIVERSITY Warsaw 2014 EDITOR: Waldemar Deluga EDITORIAL BOARD: Anca Bratuleanu, Bucharest Viktoria Bulgakova, Berlin Ana Dumitran, Alba Iulia Mat Immerzeel, Amsterdam Michał Janocha (chairman), Warsaw Catherine Jolivet-Levy, Paris Alina Kondratjuk, Kiev Magdalena Łaptaś, Warsaw Jerzy Malinowski, Warsaw Márta Nagy, Debrecen Daniela Rywikova, Ostrava Athanassios Semoglou, Thessaloniki Tania Tribe, London Natasha Tryfanava, Minsk ADMINISTRATOR: Dominika Macios WEBMASTER: Rafał Zapłata EDITORIAL ADDRESS: Institut of History of Art Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University ul. Wóycickiego 1/3 PL 01-938 Warszawa [email protected] Revised by Nicholas Barber, Anette and Denis Morin Cover design, typhographic project, illustrations editing and typesetting by Paweł Wróblewski Continuation of the series published by the NERITON Publishing House The issue subsidized by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Program „Index Plus”) © Copyright by Waldemar Deluga ISSN 1733–5787 Printed by Sowa - Druk na Życzenie www.sowadruk.pl tel. (48 22) 431 81 40 Edition of 400 copies Contents Introduction (Waldemar Deluga).................................................................................................7 Agnieszka Gronek, Eschatological elements in the schemes of paintings of high iconostases..........................................................................11 Natalia Kolpakova, Saint George: Artistic and stylistic peculiarities of Galician Icons in the 14th–16th Centuries............................................................23 Rémi Terryn, L’ église de Treskavac et ses peintures murales et liens avec l « école » de Kastoria à la fi n du XVème siècle.....................................................35 Ika Matyjaszkiewicz, Human – Absolute – Painting. Golden Apses in Byzantine Art and in Venetian Painting of Renaissance.........................................................55 Waldemar Deluga, Between Candia and Venice. The role of European engravings in the iconographic transformations of post-Byzantine painting in Greece..........................................................................................75 Introduction Volume XII of Series Byzantina presents papers that emerged from continued dialogue amongst researchers from different countries. Considerable space has been devoted to ar- tistic relations between the Byzantine and Latin worlds, which is a continuation of discus- sions contained in the previous issues. Opened in 2014 has been a new gallery of Nubian art from the Faras Cathedral, show- ing the relics of Christian art in a new arrangement adapted to the modern exhibition solutions, and fi rst of all – meeting the standards of appropriate heritage protection. The exhibition is a success of Polish archaeologists and historians of art and new excavation sites related to Eastern Christianity in Africa have been discovered. This way, there is con- tinuity in the works that have been performed for over a hundred years by many archaeo- logical missions. Therefore we would like to present such issues in our periodical. In 2014, the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, in cooperation with scholars from other Polish research centres, organised a conference on the migration of relics during the fi rst millennium. One year earlier, on the initiative of Magdalena Łaptaś, a discussion panel was held at the International Centre for Cross-cultural and Cross-religious dialogue. It was then that the basic assumptions of the future conference had been prepared: it was a national event that grouped researchers into epochs before the division into the Latin and Byzantine worlds. The Centre, headed by Rev. Henryk Skorowski, is now expanding its activities to include suggestions offered by historians of art. The interest in Byzantine and post-Byzantine art is growing in Eastern Europe, and new initiatives keep springing up. Worthy of attention among them are the artistic activi- ties of modern artists who create new works inspired by the old art. Workshops in icon painting are organized. In Poland, a School of Iconography operates in Biała Podlaska. Further, painting workshops are held in Nowica and Garbatka in southern Poland, where the Eastern Church traditionally mingles with the Latin one, and historic wooden Latin and Orthodox churches coexist. Tangible survivors of the ravages of war and communist persecutions, they attract both the faithful and tourists visiting the region. Icon painters representing such communities symbolise the traditional trend of Orthodox Church paint- ing related to the icon canon. 8 Introduction Fig. 1. The Professor Kazimierz Michałowski Faras Gallery, National Museum, Warsaw Fig. 2. The Professor Kazimierz Michałowski Faras Gallery, National Museum, Warsaw Introduction 9 Fig. 3. Church at Old Dongola, drawing, 1906, The Griffi th Institute Archive, Oxford Fig. 4. Ruins at the Old Dongola 10 Introduction Fig. 5. Olena Smaha, A Fragment of The Nativ- Fig. 6. Natalka Sazyk, The Pochaiv Virgin, 2007, ity of Christ Diptych, 2005, wood distemper wood distemper Many artists from Ukraine take part in the Polish initiatives; to them, modern sacral art in Poland is a source of inspiration. In particular is the art of Jerzy Nowosielski, who is well known amongst modern artists whom decorate Orthodox churches and his works have been exhibited in Ukraine and other countries of the region. Paradoxically, the once unwanted icons of 1960s and 1970s, painted for village Orthodox churches in Poland, are now becoming the canon for modern sacral painting in Ukraine (fi g. 2-4). We would like to discuss such issues in our periodical, and hence why articles on modern Orthodox Church art will be published in the future. The periodical Series Byzantina is greatly appreciated internationally, and highly po- sitioned in the Copernicus index. This is, to us, a great honour; at the same time, we strive after broadening the platform of scholarly discourse, which also includes online. Our fi rst attempts at grouping researchers, mainly from Eastern Europe, was on a website organized by Valery Bulgakov.1 The site still has visitors today and we want to revert to that formula, and publish full contents of the previous volumes on our online sites (Polish Institute of World Art Studies2 and Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University3). This will thereby make our periodicals more accessible on the international forum. Waldemar Deluga 1 http://www.archaeology.kiev.ua/ 2 http://series-byzantina.world-art.pl/ 3 http://www.ihs.uksw.edu.pl/ Series Byzantina XII, pp. 11–21 Eschatological elements in the schemes of paintings of high iconostases Agnieszka Gronek, Jagiellonian University, Cracow The primary division of a Christian church into two parts, alluding in form to an antique Roman basilica, and in ideas to Salomon’s temple, had already been interpreted symbolically in Mistagogia by Maximus the Confessor. This saint theologian who derived neo-platonic ideas from the writings of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, and who referred to the Jewish tradition, understood a church as a depiction of cosmos, divided into a visible and invisible world, earthly and heavenly, bodily and spiritual.1 No wonder, therefore, that the barrier on the border of these two spheres also acquired a symbolic meaning. In the times of Maximus the Confessor it was open-work, and the fabrics hung between its columns were drawn open for the liturgy.2 Thus, during the service, the faithful, even though they were standing in the nave and, in line with Canon 69 of the Fifth and Sixth Council in Trullo, not allowed entry to the sanctuary3 – had a chance to participate fully in the mystery of the Eucharist, by observing all its phases. Already in the fi rst chapters of Mistagogia by Maximus it is easy to fi nd a similar idea of the dichotomy of unity, referring both to the sacral space, unifi ed though divided into the presbytery and the nave, and to the universe – one universum, consisting of the earthly and heavenly spheres. This sym- bolic analogy was also extended to the man, consisting of a body and a soul, and to the soul destined for lower and higher aims.4 1 Patrologia Graeca, ed. J.P. Migne, vol. 91, chapter 2–4, pp. 667–672. 2 A. Różycka Bryzek, ‘Symbolika bizantyńskiej architektury sakralnej’, in: Losy w cerkwi w Polsce po 1944 roku. Materiały z sesji naukowej Stowarzyszenia Historyków Sztuki pt. „Tragedia polskich cerkwi” w Rzeszowie, Rzeszów 1997, pp. 75–76. 3 A. Znosko, Kanony Kościoła Prawosławnego, vol. I, Hajnówka 2000, p. 96. 4 Patrologia Graeca, vol. 91, chapter 2–4, pp. 667–672. 12 Agnieszka Gronek Changes in the liturgy at the end of the fi rst millennium, caused by the iconoclastic shock, aimed to increase the mystery of the rituals and, at the same time, deepen a sense of God’s unattainability and non-cognisance. It was then that the templon, a purely ar- chitectural structure, began to be adorned with fi gural representations carved in the architrave beam and fl agstones placed on the stylobate, or with painted or mosaic pic- tures hung on and between columns.5 They they primarily became the main medium for conveying deeper nuances. But even earlier the very structure of a templon, as well as the fact that it was placed at the boundary of two complementary spaces, fi