2019 1 “A City Is More Than a Place on a Map
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
76 Unit Mixed-Income Housing
WinnDevelopment completes 142,000 s/f phase 1 of Manomet Place rehab; 76 unit mixed-income housing June 27, 2013 - Spotlights John Keith, principal owner and general contractor, and WinnDevelopment, the real estate development arm of WinnCompanies and project developer, completed Phase 1 of Manomet Place Formerly known as both Cliftex Mill and Manomet Mill, a 20th century cotton textile mill complex, the property is now home to 76 units of mixed-income housing for seniors age 55 and older. Partners WinnDevelopment and Keith celebrated this major rehabilitation project with a ribbon-cutting ceremony, where they were joined by local and state officials, including Jonathan Mitchell, mayor of New Bedford; Aaron Gornstein, undersecretary of the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD); Matthew Morrissey, executive director of the New Bedford Economic Development Council; Steven Martins, president of the New Bedford City Council; and John Saunders, councillor-at-large of the New Bedford City Council. Winn worked with the Department of Housing & Community Development (DHCD), the City of New Bedford, Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency (MassHousing), National Park Service (NPS), and the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) to finance this project. Additionally, Winn secured private construction financing from Bank of America and Boston Community Loan Fund (BCLF). The project's architect was The Architectural Team out of Chelsea, Mass. and the contractor was Keith Construction out of Canton, Mass. WinnResidential will serve as the property manager for Manomet Place. "The 76 new units being offered to seniors at Manomet Place represent some of the best housing of its kind in the city. This is good news for the seniors that will live here, but it's also good news for the city as we demonstrate again that New Bedford is a city on the move," said mayor Mitchell. -
¨§¦95 ¨§¦90 ¨§¦84 ¨§¦91 ¨§¦93
FEDERAL HISTORIC TAX CREDIT PROJECTS Massachusetts A total of 643 Federal Historic Tax Credit projects (certified by the National Park Service) and $962,196,933 in federal Historic Tax Credits between fiscal year 2001 through 2020, leveraged an estimated $5,532,632,364 in total development. Data source: National Park Service, 2020 Amesbury2 Haverhill 95 9 ¦¨§ Methuen Williamstown Lawrence54 2North Andover North Adams Montague (Turner Falls) 29 Andover Ipswich Fitchburg Westford 3Turners Falls Groton Lowell 7 Athol 2 3 2 ¦¨§93 Beverly Essex Gloucester Greenfield Millers Falls Ayer 2 Billerica Gardner 3 Peabody Leominster Harvard Stoneham 29Salem Lexington 2 Acton2 4Lynn 11 Delton 190 Pittsfield ¦¨§91 ¦¨§ 2 3 Watertown2 Nahant Amherst 2 Clinton 5 Waltham2 2 6 Winthrop Marlborough 3 Lenox Northampton3 198 FraminghamChestnut Hill 2 Lee Worcester 3 4 Boston Stockbridge 33 2 7 90 Easthampton Ware Westborough Dorchester ¦¨§ Holyoke Dedham 2 Chicopee5 ¦¨§290 Milton Great 2¦¨§291 Upton Weymouth Westfield 7 Ludlow 395 Uxbridge Sharon Rockland Barrington 72 ¦¨§ Hanover 84 Northbridge 2 2 7 ¦¨§ Foxborough Whitman Springfield Easton Feeding Hills Webster ¦¨§295 ¦¨§495 Plymouth 2 Taunton Middleborough Bourne 10 Fall River 195 ¦¨§ 30 Yarmouth New Bedford Waquoit Fairmouth Federal Historic Tax Credit Projects Oak Bluffs 1 6 - 10 2 - 5 11 and over 4 Nantucket Provided by the National Trust for Historic Preservation 0 5 10 20 30 and the Historic Tax Credit Coalition Miles R For more information, contact Shaw Sprague, NTHP Vice President for Government Relations -
Attachment E, Vol. 8
Cente Volume VIII of WAS - VIII. NATURAL RESOURCE INJURY 17000. In order to determine if injury to a natural resource has been caused by any additional, individual type of pollutant, it is necessary to compare the condition of the natural resource before the addition of the pollutant with the condition of the natural resource after the addition of the pollutant. 17001. The condition of a natural resource prior to the addition of the new pollutant at issue is termed the base line condition of the natural resource. 17002. In order to determine if a pollutant caused injury to a natural resource, and in order to quantify any such injury to a natural resource, it is necessary to* know the base line condition of the natural resource. 17003. Natural resource injury cannot be proven to have been caused by the addition of any individual type of pollutant without determining whether any incremental injury to the natural resource or further lost use has occurred in addition to any injury or lost use of the natural resource due to base line pollution conditions. 17004. If users of a natural resource would not change their use of the natural resource if the pollutant at issue, such as PCBs, were removed from the natural resource, and all other pollutants remained constant, then no injury to or lost use of the natural resource exists caused by such an additional pollutant. 17005. If the base line condition of the natural resource is not known, then it cannot be determined whether any injury has occurred to the natural resource through the addition of any additional pollutant. -
New Bedford Riverwalk Report
New Bedford Riverwalk Planning & Design City of New Bedford, Massachusetts Environmental Stewardship Prepared by: BSC Group and Shadley Associates 4.1.1 Bench with Back ........................................................................................................................................ 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................... I 4.1.2 Backless Bench .......................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1.3 Litter Bin .................................................................................................................................................... 28 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 4.1.4 Bicycle Parking Post .................................................................................................................................. 29 4.1.5 Pedestrian Light ........................................................................................................................................ 29 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 1 4.2 MATERIALS AND PAVEMENTS ................................................................................................................................... 30 1.1.1 Project Intent ..............................................................................................................................................