DOCSLIB.ORG

Solving the ‘First Mile Problem’ Opportunities for Bike-Transit Integration in Edmonton, Alberta by Derek Yau

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solving the ‘First Mile Problem’ Opportunities for Bike-Transit Integration in Edmonton, Alberta by Derek Yau Solving the ‘First Mile Problem’ Opportunities for bike-transit integration in Edmonton, Alberta by Derek Yau A practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF CITY PLANNING Department of City Planning Faculty of Architecture University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2016 Derek Yau Abstract In an effort to shift reliance away from single-occupancy vehicles, many cities have been investing in active and public transportation, and promoting multi-modal travel. It has been recognized both academically and professionally that there is a need to address issues regarding access to transit stations and nodes – the ‘first mile problem.’ Many see bicycles as the answer to the first mile problem; however, scholarly literature has generally neglected exploring how to accommodate bicycles at different stations. This practicum investigates the first mile problem in Edmonton, Alberta, and identifies existing challenges with bicycle access to Edmonton’s Light Rail Transit (LRT) system. The findings suggest three distinct LRT ‘station types’, each requiring a nuanced suite of infrastructure improvements in order to encourage more bicycle access. Further, these improvements can only be realized through the development and execution of comprehensive policies and regulations that support cycling and bike-transit integration. [Keywords: Cycling, first mile problem, transit accessibility, active transportation, Edmonton] i Acknowledgements I would like to extend a sincere thanks to my advisor, Dr. Orly Linovski, for her invaluable guidance throughout the writing of this practicum. I would also like to thank committee members Dr. Rae Bridgman and the University of Alberta’s Dr. Amy Kim for their support and feedback. Thank you to the many survey and interview participants of this practicum as well. Your input added great depth and value to my research. This practicum could not have been completed without the support of my family in Richmond, British Columbia and Regina, Saskatchewan. To my friends and fellow classmates in Winnipeg whom I have gotten to know well over the past two years, thank you for your constant encouragement and loyalty. ii Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. ii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... iii List of Images ........................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ...........................................................................................................................vii 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Problem statement and research questions ................................................................................... 1 1.2 Research objectives and significance .............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Document structure .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Context ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Edmonton, Alberta ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Edmonton Light Rail Transit .......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Bike infrastructure in Edmonton .................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Edmonton’s urban context ............................................................................................................ 10 2.5 Edmonton as a case study .............................................................................................................. 14 3.0 Literature Review .......................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Sustainable and resilient cities ....................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Recent developments in sustainable transportation ................................................................... 18 3.3 The ‘first mile problem’ .................................................................................................................. 20 3.4 Bike-transit integration ................................................................................................................... 23 3.4.1 Bicycle access and egress ....................................................................................................... 26 3.4.2 Bike-transit integration policy ............................................................................................... 27 3.5 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 29 4.0 Research Methods......................................................................................................... 30 4.1 Case study research ......................................................................................................................... 30 4.2 Site analyses ...................................................................................................................................... 31 iii 4.3 Observations .................................................................................................................................... 32 4.3.1 Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 33 4.4 Surveys / Structured interviews .................................................................................................... 34 4.4.1 Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 35 4.5 Practitioner (semi-structured) interviews ..................................................................................... 35 4.5.1 Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 37 4.6 Limitations........................................................................................................................................ 38 4.7 Biases ................................................................................................................................................. 40 5.0 Findings ........................................................................................................................ 41 5.1 Site Analyses ..................................................................................................................................... 44 5.1.1 Northeast.................................................................................................................................. 44 5.1.2 Downtown ............................................................................................................................... 48 5.1.3 South ......................................................................................................................................... 51 5.1.4 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 56 5.2 Observations .................................................................................................................................... 56 5.2.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 58 5.3 Surveys .............................................................................................................................................. 59 5.3.1 Trip purpose ............................................................................................................................ 59 5.3.2 Boarding with bikes ................................................................................................................ 59 5.3.3 Access routes ........................................................................................................................... 60 5.3.4 Access distances ...................................................................................................................... 62 5.3.5 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 63 5.4 Station types ..................................................................................................................................... 64 5.4.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 66 5.5 Practitioner interviews ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Xxxii Olympic Games Team Selection Policy
    CYCLING CANADA XXXII OLYMPIC GAMES TEAM SELECTION POLICY JULY 24-AUG. 9, 2020, TOKYO, JAPAN DRAFT PUBLISHED APRIL 14, 2019 FINAL VERSION PUBLISHED JULY 15, 2019 REVIEWED BY THE CYCLING CANADA HIGH PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE, THE CYCLING CANADA ATHLETES COUNCIL AND THE CANADIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE 2020 Cycling Canada Olympic selection criteriA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY ............................................................................................................ 3 3. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION (IF) CRITERIA ........................................................................................ 3 4. ATHLETE ELIGIBILITY ............................................................................................................................. 4 5. SELECTION CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................. 4 6. OTHER FACTORS THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED IN SELECTION ............................................................. 12 7. EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES ........................................................................................................ 13 8. OTHER SELECTION MATTERS .............................................................................................................. 13 9. PERFORMANCE READINESS AND INJURIES ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling Canada
    CYCLING LTAD - VOLUME 1 1 CANADIAN CYCLING ASSOCIATION LONG-TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT VOLUME 1 2 CYCLING LTAD - VOLUME 1 All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or We acknowledge the financial support of transmitted in any form for commercial purposes, or by any means, the Government of Canada through Sport electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording or Canada, a branch of the Department of from any information stored in a retrieval system, without permission Canadian Heritage. from the authors or the Canadian Cycling Association. CCA Long-Term Athlete Development - Volume 1 February 2008 ISBN 978-0-9809082-0-6 LONG-TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CYCLING LTAD - VOLUME 1 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Acknowledgements 5 1 - Introduction 6 Guide to the LTAD Plan 7 2 - What is Long-Term Athlete Development? 8 The 10 Key Factors of LTAD 8 The 10 S’s of Training and Performance 10 Critical Periods of Development 13 Complementary Cycling Disciplines and Lifelong Physical Activity 14 Interrelationship of Cycling Disciplines 15 3 - Ages and Stages of Cycling’s LTAD 16 Long-term Development of Cyclists Stage by Stage 17 CCA Development Model for Athletes with a Disability (AWAD - Paralympic or Handisport) 26 4 - Summary 27 5 - References 28 Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations 29 Appendix 2- Critical Periods of Development 32 Appendix 3: Cycling Values Matrix 33 2 CYCLING LTAD - VOLUME 1 Executive Summary In early 2005, the Canadian Cycling Association (CCA) formed the LTAD Working Group to study ways to improve the development Canadian Cycling: Facts & Figures pathway for Canadian cyclists of all ages and all levels of ability and disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Boosting Women's Participation in Bicycling Through Adult Bicycle Skills
    Getting from here to there: Boosting women’s participation in bicycling through adult bicycle skills training by Stephanie Sersli M.A., York University, 2009 B.A. (Hons.), Simon Fraser University, 2003 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Doctor of Philosophy Program Faculty of Health Sciences © Stephanie Sersli 2020 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2020 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Declaration of Committee Name: Stephanie Sersli Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Thesis title: Getting from here to there: Boosting women’s participation in bicycling through adult bicycle skills training Committee: Chair: David Whitehurst Associate Professor, Health Sciences Meghan Winters Supervisor Associate Professor, Health Sciences Maya Gislason Committee Member Assistant Professor, Health Sciences Nicholas Scott Committee Member Associate Professor, Sociology and Anthropology Tiffany Myrdahl Muller Examiner Senior Lecturer, Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Susan Handy External Examiner Professor, Environmental Science and Policy University of California at Davis ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract Increasing bicycling in cities is a public health and sustainability goal. Although supportive infrastructure is a necessary precondition for most people to begin riding, other forms of encouragement are also needed to spur uptake across populations. Women are an important target group as they participate in bicycling at roughly one-third the rate of men. While much is known on the importance of a safe, dense, and well- connected bikeway network, there are knowledge gaps on ‘soft’ interventions related to training or education.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling: Supporting Economic Growth in Canada
    Cycling: Supporting Economic Growth in Canada Prepared by Vélo Canada Bikes for the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance pre-budget consultations Submitted August 3rd, 2018 1 Investing in cycling and active transportation: Supporting economic growth in Canada Recommendations for the Government of Canada In collaboration with provincial and territorial governments, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the Assembly of First Nations and additional stakeholders, implement the following recommendations: Recommendation #1: Develop a funding stream designed to rapidly increase the development and improvement of active transportation infrastructure and related traffic calming in all Canadian municipalities and in rural areas. Recommendation #2: Establish a national-level forum to consult, share, and develop a plan for moving more people and goods by bicycle in a wide variety of Canadian settings including urban, rural and remote communities. Recommendation #3: Direct Statistics Canada to collect data that will ensure the adequate and appropriate monitoring and reporting of the prevalence, potential and safety of cycling in Canadian municipalities. Use this data to set achievable evidence-based five- and ten-year transportation mode share targets for cycling. 2 Investment in bicycling represents a vastly underexploited opportunity for economic growth in Canada. If more Canadians were able to safely use a bicycle for daily transportation, there would be significant economic benefits including: a boost to economic productivity from a healthier and more productive workforce; improved mobility and personal savings for Canadians; disadvantaged groups could more easily gain skills and access employment opportunities and there would be an increase in business and tourism revenues. Increased cycling would also help to counter the negative economic costs that motorized vehicles impose on society in the form of congestion; road casualties; physical inactivity and poor health; pollution; and the political and environmental costs of maintaining fossil fuel supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling Canada
    CYCLING CANADA AMENDED XXXII OLYMPIC GAMES TEAM SELECTION POLICY THIS POLICY REPLACES THE VERSION PUBLISHED ON JULY 15, 2019 Principal amendments are in red Font JULY 23-AUG. 8, 2021, TOKYO, JAPAN DRAFT PUBLISHED APRIL 14, 2019 FINAL VERSION PUBLISHED JULY 15, 2019 AMENDED DRAFT PUBLISHED ON JUNE 19, 2020 UPDATED ON JAN. 12, 2021, AFTER PUBLICATION OF UCI CALENDARS REVIEWED BY THE CYCLING CANADA HIGH PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE, THE CYCLING CANADA ATHLETES COUNCIL AND THE CANADIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE Amended Cycling Canada Tokyo Olympic Selection Criteria TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE TO AMENDED CRITERIA ........................................................................................................ 3 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 2. DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY .............................................................................................. 5 3. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION (IF) CRITERIA ........................................................................... 5 4. ATHLETE ELIGIBILITY ................................................................................................................ 5 5. SELECTION CRITERIA ............................................................................................................... 6 6. OTHER FACTORS THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED IN SELECTION ................................................ 14 7. EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Schelstraete- Coulier
    ALBERT SCHELSTRAETE- COULIER INDUCTED 2017 The Canadian Cycling Hall of Fame is pleased to welcome Albert Schelstraete-Coulier as an inductee for 2017 in the Builder category for his lifetime of devotion to the development and promotion of cycling in Canada. At the national level Albert served as President of the Canadian Wheelman’s Association (the predecessor national governing body for cycling in Canada to the Canadian Cycling Association – now called Cycling Canada) from 1952 to 1957 then again from 1972 to 1974. At that same time he served as Canada’s representative to the Pan American Cycling Federation (COPACI) and led the Canadian cycling delegation at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich. He had an amateur and professional career which included being named the outstanding Canadian cyclist in 1940. His later racing days included several medal winning performances at masters racing events across North American and Europe including gold medal performances at World Masters Championships and World Seniors Games. At the local level Albert spent a lifetime organizing and running races both on the road and on the track. He founded the Norfolk Cycling Club in 1939 and it still exists today as the Silver Spokes Cycling Club With all of the above accomplishments you would wonder what else he found time to be involved in and that begins another part of the story. He was the only Canadian designer, builder and race promoter of velodromes from 1948 to 1975 and was the key contributor to six-day bike racing for that period and more. In the history of six-day bicycle racing in Canada there is one person who has transcended the decades from the Golden Era of the 1930's to the first decade of the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 Years LRT Timeline
    LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT IN EDMONTON 1981 2001 2004 2008 A 2.2 kilometre LRT extension to Customer service further improves The ETS Trip Planner becomes available. Innovative customer service starts up Clareview station opens. The City partners with Telus and installs public The City of Edmonton starts 311, a service that lets TTY payphones in all LRT stations. 2005 residents access information on city programs and 1983 More inclusive and customer focused services, including transit information. All riders’ needs considered 2001 The Mobility Card for persons with disabilities is The Bay and Corona LRT stations LRT gets a fresh, new look improved. A subsidized monthly transit pass for 2009 Edmonton AISH recipients becomes a regular, open up. For the first time, The new updated Clareview LRT Station opens. The Bay LRT station is re-named Bay/Enterprise accessibility features are added, ongoing program. Square and the Health Sciences LRT station is re- 1951 1961 such as elevators. 2003 named Health Sciences/Jubilee. New LRT stations The vision for a more Superintendent D.L. (Don) MacDonald submits the first 2006 open at South Campus and McKernan/Belgravia. efficient, environmentally- report to city council on the benefits of LRT. 1989 LRT is 25 years old LRT continues to grow Council accepts LRT Network Plan. friendly public transit, Edmonton’s LRT system celebrates 25 years of Grandin Station opens at the The Health Sciences LRT Station opens making the 2010 including Light Rail Transit 1960s Government Centre, near Alberta’s service. Monthly pass for seniors introduced. track 12.9 kilometres long. (LRT), begins.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Research – Mountain Biking Market Profiles
    Secondary Research – Mountain Biking Market Profiles Final Report Reproduction in whole or in part is not permitted without the express permission of Parks Canada PAR001-1020 Prepared for: Parks Canada March 2010 www.cra.ca 1-888-414-1336 Table of Contents Page Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 Sommaire .............................................................................................................................. 2 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 Origin .............................................................................................................................. 4 Mountain Biking Disciplines ............................................................................................. 4 Types of Mountain Bicycles .............................................................................................. 7 Emerging Trends .............................................................................................................. 7 Associations .......................................................................................................................... 8 International ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Line Fact Sheet – Operations
    METRO LINE FACT SHEET – OPERATIONS For the first time in Edmonton, two different LRT lines are operating on the same set of tracks. The Capital Line continues to operate between Century Park Station and Clareview Station, while the Metro Line is designed to operate between Health Sciences Station and the new NAIT Station. LRT passengers will be able to change between the Capital Line and the Metro Line anywhere between Health Sciences Station and NAIT Station. SIGNALLING SYSTEM Light rail systems operate according to a few basic principles, including ensuring enough space between trains for the system to operate safely. Edmonton’s original LRT system, the Capital Line, has used a fixed-block signalling system, which divides the track into defined blocks and ensures there is always at least one empty block between trains. A new signalling system is being installed to manage train movements on both the Metro and Capital Lines. The communication-based train control signaling system that the Metro Line uses is a type of moving-block system, which maintains a block of space around each train rather than a block of space between each train. This allows ETS to safely tighten up the spacing between trains so they can run more frequently. It has taken the contractor much longer than anticipated to deliver the new signalling system, which has delayed the opening of the Metro Line. STAGED IMPLEMENTATION The City has developed an interim solution in order to open the Metro Line to public service as soon as possible: Fixed Block vs. Moving Block Signalling In the short term, Metro Line trains will run every 15 minutes between Century Park and NAIT.
    [Show full text]
  • LRT Lessons That Can Be Learned from Edmonton and Calgary
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1361 39 LRT Lessons That Can Be Learned from Edmonton and Calgary J. J. BAKKER Although Edmonton established the first light rail transit (LRT) the southwest via the University of Alberta, and one to the system on the North American continent, it did not sustain mo­ northwest. The downtown distribution was in the form of a mentum. Edmonton learned from cities such as Cleveland, Frank­ loop with one-way operation, in tunnel under Jasper Avenue furt am Main, and Philadelphia. In turn Calgary learned from with a single track and above ground along the Canadian Edmonton. Now, 14 yeiirs since the first line in Edmonton opened, it is useful to sum up the lessons. First, continue at a steady rate National (CN) right-of-way. In the early 1970s it was finally of development so that there is continuity in the planning and realized that Edmonton could not afford to build freeways design experience. This also allows local contractors to develop towards the central business district (CBD). The planning expertise. Second, keep the stations simple. With a proof-of­ evolved from heavy rail to light rail and, some would say, payment fare system, stations can be simple. Avoid changes in back again. levels for passengers, and make the stations user friendly. Third, surface lines should be introduced early. Once tunneling has started, a constituency develops that wants to build a metro system rather than the light construction really needed. Fourth, ridership should Influence of Other Cities be developed by first introducing express buses, which can later be transformed into feeder bus lines to the LRT.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Rail Opportunities Scoping Report Preface
    01 Canada Rail Opportunities Canada Rail Opportunities Scoping Report Preface Acknowledgements Photo and image credits The authors would like to thank the Agence Métropolitaine de Transport following organisations for their help and British Columbia Ministry of Transportation support in the creation of this publication: and Infrastructure Agence Métropolitaine de Transport BC Transit Alberta Ministry of Transport Calgary Transit Alberta High Speed Rail City of Brampton ARUP City of Hamilton Balfour Beatty City of Mississauga Bombardier City of Ottawa Calgary Transit Edmonton Transit Canadian National Railway Helen Hemmingsen, UKTI Toronto Canadian Urban Transit Association Metrolinx Edmonton Transit OC Transpo GO Transit Sasha Musij, UKTI Calgary Metrolinx Société de Transport de Montréal RailTerm TransLink SNC Lavalin Toronto Transit Commission Toronto Transit Commission Wikimedia Commons Wikipedia Front cover image: SkyTrain in Richmond, Vancouver Canada Rail Opportunities Contents Preface Foreword 09 About UK Trade & Investment 10 High Value Opportunities Programme 11 Executive Summary 12 1.0 Introduction 14 2.0 Background on Canada 15 2.1 Macro Economic Review 16 2.2 Public-Private Partnerships 18 3.0 Overview of the Canadian Rail Sector 20 4.0 Review of Urban Transit Operations and Opportunities by Province 21 4.1 Summary Table of Existing Urban Transit Rail Infrastructure and Operations 22 4.2 Summary Table of Key Project Opportunities 24 4.3 Ontario 26 4.4 Québec 33 4.5 Alberta 37 4.6 British Columbia 41 5.0 In-Market suppliers 45 5.1 Contractors 45 5.2 Systems and Rolling Stock 48 5.3 Consultants 49 6.0 Concluding Remarks 51 7.0 Annexes 52 7.1 Doing Business in Canada 52 7.2 Abbreviations 53 7.3 Bibliography 54 7.4 List of Reference Websites 56 7.5 How can UKTI Help UK Organisations Succeed in Canada 58 Contact UKTI 59 04 Canada Rail Opportunities About the Authors David Bill Helen Hemmingsen David is the International Helen Hemmingsen is a Trade Officer Development Director for the UK with the British Consulate General Railway Industry Association (RIA).
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Research – Mountain Biking Market Profiles
    Secondary Research – Mountain Biking Market Profiles Final Report Reproduction in whole or in part is not permitted without the express permission of Parks Canada PAR001-1020 Prepared for: Parks Canada March 2010 www.cra.ca 1-888-414-1336 Table of Contents Page Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 Sommaire .............................................................................................................................. 2 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 Origin .............................................................................................................................. 4 Mountain Biking Disciplines ............................................................................................. 4 Types of Mountain Bicycles .............................................................................................. 7 Emerging Trends .............................................................................................................. 7 Associations .......................................................................................................................... 8 International ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]