DOCSLIB.ORG

Measuring Mobility in a Changing Island

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Measuring Mobility in a Changing Island Measuring Mobility in a Changing Island A report commissioned by the EURES Cross Border Partnership Centre for Cross Border Studies May 2010 Joe Shiels Annmarie O’Kane Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those organisations who engaged with us in profiling their cross‐border employees and, in particular, Justin Gleeson, AIRO (All‐Island Research Observatory) Project Manager, National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis (NIRSA), National University of Ireland, Maynooth who provided maps and statistics for population within 30kms of the border. Table of Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 The Context of Cross Border Mobility 6 2.1 European Union 6 2.2 North/ South Ministerial Council 8 2.3 EURES Cross Border Partnership 8 2.4 Border People 9 3 The North West region 10 4 Cross‐border statistics in the North‐West 11 5 Survey of Organisations in the North‐West 16 5.1 Survey sample 16 5.2 The Results 17 5.2.1 Numbers of cross‐border employees, North and South 17 5.2.2 Scale of organisations with cross‐border employees, North and South 19 5.2.3 Organisation sector and cross‐border employees, North and South 20 5.2.4 Extrapolate to entire border region 22 6 Maps 23 7 Supplementary Statistics 30 7.1 North South Traffic Flows 30 7.2 Cross‐border births 32 7.3 Cross‐border Education 32 7.4 Cross‐border shopping 33 7.5 Currrency 33 8 Conclusions 35 Table of Figures Figure 1: Border People page view / hit statistics 2010 10 Figure 2: Numbers of cross‐border employees identified in North and South survey sample 19 Figure 3: Percentages of cross‐border employees by size of organisation 20 Figure 4: Numbers of cross‐border employees by size of organisation 20 Figure 5: Numbers of cross‐border employees by size of organisation 20 Figure 6: Percentage of cross‐border employees by organisation sector 21 Figure 7: Numbers of cross‐border employees by organisation sector 21 Figure 8: Location of 64 surveyed organisations within the catchment area 24 Figure 9: The scale and direction of cross‐border employees within the North West 25 Figure 10: The location of large‐sized organisations (>250 employees) surveyed 26 Figure 11: The location of medium‐ sized organisations (51 to 250 employees) surveyed 27 Figure 12: The location of small‐sized organisations (10 to 50 employees) surveyed 28 Figure 13: The location of micro‐sized organisations (<10 employees) surveyed 29 Figure 14: Annual Average Daily Traffic (5 day week) flows at Border Traffic Census collection points, 2007 (total flows in/out) 31 Figure 15: Average number of daily passengers and cars on cross‐border ferry (1 Jan ‐ 21 Mar 2010) 31 Figure 16: Births in Northern Ireland by residents of the Republic of Ireland, by NI Health Board 32 Figure 17: Number of students travelling across the border for education, 2000 ‐ 2007 33 Figure 18: Euro/ Sterling exchange rates sourced from the European Central Bank 34 Table of Tables Table 1: Residents of Republic of Ireland commuting to work in Northern Ireland, CSO 2006 13 Table 2: Residents of County Donegal commuting to work in Northern Ireland, CSO 2006 14 Table 3: Northern Irish Residents Working in Republic of Ireland, NISRA 2001 16 Measuring Mobility in a Changing Island EURES Cross Border Partnership 1 Introduction In January 2010 the Centre for Cross Border Studies was commissioned by the EURES Cross‐border Partnership to provide statistics on the number of people within the North West region who commute across the Northern Ireland/ Republic of Ireland border to work. Cross border commuting is typically borne of natural local responses to local opportunities. The behaviour of large employers and local traditions all shape the social context for the labour market in the North West where two different systems of labour regulation are in close proximity and employees can potentially fall ‘between two stools’. This happens when national institutions, effective at the level of one jurisdiction, do not mesh together with those of the other jurisdiction making it problematic to handle cross‐border employees who might have different expectations, traditions, and backgrounds. There are no centralised or categorised statistics recorded on the extent of cross‐border mobility at all‐island or regional level. Analysis of cross‐border labour is limited by shortages and mismatches of official data. While the Irish Censuses North and South are excellent sources for looking at labour flows within states, they have serious shortcomings in the information available on cross‐border flows. Not only are the censuses held at different times, the most recent census in the Republic of Ireland was held in 2006, in Northern Ireland it was in 2001, but important questions are phrased in different ways. As the recent Atlas of the Island of Ireland states “of the 1161 Small Area Population Statistics (SAPS) outputted from the 2001 census in Ireland, our analysis estimates that 32% of the variables can be matched directly to the Northern Ireland census… this means that over two thirds of all census variables published in the South have no direct equivalents in Northern Ireland without manipulation” 1. The 2011 censuses in both jurisdictions present a great opportunity to build on the development of comparative North‐South statistics. In 2001, a report commissioned by the North South Ministerial Council2 identified the lack of accurate and up‐to‐date data about the extent of cross‐border mobility as a major obstacle to 1 Gleeson, et al. 2008. Atlas of the Island of Ireland: Mapping Social and Economic Change. All‐Island Research Observatory (AIRO), NUI Maynooth. 2 PwC / Indecon Economic Consultants. 2001. Study of Obstacles to cross‐border mobility. North South Ministreial Council, Armagh. 5 Measuring Mobility in a Changing Island EURES Cross Border Partnership dealing with issues in taxation, social security, pensions, health services, childcare, housing, transport, education and training, employment law, recruitment practices, telecoms, banking and insurance for people who move across the NI‐Irish border. This NSMC report stated that approximately 18,000 workers (9,000 in each direction), 5,200 students and 4,000 migrants cross the border to work or study each year, with another 1.7 million crossing to shop or for other purposes by bus or train. It was suggested at the time that cross‐border commuting may be more significant than the data suggested. Other previous figures on mobility include the 14 million cars crossing the border at Killeen between Newry and Dundalk every year (the main cross‐border road axis) and the approximately 16,000 patients (between 1996 and 2003) who have formally crossed the border to receive health care in the other jurisdiction. These 2001 baseline figures, and subsequent supplementary figures, have been used to justify the development of cross‐border mobility initiatives over the past decade. It is beyond the scope of this study to estimate precisely the magnitude of the Northern Ireland/ Republic of Ireland cross‐border flows given its fluidity, complexity, and evolution. Instead this study has adopted a pragmatic and empirical approach to documenting mobility in the busiest cross border commuting channel in Ireland, the North‐West border region of Donegal and Derry. During February‐April 2010 the Centre for Cross Border Studies contacted a random sample of employers situated within 30km of border within the North West region to examine the number of their employees who lived on the opposite side of the border. This study sought to categorise the cross‐ border commuting patterns of 30% of all employees within the North West region, identifying where cross‐border commuting occurs and in what volume. Furthermore this study sought to elucidate the nature of cross‐border employers by identifying those sectors and scale of organisations that employ people from across the border. While the main findings of this report are centred on a survey of employers within this zone but are supplemented by the provision of other cross‐border statistics provided by Government Departments and Agencies on cross‐border flows. This is the first study of its kind to link patterns of cross‐border commuting to specific organisations. 2 The Context of Cross Border Mobility 2.1 European Union Any consideration of factors impacting on mobility between the two jurisdictions in Ireland needs to be set within the wider EU context, and specifically the right to freedom of movement which is an essential part of EU citizenship. It is also important to reflect on the fact that many of the obstacles 6 Measuring Mobility in a Changing Island EURES Cross Border Partnership to mobility evident across European borders are similar to those experienced between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. The 1997 Amsterdam Treaty provided new impetus to improve labour mobility within the EU, and at the Spring European Council (Stockholm 2001) a strategy to promote the development of a more integrated European labour market was discussed. The first stage in this strategy is the implementation and completion of the first set of key policy actions to enhance mobility and maximise the potential of the internal market. The second stage was based on the establishment of a Skills Mobility Task Force, which met for the first time in June 2001. In its efforts to enhance the EU competitiveness and foster job creation, the European Council has identified mobility as a key element for achieving the goals of the revised Lisbon Strategy3 and for the implementation of the European Employment Strategy4. The designation of 2006 as the European Year of Worker’s Mobility has provided a broader vision of mobility issues, and enhanced the knowledge base about mobility flows and practices, as well as the identification of current obstacles to geographic and job‐to‐job mobility in the EU.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APPENDIX F1 – Overview of Zones of Archaeological Potential for Recorded Sites/Monuments Within the Lifford Flood Relief Scheme Constraints Study Area
    APPENDIX F1 – Overview of Zones of Archaeological Potential for recorded sites/monuments within the Lifford Flood Relief Scheme Constraints Study Area APPENDIX F2 – Overview of Lifford Town Historic Core with relevant Zones of Archaeological Potential indicated APPENDIX F3 – Details of Archaeological Sites & Monuments within the Study Area (Refer to Appendix F1 above) Map Ref; RMP Class & Description Townland ITM E/ N (Figure 2) 1. DG071-008---- Historic town LIFFORD, 633345 898491 Described in the Urban Survey of Donegal as 'Like most of Donegal's plantation towns Lifford owes TOWNPARKS its existence to its strategic location, at the meeting of the rivers Murne and Finn, and at the (Clonleigh South ED) beginning of the River Foyle. There was no bridge and throughout the seventeenth century the river crossing was negotiated by ferry. The town is also located in an area of particularly good agricultural land and was described as early as 1623 as "seated in the richest soil of all the north, the country about it champaign" (Butlin 1976, 149). Its strategic significance was evident before the plantation period, however, and it was here that the O'Donnells built a castle in the fifteenth century (this castle is located in Co. Tyrone). The earl of Essex arrived here in 1574 as part of his ill-fated Ulster expedition and formally restored it to Hugh O'Donnell (Hayes McCoy 1976, 97). Ten years later, in 1584, Perrott proposed it for the site of an English garrison if Ulster was to be subdued. Perrott's proposals went unheeded, however, and it was not until 1600 when it was captured by Dowcra's forces, under the command of Niall garbh O'Donnell that it fell into English hands.
    [Show full text]
  • 52Nd MEETING of the FOYLE CARLINGFORD
    74th MEETING OF THE FOYLE CARLINGFORD AND IRISH LIGHTS COMMISSION Wednesday 2nd May 2012 @ 11am Silverbirch Hotel, Omagh Attendees Present Winston Patterson (Chairman) Alan McCulla (Vice Chair) Andrew Duncan Donal Tipping Jim Wilson Joe Miller Michael McCormick Phil Mahon Seamus Rodgers Tarlach O’Crosain Theresa McLaverty In Attendance - Loughs Agency John Pollock – Director of Corporate Services John McCartney – Director of Conservation and Protection Barry Fox – Director of Aquaculture and Shellfisheries Laura McCready (Minutes) 1. Apologies Thomas Sloan Derick Anderson – CEO 2. Conflict of Interest There were no conflicts of interest with any agenda items. 3. Minutes of the Previous Meeting The minutes of the previous meeting were agreed as an accurate record. Proposed Alan McCulla Seconded Tarlach O’Crosain 4. Reserved Minutes The reserved minutes were agreed by all. Proposed Alan McCulla Seconded Tarlach O’Crosain 5. Matters Arising There were no matters arising from the previous meeting. 6. CEO Report Chairman advised the Board that the CEO was unavailable to attend the meeting and asked John Pollock to update the Board on any issues that may have been brought up by the CEO. John Pollock advised that since the last Board Meeting two members of staff had been seriously assaulted whilst on routine patrol. The first Fishery Officer Kris Kennedy received a broken nose on Lifford Bridge on 28th March 2012 and on 30th April 2012 Fishery Officer Donal Lynch was also assaulted receiving serious facial injuries, both members of staff remain on sick leave. All Board Members expressed their great concerns in relation to the ongoing attacks on staff and asked that their best wishes be passed to Fishery Officers Kennedy and Lynch for a speedy recover.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Azhar University- Gaza Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science Department of Political Science
    Al-Azhar University- Gaza Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science Department of Political Science MA. Program of Political Science Peace and Settlement in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and Northern Ireland: A Comparative Study اﻟﺴﻼم واﻻﺴﺘ�طﺎن ﻓﻲ ﻗطﺎع ﻏزة واﻟﻀﻔﺔ اﻟﻐر��ﺔ، ٕواﯿرﻟﻨدا اﻟﺸﻤﺎﻟ�ﺔ دراﺴﺔ ﻤﻘﺎرﻨﺔ by: Reem Motlaq Wishah-Othman Supervised by Dr. Mkhaimar Abusada Associate Professor of Political Science Al-Azhar University- Gaza Gaza- Palestine 1436 Hijra- 2015 Affirmation It is hereby affirmed that this M.A. research in Politics entitled: Peace and Settlement in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and Northern Ireland: A Comparative Study is my own original contribution which has not been submitted-wholly or partially-for any degree to any other educational or research institution. I hereby declare that appropriate credit has been paid where reference has been made to the works of others. Moreover, I fully shoulder the responsibility-legal and academic-for any real contradiction to this “Affirmation” may emerge. Researcher’s Name: Reem Motlaq Ibrahim Wishah-Othman Researcher’s Signature: Date: 5 November 2015 إﻗــــــــــــ را ر �ﻤوﺠب ﻫذا، أﻗر أﻨﺎ اﻟﻤوﻗﻌﺔ أدﻨﺎﻩ، ﻤﻘدﻤﺔ ﻫذﻩ اﻷطروﺤﺔ ﻟﻨﯿﻞ درﺠﺔ اﻟﻤﺎﺠﺴﺘﯿر ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌﻠوم اﻟﺴ�ﺎﺴ�ﺔ �ﻌﻨوان: Peace and Settlement in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and Northern Ireland A Comparative Study اﻟﺴﻼم واﻻﺴﺘ�طﺎن ﻓﻲ ﻗطﺎع ﻏزة واﻟﻀﻔﺔ اﻟﻐر��ﺔ، ٕواﯿرﻟﻨدا اﻟﺸﻤﺎﻟ�ﺔ: دراﺴﺔ ﻤﻘﺎرﻨﺔ. �ﺄن ﻤﺎ اﺸﺘﻤﻠت ﻋﻠ�ﻪ ﻫذﻩ اﻷطروﺤﺔ، إﻨﻤﺎ ﻫو ﻨﺘﺎج ﺠﻬدي ٕواﺴﻬﺎﻤﻲ، �ﺎﺴﺘﺜﻨﺎء ﻤﺎ أﺸرت إﻟ�ﻪ ﺤﯿﺜﻤﺎ ورد، وأن ﻫذﻩ اﻷطروﺤﺔ، أو أي ﺠزء ﻤﻨﻬﺎ، ﻟم �ﻘدم ﻤن ﻗﺒﻞ ﻟﻨﯿﻞ أي درﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻤ�ﺔ أو أي ﻟﻘب ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻟدى أي ﻤؤﺴﺴﺔ ﺘﻌﻠ�ﻤ�ﺔ أو �ﺤﺜ�ﺔ أﺨرى.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland) Health System Review
    Health Systems in Transition Vol. 14 No. 10 2012 United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) Health system review Ciaran O’Neill Pat McGregor Sherry Merkur Sherry Merkur (Editor) and Sarah Thomson were responsible for this HiT Editorial Board Editor in chief Elias Mossialos, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Josep Figueras, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Martin McKee, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom Richard Saltman, Emory University, United States Editorial team Jonathan Cylus, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Cristina Hernández-Quevedo, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Marina Karanikolos, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Anna Maresso, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies David McDaid, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sherry Merkur, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Philipa Mladovsky, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Dimitra Panteli, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Wilm Quentin, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Bernd Rechel, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Erica Richardson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Anna Sagan, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sarah Thomson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Ewout van Ginneken, Berlin University of Technology, Germany International advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage
    Roughan & O’Donovan N14 / N15 to A5 Link Consulting Engineers Environmental Impact Statement – Volume 1 Chapter 10 Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage Ref: 10.152 July 2011 Roughan & O’Donovan N14 / N15 to A5 Link Consulting Engineers Environmental Impact Statement – Volume 1 Chapter 10 Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage 10.1 Introduction This chapter was prepared by Archaeological Development Services Ltd having been commissioned by Roughan & O’Donovan on behalf of their client, Donegal County Council. The Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage chapter relates to the proposed N14/N15 to A5 Link Scheme which involves the design of a road linking the A5 Western Transport Corridor (WTC) in Tyrone to the existing N15 at Lifford in County Donegal (refer Figure 3.1, Volume 2). 10.2 Methodology 10.2.1 Guidelines and Policy This Chapter is compiled so as to be compliant with the guidelines set out in legislation in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Northern Ireland The relevant legislation in Northern Ireland which protects and recognizes the archaeological heritage is The Historic Monuments and Archaeological Objects (Northern Ireland) Order 1995. The Planning Service has produced a series of Planning Policy Statements which set out the policies of the Department of the Environment on particular aspects of land- use planning. Each Planning Policy Statement applies to the whole of Northern Ireland and their contents are taken into account when development plans are being prepared. The contents are also material in the case of decisions on individual planning applications and appeals. Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning, Archaeology and The Built Heritage (PPS 6) specifically sets out the planning policies of the Department of the Environment in relation to the protection and conservation of archaeological remains and other features of the built heritage and advises on the treatment of these issues in development plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Cooperation in Northwest Region
    Centre for International Borders Research Papers produced as part of the project Mapping frontiers, plotting pathways: routes to North-South cooperation in a divided island IRISH CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION: THE CASE OF THE NORTHWEST REGION Alessia Cividin Project supported by the EU Programme for Peace and Reconciliation and administered by the Higher Education Authority, 2004-06 WORKING PAPER 14 IRISH CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION: THE CASE OF THE NORTHWEST REGION Alessia Cividin MFPP Working Papers No. 14, 2006 (also printed as IBIS working paper no. 64) © the author, 2006 Mapping Frontiers, Plotting Pathways Working Paper No. 14, 2006 (also printed as IBIS working paper no. 64) Institute for British-Irish Studies Institute of Governance ISSN 1649-0304 Geary Institute for the Social Sciences Centre for International Borders Research University College Dublin Queen’s University Belfast ABSTRACT BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION IRISH CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION: Alessia Cividin is a PhD candidate at the Planning Department, IUAV, University of THE CASE OF THE NORTHWEST REGION Venice. She holds a Bachelor of Architecture degree from the University of Venice, and was a visiting research associate at Queen’s University of Belfast in 2005 work- Traditionally grasped as a division, the border between the Republic of Ireland and ing on cross-border cooperation. Her research addresses the issues of cross-border Northern Ireland is increasingly understood as forming an individual unit made up of cooperation, regional governance and territorial planning, and links these to reason- multiple connections. This paper analyses this border as assumed, and tries to de- ing under intercultural communication. velop its meaning within a European setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Population Accessibility and Regional Growth: an Irish Border Region Case-Study
    9 200 Cross-Border Population September Accessibility and Regional Growth: – An Irish Border Region Case-Study 52 Declan Curran No Justin Gleeson NIRSA Working Paper Series Cross-Border Population Accessibility and Regional Growth: An Irish Border Region Case-Study Declan Curran1 Justin Gleeson National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis National University of Ireland Maynooth Maynooth Co. Kildare IRELAND [email protected] [email protected] September 2009 Abstract This paper calculates and maps relative population accessibility indices at a national and regional level for the island of Ireland over the period 1991-2002 and assesses whether the changing nature of the border between the Republic and Northern Ireland as it becomes more porous has impacted on the growth of the Irish border region over that time period. A spatial econometric analysis is the undertaken to assess the economic consequences of increased economic integration between Northern Ireland and the Republic. Neoclassical β-convergence regression analysis is employed, with the population accessibility indices used to capture the changing nature of the Irish border. 1 The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), the International Centre for Cross Border Studies (ICLRD), and the All-Island Research Observatory (AIRO). The authors also wish to thank Morton O’Kelly for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper and Peter Foley for his excellent research assistance. 1 1. Introduction It is well known that many existing national borders have been shaped by the conflicts and post-war negotiations experienced throughout the 20th century and earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Buncrana Report
    Strategic Strengths and Future Strategic Direction of Buncrana, County Donegal A Donegal County Council Commissioned Study August 2020 Cover Image: © Matthew Clifford of CE Óige Foróige Club, Buncrana ii The information and opinions expressed in this document have been compiled by the authors from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. However, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions contained in this document constitute the authors judgement as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. iii Acknowledgements The ICLRD would like to thank Donegal County Council for their assistance, advice and guidance throughout the course of this study. We also convey our sincerest thanks to the numerous interviewees and focus group attendees who were consulted during the course of this research; the views and opinions expressed contributed significantly to this work. The research team takes this opportunity to thank the ICLRD partners for their support during this study, and Justin Gleeson of the All-Island Research Observatory (AIRO) for his assistance in the mapping of various datasets. iv Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Purpose of this Report ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Irish Detective Novel
    The Contemporary Irish Detective Novel Edited by Elizabeth Mannion General Editor: Clive Bloom Crime Files Series Editor Clive Bloom Emeritus Professor of English and American Studies Middlesex University London Since its invention in the nineteenth century, detective fi ction has never been more popular. In novels, short stories, fi lms, radio, television and now in computer games, private detectives and psychopaths, poisoners and overworked cops, tommy gun gangsters and cocaine criminals are the very stuff of modern imagination, and their creators one mainstay of popular consciousness. Crime Files is a ground-breaking series offering scholars, students and discerning readers a comprehensive set of guides to the world of crime and detective fi ction. Every aspect of crime writing, detective fi ction, gangster movie, true-crime exposé, police procedural and post-colonial investigation is explored through clear and informative texts offering comprehensive coverage and theoretical sophistication. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/14927 Elizabeth Mannion Editor The Contemporary Irish Detective Novel Editor Elizabeth Mannion Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA Crime Files ISBN 978-1-137-53939-7 ISBN 978-1-137-53940-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53940-3 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016933996 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identifi ed as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or here- after developed.
    [Show full text]
  • LDP Draft Plan Strategy – SA Scoping Report
    Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report Local Development Plan 2032 Local Development Plan – Draft Plan Strategy (LDP PS) SA Scoping Report December 2019 Prepared for Derry City & Strabane District Council by Shared Environmental Services. Page i November 2019 Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report Local Development Plan 2032 Consultation Arrangements The LDP draft Plan Strategy (dPS) is a consultation document, to which representations can be made during a formal consultation period from Monday 2nd December 2019 to Monday 27th January 2020. Representations received after this date will not be considered. The dPS document is available, together with the associated documents, at http://www. derrystrabane.com/Subsites/LDP/Local-Development-Plan These documents are also available to view, during normal opening hours, at: . Council Offices, 98 Strand Road, Derry, BT48 7NN . Council Offices, 47 Derry Road, Strabane, BT82 8DY . Public Libraries and Council Leisure Centres throughout the District. Public Meetings and Workshops will be held throughout the District during December 2019 / January 2020; see the Council’s website and local press advertisements for details: http://www.derrystrabane. com/Subsites/LDP/Local-Development-Plan The LDP draft Plan Strategy is considered by the Council to be ‘sound’; if you have any comments or objections to make, it is necessary to demonstrate why you consider that the Plan is not ‘sound’ and / or why you consider your proposal to be ‘sound’. Comments, or representations made in writing, will be considered at an Independent Examination (IE) conducted by the Planning Appeals Commission (PAC) or other independent body that will be appointed by the Department for Infrastructure (DfI). The IE will determine whether the dPS satisfies statutory requirements and also consider the ‘soundness’ of the LDP dPS - against the Procedural Tests, Consistency Tests and the Coherence & Effectiveness Tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Insolvency (Amendment) Bill (NIA Bill 39/11-16)
    Committee for Enterprise, Trade and Investment Report on the Insolvency (Amendment) Bill (NIA Bill 39/11-16) Together with the Minutes of Proceedings of the Committee relating to the Report and the Minutes of Evidence Ordered by the Committee for Enterprise, Trade and Investment to be printed on 3 March 2015 Mandate 2011/16 Fifth Report - NIA 227/11-16 Membership and Powers Membership and Powers Powers The Committee for Enterprise, Trade & Investment is a Statutory Committee established in accordance with paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Belfast Agreement, Section 29 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and under Assembly Standing Order 46. The Committee has a scrutiny, policy development and consultation role with respect to the Department of Enterprise, Trade & Investment and has a role in the initiation of legislation. The Committee has power to: ■ Consider and advise on Departmental Budgets and Annual Plans in the context of the overall budget allocation; ■ Approve relevant secondary legislation and take the Committee stage of relevant primary legislation; ■ Call for persons and papers; ■ Initiate inquiries and make reports; and ■ Consider and advise on matters brought to the Committee by the Minister of Enterprise, Trade & Investment. Membership The Committee has 11 members, including a Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson, and a quorum of five members. The membership of the Committee is as follows: Democratic Unionist Party Paul Givan1 William Humphrey2 Gordon Dunne Paul Frew3 Green Party Steven Agnew Sinn Féin Phil Flanagan (Deputy Chairperson)4 Megan Fearon5 Máirtín Ó Muilleoir6 Social Democratic & Labour Party Patsy McGlone (Chairperson)7 Fearghal McKinney8 Ulster Unionist Party Danny Kinahan9 1 With effect from 16th September 2013 Mr Sydney Anderson replaced Mr Stephen Moutray.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit at the Border: Voices of Local Communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland/Northern Ireland
    Brexit at the Border: Voices of local communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland/Northern Ireland Hayward, K. (2018). Brexit at the Border: Voices of local communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland/Northern Ireland. Irish Central Border Area Network. Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2018 The Author. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:28. Sep. 2021 BREXIT AT THE BORDER: Voices of Local Communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland / Northern Ireland Executive Summary B 3 O 1 A 1 B 3 R 1 E 1 X 8 I 1 T 1 D 2 T 1 H 4 E 1 R 1 BREXIT AT THE BORDER Voices of Local Communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland / Northern Ireland A report prepared for the Irish Central Border Area Network By Katy Hayward Centre for International Borders Research Queen’s University Belfast Belfast June 2018 ISBN 978-1-909131-69-9 Boarding on Brexit Contents Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]