Richmondshire District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Richmondshire District Richmondshire District Personal Details: Name: Susan Alderson E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: My submission is objecting to Melbecks Parish being combined with Hawes and High Abbotside. I am a resident of Melbecks Parish Council and have lived in for the past 28 years. During that time I have seen a shift in the shopping patterns of residents. Apart from people at the top end of Swaledale who perhaps still visit Hawes regularly, others tend to travel down dale to Reeth, Leyburn, Catterick and Richmond or even have shopping delivered by one of the supermarkets. The road through Swaledale B6270 is classed as a priority route and so is treated daily in cold winter weather as is the road through Wensleydale, but the Buttertubs, can be difficult as there are no properties between Thwaite in Swaledale and Simonstone on the outskirts of Hawes in Wensleydale if help is needed. All services to residents in Swaledale are based on journeys up and down the dale. Refuse collection, Royal Mail deliveries and collections, schools and their transport, Churches and their work together and pubs with their social competitions. Children in this area go to Gunnerside, Reeth and then Richmond, even from the top end of the dale, so they become used to this direction of travel. The only service which takes some residents into Wensleydale is for the doctor but these numbers are not as high as they used to be as the surgery in Reeth is now considered to be in the top 5% in the country. Low Row village itself is split by the river with some houses on the south side, in Grinton parish, and the bulk on the north side in Melbecks. Why can’t these two now be joined together in the proposed Reeth and Arkengarthdale parish with whom we have more in common than Hawes and Huigh Abbotside? Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Richmondshire District Personal Details: Name: Andrew Bedford E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: The name Hawes and High Abbotside doesn't reflect the vast area of land which is in Swaledale. Hawes and Upper Swaledale or Upper Swaledale and Upper Wensleydale might be a more accurate description. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Owen, David From: Sue Bianco Sent: 02 January 2018 20:33 To: reviews Subject: Objection: Patrick Brompton This is an objection to the Boundary Commission Proposal to remove Patrick Brompton Parish in North Yorkshire from the Lower Wensleydale Ward and place the Parish in a new Ward of Scotton. Quite simply, this proposal is wrong on many counts, but the most obvious and deeply disturbing of these is the idea that Patrick Brompton should be separated from Newton le Willows. These two villages do not just share common interests, they live and act as one community. They are within a stone’s throw of each other, certainly less than half a mile by the well‐used public footpath, and no more than three quarters of a mile by road. The church (which is, and always has been, the church for both villages) has a wonderfully close congregation made up of people from both villages who don’t regard themselves as separate in any proper sense of the word. The two villages also have a joint Village hall committee, and the Parish Council also works as one. If you add to this the fact that Patrick Brompton is a very typical lower Wensleydale village, whereas Scotton is effectively an extension of the fast expanding Catterick Garrison then the proposal becomes even more incongruous. The interests and identities of Scotton and Patrick Brompton are vastly different, with the focus in Scotton centring around the Armed Forces and the garrison community. The issues and concerns of Patrick Brompton could not be more different, and the proposal would effectively leave the village in an isolated position. Scotton, which is not even in Wensleydale, is almost five miles from Patrick Brompton. The Commission’s proposal, therefore, contravenes its own terms of statutory criteria, as it would split the existing community of Patrick Brompton and Newton le Willows and force Patrick Brompton into a ward where it has not the slightest common interest or identity. I fully support, therefore, the Parish Council’s counter‐proposal – that Patrick Brompton be left in the Lower Wensleydale Ward where it belongs, and that Spennithorne Parish be moved to the Leyburn Ward. There is no conflict in the interests and identities of Spennithorne and Leyburn, and the numbers would balance out as, over the next 5‐10 years, the population of Scotton is bound to increase in line with the ongoing plans for the Garrison development. Best regards Susan Bianco 1 2 Richmondshire District Personal Details: Name: Jane Branch E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: None Comment text: I live in Tunstall Village and have read the proposal for the change to "Scotton Ward". I do not agree that this proposal links communities with shared interests. It appears that this proposal is based on proximity rather than shared interest. Scotton is part of the Catterick Garrison community whereas Tunstall and the other rural villages that have been moved into the new Scotton ward have their roots in farming. Tunstall has strong links with Catterick Village, sharing the same ecclesiastical parish with twinned churches. About 30% of the population of the new proposed ward has rural roots and makes up more than half of the land area. I believe this change risks the rural communities interests being marginalised, particularly if the 2 Councillors for the ward are drawn from the Garrison community. I have not been able to redraw an alternative proposal but at the very least I would think that to restore some balance to this proposal, the ward should be named "Scotton and Hornby Castle" to underline the prior name and draw attention to the rural population. I note it is proposed to name another new ward "Catterick and Brompton on Swale" so there is precedence for this proposal. I feel with all of the planned local development being centered on Colburn and surrounding area that our rural parishes are at serious risk of losing their voice with this proposal. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded The Review Officer (Richmondshire) Local Government Boundary Commission for England 141h Floor Millbank Tower Millbank London SW1P4QP Draft recommendations in respect of the review of Local Government Ward Boundaries across Richmondshire District. Dear Sir, I wish to formally register my objection to the draft recommendations of the Boundary Commission which would have the effect of removing the Parish of Patrick Brampton from its current Ward of Lower Wensleydale and place it in a new Scotton Ward. Such a move, from Lower Wensleydale into a Swaledale Ward, would shatter the deep seated and historical associations, which date back to 1086, when the Parish of Patrick Brampton was cited in the Domesday Book with reference to Wensleydale. I understand that the initial proposition was to keep Patrick Brampton Parish in the Lower Wensleydale Ward. Whilst I appreciate that the objective of the review is to establish Wards of equal size of around 1608 electors with a tolerance of plus or minus 10%, I think that placing Patrick Brampton Parish, a rural community closely linked with other villages and communities in Lower Wensleydale which have very similar if not the same issues, into the Scotton ward which is an overwhelmingly urban ward whose community interests would likely, in the main, be centred on the community within the Garrison and the Military is antithetical with the aims and values of the Commission. This does not chime well with the Local Government Boundary Commission's statutory canon: Community Identities - ... that the pattern of wards should, as far as possible, reflect the interests and identities of local communities. It can be seen that the current proposal separates the village of Patrick Brampton from other villages in which we share a common interest: There is a great deal of synergy between other villages in Lower Wensleydale and Patrick Brompton. Patrick Brompton shares a village hall with Newton Le Willows, with Trustees from both villages sitting on the committee, where events involving members of both communities are organised and attended. Newton Le Willows and Patrick Brompton Parish Councils have worked together on local issues and shared Clerks. Planning issues in respect of large projects on the boundaries of local parishes have seen Parish Councils and action groups within the communities working in partnership to oppose or promote them successfully. The Parish Church of St Patrick's is in the united benefice of Lower Wensleydale Parishes and is known as the Gateway to Lower Wensleydale, with five of the six churches being in Richmondshire. The churches worshipping community is gathered, in the main, from Patrick Brompton and Newton Le Willows. The local WI is the Newton Le Willows and Patrick Brompton WI. The Atkinson Clarke Educational Foundation covers both the Parish areas of Patrick Brompton and Newton Le Willows, again with Trustees from both villages on the board. I am aware that the Patrick Brompton Parish Council is actively involved in the Lower Wensleydale Partnership meetings where representatives of Parish Councils in the group get together to discuss issues raised in the locality, find solutions to local problems and search for funding for selected projects. I have been present when at Parish Council meetings this matter has been discussed and I am aware that, the view of the residents of the Parish are, that the Parish should remain in the Lower Wensleydale Ward. The Parish Council replied in the first instance pointing out the links between this community and those of Lower Wensleydale.
Recommended publications
  • Agenda to Notify the Clerk of Matters for Inclusion on the Agenda for the Next Meeting
    HAWES & HIGH ABBOTSIDE PARISH COUNCIL CLERK: Mrs Karen Prudden Coatie, Bainbridge, Leyburn, North Yorkshire, DL8 3EF Telephone: 01969 650706 E-mail: [email protected] Dear Councillor You are summoned to attend a Meeting of Hawes & High Abbotside Parish Council, starting at 6.30 pm, to be held on THURSDAY 26th AUGUST 2021 via ‘Zoom’. Members of the public wishing to attend this meeting should contact the Clerk in advance to ensure they receive a link to the meeting ================================================================================== MEETING OF HAWES & HIGH ABBOTSIDE PARISH COUNCIL A G E N D A 1. Notification of the Council’s expectations in respect of recording of the meeting 2. Apologies for Absence To receive apologies and approve the reasons for absence. 3. Declarations of Interest To receive any declarations of interest not already declared under the Council’s Code of Conduct or members Register of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests. 4. Minutes of the Last Meeting To confirm the Minutes of the Meeting held on 29th June 2021 as a true and correct record and to sign them as such. 5. Ongoing Matters To receive information on the following ongoing issues and decide further action where necessary:- 5.1. To receive an update on the Appersett and Burtersett village signs 5.2. To receive an update on the clearance of overgrown hedges overhanging footpaths 6. Planning Applications To Consider Planning Applications:- 6.1 R/56/520 - Householder Planning Permission for erection of glazed canopy extension and associated alterations
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Wemmergill Estate 25 Year Management Plan
    1 Wemmergill Moor Limited Management Agreement 2017-2042 Stephanie Bird-Halton, Team Leader – Natural England Richard Johnson, Estates Manager – Wemmergill Moor Limited Dave Mitchell, Lead Adviser – Natural England John Pinkney, Head Keeper – Wemmergill Moor Limited Version 2.2, May 2017 2 Contents Page Number Introduction 3 1) The Vision 6 2) Sensitive Features and Sustainable 8 Infrastructure Principles 3) Sustainable Infrastructure 18 Specifications Agreed Infrastructure Map 33 Agreed Infrastructure List 34 4) Vegetation Management Principles 35 5) Bare Peat & Grip Blocking 45 Specifications 6) Monitoring 47 7) Terms & Conditions of the 62 Agreement and signatories References 67 3 Deed of Agreement under Sections 7 and 13 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 THIS DEED OF AGREEMENT is made on the day of 2017 PARTIES (1) Natural England of 4th Floor, Foss House, Kings Pool, 1-2 Peasholme Green, York YO1 7PX ('Natural England'); and (2) Wemmergill Moor Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number 4749924 whose registered office is at O’Reilly Chartered Accountants, Kiln Hill, Market Place, Hawes, North Yorkshire, DL8 3RA (“the Land Owner”). Introduction Wemmergill is one of Britain's most historic and prolific grouse moors, with shooting records that date back to 1843. In the late 19th Century members of the Royal Families of Europe, and MPs were regular visitors during the shooting season, staying at Wemmergill Hall (demolished in the 1980's). Sir Fredrick Milbank MP leased the shooting in the late 1860's when the landowner John Bowes, founder of the Bowes Museum, was living in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Edition
    THE UPPER WENSLEYDALE NEWSLETTER Issue 229 October 2016 Donation please: 30p suggested or more if you wish Covering Upper Wensleydale from Wensley to Garsdale Head, with Walden and Bishopdale, Swaledale from Keld to Gunnerside plus Cowgill in Upper Dentdale. Published by Upper Wensleydale The Upper Wensleydale Newsletter Newsletter Burnside Coach House, Burtersett Road, Hawes DL8 3NT Tel: 667785 Issue 229 October 2016 Email for submission of articles, what’s ons, letters etc.:[email protected] Features Competition 4 Newsletters on the Web, simply enter ____________________________ “Upper Wensleydale Newsletter” or Swaledale Mountain Rescue 12 ‘‘Welcome to Wensleydale’ Archive copies back to 1995 are in the Dales ________________ ____________ Countryside Museum resources room. Wensleydale Wheels 7 ____________________________ Committee: Alan S.Watkinson, A684 9 and 10 Malcolm Carruthers, ____________________________ Barry Cruickshanks (Web), Police Report 18 Sue E .Duffield, Karen Jones, ____________________________ Alastair Macintosh, Neil Piper, Karen Prudden Doctor’s Rotas 17 Janet W. Thomson (Treasurer), ____________________________ Peter Wood Message from Spain 16 Final processing: ___________________________ Sarah Champion, Adrian Janke. Jane Ritchie 21 Postal distribution: Derek Stephens ____________________________ What’s On 13 ________________________ PLEASE NOTE Plus all the regulars This web-copy does not contain the commercial adverts which are in the full Newsletter. Whilst we try to ensure that all information is As a general rule we only accept adverts from correct we cannot be held legally responsible within the circulation area and no more than for omissions or inaccuracies in articles, one-third of each issue is taken up with them. adverts or listings, or for any inconvenience caused. Views expressed in articles are the - Advertising sole responsibility of the person by lined.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Yorkshire Dales Access Forum to Be Held on Tuesday 18 June 2013 1.15Pm at Yoredale, Bainbridge
    Meeting of the Yorkshire Dales Access Forum To be held on Tuesday 18 June 2013 1.15pm at Yoredale, Bainbridge Meeting to Commence at 1.15pm 1. Welcome 2. Apologies 3. Approval of minutes, and matters arising (not on the agenda) 4. Public Question time – three minutes per speaker (those wishing to speak should make themselves known to the Secretary at the start of the meeting or in advance of the meeting) 5. Future Forum Meetings - Agenda Items - Dates 6. Chairman’s feedback 7. Feedback from the Recreation Management Member Champion 8. Report back from Advisory Groups: • Access on Foot • Bridleways and Restricted Byways • Green Lanes 9. Woodland creation 10. Fencing on common land 11. Rights of Way Annual Report (will be circulated before the meeting once members comments have been incorporated into the report) 12. Good Practice in Traffic Management on Unsealed Routes, John Richardson 13. Presentation on Ease of Use 14. Secretary’s Report (Items for note and consideration by Forum Members) 15. Update on members’ activities (brief reports of activities relating to the Forum) Annual General Meeting of the Yorkshire Dales Local Access Forum Held on Tuesday 26 February 2013 Yoredale, Bainbridge Present: Jon Beavan (JB), Andrew Colley (AC), David Gibson (DG), Neil Heseltine (NH), Kevin Lancaster (KL), Alex Law (AL), Jocelyn Manners-Armstrong (JMA), Ken Miller (KM), Stuart Monk (SM), Jerry Pearlman (JP), John Richardson (JR), Jonathan Smith (JS), Sara Spillett (SS), Heather Thomas-Smith (HTS), Alistair Thompson (AT), Nick Thwaite (NT), Pat Whelan (PWh), Phillip Woodyer (PW). YDNPA Officers present: Alan Hulme (AH), Rachel Briggs (RB) – LAF Secretary, Julie Barker (JMB), Mark Allum (MA), Ann Williams (AW), Cathy Bradley (CB).
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook for IPUMS Great Britain 1851-1881 Linked Dataset
    Codebook for IPUMS Great Britain 1851-1881 linked dataset 1 Contents SAMPLE: Sample identifier 12 SERIAL: Household index number 12 SEQ: Index to distinguish between copies of households with multiple primary links 12 PERNUM: Person index within household 13 LINKTYPE: Link type 13 LINKWT: Number of cases in linkable population represented by linked case 13 NAMELAST: Last name 13 NAMEFRST: First name 13 AGE: Age 14 AGEMONTH: Age in months 14 BPLCNTRY: Country of birth 14 BPLCTYGB: County of birth, Britain 20 CFU: CFU index number 22 CFUSIZE: Number of people in individuals CFU 23 CNTRY: Country of residence 23 CNTRYGB: Country within Great Britain 24 COUNTYGB: County, Britain 24 ELDCH: Age of eldest own child in household 27 FAMSIZE: Number of own family members in household 27 FAMUNIT: Family unit membership 28 FARM: Farm, NAPP definition 29 GQ: Group quarters 30 HEADLOC: Location of head in household 31 2 HHWT: Household weight 31 INACTVGB: Adjunct occupational code (Inactive), Britain 31 LABFORCE: Labor force participation 51 MARRYDAU: Number of married female off-spring in household 51 MARRYSON: Number of married male off-spring in household 51 MARST: Marital status 52 MIGRANT: Migration status 52 MOMLOC: Mothers location in household 52 NATIVITY: Nativity 53 NCHILD: Number of own children in household 53 NCHLT10: Number of own children under age 10 in household 53 NCHLT5: Number of own children under age 5 in household 54 NCOUPLES: Number of married couples in household 54 NFAMS: Number of families in household 54 NFATHERS: Number of fathers
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Farm Buildings Survey
    National Character Area 21 Yorkshire Dales Summary The Yorkshire Dales is a large scale upland landscape of high moorland, dissected by often deep dales, which forms part of the Pennine uplands running up the centre of Northern England. It is separated from the North Pennines by the Stainmore Trough faults and from the more industrialised South Pennines by the Craven Faults. Just 0.3% of the area is urban, 4% is woodland, and 26% is upland grazing. 71% of the area falls within the Yorkshire Dales National Park and 17% within the Nidderdale AONB. 30% of the area is designated as SSSI. The key farmstead characteristics are: Landscape and Settlement $! !"#$%&'(!)*!+&,-(.%(/!.+/!/#01('0(/!0(%%-(2(+%3!(0%.4-#05(/!#+!%5(!2(/#(6.-!1('#)/!.+/!-.%('3!0(%!#+!.!-.+/0,.1(! with a long history of enclosure. $! !7#85!/(+0#%9!)*!*.'20%(./0!.+/!*#(-/!4.'+0!#+!%5(!-.+/0,.1(:!;5(!5#85(0%!/(+0#%#(0!.'(!,)22)+-9!.00),#.%(/!<#%5! small-scale fields in the pastoral upper dales, and the miner-farmer landscapes of the northern dales. Larger farms are found in the lower dales where arable farming was more commonly practised. $! !;5(!*.'2(/!-.+/0,.1(0!)*!%5(!=)'>05#'(!?.-(0!5.6(!02.--!.'(.0!)*!#''(8&-.'!*#(-/0!'(0&-%#+8!*')2!%5(!,-(.'.+,(!)*! woodland by the 14th century. Isolated farmsteads otherwise developed from medieval cattle farms and forest lodges or as a result of the piecemeal and planned enclosure of farm and common land. Farmstead and Building Types $! !@#+(.'!*.'20%(./0!A!<#%5!5)&0(0!.+/!<)'>#+8!4&#-/#+80!.%%.,5(/!#+A-#+(3!0)2(%#2(0!($%(+/(/!#+%)!.+!)6('.--!@! shape - are the dominant type of farmstead, and may also have additional detached buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan
    local environment agency plan SWALE, URE AND OUSE CONSULTATION REPORT JUNE 1997 MIDDLESBROUG THIRSK YORK LEEDS HULL .WAKEFIELD YOUR VIEW S The Swale, Ure and Ouse Local Environment Agency Plan Consultation Report is the Agency's view of the state of the environment in this area and the issues that we believe need to be addressed. We should like to hear your views: • Have all the m ajor issues been highlighted? • Have the objectives and proposals been correctly identified? • Do you have any comments to make regarding the plan in general? During the consultation period for this report the Agency w ould be pleased to receive any comments in writing to: The Environment Planner Swale, Ure and Ouse LEAP The Environment Agency North East Region Coverdale House Amy Johnson Way York Y03 4UZ All comments must be received by 30 September 1997. All comments received on the Consultation Report will be considered in preparing the next phase, the Action Plan. This Action Plan will focus on updating section 4 of this Consultation Report by turning the proposals into actions but the remainder of this Report will not necessarily be rewritten. Note: Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information in this report it m ay contain some errors or omissions which we shall be pleased to note. Structure of this Consultation Report This Consultation Report is divided into two parts, Part I and Part II. A brief description of each can be found below. PART I Consists of an introduction to the Agency, an overview of the Swale, Ure and Ouse area, key partnerships the Agency has with other bodies and proposals we feel will address the important environmental issues in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Yoredale Middleham Hawes, High Abbotside & Upper
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF RICHMONDSHIRE EPPLEBY CLIFFE CP Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of Richmondshire April 2018 CP Sheet 1 of 1 CALDWELL CP P C N Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background H may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information O J MANFIELD CP applied as part of this review. P T C S Y FORCETT K B C S I ALDBROUGH A N This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey CP E W O on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. CP L T N C P E Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. A C L The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2018. T MELSONBY T P P C S N S A E T O CP S T W Y A L EAST LAYTON EAST CARKIN CP NEWTON MORRELL CP NEWSHAM CP P CROFT & C H T MELSONBY CP MIDDLETON DALTON CP R BARTON CP O TYAS W CROFT-ON-TEES S N CP ERYHOLME E V CP A R DALTON-ON-TEES CP GAYLES CP KIRBY MIDDLETON HILL CP TYAS CP GILLING WITH NEW GILLING WEST HARTFORTH AND ARKENGARTHDALE CP FOREST CP SEDBURY CP WHASHTON CP MOULTON NORTH CP COWTON CP ASKE CP SKEEBY CP UCKERBY RICHMOND CP F NORTH MARSKE CP T RICHMOND WEST S A E E D RICHMOND CP N MARRICK CP O D M H C I R SCORTON CP MUKER CP EASBY CP BROMPTON-ON- LOWER SWALEDALE SWALE CP REETH, ST MARTIN'S CP CATTERICK FREMINGTON AND & ARKENGARTHDALE & BROMPTON-ON-SWALE MELBECKS CP HEALAUGH CP CP HUDSWELL CP E AL W C -S N ON- O - COLBURN N- P LTO HIPSWELL
    [Show full text]
  • Full Edition
    THE UPPER WENSLEYDALE NEWSLETTER ISSUE 188 FEBRUARY 2013 Donation please: 30p suggested or more if you wish tarmac to reduce run-off, using less energy (see Published by Upper Wensleydale Editorial Rose Rambler on page 30) or even upping our The Upper Wensleydale Newsletter Newsletter ooking back and forth! Back, there was giving to the poorest in the world. It can also Burnside Coach House, the Jubilee and then the Olympics. cheer us up, ‘doing our bit’. Forth, anything to take the mind to Burtersett Road, Hawes DL8 3NT Issue 188— February 2013 L As for the other really big issues, at home or pleasant things? To date it isn’t looking good. abroad, shouldn’t we really try to read up the Features What will be the ‘main issues’ this year; what facts, so that when any opportunity comes to Tel: 667785 will really concern us? Already, triviality is rais- ‘have our say’ we know what we are talking ing its head; we write as even the Prime Minis- e-mail: [email protected] Editorial 3 about and don’t make up our minds on hearsay ter has had to answer questions about horse or prejudice? ____________________________ meat, and a local authority is talking about pun- After the usual thorough committee discussion Printed by Wensleydale Press Hawes Auction Mart 12 ishment for throwing snowballs. Do we make a on this we agreed it was a bit gloomy and ________________ ____________ fuss about the right things? Whatever next? Not heavy. Could readers suggest, we mused, any Committee: Alan S.Watkinson, Our Schools 14 that a bit of trivia and gossip is particularly Barry Cruickshanks (web), Sue E .Duffield, good, cheerful stuff for the future to cheer us ____________________________ harmful but… Sue Harpley, , Alastair Macintosh, up… and then we thought “ Oh yes, Bradford Ranger Report 17 Far from trivial, on the world stage, are new City!” Neil Piper, Janet W.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Areas
    List of Areas 1 Member of Parliament 79 Parish/Town Councils/Parish Meetings 1 Police, Fire & Crime Commissioner 25 Parish Meetings 6 County Councillors 54 Parish/Town Councils 24 District Councillors 335 Parish/Town Councillors 34 Parish/Town Council 170 5 Councillors 4 Parish/Town Council 24 6 Councillors 6 Parish/Town Council 42 7 Councillors 2 Parish/Town Council 16 8 Councillors 4 Parish/Town Council 36 9 Councillors 1 Parish/Town Council 10 10 Councillors 2 Parish/Town Council 22 11 Councillors 1 Parish/Town Council 15 15 Councillors 335 1 Parliamentary Constituency Richmond (Yorks) (1) (MP area) 1 Police, Fire & Crime Commissioner North Yorkshire (1) 6 Electoral Divisions Catterick Bridge (1) (County Councillor Areas) Central Richmondshire (1) Middle Dales (1) Richmond (1) Richmondshire North (1) Upper Dales (1) 16 District Wards Catterick & Brompton-on- Hipswell (2) Middleham (1) (District Councillor Areas) Swale(3) Leyburn (2) Richmond East (1) Colburn (2) Lower Swaledale & Arkengarthdale Richmond North (1) Croft & Middleton Tyas (2) (1) Richmond West (2) Gilling West (1) Lower Wensleydale (1) Scotton (2) Hawes, High Abbotside & Melsonby (1) Yoredale (1) Upper Swaledale (1) 79 Parish/Town Councils/Meetings 4 Town Councils 50 Parish Councils 25 Parish Meetings 2 Town Councils (single) 41Parish Councils (single) 24 Parish Meetings (single) 2 Town Council (3 Wards) 9 Grouped Parish Councils (29 1 Grouped Parish Meeting (3 Parishes) Parishes) 101 Parishes 1 Akebar 35 Easby 69 Muker 2 Aldbrough 36 East Hauxwell 70 New Forest 3 Appleton
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH YORKSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    A photograph exists for milestones listed below but would benefit from updating! NORTH YORKSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road Parish Location Position YN _CBGB13 NZ 0933 1273 Off A66 WYCLIFFE WITH THORPE 30m SE of Thorpe Grange Farm on verge, in ivy against wall YN _XXSKY SD 9974 4806 A629 SKIPTON Jct Ings La to Bradley On narrow pavement in base of drystone wall YN_ADCO07 SD 9998 4470 A6068 GLUSBURN Colne rd, Glusburn opp. No. 21 on pavement, on slight bend, nearly opp Lodge Street YN_ADCO08 SD 9850 4410 A6068 SUTTON Colne rd, east of Cowling 30m east of turning traffic sign, on narrow verge YN_ADCO10 SD 9585 4288 A6068 COWLING Colne rd, W of Cowling opp. eastern most chevron for bends YN_ADCO11 SD 9459 4190 A6068 LANESHAWBRIDGE ExYW Colne rd/Keighley rd E of track to Bowes Edge, nr County boundary, opp Pendle sign YN_AKSB01 SD 9310 9089 UC ASKRIGG east of rd from A684 at Bainbridge to Askrigg rd on verge nr wall, nr FP sign to Skellgill YN_AKSB02 SD 917 908 UC LOW ABBOTSIDE opp. Kettlewell La to Hill Top Farm, on banking above Rd YN_AKSB03 SD 899 906 UC HIGH ABBOTSIDE 40m west of Bird Gill; a mile east of Sedbusk nr stand of trees on north side YN_AKSB03M SD 899 906 UC HIGH ABBOTSIDE 40m west of Bird Gill; a mile east of Sedbusk 1m E of AKSB03 YN_AKSB04 SD 884 908 UC HIGH ABBOTSIDE Sedbusk nr lane to north into hamlet YN_AKSB04M SD 884 908 UC HIGH ABBOTSIDE Sedbusk opp.
    [Show full text]