DOCSLIB.ORG

TERMINAL EVALUATION of the PROJECT Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Conservation Into Production Sectors in the Sindhudurg Coast, Maharashtra, India

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TERMINAL EVALUATION of the PROJECT Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Conservation Into Production Sectors in the Sindhudurg Coast, Maharashtra, India TERMINAL EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Conservation into Production Sectors in the Sindhudurg Coast, Maharashtra, India UNDP Project ID: 00072738 GEF Project ID: PIMS 4242 Date of Submission of TE Report: Draft Submitted 12/15/17; Final on ___ GEF Focal Area: Biodiversity GEF Implementing Agency: UNDP Project Implementing Agency: Government of Maharashtra Evaluation Team: Ms. Virginia Ravndal, International Consultant & Team Leader Dr. Ravishankar Thupalli, National Consultant Terminal Evaluation of UNDP GEF Sindhudurg Project, India 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The evaluators thank all those who patiently took part in interviews and generously took time out of their busy days to share their perspectives and information crucial to the conduct of this evaluation. We are especially appreciative of all the members of the Project Management Unit (PMU), Mr. N. Vasudevan, Head, Mangrove Cell and Project Nodal Officer, Dr. Subir Ghosh, Project Coordinator, the excellent Project field staff at Malvan, the very capable UNVs, the excellent logistical support provided by the PMU, Ms. Lianchawii Chhakchhuak, Programme Analyst, UNDP/India, Government officials of the Forest Department and Fisheries Department, the District Collector and CEO of Sindhudurg District, the project’s technical partners, and local stakeholders for their valuable contributions to the TET. Terminal Evaluation of UNDP GEF Sindhudurg Project, India 2 ACRONYMS AWP Annual Work Plan BMC Biodiversity Management Committee CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CEO Chief Executive Officer CIBA Central Institute for Brackish Water Aquaculture CIFT Central Institute for Fisheries Technology CMFRI Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute EC Executive Committee GEF Global Environment Facility GOI Government of India GOM Government of Maharashtra IGCMP India GEF Coastal Marine Programme IISDA Institute of Scuba Diving and Aquatic Sports KCRT Konkan Cetacean Research Team LLPMU Landscape Level Project Management Unit LP Landscape level zoning plan MoEF&CC Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change MMFRA Maharashtra Marine Fisheries Regulation Act MPEDA Marine Products Export Development Authority MSFD Maharashtra State Forest Department MMS Malvan Marine Sanctuary MTR Mid Term Review NCSCM National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management NGO Non-Government Organization NIO National Institute of Oceanography NPD National Project Director NPMU National Project Management Unit NPSC National Project Steering Committee PIF Project Identification Form Terminal Evaluation of UNDP GEF Sindhudurg Project, India 3 PIR Project Implementation Review PMU used to refer collectively to the project’s management units at national, state and landscape level PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal QWP Quarterly Work Plan Rampini A traditional form of sea fishing practiced in western India RGCA Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Aquaculture SACON Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History SCME Sindhudurg coastal and marine ecosystem SHG Self Help Group SMART Specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound – criteria for identifying appropriate indicators SPD State Project Director SPMU State Project Management Unit SPSC State Project Steering Committee SRI System of Rice Intensification Taluka A subdivision of a District consisting of a group of several villages organized for revenue purposes TE Terminal Evaluation TET Terminal Evaluation Team ToR Terms of Reference UC Utilization Certificate UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNV United Nations Volunteer Terminal Evaluation of UNDP GEF Sindhudurg Project, India 4 CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................... 3 CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 1. Project Summary Table ............................................................................................. 8 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 15 1.1 Purpose of this Evaluation .................................................................................................. 15 1.2 Scope and Methodology of the Evaluation .......................................................................... 15 1.3 Structure of this Report....................................................................................................... 16 1.4 Code of Conduct adhered to by the TET ............................................................................... 16 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT .............................................................. 16 2.1 Ecological & Development Context ..................................................................................... 16 2.2 Project Start and Duration .................................................................................................. 18 2.3 Problems the Project Sought to Address .............................................................................. 18 2.4 Immediate and Development Objectives of the Project ....................................................... 19 2.5 Project Description and Strategy ......................................................................................... 19 2.6 The Main Stakeholders ....................................................................................................... 19 2.7 Expected Results ................................................................................................................. 21 3. FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 23 3.1.1 Analysis of Project Logical/Results Framework ................................................................. 23 3.1.2 Analysis of Assumptions and Risks ................................................................................... 24 3.1.3 Lessons from Relevant Initiatives Incorporated ................................................................ 24 3.1.4 Planned Stakeholder Participation .................................................................................. 25 3.1.5 Replication Approach ...................................................................................................... 25 3.1.6 UNDP Comparative Advantage ........................................................................................ 25 3.1.7 Linkages with Other Interventions in the Sector (in the country) ....................................... 25 3.1.8 Project Management Arrangements ................................................................................ 27 3.2 Project Implementation ..................................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Adaptive Management .................................................................................................... 30 3.2.2 Partnership Arrangements ............................................................................................... 31 3.2.3 Project Finance ................................................................................................................ 31 Terminal Evaluation of UNDP GEF Sindhudurg Project, India 5 3.2.6 UNDP and Implementing Partners Implementation/Execution*, Coordination and Operational Issues .................................................................................................................... 37 3.3 Project Results .................................................................................................................... 38 3.3.1 Overall Results* (attainment of project objectives) (MS) .................................................. 38 3.3.2 Relevance* (R) ................................................................................................................. 38 3.3.3 Effectiveness & Efficiency * (MS) ..................................................................................... 39 3.3.4 Country Ownership .......................................................................................................... 40 3.3.5 Mainstreaming Gender .................................................................................................... 40 3.3.7 Impact ............................................................................................................................. 41 3.3.7 Sustainability* (L) ............................................................................................................ 41 4. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS & LESSONS ..................................................................... 43 4.1 Conclusions & Lessons ........................................................................................................ 43 4.2 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 46 ANNEXES ..................................................................................................................................... 48 Annex I: Ratings ........................................................................................................................... 48 Annex II: Terms of Reference for Terminal Evaluation .................................................................. 49 ANNEX A: PROJECT LOGICALFRAMEWORK ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fdukjh Vkf.K Leqnzhtsofofoèkrk Vkf.K Lacafèkr Lel;Kaps
    Curriculum on Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Protected Area Management fdukjh vkf.k leqnzh tSofofoèkrk vkf.k lajf{kr {ks= O;oLFkkiu ;kojhy vH;klØe Module 6 Assessment and Monitoring of Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Associated Issues For Field-Level MPA Managers eksMîqy 6% fdukjh vkf.k leqnzhtSofofoèkrk vkf.k lacafèkr leL;kaps ewY;ekiu vkf.k lafu;a=.k {ks=h;&ikrGhojhy MPA O;oLFkkidkalkBh Imprint vksG[kfpUg Training Resource Material on Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Protected Area Management for field-level MPA egkjk"Vªkrhy {ks=&Lrjh; MPA O;oLFkkidkalkBh fdukjh vkf.k leqæhtSofofo/krk vkf.k lajf{kr {ks= O;oLFkkiu çf’k{k.k managers of Maharashtra lalk/ku lkfgR; Module 1: An Introduction to Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services eksMîqy 1% fdukjh vkf.k leqnzhtSofofoèkrk vkf.k ifjfLFkrhd O;oLFkk lsospk ifjp; Module 2: Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystems Services in the Overall Environment and Development Context eksMîqy 2% ,dw.k i;kZoj.k vkf.k fodklkP;k lanHkkZr fdukjh vkf.k leqnzhtSofofoèkrk vkf.k ifjfLFkrhd O;oLFkk lsok Module 3: Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Conservation Concerns into Overall Development and Environmental Planning eksMîqy 3% ,dw.k fodkl vkf.k i;kZoj.kh; fu;kstukeè;s fdukjh vkf.k leqnzhtSofofoèkrk laoèkZukckcrps fo”k; eq[; çokgkr vk.k.ks Module 4: Coastal and Marine Protected Areas and Sustainable Fisheries Management eksMîqy 4% fdukjh vkf.k leqæh lajf{kr {ks=s vkf.k ‘kkÜor eRL;ks|ksx O;oLFkkiu Module 5: Governance, Law and Policies for Managing Coastal and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • Reef-Associated Ichthyofauna from a Marginal Coral Reef Habitat Along the West Coast of India: Implication for Management Strategies
    Cah. Biol. Mar. (2021) 62 : 87-97 DOI: 10.21411/CBM.A.DF8FA0B8 Reef-associated ichthyofauna from a marginal coral reef habitat along the west coast of India: Implication for management strategies Kalyan DE1,2, Sushant V. SANAYE3, Sambhaji MOTE1, Mandar NANAJKAR1 and Baban INGOLE1 (1) CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Goa - 403004, India (2) School of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Goa University, Taleigao, Goa - 403206, India (3) 3Mangrove and Marine Biodiversity Conservation Foundation of Maharashtra, 302, 3rd Floor, Wakefield House, Above Britannia & Co. Restaurant, Ballard Estate, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001, India Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: Coral reefs harbour remarkable high biodiversity. Reef fishes are among the most important communities in the coral reef ecosystem, significantly contributing to ecosystem functioning and reef resilience. However, under the continuous effect of climate change and human activities, corals and reef fishes are in peril. For the first time, we documented coral reef-associated ichthyofauna from Malvan marine sanctuary (MMS) on the central west coast of India, an understudied marginal patch coral reef habitat. Experiencing severe stress due to concurrent coral bleaching, fishing, sedimentation, intensifying tourism, and coastal development activities. We reported the occurrence of 47 species of reef fishes belonging to 35 genera and 26 families from the MMS, also a list of hard corals from in the MMS, thus highlighting the biodiversity of reef building corals and reef fishes in the MMS. The coral habitat in the MMS is experiencing severe stress due to concurrent thermal coral bleaching, fishing, sedimentation, intensifying tourism, and coastal development activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Document, and for the Use of Project Funds Through Effective Management and Well Established Project Review and Oversight Mechanisms
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... 3 1. SITUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 5 PART 1A: CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographic and biodiversity context ..................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Demographic and socio-economic context ............................................................................................ 8 1.3 Legislative, policy, and institutional context ....................................................................................... 11 PART 1B: BASELINE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 17 1.4 Threats to coastal and marine biodiversity of the SCME .................................................................... 17 1.5 Baseline efforts to conserve coastal and marine biodiversity of the SCME ......................................... 21 1.6 Desired long-term solution and barriers to achieving it...................................................................... 22 1.7 Stakeholder analysis ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Marine Protected Areas in India: Envis Bulletin Challenges and Way Forward 50 51 Wildlife and Protected Areas
    Coastal And Marine Protected Areas In India: envis bulletin Challenges And Way Forward 50 51 Wildlife and Protected Areas Summary India has an extensive coastline of 7517 km length, of which 5423 km is in peninsular India and 2094 km is in the 02 2 Andaman & Nicobar and Lakshadweep islands. The EEZ has an extent of 2.02 million km . This coastline also supports a huge human population, which is dependent on the rich coastal and marine resources. Despite the tremendous ecological and economic importance and the existence of a policy and regulatory framework, India's coastal and marine ecosystems are under threat. Numerous direct and indirect pressures arising from different types of economic development and associated activities are having adverse impacts on the coastal and marine biodiversity across the country. The marine protected area network in India has been used as a tool to manage natural marine resources for biodiversity conservation and for the well-being of people dependent on it. Scientific monitoring and traditional observations confirm that depleted natural marine resources are getting restored and/or pristine ecological conditions have been sustained in well managed MPAs. There are 24 MPAs in peninsular India and more than 100 MPAs in the country's islands. The 24 MPAs of the mainland have a total area of about 8214 km2, which is about 5% of the total protected area network of India and represents 0.25% of the total geographic area of the country. Dedicated efforts are required to secure and strengthen community participation in managing the marine protected area network in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Climate Resilience of India's Coastal Communities
    Annex II – Feasibility Study GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL I Enhancing climate resilience of India’s coastal communities Feasibility Study February 2017 ENHANCING CLIMATE RESILIENCE OF INDIA’S COASTAL COMMUNITIES Table of contents Acronym and abbreviations list ................................................................................................................................ 1 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 13 2. Climate risk profile of India ....................................................................................................................... 14 2.1. Country background ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.2. Incomes and poverty ............................................................................................................................ 15 2.3. Climate of India .................................................................................................................................... 16 2.4. Water resources, forests, agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Research Impact Factor : 5.7631(Uif) Ugc Approved Journal No
    Review Of ReseaRch impact factOR : 5.7631(Uif) UGc appROved JOURnal nO. 48514 issn: 2249-894X vOlUme - 8 | issUe - 3 | decembeR - 2018 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ALTERNATIVE TOURISM DESTINATIONS ALONG SINDHUDURG COAST, SINDHUDURG DISTRICT, MAHARASHTRA Dr. B. P. Kamble Assistant Professor , Elphinston College, Mumbai, India. ABSTRACT It is the known fact that in the contemporary world, competition is increasing in many fields of economic sectors including primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary. However, while keeping a pace with the fast growing world and standing on the path of competition, it is necessary that the nations need to adopt the principles of sustainable approach in every walk of their activities. One of the alternatives here to sustain the economy in an ecological way it to continue with Eco-tourism activities by exploring the destinations and forms of tourism that will attract large number of tourist to particular destination. The present paper the focuses on one of such alternative in Coastal district of Maharashtra, i.e. Sindhudurg. The research study discusses primary on activity of fishing and marine tourism as an alternative to stop environmental degradation and simultaneously improve the economic lifestyle of the region. KEYWORDS: Sustainable, marine tourism, fishing, coastal management. 1. INTRODUCTION: Sindhudurg district is located on the western side of Indian Peninsula. The state of Maharashtra is among the top five states in India in terms of overall species diversity. The state has a coast line of 720 km which is 9% of the total Indian coast line that extend from Dahanu and Bordi in the north to Goa in the south and falling in five coastal administrative district of Thane, Mumbai, Raigad, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg (from north to south).
    [Show full text]
  • A Report Onecological Status of the Proposed
    INTRODUCTION The attempt to conserve coastal and marine biodiversity (establishment of the MMS), which aimed primarily at the conservation of marine and coastal resources, is also found to be inadequate in view of the management challenges of the region. Despite its existence over two decades, it is yet to evolve a congenial environment for the effective management of the Marine Protected Area in the absence of baseline information on the faunal resources of the area. In order to improve the conservation prospects of the unique flora and fauna along the coast especially that of the Marine Sanctuary, long term solutions need to be anchored in several key areas: establishing a robust database on the biodiversity profile of the region as a foundation for informed decision making. Malvan is one of the biologically richest coastal regions in Maharashtra on the west coast of India. Due to its high ecological importance, an area of 29.12 km2 of Malvan coastal waters was designated as the Malvan Marine Sanctuary (MMS) in 1987, under the National Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, with subsequent notifications in the following years. With a core zone of 3.182 km² and buffer zone of 25.94 km² (total area being 29.122 km²) includes the Sindhudurg fort, Padamged island and other submerged rocky structures. The north eastern border of the buffer zone is 50 m from the seashore near Malvan port, while on the east it is a semi-circular sandy beach 500 m parallel to the shore of Malvan, in the south it is near Mandel rock, and in the west touches the Malvan rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Newsletter of the Ocean Society of India Volum E 7 | Issue 2 | April 2020 | ISSN 2394-1928 Ocean Digest Quarterly Newsletter of the Ocean Society of India
    OCEAN DIGEST Quarterly Newsletter of the Ocean Society of India Volum e 7 | Issue 2 | April 2020 | ISSN 2394-1928 Ocean Digest Quarterly Newsletter of the Ocean Society of India Multiple stressors impacting the corals on climate change events El Nino Southern Oscillations the Malvan Marine Sanctuary, Central (ENSO) events have occurred in tropical oceans, which West coast of India also raised sea surface temperature (SST) in the Indian Seas (Eakin et al. 2019). Moreover, compound effect of frequent thermal stress events driven coral bleaching and growing human pressure could overwhelm the ability of coral reefs to recover after the bleaching events (Van Hooidonk et al. 2016). Furthermore, recent studies have projected that coral reefs will decline by 70-90% relative to their current abundance by 2050 under the 'business-as- usual scenario' (Beyer et al., 2018; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018). Kalyan De, Sambhaji Mote, Baban Ingole Coral reefs in Indian water harbour a total of 585 CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, India Scleractinian species belonging to 108 genera and 23 [email protected] families (De et al. 2020), however, Indian reefs are also subjected to mass coral bleaching, pollution, disease Coral reefs are formed by hard corals or outbreak and coastal development activities (De et al. Scleractinians, a tiny multicellular invertebrate animal 2017). There are three main types of reefs found in India- that belongs to the phylum Cnidaria. They are some of the 2 Fringing reef (Andaman & Nicobar Islands 1021.46 km , oldest animals on the planet; they have been surviving on 2 2 Gulf of Kutch 352.50 km , Gulf of Mannar, 75.93 km ); the Earth by building limestone (CaCO ) reef structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Selected Herbivorous Coral Reef Fishes and Their Role in Coral Management, India
    International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI) |Volume III, Issue VIII, August 2016|ISSN 2321–2705 Biodiversity of Selected Herbivorous Coral Reef Fishes and Their Role in Coral Management, India V. S Gowri, I. Raja Rajasri Pramiladevi, P. Nammalwar AU-KBC, MIT Campus, Anna University, Chennai – 600044, India Abstract: Marine herbivorous fishes (Acanthuridae - The most important families of herbivorous reef fishes Surgeonfishes and Scaridae - Parrotfishes) play a significant role are 1) Acanthuridae (Surgeon fishes); 2) Scaridae (Parrot in the prevention of coral smothering and aiding in their fishes); 3) Pomacentridae (Damsel fishes) and 4) Siganidae resilience. Unaccountable herbivorous reef fishery and (Rabbit fishes). The distribution of herbivores is constrained bioinvasion of exotic seaweed in corals pose a danger in the by their algal food supplies. Different functional groups of healthy status of corals. An attempt is made not only on the biodiversity of these fishes in coral reefs in India (Gulf of herbivorous reef fishes like Scarpers, Excavators, Detritivores, Kachchh; Lakshadweep islands; Ratnagiri, Malvan, Goa, Gulf of Bioeroders and Browsers have been shown by [3] which may Mannar and Andaman and Nicobar islands); their fishery but be reef dwelling or associated with reef and support also recommends to have long-term monitoring studies in considerable fishery. The largest bodied taxa such as herbivorous reef fishery in the management of corals in India. Bolbometopon, Chlorurus and some Scarusspecies, are highly Key words: Surgeonfishes; Parrotfishes; Biodiversity, Bio- prized in many artisanal fisheries. The biggest reductions Invasion, Herbivorous Reef Fishery, Coral Management occurred in the large-bodied browser group, followed by the grazer/detritivores and scraper/excavators.
    [Show full text]
  • ©2017 Divya Karnad All Rights Reserved
    ©2017 DIVYA KARNAD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LOCATING EFFECTIVE COMMONS AND COMMUNITY IN MAHARASHTRA STATE'S FISHERIES, INDIA By DIVYA KARNAD A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Geography Written under the direction of Kevin St. Martin And Bonnie McCay And approved by _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION LOCATING EFFECTIVE COMMONS AND COMMUNITY IN MAHARASHTRA STATE'S FISHERIES, INDIA By DIVYA KARNAD Dissertation Directors: Kevin St. Martin Bonnie McCay This thesis views commons and resource management through a lens of plurality. Through discussions of plural identities, diverse economies and multiple legal systems, this work seeks to challenge the bounds of commons thinking, pushing past static understandings of people, social networks, the environment and resources. Principles created by Elinor Ostrom and colleagues have largely defined the commons management discourse, but my work follows that of St Martin, McCay and Jentoft in realizing the limits to a systems approach to commons research. The commons institution that I study does not fit Ostrom's criteria, and therefore could be assumed to be a failure, except that I have found evidence of key outcomes of successful commons institutions. These include management based on goals of social equity and ecological sustainability, as well as clear examples of the existence of community. Understanding this so-called 'anomalous' institution as successful requires a re- examination of commons theory. Thus my work uses post structural thinking, ii influenced by Jean-Luc Nancy and JK Gibson-Graham, to develop a more grounded theory approach to understanding commons management.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biodiversity
    ISSN 2319-4361 (Indexed in Google Scholar) Volume 6 | Issue 1 January - March 2017 Special Issue Part 2 Marine Biodiversity Mangroves Fishes, Crabs Otters, Dolphins, Whales Conservation Policy SMOOTH-COATED OTTER Status Survey of Otter Species in Mangrove Habitat of Sindhudurga District, Maharashtra Satish Pande, Anant Gokhale, Ram Mone, Rajkumar Pawar, Rahul Lonkar, Prashant Deshpande, Dr. Satish Karmalkar and Sudhanwa Rajurkar (Ela Foundation, Pune; [Email: [email protected]]. Citation: Pande Satish, Anant Gokhale, Ram Mone, Introduction Rajkumar Pawar, Rahul Lonkar, Prashant Deshpande, Otters [Mustelidae Family] are poorly studied aquatic Dr. Satish Karmalkar and Sudhanwa Rajurkar. (2017). mammals. No comprehensive data for the populations Status Survey Of Otter Species In Mangrove Habitat Of and current status of this taxon is available for the Sindhudurga District, Maharashtra. Sindhudurga district, Maharashtra, India. The sporadic Ela Journal of Forestry and Wildlife 6(1): 329-346 sightings are rare, mostly in and around mangroves and the habitats are not easily accessible. In this scenario, the Date of Publication: present study provides scientifi c data for the conservation 31-3-2017 of this species. There are possibly six species of otter occurring in Asia out of which the Eurasian Otter (Lutra ISSN 2319-4361 lutra), Smooth-coated Otter (Lutrogale perspicillata), Copyright: © Pande Satish, Anant Gokhale, Ram Mone and Asian Small-clawed Otter (Aonyx cinerea), are 1,2,3 et. al. 2017 reported from India . Otter surveys are problematic due to diffi culty in Referee: R. Yosef direct detection of individuals in natural habitats and associated high costs of surveying rough and many times diffi cult to reach terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Strategies for Maharashtra CMPA Technical Report Series No
    1 Implementation Strategies for Maharashtra CMPA Technical Report Series No. 55 Implementation Strategies for Maharashtra Authors Deepak Apte, Atul Sathe, Nishigandha Pednekar Published by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Indo-German Biodiversity Programme (IGBP), GIZ-India, A-2/18, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi - 110029, India E-Mail: [email protected] Web: www.giz.de October 2014 Responsible Dr. Konrad Uebelhör, Director, GIZ Photo Credit: Supriya Jhunjhunwala Design and Layout Commons Collective, Bangalore [email protected] Disclaimer The views expressed in this document are solely those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC), Government of India, or of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) or the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. The designation of geographical entities and presentation of material in this document do not imply the expression or opinion whatsoever on the part of MoEFCC, BMUB or GIZ concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Reference herein to any specific organisation, consulting firm, service provider or process followed does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favouring by MoEFCC, BMUB or GIZ. Implementation Strategies for Maharashtra Deepak Apte, Atul Sathe, Nishigandha Pednekar October 2014 CMPA Technical Report Series 55 Indo-German Biodiversity Programme Conservation and Sustainable Management of Coastal and Marine Protected Areas Implementation Strategies for Maharashtra P a g e s P LIST OF ACRONYMS v Chapters EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii 1.
    [Show full text]