Question: 1 (1) Councillor Frank Mcaveety Tabled Question to Ask

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Question: 1 (1) Councillor Frank Mcaveety Tabled Question to Ask Question: 1 (1) Councillor Frank McAveety To ask the Leader of the Council to comment on the Glasgow Life Golf Tabled Question Courses consultation. Cllr David McDonald. Responder The City Government remains committed, where we can, to remove the barriers of cost, accessibility and location that can prevent people taking part in sporting activities at all levels. We recognise the importance of golf provision in the city and the role it has had in enabling people to experience the outdoors and the wider health benefits this can bring. However, we are faced with declining participation levels across the city, a challenging financial climate and substantial maintenance costs which raises questions regarding the long term sustainability of this service. The declining participation in the city reflects the trend in Scotland overall, with figures showing we have lost more golfers in recent years than any other European country. Perhaps more significantly there has been a national decline in municipal club membership of 12% in the last year compared with 1.6% for private clubs. For these reasons Glasgow Life has set up a Golf Working Group, chaired by Bailie Norman MacLeod, who you will know is also a member of the Glasgow Life Board. The working group will review the current service and consider potential future options. The group also includes officers from across Glasgow City Council and representatives from partner organisations, including; SportScotland, Golf Scotland and Glasgow Golf Union. The recent golf survey aims to gauge public views on the current golf service, which to date Glasgow Life has received over 1500 completed submissions, which will help inform the review. It should however be emphasised that no decision has been made on future golf provision in Glasgow. Question: 2 (2) Councillor Jane Morgan To ask the Leader of the Council to update on the latest discussions with the UK Tabled Question Government following SERCO’s announcement to evict 300 refugees from their homes? Cllr Susan Aitken, Leader of the Council and City Convener for Inclusive Economic Responder Growth I wish I was able to update the chamber on discussions with the UK Government regarding these threatened evictions of asylum seekers. Unfortunately, despite repeated invitations to the Immigration Minister to visit Glasgow to meet those involved in delivering the dispersal programme, she has been unable, so far, to find time in her diary to take up that invitation. In her most recent response Caroline Nokes MP did indicate that she has asked her office to consider arrangements for a visit, and I will certainly keep the Council informed of progress on that. On the subject of the threatened evictions, I have again written to the Home Office making clear our opposition to the use of lock changes to evict people into destitution on the streets of Glasgow. I would echo the Joint Statement from organisations supporting people affected by eviction threats, who said, “Destitution is a political choice on the part of the Home Office and has no place in a humane and well-functioning asylum and immigration system.” As council is aware, asylum policy is a reserved policy and our ability to respond is limited by law. Members will be aware that Serco is threatening these evictions now because they are leaving the city this autumn to be replaced by another contractor, Mears Group, who are taking up a potential ten-year contract to provide asylum accommodation and support across Scotland. With the support of Cllr Layden, the Chief Executive and other officers, have joined colleagues from across the UK in pressing the Home Office to match this change of contractor by implementing the wider actions needed to improve the dispersal system, including funding for local authorities and other service providers in reception areas. Yesterday, my SNP colleagues in Westminster secured a debate on immigration and raised again the urgent reform of asylum policy including better quality decision, proper financial support, better managed move on period, right to work, funded systems for accommodation to avoid this situation that Glasgow currently finds itself in. Cllr Layden will be attending a meeting with the Immigration Minister in London on behalf of COSLA on 8th July and will once again make the case for change in Home Office policy. Question: 3 (3) Councillor Martin Rhodes To ask the City Convener for Community Empowerment, Equalities and Human Tabled Question Rights for an update on the evaluation process for the Participatory Budgeting pilots. Cllr Jennifer Layden, City Convener for Community Empowerment, Equalities and Responder Human Rights Thank you for your question. In February 2019 Glasgow City Council commissioned the GCPH to undertake an evaluation of the four PB pilot wards in Calton, Canal, Pollokshields and Greater Pollock. The remit of the evaluation is to produce a concise report that captures the learning across the pilot areas. GCPH represents good value in undertaking this work given their recognised expertise in PB, their knowledge of the four pilot wards and their offer of matching the £6k evaluation budget from their core budget; therefore, doubling the evaluation resource. Their evaluation framework can be found on their website. The evaluation began in May 2019 and will conclude in September. It will include interviews with the PB pilot lead within Glasgow City Council, the pilot leads in each ward and focus groups with community members involved in the PB citizens panels. The evaluation will provide a clear account of the activity within each ward and pull together the strengths, challenges and key learning from the pilot overall. The GCPH will also make a series of recommendations for the next phase of PB within the City as well as providing some implications for the ‘mainstreaming’ of PB moving forward. On Tuesday this week, I attended and spoke at a Glasgow Disability Alliance event on disabled people’s experiences of participatory budgeting within the four ward based pilots. There is learning that has come from disabled peoples experiences, including access, resources to take part, peer support. I will ensure that this work will feed into our evaluation of PB. Following recess, I will set up a short life working group with cross party representation and officer support to take PB to the next level following on from the recommendations produced by the GCPH. The roll out of participatory budgeting is a key commitment for all local authorities and is a regular agenda item on the COSLA community wellbeing board, which I sit on. It is important that we as a council get this right, particularly ensuring that participation and community engagement is meaningful and we leave no one behind in this process. There will continue to be ongoing scrutiny and development at various council committees including OPSD, WECCE and Community Planning Partnership. Question: 4 (4) Councillor Malcolm Cunning To ask the City Convener for Neighbourhoods, Housing and Public Realm to Tabled Question update the chamber on discussions with the Scottish Government regarding the proposed Planning Bill. Cllr Kenny McLean, City Convener for Neighbourhoods, Housing and Public Responder Realm As the member will be aware, preparation of the Planning Bill followed a consultation triggered by the paper “Places, people and planning” issued by the Scottish Government in January 2017, and a consultation that ran to April 2017. The Bill was introduced to the Scottish Parliament on 4 December 2017 and passed Stage 3 on 20 June 2019. Over the period of the Bill, the Council considered a number of aspects, such as the possible introduction of third party or equal rights of appeal, and made its views known. The Council worked with the Heads of Planning Scotland to provide input to the detailed legislative process that has taken place over the past two years, and directly with the Scottish Government, including a meeting here in the City Chambers earlier this month. Following a period of four weeks to allow for any challenge through the parliament the bill will move to Royal Assent. Beyond that, there will be a series of secondary legislation procedures over the next few years to take forward the changes it has introduced. As mentioned in the parliamentary debate this will likely involve a large amount of collaborative work with Heads of Planning Scotland and individual local authorities. Question: 5 (5) Councillor Euan Blockley To ask the Leader of the Council, in relation to John Mason’s comments what Tabled Question proportion of Glasgow’s population are “elites”? Councillor Susan Aitken, Leader of the Council and City Convener for Inclusive Responder Economic Growth I’m afraid I can only answer questions which are relevant to the remit of Glasgow City Council. If you want to know more about John Mason MSPs comments I suggest you direct your question to him. Question: 6 (6) Bailie Kyle Thornton To ask the City Convener for Sustainability and Carbon Reduction what measures will be taken to ensure that the failure of the Neighbourhoods service to carry out Tabled Question grass cutting in recent weeks in a timely manner will not be repeated in the future? Responder Cllr Anna Richardson, City Convener for Sustainability and Carbon Reduction Members will be aware that we have a generic workforce and deploy resources according to local priorities, including grass cutting and cleansing services such as bulk uplift. Daily operational meetings continue to take place to monitor the deployment of resources city wide. As part of the neighbourhood approach, neighbourhood liaison teams have been working with all stakeholders to ensure the issues identified locally in relation to grass cutting are addressed. In particular, Neighbourhood Liaison Managers have been engaging directly with elected members on this issue and where there are issues in their areas, these matters are being resolved locally.
Recommended publications
  • Culture and Sport Glasgow
    Culture and Sport Glasgow (operating as Glasgow Life) (A Company which is a Scottish charity (Scottish charity number SC037844) incorporated in Scotland under the Companies Acts with company number SC313851) MINUTE of a MEETING of the Board of Directors of Culture and Sport Glasgow held via Videoconference on 25 November 2020 at 10am. Present: Councillor David McDonald (Chair) Councillor Eva Bolander Professor John Brown CBE Sir Angus Grossart (part meeting) Iain MacRitchie Dr Bridget McConnell CBE Lee McConnell John McCormick Councillor Frank McAveety (part meeting) Siobhan Nairn Councillor Franny Scally (part meeting) Dilawer Singh MBE Attending: Susan Deighan, Director of City Marketing and External Relations; Jan Buchanan, Director of Finance and Corporate Services; Billy Garrett, Director of Sport and Events; Jill Miller OBE, Director of Cultural Services; and Allan Drysdale, Governance and Liaison Officer; all Culture and Sport Glasgow. Apologies: Professor Sir Anton Muscatelli Councillor Michael Cullen 1. Welcome The Chief Executive welcomed those present to the meeting. Having noted that the relevant notice had been issued and a quorum was present, the Board proceeded to business as hereinafter minuted. 2. Apologies noted. 1 The Board noted that apologies had been received from Professor Sir Anton Muscatelli and Councillor Michael Cullen. 3. Appointment of Chairs agreed. The Chief Executive advised that in terms of Article 73 of the Company’s Articles of Association: ‘Each office shall be held (subject to article 74) until the conclusion of the annual general meeting which next follows; a director whose period of office expires under this article may be re-appointed to that office under article 71 (providing he/she is willing to act)’.
    [Show full text]
  • © Patricia M`Cafferty, May 2004. Abstract
    PATRICIA MCCAFFERTY WORKING THE 'THIRD WAY': NEW LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS, AND SCOTTISH DEVOLUTION THESIS PRESENTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW MAY 2004 © PATRICIA M`CAFFERTY, MAY 2004. ABSTRACT Labour's election victory in 1997 was heralded as a new era, the dawn of a Third Way, a novel attempt to chart a unique political course overcoming the perceivedlimitations of both New Right and Old Labour. In this thesis I explore the era of New Labour generally and, in particular, the impact of the Third Way on working lives. Key to my analysis is New Labour's attempt to synthesise oppositional interests,in particular those of capital and labour. This involves a crucial rhetoric of flexibility, competitivenessand partnership. My research explores the rhetoric of New Labour in relation to the reality of this new force in power. It does this by: " drawing out key features in the development of New Labour, especially its relation to Old Labour; " examining central elementsof New Labour ideology; " arguing that Scotland should be seen as central to the transition from Old to New :Labour; " utilising a case study of industrial relations developments in a major electronics factory in the West of Scotland and, to a lesser extent, key developmentsin public sector employment. My main finding is that where New Labour's ideology promisespositive benefits, the form of its implementation has negative impacts for workers. Since I take New Labour as a process, my thesis concludes with a more speculative exploration of possible future developments,both in relations to New Labour's role in them, and their possible impact on the New Labour project.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet
    MINISTERS, LAW OFFICERS AND Scottish MINISTERIAL PARLIAMENTARY AIDES BY Parliament CABINET: SESSION 1 Fact sheet This Fact sheet provides a list of all of the Scottish Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides during Session 1, from 12 May 1999 until the appointment of new Ministers in the second MSPs: Historical parliamentary session. Series Ministers and Law Officers continue to serve in post during 30 March 2007 dissolution. The first Session 2 cabinet was appointed on 21st May 2003. A Minister is a member of the government. The Scottish Executive is the government in Scotland for devolved matters and is responsible for formulating and implementing policy in these areas. The Scottish Executive is formed from the party or parties holding a majority of seats in the Parliament. During Session 1 the Scottish Executive consisted of a coalition of Labour and Liberal Democrat MSPs. The senior Ministers in the Scottish government are known as ‘members of the Scottish Executive’ or ‘the Scottish Ministers’ and together they form the Scottish ‘Cabinet’. They are assisted by junior Scottish Ministers. With the exception of the Scottish Law Officers, all Ministers must be MSPs. This fact sheet also provides a list of the Law Officers. The Scottish Law Officers listed advise the Scottish Executive on legal matters and represent its interests in court. The final section lists Ministerial Parliamentary Aides (MPAs). MPAs are MSPs appointed by the First Minister on the recommendation of Ministers whom they assist in discharging their duties. MPAs are unpaid and are not part of the Executive. Their role and the arrangements for their appointment are set out in paragraphs 4.6-4.13 of the Scottish Ministerial Code.
    [Show full text]
  • STEP up Conference 12Th May 2014: the Lighthouse, Glasgow
    STEP UP Conference 12th May 2014: The Lighthouse, Glasgow Developing the new Energy and Carbon Masterplan The Glasgow STEP UP team of Glasgow City Council, University of Strathclyde and Scottish Power Energy Networks held a successful stakeholder engagement event for the City’s new Energy and Carbon Masterplan at the Lighthouse in Glasgow on Monday the 12th of May (for agenda see Annex 1). Over seventy representatives from the private, public, voluntary and community sectors in Glasgow attended the half day event to learn more about the developing Energy and Carbon Master Plan. Attendees took part in workshops covering energy efficiency; local energy generation and district heating; transport and waste – each aimed at helping to identify actions for the new Plan. Plenary sessions Councillor Frank McAveety – Glasgow City Council Councillor Frank McAveety, Convenor of Glasgow City Council’s Sustainability and Environment Policy Development Committee, outlined Glasgow’s vision and commitment to becoming one of Europe’s most sustainable cities. Councillor McAveety went on to talk about how the city is focusing on regeneration and transformation to a low carbon economy, which will deliver social and economic benefits to Glasgow’s citizens. STEP UP Project Coordinator Richard Bellingham of University of Strathclyde, outlined the history of the STEP UP project and explained that STEP UP seeks to enhance existing sustainable energy action plans (SEAPs) in the four STEP UP cities of Ghent, Glasgow, Gothenburg and Riga while developing a process for enhancing SEAPs in cities across Europe. He highlighted the value in creating SEAPs in cities aiming to deliver faster progress towards European energy targets whilst also creating jobs, eliminating fuel poverty and ensuring energy security.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Session 3 Msps Not Standing Or Not Returned in the 2011 Election 6 May 2011 Msps: Historical Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet Session 3 MSPs Not Standing or Not Returned in the 2011 Election 6 May 2011 MSPs: Historical Series 48 Session 3 MSPs were not returned to the Scottish Parliament in Session 4. They either did not stand as a candidate for re-election, or they stood but were not re-elected. This fact sheet is divided into two sections. The first section lists those MSPs who stood for re- election but failed to win a seat. The second section lists those MSPs who were serving at the end of Parliamentary Session 3 (22 March 2011) but chose not to stand for re-election. Abbreviation Party Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation Session 3 MSPs who stood for re-election in 2011 but failed to win a seat: MSP Party Constituency (C) or Region (R) Robert Brown LD Glasgow (R) Derek Brownlee Con East Lothian (C), South Scotland (R) Bill Butler Lab Glasgow Anniesland (C) Cathie Craigie Lab Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (C) Ross Finnie LD Greenock and Inverclyde (C), West Scotland (R) Karen Gillon Lab Clydesdale (C) Charlie Gordon Lab Glasgow Cathcart (C) Andy Kerr Lab East Kilbride (C) Marilyn Livingstone Lab Kirkcaldy (C) Frank McAveety Lab Glasgow Shettleston (C) Tom McCabe Lab Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse (C) Anne McLaughlin SNP Glasgow Provan (C), Glasgow (R) Pauline McNeill Lab Glasgow Kelvin (C) Des McNulty Lab Clydebank and Milngavie (C)
    [Show full text]
  • Ag/S3/10/17 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU
    Ag/S3/10/17 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU AGENDA FOR MEETING ON TUESDAY 11 MAY 2010 2.00pm: Room Q1.03 1. Minutes (a) Draft minutes of 4 May 2010 (attached) (b) Matters arising 2. Future Business Programme (PB/S3/10/84) Legislation 3. (a) Historic Environment (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill – Stage 1 referral (PB/S3/10/85) 4. Opposition business allocation 2010-2011 (PB/S3/10/86) 5. Publication scheme – consideration of any exempt papers 6. Date of next meeting – Tuesday 18 May 2010 PB/S3/10/84 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU POSSIBLE MOTIONS FOR MEMBERS BUSINESS 1. Bureau Members will be aware that under Rule 5.6.1(c) the Bureau has a duty to ensure that there is a period of time available for Members’ Business following Decision Time. 2. Motions submitted for Members’ Business are shown below. S3M-6236# Stewart Maxwell: 65th Anniversary of VE Day—That the Parliament commemorates the 65th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day (VE Day) when on 8 May 1945 the Allied Forces formally accepted the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany; honours the contribution by veterans of all ages and from all conflicts; believes that there should be greater recognition of war veterans in Scotland, many of whom sustained severe physical or mental injuries in defending their country, and encourages veterans to take advantage of their eligibility for the Veterans’ Badge, a small, but visible token of society’s appreciation of their service. Supported by: Rob Gibson, Brian Adam, Maureen Watt, Andrew Welsh, Bob Doris, Des McNulty, Kenneth Gibson, Dave Thompson, Tricia Marwick, Stuart
    [Show full text]
  • MEMO Is Produced by the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities in Partnership with BEMIS
    3 November 2008 ISSUE 151 Minority Ethnic Matters Overview MEMO is produced by the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities in partnership with BEMIS . Supported b y It provides an overview of information of interest to minority ethnic communities in Scotland, including parliamentary activity at Holyrood and Westminster, new publications, consultations, forthcoming conferences and news reports. Contents Immigration and Asylum Other News Race Relations Bills in Progress Equality Consultations Racism and Religious Hatred Job Opportunities Other Holyrood Events/Conferences/Training Other Westminster Useful Links New Publications Note that some weblinks, particularly of newspaper articles, are only valid for a short period of time, usually around a month. Please send information for inclusion in MEMO to [email protected] and requests to be added to circulation to [email protected] Immigration and Asylum Holyrood Parliamentary Questions Jack McConnell (S3W-16800): To ask the Scottish Executive how many Leave to Remain visas have been requested in each year since the launch of the Fresh Talent initiative. Reply from Linda Fabiani: This is a matter for the UK Government. The Fresh Talent: Working in Scotland Scheme was managed by the Home Office, and information on the total number of Leave to Remain visas requested in each year is not routinely made available to the Scottish Government. I have asked the Home Office to write to you direct with this information. http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/pqa/wa-08/wa1030.htm Jack McConnell (S3W-16801): To ask the Scottish Executive how many Leave to Remain visas have been granted in each year since the launch of the Fresh Talent initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR RESILIENT GLASGOW a City Strategy
    OUR RESILIENT GLASGOW A City Strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER FROM COUNCIL LEADER, FRANK McAVEETY LETTER FROM GLASGOW CHIEF RESILIENCE OFFICER, ALASTAIR BROWN LETTER FROM 100RC PRESIDENT, MICHAEL BERKOWITZ 1 INTRODUCTION What is City Resilience? 100 Resilient Cities - Pioneered by The Rockerfeller Foundation (100RC) Our Resilience Strategy 2 GLASGOW, A CITY OF RESILIENCE AND TRANSFORMATION 3 OUR RESILIENCE STRATEGY Our Resilient Glasgow Vision Strategic Context Assessment of Resilience Activity Listening to Glaswegians 4 GLASGOW'S STRATEGIC PILLARS, GOALS AND ACTIONS Pillar 1 Empower Glaswegians Pillar 2 Unlock Place-Based Solutions Pillar 3 Innovate to Support Fair Economic Growth Pillar 4 Foster Civic Participation 5 DELIVERING THE STRATEGY 6 MONITORING PROGRESS • Appendix1: Summary of Resilient Glasgow Goals and Actions • Appendix2: Acknowledgements OUR RESILIENT GLASGOW STRATEGY 3 LETTER FROM COUNCIL LEADER FRANK McAVEETY Glasgow is a city which learns from its past and builds on its strengths. Our people are the backbone of our city and have always shown a willingness to adapt, change and reinvent during our long and rich history. As leader of the city, I am proud to present Glasgow’s first resilience strategy. This document shows us how we can adapt and grow no matter what challenges the future holds. Glasgow has weathered so much change throughout our history from the Councillor Frank McAveety industrial revolution and the decline of our traditional industries to the recent Leader of Glasgow City Council economic downturn. However we have always shown a flexibility and strength of character which has allowed us to capitalise on new opportunities for growth. Glasgow is already a resilient city but it is in our nature to want to do more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Parliament - Public Petitions Committee Report
    The Scottish Parliament - Public Petitions Committee Report https://archive.parliament.scot/s3/committees/petitions/reports-09/pur0... Back to the Public Petitions Committee Report Scottish Parliament Archive Home SP Paper 300 PU/S3/09/R3 Business 3rd Report, 2009 (Session 3) Bulletin 1999-2011 Inquiry into the public petitions process Minutes of Remit and membership Proceedings 1999-2011 Remit: Journal of To consider public petitions addressed to the Parliament in accordance with these Rules Parliamentary and, in particular, to— Proceedings Sessions 1 & (a) decide in a case of dispute whether a petition is admissible; 2 (b) decide what action should be taken upon an admissible public petition; and Committees Sessions 1, 2 (c) keep under review the operation of the petitions system. & 3 (Standing Orders of the Scottish Parliament, Rule 6.10) Annual reports Membership: Bill Butler Nigel Don Marlyn Glen Robin Harper Mr Frank McAveety (Convener) Anne McLaughlin Nanette Milne John Farquhar Munro (Deputy Convener) John Wilson Committee Clerking Team: Clerk to the Committee Fergus Cochrane Assistant Clerks Linda Smith Franck David Committee Assistant Eileen Martin Inquiry into the public petitions process The Committee reports to the Parliament as follows— 1. This is the report of a year long inquiry by the Public Petitions Committee into the public petitions process. This inquiry looked at how to improve— awareness of the existence of the public petitions process, particularly amongst hard to reach groups; participation in the process itself; and the scrutiny role fulfilled by the Committee. Format of report 2. The report is being published in both hard copy and e-format.
    [Show full text]
  • Msps by Party: Session 1
    MSP BY PARTY SESSION 1 Scottish Parliament This Fact sheet provides a list of all MSPs who served during Session 1, 6 May 1999 – 31 March 2003, arranged by party. Fact sheet The MSPs are listed in alphabetical order, by the party that they were elected to represent, with the party with most MSPs listed first. MSPs: Historical Statistical information about the number of MSPs in each party Series throughout session 1 can be found on the State of the Parties: Session 1 fact sheet. 9 January 2008 1 Scottish Labour Party Name Constituency / Region Wendy Alexander Paisley North Jackie Baillie Dumbarton Scott Barrie Dunfermline West Sarah Boyack Edinburgh Central Rhona Brankin Midlothian Bill Butler1 Glasgow Anniesland Malcolm Chisholm Edinburgh North and Leith Cathie Craigie Cumbernauld and Kilsyth Margaret Curran Glasgow Baillieston Susan Deacon Edinburgh East and Musselburgh Donald Dewar2 Glasgow Anniesland Helen Eadie Dunfermline East Patricia Ferguson Glasgow Maryhill Brian Fitzpatrick3 Strathkelvin and Bearsden Sam Galbraith4 Strathkelvin and Bearsden Karen Gillon Clydesdale Trish Godman West Renfrewshire Rhoda Grant Highlands and Islands Iain Gray Edinburgh Pentlands Hugh Henry Paisley South John Home Robertson East Lothian Janis Hughes Glasgow Rutherglen Gordon Jackson Glasgow Govan Sylvia Jackson Stirling Cathy Jamieson Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley Margaret Jamieson Kilmarnock and Loudoun Andy Kerr East Kilbride Johann Lamont Glasgow Polllok Marilyn Livingstone Kirkcaldy 1 Bill Butler was elected in the Glasgow Anniesland by-election on 23 November 2000. He replaced Donald Dewar 2 Donald Dewar died on 11 October 2000. He was replaced by Bill Butler 3 Brian Fitzpatrick was elected in the Strathkelvin and Bearsden by-election on 7 June 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • To All Animal Concern, Animal Concern Advice Line and Save Our Seals Fund Supporters
    E­MAIL FROM: John F. Robins, Secretary and Campaigns Consultant, Animal Concern, ​ Post Office Box 5178, Dumbarton G82 5YJ. Tel. 01389­841­639, Mobile: 07721­605521. E­MAIL: [email protected] website: http://www.animalconcern.org/ ​ ​ Animal Concern is a pressure group registered as a non­profit making Limited Company (Co. No. SC109126) incorporated in 1988 as Animal Concern (Scotland) Ltd. It incorporates the Scottish Anti­Vivisection Society which was founded in 1876. To all Animal Concern, Animal Concern Advice Line and Save Our Seals Fund supporters. Responses sought from those of you in Scotland, the U.K. and Glasgow. This is a short list of things I hope you will be able to do. My apologies if any or all of this is not relevant to yourself. Remember if you don’t want to receive these e­mails just hit reply and tell me you want taken off the list. I try not to flood you with emails but I don’t want to annoy you by sending material you no longer want to receive. If you know of others in the relevant areas who might take the actions outlined below I’d be grateful if you would forward this e­mail to them. 1: For supporters in Scotland and any others with relevant info on the use of dog training ​ ​ ​ collars: A very important Scottish Government Consultation on the use of electronic collars to train dogs. What we want is a total ban on the use of electric shock collars and regulation on the use of sonic and spray emitting collars.
    [Show full text]