Nevada Economy in Brief April 2020 a Monthly Review of Workforce and Economic Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nevada Economy in Brief April 2020 a Monthly Review of Workforce and Economic Information Nevada Economy In Brief April 2020 A Monthly Review of Workforce and Economic Information Economic Summary Economic Indicators In this release, we provide up- preliminary Current Employment UNEMPLOYMENT RATES April 2020 Nevada* 28.2% dates on our primary employment, Statistics (CES) estimates show Las Vegas MSA 33.5% unemployment and unemploy- that seasonally adjusted employ- Reno-Sparks MSA 19.6% Carson City MSA 21.4% ment insurance programs. This ment decreased by 244,800 from United States* 14.7% month’s report is the first monthly March to April. Job losses impact- JOB GROWTH (YOY) April 2020 employment and unemployment ed all industries in the State, par- Nevada* -18.0% report which really captures the ticularly the Leisure and Hospital- Las Vegas MSA* -20.8% Reno-Sparks MSA* -9.9% impact of COVID-19 on Nevada’s ity and other service sectors. The Carson City MSA* -12.4% labor market. This data reflects construction industry was the only United States* -13.4% the employment status of individu- industry to realize an increase of als as of the week of April 12-18. employment over the year and GAMING WIN (YOY) March 2020 Nevada -39.6% added 500 jobs. The private sec- Clark County -38.1% Information on how to file an un- tor realized a decrease of 235,800 Washoe County -52.9% employment insurance claim, jobs in April while the public sector where to get updates from DETR, realized a decrease of 9,000 jobs. TAXABLE SALES (YOY) February 2020 or what other services are avail- (Refer to Figure:1) Nevada 5.6% able from the department can be Clark County 6.2% Washoe County 4.9% found at the end of this write-up. Nevada’s seasonally adjusted Additional labor market informa- employment total is 1,159,800 *Seasonally Adjusted tion can be found on our website jobs in April. This is lowest em- www.nevadaworkforce.com. The ployment level we have seen in Unemployment Rate by County Pandemic Unemployment Assis- the State since January of 2013, tance (PUA) program is now live when employment was 1,158,800. and accepting applications. Those Total employment declined by 18 Humboldt Elko who qualify for PUA assistant can percent over the year, the larg- access the website following the est decline seen in series history Pershing link below: dating back to 1990. The nation https://detr.nv.gov/Page/ also realized the largest decline Washoe Eureka Pandemic_Unemployment_ in employment over the year in Churchill White Storey Pine Assistance(PUA) series history, decreasing by 12.9 Lyon Lander percent. Nationally, employment Mineral Nye Employment growth for this period was the Carson slowest it’s been in series history Douglas Esmeralda April Employment Situation as well. (Refer to Figure:2) Lincoln As the impact of the COVID-19 1Non-seasonally adjusted em- Less Than or Equal to 6.0% pandemic and associated busi- ployment in Nevada declined over Between 6.1% and 11.9% ness closures set in, employment1 the month by 238,00 jobs in April. Clark in Nevada fell drastically. April Seasonal adjustment subtracts Between 12.0% and 17.9% 1 Non-seasonally adjusted employment in Nevada declined over the month by 238,000 jobs in April. Seasonal adjustment sub- Between 18.0 and 23.9% tracts out the normal seasonal changes to better understand the underlying shifts in employment. Typically, from March to Between 24.0 and 29.9% April we would expect the state to add 6.800 jobs. The difference between the actual change and the expected change in jobs is reported as the seasonally adjusted employment level which shows a decrease in the underlying trend in employment from Greater Than or Equal to 30.0% March to April. NevadaWorkforce.com RESEARCH Nevada’s premier source of & workforce and economic @NVLaborMarket ANALYSIS information and analysis P: (775) 684 - 0450 Economic Summary Economy in Brief April 2020 out the normal seasonal changes to better under- stand the underlying shifts in employment. Typi- cally, from March to April we would expect the State to add 6,800 jobs. The difference between the actual change and the expected change in jobs is reported as the seasonally adjusted em- ployment level which shows a decrease in the underlying trend in employment from March to April. UI Claims Don’t Compare to CES Employment Losses It is important to note that the CES survey defi- nition looks at employment for the pay period including the 12th of the month. If someone receives pay for any portion of that pay period, then they are counted as employed. As several businesses (at least in the short term) have de- cided to continue paying staff that are unable to work, it is important to note that these employ- Figure 3 ees have been counted as employed in the CES employment estimates. This can result in notice- able differences when comparing CES data to other estimates of the labor force. For the household and establishment surveys, the data for a given month relate to a particular April 2020 (employment in 000) Last �me Last �me monthly Last �me monthly Industry Employm Monthy Monthy % Date Employm Date Monthly Date Monthly ent Level Change Change (M/Y) ent Level (M/Y) Change (M/Y) Change Total Nonfarm 1159.8 -244.8 -17.4% Jan-13 1158.8 Oct-01 -17.0 Oct-01 1.6% Mining and Logging 14.1 -0.4 -2.8% May-17 14.0 Apr-00 -0.6 Apr-00 -5.3% Construction 95.5 -7.8 -7.6% Apr-19 95.0 Jan-10 -5.4 Jan-10 -8.0% Manufacturing 54.6 -4.3 -7.3% May-18 54.5 Apr-03 -1.3 Jan-09 -2.9% Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 219.8 -34.8 -13.7% Apr-13 218.9 Dec-08 -2.9 Dec-08 -1.3% Information 15.1 -0.5 -3.2% Apr-17 14.9 Jul-14 -1.6 Oct-91 -12.6% Financial Activities 67.6 -0.8 -1.2% Jan-19 67.5 Jan-09 -1.1 Jan-09 -1.9% Professional and Business Services 158.8 -39 -19.7% Sep-14 158.3 Oct-08 -5.8 Oct-08 -3.8% Education and Health Services 128.7 -16.3 -11.2% Sep-16 128.4 Oct-19 -0.8 Jun-92 -1.8% Leisure and Hospitality 216.3 -122.2 -36.1% Nov-93 211.7 Oct-01 -11.2 Oct-01 -3.7% Other Services 31.2 -9.7 -23.7% Nov-03 31.1 Jan-05 -1.2 Jan-05 -3.5% Government 158.1 -9 -5.4% Jun-16 155.0 Jun-00 -6.2 Jun-00 -5.0% NevadaWorkforce.com Department of Employment, @NVLaborMarket Training & Rehabilitation Economic Summary Economy in Brief April 2020 week or pay period. In the household survey, the reference period is generally the calendar week that contains the 12th day of the month, in this case April 12–18. In the establishment Employment by Industry: April 2020, 10 Year High & Low survey, the reference period is the pay period 400 that includes the 12th of the month, regardless 350 356.4 of the length of the pay period. (The length of the reference period does vary across businesses 300 263.2 in the establishment survey; one-third of busi- 250 nesses have a weekly pay period, slightly over 209.3 216.3 200 204.5 40 percent a bi-weekly, about 20 percent semi- 167.1 monthly, and a small amount monthly.) 150 146.4 147.9 134.9 100 103.3 100.9 Every week, the Department of Labor’s Employ- 70.5 59.9 50 49.9 52.2 ment and Training Administration (ETA) reports 42.2 37.7 31.2 1115..98 1126..42 the number of people filing initial and continuing 0 claims for UI benefits. Because the UI claims data are a weekly series, they can capture the impact of shocks more quickly than the BLS monthly household and establishment surveys, such as the CES survey, particularly when these shocks hit between survey reference periods. Currnent Month 10 Year High 10 Year Low For more information please follow the link listed below: https://www.bls.gov/cps/employment-situation- covid19-faq-april-2020.pdf Great Recession Employment Impacts COVID-19 Pandemic Employment Impacts % Jobs % Jobs lost Change April 2020 Lost/Below Change Pre-Great recession (Peak- from Trough Previous from Sector Peak Trough (low) Trough) Peak Pre-COVID-19 Peak (low) Peak Peak Professional and business services 1 61,800 Feb-07 132,500 Jul-09 2 9,300 18% 204,500 Jan-20 158,800 45,700 22% Other services 37,500 Jan-08 32,000 Oct-11 5,500 15% 4 2,200 Oct-18 31,200 11,000 26% Trade, transportation, and utilities 2 35,200 Dec-07 209,600 Mar-10 2 5,600 11% 263,200 Oct-19 219,800 43,400 16% Leisure and hospitality 3 42,900 Dec-07 304,000 Nov-09 3 8,900 11% 356,400 Feb-19 216,300 140,100 39% Financial activities 65,800 Dec-06 52,400 Jun-11 1 3,400 20% 7 0,500 Dec-19 67,600 2,900 4% Manufacturing 50,900 Sep-06 37,600 Oct-10 1 3,300 26% 5 9,900 Feb-19 54,600 5,300 9% Information 15,900 Feb-07 12,000 Nov-11 3,900 25% 1 6,200 May-18 15,100 1,100 7% Construction 1 46,400 Jun-06 50,100 Mar-12 9 6,300 66% 103,000 Mar-20 95,500 7,500 7% Government Non-cyclical 167,100 Mar-20 158,100 9,000 5% Mining and logging Non-cyclical 1 5,000 Mar-19 14,100 900 6% Education and health services Non-cyclical 146,400 Feb-20 128,700 17,700 12% Total 1,297,300 Mar-07 1 ,112,600 Sep-10 184,700 14.2% 1,429,600 Jan-20 1,159,800 284,600 19.9% Figure 6 NevadaWorkforce.com Department of Employment, @NVLaborMarket Training & Rehabilitation Economic Summary Economy in Brief April 2020 Nevada Employment Recovery Differences in How the CES National and State 1,500,000 and Area Estimates are Developed Current: 1,440,100 1,450,000 Decmber 2019 The methodology used to develop National 1,400,000 Peak: 1,297,300 CES estimates and State and Area estimates 1,350,000 differs primarily in two areas.
Recommended publications
  • GMU, EMU, and the Bundesbank: the Political Economy of Recent EMS-Crises
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hefeker, Carsten Working Paper GMU, EMU, and the Bundesbank: The political economy of recent EMS-crises Diskussionsbeiträge - Serie II, No. 221 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, University of Konstanz Suggested Citation: Hefeker, Carsten (1994) : GMU, EMU, and the Bundesbank: The political economy of recent EMS-crises, Diskussionsbeiträge - Serie II, No. 221, Universität Konstanz, Sonderforschungsbereich 178 - Internationalisierung der Wirtschaft, Konstanz This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/101700 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Economic Recession Through Effective Tax Collection: the Nigerian Experience
    International Research in Economics and Finance; Vol. 1, No. 1; December, 2017 ISSN 2529-8038 Published by July Press Managing Economic Recession through Effective Tax Collection: The Nigerian Experience D. O. Gbegi1, J. F. Adebisi2 & Bodunde Tosin3 1 Department of Accounting Finance, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria 2 Director General, Nigerian College of Accountancy, Kwall, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria 3 Department of Accounting, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria Correspondence: D. O. Gbegi, Department of Accounting Finance, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria. Received: December 9, 2017 Accepted: December 27, 2017 Online Published: December 31, 2017 doi:10.20849/iref.v1i1.274 URL: https://doi.org/10.20849/iref.v1i1.274 Abstract Economic recession has eaten deep into the economy to the extent that taxes generated cannot serve as a pivot upon which the economy could strive. This study examines how economic recession can be managed through effective tax collection. Secondary data was obtained from the CBN statistical bulletin between periods of 2003 to 2016. Regression technique was used in testing the data collected with the aid of E-VIEWS. The study revealed that taxes do not have significant positive effect on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product, Government Spending, Capacity Utilization and Money Supply. Thus, it implies that taxes in Nigeria are rather unfortunately underexploited, which is an indication of poor tax collection system. This study therefore concludes that, tax should be considered as the urgent and needful panacea to rescue the current economic illness that Nigeria is currently facing. This should be done by ensuring that relevant tax authorities have good tax collection system like effective tax data base, effective E-tax registration, effective E-tax payment and all tax payers should have tax identification number.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring and Predicting Heterogeneous Recessions
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Research Papers in Economics KOÇ UNIVERSITY-TÜSİAD ECONOMIC RESEARCH FORUM WORKING PAPER SERIES MEASURING AND PREDICTING HETEROGENEOUS RECESSIONS Cem Çakmaklı Richard Paap Dick van Dijk Working Paper 1206 February 2012 KOÇ UNIVERSITY-TÜSİAD ECONOMIC RESEARCH FORUM Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer/Istanbul Measuring and Predicting Heterogeneous Recessions ∗ Cem C¸akmaklı y,1 Richard Paap z,2 Dick van Dijk x,2 1Department of Quantitative Economics, University of Amsterdam 2Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam October 2011 Abstract This paper conducts an empirical analysis of the heterogeneity of recessions in monthly U.S. coincident and leading indicator variables. Univariate Markov- switching models indicate that it is appropriate to allow for two distinct reces- sion regimes, corresponding with `mild' and `severe' recessions. All downturns start with a mild decline in the level of economic activity. Contractions that develop into severe recessions mostly correspond with periods of substantial credit squeezes as suggested by the ‘financial accelerator' theory. Multivari- ate Markov-switching models that allow for phase shifts between the cyclical regimes of industrial production and the Conference Board Leading Economic Index confirm these findings. Keywords: Business cycle, phase shifts, regime-switching models, Bayesian analysis JEL Classification: C11, C32, C51, C52, E32 ∗We would like to thank Paolo Giordani, Mark Jensen, Gary Koop, John Maheu, Hashem Pesaran and Rodney Strachan for helpful comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank conference participants at the 2nd Conference on Recent Developments in Macroeconomics (ZEW, Mannheim, June 2010), the Rimini Conference in Economics and Finance (RCEF'10; Rimini, June 2010) and seminar participants at the Tinbergen Institute and the Helsinki Center of Economic Research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Home Depot, Inc
    The Home Depot, Inc. Equity Valuation Manuel Nora Dissertation written under the supervision of Prof. José Carlos Tudela Martins Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of requirements for the MSc in Finance, at the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, June 14th. Manuel Nora 30 April 2020 Sector: Retail - Home Improvement The Home Depot, Inc. (HD.N) Buy Recommendation Buy recommendation: This study establishes a 12-month target price of $269.3, NYSE: HD; USD 221.6 Equity Valuation Equity exposing the investor to a potential positive return of 22% compared to the Price Target USD 263.9 ↑ 22% current price. The target price was achieved using the DCF-method (WACC Scenario Analysis approach) supported by an in-depth analysis of the sector, macroeconomic Current L Shape U Shape V Shape Price recovery recovery recovery perspectives and the company’s financial reality. $221.6 $229.6 $239.2 $263.9 Profile: Headquartered in United States, Home Depot is the world’s largest ↑6% ↑11% ↑22% home improvement retailer and the fourth-largest US retailer. The company Key Data operates also in Canada and Mexico. The company offers three major product Market Cap: $238.02 billion lines: Building Materials (37%), Décor (33%) and Hardline (30%). The 52-week high: $247.02 (20/02/2020) company’s main customers can be divided in two types, DIY and professional 52-week low: $152.15 (20/03/2020) # Shares Outstanding: 1.07 billion customers. Free Float: 99.87% Market Leadership: Home Depot is a market leader (51% market share) with One-year Indexed (Weekly) Performance 130% Lowe’s as its main rival (35% market share).
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Basic Education and Economic Recession: the Need for Entrepreneurship Education
    Vol. 7(1), pp. 1-5, March 2019 DOI: 10.14662/IJARER2019.010 International Journal of Copy © right 2019 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article Academic Research in ISSN: 2360-7866 Education and Review http://www.academicresearchjournals.org/IJARER/Index.htm Full Length Research Universal Basic Education and Economic Recession: The Need for Entrepreneurship Education 1Dr. Justina Lere Charles-Zalakoro and 2Beetseh, Kwaghga 1Department of Arts Education, Faculty of Education, Niger Delta University Wilberforce Island, Amassoma Bayelsa State. E-mail: [email protected] 2Library Department University of Agriculture Makurdi, PMB 2373 Benue State Nigeria. Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]/[email protected] Accepted 17 March 2019 Entrepreneurship education is necessary especially in this era of economic instability in the country. In recent times, the foundation level of education has most been affected. The present economic situation in Nigeria has destabilized our UBE programme in achieving its policy. This instability has generated negative effects on the basic education system. Although education had been in crisis for many years, the situation has recently been made worse by recession. Much of the difficulty in the universal basic education lies in the fact that the sector is poorly funded. This paper discusses the characteristics and vision for basic education, factors that lead to economic recession, concept of economic recession and entrepreneurship education for economic recovery. Finally it was recommended that government efforts on entrepreneurship development should move from the drawing board of dailies to concrete and practical steps, which are physical and graphical among others. Keywords: Universal Basic Education, economic recession and entrepreneurship education.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring and Predicting Heterogeneous Recessions
    TI 2011-154/4 Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Measuring and Predicting Heterogeneous Recessions Cem Cakmakli1 Richard Paap2 Dick van Dijk2 1 Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Amsterdam; 2 Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, and Tinbergen Institute. Tinbergen Institute is the graduate school and research institute in economics of Erasmus University Rotterdam, the University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam. More TI discussion papers can be downloaded at http://www.tinbergen.nl Tinbergen Institute has two locations: Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam Gustav Mahlerplein 117 1082 MS Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)20 525 1600 Tinbergen Institute Rotterdam Burg. Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)10 408 8900 Fax: +31(0)10 408 9031 Duisenberg school of finance is a collaboration of the Dutch financial sector and universities, with the ambition to support innovative research and offer top quality academic education in core areas of finance. DSF research papers can be downloaded at: http://www.dsf.nl/ Duisenberg school of finance Gustav Mahlerplein 117 1082 MS Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)20 525 8579 Measuring and Predicting Heterogeneous Recessions ∗ Cem C¸akmaklı y,1 Richard Paap z,2 Dick van Dijk x,2 1Department of Quantitative Economics, University of Amsterdam 2Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam October 2011 Abstract This paper conducts an empirical analysis of the heterogeneity of recessions in monthly U.S. coincident and leading indicator variables. Univariate Markov- switching models indicate that it is appropriate to allow for two distinct reces- sion regimes, corresponding with `mild' and `severe' recessions. All downturns start with a mild decline in the level of economic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Staatliche Verantwortung Und Staatliches Versagen in Der Coronakrise
    Staatliche Verantwortung und staatliches Versagen in der Coronakrise von Frank Bodmer Dr. Frank Bodmer ist Privatdozent an der Universität Basel www.frankbodmer.ch [email protected] ISBN 978-3-9525396-1-3 © Frank Bodmer Publiziert als pdf Zweite, korrigierte Fassung St.Gallen, 15.4.2021 Das vorliegende Dokument darf für nichtkommerzielle Zwecke und unter Beachtung der übli- chen Zitierregeln frei genutzt werden. Für kommerzielle Zwecke wird um Kontaktaufnahme gebeten. 3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Die Fehler im staatlichen Krisenmanagement ............................................... 5 1.1 Eine neue Art von Systemkrise ...................................................................... 6 1.2 Risiken des Handelns versus Risiken des Unterlassens ................................. 7 1.3 Zwang versus Selbstverantwortung ............................................................... 8 1.4 Zielkonflikte und fehlender Konsens ............................................................. 9 1.5 Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse als Basis für das Krisenmanagement? .................. 10 1.6 Ein neues Risikomanagement für Pandemien .............................................. 11 2 Die gesundheitliche Krise ............................................................................ 13 2.1 Gesundheitliche Aspekte von Covid-19 ...................................................... 13 2.2 Die Sterblichkeit ........................................................................................... 15 2.3 Fallzahlen und Todeszahlen im internationalen Vergleich
    [Show full text]
  • Ijmt Issn: 2249-1058
    March IJMT Volume 2, Issue 3 ISSN: 2249-1058 2012 __________________________________________________________ Global Recession and its Impact on Developing Economies Smt.S.Binduja* Dr.V.J.R.Emerlson Moses** __________________________________________________________ Introduction: In economics, a recession is a business cycle contraction, a general slowdown in economic activity. During recessions, many macroeconomic indicators vary in a similar way. Production, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP), employment, investment spending, capacity utilization, household incomes, business profits, and inflation all fall, while bankruptcies and the unemployment rate rise. Recessions generally occur when there is a widespread drop in spending, often following an adverse supply shock or the bursting of an economic bubble. Governments usually respond to recessions by adopting expansionary macroeconomic policies, such as increasing money supply, increasing government spending and decreasing taxation. Definition: In a 1975 New York Times article, economic statistician Julius Shiskin suggested several rules of thumb for defining a recession, one of which was "two down consecutive quarters of GDP". In time, the other rules of thumb were forgotten. Some economists prefer a definition of a 1.5% rise in unemployment within 12 months. In the United States,the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is generally seen as the authority for dating US recessions. The NBER defines an economic recession as: "a significant * HOD & Assistant Professor of Economics, Sree Devi Kumari Women’s College, Kuzhithurai. ** Assistant Professor and Research Guide, PG & Research Department of Economics, Muthurangam Govt. Arts College, Vellore. A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage, India as well as in Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Update: Coronavirus and the Markets - What We’Re Watching
    May 15, 2020 Update: Coronavirus and the Markets - What We’re Watching Reopening – it’s all we are focused on these days and rightfully so, everyone is itching to get back to some semblance of normalcy after a few months of quarantined life. A new normal is inevitable – a new way of working, of dining, of shopping, of flying, of greeting each other – while it can be uncomfortable, in some ways it’s a good thing. It will force us to be creative, to be innovative and try new ways of living. Technology is a prime example of this – what would have taken us years to adopt and trust, we’ve had to implement and rely heavily on in a matter of weeks. It’s presented a more human side to our daily interactions as well. The virtual structure has created a more personal environment and helped us communicate differently. It took us out of the board room and into a more intimate environment with casual attire and dogs and kids in the background. Reopening may in some ways bring us back to where we were and in other ways change us permanently. Regardless of what life post COVID-19 looks like, reopening needs to be met with great caution. Scientists and government officials alike comment reopening too quickly could cause more harm than good. Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a member of the White House coronavirus task force testified in front of a Senate committee this week noting just that, unless states are equipped to handle a potential sudden surge in cases, they should strongly consider the speed at which they open.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stand out Partnerships During a Recession
    Building Stand Out Partnerships During a Recession A historical look at how profit-purpose partnerships are impacted by recession…and how 2020 is different 2020 Profit-Purpose Partnerships Recession Report 1 ECONOMIC AND PHILANTHROPIC CORRELATION Historically, the state of the economy and the state of philanthropy are directly correlated. Both typically witness a decline in times of recession and reap a surge in fundraising in times of economic recovery. However, with the extreme rise of corporate citizenship over the past decade and the unprecedented circumstances of our recent recession, we wanted to answer two questions: 1. What’s the relationship between corporate giving and a recession? 2. What might be different about this recession from previous ones that would ignite different outcomes for profit-purpose partnerships? 2020 Profit-Purpose Partnerships Recession Report 2 STATE OF THE UNION 2020 Profit-Purpose Partnerships Recession Report 3 STATE OF THE UNION: THE ECONOMY ECONOMIC U.S. GDP growth will contract by INTEREST RATES OIL & GAS Worldwide crude oil prices will GROWTH average $41 a barrel for the second 6.5% in 2020 (declined by 5% in 1st half of 2020 and $50/b in 2021. quarter alone). It will rebound to a Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 5% growth rate in 2021 and 3.5% It lowered in 2022. the current fed CLIMATE CHANGE Source: Federal Open Market Committee, 06.10.20 funds rate to a range between Extreme weather caused by climate UNEMPLOYMENT INFLATION 0.0% and change is forcing farms, utilities, and 0.25%. Federal other companies to declare Reserve has Inflation will average 0.8% in restarted its bankruptcy.
    [Show full text]
  • Intro: MARKUS BRUNNERMEIER Twitter: @Markuseconomist Markus’ Intro
    Intro: MARKUS BRUNNERMEIER Twitter: @MarkusEconomist Markus’ intro ▪ Previous/future webinars ▪ Jeremy Stein Fed-Treasury Credit Programs ▪ John Cochrane Economics of reopening ▪ Speakers The 3 crises ▪ Health crisis ▪ Health contagion ▪ Gaining time Shut-down ▪ Economy crisis ▪ Supply (chains), demand (hoarding) ▪ Shutdown ▪ Financial crisis ▪ Liquidity, solvency contagion 5/18/2020 3 Health and economic crisis 5/18/2020 4 Friedman “plucking model” Log of GDP Holds reasonable well for US during 1960 - 2008 but not internationally (Dupraz, Nakamura, Steinsson 2019) time ▪ What if there can be bubbles building up and bursting? 5/18/2020 5 US GDP in log scale 2008-Break in - Level - slope 5/18/2020 6 US GDP in log scale Housing bubble No recession, but NASDAQ bubble Reduced growth 2008 Break in - Level - Slope 5/18/2020 7 Audacity of what slope? ▪ stylized 2008 Break in 2020 COVID - Level - Slope 5/18/2020 8 COVID speeds up existing trends? ▪ Long-term trend COVID shock ▪ Negative or positive trends (home-office, tele-medice, …) ▪ See Tyler Cowen’s YouTube video 5/18/2020 9 Shocks and amplification ▪ Pre-crisis buildup ▪ Nature of the initial economic shock ▪ Temporary vs. permanent (V, U, L-shaped) ▪ Supply vs. demand (1970s) ▪ Aggregate vs. idiosyncratic (finance) ▪ … ▪ Nature of amplification/feedback effects/spirals/non-linearities ▪ Risk-on to risk-off: Flight-to-safety ▪ Runs, spirals ▪ Multiple equilibria Permanent vs. temporary shock ▪ What’s optimal policy? ▪ Blanchard’s 2 phases of crises ▪ “Whatever it takes” phase ▪ “Oh my god,
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring and Predicting Heterogeneous Recessions
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Çakmaklı, Cem; Paap, Richard; van Dijk, Dick Working Paper Measuring and Predicting Heterogeneous Recessions Working Paper, No. 1206 Provided in Cooperation with: Koç University - TÜSİAD Economic Research Forum, Istanbul Suggested Citation: Çakmaklı, Cem; Paap, Richard; van Dijk, Dick (2012) : Measuring and Predicting Heterogeneous Recessions, Working Paper, No. 1206, Koç University-TÜSİAD Economic Research Forum (ERF), Istanbul This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/108590 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]