DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitat Comparison of Pseudacris F. Feriarum and Pseudacris C. Crucifer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitat Comparison of Pseudacris F. Feriarum and Pseudacris C. Crucifer Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 1-1-2008 Habitat Comparison of Pseudacris f. feriarum and Pseudacris c. crucifer with Emphasis on Associated Plant Communities and Distribution of Clemmys guttata and Pseudacris f. feriarum in West Virginia Scott oJ seph Albaugh [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Albaugh, Scott osJ eph, "Habitat Comparison of Pseudacris f. feriarum and Pseudacris c. crucifer with Emphasis on Associated Plant Communities and Distribution of Clemmys guttata and Pseudacris f. feriarum in West Virginia" (2008). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 436. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Habitat Comparison of Pseudacris f. feriarum and Pseudacris c. crucifer with Emphasis on Associated Plant Communities and Distribution of Clemmys guttata and Pseudacris f. feriarum in West Virginia Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences by Scott Joseph Albaugh Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chair Charles Somerville, Committee Member Dan Evans, Committee Member December, 2008 Abstract Habitat Comparison of Pseudacris f. feriarum and Pseudacris c. crucifer in West Virginia with Emphasis on Associated Plant Communities and Distribution of Clemmys guttata and Pseudacris f. feriarum in West Virginia SCOTT J. ALBAUGH. Dept of Biological Science, Marshall University, 1 John Marshall Dr., Huntington, WV 25755 Upland Chorus Frogs (Pseudacris f. feriarum) are a rare species in West Virginia. They occur in aquatic habitats across parts of the eastern and southern U.S. Pseudacris f. feriarum collection records in West Virginia suggest that their distribution is limited to the eastern panhandle and Ridge and Valley region where they are very rare and imperiled. Distribution information is needed for future management strategies. To help conserve this rare species, key life history habits were identified through the investigation of plant communities that are associated with them. Data on Pseudacris f. feriarum distribution in West Virginia was determined by conducting auditory surveys at historic sites as well as potential new sites in order to gain a better idea of where populations exist in the state. Vegetation analysis and water quality tests were conducted wherever Pseudacris f. feriarum were found. Similar data were also gathered from areas where Pseudacris c. crucifer (Northern Spring Peeper) were found so that these wetlands can be compared to wetlands where the Pseudacris f. feriarum were located. This comparison has shown the importance of plants associated with each Pseudacris species in its aquatic habitats. The result of this undertaking has been a clearer understanding of the distribution of Pseudacris f. feriarum and its association with wetland plants and Pseudacris c. crucifer. Spotted Turtles (Clemmys guttata) are a species of special concern in West Virginia. Trapping and haphazard searches were conducted during spring of 2007 and 2008 in order to learn more about the species distribution so that successful management strategies could be implemented. During this project historical sites were searched, as well as new potential habitat where found. The results were that only two turtles were found, both at Altona Marsh. It is very possible that this species now resides at only two or three locations in West Virginia. ii Acknowledgments There are two individuals who deserve the most thanks in helping me get to this point. The first is Zachary Loughman who at some time during the winter of 2006 said to me, “Why don’t you go to Marshall?” Zac and I had been discussing my intentions of attending graduate school. At that time my intentions hadn’t evolved into action, but it was Zac who encouraged me to contact Dr. Pauley and to send in the admissions application. Once I was accepted and was working on my research, I knew that I could always call Zac with any questions and he would give me his two cents. (Zac’s two cents on field research are invaluable.) I talked to Zac when I was setting my project up, when I was in the field, and when I was writing my thesis. I talked to Zac when during moments when I was feeling discouraged and he always gave me the pep talk that I needed. For anyone doing biological field work, Zac is a good man to know. I am truly blessed to call Zac my friend. The other person who has enabled me to achieve this degree is Dr. Thomas K. Pauley. I am so fortunate to have worked with and been advised by a true leader in the field of Biology. Dr. Pauley is in a class by himself. He is not just an advisor; he is a true role model. Seldom does a man come along with such an ability to influence young people not only in their academic experience, but also in their lives. Dr. Pauley is a man that leads by example. He is a man that leads with character and integrity. He never has to ask for respect from his students. We respect him without reservation because of the great human being that he is. Dr. Pauley is a great teacher, naturalist, scientist, and person all rolled into one. I doubt that I will encounter many more men in my life that I will hold in such high regard. I also want to thank Dr. Dan Evans, and Dr. Charles Somerville. I chose these two men to be on my graduate committee because they are professors who are passionate about what they do. They are men who care about their students and who have the innate desire to instill knowledge and to see students succeed. They are great teachers. They are also men whose character and integrity shine through in all they do. Dr. Evans and Dr. Somerville are also men that I have grown to respect and admire. Thanks also to my mother and grandmother who offered an immeasurable amount of love and support in the last two years. I was assisted in the field by Reid Downer, Kerie Corley, Dr. Pauley, and Zac Loughman. Field work is always easier when you have help and company. Thank you. Linda Case gave me full access to her farm on Bullskin Run in Jefferson County. She also supplied me with a warm and comfortable place to stay. Much of my Spotted Turtle work in Jefferson County would have been more difficult and complicated had Linda not been so gracious and accommodating. I only wish I had found a Spotted Turtle on her property. Thanks also to the private landowners in Morgan County who granted me access to their property. Lastly I would like to thank the West Virginia Department of Natural Resources Heritage Program for funding this research. iii Table of Contents Title Page…………………………………………………………………………………i Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………...ii Acknowledgements…………………………………………...………………………….iii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..v List of Figures………………………………………………………..………………….vii Part One: Distribution of Spotted Turtle (Clemmys guttata) in the eastern panhandle of West Virginia……………...……………………………………………………...1 Part Two: Habitat Comparison of Pseudacris f. feriarum and Pseudacris c. crucifer in West Virginia with Emphasis on Associated Plant Communities and Distribution……………………………………………………………………...21 Chapter 1: Habitat Comparison and Study Site Descriptions…………………………...21 Chapter 2: Species Accounts: Collection and Comparison of Upland Chorus Frog (P. feriarum) and Northern Spring Peeper (P. crucifer)……………….……...……51 Chapter 3: Vegetation Study To Determine Presence of Indicator Plants………………64 Chapter 4: Chapter 4: Distribution of Pseudacris feriarum in West Virginia……..……73 Literature Cited………………………………………………………………………….82 iv List of Tables 1. Results of Humphries 2002 Distribution Study……………………………………………………………………………….10 2. Locations and Effort for Spotted Turtle Searches…………………………………21 1.1 Average Variables For Each Site During Study…………………..……………….32 1.2 P. feriarum study sites……………………………………………………………..32 1.3 Site Variables for Private Wetland Number 1……………………………………..33 1.4 Site Variables for Private Wetland Number 2……………………………………..34 1.5 Site Variables for Private Wetland Number 3……………………………………..35 1.6 Site Variables for Dawson Wetland…………..……………………………...…….36 2.1 Size and Position Data for All P. feriarum………………………..……………….57 2.2 Size and Position Data for All P. crucifer…………………………………………59 2.3 Trap Data for Private Wetland 1…………………………………………….……..60 2.4 Trap Data for Private Wetland 2………………………………………….………..60 2.5 Trap Data for Private Wetland 3…………………………………………….……..60 3.1 Vegetative Groups Present in Areas Where P. feriarum was caught………….…..69 3.2 Vegetative Groups Present in Areas Where P. crucifer was caught……………….70 3.3 Vegetative Groups Present at Wetland 1 Random Surveys………………………..71 3.4 Vegetative Groups Present at Wetland 2 Random Surveys………………………..71 3.5 Vegetative Groups Present at Wetland 3 Random Surveys…………………….….71 3.6 Vegetative Groups Present at Dawson Wetland Random Surveys……………..….72 3.7 Percent Totals for Each Vegetative Group in All 4 Wetlands Combined……….…72 4.1 Morgan County Call Survey Locations and Results…………………………….…76 v 4.2 Hampshire County Call Survey Locations and Results………………………….77 4.3 Mineral County Call Survey Locations and Results……….………………...…..78 4.4 Monroe County Call Survey Locations and Results……………………………..79 4.5 Summers County Call Survey Locations and Results……………………………79 4.6 Greenbrier County Call Survey Locations and Results…………………………..79 4.7 Berkeley County Call Survey Locations and Results……………………….……80 4.8 Jefferson County Call Survey Locations and Results………………………..…..80 4.9 Hardy County Call Survey Locations and Results……………………………….80 4.10 Pendleton County Call Survey Locations and Results…………………………..81 vi List of Figures 1. Overall distribution of C. guttata………………….……………………….…12 2. Distribution of C. guttata in West Virginia……………………………..……13 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morgan County Relocation Package
    Morgan County Relocation Package Long & Foster/Webber & Associates, Realtors® 480 W. Jubal Early Drive, Suite 100 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Office: 540-662-3484 - Toll Free: 800-468-6619 www.webberrealty.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 GOVERNMENT -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 TAXES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-5 LICENSE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5-6 IMPORTANT NUMBERS -----------------------------------------------------------------------7 HEALTH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-9 CLIMATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 POPULATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------10-11 CHURCHES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 TEMPORARY LODGING -----------------------------------------------------------------12-14 SHOPPING ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------15 TRANSPORTATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------16 SCHOOLS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17-18 LIBRARIES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------19
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Consumption Advisories Available for 2010
    Fish Consumption Advisories Available for 2010 The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) has updated the West Virginia Sport Fish Consumption Advisory for 2010. West Virginia DHHR, through an interagency agreement, partners with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Division of Natural Resources (DNR) to develop consumption advisories for fish caught in West Virginia. Fish consumption advisories are reviewed annually and help West Virginia anglers make educated choices about eating the fish they catch. Certain West Virginia sport fish have been found to have low levels of chemicals like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury, selenium and dioxin. To protect the good health of West Virginians, the West Virginia DHHR offers an advisory for how often these fish can be safely eaten. An advisory is advice, and should not be viewed as law or regulation. It is intended to help anglers and their families make educated choices about: where to fish, what types of fish to eat, how to limit the amount and frequency of fish eaten, and how to prepare and cook fish to reduce contaminants. This advisory covers only sport fish caught in West Virginia waters. Safety regulations and advisories for fish in the market place are the responsibility of the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For more information you can contact the FDA at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm110591.htm The following updated 2010 advisory recommendation is the result of reviewing new and recent fish tissue data. Data collected from lakes and rivers in West Virginia show that a general statewide advisory of sport‐caught fish is appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Wide Fish Tissue Contaminants Survey and Effects of Feeding Type, Season and Gender on Fish Tissue Contamination Levels
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2009 State-wide fish tissue contaminants survey and effects of feeding type, season and gender on fish tissue contamination levels Kenneth L. Stewart West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Stewart, Kenneth L., "State-wide fish tissue contaminants survey and effects of feeding type, season and gender on fish tissue contamination levels" (2009). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4539. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4539 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. State-wide Fish Tissue Contaminants Survey and Effects of Feeding Type, Season and Gender on Fish Tissue Contamination Levels Kenneth L. Stewart Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Design at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Resources Patricia M. Mazik Ph.D., Chairperson Stuart A.
    [Show full text]
  • Oct I 0 1995
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OCT I 0 1995 This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and distr National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete <a£Mi by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being document* d, enter function: architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcati y»*"» trr]rn iifional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all itemsr 1. Name of Property__________________________ _____ _____ historic name Altona other names/site number Altona Farm 2. Location street & number State Route 51 D not for publication city or town __ Charles Town _ HI vicinity state West Virginia code WV CQunty Jefferson code °37 zip code 25414 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this J2j nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of J-listoric Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property D5. meets D does not meettbe National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nali^Aall D statewide Bkjaflally. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan
    Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan Update June 2006 Berkeley County Planning Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – The Role and Purpose of Planning ....................................1 What the Comprehensive Plan does:.................................................2 Relationship between the Comprehensive Plan and Other Plans in Berkeley County..................................................................................2 Recommended Review Process..........................................................2 Chapter 2 – An Introduction to Berkeley County..................................5 Location and Regional Setting ............................................................5 A Brief History of Berkeley County........................................................5 Quick Facts About Berkeley County ...................................................7 Chapter 3 – Key Trends and Issues ..........................................................9 Demographics ......................................................................................10 Housing...................................................................................................10 Land Use.................................................................................................11 Transportation .......................................................................................11 Community Facilities and Services ....................................................11 Economics .............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Easygrants ID: 18868 NFWF/Legacy Grant Project ID: 0603.09.018868
    Easygrants ID: 18868 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation NFWF/Legacy Grant Project ID: 0603.09.018868 Chesapeake Bay Small Watershed Grants 2009 - Submit Final Programmatic Report (Activities) Grantee Organization: Trout Unlimited, Inc. Project Title: Eastern Panhandle Brook Trout Reintroduction (WV) Project Period 10/31/2009 - 12/31/2011 Award Amount $22,309.72 Matching Contributions $22,163.00 Project Location Description (from Proposal) Projects are located in both Districts 1 and 2 in WV. Project Summary (from Proposal) Work with public and private partners to restore water quality and aquatic habitat in four headwater streams of the Cacapon River. Project will install livestock exclusion fencing, establish riparian buffers, and perform water quality monitoring to support the goal of reintroducing eastern brook trout to historical coldwater streams in Hampshire and Hardy Counties, West Virginia. Summary of Accomplishments This Project: a) Restored native vegetation along 3,100 linear feet of streams with an average buffer width of 35 feet (approximately 5 acres); b) Engaged four landowners and 102 volunteers in tree and shrub plantings, educational activities, water quality monitoring, and conservation planning; c) Developed detailed temperature profiles of five streams to and a water quality “snapshot” of Meadow Branch; and d) Piqued WVDNR interest in salmonid restoration or reintroduction in three streams. Lessons Learned Lessons learned include: a) Filling vacancies quickly and planning for project coverage during transition can mitigate the loss of key teammates; b) Tighter oversight of volunteer monitors and interns and regular team meetings would yield more consistent data collection and reporting; c) It is ambitious to make reintroduction of brook trout to previously unstudied streams a project period outcome; d) Brook trout continue to be a valuable focus for landowner outreach (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2008 Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia Jing Wang West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wang, Jing, "Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia" (2008). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2680. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2680 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia Jing Wang Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Consumer Sciences At West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Resources Jinyang Deng, Ph.D., Chair Chad
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Streamside Salamander Guilds and Environmental Variables with an Emphasis on Pseudotriton Ruber Ruber Kathryn Rebecca Pawlik
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2008 West Virginia Streamside Salamander Guilds and Environmental Variables with an Emphasis on Pseudotriton ruber ruber Kathryn Rebecca Pawlik Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Pawlik, Kathryn Rebecca, "West Virginia Streamside Salamander Guilds and Environmental Variables with an Emphasis on Pseudotriton ruber ruber" (2008). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 780. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. West Virginia Streamside Salamander Guilds and Environmental Variables with an Emphasis on Pseudotriton ruber ruber Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences By Kathryn Rebecca Pawlik Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chair Frank Gilliam Jessica Wooten Marshall University Huntington, West Virginia Copyright April 2008 Abstract Amphibian distributions are greatly influenced by environmental variables, due in part to semi-permeable skin which makes amphibians susceptible to both desiccation and toxin absorption. This study was conducted to determine which streamside salamander species were sympatric and how environmental variables may have influenced habitat choices. One hundred sixty streams were surveyed throughout 55 counties in West Virginia during the summer of 2007. At each site, a 10 m2 quadrat was established around a central aquatic habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • World-Class Discoveries Everywhere. History Happens Here. Go Outside and Play! Farm to You!
    GET TO THE HEART OF IT WORLD-CLASS GO OUTSIDE HISTORY FARM TO YOU! DISCOVERIES AND PLAY! HAPPENS HERE. EAT YOUR EVERYWHERE. SCENIC AND GENERALS, SPYS, HEART OUT EXPLORING SERENE SLEEPY TRAINS ... OH MY! THE WORLDS #1 CREEK LAKE FINDING YOUR GEOCACHING RIGHT IN THE LOCAL FLAVOR DESTINATION HIT THE TRAIL MIDDLE OF THE ACTION TRAVEL GUIDE ARE YOU WHERE WILL YOUR READY TO ADVENTURE START? LET’S GO! ESCAPE THE From George Washington to geocaching, railroads to rivers, ORDINARY? fine dining to farm to table, history, hiking, spas, and more Martinsburg, Berkeley County West Virginia should be at the heart of your next adventure. Just a little over an hour west of Washington DC, where rivers meet mountains and history happens, Berkeley County WV makes the perfect getaway and gateway to explore and pursue your passions! Black Draft Distillery 2 3 What’s better than finding a cache? Finding a connection to this amazing place! GET YOUR PASSPORT FOR DISCOVERY ON THE BERKELEY GADGETS GEOTOUR. The Martinsburg-Berkeley County CVB and local cache creator WVTim launched the Berkeley Gadgets GeoTour, in partnership with Geocaching Headquarters. This trail features 18 unique caches designed by NEW TO GEOCACHING? WORLD’S No problem! We have caches for WVTim that will guide you on a geotour of our all experience levels. beautiful county. Geocaching is a treasure GREATEST Passports for this trail are available at the CVB hunt that combines the use of office located at 126 E. Race Street, Martinsburg, technology and the outdoors WV 25401, as well as the I-81 Northbound and that engages folks through GPS GEOCACHING.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENTAL, STATISTICAL and GENERAL INFORMATION ✩
    Section 11 2012:Section 11 6/21/13 2:32 PM Page 759 Section Eleven ✩ DEPARTMENTAL, STATISTICAL and GENERAL INFORMATION ✩ The American Flag Highways ___________ ___________ Pledge of Allegiance Legal Holidays ___________ ___________ Hospitals State Flag, Seal, Day, ___________ Songs, Colors, Tree, Bird, Flower, Animal, Fish, Libraries Fruit, Butterfly, Soil, ___________ Insect, Gem, Locomotive, Mines and Mining Reptile, Fossil ___________ and Exhibition Coal Mine ___________ Oil and Gas ___________ Statistical Summary ___________ Parks and Forests ___________ Aeronautics ___________ Taxation and Finance Census Data ___________ Geographical Section 11 2012:Section 11 6/21/13 2:32 PM Page 760 THE AMERICAN FLAG The Flag of the United States has 13 horizontal stripes-7 red and 6 white-the red and white stripes alternating, and a union which consists of white stars of five points on a blue field placed in the upper quarter next to the staff and extending to the lower edge of the fourth red stripe from the top. The number of stars is the same as the number of States in the Union. The canton or union now contains 50 stars. On the admission of a State into the Union, a star will be added to the union of the Flag and such addition will take effect on the 4th day of July next succeeding such admission. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. STATE FLAG Before the design of the present State Flag was officially adopted by the Legislature on March 7, 1929, by Senate Joint Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Region 1 – Western US
    ^ = Partial Bathymetric Coverage ! = New to/updated in 2011 blue = Vision Coverage * = Detailed Shoreline Only Region 1 – Western US Lake Name State County French Meadows Reservoir CA Placer Alamo Lake AZ La Paz Goose Lake CA Modoc * Bartlett Reservoir AZ Maricopa Harry L Englebright Lake CA Yuba Blue Ridge Reservoir AZ Coconino Hell Hole Reservoir CA Placer Horseshoe Reservoir AZ Yavapai Hensley Lake CA Madera Lake Havasu AZ/CA Various * Huntington Lake CA Fresno Lake Mohave AZ/NV Various Ice House Reservoir CA El Dorado Lake Pleasant AZ Yavapai/Maricopa Indian Valley Reservoir CA Lake Lower Lake Mary AZ Coconino * Jackson Meadow Reservoir CA Sierra San Carlos Reservoir AZ Various * Jenkinson Lake CA El Dorado Sunrise Lake AZ Apache Lake Almanor CA Plumas * Theodore Roosevelt Lake AZ Gila Lake Berryessa CA Napa Upper Lake Mary AZ Coconino Lake Britton CA Shasta Antelop Valley Reservoir CA Plumas ^ Lake Cachuma CA Santa Barbara Barrett Lake CA San Deigo Lake Casitas CA Ventura Beardsley Lake CA Tuolumne Lake Del Valle CA Alameda Black Butte Lake CA Glenn Lake Isabella CA Kern Briones Reservoir CA Contra Costa Lake Jennings CA San Deigo Bullards Bar Reservoir CA Yuba Lake Kaweah CA Tulare Camanche Reservoir CA Various Lake McClure CA Mariposa Caples Lake CA Alpine Lake Natoma CA Sacramento Castaic Lake CA Los Angeles Lake of the Pines CA Nevada Castle Lake CA Siskiyou Lake Oroville CA Butte ^ Clear Lake CA Lake Lake Piru CA Ventura ^ Clear Lake Reservoir CA Modoc * Lake Shasta CA Shasta Cogswell Reservoir CA Los Angeles Lake Sonoma CA
    [Show full text]